TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

blah4life Archive

View 0 posts and 26 comments by blah4life on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Break the plastic habit! Here’s a free plastic coffee cup!
/r/MensRights04/02/18 11:22 AM
0

This article is such a shitpost. This sub is pathetic sometimes. Angry dudes grasping at straws trying to point out why the system is rigged against us men.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 04:51 PM
5

But it the story wasn’t intended to be about homelessness. It was about the first puppy of the year dropped off at a shelter. If you want to know more about the homeless guy who irresponsibly accepted a puppy as a gift, maybe you should research and write about him?
/r/MensRights04/01/18 04:49 PM
4

A man can do something about his situation to improve it. A 6 week old puppy cannot. Hello! It’s not that hard to figure out why the article focuses on the puppy. Some of the posts on this sub are so dumb. I’m a man for men’s rights, but come on.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 04:41 PM
1

It's still deadly force, the aspect of him not having to retreat is unique to Oklahoma state law. He was offered a deal, so unfortunately we won't be able to see how it shakes out in court.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 06:16 PM
1

I also found this in a legal dictionary: When deadly force is used by a private citizen, the citizen must be able to prove that a felony occurred or was being attempted, and that the felony threatened death or bodily harm. Mere suspicion of a felony is considered an insufficient ground for a private citizen to use deadly force. His response was not justified.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 05:40 PM
1

I'm pretty sure his response was well within the definition of "deadly force", and its use may be justified only under conditions of extreme necessity, when all lesser means have failed or cannot reasonably be employed. His use of it was not justified given the circumstances shown in the video.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 05:34 PM
1

You are that hair. Think about it.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 10:28 PM
1

Not after they see the video of her attacking first.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 08:47 PM
1

No, you're wrong, sir. My point was that level of violence wasn't necessary by him when dealing with a person of that size, considering the damage taken by him. If a little 120lb, 18yo guy pushed the football player and he responded this with this level of violence, I would be just as disgusted. I'm not arguing against female privilege. It exists. This was just unnecessary, and no amount of debating by you or anyone else in this thread will change that. 99% of the time, a dude hits a female like…
/r/MensRights23/12/16 08:42 PM
1

You need to learn the DIFFERENCE between defence and defense, you brainless twit.
/r/MGTOW20/12/16 07:10 PM
2

The last thing the men's rights movement needs is uneducated, violent creeps like u/hojangle. His type of speech is only about taking enjoyment from violence against women and the suffering of woman. IMO that isn't what it's about. You should see the messages he's sending me. Bragging about how he's punched over 20 woman, and hasn't spent a night in jail. Really disgusting.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 06:21 PM
3

Fuck, you're disgusting.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 06:16 PM
1

Yeah, you seem mentally stable. /s
/r/MGTOW20/12/16 06:15 PM
0

You don't know shit about me. Go fuck off.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 06:06 PM
0

I've been assaulted enough times to know that his response was excessive and not justified.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 04:42 AM
1

Come on, dude. That hard of a punch wasn't necessary. Give me a break. Should she have slapped and pushed him, no. If he would've had the self control to walk away and call the police, she could have been in jail and not him!
/r/MensRights20/12/16 04:28 AM
2

That wasn't my problem with the video at all. If I have a conceal carry permit and someone pushes me at a bar, I can't take out my gun and shoot them dead. Regardless of if the person was the aggressor. That was my point. His reaction to her push and slap was not justified. He's seriously lucky she didn't have a traumatic brain injury. Your analogy doesn't work. You're comparing a human with the ability to reason with a giant wild animal. I didn't say a reaction wasn't justified. I said that the…
/r/MensRights20/12/16 04:25 AM
2

Really, man? Come on. You must be trolling.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 01:07 AM
1

I didn't say that. But a more measured response was possible on his part. There are a hundred different ways he could have restrained her. You're seriously trying to justify that?
/r/MensRights20/12/16 01:07 AM
0

Subduing her in that way was in no way justified. He hit her hard enough to kill her. You sound like a dude who hits women yourself, and your post makes you sound like an uneducated caveman. HELLO! ABUSING WOMEN DOESN'T EQUAL MEN'S RIGHTS. Is that what this sub has become?
/r/MensRights19/12/16 11:47 PM
1

He threw a punch like he was trying to knock out a dude his own size. Totally uncalled for. He never should've hit her like that. He could've easily restrained her or any of her friends.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 11:41 PM
6

Title is misleading. Sorry OP, I'm a man who's all for men's rights, but there's no excuse for that intense of a response by him. Self defense? That's a joke. For what? A little slap and shove from a 120lb girl? He wasn't threatened by her in any way. Call it like it is OP.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 10:18 PM
4

Chavs amirite?
/r/MensRights27/11/16 04:00 PM
5

Without his WALLET... FTFY
/r/MensRights14/03/14 09:51 PM
7

But are they still allowed in mcdonalds? If not, that's the real tragedy here.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 08:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter