TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

blewpah Archive

View 0 posts and 59 comments by blewpah on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

You make decent points. Maybe I was too quick in throwing 'incel' around, although the way that comment was worded to me reads a lot more closely to the cringeyness you're describing than the way you're discussing this.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/20 06:57 PM
1

Dating site data indicates that the average desirability of men increases with age while that of women peaks in their late 20s and only goes down from there. While desirability encompasses more than looks, it ultimately fuels the concept of a "wall" - a time limit women, moreso than men, are racing against. Data can be very readily manipulated or interpreted and presented to draw whatever conclusions someone wants to come to. And even in the case that this is true the problem I have is basing so…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/20 05:48 PM
1

How attractive someone is and how well they age depends on the person. Plenty of women look great in their 40's. Plenty of men don't. And vise versa. The whole redpill / incel mentalities about sex, dating, and relationships are horrendously toxic. Relationships aren't competitions (at least, not good ones) and people trying to devalue women (or men) to give themselves and "edge" are really sad.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/20 05:31 PM
-2

Yeah you explained it except it's dumb incel / redpill bullshit lol. You hurt my feelings I doubt it.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/20 03:11 PM
1

Kinda. They're both really hateful towards women (and oftentimes men who aren't like them) but incels are a lot more depressed and self loathing. Redpillers are kinda like pickup artists. It's all about how to be better at sex and dating and life. Incels kinda reject that. That's kind of part of the issue with the whole redpill thing is that it presents itself with a lot of legitimate self help and self improvement at the start, but then it sucks people into this toxic mindset that relationships…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/20 03:05 PM
-5

This is such a fuckin incel comment lmao.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/20 02:21 PM
2

More like female redpillers.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/20 02:19 PM
1

Uhh Cosby didn't just drug women. Why did it leave out that he also raped those women?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/20 01:01 PM
0

No, it isn't. Your echo chamber strawman of it is.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/12/19 10:08 PM
8

That's exactly how it happens.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/19 09:54 AM
0

Do you think people tend to get lighter sentences because they're black?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/18 07:35 PM
1

The only chance that a mother has to legally opt out of parenthood is abortion. There isn't any reasonable way to provide that to a father though, obviously her having a child or aborting one because of the father's wishes doesn't make sense. That's unfortunate, but it's just a fact of life. When it comes to adoption, mothers can put their kids up for adoption when they are single mothers. If a mother put her child up for adoption without the knowledge of the father she'd get in a lot of trouble…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 08:54 PM
1

As I said, you're comparing two different situations, one in which a mother is soley responsible for a child, the other in which a father is being obliged to help provide for his child that some one else is raising. They're different. Is it that hard to understand?
/r/MensRights15/07/17 05:17 PM
-15

None of that changes the fact that women are legally obliged to take care of their children. That's the assertion I was making.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:31 PM
-10

You're comparing two different situations. If a single father is trying to raise a kid and doesn't have money they don't put him in jail, and there are government programs to help them. If a single father is raising a child, the mother is legally responsible for providing child support.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:27 PM
-16

Women are also legally obliged to take care of their children.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:06 PM
1

The first line in the original image is talking about menstruation. No one changed the subject to it, it was relevant to the original post.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 12:21 AM
2

The old testament has a lot of stuff against menstruation. In Leviticus it says when a woman has a period she's considered "unclean" And anywhere she sits or lays down and anyone she touches become "unclean". The process for woman becoming clean involves catching a small bird and bringing it to a priest to be ritually sacrificed. Obviously very few if any Jews and Christians still practice that stuff, but it is in the bible.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 12:17 AM
1

I'm sure that's happened before but you're talking about a single case. You're telling me that judge that sentenced your friend to four years wouldn't have given this girl were talking about jail time?
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:17 AM
27

She didn't say anything indicating Feminism.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 11:17 PM
6

A wasted 18 year old boy with no previous record would almost definitely not go to jail for this either.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 11:15 PM
1

I'm absolutely not saying that either is OK. I'm just saying that FGM is generally more harmful to the victim than circumcision is. Cutting off the foreskin is not the same as cutting out the clitoris and the clitoral hood.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 02:07 PM
1

Yes but it's a considerably less invasive and dangerous procedure for boys than it is for girls.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:41 AM
0

I mean bad stuff happens with male circumcision sure, but with FGM it's a lot more likely to be much worse. We're talking about people with no medical training and dirty hands using broken glass to cut out a girls clitoris in a mud hut yaknow.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 10:50 PM
46

Also its generally done in very poor conditions by people with no medical training.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 10:14 PM
1

/r/badfaketexts
/r/MGTOW23/02/17 02:41 AM
0

Those aren't mutually exclusive.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/17 02:34 AM
-1

I disagree. Should someone who falsely accuses someone else of murder get charged with murder? No, they should get charged with falsely accusing someone of murder, whatever that entails. If they didn't commit a murder they shouldn't get charged with it, if they didn't commit rape they shouldn't get charged with that either.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/17 02:32 AM
2

Except it was literally and figuratively a response to the strawman argument that criticizing feminists means you're "at war with women". This is not something that's said literally and was just a specific response. This was that post. "This is dumb, but it's not a Men's Rights thing. Men's Rights are not at war with Women's." I have no fucking idea where you're getting it that this guy is saying criticizing feminists means you're at war with women. Your personal experience in this case is "femi…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 11:12 PM
1

Cool beans.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 06:08 PM
1

So you think there's some kind of misandrist conspiracy in our media? But you don't think sexism against women that happens or needs to be a concern at all?
/r/MensRights19/12/16 06:07 PM
2

It was in response to the whole "MRA's can't criticize feminists otherwise they're at war with women" bullshit argument. No it wasn't. "This is dumb, but it's not a Men's Rights thing. Men's Rights are not at war with Women's." "Feminists are at war with men though" That was the exchange before we came in. Sorry but that's just not true. It's a myth spread by feminists to justify their hate of MRA's. Feminists would definitely say there's much more sexism among the MRM than there is among Femini…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 06:05 PM
3

The historical record of feminist activism according to your echo chamber which does everything to compile everything it's ever done wrong. No, I don't have the counter examples to that, but people in the opposing echo chamber probably do. Do you think there aren't lists of bad things done in the name of MRM just because I don't have them handy?
/r/MensRights19/12/16 03:26 AM
1

The latter.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 03:24 AM
3

No one is saying all of feminism is at war with men The guy I originally responded to said "Feminists are at war with men" But the key difference between my comment and that hypothetical comment is that my comment is based on the truth. I'm not sure how to respond to that. Funny because I've spent good time on both MRA subs and feminists subs and that's just not the truth. Yeah, I disagree. There's sexism on both kinds of subs of about equal amounts and it's encouraged by about equal amounts fro…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 03:08 AM
3

Ask them over on /r/feminism, I'm absolutely sure they have lists of all the bad things that have been done in the name of MRM. I'm not on either side and I don't spend my time compiling lists of what either movement has done wrong, I'm speaking strictly from my personal experience.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 02:48 AM
0

Yes, I'm aware, thank you.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 02:17 AM
0

Equating all of feminism to one subreddit and claiming feminism as a whole is at war with men because you think that one subreddit is is about as much of a strawman as you can get. But feminism does not empower misandrists like the MRM empowers mysoginists. Therefore calling out MRM whenever possible is perfectly fine and in a good number of cases actually serving to better the rights of men. That reads just like a comment out of /r/feminism. Does it sound familiar? I honestly can't tell a diffe…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 02:15 AM
13

Not as a whole. Some are. But some MRA's are at war with women too.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 11:30 PM
2

And if you never told the other person the gun was fake and did the same thing (with them thinking it was a real gun) it would still be illegal, even though they weren't in danger. (also, role* play)
/r/MensRights18/12/16 11:29 PM
0

No, you're taking it out of context. She was definitely not explicitly saying use of those particular phrases were harassment, she was talking generally about people sending personally rude and offensive messages on a daily basis, and making videos and using other mediums to insult her. She used those words to describe it, but her point wasn't about those specific words. Semantics aside, her entire argument is that something doesn't need to be violent or threatening to qualify as harassment. Do …
/r/MensRights07/10/15 10:29 PM
1

This is the quote you're talking about as far as I can find through google: I have been the target for 3 years nonstop of egregious online harassment in all levels. I think it’s important to recognize that harassment is, as someone had mentioned, it’s not just what is legal and illegal, right? Harassment is threats of violence, but it’s also the day to day grind of “you’re a liar,” “you suck,” making all these hate videos to attack us on a regular basis, and the mobs that come from those hate vi…
/r/MensRights02/10/15 11:43 PM
1

Do you really think 'you suck!' was the extent of what they were talking about?
/r/MensRights02/10/15 11:00 PM
1

whilst feminists make the mistake of broad generalizations we shouldn't fall into the same trap. I know we are better than that. ... feminists make the mistake of broad generalizations I know we are better than that. uhh.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 10:50 PM
5

Feeling guilt after doing something to hurt someone for fun isn't being a fag, that's called having a conscience.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/15 01:43 AM
1

Intention is a big factor in determining how bad a crime is. Off the top of my head I can think of five different designations for killing or being involved in killing a person (1st, 2nd, 3rd degree murder, voluntary and involuntary manslaughter). Similarly intention of harming or scaring someone because they're black, or because they're gay, or whatever is different than just doing that to anyone for no reason. It's not about the victim being a minority, it's the intention of the offender. Ther…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/15 04:14 PM
1

Listen, it's childish and it screams of insecurity to refuse to call someone what they ask to be called.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/15 03:28 PM
0

It's not that I think we must legally force people to 'be nice'. I don't think laws about discrimination or anything should affect individuals (unless they're committing hate crimes or harassing people). Short of that, I don't think the government can come into play. If a racist doesn't want asians on his property, I find that detestable and sad, but he's within his legal rights. The problem here is that this doesn't apply to businesses and organizations. Businesses have to allow everyone to equ…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/15 01:47 AM
1

Race and sexual orientation are both just aspects of the way people are. Like nationality, religion, whatever. No one is saying those specific situations are equal. My point was that discrimination against gay people is discrimination just the same as when it's against black people, so these businesses should be getting sued for doing so. Liberalization isn't always a bad thing. We needed it to deal with slavery and segregation, we needed it to give women the right to vote. Now we need it so tha…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/15 12:52 AM
2

Those are examples of businesses choosing not to associate with customers because of their sexual orientation, which is discrimination. If you think that's okay, then you also have to accept restaurants in the 60's refusing to serve specific races. THAT'S what this is analogous to. It's all discrimination. Maybe you do think it's okay, but I think discrimination is bad. Doesn't matter what it's about.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/15 11:40 PM
-1

It's more of a respect thing really. If a dwarf asked you not to call them 'midget' and you go and call them 'midget', you're an asshole. It's just disrespectful and immature to make a point of calling someone anything they don't want to be called. Thats the biggest thing I take from it.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/15 11:29 PM
-1

Sex is not a social construct. Gender is entirely a social construct. It's a societal construct based off sex.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/15 11:23 PM
1

I don't like it either, but it's not a double standard if it's two different organizations. If the same company fired a man for defending FHRITP, and wouldn't fire Sharon or whatever the case may be, that'd be a double standard. This is just two different standards, as unpleasant as it is.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 08:49 PM
-5

I mean yeah, when you're talking about gender specific issues, things aren't the exact same. I was trying to construct a comparable metaphor. And i never said you liked anything or that sexual objectification of men is okay, so you're putting words in my mouth there. really? That's so hard to believe for me. Its rude and disrespectful so who the joke is about doesn't entirely matter. Like if someone made a running gag out of coming into your office and spitting at your feet, you'd be cool with t…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:09 AM
2

She was clapping too. And her expression was normal.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:36 AM
-6

Men aren't objectified sexually as much as women are, normally they're objectified financially, so 'FHRITA' doesn't compare in thay way. Let me rephrase. I assume there are things people can say about men as a whole that offend you. What if someone made a big joke about one of those things (that you didn't find funny, she obviously doesn't think it is). After a year of dealing with it all the time do you think you might get tired of it and have someone explain themselves? Would doing that make y…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:26 AM
3

She took it personally because she gets that shit all the time. And it's negative towards woman so she has a place to be offended. Before you say she doesn't, how would you feel about someone saying 'get married and have his kid then get a divorce to take everything in the settlement!' And that just turned into a big meme constantly getting spouted off while you're at work. Would you be okay with that?
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:01 AM
8

Can this really be called a double standard when it's two different situations? Maybe the company that fired the guy just has higher standards when it comes to saying dumb shit.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 12:46 AM
1

You must have read a completely different thread than I did. I saw literally not one response in support of the woman or trying to justify the crime.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 04:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter