TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

blamb211 Archive

View 2 posts and 308 comments by blamb211 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

blamb211/r/MensRights02/05/13 09:04 PM
0

blamb211/r/MensRights12/05/13 11:02 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

My graduating class I never thought about it, but it does make sense that you go to school to be a funeral director.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 03:04 AM
3

My wife is due in June, she plans on leaving her job to stay at home with baby, and is much like yours (also Southern!). I'll likely stay up late taking care of him, since I go to work a little later in the morning, so she can get some sleep. Relationships become a hell of a lot easier when you both realize there's equal work involved
/r/MensRights28/02/16 04:22 AM
1

I also found it interesting that at least in the thumbnails, the dudes in the "lesbians touching penises" video were naked, the women in the other video were not. I wouldn't really call it a problem based on that alone, but it's notable
/r/MensRights26/01/16 01:36 AM
1

Baking cookies is WAY better than working in a cubicle. I've done both within the past 72 hours, and there's one that I'd much rather be doing. I do like my job just fine, but I wouldn't really say I "enjoy" it.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 05:47 AM
2

You... Really... Smell... Like... Dog... Buns...
/r/MensRights22/12/15 03:01 PM
19

Neither do they, that's the problem.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 11:34 PM
53

Seriously, I can't imagine how much they pay their lawyers in a year. There's no way whoever she finds can compete.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 04:03 AM
6

Or is actually a republic. Or is even Korean!
/r/MensRights18/11/15 02:03 AM
1

Overreaction. Assuming she's right, dude should have put in prison, but cutting his dick off? Massive bitch move.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:13 AM
4

Blame Canada!
/r/MensRights03/11/15 03:38 AM
6

Lots.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 03:38 AM
1

Fucking rookie, man
/r/MensRights25/10/15 06:01 PM
13

How has she not been arrested yet? If she's directly violating court orders, why is the police not smashing her door down? Bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 12:52 AM
2

On the others hand, breasts. Barely...
/r/MensRights05/10/15 02:34 AM
2

I would say there's a difference between someone being your role model, and being an inspiration for what you want to do, though.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 05:26 AM
3

Celebrities in general shouldn't be role models. Musicians, actors, athletes, whatever. If you aspire to doing that, that's one thing. But wanting to model your life off of them is going to be a mistake, like 95% of the time.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 05:25 AM
4

how drunk she may have been. Did they actually use that as an excuse? Cuz if they did, I'd almost say that should hurt her case more than help it.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 05:23 AM
6

Well, prepare yourself. Tomorrow is October, Susan G Komen is about to be fucking EVERYWHERE.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:16 PM
3

Or can we never truly objectify men in a patriarchy? Well fuck me, sounds like they already have their minds made up.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 10:58 PM
3

Relevant Dilbert (Yes, I am trying to make that a thing. I love Dilbert.)
/r/MensRights06/09/15 09:00 PM
13

Arguing with an idiot is like playing chess with a pigeon. They'll just shit on everything, knock the pieces over, and then strut around like they won. Or something like that.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 08:48 PM
1

Luckily, I know for a fact that there's no gender studies or similar requirement at my school. So I'm not gonna have to take it, thank Christ.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 04:33 AM
2

Obviously. I'm an IT major, I'd only be in such a class only if it was required. Not required? Fuck that noise, I'm gonna take something that doesn't shame me based on the sex I was born as.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 06:24 PM
2

Seriously. If I was in such a class, I'd just say fuck it and not care.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 05:03 PM
53

How do you not get it? They're not the sexist ones! /s
/r/MensRights31/08/15 05:03 PM
1

It's the love of children, for sure. We're still young, but adoption is definitely an option, if needed
/r/MensRights30/08/15 08:51 PM
3

Then I guess my wife isn't actually a woman. We're in our 20s, and she's quite upset that we haven't been able to get pregnant yet.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 05:46 PM
9

Wait... So they don't need self awareness?
/r/MensRights28/08/15 05:47 AM
8

Has a woman seriously been aqcuitted of homicide charges using a PMS defense?
/r/MensRights28/08/15 02:40 AM
2

But look at this Instagram account of attractive men with man buns at Disneyland! That's not objectification at all! Seriously. Facebook tells me it's trending right now. How is that okay, but candid shots of attractive women isn't?
/r/MensRights22/08/15 12:07 AM
6

Yeah, but how is that claiming oppression and unfair treatment?
/r/MensRights22/08/15 12:05 AM
2

Ghetto blaster has always been a name for them. No idea where the name came from, that's just what they're called.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 12:04 AM
1

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
/r/MensRights19/08/15 09:51 PM
5

No it does not. It does get my blood all angried up sometimes, but it never gets old.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 08:52 PM
3

Gotta say, I'm pretty proud that I've been added to it. I find it hilarious. Let the brigading begin!
/r/MensRights29/07/15 10:19 PM
23

I have to assume that it's at least 50/50. Because the characters generally aren't THAT slutty. Last con I went to, there was a girl dressed as an "elf." She had the pointy ears on, and then a half shirt and bootier-than-booty shorts. Wasn't even a specific character, she just obviously wanted to show off as much skin as possible.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 02:56 PM
7

Comic Con and such does seem to be an opportunity to dress as slutty as you want, and nobody says anything. Never really understood that.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 02:26 PM
1

If he tells them he's recording after the fact, they can still not consent.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 09:24 PM
3

They list many scholarships ONLY for minorities and not whites under the guise of cultural diversity. Well, and on top of that, all scholarships and things available to white people are also available to minorities. I'm not saying we need to exclude minorities from white people things, I'm just saying is it really fair to exclude white people from things? No. No it isn't.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 09:23 PM
8

But he needs to stay at home and only sleep with his wife. Because empowerment!
/r/MensRights21/07/15 06:54 PM
20

Yeah, but then you're gonna be some woman's fashion accessory. Didn't you know? Sassy gay friends are SO in right now.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 09:26 PM
10

Which is absolute bullshit. The system working like that and allowing it is just a disgrace.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 09:03 PM
1

I'm 23 and married, and we're coming up on a year. It's been pretty worth it so far. Obviously, only time will tell if there's going to be issues, but we've both agreed that divorce will ONLY be considered as a last resort after we'd tried all other options. I do kinda feel like some people divorce after one or two attempted solutions, instead of everything possible. And not every case ends that way, or needs to try all solutions before separating, but divorce sometimes comes to early, I would s…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 07:39 PM
3

Seems like she's also assuming that an accusation is the same thing as evidence. Which, I guess it kinda is, but still. Just a pretty big mismatch, if you ask me.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 05:56 PM
-2

So just based on the chance she's crazy and you'll get divorced, you're better off not getting married? I just don't understand that logic.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 05:55 PM
8

You could probably find an easy chance to make it happen. Just stick it in crazy, then never call her again. Boom, she's gonna accuse you of SOMETHING.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 05:08 PM
16

I don't think it's as common as we'd like to believe, but happening at all that way is happening too often.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 05:03 PM
6

Then doubly so. Innocent until proven guilty. Especially if there's nothing to be guilty about.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 05:02 PM
3

Don't get married to crazy people like the reply commenter. There's still plenty of non-crazies out there. If you feel like they're all crazy, then don't get married. But trying to convince everybody to not get married doesn't really make sense.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 04:41 PM
68

In some cases, not even being allowed to present the proof. Oh, you're in college and somebody accused you of sexual assault? Expelled. No trial, no hearing, just get the fuck out. Yeah, that's equality for you.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 04:39 PM
114

Also, because it's in court, I'm pretty sure you still are innocent until proven guilty. If it's the other way around, then the court system has failed everybody. I mean, it's already failing men left and right, but still.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 04:38 PM
13

Based off of one sentence? Talking about jumping to conclusions... I'm not gonna say there's no problems, but I don't know the guy or the relationship.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 01:56 AM
17

Because about thirty walks a year, and the ENTIRE NFL going pink for the whole month of October isn't supporting breast cancer at all.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 05:10 PM
2

Literally made the fat dude a neckbeard. Not exactly rooting him to begin with.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 08:50 AM
4

We call these retards White Knights
/r/MensRights05/07/15 06:01 AM
3

Logic!
/r/MensRights05/07/15 05:58 AM
6

See, in sales, ABC stands for "Always Be Closing."
/r/MensRights02/07/15 08:07 PM
8

Male perspective. That's about all it takes over there.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 12:36 AM
2

I'd vote for him. Assuming our views on other issues line up, of course. But he definitely gets points for this.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 09:11 PM
13

The mods approved the comment, admins are the ones that shadowbanned him
/r/MensRights29/06/15 01:28 PM
1

Gendered issue or not, this is some BULL-SHIT. Probably driving drunk, if not, then extremely distracted, killed somebody, arrest them. None of this special treatment because she's famous, because she's a woman, because she's rich, none of it.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 07:14 PM
1

Gooby plz
/r/MensRights20/06/15 04:11 PM
3

Lying in court is called perjury, but Idk how it works.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 02:14 PM
6

Seriously, what are they expecting to happen? "Enlightened"? That doesn't really mean anything! There's no bar that's been set, nothing to compare it to. Not that that would make it okay, but it would show that the parents are at least semi-rational
/r/MensRights12/06/15 02:11 AM
2

I don't understand why they're so opposed to "educating" people. If you're not gonna teach them what the deal is, HOW ARE THEY SUPPOSED TO KNOW WHAT THE DEAL IS??
/r/MensRights11/06/15 08:27 PM
1

Women are just stronger than men Sooo... Why are we helping them, then?
/r/MensRights11/06/15 08:24 PM
2

I'd say it's more general cluelessness than hypocrisy, but still. If you're willing to be that clueless, there's something wrong.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 06:09 PM
3

Possibly where he got it from. Saw it there earlier today. Nothing wrong with a cross post.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 06:04 PM
2

So there you go. I guess I was pretty close.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 09:42 PM
2

I want to say "the west" mostly refers to like the US, Canada, and most of Europe. Maybe parts of the Middle East and Egypt. But I'm not sure at all.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 09:36 PM
12

Same as when they argue that a 8/12/15 year old boy can consent to sex with an adult, but a, 8/12/15 year old girl can't. Boys magically are born and are in control of everything their whole lives. Women lose control at the drop of a hat.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 04:49 PM
1

The guy she accused is suing the school, I forget exactly what grounds. I think if he sued her, it would be a civil case, and he wouldn't be able to get anything out of her. She just barely graduated, she's as broke-ass as he is. She absolutely should be charged with something, but I don't think it's going to happen. Unfortunately.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 07:42 PM
0

It's one thing to listen and believe that something happened, and investigate (as you should). It's another to listen and believe unconditionally, and start a witch hunt based purely on an accusation.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 07:27 PM
3

That's incredibly unproductive But I won't tell you why it is. I'm gonna be unproductive while calling you unproductive. Yeah, great logic there.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 05:03 PM
5

Canned on the spot and probably have people trying to get him tried for hate speech.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 10:22 PM
14

See, your problem is you think you're dealing with rational human beings. Your line of thought it perfectly valid, but because of the people who scream the loudest and almost constantly cry discrimination, it'll just never work.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 09:26 PM
27

NO DEFECATION WITHOUT SEGREGATION!
/r/MensRights21/05/15 09:25 PM
1

Yeah, but it's just women venting about men. Let us attack and bash you people in a safe space without you interrupting us. How does that logic make any sense to anybody?
/r/MensRights20/05/15 06:15 PM
2

Gonna have to be a bigger bank account than the tall, fit dude.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 09:02 PM
1

She's totally gonna start hitting him because he lied, and nobody is gonna give a shit about it.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 09:01 PM
3

Good luck to her actually getting what she's looking for, though.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 09:01 PM
2

My experience on Tinder was girls setting up the account, and having the entirety of their profile be "Instagram: [link] Twitter: [link] Youtube: [link]" and then maybe going through and right swiping a few guys every so often. Gotta get them followers. This was a couple years ago, so hopefully it's different now, but man, wasting everybody's time.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 09:00 PM
2

I guess the difference is in how they're applied.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 08:58 PM
0

God, I hope so. That would be hilarious.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 08:49 PM
7

B-But... Muh triggers...
/r/MensRights18/05/15 08:45 PM
12

Yeah, pretty much everybody I've heard talk about the movie is how awesome it is. Not about how much they hate it, and how they're boycotting it.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 08:38 PM
9

Women are better at ... running the government Are they, though? Is there anything that indicates that other than people claiming there wouldn't be any wars if there was a woman president?
/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:32 PM
17

That's racist.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:32 PM
0

Why resign yourself to a bitter divorce? My wife and I have come to the conclusion (because we actually do talk about things) that divorce is the LAST resort, up until that point, every single one of our problems is going to be talked about, and we're gonna try our damnedest to make our married last forever. Which, in my opinion, is the way it should be. Why give up at the first sign of trouble? That's madness.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 10:08 PM
3

But then they pull the race/sexist card, and you're the villain again :/ it's bullshit, really.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 10:06 PM
2

Tina, how fucking dare you use Weird Al as your profile picture if you're gonna spew that bullshit. That man is a national treasure.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 10:06 PM
1

Yep. That is completely voluntary, though. I choose to do it.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 09:49 PM
1

I'm getting 32k in Salt Lake City. How's that?
/r/MensRights14/05/15 06:08 PM
1

What constitutes the financial ability test? I feel like I'd be good on common sense, but financial ability... Also, I'm not fat, or a chick, so I'm covered there, too.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 04:17 PM
2

I think the "It's our turn now" argument is completely ridiculous. It gives away what their attitude is. If people calling themselves "feminists" actually were about equality, they wouldn't care about about having a turn on top. That's not equality. It's not even anything that has personally affected them. Chances are, especially if they live in the US, there have been very, very few negative things that have happened purely because they're a woman. It's just a bullshit argument, and pokes a bil…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 04:23 PM
5

6'2 here. I'm apparently a giant.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 04:17 PM
7

Um... I think I might be spending too much time on TumblrinAction...
/r/MensRights13/05/15 12:37 AM
30

Violence = guns + privilege + testicles. Therefore, all violence is against women. Its not possible to be violent against men. That actually hurt to type.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 07:27 PM
32

Because body positivity only applies to women, all men everywhere need to be 6'3 and bodybuilders. No exceptions.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 07:25 PM
13

Pretty sure this kind of thing happened on a large scale in both 2008 and 2012. "I need to vote for Obama, I need to show that I'm okay with having a black resident! I need to show that I'm not racist!" No, you are racist. You're judging based on race.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 05:01 PM
1

Neuropsych is at least cool sounding.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 11:20 PM
8

Fuck, by idiot logic, 7 year old males are able to consent, 25 year old females that have had half a beer are not.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 05:15 PM
2

their career period is basically over FTFY
/r/MensRights29/04/15 05:14 PM
1

Is the high school graduation difference there because of gender politics, or is it just there because the female population is larger than the male population? That's just a very slight difference, I could very easily see it being there because the difference in gender numbers.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 09:26 PM
1

Not in every case. That is common, but it's not the rule.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 05:37 PM
5

It should be
/r/MensRights20/04/15 04:48 PM
4

And if they voted for him because he shares their skin color, they're racist. That's how it works.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 03:46 PM
32

Supporting Hillary because she's a woman is just as sexist as supporting Obama because he's black is racist.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 05:59 AM
3

I'm fairly certain that unless the girl in the picture is a hardcore tumblr feminist, she'd be excited that he liked her butt. If some smoking celebrity basically complimented me in some way, even without me knowing, I'd be excited.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 12:39 AM
2

Oh yeah, I got that. Just adding to your anecdote. She needs to get her head out of her ass.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 12:01 AM
2

I just got hired at a place that does nationwide tech support. I wore a suit and tie to both interviews, and they don't really have a dress code. We're basically allowed to wear whatever we want as long as it's not obscene or offensive.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 11:12 PM
1

Showed this story to my wife. She confirms: this "news" story is bullshit, the girl is completely full of herself and has no idea how the real world works.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 11:11 PM
1

Bullies punch down. Soon as they converge on you, drop to the ground.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 06:37 AM
4

They know they'll definitely get those weirdos that chain themselves up and do "slave marches" or whatever because white guilt
/r/MensRights12/04/15 06:36 AM
2

Fucking pandering, man. Doesn't matter what the situation is, I fucking hate it.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 04:36 AM
5

Anybody calls me a sexist for opposing her (and I'm like 95% sure I will at some point), and I'll just say "fine, I'm a sexist. I still don't think she'd be a good president."
/r/MensRights10/04/15 05:32 PM
7

Not to mention that Malfoy is possibly the world's BIGGEST twat, especially in the books. He just struts around, insulting and trying to fuck up literally everybody outside Slytherin and Snape, and then gets all pissy and whiney when someone else tries to get back at him or something. I'm in book 4, and he insults Ron's mom, Harry comes back with a yo momma of his own, and suddenly, moms are out of bounds. It's fucking ridiculous.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 11:54 PM
6

If the only reason you have for not doing something is the fear that you'd get in trouble for it, you're not a good person.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 09:27 PM
1

Of course, it did give us "Im Fucking Ben Affleck" which i thought was awesome. Especially with Josh Grobans beautiful solo.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 04:55 PM
7

still It's been like two months... And how often do you switch cell phone providers?
/r/MensRights09/04/15 04:54 PM
7

Keyword there is "talented." Not that that's any if surprise, but that's what diversity obsessed people are missing out on. it's extremely likely that they pass over the perfect person for the job, just because they're white and male. Anybody can be talented, but you're hurting yourself big time when you completely eliminate an entire population of prospective employees.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 05:31 PM
10

Well, a good chunk of hiring is to see if you'd do well at the job...
/r/MensRights06/04/15 05:25 PM
24

Very likely promoting people unfit for the job. That's what happens when you look specifically for women or minorities for promotions. you're going to HAVE to sacrifice talent or quality, because you're very likely excluding people that have the qualities you're looking for.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 05:17 PM
1

I've never heard of this woman before, and since she's a politician, it was pretty safe to assume she wasn't trans. I was wrong, apparently.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 01:41 PM
45

Just proves that equality laws are only necessary when they're helping women. If a law or program is needed to help men, eh fuck them, they're doing fine.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 04:38 AM
2

If she was born a woman, and is trans woman, she's a fucking woman. Go ahead and put her down, there's no hope for her. She's beyond crazy.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 06:37 PM
4

She does realize that "cis scum" most likely includes her, right?
/r/MensRights01/04/15 04:59 PM
5

Fuck, as soon as I read "sex session" I knew her treatment wouldn't be fair. Any time the media calls it anything other than what it is, that's an automatic indicator that they got off easy.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 05:56 PM
9

"Let's not blame the victim..." You're referring to the person who accused people of an awful crime, in an attempt to ruin their lives. The actual victims here are those who were punished for it, despite the crime never actually happening. Dumbass.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 11:53 PM
71

I mean... What did you expect from a liberal arts college in Portland?
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:07 PM
245

rape culture is indisputable I don't need proof! its common knowledge! you can't even try to contradict me!
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:05 PM
2

I wonder when the data will be published. Whenever that is, I'd love to see what they found out.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:11 AM
14

Call Facebook. Delete the gym. Hit a lawyer
/r/MensRights17/03/15 06:08 AM
5

I find it ironic that Disney also has a villain specifically saying "When everyone's super, (insert evil laugh here) no one will be." They're basically fulfilling their own prophecy. Side note, how awesome is The Incredibles?
/r/MensRights17/03/15 05:07 AM
9

No, it just means they're strong women who know what they want. Duh. /s
/r/MensRights09/03/15 06:25 PM
11

Also that women are the primary victims of war. Thanks, Hilary.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 06:14 PM
24

"What? We were up front about it!" -Ruby Tuesday, because apparently that makes it okay. What? We were up front about not hiring blacks!
/r/MensRights08/03/15 06:01 PM
8

Yes, end the first paragraph insulting your reader. that's a GREAT way to keep them reading and prove you're not a psycho bitch!
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:40 PM
2

Careful what you wish for
/r/MensRights06/03/15 05:09 PM
1

Second.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 06:24 AM
5

There's barely a comparison. When some feminist calls all men rapists, THATS when you would use "notallmen." Saying "some driver ran me over" isn't trying to vilify an entire population, it's explaining a situation. The two aren't the same thing, they'll never be the same thing.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 07:38 AM
4

"Previously known simply as misogynists..." Yes, because pointing out that society is unfair to men in several ways is anti-women.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 03:53 AM
25

How is that involuntary manslaughter? She purposefully tried to convince him to kill himself. She may not have done the killing, but it was in no way involuntary.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 03:51 AM
2

Yeah, I honestly don't know why it's always fat girls crying rape... At least, they're the ones we hear about
/r/MensRights28/02/15 01:07 AM
1

Its view is just a bit out of date, I guess. Video games used to be for the "outcast" nerds. I wasn't necessarily picked on for playing video games, but people at school would look at me like I was crazy when I brought it up. And that was 15 years ago
/r/MensRights25/02/15 10:31 AM
1

Goes to show that they care about nothing but jerking themselves off.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 06:40 PM
52

Completely ruin a man's life a few little words, for no real reason, and get less than two years in prison. How is that fair?
/r/MensRights24/02/15 03:42 PM
1

Well, you can,but you're on the wrong website. You need tumblr for that kind of hipocrisy.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 08:51 PM
4

Same with what's her face talking about Alzheimer's. But those should get a mention, at most, not an entire soapbox speech.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 04:18 PM
38

My wife and I had a few friends over to watch the Oscars, and all anybody had to say about it was "you're thanking people. It's NOT soapbox to preach about whatever social bullshit you've attached yourself to this week. Say thanks and shut up." of course, none of the winners would heed this advice, even if they could hear it. Edit: one of the speeches mentioned how voters rights (i think black people's voting rights in particular) were in danger, can anybody give me any proof that that's the cas…
/r/MensRights23/02/15 06:07 AM
3

Unfortunately, I give it three weeks to be shut down due to "sexism."
/r/MensRights20/02/15 10:46 PM
3

I see what you did there.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 05:47 AM
5

At first, I thought it said "Onion," and I was like, I'm pretty sure they know everything...
/r/MensRights18/02/15 07:42 PM
6

So they should just completely ignore opportunities to do their job, huh?
/r/MensRights18/02/15 06:36 PM
3

Can men be objectified? Yes. End of article. Question isn't, "how does male privilege affect being objectified?" It's "CAN men be objectified?" and since they can, the answer the answer is yes. Nothing more to discuss.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 08:21 AM
2

Have you tried growing some tits?
/r/MensRights18/02/15 06:53 AM
3

Except that he was cleared of charges by two different courts. So not only is he not an alleged rapist anymore (not that the crazies would let you know that), he can't be tried again. Yeah? Double jeopardy, unless you have to actually go trial. So people just need to shut up about it, and she can put her fucking mattress away.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 04:52 AM
2

Probably the biggest of circlejerks
/r/MensRights15/02/15 08:38 PM
4

So his experience doesn't cheapen the experiences of women, yeah? Okay, cool. But he shouldn't bring it up anyway? Yeah, you lost me there.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 10:00 AM
1

I get that it's not this simple, but she asked if he had a condom. She may be completely wasted, but she apparently wants it.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 05:14 AM
3

Not like 1 in 3 women are dying from it, either. And every October, nothing else matters but breast cancer.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 11:25 PM
2

I still just can't get over the fact that she carries a mattress everywhere. she very likely just looks fucking ridiculous, and people have no clue what she's doing. At least until she yells at them about it.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 05:53 PM
4

You are forgiven.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 04:43 AM
2

I hate, hate to do it, but... crumbs
/r/MensRights10/02/15 04:22 AM
3

mental health issues played a part in these accusations. Ok, sure. I can believe that. But that still doesn't mean that magically, they were raped. if the evidence says no, there was no rape. That's how things work.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 07:04 AM
35

[Citation needed]
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:46 PM
33

I could be wrong, but I think calling them survivors is stupid. "survivor" implies something should have killed them. Far as I know, rape is not a very common cause of death. Victim is perfect for this situation (you know, except that she lied), and yet they always use survivor.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 06:29 AM
8

I love that her "sources" had the word average IN THE TITLE. Which does nothing but reinforce what she was arguing against!
/r/MensRights01/02/15 10:04 PM
129

Seriously? They publicly endorsed someone that really doesn't contribute anything?
/r/MensRights25/01/15 08:17 PM
2

Video on YouTube by adoseofbuckley about the shootings is really on point, I think. he doesn't get into the gender issue, (mostly because he doesn't really see one), he just talks about how the kid is an entitled little shit who thought he deserved everything. I'd recommend it. Link: http://youtu.be/xxe1Sdc-pJE
/r/MensRights25/01/15 03:23 PM
3

Michael Scott Edit: gilded for two words. Thank you kind stranger!
/r/MensRights25/01/15 03:18 PM
7

What was her reasoning for doing it? Did they even say?
/r/MensRights21/01/15 03:48 PM
8

Just watch, this is gonna show up on tumblr and Twitter with people taking it seriously. God, I hope it does.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 05:33 PM
3

Except that they can't please women, therefore lesbians.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 07:27 PM
27

Yeah but the feminists are the ones doing it. So it's okay.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 10:40 PM
1

I've held my wife down during sex. She likes it rough. Does that mean I raped her? Apparently yes. Lock me up, boys!
/r/MensRights11/01/15 07:03 PM
2

I've always loved that joke. Nooo! Noooo! Noooooooh I see what you're driving at.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 05:46 PM
7

So all Christians are now nutjobs, too? Yeah, i can totally see a psycho feminist claiming that.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 03:12 AM
4

As someone who's doesn't get the "artsy" bullshit in movies, I can at least appreciate that there's different subjects and genres of movies. So I am one step ahead of these idiots.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 08:36 AM
2

In all honesty, who wouldn't want to date Zuul? It's a demigod in Sigourney Weavers body!
/r/MensRights21/12/14 10:08 AM
2

How long until they realize they're advocating for allowing white drivers to refuse service to non-whites? They're too busy pandering to have an actual thought about their business model.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 09:53 AM
5

I had the same question. He wasn't even CHARGED, and it showed up. What the hell is the point of that?
/r/MensRights21/12/14 08:35 AM
2

Pretty damn impressive, too.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 05:08 AM
0

Yep, that's definitely a case of red flag
/r/MensRights19/12/14 07:11 AM
6

Doesn't help that they call her "long-suffering." We know exactly which horse they're backing here
/r/MensRights19/12/14 06:50 AM
0

I don't know if a miscarriage is an instant red flag, but coupled with other suspicions, it certainly could be
/r/MensRights19/12/14 06:43 AM
14

But yes, feminists and SJWs are totally not the bad guys here. Not in the slightest.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 06:00 AM
6

What do you mean possible? His very existence is a major safety violation!
/r/MensRights13/12/14 12:46 AM
2

Strangely, it does
/r/MensRights11/12/14 05:59 AM
2

Is that a dude holding the "fight the patricarchy" sign? how fucking white knight can you get?
/r/MensRights06/12/14 07:27 AM
1

I don't know if sucked is the right word, but definitely nowhere near as good as the Prime trilogy.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 07:06 AM
3

Pfff we all know Title IX only protects women... In all seriousness, I know it's meant to protect both men and women, but does anybody have any examples of it protecting men?
/r/MensRights05/12/14 01:41 AM
1

I can tell you right now, all that's at Target is Sims 3, Goat Simulator, and a whole bunch of shitty Nancy Drew hidden object games.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 02:42 AM
2

You debated looking up how to spell gamer?
/r/MensRights04/12/14 02:41 AM
7

Exact same thing about left 4 dead 2 because it was set in Louisiana. Black people live in Louisiana. Oh, wait, black zombies? Racist!
/r/MensRights04/12/14 02:40 AM
21

A) False rape accusers are pursued aggressively? Yeah, I'll believe that when I fucking see it. B) These people are ruining other people's lives with three little words, and you're defending them? Fuck me sideways.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 04:09 PM
1

Diamonds in rings aren't big enough to be lethal like that. Can opener, maybe. If you're fucking MacGyver.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 09:25 PM
4

Shit, I hope so.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 04:48 PM
2

The point being made is diamonds don't have any practical value, at least in the sizes we like for jewelry. So if the money system goes completely to shit, you're left with a shiny rock that does fuck-all
/r/MensRights30/11/14 09:05 AM
5

And because there's SO many more men than women on campuses. Take the school back from the patriarchy, ladies! /s
/r/MensRights30/11/14 09:03 AM
3

That's what has always confused me. To meet your arbitrary standards, you're going to essentially take agency away from women and force them into this field because it'll make you look good? Yeah, no, that makes perfect sense.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 07:59 AM
10

I hope that in the coming election, people realize that Hillary is anti-man. "she just misspoke!" Yeah, how many times has that happened without the speaker being forgiven? why should Hillary be the exception?
/r/MensRights24/11/14 08:59 AM
1

"I don't think I'm rude" Oh, well then that obviously means you aren't rude. Doesn't matter that we have proof on the internet and several accounts of your rudeness, if you think you aren't rude, then you're not rude. Because that's how life works
/r/MensRights22/11/14 05:20 PM
30

Let's be honest, though... Who the fuck has ever thought neck tattoos were a good idea?
/r/MensRights20/11/14 03:00 PM
3

Not sexy enough? Hell, I'd fuck her bangs /s
/r/MensRights20/11/14 02:47 PM
2

She did. She just got lucky in her misspelling
/r/MensRights18/11/14 09:18 PM
1

By the way, my wife loves your username.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 01:43 AM
8

Doxxing is posting private information about someone on the internet, and ddos stands for "distributed denial of service." Basically, you set up bots and overload a websites servers, effectively shutting them down for a while. Ddos attacks are frustrating and annoying, to be sure, but they're not dangerous like doxxing potentially is.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 11:32 PM
42

Ddos attacks and doxxing are two different things. I think you just misread.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 11:12 PM
3

Fuck. Gender equality in STEM is ridiculous. How long is it going to take people before they realize that not that many women really want to be a scientist? they're out there, but they don't need convincing. Stop trying to shove women into the sciences just to even it out.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 03:28 AM
1

It's not like the results would mean anything. The other words that have been "banned" are still all over the damn place. It's more or less a fun poll to see what people think.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:51 AM
1

Dox everybody there, death threats, and a ball pit. Pretty much everything they have.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:50 AM
11

Pff science. Just lies made up by the patriarchy to keep strong wymyn down. Fuck you and your shitlord logic! /s
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:45 AM
3

Never seen that before, it is completely a perfect parallel.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:43 AM
6

URL is total bullshit, that's for sure.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 08:54 AM
1

Wanting it or not, the point all of these idiots miss is it's ILLEGAL to have sex with someone under the age of 18. So even if the kid did want it (and I'm not saying he did) it's illegal either way, making their point retarded.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 05:42 PM
8

What the fuck? Why shouldn't fathers be allowed to take their kids to the doctor, whether or not they're married?
/r/MensRights07/11/14 05:43 PM
2

Didn't cause any physical damage? She sprayed him with mace the entire time they were kicking the shit out of him.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 01:31 AM
1

As a whole, yeah, but I find my personal relationships are better. Things between my wife and me are great, and I've got some female friends at work. I'd say it's mostly an "at-large" view that shows things are fucked yp
/r/MensRights01/11/14 07:25 PM
4

You mean they don't call you using their cat?
/r/MensRights01/11/14 07:15 PM
2

It's only victim blaming if he "victim" is a woman. If it's a man, then we can't believe a single word he says.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 11:00 PM
3

That's right. We males instantly get recognition in the news! Whooo!
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:59 PM
2

At the very least, all the media attention would be on any crimes committed during that male uprising, completely ignoring the point of the protest.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 04:49 AM
7

And the media FINALLY uses the word rape. About fucking time!
/r/MensRights27/10/14 11:00 AM
-1

I'd totally vote for Chris Christie. ESPECIALLY if it's really Bobby Moynihan playing Chris Christie.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 10:02 PM
10

And they admit it in the first couple paragraphs, even though they did it jokingly.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 06:32 PM
11

Pretty sure getting people fired over something like this IS feminism. Big chunk of it, anyway.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 06:30 PM
2

Didn't even finish the article, and came here. Not at all surprised to see it posted.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 06:29 PM
59

A column that actually makes sense and tells it like it is when it comes to a threat against men? better post it on Jezebel, people will enjoy it over there.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 03:42 PM
2

Leather burn from scooching three seats over? Really?
/r/MensRights18/09/14 04:38 AM
1

Probably not a bad idea. Put it out of its goddamn misery.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 04:37 AM
3

What the fuck, how is that legal?
/r/MensRights18/09/14 03:15 AM
3

We are all rapists now You mean we weren't before?
/r/MensRights18/09/14 01:19 AM
3

I don't even understand what the point of the article is. People play video games, big fucking whoop. Who the hell cares if they're men or women?
/r/MensRights17/09/14 03:43 PM
16

So, if the baby was a girl, then it would be totally fine if it was cis? That makes no damn sense whatsoever.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 03:58 AM
3

Because trying to find evidence of your innocence is always and completely proof that you've been framed and people are out to get you. Yeah, makes sense.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 10:10 PM
1

What, you think all rape should be tried the same? I can see merits to both ways...
/r/MensRights13/09/14 09:11 PM
8

Yeah, I didn't understand that either. I wasn't aware there were degrees of rape, like the degrees of murder
/r/MensRights13/09/14 05:11 PM
1

I'm sorry, but rape is 71k bail, and murder is only 60k? That doesn't make any sense.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 06:40 AM
10

How in the hell do they still not grasp that "reverse sexism" = sexism? They're the same damn thing. Not that hard.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 03:25 AM
-5

The only thing was charged with was endangering children? Come on, massive miscarriage of justice.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 12:11 AM
1

How in the hell can she just basically tell the HR person to fuck off and not get in huge trouble? I realize she didn't use those words, but brushing it off is just ridiculous.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 06:44 AM
10

One day a month for two hours. Still, it's a start!
/r/MensRights01/08/14 08:03 PM
88

she Key word, right there.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 07:58 PM
2

How in the hell is that defamation, anyway?
/r/MensRights27/07/14 04:11 PM
0

I don't know if it's purposely trying to screw over boys, but it definitely does sound like they're giving tons more consideration to girls, and screwing boys in the process.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 04:43 PM
3

I totally get that, but what are they doing that's considered racist? Sexist I can kinda understand, but they're not doing anything that has to do with race.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 10:42 PM
3

Brownie points? Now THAT sounds racist.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 10:42 PM
7

Where does racism come in? She looks white to me.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 06:45 PM
2

I fully expect to have raped several woman by next Sunday.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:24 AM
1

Am I the only one that finds it ironic that a dude wrote this thing, but is telling people to stay away from the conference? A conference that could potentially directly benefit him, no less.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 06:29 PM
1

Wait, someone actually told you about that machine? and they thought it was real?
/r/MensRights20/06/14 02:35 PM
1

I guess? They'll just make fun of and shame you for not being a complete man in that case. So good luck with that.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 10:47 PM
2

It wouldn't. But at least you'd have a stronger case. If you're not having sex with anyone, people can vouch for you on that. I guess they'll just say that means that you'll take it out on someone and rape them since you're not getting any elsewhere... Dammit, I think we're screwed.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 07:40 PM
4

who cannot be named Horseshit. News sources always go out of their way name any male whos done something wrong, even when it's not proven.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 02:52 PM
48

Well, come on, fart noises are literally the funniest thing ever. is it any surprise that dad's win?
/r/MensRights15/06/14 07:20 PM
3

Thoroughly enjoyed that, actually. Just the facts, and calling out the bullshitters. Love it.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 07:35 PM
0

She does realize that being paid for sex (considering that's how she worded it. I could be assuming and in the wrong here) essentially means she's a prostitute. Which is illegal in the vast majority of the US. Again, I could be assuming, but aside from the ethical issues, she's breaking the law, apparently on a regular basis. Probably shoulda brought that up, too.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:42 AM
8

She waited five months because it's bullshit. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 07:33 PM
1

What the hell is their logic to justify that?
/r/MensRights05/05/14 02:44 PM
5

One that doesn't give a shit about men in any way other than as disposable labor.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 08:14 PM
17

Am I the only one who completely disregards any argument that includes the words "rape culture?" It's like they can't even come up with a real reason to fight for their point.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 10:12 PM
6

Reading this infographic on the couch next to my fiancee, and she told me to send it to her. She loves this kind of thing.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 02:38 AM
23

Doesn't. But when it's mentioned multiple times in an article, you'd think it'd at least be close to the truth.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 03:13 PM
15

How in the hell is she an Angelina Jolie "lookalike"? Doesn't look anything like her...
/r/MensRights12/04/14 03:07 PM
7

Especially if you're rich AND female.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 03:05 PM
4

Sounds about right. Goddammit, media.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 06:23 AM
3

Actual, rational human beings can admit they're wrong, or didn't have all the information. It's really refreshing when you meet someone like /u/saint2e on here. Really nice change of pace.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 06:17 AM
2

People have bought into the lie so much. I was talking to a coworker about it the other day, and I brought up that it's a lie, and he VEHEMENTLY denied it, and kinda started getting upset. All I did was try to add in the extra details that prove it's a lie. Love the dude, he's a good friend, just refused to listen.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:31 PM
1

Winter is just as bad for my allergies as the rest of the year, plus its cold. So fuck winter. Sorry I can't agree with you, friend.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 06:07 PM
79

Only if it's a woman's. Not if it's a male life, or an unborn fetus, but that's an entirely other discussion. Point is, only women are important, and nothing else matters. /s
/r/MensRights21/03/14 07:28 PM
0

Yeah, sounds about right. I never heard it, Mormon parents.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 01:42 AM
1

So.. the point of this is to just not get married period?
/r/MensRights11/03/14 10:12 PM
15

There's a campaign going on to try to stop people calling little girls "bossy" when they're pushy. Supposedly, when little boys are pushy, it's called "leadership" or something, and girls are "bossy." It's a bunch of horseshit. I say if they're being overly pushy to get something, don't get it for them. Teach them to not be a prick.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 10:10 PM
2

That's what I want to know. It's still discrimination, since one sex gets a cheaper price than the other. But since it's against men, I guess the law doesn't care.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 12:40 AM
5

Yeah, sounds about right.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 05:18 PM
30

I can't help but notice it says the lawsuit "only presents one side of the story." I've never seen that phrase when a woman is suing for wrongful termination.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 06:25 PM
2

Or at the very least, idiots didn't try their best to scream their stupid opinions from the mountaintops.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 06:08 AM
8

Dilbert is always a great choice, no matter the situation.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 08:49 AM
48

I don't know if WOMEN did, but feminism is definitely the culprit. If women can do everything men can do, they why should men bother doing it for them?
/r/MensRights09/01/14 04:17 PM
2

Interesting read, kinda infuriating, but you could not pay me enough money to click those picture links... WAY too damn risky.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 02:40 PM
2

I like that. Other countries should adopt that terminology, it's just much more clear.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:57 PM
1

That's horseshit. How do people get away with this?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:50 PM
3

Because being blind is a billion times worse than having a mental disability. That makes sense.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 08:23 AM
1

White dude, (which pretty much screwed me from the beginning), got a 145. Even though I'm straight up broke, in debt, and struggling to get through college. But I'm super privileged, so I got that going for me, which is nice.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 08:20 AM
1

I was just talking to my girlfriend about this exact thing yesterday! We've been together for only about a month, but a couple marriage-related things have come up, and I brought up that this exact thing would piss me off to no end. And she agreed that if we do get married eventually, she'd make sure I had a say in things. So I got going for me, which is nice.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 01:13 PM
3

Feminists don't bring it up because it doesn't negatively affect them. So they don't care. I'm sure you've noticed that evrything they protest is "inequality" towards women, they won't say anything if it's men that are being disadvantaged. That's pretty much their definition of equality.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 12:50 AM
3

Yes, only young girls are invisible during disasters. Because you see young boys EVERYWHERE during earthquakes and floods.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 12:18 AM
1

Hell YES it bothers me. The whole idea of girls get their own everything, but they can also use the things targeted at boys too, if they want, has always bugged me. Not that I have a personal stake in it, it's just the hypocrisy and double-standards that piss me off.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 12:33 AM
1

As much as I love watching To Catch A Predator (I actually find it really entertaining to watch the dude's reactions when they get caught), to me, it seems like they targeted men specifically. It could just be part of the selection bias or something that ruled out women. I'm willing to bet it had something to do with the search for rubes to pull in.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 10:25 PM
3

If he's LUCKY he's looking at 25 years. I wouldn't be surprised if it's much, much longer.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 10:23 PM
0

Gotta love how it took the family time to figure out if they wanted to press charges, because he's on the football team. If it WAS rape (hint: it likely wasn't), they would have gone to the authorities immediately. I've never once heard of someone think about reporting it because of the accused's status. Out of fear, yes. Never out of implications because of fame or anything like that.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 10:00 AM
5

The fact that people are excited about this just makes me shake my head. How in the world is that even considered a good idea?
/r/MensRights06/11/13 03:42 AM
7

At the very least, none ever pass him.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 01:52 PM
1

Is "white knight" a term that is ever used with a positive meaning? I've only really ever heard it used to describe those who are basically male apologists.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 01:52 PM
2

I love that things like this are getting exposure. But how much you wanna bet she gets off easy?
/r/MensRights05/11/13 01:44 PM
8

I saw something about this earlier, and that's the part that REALLY pissed me off. If some guys did the opposite and antagonized women, there would be protests, lawsuits, and probably multiple death threats. But since it's women, meh, they can do what they want. And then I just now found out it's funded by tax money. THAT really steams me big time. How could ANYBODY be okay with that?
/r/MensRights01/11/13 10:49 AM
4

Because having a few guys grow mustaches is crazy offensive, but vomiting pink on absolutely EVERYTHING for an entire month is perfectly acceptable, and if you think otherwise, you're obviously sexist.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 02:55 AM
15

It's more the fact that women get offended when the only pronoun used is "him" or "he," but it's perfectly acceptable to use "her" and exclude "him." That's the issue. If feminists are working towards "equality," that means that men are on equal ground with women. Not that women are on a higher level, like many of them want.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 03:36 AM
1

One issue I see is how many feminist rallies are being taken seriously? I get that because they're women, and there's a lot of them, and they're pissed off, people listen, but aren't they seen as a joke in many cases, because the things they're protesting are just so ridiculous, and their methods are pretty screwed up? Wouldn't a huge MR rally be seen as the same, and potentially even worse?
/r/MensRights17/10/13 04:36 AM
0

Dude, I hear that. I'm fucking sick of it. I get that us guys have "Movember" but as far as i know, that's popped up only in the past years. Whereas the breast cancer "movement" has been around for forever and a half. Trust me, we're all pretty fucking aware that breast cancer is a thing. Can we PLEASE not have absolutely everything be pink? The NFL being covered in pink the entirety of October is absolutely ridiculous.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 05:04 AM
24

The point is that it was a women supporting women group. Which, in many cases, is the same thing as saying "fuck guys, we don't need them." So how does it make sense to be trying to tell women that they don't need men, while getting funding FROM men? That's a little bit contradictory.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 09:18 PM
8

That's the same stance that some people take on racism. Still doesn't make any sense.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 12:10 AM
4

Is it just me, or does the media always make sure they say "allegedly" when they're talking about crimes women have committed, but don't bother giving the same courtesy to men? Soon as they hear about it, they assume the man is guilty and just run with it.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 04:35 PM
-6

I agree with you whole-heartedly. I was circumcised as a baby (I'm Mormon, not Jewish, so it's not really a cultural thing), and I can't say I've missed out on anything, really. It's all I've known, and whatever, I'm happy with it. My wang still works just fine, and sex is still very enjoyable. No big deal.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 12:58 AM
-3

Well, since you broke up with her, it's OBVIOUS that you're a controlling, evil man, and it's all your fault. It couldn't possibly be because of her. EDIT: Spelling
/r/MensRights16/08/13 10:04 PM
3

As much as I want to say OP could sue, no court would ever hear the case. Since when do men win civil rights cases on the basis of sexism?
/r/MensRights02/08/13 08:53 PM
1

In California, there are generally male volleyball teams in high school. So softball could be an issue, if a guy isn't good enough to be on the baseball team, so he wants to be the best player on the softball team, but that's about it. As far as I know, all the other sports, with the exception of football, has a male and female option.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 09:13 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter