TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

blahPerson Archive

View 0 posts and 81 comments by blahPerson on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Red Pill adherents and the PUA crowd can be streaked with misogyny, that's true sometimes, it'll vary from person to person but if you really study the lessons that The Red Pill offers, it tries to look at women and relationships objectively stripped from societal pleasantries; not to explicitly hate women. It's not nice to know that being shorter, or having a meaningless social circle will be detrimental to your relationships with women. Sometimes this leads to insecurity and bitterness and som…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/21 07:15 AM
1

That is an interesting way to frame it, like being tall makes you visible in a way, it's an undeniable manifestation of your genetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/20 05:49 AM
1

Yeah it's not just like get tall, shrink your eyes and grow dimples is very helpful.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/20 07:27 AM
1

Sure a very handsome man is a package but muscles are a part of that package so it's logical advice to go to the gym and get stronger, some men can't be very handsome but they can upgrade to decent.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/20 07:18 AM
3

You said just be lean but research shows women prefer physically stronger bodies, not lean bodies but muscular bodies.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/20 06:55 AM
20

No one will be surprised by the idea that strong men are more attractive,” said study author Aaron Lukaszewski, an evolutionary psychologist at California State University at Fullerton. “It's no secret that women like strong, muscular guys.” There was no nuance to these results, he said. Zero of the 160 women surveyed showed a statistical preference for weaker men. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2017/12/12/women-rate-the-strongest-men-as-the-most-attractive-study-find…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/20 01:48 PM
1

If you're plan is to get immigrants to make up the difference it can be.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 05:27 PM
2

There was absolutely evidence of migrants moving to Europe from the middle east precisely for those benefits.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 04:54 PM
-1

Same thing but FDS is bitter memes and RP is essayed philosophies.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 11:34 AM
3

If you can have redpill you can have FDS.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 11:17 AM
1

What does this mean, it's serious business over on FDS?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 11:13 AM
1

especially with someone who studied the subject at hand. What are you talking about? This is private conversation, move along buddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/20 12:22 AM
1

I am civil. I'm not name calling am I.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/20 12:20 AM
1

Weakness and vulnerability Wait I never said all vulnerability, here vulnerability is caused by weakness, being weak makes you vulnerable, I'm being specific about a type of vulnerability. What I suppose I was referring to was your utter disbelief that I might be compassionate towards a man who is upset with jealousy over something they deeply and passionately desire I think you would be angry and turned off. Not compassionate, you're not his mother and you don't want to be. And you didn't say t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/20 05:41 PM
1

find all vulnerability and weakness in men 'creepy'. I never said that. The bit where you said that women (implying all) don't have empathy. I never said that. I said. so to keep yourself safe you are sensitive to a man who is insecure, emotional, unstable And the crying bit depends on what they're crying about, if his mother died that's understandable, if they cry because they're jealous, that's not at all appealing is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/20 04:52 PM
1

Woah saying that woman prefer stoic men isn't out landish, even you admit it that my theory was true but you qualified for most women, I'm saying it's almost every woman. But in the end you said you don't know, so who are you trying to convince.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/20 03:06 PM
1

What did I say about a wall of text? So I guess will just leave it as 'who knows'. I mean, first of all, you said "all women are like this, evolution". Such a chick move right now, blaming me for your wall of text. I have been nothing but consistent.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/20 02:31 PM
1

Above it I did say how I thought you were just wrong. You're all over the place sweetheart. So what is it do the vast majority of women prefer a stoic man or do they prefer a sensitive one. Tell me.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/20 01:31 PM
1

If we were going to be "its a debate!!!" about this - I don't have to. You're the one that is proposing either a universal or statistically generalised hypothesis about how women behave, so really you're the one who should be supporting that statement with evidence that isn't just conjecture. But if we're going to be more "we're just chatting any learning" - still, I don't really know what 'data' or evidence I would use. Am I supposed to bring up a meta-study of research showing 100s of studies …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/20 12:52 PM
1

Let's be clear you haven't provided any data yourself, but you agree with what I said. Your hypothesis is correct in terms of a statistical majority of women I know I'm right but you're not like the other girls, you're not creeped out by puppies or men who tweak their backs, or when men show genuine grief, you're practically the next mother Theresa. Here is a truism for you, don't listen to what women say, watch what they do, I hear this a lot, women saying they love sensitive guys and yet women…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/20 11:57 AM
0

It's fascinating to watch people override their instincts with political correctness, how hard was it for you to indoctrinate yourself against your own intrinsic proclivity? There are reams of evolution psychology on the importance on this selectivity. The reason why weak men are creepy - you're tweaked back analogy was awful by the way - is because men can be dangerous, you are not designed to level a man physically, you are tuned by nature to have a keen sense of a mans disposition and charact…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 11:39 PM
1

False confidence is a great way to describe it, when your confidence is phony you compensate for it, you try to force it upon others because it doesn't manifest naturally, it's not based on anything and so there's a constant need to remedy your self perception and how others actually perceive you. And I don't believe your overt empathy. If you're a woman you have a low tolerance for it, we survived as a species because women raised tough men and married tough men. Weakness and vulnerability is c…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 03:20 PM
1

someone who can't let other people lead and default to other's wishes, and will always escalate or try to 'win' over aggression rather than walk away, That's the opposite of confidence that's a lack of self esteem, the constant need to one up someone or win a disagreement is someone trying to manage their personal deficiencies. And the crying bit depends on what they're crying about, if his mother died that's understandable, if they cry because they're jealous, that's not at all appealing is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/20 01:28 PM
1

I know, I'm reducing my usage for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/20 02:38 PM
1

I kind of agree with this, reddit is a waste of time and the people on it stink.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/20 10:20 AM
-1

context?
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy28/03/20 09:13 AM
2

And the women perusing Purple Pill who oppose it aren't in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 12:54 AM
2

From the article I found in their 20's they do. http://content.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,2015274,00.html ​ The figures come from James Chung of Reach Advisors, who has spent more than a year analyzing data from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey. He attributes the earnings reversal overwhelmingly to one factor: education. For every two guys who graduate from college or get a higher degree, three women do. This is almost the exact opposite of the graduation ratio that exist…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/20 02:12 AM
2

Yeah it does, but at least I can qualify the claim, maybe you have something that shows women welcome sex robots, anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/20 01:58 AM
6

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6730555/Swedish-feminists-demand-ban-sex-robots-dehumanise-women-just-like-pornography.html
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/20 01:15 AM
2

It's been an emotional ride, I've calmed down now, I feel better, I'm no longer red in the face.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 04:18 AM
2

Yes you older men Excuse me!? But I agree, zoomers are soooooft.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 03:02 AM
2

Stop right there, men are more employeed and work harder.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 02:55 AM
2

Listen to me, in every occupational field, men out earn women. Alright. I don't want to fight but I will hammer this until you get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 02:49 AM
2

This is why men die before women, women can intuitively raise the blood pressure of men, I want to take that OCED report and rub in your face until you read it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 02:39 AM
2

Oh goodness nike that is not how it works, we can't ignore that stats and say let's ask nike, she knows what's happening on the streets.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 02:37 AM
2

You're not reading the links Nik, employment in services and retail jobs are equally divided between sexes. Secondly in all categories of occupations men earn more. It doesn't matter if its medical, teaching, whatever, men make more. I'm not gloating I just don't like being told something that isn't true.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 02:34 AM
2

Listen you're not reading the statistics I'm showing you. You should align your opinions based on facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 02:26 AM
2

That's just not true based on statistics, men are more employed than women https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=54749 And there is evidence that men tend to work harder and more often than women. https://economics.uchicago.edu/blog/study-finds-gender-pay-gap-among-uber-drivers That's why men earn more. https://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/womens-earnings/2018/home.htm
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 02:23 AM
1

If we go back to the statistics, 42% of college students are male and it's been that way for over a decade but men do still make more. I wonder if trade skills are compensating for this maybe. https://www.forbes.com/sites/ccap/2015/05/04/the-disappearing-college-male/#1c684d0b4d3c
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 02:16 AM
2

So you're changing it now, in the future they will earn more, the majority of women who are not nurses and teachers are administrative assistance, human resources and such, the number one degree women study is business administration. Personally I don't think earnings will change because the majority of women will choose family over work.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 02:04 AM
3

But they do make more based on the statistics, just because you have a degree in women studies doesn't mean you can make money.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 01:54 AM
3

Hang on now, you said millennial women make more than millennial men, that's not true because engineers earn more than nurses. But even if comparing within fields men tend to advance further because women tend to prioritize families, men take fewer absences and take on more hours. Essentially men make more because and they work harder. https://economics.uchicago.edu/blog/study-finds-gender-pay-gap-among-uber-drivers
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 01:43 AM
2

Yes bish it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/20 11:43 PM
2

I looked through it and yes and their is a wage gap for good reason. Engineers make more than nurses.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/20 09:35 PM
5

Not true, Men out earn women in all age brackets, from the Buerea of Labor and Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/womens-earnings/2018/home.htm You need that money, you want that money.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/20 08:58 PM
1

and a lot of women don't need or want a man to provide for them. Let's be real, that's absolutely false. It's nearly the number one thing a woman wants in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/20 08:54 PM
1

Ignore what they think doesn't that appeal to you, building a family like that?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/20 11:26 AM
1

I think that if we were to settle into a nice home, you don't have to work as much to cover costs, my sole operating business has gotten pass the first shaky three years when 60% of businesses fail, I'm now adding an employee to the books, our income is more stable. We've sold the old car and buying a land rover for the kids we want to eventually have. You would feel deeply loving of that perseverance and leadership wouldn't you?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/20 11:20 AM
1

We're getting by, but we had to repair the car unexpectedly and our wages are a little stagnant, we're overworked and tired what then?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/20 11:13 AM
1

They're attached but what about the bills and rent is getting more expensive, work is more challenging now, what then?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/20 11:10 AM
1

Yes I agree personality, and then what?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/20 11:07 AM
1

Into what, based on what?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/20 11:05 AM
1

A relationship purely based on looks is shallow and will quickly dissolve.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/20 11:03 AM
1

A marriage without sexual attraction, a byproduct of a relationship without a foundation it seems.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/20 11:00 AM
1

But people eventually lose their looks, I guess the woman will start looking at all those other beautiful big jaws you so admire.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/20 10:55 AM
1

But the face gets old doesn't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/20 10:52 AM
1

Well I never said you had to marry the woman, pump and dump does the same trick.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/20 10:50 AM
1

Whether it's because of a face, finances or physical strength it doesn't matter, the end result is still the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/20 10:45 AM
1

Nonsense, all attraction is natural, whether it's for money, looks, body or leadership, all of it is innate in women and neither one is more honorable, it's just nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/20 10:41 AM
1

Being loved for your face is no more genuine than being loved for your ability to provide or no more genuine than being loved for having a sexy body. It's all animal instinct.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/20 10:32 AM
2

A strong body body will always improve your chances, no reason to focus on something you can't change.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/20 10:28 AM
1

If you're financially secure, confident, assertive and physically strong, that can get you a long way, why focus on something you can't change?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/20 10:24 AM
1

The research says that you take any face and add a strong body to it you make that person more attractive, you can't change your face but you can change your body.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/20 10:19 AM
2

size and shape.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/20 04:17 AM
2

We're not talking about the face we are talking about the effect weight lifting has on the body, and in a study where 150 women were tested, stronger bodies were preferred over weaker bodies every single time.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/20 04:17 AM
4

Not true, there is research that shows women pick strength over height and leaness. The results showed that it was possible to almost perfectly predict how attractive a man's body is from three things: how physically strong he looks, how tall he is, and how lean he is. The effect of strength was so large that none of the 150 women in the study preferred weak men. Furthermore, looking strong was much more important for man's attractiveness than being tall or lean. https://phys.org/news/2017-12-up…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 11:33 PM
1

They picked people who had more muscle as being stronger which is generally true.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/20 07:42 AM
1

You're contradicting yourself, you say for women looks usually have nothing to do with it but women are estimating strength based on looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/20 02:25 AM
9

I'm not saying the face doesn't matter, but I am saying stronger bodies were always preferred every single time even more so than height. You can't change your face or height but you can change your body.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/20 05:29 PM
19

The results showed that it was possible to almost perfectly predict how attractive a man's body is from three things: how physically strong he looks, how tall he is, and how lean he is. The effect of strength was so large that none of the 150 women in the study preferred weak men. Furthermore, looking strong was much more important for man's attractiveness than being tall or lean. https://phys.org/news/2017-12-upper-body-strength-key-factor.html
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/20 02:21 PM
2

I think they do, in any social interaction people have an innate understanding on who's the leader, who is charismatic, who is the most influential, who is forceful in pushing their agendas and people make decisions on how far they can go along with it or what sort of resistance they are able to put able against other people.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy02/10/19 03:22 PM
6

What happened to this woman?
/r/TheRedPill18/09/19 10:04 AM
5

You don't have to give religion credit for creating gender roles but you can't say they don't reaffirm them.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/19 12:52 PM
15

That's not exactly true, the Judaeo religions have clearly defined gender roles, men being leaders and such.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/19 11:03 AM
4

What are some of the crazy things she has said?
/r/TheRedPill25/12/14 02:22 AM
0

What you don't understand is that the ministry of Jesus was to take religious routine and elevate them consciously, so no longer did you have to sacrifice animals for forgiveness but now with the new covenant forgiveness came with merely regret and repentance. 1 John 3:15 Everyone who hates his brother is a murderer; and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him. This is another example of how the thought was comparable to the action. Hating someone had the same sinful consequenc…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/14 03:41 AM
0

Notice how the context of Matthew 5:27-28 is adultery, the coveting/stealing of another man's wife. You're saying it applies only to married women? See I think that by broadening the qualifications of adultery it also broadens the conditions for other sexual relationships, if intimacy is sinful with a married or unmarried woman, it follows that lustful thoughts towards married women are similarly sinful as if it were an unmarried woman.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/14 05:36 PM
1

Kelly Starrett advises that your ear should align with your shoulder and your shoulder should align with the middle of your waist. And imagine your hip is a bowl full of water and you have to balance it, for me having a slight anterior pelvic tilt... http://www.hudsonvalleyscoliosis.com/lordosis-treatment this had the effect of rolling my posterior down and pushing my groin forward slightly, what you get is a very neutral somewhat military posture.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/14 03:37 PM
0

The bible also says homosexuals are bad It also says thoughts about sex outside marriage is a sin. This stems from the theology that human nature is inherently sinful. and abortions are illegal. The bible doesn't mention abortions to my knowledge, I believe because there wasn't a medical procedure in that region and time so it was never discussed and giving birth in Jewish culture was an honour among women probably because of it's danger and difficulty.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/14 03:24 PM
2

I think that some of the advice was fair, considering that the harassment were only looks and innuendo in conversations, I think that some of the advice would have mirrored if it were a woman complaining but not all of it. Though some of it is just stupid and inconsiderate.
/r/MensRights03/03/10 02:05 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter