TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

blfire Archive

View 1 posts and 103 comments by blfire on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
58

Intactivismblfire/r/MensRights29/03/17 07:42 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-35

Guys. We don't know if this was a false allegation. We just know that nothing could be proven. False allegation would mean that we know that the person claiming it lied.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 01:41 PM
11

yes. Black people statistically steal more but you can't assume that the person steals.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 12:24 AM
-1

which would make the statment in the picture incorrect.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 09:37 AM
24

Or people who troll.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 04:25 PM
-1

thats like the one good thing from communism....
/r/MensRights26/04/18 08:51 PM
1

Also the average exec (non start up) is probably older and I think that woman who are 50+ really expirenced a good amount of discrimination (at least in the business area). But the "problem" will solve itself.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 11:05 PM
5

I agree that MRA should not turn into a left bashing festival, but as a lefty myself I think it is fair and even necessary to admit that the left has a problem with the SJW ideology that is gaining more and more traction. but the right has a traditionalst view which isn't that better. I see MRAs more as egalitarian.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 11:01 PM
2

I would just ignore it. It is not worth the trouble. But I would complain about it as soon as I won't see the person ever again.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 10:57 PM
1

Guys... This is obvious someone who is sarcastic. I mean i could see me posting the same. Read it with the pauses (...) again. This sounds obviously sarcastic and more like a critic.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 03:05 PM
6

If this guy is unconcess or was ever in a positionwhere he can't verbally or nonverbally communicate non-consent than it was rape.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 08:01 PM
3

Its more about woman living longer. Look at the percentage of men / woman over the age of 70. Those people probably use much more resources.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 08:28 PM
2

This might be a correlation. (like the gender pay gap) I imagine that poor and uneducated people are the most likely one to not have an father.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 08:25 PM
2

no financial freedom Arn't their laws in place that you are entitelted to a part of your partners income if you don't work?
/r/MensRights19/07/17 08:19 PM
2

It is still breitbart. Doesn't have a good reputation.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 02:53 AM
7

pussypass is not the same anymore it got taken over.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 03:35 PM
9

TLDR pls? Why didn't she get no jailtime? I mean they can't say - she is a woman no jailtime for you.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 03:32 PM
1

There is a great german one. if you speak german than just go to wikipedia and go to the source.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 10:09 PM
2

I explained to the dummy that supply and demand was the only factor determining wages. Not only. If i have made often the experience in the past that men who are 150 centimeter large don't go through with their threats than I will in the future ignore their threats. So a 150 centimeter men might be discriminated based on his height by me because of my previous experience. This is a lifesaving treat we humans developed to survive.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 10:05 PM
2

it needs also sources on the bottom which link to reliable studies.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 09:53 PM
2

FREEEEEAKY ?
/r/MensRights02/07/17 02:27 PM
23

its an american thing. Would be illegal in some countries in Europe.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 11:04 AM
2

i am not sure who has to pay for it.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 03:12 PM
2

yeah and it's like a insurance. I hope OP doesn't circumcis his kids because that is more than 30 $. You insure yourself that you don't find out after 1 year that the kid is not yours and all the time invested was for nothing and so on...
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:42 PM
5

There should probably be some sort of just legal waiver you sign admitting you are the father. This probably is already the case. But how should you know it wihtout a paternity test. I think a paternity test should be mandatory since a woman knows she is the bilogical mother a man should know the same. And there are stats that 6 % of children are rised by "fathers" who think they are their bilogical kids. So yes, i think it should be the 20 € worth. But i am looking from an european few on the i…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:39 PM
36

you can go to court and get a permit for an test.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:25 PM
3

I think you can still perform an test in germany but it is not "allowed in court as evidence" if not all parties consented. (so it is not punished to perform an test.)
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:20 PM
21

FGM Type 1 A is less worse than male circumcision. FGM Type 1 A is forbidden by law.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 09:27 AM
1

Is this real? I really don't think that this is real. It really sounds like she is trolling.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 07:04 PM
4

you don't have to lactate to shove your tit into a babys mouth.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 01:36 PM
4

Is this person famous or is this just someone on twitter who talks bullshit? You can find everything on twitter....
/r/MensRights03/04/17 02:59 PM
4

Well. They coverd it till 2011 (if this is colorado)
/r/MensRights30/03/17 02:45 AM
4

"Medicaid payments currently assist nearly 60 percent of all nursing home residents and about 37 percent of all childbirths in the United States."
/r/MensRights29/03/17 07:43 PM
4

they don't have to be feminists. There are many MRAs (often cicrumcised themself) who feel that way.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 07:37 PM
7

I know my personal anecdote does not necessarily mean the same for others, but correct me if I'm wrong, cutting off the foreskin usually does result in (A) lower sensitivity and (B) as a result of A, higher stamina due to less capacity for pleasure. But you can still do this as adult. And i assume there are even less complications if you do this as an adult. What if someone has troubles to come. A circumcision would make it worse. But if someone comes to fast than sure, he can try a circumcision…
/r/MensRights29/03/17 07:34 PM
12

Its really funny how STDs are often used as arguments. We don't argue against circumcision. We argue against the circumcision of children.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:23 PM
2

Boko Haram!
/r/MensRights11/03/17 12:19 AM
2

Obama tan suit?
/r/MensRights06/03/17 04:03 PM
9

Yes such a infographic needs sources on the bottom.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 03:05 PM
20

yeah, but the "outrage" is more about the hipocrasy of feminists.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 03:04 PM
1

as long as you don't have proble wiht your appendixes you don't do anything with it.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 08:06 PM
6

Lower transmission rate of STDs was one she listed. Your son can decide for himself to get a circumcision after he is 18. What are the odds that your son will have sex with someone who has an STD and doesn't use a condome before he turns 18? How much does a circumsizion cost? To be honest, i thing your son would rather have the money.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 08:02 PM
3

MRA shame does who cut heir babies. Not the babies.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 07:54 PM
2

m2
/r/MensRights03/02/17 02:27 PM
-1

kids arn't the problem as much. it is taking maternity or parental leave.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 02:24 PM
4

dragging you through an arrest, jailtime, all before a costly trial? Thats the problem not the anonymously accusation.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 07:28 PM
1

f. The foreskin is the developmental equivalent of the clitoris. What? I don't think so.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:29 PM
3

The women in the picture doesn't have to be a feminist.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:29 PM
1

Why are doctors doing that? Whats the reasoning behind it. Do they just want to take the money from the surgery?
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:28 PM
2

Well you can still take pain killers and so on as adult. The risk of complications probably would be lower since, well you arn't an infant but an adult.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:26 PM
3

Yes thats great for them. We have nothing against consenting men to make this decision for them.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:25 PM
1

do you have any stats?
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:24 PM
1

Like is this real?
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:22 PM
7

oh it feels great. I really don't know how else i could masturbate.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:20 PM
3

Yes but how much of those SIDS will he get before he is 18? After that he can deide it for himself. (And i assume at 18 the risk of dying of a circumsistance are not existin.g)
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:19 PM
2

Fun correlation to abortion: More men than women are in favour of it (in the US), It asked what is morally acceptable. Not if it should be banned or not. Men usually are about 5 % more in favor of an abortion ban than women. src: wiki abortoin usa public opinon.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:12 PM
3

its alright to be circumstanced and don't have a problem with it. Nevertheless people should consent to a circumscision themself.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:08 PM
3

Its probably the same with the women in sudan. Sounds plausible
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:07 PM
-4

I have the feeling that some of you just hate that because feminism is associated with Democrats. I really think that leaving waste after a demonstration is kind of a non-issue compared to many other demonstrations which went violent.
/r/PussyPass23/01/17 01:33 AM
1

idk. But if a doctor thinks that a circumcision is helpful to cure what ever there is to cure than you shouldn't ignore him...
/r/MensRights21/01/17 11:23 PM
-2

And it was kind of reasonable at that time since you didn't hader other option to avoid constant pain.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 12:28 PM
-1

They never would do something like this today since they would be suid into oblivion.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 12:27 PM
-1

Maybe they won't live that long if they die because of ignoring an doctor.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 12:26 PM
-1

a doctor would probably not recomend to extract all the teeth.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 02:13 AM
-17

nop. if it is recomendet by a doctor than i am alright with it.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 12:49 AM
1

Well but its not against the law i think (at least i so some dogs without tails)
/r/MensRights20/01/17 10:01 PM
3

ALL MAMMALS have a foreskin, and it's only legal to remove it from human male mammals. Intresting. It would be intresting to see what happends if somebody removes the foreskin from animales without reason. Do you think this would be animal creulity? It yes. it certanly would be intresting how the judge woulld rule.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 09:46 PM
7

If you assume that it is harder for a father than a mother to get custody of the child than the statement above has to be true if mothers and fathers a equal as good to care about children.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 05:51 PM
1090

dont't want to be a downer but i think we are the kind of people who should point out flaws in such kind of researches. The Question asked if they expirenced abuse in a relathionship in their lifetime. So it got also counted if they expirenced abuse in a heterosexuell relationsship before coming out.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 01:42 PM
49

Don't see why Ludacris would need that 2000$ from her though Well it is the childs money. The child has a right to the money.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 05:35 PM
2

no.
/r/MensRights26/12/16 08:14 PM
2

It has more to do with testosteron and not beeing physcially stronger.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 11:45 PM
2

There was a wave of "i need feminism because" pictures on the internet / twitter a while ago. Most of them were dishonest and misguiding or subjective. Thats why she is writting in the begining: "I don't need feminism because" (just google "i need feminism because". But be aware that there are also fake / satire ones.) Also i want to mention that i am sure that nearly all in this sub don't have anything against the effects of first (e. g. vote rights for women) and second wave feminism but third…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 05:31 PM
7

don't connect those two issues.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 01:37 AM
6

Why is every nazi a republican? Just because they are part of it doesn't mean that the majority is it.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 09:37 PM
11

"anti capitalist" is about economics and has nothing to to with anything else.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 09:33 PM
8

than bring the class war back!
/r/MensRights01/12/16 09:29 PM
5

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=manterrupting
/r/MensRights30/11/16 03:02 PM
2

But you can molest a child without beeing a pedophile. (You also can have sex with men without beeing Gay.)
/r/MensRights13/11/16 02:38 AM
1

would it really matter? I think most people would totally understand it. Hell i even think that a GF wouldn't even have a problem with it.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 02:49 AM
2

I am Straight and ofc i would suck a dick for 1 million. Hell even for 100,000 $ Maybe i am cheap but if i would take alcohol and a little bit of xanax or other benzos and nobody would ever find out than i would even go down to 1000 $.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 02:48 AM
3

No you idiot, it's nothing to do with the 'medical equipment' or 'supervision' you're chopping off part of a baby without their permission and claiming it's a medical procedure so you don't feel fucking guilty about it. You have to attack the effectivness of the medical procedure to change a persons mind. not the person!
/r/MensRights07/11/16 12:49 AM
5

Let's assume that the risk of heterosexually-acquired HIV infection in men is reduced by 60 %. I assume this is per sex act. There are 1,218,400 people living with a hiv infection in the USA. This are 0.3 % of the US Population. 57% of those are Men who have sex with men. Therefore there are 0,129 % left for heterosexuall men. 310,000 of those infected with HIV are women. This means that 0,.9 % of the female US population has HIV. So if you are the unlucky one who has sex with one of thos 0,19 %…
/r/MensRights07/11/16 12:43 AM
1

Is it even allowed that single mothers get children? I mean i think its alright if a child doesn't have a father and a mother but they should have 2 parents. I am pretty sure that else the kid would have a hughe disadvantage.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 12:00 AM
44

Does this matter? Legally, seperated but equal isn't allowed in the US.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 05:39 PM
8

detention Well depends on where you live. detention is illegal in my country.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 05:04 PM
0

well, i thought he meant biological.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 01:56 AM
0

well, i thought he meant biological.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 01:56 AM
-11

It is fraud. I am probably on the same side as all the people wo downvoted me. I just wanted to say that there a circumstances where it is valide sometimes to force people to pay for a child which isn't theirs. Like in the case of adoption.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 01:24 AM
7

yes
/r/MensRights26/10/16 01:21 AM
-51

It depends on it. Did he belive that he is the biological father while signing a document? (didn't read article ofc.) If you adopt a child you can't undo it and i think it's good this way.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 10:40 PM
3

Am Austrian. This is alright. he will get his punishment. somebody at the court fucked something up and never stated in the report that the "rape" wasn't consensual.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 04:22 PM
2

isn't there something with the spirit of the law which would also protect men?
/r/MensRights03/10/16 05:56 PM
1

I agree.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 06:21 PM
2

This will probably change within the next 8 years.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:17 PM
2

Well, I don't hope that she screws it up. I hope that she'll just an average Obama-like president. Also 3 decades ago feminism was viable. But I agree that feminism becomes more unpopular as soon as issues dissapear. And for many people, not only feminists, was it a "problem" that we never had an female president. With a female president femnism loses again viability.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:04 PM
10

She isn't for mens rights. But men's rights aren't the only thing people in this sub consider if they pick a POTUS. We are not single issue voters. Judge me, but i like the idea that a women is president. I don't think that she'll be better because of her gender but finaly feminist can't say anymore that there wasn't a women president.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 04:21 PM
-8

it just points out the hipocrasy of feminism. Gender shouldn't be considerd at any point for the job as POTUS. I shame people who do this. wether they vote for trump because he is a men or they vote for hillary because she is a women.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 04:18 PM
74

It's not good to vote for men simply because they are men. It's also not good to vote for a women simply because shes a women.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 04:06 PM
1

source?
/r/MensRights31/08/16 10:06 AM
1

thats reasonable.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 09:58 AM
5

I can just speak for myself. I am rather raped than accused of raped.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 02:04 PM
4

is this legal binding or can i get this case to a higher instance?
/r/MensRights27/07/16 03:36 AM
1

I think different. It's alright for a insurence to 'discriminate' based on gender etc. Since the EU passed the law that no insurance has the right to consider gender etc. into the fees every man is stuipid to buy a special health-insurance and every woman is stupid if she buys a life-insurance.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 07:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter