bleu_gascon Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
0	Frida Ghitis blurts it out... I'm sorry, I am forced to conclude you have no further way of arguing your point effectively. Also, don't think you are supported by anyone else in this subreddit, so you should say "hope you had fun trolling me." It was pretty fun and easy too, you dummy.	/r/MensRights	27/04/12 03:42 AM
1	Frida Ghitis blurts it out... How does you speaking in Latin cast any doubt on my argument. Use some common sense, of course men are going to be involved in violence. Whether or not it is perpetrated by the opposite gender is the only thing relevant. Mens Rights infers that Men need to be protected from women. Thats ridiculous.	/r/MensRights	27/04/12 12:16 AM
1	Frida Ghitis blurts it out... Where is it, in your link to wikipedia, that states that women earning less than men is a common misconception. How are these things false? Also, just because you know several phrases in Latin, doesn't support any of your claims. Also, false isn't perfectly accurate. Also, you are a pretentious weirdo who finds pleasure in being a domineering male. Would hate to be your partner, you could be gay after all.	/r/MensRights	26/04/12 11:39 PM
1	Frida Ghitis blurts it out... Then why make the distinction between genders, if you want to "see services and support for domestic violence go to all victims of DV, not just victims of one gender." You just repudiated the basis of this subreddit and women advocacy groups, why further segregate the difference between men's and women's rights if you want to dissolve supporting a single gender.	/r/MensRights	25/04/12 11:26 PM
1	Frida Ghitis blurts it out... yet it still exists, and they are subscribers to mens rights. There insults are also indicative or how mens rights is motivated. YOu may not call her a dyke, but there's an obvious animosity towards outspoken woman and talk about being abused by men.	/r/MensRights	25/04/12 08:37 PM
-1	Frida Ghitis blurts it out... Because I don't cite specific sources doesn't mean what I say is false. This is a casual public forum, I am not going to write an essay. I can't help but feel that you are being disingenuous in subscribing to mens rights because you actually feel threatened. It's really just a response to your fear of feminists. It's common and widely available knowledge that woman ear less, are subject to rape more often, and are victim to a plethora of other assaults from men. And saying that domestic abuse me…	/r/MensRights	25/04/12 08:21 PM
-3	Frida Ghitis blurts it out... Not nearly as severely or as frequently as women who are abused by men, plus they are abused on an institutional level. Men govern society, they are the ones typically in power. This isn't a society ruled by women, that's why the idea of Men's Rights in response to Women's Rights is ridiculous. Obviously men should have rights, but there's very few incidents where their rights are being compromised compared to the extent the rights of women.	/r/MensRights	25/04/12 07:03 PM
-4	Frida Ghitis blurts it out... This from someone who spends most of his time in this retarded subreddit, and then whenever someone points that out, he maliciously stalks their history comment history to try and humiliate them. I hope you are humiliated.	/r/MensRights	25/04/12 06:30 PM
-5	Frida Ghitis blurts it out... Do you idiots actually believe that men receive poorer treatment than woman in society. Women are subjugated by men, it's not the other way around. There may be some gender-roles that are stupid, but this subreddit's purpose seems solely to oppose feminists, which has nothing to do with any relevant problems. I don't even know who Frida Ghitis is, but you all seem to act like Manchildren, especially when you start to make fun of her looks and her sexual orientation.	/r/MensRights	25/04/12 06:24 PM