TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

blinderzoff Archive

View 2 posts and 546 comments by blinderzoff on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Free spankings for brats too clever by half!
/r/MensRights13/08/15 02:25 PM
1

Have you cleaned the child porn off your computer? Have you stopped beating your wife? Do you find these questions insulting? Now you get it!
/r/MensRights04/09/14 08:01 PM
2

cf. Bimbo
/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:22 AM
1

I wouldn't say they are backstabbers, I never trusted them to begin with. I will say I wouldn't want to be closest to the street if I were walking beside them and a bus was coming...
/r/MensRights02/09/14 10:11 PM
1

It's like they took a page from the Jay Wilson playbook: "Just say 'Fuck Those Losers'. And make sure everyone knows you mean your paying audience. Oh BTW can I get that consulting fee in cash now?"
/r/MensRights02/09/14 10:04 PM
2

What she did is make male privilege appear to vanish into nothingness...by juxtaposing it with female privilege. She is a comedian. The point was to show how casually arrogant and offensive women can be and feel justified doing so. More of this please!
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:59 PM
2

I shit on their pledge and the lies and misrepresentation it represents. I do pledge to tell deluded zealots to fuck right off. Every time. I will not be browbeaten into submission.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 05:03 PM
9

You can't tell who the owner is in a dick pic. Not to mention gals don't seem to want such pics, even when they do know the owner. So without a demand, supply is scant. Who could have predicted this?
/r/MensRights02/09/14 04:57 PM
1

I agree that this really isn't about ZQ: Anyone who is willing and has access will use lies, bribes, sex, deceit, or blackmail to manipulate the press in their favor. It is the press that is supposed to resist that or else become the story themselves.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 04:06 PM
4

Pls don't mug or murder me either. k thx bye.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 03:05 PM
1

And poking holes in a condom, if that's the case, is deplorable. He ought to go to jail for that. Sabotaging birth control is a crime against humanity if you think about it.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 02:56 PM
2

what does she expect? No one talks about this stuff and everyone on the internet villainizes men all the time and no one bats an eye For you and all of us as well to STFU and "take it like a man."
/r/MensRights26/08/14 02:51 PM
1

I saw one titled "Y'all care about black men's issues or nah?" If so, the hook is "I came across as an ass right from the get-go and didn't get a great response"
/r/MensRights18/08/14 06:56 PM
1

cf. agitprop
/r/MensRights18/08/14 06:24 PM
2

Run, and if she isn't already in heels drop caltrops. Practicality trumps principle: There is no way in hell I'm getting into that no-win scenario.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 05:37 PM
2

cf. Rebuilding the mound Once you understand the nature of the fire ant colony you can provoke them in relative safety. The fierce response to any disturbance of the mound is entirely predictable. The ants simply have no choice in the matter. Poke the mound and they come storming out, furiously stinging and attempting to restore the mound to its previous shape. You can witness the same thing whenever discussing issues which offend the feminine imperative. Much of what we do in the manosphere is …
/r/MensRights18/08/14 05:30 PM
1

you're conflating two different things; a society with patriarchal values and the issue of equality under the law. And worse, implying we can infer anything at all about society IRL from a particular forum on the internet. The Internet is indeed a part of our daily lives, and yet at the same time it isn't real.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 08:39 PM
0

Pls start moar businesses. Meanwhile I think I will take the easy way out and just hire /u/LaceyLovexo. See you at the top!
/r/MensRights15/08/14 06:44 PM
1

Wouldn't these be the same men so blinded by a whiff of pussy they'd marry one if she allowed it? The whole thing is a fucking trap, and it is positive selection for men who don't believe women's bullshit (or more precisely reject the "girls are sugar and spice" trope) and negative selection against men who will act against their own self-interest for them. Decades of this and suddenly you hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth: "Why don't men want to get married?" Some do. You have crushed them…
/r/MensRights15/08/14 06:19 PM
1

Before it was a covert scam to get men to sign up to support women in their old age. Now it is an overt scam to fleece men as a matter of course. Why dipshits continue to sign up for it, all the while claiming "she'd never do that to me" when all evidence points to the fact that any woman could and would do it to any man while society cheers her on I will never understand. Then they show up here months or years later slack-jawed and dumbfounded asking "what do I do?". We have no more helpful ide…
/r/MensRights15/08/14 05:22 PM
3

very pretty girl Her success manipulating stupid men has led her to believe all men are stupid and easily manipulated. Because they'd have to be unless she thinks an army of women against all men is going to work out well for the women. Her mass slaughter would require the participation of men killing other men for the crime of being...men. So they'd have to both do it just on her say so and also believe they aren't putting themselves into the same line just a bit further back.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 04:26 PM
2

Those would be the dumb internet threads about which it is silly to draw extensive conclusions from. HTH
/r/MensRights15/08/14 04:01 PM
35

The morale will continue until the beatings improve.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 03:54 PM
3

It doesn't matter what color your skin is when the SWAT team has the wrong address. Your dog will be shot for sure, grandma probably, and you maybe.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:42 PM
26

If that were the case, a different company with no such compunctions will hire women and this company would fail. Then the guys get zero commission anyway. Their objection is silly.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:26 PM
11

Women do not sexualize 80% of men like men sexualize 80% of women. FTFY They sexualize 20% of men and call the rest "below average". And in regards to the OP I'm not seeing how this provides a moral high ground from which to cast aspersions at male sexuality. Perhaps if I was a bigot and a hater it would become clear.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 07:33 PM
1

Criticize a woman's appearance = OMG you misogynist pig!
/r/MensRights26/06/14 08:07 PM
1

Not All Feminists Are Like That. Strictly true of course. cf. NAWALT (Not All Women Are Like That), #NotAllMen, No True Scotsman
/r/MensRights23/06/14 04:25 AM
1

Sorry I was trying to imply "If one were as uncharitable then one could say..." Hence the question marks. I'm not saying I believe this.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 05:48 PM
1

men are socialized to talk about themselves all the time So what are women socialized to do instead? Gossip? This is an improvement?
/r/MensRights22/06/14 04:31 PM
2

From the book of Shaggy: "It wasn't me"
/r/MensRights22/06/14 04:05 PM
7

Cypher be like: "Can't a coppertop get some steak up in here?"
/r/MensRights22/06/14 02:36 PM
3

"This is not difficult. Just arbitrary."
/r/MensRights22/06/14 02:33 PM
9

It has been my understanding that 2X veers between wacky and pretty cool.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 01:23 PM
1

Next up: Legislators have to prove they understand the ramifications of their bills, or face charges of treason.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:06 PM
2

No, pulling this "I'm a victim so I should be spared even the slightest criticism at all or else you are all a bunch of big meanies" act is disingenuous. Unless you aren't really here to talk but rather to scold, or more likely, troll.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 01:14 PM
5

Ah, the old "I'll do the fucked up shit you do so that you will see how fucked up it is" gambit. This approach doesn't tend to work out well even with reasonable target selection. Since most guys don't catcall and don't understand why loudmouths do it, doing it to guys at random is going to fall flat.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 03:38 AM
3

I'm sorry you got some shitty PMs. The one I saw him link was ridiculously tame: Go take another women's study class. This is a shitty PM?! Snotty would have been the correct characterization. This is the internet FFS. I imagine he would become apoplectic if he got the typical PM from Manhood Academy.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 01:30 AM
2

Exactly! What kind of creepy, low-status man doesn't have everyone hanging on his every word?
/r/MensRights11/06/14 12:54 AM
2

Although, if you go to China or most non-western places, you can tell me how far being white gets you. That reminds me of the Louis CK quote: Here’s how great it is to be white, I could get in a time machine and go to any time and it would be fuckin’ awesome when I get there. That is exclusively a white privilege. Everybody but the white guys are nodding furiously. The white guys are negotiating the over/under on average time for dude to be squished like a bug. To imagine how that might play out…
/r/MensRights06/06/14 09:18 PM
8

patriarchy theory sees men as having something of an unbreakable hold (or hard to break anyway), on "power" in society Therefore it obviously does blames men. This is also the part that makes it a conspiracy theory: A conspiracy theory is an explanatory proposition that accuses two or more persons, a group, or an organization of having caused or covered up, through secret planning and deliberate action, an illegal or harmful event or situation Some scholars suggest that people formulate conspira…
/r/MensRights06/06/14 08:25 PM
3

Would seem to be pretty basic stuff. A clear corollary to The Golden Rule. You'd think it would be intuitively obvious to a subgroup purported to be innately overflowing with empathy for others.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 05:28 PM
1

cf. proportionate response
/r/MensRights05/06/14 05:24 PM
6

Lolita
/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:04 AM
6

Wish you would at least be wary. Maintain that situational awareness. Not to oppress you or anything though bro.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:54 PM
1

Which is why they are banned. Censorship has nothing to do with it. They are children throwing tantrums and then screaming abuse at the kids that don't want to play with them anymore. Because that's gonna turn 'em around.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 10:25 PM
2

The problems which face women are, as highlighted by the huge number of people tweeting #YesAllWomen, greater both in number and severity than those which affect men. Bullshit. If instead you used /r/mr as your baseline then clearly the problems men face are greater both in number and severity than those which affect women. A bunch of whingers doesn't prove jack shit, ourselves included. FFS.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 07:20 PM
4

Or maybe this is all just bullshit trolling to inflame passions. I mean do what you want, but don't call the rain and then act surprised when you hear thunder.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 07:11 PM
4

I was going to say that "what you did there" was clearly against their rules, but looking at their FAQ you have to do a fair bit of reading to suss this out: So, the other sane/nonhypocritical approach to this issue, is to declare r/feminism to be for women's issues only, but ALSO to support and encourage feminist participation within other spaces which focus on men's issues. In other words, although feminists support gender equality for all genders, we reserve our space for women's issues, but …
/r/MensRights04/06/14 05:57 PM
2

Why is it necessarily a problem for WRAs to primarily advocate for women and MRAs to primarily advocate for men? It doesn't have to be a zero-sum game.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 05:10 PM
3

Agreed!
/r/MensRights04/06/14 04:57 PM
3

That's clearly the zeitgeist of the sub and it has been explicitly pointed out before. That's why I asked why you'd be surprised: I meant by the reaction to your casual assumption that Patriarchy is a real thing in a comment to this sub. But hey, at least here you can argue against that POV without being deleted and banned, though your karma may take a hit.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:55 PM
2

Having argued this over the /r/subredditanalysis data, claiming that the two subs are "not even remotely related" is also a bit misleading. I do understand however that trying to counter the gross misrepresentation in the other direction doesn't lend itself to nuance.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:35 PM
5

patriarchy and feminism is the intellectual movement meant to counter patriarchy. You would be downvoted because "Patriarchy" is complete and utter bullshit. It is a conspiracy theory and foments hatred for men. Why is this so surprising?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:09 PM
-1

I have a feeling this has already been proposed by somebody Almost daily I'm interested in learning more about the topic, so I've decided to post this question here. The FAQ is a fantastic resource for just this purpose. Why not use it first? Don't get me wrong: Appreciate the interest, simply twitchy about the lack of forum etiquette (i.e. Lurk and read the FAQ before you post to any forum as a newbie).
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:02 PM
12

It's actually not surprising at all for a privately owned company to buckle in the face of a boycott. It's not their fight, FFS. When government is successfully lobbied to throw men under the bus, that's when it's outrageous.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 10:04 PM
0

I have yet to see any of these pompous scolds even solve for x, which is really what must be done to prove a statistically significant overlap in the first place. Assuming good data derived from a sound methodology Assuming that the formula given is valid for this application. And that the results mean what is claimed. I have solved for x, there is a statistically significant overlap, but it of course falls short of the "literally subreddit-lite" threshold. By their own data and methodology pres…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 09:29 PM
2

Zero. All users failing the ideological purity test even once are banned and their comments deleted from /r/fomentschisms So you could have users from there posting here, but the bot would find zero users from here to there, and plugging that into the formula we would find no (statistically) significant overlap.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 09:15 PM
3

Did you do the math to get x? Also, I think "significant overlap" is supposed to mean statistically significant overlap. I don't think anyone here is claiming there is no overlap in users posting to both groups, or the argument wouldn't even make it this far. We have moved on to debunking the idea that this intersection of users indicates a significant ideological overlap which is the canard that is being pushed here.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 08:56 PM
0

Yes, similar to religious fundamentalists. And almost exactly like Pod People.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 07:22 PM
8

And presumably you have no actual helpful ideas or insights for them either.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 07:07 PM
17

The "overlap" is 6.9% and we don't even know how many of those are TRPs commenting just to call us losers and betas. So it seems you are here just to peddle some bullshit. How about we ask bigoted nitwits such as yourself not to post here? It would be about as effective.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:18 PM
11

No, the more reasonable interpretation then is there is very little overlap with other subs. Or you can continue to willfully misrepresent the situation, aka SOP for bigoted nitwits.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 05:40 PM
13

In the provided link (that blows their stupid premise completely out of the water), note the "of 2531 Users Found" How representative that 2.75% of total subscribers to /r/mensrights is oddly left unaddressed. Edit: To be clear, not even all of those 187 users are even subscribed to /r/mr given the methodology.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 05:40 PM
2

In their minds: Women > Themselves > all other men. Simultaneously disgustingly obsequious and foolishly arrogant.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 04:08 PM
1

Add insults and that is the depth and breadth of their arsenal.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 03:03 PM
2

Applying Occam's Razor: Zealotry, bigotry, and hypocrisy. Also, Grey's Law: Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 03:00 PM
4

It's like "due process" is an actual thing. Whereas "rape culture"...
/r/MensRights03/06/14 01:43 AM
2

Nobody has ever, ever confronted me IRL with that accusation. The misguided individuals who would express such offensively ignorant and bigoted language are huge cowards, much like the punks getting up to all kinds of mischief with my mom on xbox live. So my guess is we are as likely to get the loons to stop with the rape apologist nonsense as we are to stop juvenile delinquents from defiling my mother in the most improbable ways.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 08:08 PM
7

The people up in arms about a #KillAllWomen hashtag are not necessarily the same people who gleefully use the #KillAllMen hashtag. Where there is an intersection between the two groups that area of the Venn diagram is labeled "hypocrites".
/r/MensRights30/05/14 04:25 PM
6

Perhaps they consider anything less than deletion and banning as support. It is consistent with how feminist forums are moderated.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 03:36 PM
1

They are ironically validating his logic. Grey's Law: Any sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from malice.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:47 AM
8

It's a cookbook!
/r/MensRights29/05/14 10:35 PM
8

More like: The Toxic Appeal Of Yellow Journalism You know, an actual thing with facts and stuff on record regarding its sordid history. My favorite comment: He was linked to pick-up artists and anti-pick up artists. These are not men's rights. It's like getting strippers and feminists confused.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 10:05 PM
6

"Some men don't give a fuck what we say. But don't worry: We are working hard on the rest!"
/r/MensRights29/05/14 09:52 PM
36

dat privilege tho
/r/MensRights29/05/14 09:45 PM
3

TIL: I lock my doors because I believe each and every human being on the planet is trying to rob my shit. No exceptions. I mean either I don't believe that so I would be a hypocrite to lock my door, or I do believe that and of course I lock my door. There is no intermediate position, no middle ground between the two extremes. FFS.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 09:39 PM
1

/u/beanfiddler would be one of the bullies I referred to previously
/r/MensRights23/05/14 04:08 PM
0

Make sure you know before you go, The dance floor bro/ho ratio. Five to one is a brodeo...
/r/MensRights22/05/14 06:20 PM
4

I suppose there isn't enough water on the plane for the women to drown the children in, so perhaps it is safer for them.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 04:11 PM
4

Well that's a refreshing change from their normal playbook of insults and contempt.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 02:48 AM
3

There are no self-defence classes taught to men in how to deal with female attacks that don't end with the man in the hospital after being beaten by white knights or the police and then brought up on charges under VAWA Surely this is what was meant.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 01:31 PM
2

As implied by the OP's comment, they clearly aren't anywhere near as frightened of men in general as petite men are of larger men. Or else you'd have to believe women are too stupid to understand something almost every single man does, and I'm not buying it.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 01:22 PM
3

Here's the deal: "Men shouldn't hit women" can often be seen as a corollary to "the strong shouldn't bully the weak", and I have no problem with that. Where that isn't what is going on, I am simply not going to believe the rule applies, and those badgering men into saying so are bullies.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 01:13 PM
1

My reaction was similar, though since I believe women have agency I don't see Monica as a victim of Clinton-as-sexual-predator. They are definitely both fools if they thought this wasn't all eventually going to come out and become a shitstorm, but she certainly did not deserve having her life destroyed. What was done to her is an abomination. Then and now the unforgivably excessive airtime and political energy spent on talking about a god damn blow job blows my mind.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 05:31 PM
6

Well actually it would be kinda funny if the wife emerged and they gave her the job instead.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 04:15 PM
11

"Bigamy is having one wife too many. Monogamy is the same" --Oscar Wilde
/r/MensRights02/05/14 04:11 PM
3

It is also an old one, ascribed to many: The role of the character initiating the proposal in this anecdote has been assigned to George Bernard Shaw, Winston Churchill, Groucho Marx, Mark Twain, W.C. Fields, Bertrand Russell, H.G. Wells, Woodrow Wilson and others.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 06:28 PM
4

It is just an ironic insult. Ironic because it is used by those that want to lord it over MRAs yet do a shit job of it.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 03:45 PM
5

You may be thinking of the infamous Hugo Schwyzer.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 03:42 PM
8

Instead of an "outrage" tag, can we have one for just "annoying, like midges in late summer"?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 09:31 PM
11

Now if one of these incredibly able women would want to make a similar show with just women going out in the wild and surviving only out of what nature has to offer I'm behind it 100%. Yes. After all: "Show, Dont Tell"
/r/MensRights22/04/14 09:27 PM
1

"Why turn in all the cash I found when I busted that drug dealer?" - Don't be that cop. This is what I had in mind. Baldly stating they are all corrupt until taught otherwise would make their heads explode in rage. However this is and should remain a thought experiment to make people reconsider their mindless support for bigoted-slogans-as-awareness campaigns like "Don't be that guy". Actually doing it would be a case of "I will do the fucked up things you are doing so that you will see how fuck…
/r/MensRights22/04/14 05:35 PM
5

Yeah you'd hate to lump all the good ones in with the assholes, as if they are all equally likely to be corrupt or something. That'd be pretty offensive and might get them riled up.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 10:32 PM
31

Time for a "Don't be that cop" campaign.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 08:59 PM
2

You missed the major sticking point: Sewage treatment. Checkmate, feminists. "I love the smell of effluent in the morning. Smells like victory"
/r/MensRights21/04/14 01:58 PM
3

Ruby on Fails? Or is it Ruby on Derails. Anyway if they tried to peddle this crap to me I'd have a Duty to Bail.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 04:00 PM
-1

"research" [Serious] You realize this gets asked almost daily?
/r/MensRights20/04/14 03:39 PM
10

Her attempts to conflate COTWA with racism smells a lot like Red Scare.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 03:27 PM
1

Choose the form of The Destructor!
/r/MensRights18/04/14 02:24 PM
1

I can't believe we never suspected people might be telling this lie on purpose for political gain. Oh, wait...
/r/MensRights18/04/14 02:17 PM
1

You don't want to be on the losing side of the war. As I implied in response to the "Kill All Men' cross stitch, it's time to shit or get off the pot. Don't talk about it, do it. Less talk and more action. Please do not hesitate to show the world who the violent thugs really are. It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 05:14 PM
1

Thoughtcrime. Thoughtcrime everywhere. #ImagineAFeministInternet
/r/MensRights11/04/14 02:17 PM
2

Yet another forest of dead trees. I have seen the future of their Glorious Revolution, and it is [deleted].
/r/MensRights04/04/14 11:54 PM
1

There was a cross stitch for "Shit or get off the pot" but it's no longer available.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 09:56 PM
1

I swear they understand nothing. When we said they are bat shit crazy, this isn't what we meant.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 04:04 PM
6

6' or over, regardless of their own height (or height to weight ratio) apparently. I'm 6'2" and this near universal preference in women for tall men is clear to me, to you, and everyone else besides. But some will pretend it isn't so because it is so obviously hypocritical when juxtaposed to the continuous bandsaw whine of "you shouldn't never judge women on their weight!" cf. deliberately obtuse
/r/MensRights27/03/14 09:35 PM
1

I didn't see anything like "As a feminist..." in these either. I think for many here anything that reeks of Patriarchy Theory (Men are the source of all suffering and evil in the world) is assumed to be coming from a feminist or was inspired and promoted by feminism. This might be a failure of imagination in that there are some truly sick individuals out there and approximately half of them are women.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 01:19 PM
2

Just how insane must one be then to be convinced of the idea that damsels and sexy characters in games somehow instill sexism and thereby promote violence against women? And yet "murder simulators" don't instill jack shit?! Or as Francis puts it: "Look at me. LOOK AT ME! I OWN WII FIT!"
/r/MensRights20/03/14 09:57 PM
3

TIL: Turnabout isn't fair play
/r/MensRights01/03/14 12:30 PM
1

It is important to remember that none of these are anywhere near as offensive as one reading "Looking to score" /s
/r/MensRights01/03/14 12:23 PM
16

So...one minute we are neckbeard shitlords that can be insulted and dismissed with prejudice, and the next we are leading the dialogue? Somebody accidentally a step or two.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 11:14 PM
3

Do what better? Complain? Lie? Insult? Anonymously call someone a coward while cowering behind their computer screen like a douche?
/r/MensRights26/02/14 01:37 PM
5

TIL: whining, complaining, nagging, blaming others, shaming all men, exaggerating their "oppression" and demanding somebody else solve their problems is "dealing with it"
/r/MensRights26/02/14 01:28 PM
13

Playgirl is available at those same locations...
/r/MensRights26/02/14 01:18 PM
3

Because he might object to drowning them in a bathtub?
/r/MensRights26/02/14 12:41 PM
2

Something is nagging me....something about a prior controversy regarding inappropriate messages on shirts... "It's just a T-Shirt. Get a sense of humor, sheesh" ...is what we were told as I recall.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 12:35 PM
2

And the the rate for men between 15 and 44 dying or injured by violence is...? We know the overall rate of violent crime for men is three to four times higher than women. So is her point that men deserve it but women don't?! EDIT: The BJS victimization report does not seem to bear out the proportion I mention above, though it is the case that the majority of the victims of violent crime are male.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 11:56 AM
3

It is so simple to avoid. Just ask yourself: "Would there be a shitstorm of epic proportions if I did this to a girl?" If the answer is "yes", then there is a slight chance doing it to a boy might get you in trouble.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 11:47 AM
9

Why do normal women stay silent on this? I don't think they see an upside in speaking out. Whereas they sure as hell know the downside of speaking against Team Woman.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 11:43 AM
2

the widespread male dominance of the video game industry that leads to women being sexualized and idealized more consistently than men This is the kind of aggressively and insultingly obtuse characterization of the situation that pisses us off. Women consistently choose hot avatars in sexy clothing when given the choice. And before I get NAWALTed, OF COURSE not all, and even those that usually do don't do it all the time, but they seem to really want to have that option. So it isn't all about wh…
/r/MensRights27/01/14 02:30 PM
9

There is an ugly history of this sub being trolled by submissions that are subsequently edited after upvotes and supportive comments are made to make us look like we are into some crazy shit. Did you notice the comment from /u/rightsbot? See the explanation on why the bot had to be implemented for the reasons behind the paranoia.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 05:34 PM
74

"In your day we were allowed to have men-only spaces so that gals couldn't come along thinking they can just boot us from the best spots and bring their contentiousness into an area designed for relaxation"
/r/MensRights09/01/14 02:24 PM
1

As much as I hate to allow NAFALT to be used as an out to avoid discussions of bad behavior, nuance exists and the opposite position (AFALT) is neither true nor helpful. I think what we can agree on is that there appears to be a disturbing number of the disturbed among the feminists that we become aware of. My guess is that if there were as many virulent misogynists among MRAs, let alone if it was 100% as some love to claim, shit would have gotten very real quite a while ago.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 06:42 AM
1

I'm having a hard time believing this is real. The vast majority of the population will think you are not just petty but actually disturbed if you put this much effort into talking about hating on small penises, and then to go out of your way to make sure everyone knows you are this pathetic. It seems way more likely they think they are parodying something that men do. Unfortunately for her no men have ever, ever put anywhere near this effort into hating on cavernous vaginas.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 05:57 PM
9

The word you are looking for is "Egalitarian".
/r/MensRights22/12/13 03:35 PM
1

cf. "Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists"
/r/MensRights21/12/13 03:02 PM
5

It's nice when people do the work of creating a public hiring blacklist for me Fantastic idea! Saved image under folder "Hiring Blacklist".
/r/MensRights21/12/13 01:24 PM
1

They don't mean you literally hate women. When this is said what they mean is "Thoughtcrime!"
/r/MensRights21/12/13 01:14 PM
1

female abuse victims will freak out if they have to be around men. Wait is this an abuse shelter or a psych eval?
/r/MensRights21/12/13 12:58 PM
12

A dictionary. It might be too subtle.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 12:49 PM
3

Sic Semper Tyrannis
/r/MensRights21/12/13 12:34 PM
5

"I wish we had a Stasi that would drag men away in the night based on an accusation of thoughtcrime instead of what few freedoms we have left in the USA. Life in eastern Germany before the wall fell must have been paradise.sigh" What a daft, twisted harpy.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 12:31 PM
2

It's SRS logic. It isn't meant to be taken seriously. The actual translation is "The offended have the privilege to shut down discourse". Which is, of course, childishly naive.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 06:10 PM
4

If we are both of the opinion that whether you call it mutilation or body modification, none of these things (circumcision, tattooing, or piercings) should be legal to do to anyone other than consenting adults then I'm just misunderstanding where you were trying to go with this: otherwise you'd be pushing to outlaw tattoos and piercings as well.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 07:16 PM
2

If you seriously expect bullies and bigots to play fair just because you ask nicely, you're gonna have a bad time.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 06:37 PM
6

I demand the death penalty for anyone both vile enough to think this is an acceptable standard of jurisprudence and stupid enough to advocate it.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 06:30 PM
6

STRAWMAN ALERT WHOOP WHOOP WHOOP! It probably is illegal to tatoo an infant FFS.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 06:23 PM
1

If somebody decided there is a space men can not go into even for maintenance, then either they have already arranged for female maintenance workers or they deserve to have their fool's paradise fall to ruin. Stupid is supposed to hurt. That's how you know not to do it.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 02:44 PM
3

The mind boggles. The invective of deluded bigots isn't meant for logical analysis.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 02:14 PM
1

None of us are in North Korean labor camps. Privilege level: Off the charts.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 02:17 PM
6

putting other human beings on the moral level of Hugo Schwyzer. I have to admit that's classic.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 01:45 PM
2

I bet you thought the villagers were pissed at the boy that cried wolf because they didn't believe in wolves.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 01:42 PM
-1

It's how they let you know right up front they are loons. Quite considerate of them if you think about it.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 01:54 AM
2

Many of us struggle with this: "Why be fair to a group that has for decades sneered at the idea of acting in good faith?" versus "Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster"
/r/MensRights31/10/13 01:27 PM
5

Yeah that definitely reads as: MRAs have once again stolen one of our most beloved tactics: Our decades-long campaign of poisoning the well by misusing data in an attempt to exaggerate the villainy of men.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 09:56 PM
1

In the wisdom of the before-time it was considered basest knavery to dish it out but not take it.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 12:23 AM
1

This scam has already been working for thousands of years so don't expect it to stop any time soon. Just don't be the mark.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 12:12 AM
1

Exactly. 1826 called. They want their arguments back.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 01:21 PM
8

Sarcastic comments/jokes really don't add and don't help the cause These expressions of men's frustration and anger are the red light on the dashboard telling you the engine is about to blow up.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 02:24 PM
6

I think "unsubstantiated allegations" is the term you are looking for. Tellingly whenever this has come up before no offending threads or comments with a score in positive double-digits have ever been linked, but hey if any can be located...we are allowed to brigade our own sub, right?
/r/MensRights12/10/13 02:03 PM
1

This whole post seems to be filled with people who don't follow reddiquette Well that would actually be all of reddit. That doesn't it make it right though, I'll grant. However, "When in Rome..." [People ITT] answer in sarcasm or half answers Maybe the shorthand is because: can you explain why you made that list and what this subreddits concerns actually are? Either you've read the FAQ and know that it already does a better job at this than I ever could and so you are just trolling, or you haven…
/r/MensRights23/09/13 10:17 PM
1

I'd make sure I had 3 quarters to hand out to them at times like this. "You've earned it"
/r/MensRights20/09/13 12:15 AM
2

I was irrationally pissed off He did admit this. Remember you not the passion of youth?
/r/MensRights20/09/13 12:14 AM
6

"Check please!"
/r/MensRights19/09/13 11:58 PM
3

Lara Croft attacks male characters, and all the baddies in the game are male. That could actually be interpreted as misandry... ;) Apparently the vast majority of those that would raise such a stink also realize how silly that would sound. Unless she runs around saying "Imma shoot me some menz" and then sure enough shoots dudes cheering "Yeah take that white CIS male!" That might be troubling. Or hilarious, done a particular way.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 11:49 PM
10

Biology is clearly misandry. Our legal system isn't biology. It isn't a biological organism, the courts aren't hives where mindless drones act according to instinct. Having a biology degree does not qualify you to be a judge, nor a lawyer, nor a police officer, nor a CPS case worker. In short, biology doesn't explain a damn thing about our legal system. Here are some things that do matter in cases of law: mens rea verbal contracts lack of consideration invalidating contracts fraud These are all …
/r/MensRights19/09/13 11:12 PM
1

Abortions are illegal here. Wow that makes it a whole different world, one where most of the subscribers to this sub would likely be considered feminists. As a thought experiment I've asked the question of why women seem to think that their reproductive rights are superior to the child's right to life, particularly when men's reproductive rights are so easily dismissed. The point of that is to make them realize that they should take the reproductive rights of men as seriously as those of women. …
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:53 PM
1

I was wondering if it would take you less than 10 minutes to respond. Well played.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:28 PM
13

Replying on this account to get around 10 minutes between posts rule because I have been down voted on the other account. Perhaps waiting the 10 minutes would have been the better option.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:16 PM
13

Although they couldn't state it directly; the implication was clear - the Metropolitan Police consider MGM to be a crime along side FGM. It's like you don't even need to know the answer to "Is it a boy or a girl?" to answer the question "Shall we cut its genitals?"
/r/MensRights18/09/13 11:41 PM
9

Wait, you are assuming what is on offer now is "marriage". It isn't and hasn't been for a long while now. So these are just guys who, having bought one lemon and seeing the scam in action, aren't stupid enough to do so again.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 10:37 PM
2

I'd get married if there was a woman that I considered trustworthy enough. Really? Because it isn't that I don't trust women (more or less than men in general), it is that I don't trust the divorce industry complex not to leave me gut punched and destitute. You can pick your wife, and you can do a great job at that perhaps. But you don't get to pick the arresting officer for the domestic violence "complaint", nor your wife's divorce lawyer, nor the judge over the divorce proceedings, nor the fam…
/r/MensRights13/09/13 01:20 PM
3

IOW humans can be shitty creatures, particularly when there are institutionalized incentives for bad actions.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 01:26 PM
4

Blowing dudes in public: Not shameful at all. Looking at pictures of boobies in a lad's mag: ZOMG THIS IS TEH MISOGYNISTIC RAPE CULTURE!
/r/MensRights27/08/13 01:12 PM
2

Don't tell us where to go, teach thugs not to throw punches.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 01:04 PM
1

I would indeed be expected to pay in the second instance, so I'm saying your thesis that it is about how invites whom being what is driving this expectation for men to pay for dates is bullshit. Stop peeing my face and telling me it is raining.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 01:28 PM
4

Oddly this has never, ever been an issue with my male friends. Someone may suggest "Hey is anyone else hungry? I know I am. Let's go get some dinner at Random Restaurant Eks!". They aren't ever expected to pay for anyone that decides to come along. So if I'm with a gal and I say "Hey are you hungry? I know I am. Let's go get some dinner at Random Restaurant Eks!". How does the exact same suggestion suddenly imply I have invited her and am now on the hook to pay?
/r/MensRights22/08/13 01:18 PM
1

There does seem to be widespread confusion about the difference between bigotry and racism.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 10:39 PM
0

A few downvotes? ZOMG ITS TEH HIVE MIND!
/r/MensRights21/08/13 01:23 PM
6

"People" feel the need to do things like breathe and eat. Criminals and psychopaths feel the need to rape, rob, and murder. Edit: So we don't just get pissed off when "People" act like all men are ready to rape at their first chance, we also get pissed at the suggestion that the average man or woman would rape if the opportunity presented itself.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 01:18 PM
15

Getting banned immediately is going to set them straight for sure.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 01:11 PM
5

They never lie about never lying about rape either.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 01:41 PM
5

The woman who would make such comments is the type of person we don't want to be with either. So it's win-win.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 01:27 PM
2

"How can there be slaves in the field when there are a few in the house?"
/r/MensRights28/07/13 03:35 PM
1

"It isn't the hot dog's fault that the hallway is so roomy"
/r/MensRights28/07/13 03:31 PM
1

Feminist Jurisprudence: There is no burden of proof for the prosecution when a man is the accused. It is guilty until proven innocent beyond a reasonable doubt. Burden of proof is on the prosecution to prove a man isn't somehow to blame when a woman is the accused.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 02:58 PM
2

How about "no" you freaky eunuch bastard!
/r/MensRights28/07/13 02:52 PM
1

Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. So I suppose a delusional harridan could be right once a decade.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 02:48 PM
3

Yes. With contempt, scorn, and derision.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 02:39 PM
1

You actually don't know if I'm stupid... ...but now we know for sure you are malicious, vicious, and violent.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 02:37 PM
2

Oh noes my self esteems!
/r/MensRights14/07/13 04:51 PM
1

The whole range? Lemme guess, that range begins and ends with Guilt, Shame, and Remorse. Amirite?
/r/MensRights14/07/13 04:34 PM
2

Men's rights makes us better feminists.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 04:20 PM
2

"Women are bad at leading and being in a position of authority because of their hormones... I mean c'mon, you're like crazy 7 days of every month..." cf. Men are violent brutes because of testosterone poisoning. "women are just bad bosses, they're so shrill." cf. Women make better bosses than men because they are fairer and have more scruples "Well, uh... it's obvious women are bad bosses I don't need to have had one" a.k.a. Don't confuse me with the facts It is indeed all sexist bullshit and wi…
/r/MensRights14/07/13 04:17 PM
0

Can you explain how anyone other than feral humans would need to be taught specifically that rape is wrong? I wouldn't trust anyone that would need to be taught that not to mug or murder me either.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 05:01 PM
1

Oh noes they called us "dopes". And then harrumph and tut-tut in the comments. Again they prove their arsenal consists of insults and shaming. Well, and made up statistics, but those are designed to malign all men and to shame us into silence so really it is all of a piece.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 04:58 PM
2

Friendly fire isn't
/r/MensRights13/07/13 03:33 PM
1

I feel all this attention being paid to rape is taking away from concern about other forms of assault and murder. And men are the victims of violent crime at four times the rate women are. So I'm sorry ladies you need to STFU for now, because your concerns are just not as important. The numbers don't lie. Damn those two-edged swords!
/r/MensRights13/07/13 03:25 PM
5

"Officers I got some kids trespassin' on ma property and I smell the marijuana!"
/r/MensRights13/07/13 02:14 PM
3

Wait, we are constantly told the police won't take rape seriously but yet they'll do this based solely on an accusation of "creeper"? Somebody's lying, and I'm guessing it isn't OP.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 01:57 PM
3

This insanity is making me reconsider what was really at the root of all the witch burning throughout history... Imagine it is 1692 and a crackpot is running around telling all the gals about how they should round the guys up and take them to the town square for "castration day". I'd imagine the response would be...heated.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 01:45 PM
1

"If he's had a drink, no matter how horny he seems or claims to be, DON'T HAVE SEX WITH HIM: That's rape"
/r/MensRights12/07/13 01:42 PM
2

I don't understand the rush to interpret these posters as somehow being "rape apologist" posters. If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 01:39 PM
25

Karen Smith, I'd like you to meet Brian Banks. Please tell him how this "just doesn't happen".
/r/MensRights11/07/13 01:19 PM
1

Exactly, only a trained medical professional should be trying to rehabilitate such a severe case of rectal cranium impaction. An amateur is only going to cause additional inflammation.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 11:42 PM
1

"The only thing we need the cops for is to get you into a 24-hour psych evaluation" Thinking on my feet, I realized we should go into the other apartment door next to ours Or even better, reverse course and see if she follows. That'd be a hoot: "he was following me by making me chase him!"
/r/MensRights05/07/13 03:12 PM
1

It isn't "can not" it is "will not": this...individual...you are responding to is a well-known obstinate troll.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 02:38 PM
2

Damn ladies u really creepy!
/r/MensRights05/07/13 02:21 PM
2

If you are yourself a guy then it is relevant to this sub as nobody seems to give a shit when men get raped. But if that were true you'd think somewhere you'd mention that and specifically ask how to proceed to be taken seriously as a male victim of rape. If you are (claiming to be) a gal that this happened to there is absolutely no reason to post this here unless it is a setup for trolling. In the miniscule chance this isn't a troll: Obviously this is all kinds of fucked up and ideally we'd get…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 03:38 PM
1

One good trick deserves another.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 01:46 AM
1

Big story next year: "Armed forces recruitment has mysteriously plunged to almost nothing"
/r/MensRights03/07/13 10:44 PM
1

If someone robs me or assaults me, they'll be arrested right away and thrown in jail They are showing their privilege: They have never been assaulted or robbed or they would know it doesn't work like that without substantial evidence or an officer witnessing the crime.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 10:16 PM
3

The most ironic thing about it is, how stupid would a girl have to be to start a rock throwing fight with boys? It's like the story of the gang fight where one side started throwing sticks of dynamite at the other. That side picked them up, lit them, and threw them back.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 10:05 PM
0

Yes not only is it bad form to point to a low or negative rated comment as an indicator of the zeitgeist of a sub, it is plain silly to browse that particular sub expecting anything other than high octane bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 10:02 PM
3

they said that if that critique were posted in /r/mensrights it would be instantly deleted ...so I posted it here. It was not deleted So either they were deliberately lying or they don't know fuck all. You have to admit they are amazingly consistent at fail.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 09:45 PM
2

When men do the same shit with sex and then dump the girl, you never hear them scream You'd think with the ladies being more experienced with uncomfortable footwear they'd be able to handle it better when the shoe is on the other foot.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 04:09 AM
1

Jeez guys it isn't like she did anything really serious, like say protested Bank Of America with chalk. He just lost a penis. The chalk they had to wash off with water. With water.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 04:02 AM
7

These people that told you women don't judge men on their looks, did they also try to sell you a bridge and some swamplandFlorida real estate? Edited for clarity.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 03:40 AM
13

Damn ladies u creepy!
/r/MensRights30/06/13 11:38 PM
9

You should post this in the blog's comments so they can delete it pronto FTFY
/r/MensRights30/06/13 11:34 PM
1

Those are some staggering generalizations. The very idea of a "patriarchy" is a massive generalization, oversimplification, and conspiracy theory! And you've swallowed that whopper hook, line, and sinker.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 06:38 PM
1

We need to profile politicians as petty tyrants more often.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 05:13 PM
1

step 1: Delete Facebook
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:56 PM
1

If it takes money out of the pockets of the knee-jerk "we gotta help get more girls into STEM/gaming/politics/sewage treatment" idiots then I'm all for it.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:51 PM
11

They think all other men are shiftless losers, drug addicts, cheaters, workaholics who don't spend enough time with their family, and/or abusive assholes that "deserve it". They are such great guys and they will of course choose the "right" woman that would "never do that me". When it does happen though, rest assured they will be wailing and crying and wondering what went wrong since after all, "I never thought it could happen to me" and "it's not fair because I'm not one of those bad guys". The…
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:18 PM
9

I think they need to rethink this. That would imply they were thinking in the first place.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 01:26 PM
3

Also when women choose not to be a baby factory that is hailed as her own wonderful empowering decision. Note the attitude in the comments when men decide not to be bodyguards for complete strangers.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 01:22 PM
1

Falling in love completely compromises your faculties of reason, which is the only reason men get married. It's a helluva drug
/r/MensRights30/05/13 10:17 PM
16

Ask her if she needs to be taught not to drown them in a bathtub or a lake.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 12:37 PM
9

My privilege check bounced :(
/r/MensRights15/05/13 05:33 AM
0

They told me no more foreskin...
/r/MensRights15/05/13 05:07 AM
2

Surely these gals aren't so stupid as to think criminals don't work with accomplices, weapons, and the element of surprise, right? Which completely eliminates any safety you might derive from being larger, stronger, or faster than the average dude. And what about guys that aren't larger, stronger, or faster than the average? Oops I forgot: they're beneath contempt.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 11:01 PM
6

except most of my friends were black, and they stopped most of the fights. TEH PRIVILEGE!
/r/MensRights14/05/13 10:46 PM
2

cf. Poe's Law
/r/MensRights14/05/13 10:20 PM
0

"Ow, my labias!"
/r/MensRights11/05/13 05:45 AM
1

Not all blackists are like that.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 05:42 AM
2

Men aren't healthier because they are married, women are less likely to accept marriage proposals from disabled or chronically ill men Similarly men aren't wealthier because they are married, women are less likely to accept marriage proposals from underemployed and poor men
/r/MensRights11/05/13 03:50 AM
2

Kay Hymowitz is such a peach. "Men not growing up" means men aren't doing what women want them to do. Which is interesting because as everyone here knows, men having expectations on what women should do is more properly known as "oppression".
/r/MensRights11/05/13 03:05 AM
1

Won't somebody not think of the children?!
/r/MensRights05/05/13 04:33 PM
0

They accidentally a word: cunts. See it's funny because bashing MOTOS.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 04:21 PM
1

cf. Newspeak
/r/MensRights05/05/13 04:15 PM
1

Because men won't man up and do it themselves. So as with everything else a woman has to do all the work for half the pay jail time.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 03:56 PM
13

This content has been rated 100% hate-free by the SPLC!
/r/MensRights05/05/13 03:37 PM
14

Yes, institutionalised rape is the analogy FTFY.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 01:11 PM
2

"I knew I would never be elected Prom King unless I was in the Chess Club" Said no one ever.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 05:13 PM
2

TIL who fucked all my bitches
/r/MensRights18/04/13 05:05 PM
2

Thank you based mod. Is that like a RES extension that automatically adds "Thank you" to your comments? Thank you.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 04:59 PM
2

Exactly. The story was supposed to be a warning, not a How-To.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 03:59 PM
2

"Couldn't you have your balls cut off?"
/r/MensRights13/04/13 01:34 AM
1

Hoist with their own petard. The Bard would be proud!
/r/MensRights09/04/13 01:15 AM
3

If screeching ludicrous bullshit is the best she can do to support a cause she is passionate about, I'm guessing her performance on the job isn't exactly putting her on the upper management fast-track.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 10:39 PM
10

Do these people think saying that over and over changes the facts? cf. Joseph Goebbels' Big Lie Theory
/r/MensRights29/03/13 03:58 PM
43

From the comments: I left Princeotn without a husband because I didn't meet a single guy worth marrying. What a shame. She sounds like quite a catch.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 03:20 PM
3

Westboro Batshit Crazies
/r/MensRights28/03/13 10:48 PM
-14

They are definitely helping us realize how trivial our problems are with the "but what about the menz? LULZ!". Oh, and saving us from the terrible shame of mansplaining. What more do you privileged fuckers want?
/r/MensRights28/03/13 10:37 PM
3

Who needs sources when you have feels?
/r/MensRights28/03/13 12:38 AM
1

The strong shouldn't bully the weak. It follows that the weak shouldn't badger, harass, and provoke the strong into breaking that rule just so that they can use their faux victim status to become the stronger party by way of misplaced sympathy and then use that strength to bully the otherwise strong who are thusly weakened.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 11:55 PM
6

Read the first two sentences in the Aperture Laboratories announcer's voice.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 05:03 AM
1

cf. monkeys flying out of my butt
/r/MensRights26/03/13 04:46 AM
3

I wonder how women would react to someone, male or female, defining what it means to be an adult woman, and how they are failing at it. ZOMG oppression!
/r/MensRights24/03/13 07:34 PM
1

You know what men are like - provocative clothing will make them do things Fucked up, obviously. All provocative clothing will do is make (some) men aroused. That shouldn't ever mean "unable to stop themselves from raping".
/r/MensRights23/03/13 07:26 PM
1

It might be because nobody knows anybody, really.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 04:34 PM
1

how does someone stop being racist? Frequent use of a tanning bed.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 04:32 PM
2

A clueless woman taking offense not because of the actual content but rather due to her own foolish misunderstanding of it used to be a skit on SNL. Now we are to believe it is a resume builder for sainthood.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 03:57 AM
35

Don't Tell Us What To Wear: Teach Muggers Not To Mug!
/r/MensRights23/03/13 03:37 AM
1

"Bubba, I'm starting to think you don't knock over convenience stores for the money..."
/r/MensRights23/03/13 03:11 AM
3

What if you have lots of ducks claiming not to be ducks while there are also groups of swans, geese, and pelicans each claiming to be the "true" ducks?
/r/MensRights21/03/13 11:47 PM
1

There isn't any honor to be found in a kangaroo court aside from demonstrating the wit to avoid it.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 03:45 AM
8

We have "taken a lesson" from this and similar incidents, no doubt about it. I'm not sure it is the one the author had in mind though.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 12:59 AM
1

Is that even possible?!
/r/MensRights21/03/13 12:51 AM
18

I hope she can realize it. She's just going to scratch her head and act all dumbfounded when men for some inexplicable reason refuse to say a word in her presence.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 12:12 AM
10

Why oh why didn't dude just say: "We never said anything like that at all! However now that I think about it I'm sure I overheard her saying she was going to take pictures of guys in the audience and then make shit up about them for the LULZ".
/r/MensRights20/03/13 11:56 PM
0

Doctor? WTF?! I checked her bio. She is not a MD. The only people that call individuals with a PhD "Doctor" are other pompous windbags PhDs and their thralls students.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 11:02 PM
1

They should send her a letter reminding her not to drown them in a bathtub or a lake.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 10:21 PM
1

Here's a thought: If women at work behaved analogously to feminists who believe that sheer repetition of debunked statistics and myths turns falsehoods into facts it is conceivable they might not be the kind of employees that are considered for raises and promotions.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 01:04 AM
4

I think I see your problem: Trolls and delusional zealots are not much concerned with either logic or consistency. They just want to piss you off.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 12:16 AM
4

This "housework" that isn't split "fairly" never seems to include the dirty or dangerous jobs around the home: moving heavy objects, cleaning the gutters, replacing shingles, replacing the hot water heater, installing the sprinkler system, laying sod, shoveling the driveway, mowing the lawn, washing the car, changing the oil, dealing with pests, changing the tire in the rain on the side of a busy highway, checking on noises at night...
/r/MensRights18/03/13 11:45 PM
4

I believe it was that 80% of the men on OK Cupid are below average attractiveness. So it could be that is a fair assessment of that demographic. On the other hand it maps suspiciously well to Pareto's Distribution of Hookup Culture: 20% of the guys are getting 80% of the sex.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 10:37 PM
-2

I'M SORRY, DID I JUST TRIP OVER YOUR STRAWMAN?!
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:36 PM
1

WTF? With all the cases where there were underage boys involved and the perp gets a slap on the wrist, in this case when everyone involved are adults the perp gets sent to the pokey? I'm not saying what she did is fine - there is the issue of violating the teacher/student relationship. But this is fucked up, and you better believe we'd be pissed if a guy got this much jail time for sex with 18 and 19 year old women.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:19 PM
0

People also kid about doing things that those around them know they'd never, ever do. Which is the joke. The humor is the difference between the expected (he's more of a white knight and certainly not a rapist) and what he says: "So I asked her 'Hey does this smell like chloroform to you?'". If he'd actually do such a thing it isn't funny to anyone by any standard. Well except to sociopaths, and I'm pretty sure we can't talk them out of jokes in poor taste.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 02:18 AM
3

Tell men to stop killing. Tell them really, really, hard. Kind of like saving Tinkerbell.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 02:05 AM
3

Tearing down signs is something a child throwing a tantrum would do, so it isn't even an issue of free speech rights. Institutionalized neglect of the mentally challenged would be closer to the mark.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 11:55 PM
2

I translate it as: "STFU! Because: Penis."
/r/MensRights09/03/13 03:28 PM
5

It is women that have no respect for men that have no game, and it is women that desire the men that all other women appear to want. What is the instinctive insult the dipshits use? "You are just a loser with a small dick that can't get laid" It is also women calling other women sluts way more than men do it, so they are the primary drivers of this "double-standard" that they insist is clear evidence of Dat Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 03:24 PM
1

I just wanna do something special, for all the ladies in the world.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 10:37 PM
1

But attempts to legislate morality are bad news since forever. There oughta be a law!
/r/MensRights05/03/13 11:33 PM
14

Doodle of a penis? LULZ! Doodle of a vagina? SHIT JUST GOT REAL
/r/MensRights01/03/13 02:35 PM
28

And dildos. Never forget.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 02:33 PM
1

You see, they'll actually wear this one. The one that says "Warning: contents batshit looney" they won't.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:57 PM
3

Now, talk of bans or of criminalization of things like pornography often lead to people to say things like: “FREE SPEECH!” “RIGHTS!” “CENSORSHIP!” But these people are stupid. A triumphant voice calls out "Checkmate!". The sound of wings flapping. And the smell of fresh birdshit.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 05:49 AM
1

I don't think race has anything to do with it. I imagine highly paid black gentlemen, in sports for example, pay some pretty hefty income tax on their millions. What remains is siphoned away through child support. So they bust their ass to be in the very small percent that make it to that level, just to end up broke with no other job prospects once they can no longer play because everybody seems to think rich now means rich forever.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:04 PM
1

I think the term she was looking for is "useful idiots"
/r/MensRights23/02/13 09:11 AM
1

erm, strong "suit"
/r/MensRights23/02/13 09:03 AM
2

Exactly. Also we are supposed to pretend not to notice that when we help strangers, it is both men and women. If and when strangers help us, it is always another man.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 08:40 AM
3

Like a boss!
/r/MensRights23/02/13 08:37 AM
13

I'm sorry, who is going to take care of my shit? Nobody is what I'm getting from you. If I need something done I can't or won't do for myself I get to pay someone to do it for me. If I don't and my shit doesn't get taken care of, people rightly figure I'm a bonehead with poor planning skills. So when you need something done you can't or don't want to do you are free do the same. It's good enough for me, it's good enough for you.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 12:12 AM
11

Hey I'm in desperate need of baked goods and to have my laundry done. Oh you are going to step in and do some of that for me? A total stranger? Gee, thanks! In return you'd like some help with that heavy thing? I'd be delighted.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 12:02 AM
6

Oh how this True Forced Loneliness claptrap disgusts me. No one is owed love, attention, affection, intimacy, or validation no matter how much they think they "deserve" it. And nobody is forcing you to be a paranoid delusional shut-in. What the hell are we supposed to do about it? Force people to give them sex? Because you sure as hell can't coerce any of the things I listed. And I certainly don't want to be forced to sex up ugly fat hags either.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 11:16 PM
3

Because CEOs and Politicians. Plus, rape culture. Pay no attention to workplace fatalities, the homeless, prison populations, relative suicide rates, etc.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 11:00 PM
2

"But officer she was trying to rape me" Works every time.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 02:17 PM
5

False. There have indeed been female suicide bombers.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 02:05 PM
2

How do you do this without it being yet another case of guilty until proven innocent? We know she made the charge. Subsequently it is determined the charge can't be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. But is the inability to prove both that she was raped and the defendant was the rapist proof she was lying about the whole thing? That there was intent to pervert the course of justice? Only if she admits to it? Does it serve justice to create a disincentive for false accusers to recant? Edit: I migh…
/r/MensRights20/02/13 01:31 AM
1

Also a whole lot of dying as soldiers to catch up on while men take a 10,000 year exemption from conscription so the ladies can get those numbers up.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 03:48 PM
3

No. The justice system doesn't aid and abet rapists in continuing to rape their victims for years after the first rape.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 03:37 PM
2

Happy Cake Day!
/r/MensRights15/02/13 10:18 PM
2

Do you know why men think women are crazy? It’s because women act crazy. And that, dear reader, is how women ruin everything for women. wat
/r/MensRights15/02/13 07:51 AM
5

Wait...you mean when the segment of the population with the majority of registered voters is affected they might vote to change it? It's a plan so crazy it just might work!
/r/MensRights15/02/13 06:10 AM
1

Achievement get: Master of Sock Puppets.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 01:20 AM
1

A politician. Lying. To gain favor with their base. Say it isn't so!
/r/MensRights14/02/13 01:13 AM
2

Thanks I need a good laugh today. Now make it stop - I've got stuff to do man!
/r/MensRights10/02/13 03:44 PM
1

there is substantial data out their to prove that men are more likely to raise to the top of jobs. There is substantial data that men are the majority of the prison and homeless population, and that 93% of workplace fatalities are men. So using your logic men are unbelievably oppressed.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 02:59 PM
1

PROUD --Joseph Goebbels
/r/MensRights02/02/13 04:01 PM
2

I'd have to agree: If it increases awareness that these delusional zealots will lie their asses off when it suits, then yes it is a good thing.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 03:55 PM
2

Prof waves her hand. "This is not the hypocritical bullshit you were looking for" Class responds: "oh, this isn't hypocritical bullshit after all"
/r/MensRights01/02/13 02:45 PM
3

But finding a man when all that is available are "weed-smoking losers that only want to play video games and hang out" is the dire issue we need to hear about constantly? I love the articles that throw in: "When you ask gals about guys today..." It always makes me wonder why they didn't ask the guys about gals today. If you did, you'd get the OP. Or something even less printable.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 04:44 PM
4

Feminism: The belief that men have as much contempt for the average woman as women have for the average man.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 04:41 PM
5

or teh creepy.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 12:15 AM
2

Yeah we seemed to have veered into madness here. I'm trying to follow the line of reasoning that makes you a nut or a "Female Supremacist" for objecting to forced abortion and I'm at a loss.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 02:43 PM
1

After reading your comments, it seems that we should all just hate patriarchy. Then you apparently have poor reading comprehension. "The Patriarchy" is a paranoid delusion peddled by charlatans and zealots. We'd sooner believe in and blame "The Devil". At least that myth has thousands of years of history and billions of true believers behind it.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 07:13 AM
2

TL;DR: If society has expectations about women the narcissists are going to have a bad time.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 04:05 PM
5

The Great Poster Tear-down Extravaganza! At about 8:30 you can find the proposition that believing emotional arguments are somehow not valid is sexist.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 10:54 PM
1

The other Mary, perhaps.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 12:59 AM
2

women fucked all that up They had a lot of help from useful male idiots.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 05:31 PM
5

My very non-mythical mother, in an argument on this subject said: "Most men get drunk after work and then go home and beat their wives" I asked if she meant most men that would do such a thing get drunk first and that is contributing factor in the abuse. No, she insisted she meant what she said - that this is something most men do. She is not the only nutjob stating such things I have encountered in my life. But please go on and tell us how women like this don't exist and we are making it up bec…
/r/MensRights16/12/12 05:06 PM
0

"Liberal" is not a synonym for "communist" or "socialist". Nor is "Conservative" a synonym for "I hate teh gays". However surely you can see where there might be some legitimate confusion on both points.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 05:14 PM
2

The title should really be "Don't date narcissistic sociopaths" Ok but I have bad judgement and I'm not telepathic or whatever. So you go ahead. I'm just going to follow the advice and pass on the lot.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 01:20 PM
3

You may be over analyzing this a bit. It is used because it can be effective. If the target doesn't react they'll move on to the next insult. It is similar to the over analysis of the racism/misogyny/homophobia in the gaming community. What is actually going on is trolls start with "NiggerBitchFag" to see if they get a reaction. If they do, they pounce. If they don't they try the next line of attack.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 01:09 PM
3

Please take your white cause some place else, stop passing it off as men's rights. He mentioned absolutely nothing about race, this is all your construction. You are pretty clearly saying his race makes him deficient, that his voice is invalid. I'm saying, to use your turn of phrase, that is a shitty theory. You can take that shitty theory to /r/shittytheories. But let's be honest: You are trolling. Good times, right?
/r/MensRights30/10/12 01:59 AM
6

He has an opinion; His race has nothing to do with it. Race has something to do with your comment however. You are bigot. Please piss off. Thanks!
/r/MensRights30/10/12 01:33 AM
2

If you follow the link to youtube it is in the text below the video. The movie is Up in the Air
/r/MensRights30/10/12 01:28 AM
3

Wow does this make it clear it is all about women's desires and fears. Never want kids? Translation: I want kids and I want to have them within the context of marriage. I'm no "Baby Mama"! How about love? Translation: If it is "True Love", the couple will get married. And I can't be happy and fulfilled without "True Love". Stability, someone you can count on? Translation: I want stability and someone I can count on (once I'm done having fun but can still get a guy to commit; see below). Someone …
/r/MensRights30/10/12 01:20 AM
0

Not sure if Feminist...
/r/MensRights30/10/12 12:14 AM
5

Meanwhile the formerly rich heir of wealthy parents, who spent his youth and fortune chasing skirts and studiously avoiding work and responsibility, realizes now - facing a life of penury and menial work - what a fool he has been. So one by one he finds and proposes to the ladies who had wanted him to settle down with them during his salad days. How do you suppose they responded?
/r/MensRights29/10/12 11:59 PM
1

This is why the contention that because women are earning more degrees than men they are therefore better educated than their male peers is farcical.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 11:38 PM
19

Brave Lady Allie, bravely ran away Bravely ran away away, oh brave Lady Allie! When reason reared its ugly head, she bravely turned her tail and fled Yes bravely Lady Allie turned about and gallantly she chickened out Bravely taking to her feet, she beat a very brave retreat Bravest of the brave: Lady Allie!
/r/MensRights29/10/12 11:21 PM
3

There's no way I'm saying what they did is right, and I'm not saying he deserves whatever abuse he got. But wow that is a special kind of stupid. Inciting a mob never works out well.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 10:53 PM
1

I look through your submission history and (in addition to other worthwhile submissions) I see submissions that are complaints about comments and submissions. Like this one for instance. Not to get too meta here, but the case could be made that your complaints about complaints that aren't real issues in your opinion aren't real issues either. I'm just sayin'
/r/MensRights26/10/12 07:07 AM
0

"You're a pussy!" "Well...I guess that makes sense. They say you are what you eat, dick"
/r/MensRights26/10/12 06:49 AM
1

Pics or he isn't fappin'
/r/MensRights26/10/12 06:42 AM
5

This is what I call a "yes, dear" zombie. Just say no. While you still can.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 06:05 AM
3

What were you expecting specifically other than "Hope" and "Change"? Because I sure remember that being the extent of his platform, and I thought it was genius. In a P. T. Barnum kind of way. Don't get me wrong - it has been obvious to me since at least 2004 that Bush ensured that no republican will be elected president until we have an economic collapse. And even then I don't know what the Genital Oppression Police are going to do that would be helpful.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 01:36 AM
4

They're a "new breed of women"...practicing the world's oldest profession.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 03:17 PM
3

That still rules out the never, upon which much feigned righteous indignation depends.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 10:29 PM
1

In 2012 America, as she points out, women are better educated than men (women earn the majority of bachelor’s and graduate degrees) Having just any old degree doesn't make you better educated. For example I'd consider a degree in women's studies an indicator of indoctrination not education. If only we were able to find out what undergraduate degrees are being conferred by field of study and gender
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:48 AM
3

Oh how the self-righteous nitwits and the trolls love to come in here and tell us we are just as bad or worse...as something. Often never very clear since they don't want to be downvoted by their own I guess. Taking full advantage of the fact their posts will be seen as they won't be deleted and they aren't banned.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 01:00 PM
1

I still contend how a woman dresses has nothing to do with it. It has everything to do with the rapist's confidence he won't get caught or face any consequences. A provocatively dressed woman with witnesses about or who appears to be able to put up fierce and effective resistance is almost never going to be raped. A modestly dressed woman acting scared or otherwise vulnerable in an area without witnesses is going to be in trouble if a rapist shows up.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 10:08 PM
1

You are correct. I actually didn't mean to imply all women think this at one time or another, just the viciously deranged ones. The killing men part anyway.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 09:55 PM
11

When women say they want to kill off 80% of men, which 80% do you think they mean? The 80% that are below average attractiveness.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 03:30 AM
14

The guys that think all men are quick to resort to violence think that way because they figure all men must be just like them. And of course if they are real shitheels they make a big show of being saints for recognizing it, recovering from it, and then riding to the rescue of the helpless innocent dearies. Then there are the vile reprobates that make recompense by sponsoring incredibly horrible legislation like VAWA.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 03:19 AM
15

Why did you marry a bad one? How foolish of you! I'm kidding of course. All we ever hear when we point out that what passes for marriage these days is a steaming pile of horseshit is: "Don't be so paranoid - just find the right gal and it will be fine" As I've repeatedly asked, what guys are out there who would knowingly marry the "wrong" type of woman?! Seriously, any guys out there that set themselves up for failure on purpose? Chime in! Tell us how you knew it was a distinct possibility she w…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 02:40 AM
5

To the extent that feminism is synonymous with Women's Rights, of course this is true. And there is agreement that it means precisely that - when someone is said to be against it. Otherwise "Feminist" and "Feminism" have no agreed upon definitions even among those who identify as and with those words. Instead we are through the looking glass: 'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, 'it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.' The result of decades…
/r/MensRights17/09/12 11:30 PM
0

At least the fine ladies at Feministing with their Feminist Fuck You Fridays have the ovaries to say it directly rather than obliquely.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 11:09 PM
1

You have one-itis. Learn game and apply it (or not) in ways that work for you. Choose when you want to seduce women and when you don't. If the women you chose not to express romantic (or just sexual) interest in aren't romantically (or sexually) interested in you, see that as the obvious outcome and not a failing in them.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 11:35 PM
6

Actually it has everything to do with how he has treated her: Like a friend. You don't seduce women by actively trying not to seduce them. Duh.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 11:26 PM
1

I'm suggesting you might have missed your chance with this guy
/r/MensRights15/09/12 06:21 PM
4

You know you are in for some scintillating analysis when you see: Entitled prick. Go play at yr mom's basement.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 03:43 PM
4

shudder No. Practically the first scene in the movie adaptation of The Girl Who Played with Fire is a girl strapped to a bed while this older dude is pumping away on top of her. For the most part she just looks bored. Still horrifying.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 03:37 PM
1

How did he answer: Do you own a box cutter?
/r/MensRights15/09/12 07:40 AM
1

Is there a problem with the audio? I couldn't hear what they were saying. It might have something to do with the fact I was yelling WHY THE FUCK IS THE DIPSHIT GETTING MARRIED AGAIN?!
/r/MensRights15/09/12 07:34 AM
26

While it does piss me off that sensible suggestions to women to reduce their chances of being raped are all dismissed as victim-blaming... ...how they dress would seem to be the silliest. I highly doubt rapists pick their victims based on their fashion choices: "Hmm well I'm up for a bit of raping tonight. What's this? A woman passed out drunk in a dark alley and no witnesses about? But good lord that top doesn't go with those shoes at all. What was she thinking leaving the house dressed like th…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 06:17 PM
12

This much win should come with a warning label.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 04:38 PM
6

I was just replying to you in agreement, then re-read. But I think there's a big difference between men's rights within feminism Implying this is the "correct" way to address men's rights. and MRAs who aren't really fighting FOR men as much as they are AGAINST feminism. I don't think the "who" in there means "those MRAs who" but rather defining all MRAs as not fighting for the rights of men so much as fighting against the rights of women. Because characterizing someone as being against feminism …
/r/MensRights11/09/12 04:35 AM
2

Well to begin with, they aren't "true feminists". And besides...oh look, a narwhal!
/r/MensRights11/09/12 04:06 AM
5

It's Feminist Tourette Syndrome. They vomit shit from their mouths that doesn't make any sense. At least people afflicted with Tourette's don't generally believe their random socially inappropriate and derogatory outbursts are inspired pronouncements of genius.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 12:34 AM
10

I have no idea how JTO stayed calm and focused in the face of that stream of insane horseshit. Note to self: Take a klonopin before engaging with these aggressively delusional zealots.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 10:42 PM
8

Translation: "My panties are in a wad and I'm going to insult you guys too!" That's a win!
/r/MensRights10/09/12 05:24 AM
5

I don't see 72 furious replies, but I do see many variations of "when they resort to name calling, you've won the fight" Which is wisdom that should be spread far and wide. A thousand upvotes isn't enough. So this snotty quip must be your fucked up way of agreeing. Thanks for playing!
/r/MensRights10/09/12 05:21 AM
30

Bill Burr has figured this out as well: This is how they argue, as far as I can tell: If they are right, they argue the point. And they stay on point and make sure you stay on point until you are down on your knees apologizing, begging for forgiveness Alright? No problem with that - totally respect it. But here's the thing: If they are wrong, they go rogue. They go off-road. They start thinking of shit you are sensitive about - maybe you don't get along with your dad - and in their head they sta…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 05:06 AM
44

No doubt they find women being falsely accused of something this serious very offensive.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:57 AM
31

Well that's fair since a woman nagging a guy to buy things for her is a thief. Asking him to drive her somewhere? Definitely carjacking. Shows up at his place uninvited? Trespassing if not stalking. Seems legit.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 05:26 PM
10

I don't hit on women by referring to my desperate need for baked goods or to have laundry done. And if I did I'm pretty sure they'd find that insulting at best.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 02:55 PM
9

You'd think that when someone is presented with overwhelming, and consistent evidence to the contrary of their beliefs, they'd stop for a second and think, "oh, maybe I was wrong". Ironically all of human history adds up to overwhelming evidence that you shouldn't be at all surprised by this.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 10:03 PM
2

It is bad form to ask someone to prove the negative.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:44 AM
1

Our bodies, our choice, our right to privacy even in marriage. When the shoe is on the other foot, how's the fit?
/r/MensRights29/06/12 12:05 AM
6

Meet a good woman, and the need is eliminated Well I didn't downvote, but I will point out this is "let them eat cake".
/r/MensRights23/06/12 06:12 AM
5

Marriage is no guarantee you won't die old and lonely. In fact it seems to increase the chances that if you die alone you will also be broke and bitter. The regrets will be due to not having done the things you felt in your heart were of value to you. If having a relationship with a special someone is one of those, I don't know what to tell you other than make sure you do all the other things regardless.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 06:06 AM
2

I can't find where in this thread feminists are being blamed. Could you point that out for me? Thanks!
/r/MensRights22/06/12 08:27 PM
2

But...we were told "just be yourself" Now I see that it is your self we are supposed to be!
/r/MensRights22/06/12 08:18 PM
26

My not-aging-well, morbidly obese former high school girlfriend can find young, reasonably attractive men to cheat on her husband with. My overweight (but not morbidly obese) male friends of all age ranges don't get any play at all, and as mentioned elsewhere in this thread, when they try they are "stalking creepy losers". This leads one to think women have an easier time finding someone who will (just) fuck them.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 09:55 PM
4

You are starting with a faulty template. For example, the civil rights movement wasn't called "blackism" nor were its members referred to as "blackists".
/r/MensRights15/05/12 01:48 PM
2

I've never seen someone with comment karma that far into the negative. I think somebody suggested they be awarded with a flair that says "Winning!"
/r/MensRights27/04/12 06:06 PM
3

ITT it is relevant though since they were specifically asked to represent.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 06:00 PM
2

Actually I meant this fiasco I hate to give that blog more traffic, but apparently I've already linked to this in another comment, and seeing it first-hand will reveal the madness better than our discussions about it could ever hope to do.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 05:17 PM
1

Holy crap what an epic fail if that was the plan. Now it's "in before Kumbaya"
/r/MensRights27/04/12 05:06 PM
3

I tell people there are sober children in India when they won't finish their beer.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 05:03 PM
3

the majority of women simply suck at being decent human beings That would only make sense if the majority of human beings suck. Which...could be true. We aren't fans of Woman=good, Man=bad. But replacing it with opposite isn't going to get us anywhere either. Even if it seems that's what is going in here sometimes, it is mostly the lack of explicit rant tags that is the issue. 'Cuz sometimes ya just gotta vent!
/r/MensRights27/04/12 04:54 PM
2

Because we've already seen that identifying and prosecuting domestic abuse Means it is always the man's fault. and programs that assist victims. exclude men who are victims. Because they are never the victim - see above.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 11:29 PM
1

Is there any hope of saving it? Because that sub name is so on point.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 11:13 PM
19

Ah, well if it seems your initial reception is a bit frosty be aware the paranoia level is high as a result of these shenanigans.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 10:59 PM
15

Out of curiosity, did you find us as a result of any of the recent drama? e.g. the shitredditsays trolling campaigns, the SPLC putting us on a "watch list" (which was touted by our detractors as this sub being designated as a hate group), "The Punch Heard 'Round the Internet", etc... Edit: direct link to SRS added by RES removed
/r/MensRights26/04/12 10:45 PM
0

Or start to do it and then "Ahh! My back!" "I'm not going to be able to do this stuff anymore ladies. So sorry"
/r/MensRights26/04/12 06:05 AM
2

I think your point about generalizing being bad is lost because you are generalizing the membership as you make it.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 01:52 PM
6

This is what you call equality? Nope. Randomly doling out excessive sentences to women is not justice. The application of the law shouldn't depend on your sex or the color of your skin. Obviously we complain when men are consistently given harsher sentences than women for the same crime, but this isn't fair, doesn't help the plight of men in any way, and only adds to the sum total of human misery.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 10:01 PM
1

I was merely pointing out that basing the determination of whether there are "powerful women in society" based on whether a woman has been President of the United States demeans what women have accomplished in terms of leadership. Nowhere did I state they are equally represented. Also I was hoping nobody would try to imply that all of these countries are "unimportant"...but you went and did it. Let's put it this way - half of the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China) have female chief ex…
/r/MensRights24/04/12 09:41 PM
3

How can men be dominating Australian theater when Women represent about two-thirds of theatre general managers and have a strong presence on theatre boards If women are being "held back" by women...IT'S TEH MENZ FAWLT!!!
/r/MensRights24/04/12 02:48 AM
1

It's only sad because rarely will a father ever get the sort of universal thank you that is frequently heaped upon mothers. In fact they are regularly admonished on Father's Day that they need to man up and stop being deadbeats.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 02:43 AM
3

Or you could acknowledge the fact that the previous Speaker of the House was a woman. Second in line for Commander-in-chief. Or that Hillary would almost certainly be our President right now if Obama hadn't upstaged her. And we could maybe not be so parochial and acknowledge the fact that the President of India is a woman. As is the President of Argentina. And Brazil. The Prime Minister of Germany is a woman. As is the PM of Australia. And Iceland. And Thailand. And Finland. And Bangladesh. And …
/r/MensRights24/04/12 02:15 AM
3

This is why I put it as "Of course what we normally associate with FGM is unbelievably vile. So tell me how much cutting on a girl's genitals would be equivalent to MGM and if that should be allowed" Of course the answer is "no amount of cutting on a girl's genitals is acceptable". THIS is what we are comparing MGM to. Anything else is feigned outrage to shut us up.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 11:19 PM
2

There ought to be action taken to remove the trolls Even if you are banned you can still browse and vote I believe. If not, a new account does the trick. Or three. So what exactly are you proposing to solve this?
/r/MensRights21/04/12 09:16 PM
2

American conservatives want to conserve the constitution and that all men(read mankind) are created equal and have inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness That would be great if true. Instead they're all "we want the government off our backs...so it has more time to police your genitals."
/r/MensRights21/04/12 08:33 PM
5

"Generosity" at gunpoint is more properly known as "extortion".
/r/MensRights21/04/12 08:22 PM
3

If he had no intention of legally accepting responsibility for this kid, and had no intentions of being a parent to this kid, then why did he put his name on the birth certificate and why did he try to communicate with the child? Because he thought the ladies would honor their agreement and the legal system would treat him fairly. How he could possibly be this naive is another question entirely.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 01:36 PM
1

BTW I meant the trolling dimwits tried to create confusion about whether "we" thought it was cool to punch a woman in the stomach. It isn't and so neither is kicking a woman in the stomach. We are not to discuss mitigating circumstances such as self-defense because that would be misogynistic.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 01:27 PM
2

kicked her in the stomach Just to be clear, this is not okay. There was some confusion on this point in another thread.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 09:46 PM
-5

Stay classy, SRS!
/r/MensRights12/04/12 10:12 PM
2

Appropriately enough, "hen" denotes "crazy" in the sense of "way out there" in Japanese (roughly). It appears in the word "Hentai": "BIG crazy" or "Really, really out there"
/r/MensRights12/04/12 01:55 PM
1

Physiologically womens' brains are better at multitasking while mens' are better at focusing on single tasks. I thought a recent study showed nobody is good at multitasking. There are just people who think they are. Edit: I found this but it isn't the article I was thinking of.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 01:43 PM
-3

Which demographic keeps voraciously consuming this petty gossip and providing the purveyors of malice gainful employment? "Misogynist: A man who hates women as much as women hate one another"
/r/MensRights10/04/12 01:00 AM
3

WF Price's piece has more to do with his own sexual fantasies than it does with the talk I'm going to give. Ah, the old "I know you are but what am I?" gambit. Well played sir!
/r/MensRights09/04/12 10:53 PM
8

I wouldn't worry about taking this step unless and until someone credible calls your credibility into question.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 10:20 PM
8

cricketschirping.wav
/r/MensRights08/04/12 05:30 PM
0

Everyone throw away your condoms ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights06/04/12 08:59 PM
2

cf. Harrison Bergeron
/r/MensRights06/04/12 08:51 PM
6

So there is still a 17% chance that if I marry a college educated woman she will end up filing for divorce with all that entails. And 17% is a ridiculously high failure rate considering the life altering consequences. If I do everything right I'm screwed, if I'm the one who messed it up I get punished. But I don't want to get screwed despite my innocence and I don't want to be the asshole that deserves it. Pass.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 08:23 PM
2

Doing nice things for others usually comes at one's own expense. That's what being nice means. Where are you getting this from? Being nice is just being courteous and friendly as opposed to inconsiderate and rude. That doesn't cost anything, in fact I'd say it costs your soul something to constantly unpleasant. Once you start incurring "expense" there should be quid pro quo or there is an imbalance in the relationship. If you want to help or otherwise benefit someone with no expectation of rewar…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:31 PM
7

Being nice to women does actually work No, it doesn't and it isn't meant to. To paraphrase Chris Rock: You don't get a reward for doing what you're supposed to do! The issue is that boys are always told "just be nice and you'll find a special someone" and "you are so nice I can't believe you don't have a girlfriend". Ignore that foolishness. You hear this because women want the men they find attractive to be nice to them. It does not mean that being nice is in and of itself attractive. In fact..…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 12:50 AM
1

Willfully ignoring all the comments in that thread that amounted to "this seems like a troll post to try to make MRAs look bad. Or the OP is an idiot"
/r/MensRights05/04/12 05:35 PM
1

The only point is if someone says they are a feminist, and you argue against them, then by clear implication you must be for oppressing women. Apart from that defining feminism is like trying to nail jello to the wall.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 05:59 PM
21

but I can't help but think of what would happen if it was a male teacher automatically assuming the men are going to do better. I'm pretty sure at least one of the gals would black out or throw up and then dude would be fired
/r/MensRights26/03/12 10:14 PM
1

According to their guidelines, the two aren't mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 05:24 PM
2

"Check your privilege" is feminist for "STFU and GTFO because CEOs and Politicians. Plus, rape!". HTH
/r/MensRights16/03/12 04:51 PM
1

The women's rights movement, that fought to get rid of the gender specific laws and policies that prevented women from fully participating in public life if they so chose etc. Maybe we should say "we hate feminism for its hypocrisy, but to the extent it manifests as a WRM, it's awesome". That only leaves the argument about to what extent feminism is or isn't a WRM (which is never going to be "won") while making it clear we support a WRM. Rights: For Men, Women, and Children. Not "or". It's an id…
/r/MensRights16/03/12 02:38 PM
1

As has been pointed out before, this is just the swap-the-genders that we do here all the time. Also, male legislators propose things like "women as primary aggressor" laws; legislation allowing men to drop children they didn't agree to support off at hospitals, police and fire stations; mandating that 40% of coal miners are women, etc. Um, wait, men have never proposed such legislation to demonstrate the hypocrisy of feminist demands. Well regardless, since we do swap-the-genders as a thought e…
/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:57 PM
6

Feminist theory basically says that males are seen as the default human, and women are the "Other" Whereas in reality "man" means "undistinguished and therefore expendable generic human being" and "woman" means "special and important human being about whom one should care deeply". c.f. "X number of people were killed, including Y women and children..."
/r/MensRights12/03/12 06:58 PM
1

If you could buy child support insurance...
/r/MensRights12/03/12 12:44 AM
1

Present men as burbling fools ricocheting from one kitchen surface to another and you insidiously cement the idea of women being both innately suited to this work and somehow all the more superior for it. How do you stop men noticing? Give them the world How did nobody notice this WTF at the end?! So the point is that these stereotypes are just another scheme to keep women in the kitchen, and men are in on the joke because...CEOs and politicians!
/r/MensRights12/03/12 12:20 AM
7

c.f. "when did you stop beating your wife?"
/r/MensRights11/03/12 02:51 PM
5

Women's rights activists have their share of misandrists More than their share, even.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 06:09 PM
1

Er, not so sure the MRA movement wants to put themselves in a position where their leaders can also be criticized for very bad and criminal behavior, esp. towards family, women and children, and advocating incest/pedophilia. How do you figure the MRM would ever be exempt from such scrutiny? If any of those thinly-veiled accusations were true, they would have been trotted out long ago as "proof" of the "pervasive misogyny in the MRM" It seems that if damning evidence can't be found, it will be ma…
/r/MensRights10/03/12 04:11 PM
2

Or, sticking with the seafood theme: "A man needs a woman like a fish needs a hook"
/r/MensRights05/03/12 04:55 PM
2

So call any loon who uses that term "Goebbels' Disciple"
/r/MensRights24/02/12 11:17 PM
2

Obviously you'd want to lose most of the men. That way the next tribe to come along can take what they want, including the women they don't opt to kill, with no trouble. Definitely a winning strategy!
/r/MensRights24/02/12 10:41 PM
3

"I do believe that a man can be a contributor to empowering a disenfranchised group of women," she says. "I believe that it would be done by getting behind, by getting underneath, by doing fundraising, by stepping away." So, STFU and get in the kitchen?
/r/MensRights18/02/12 05:00 PM
1

Not sure if Feminist...
/r/MensRights18/02/12 04:52 PM
3

I believe at best they don't care if the facts are true, they know it matches how they (and therefore all right thinking people should) feel. At worst they knowingly spread false or misleading information. c.f. Joseph Goebbels
/r/MensRights18/02/12 03:54 PM
0

Imagine they're having a panel on women's health, and they don't have any women on the panel Imagine if they had a panel on men's health!
/r/MensRights18/02/12 03:42 PM
2

when a woman someone comes in and is perfectly cordial and open to discussion, someone always has to be a dick. Welcome to the internet. FFS.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:34 PM
1

I'm excited about this plan and proud to be a part of it --Joseph Goebbels
/r/MensRights13/01/12 07:20 PM
1

in a world wherein women have to go in groups everywhere You mean the world where: Males were almost 4 times more likely than females to be murdered [in 2005]. Female victims are more likely than male victims to be killed by an intimate or family member. Male victims are more likely than female victims to be killed by acquaintances or strangers. Seems to me that it is men that need to go around in groups!
/r/MensRights13/01/12 06:03 PM
1

Men aren't healthier because they are married, women tend to not marry unhealthy men Men aren't wealthier because they are married, women generally marry wealthier men
/r/MensRights22/12/11 05:40 AM
0

tl;dr: Be a monk if you don't want to be a father LOL!
/r/MensRights16/12/11 06:11 PM
8

Because: Our bodies, our choice!
/r/MensRights18/11/11 03:13 AM
28

So basically the men went John Galt when women started exercising their rights. Waaaaah. Cry me a freakin' river, you over-privileged wankers. ...and this is an example of what we are supposed to "man up" and marry. Do. Not. Want.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 02:56 AM
1

cf. witch trials
/r/MensRights16/11/11 11:21 PM
4

Right, I was running with your suggestion that we can make the same argument and not invoke the specter of "forced abortion".
/r/MensRights15/11/11 11:19 PM
2

I don't think it is possible. It would be like trying to explain a fish to a bicycle.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 10:48 PM
11

Ok, how about this then? Most states in the U.S. have baby safe haven laws, allowing people to turn over their babies unharmed to a local receiving organization without the threat of prosecution. Normally, the receiving agency is a hospital emergency room, responsible adult, manned fire department, or police station. You must arrive with the baby unharmed and be handed over to a person---NOT left in a lobby, doorway, or unattended. Very kind, concerned, and professional men and women will help y…
/r/MensRights15/11/11 10:34 PM
12

I mean it's Eve Ensler, so I guess coherent thought is out of the question. I am curious to know how she came up with the "one billion women violated". Assuming 3.5 billion females on the planet, this sounds suspiciously like "1 in 4". Also, what will this "escalation" entail? And what are these one billion women going to do once they "rise up"? Can these vague threats be interpreted as anything other than an attempt to create a climate of fear to Keep Us In Line? You know - just like they claim…
/r/MensRights14/11/11 11:39 PM
1

There is an old trope where someone who kills their parents subsequently begs for leniency from the court because "after all, I'm an orphan".
/r/MensRights10/11/11 04:30 AM
1

cf. Thoughtcrime
/r/MensRights10/11/11 04:24 AM
1

Goebbels FTW!
/r/MensRights05/11/11 03:42 PM
1

and let's be honest, linking directly to a controversial post/comment instead of making a screenshot is inviting a downvote brigade Right, obviously I am entertaining your premise that the OP could reasonably be interpreted as an implicit call for a downvote brigade. Otherwise nothing I said in response to you makes sense. I see at least as many "not all MRAs are like that!" comments as I see the NAFALT kind. GOOGLE FIGHT! :D
/r/MensRights03/11/11 04:39 AM
1

He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 05:30 AM
1

I'm guessing you are just trolling, but in the event there are lurkers that didn't follow: Every time somebody self-identifying as a feminist says or does something abhorrent, suddenly it is "NAFALT!" Whenever somebody in or around /r/mr says or does something remotely worthy of criticism, somehow it is representative of everyone in /r/mr, and for that matter all MRAs everywhere. That is the hypocrisy I am referring to. I think you can infer from this that I would agree that if one could demonst…
/r/MensRights01/11/11 09:50 PM
2

Not sure if Feminist...
/r/MensRights31/10/11 11:04 PM
5

So, one fucktard spouting off misandrist sexist bullshit is just...a one-off fucktard that doesn't speak for feminism, let alone all women. However if the general sentiment in /r/mensrights is that /r/SRS is a source of downvote brigades, but a single redditor links to a comment that pissed him off, surely it means every last subscriber to /r/mr was in on it, approves, and fails to see the double standard. I mean at the time of this writing it has been upvoted all the way to...ten! Holy shit you…
/r/MensRights31/10/11 11:00 PM
8

Comments like this really piss me off: I don't understand this fear of marriage stuff. I've been married 52 years Because you got married in 1959. The expectations you had, those of your spouse, and your families, and the entire culture you lived in supported the idea of marriage for life. Right now the expectations of the man, the woman, their families, and the entire culture they live in is that they are likely to get divorced. FFS.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 05:55 PM
2

Also I noticed in Terra Nova that the doctor wife is smart, attractive, and apparently does all the housework because the husband is inept at it. The husband got his ass thrown in jail in the pilot for freaking out and attacking the police when they discover their illegal third child. So he's a "hot head" that has to make up for this "mistake" because he was away from his family. That selfish prick! The older daughter is also a genius, while the son is a fuck up. The boys sometimes redeem themse…
/r/MensRights16/10/11 06:28 PM
1

cf. "Do we have to blame feminism for every bad thing that happens to men?"
/r/MensRights16/10/11 03:25 PM
1

"I just feel that men have had the upper hand for so long that..." cf. Corruption of Blood
/r/MensRights14/10/11 05:30 AM
3

I don't remember this ever happening to me when I was in my twenties. Maybe it's something about the personality traits of any man who waits until they are at the peak of their career before getting married and having kids. Or, maybe it is because you were in your twenties FFS.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 11:20 PM
1

Relevant
/r/MensRights04/10/11 09:34 PM
3

We women share in the blame for men's general arrested development when we treat them like stupid little children. Wait, so she's saying she believes this canard - the Peter Pan Syndrome meme - she just wants women to share in the blame? "With friends like this, who is needing enemas?"
/r/MensRights03/10/11 09:12 PM
1

You do realize it says right by your username you are a mod of /r/againstmensrights? That's a lot of cheek!
/r/MensRights30/09/11 10:43 PM
7

cf. "thoughtcrime"
/r/MensRights14/09/11 10:24 PM
6

Because otherwise the term "Patriarchy" would obviously not be applicable. And that's a dead horse that just can't be beaten enough apparently.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 03:38 PM
1

who?
/r/MensRights15/08/11 06:36 PM
2

If you have the responsibility and no authority, you are a scapegoat. Which is to say, "yes".
/r/MensRights15/08/11 06:35 PM
5

I am surprised the obvious evolutionary explanation is not mentioned I'm not. It is much more fun to bash men than face reality before the long ride on the cock carousel has left these "ladies" unfit to be wives. After all, it would be placing heinous restrictions on a woman's sexuality to tell her she will spend the majority of her life bitter and alone if she just can't pass up the excitement and glamor of being an unpaid prostitute in her 20s.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 06:27 PM
1

Looking at your posting history, I still can't tell if you are a troll or a fucktard. Both is an acceptable answer.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 04:55 PM
3

Please point out the "all women are evil crap", because I'm not seeing it. I can see you could make a case for "overly concerned with the worst-case scenario". But I don't see "all women are evil" anywhere in this thread. BTW I agree with you that it is harder to end up "common law married" than is implied. But I'm really, really fucking tired of this "it's teh misogyny" horseshit.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 09:51 PM
22

I knew that if we elected Obama, it would be "Hillary didn't get elected because straight white men can't handle the idea of a woman as president". Whereas if Hillary won, it would be "Obama didn't get elected because straight white men can't handle the idea of a black president".
/r/MensRights03/11/10 02:14 PM
2

"You know you're working in a patriarchal society when the word feminist has a weird connotation." Hmm, which is more plausible: 1) There's some hidden yet all-powerful conspiracy called "patriarchy" somehow poisoning the sense of the term "feminism", or 2) There have been so many loons calling themselves feminists that the term has come to imply a misandrist nincompoop with a persecution complex?
/r/MensRights12/10/10 02:30 PM
2

How in the hell does this steaming pile of misandrist throwback bullshit have upvotes? Edit: Because it is a joke! DOH! Ya got me :)
/r/MensRights11/10/10 01:30 PM
1

But if a man screws over the state with paternity fraud then it's a serious crime State makes money by being complicit with paternity fraud: Awesome sauce. State gets burned by paternity fraud: SHIT JUST GOT REAL
/r/MensRights03/10/10 04:48 PM
3

As I have pointed out before, it is men that are in a true double-standard on this: If you haven't had sex, you are a virgin and therefore "a loser that can't get laid". If you have too much success with women, you are a cad, lothario, womanizer, user, player, gigolo, man-whore, whoremonger, etc...
/r/MensRights03/10/10 04:06 PM
7

What she deserves is to be told she's a douchebag for posting that shit. I understand the frustration with an apparent double-standard. What I don't understand is the torches and pitchforks reaction.
/r/MensRights01/10/10 02:25 PM
11

Tempted fate perhaps, but...deserves? WTF?!
/r/MensRights01/10/10 02:17 PM
1

Since joining I've been rather disgusted at all the misogynistic stereotypes I've read on here. I was actually thinking of leaving. So, the agent provocateurs have done their job then. Maybe I'll stay and chime in a little more often. That's a more helpful attitude.
/r/MensRights30/09/10 08:42 PM
1

Relevant
/r/MensRights30/09/10 07:20 PM
9

It's the Turnip Brigaide
/r/MensRights28/09/10 05:20 PM
28

"But officer, I was just defending myself!" Works every time.
/r/MensRights25/08/10 11:55 PM
7

You can write/make an aggressive prenuptual agreement, Which will get thrown out that rejects the main outdated foundation of the laws: that women are weak and must be provided for. Unfortunately if it is a strongly held value by the judge, it'll be thrown out It should agree that you will be preferred custody of any children, and include admissions on her part that she would be an unfit mother, and has a propensity to be dishonest. And no provisions in a prenup ever trump the whims of a family …
/r/MensRights25/08/10 02:08 PM
1

I think your question is similar to a Muslim woman wondering how she ensures that her future husband will treat her fairly: She doesn't. The shitheads and trolls in this thread would probably advise to her to "become a lesbian" - it would be as appropriate and useful.
/r/MensRights25/08/10 02:04 PM
2

Trolling troll, trolls.
/r/MensRights25/08/10 01:57 PM
1

Since when is "not in love anymore" or "finally realized you're unhappy with the person you married" not a valid excuse for a divorce? It's that "commitment" thing that men are supposedly afraid to make. If you don't want the commitment - Awesome! Just don't call it marriage
/r/MensRights19/08/10 01:34 PM
1

Scientific studies have shown all sorts of advantages for married men Men aren't healthier because they get married - women don't marry unhealthy men. Men aren't wealthier because they get married - women don't marry poor men. So this whole thesis that marriage causes health and wealth is a steaming pile of horseshit. women are most attracted to status Which you clearly realize! So are you trolling, or are you mental?
/r/MensRights19/08/10 01:19 PM
1

bachelors are increasingly realizing why Marriage 2.0 is such a scam and don't want any part of this dirty business Should have been recalled, banned, and its peddlers sued into oblivion years ago.
/r/MensRights17/08/10 11:31 PM
9

...she called him from a Florida vacation to say that she had a job, a place to live, and she wasn't coming home to upstate New York. "He was in shock," she said. "I never want another husband," she said. "I like it just as it is." Her ex has since died. This is great - the main motivation cited when people try to convince guys they should get married is: "You don't want to die alone, do you?" Plan didn't work out so well for dude, that's for sure.
/r/MensRights17/08/10 11:26 PM
2

There is concern that violence against pregnant women is fueled by men trying to avoid a financial liability. Wait, violence against pregnant women? Like it's a trend? WTF? Pregnant women are statistically at the least risk of violent crime of all subgroups in the population. So this "concern" is either thinly disguised bigotry against men, as if men generally would beat a pregnant woman into submission, or more likely cover for anti-male bias in legislation and practice.
/r/MensRights09/08/10 09:35 PM
1

NOT ALL FEMINISTS THINK THE SAME THINGS But we knew that already: "Defining feminism is like trying to nail jello to the wall".
/r/MensRights09/08/10 08:43 PM
1

OK, so it would also be true that "targeting wealthier men socializes women to develop appetites for more and more "gifts" from their paramours and creates a culture of prostitution among women." Right? Right?!
/r/MensRights06/08/10 01:16 PM
-3

When you think about it you realize it has been obvious all along: They sure seem to enjoy flinging poo at men.
/r/MensRights06/08/10 12:18 AM
1

WOMEN NEVER LIE ABOUT NEVER LYING ABOUT RAPE!!!!!!!!
/r/MensRights23/07/10 05:35 PM
3

My father always told me that life worked like a pendulum. It swings too far one way (the extremist nature of men and their abuse and misuse of women) and that the pendulum swings too far the other way (where we are now, with women treating men the same way they were treated). That's exactly how my mom describes the situation in the few cases where she does acknowlege that maybe men are in a no-win situation these days. however... He said it's our responsibility to grab that pendulum and stop it…
/r/MensRights22/07/10 09:37 PM
3

tl;dr: Defining Feminism is like trying to nail Jello to the wall.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 08:29 PM
1

Convict first and sort the facts out later. FTFY
/r/MensRights16/07/10 01:49 PM
7

women are exempt from consequences. Otherwise: "Oppression!"
/r/MensRights16/07/10 01:45 PM
3

"Oh, that's not really feminism." c.f. moving the goalposts Defining feminism is like trying to nail jello to the wall.
/r/MensRights07/07/10 09:58 PM
4

A feminist in 2010 is someone who takes pleasure in kicking a man while he is down. Could have left out "in 2010". And probably "while he is down" too.
/r/MensRights07/07/10 09:49 PM
1

You can't dismiss the whole for a few unfortunate members. Party pooper.
/r/MensRights11/06/10 01:12 PM
1

Um, not so much. Got a similar lecture from a clueless friend of mine in San Francisco while we were out at dinner. I asked "have you ever talked to them?" He replied that he hadn't really, beyond "Here you go, good luck man". So we talked to the first homeless guy we ran into - a guy offering to draw your picture on a piece of cardboard with chalk. So as we are talking to him, he says "Everyone tries to give me food. Fuck that shit. I need money to get me a hotel room and some pussy." I said "W…
/r/MensRights14/05/10 02:20 PM
13

And from the article: He says there was no noticeable difference between their recovery times or their immunity. "But the women did complain more," he added. Heh, so much for the claim by women (and their male sycophants like the bootlicker you are talking about here) that it is men that are "big babies" when they get sick.
/r/MensRights25/03/10 02:12 PM
2

A woman can use her exceptional good looks to achieve some measure of fame and perhaps fortune. A man who is rich and/or famous is thereby attractive to women. So the equivalent would be to promulgate a meme that poor, low status men are just as attractive as rich and famous ones.
/r/MensRights24/03/10 11:42 PM
4

On the plus side: Safeway does have a week for prostate cancer donations to match their week of breast cancer donations. On the minus: Every time I go through the checkout during breast cancer week, I'm asked if I wish to make a donation. I have never been asked nor overheard anyone else being asked to make one during prostate cancer week.
/r/MensRights24/03/10 11:17 PM
2

And Senator Reid, while he is at work, tends to be offensive.
/r/MensRights23/02/10 02:20 PM
0

because these baby mommas are very promiscuous and haven't a clue. FTFY. We know without question that these walking sperm banks were definitely neither selective nor cautious by their own admission. You do not know that about individual men caught by her shotgun accusations.
/r/MensRights22/02/10 09:23 PM
-1

The reason why feminism has half the subscribers that men's rights does is clearly because 'feminism' is largely irrelevant Uh, no. It's because the user base of /r/mensrights is mostly sock puppets from /r/feminisms and /r/TwoXChromosomes. FTFY.
/r/MensRights21/02/10 03:48 PM
-5

redditor for 19 hours says: If you guys wish to be taken seriously Irony. U haz it!
/r/MensRights19/02/10 11:17 PM
12

One note of caution. I would never suggest outlawing based on this but it's something to consider: it could very well become a new weapon in an abusive man's arsenal. It's not difficult to imagine a man lying to his partner about having taken the drug in order to get her pregnant and lock her in. Well calmer heads certainly prevail over there :/
/r/MensRights18/02/10 07:44 PM
2

No, you contine to miss the point. Only men who are extremely bad or extremely rich/famous/influential get noticed. The rest of us can get stuffed. And as for this whopper: Even more women are economically...disenfranchised than men are. An interesting fact from the July 11 issue of Fortune magazine: Women will control 60% of all wealth in America by 2010. Reality: 1 Ideology: 0
/r/MensRights18/02/10 06:56 PM
2

Noticed those extremely rare and unusual men did you? Thanks for making the point!
/r/MensRights18/02/10 06:28 PM
91

The same goes for a vasectomy. Most single women would run a mile from a man who’s had one, even if they don’t particularly long for children, because we don’t really like our men making unilateral decisions, whether that’s about curtains or babies. Our Bodies, Our Choice: When the shoe is on the other foot, how's the fit?
/r/MensRights18/02/10 02:50 PM
5

Everyman is a redshirt
/r/MensRights18/02/10 02:18 PM
1

She said: ''I said they look after us, and he asked if the men behave a little bit more when the females are around. ''He then turned to the guys and said: 'We have got to have women amongst us - it keeps us civilised.''' Imagine the uproar if he had said "We have got to have women amongst us - they can sew buttons back on and bake pies"
/r/MensRights18/02/10 02:09 PM
1

I go back to my "paternity tests should be standard at birth" stance... It's the only decent solution I can see. Upvoted - most women recoil from this idea like vampires from garlic.
/r/MensRights18/02/10 02:02 PM
0

The reason MR is even an issue is because a select few women have gone way overboard in promoting women's issues. This shouldn't be about rallying "against the women", this is about equality. Good luck with that - I've become convinced that women are without empathy, and that all their protestations that they are in fact the nurturing gender is a pretty lie they desperately want to believe. In truth they have no concept of honor or even fair play, and are generally unconcerned with the welfare o…
/r/MensRights16/02/10 02:50 PM
1

Before the internet, all you had was the media that vilifies males at every turn And especially friends and family gaslighting you. Yes, now men know they aren't crazy, their experiences aren't unique or even unusual, and it isn't their fault. "I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve." - Yamamoto
/r/MensRights16/02/10 02:41 PM
1

Well, 1) Way to miss the point while making mine: Women have this option at their convenience, men do not in the circumstances we are discussing here and 2) Absolutely agreed and I'll take it a step further and say that the only way for a man to have sex and not become a father at his partner's whim is to have a vasectomy. This doesn't prevent paternity fraud however, as being incapable of fathering a child isn't any more compelling than a DNA test disproving paternity.
/r/MensRights14/02/10 04:21 PM
1

The obligatory not all women are like that comment, from that thread. ;)
/r/MensRights14/02/10 04:09 PM
1

Yes, women have one more choice than men do, that doesn't give men the right to abandon their offspring. I find it telling that when this comes up, the "Men have to be responsible for the child" crowd very convieniently forgets that women also have this right Most states in the U.S. have baby safe haven laws, allowing people to turn over their babies unharmed to a local receiving organization without the threat of prosecution. Normally, the receiving agency is a hospital emergency room, responsi…
/r/MensRights13/02/10 04:52 PM
4

Chivalry: Thwarting Sluts-On-a-Bender Since the 12th Century!
/r/MensRights13/02/10 04:33 PM
3

That is because they are only remaining group that is fair game for bigotry: If the target isn't straight, you are a homophobe. Hate crime!!!!!!!! If the target isn't white, you are a racist. Hate crime!!!!!!!! If the target isn't Western, you are a xenophobe. Hate crime!!!!!!!! If the target isn't male, you are a misogynist. Hate crime!!!!!!!! But if the target is a "straight, white, western, middle class, cisgender male", you are a hero. Keepin' it real!!!!!!!!
/r/MensRights13/02/10 03:34 PM
4

A spokesman said:"...Making a positive public decision to a committed, life-long relationship changes behaviour - especially for men." "We have found that men coming for weddings are as interested in their relationship and the quality of it as in the day itself." A spokesman? A spokesman?! Some random spokesman just conveniently starts insinuating that men who don't get married need their behaviors changed? That otherwise they aren't really interested in their relationship? A spokesman can kiss …
/r/MensRights11/02/10 11:56 PM
7

Resolution, a group of family lawyers, said the legal benefits of tying the knot should be extended to cohabiting but unmarried couples. Vice-chairman David Allison said: "The majority of people don't understand that living together does not give them any financial protection should the relationship end." IOW: With fewer marriages, there will be fewer divorces and WTF are the divorce lawyers gonna do then?
/r/MensRights11/02/10 11:44 PM
3

That is the name of the subreddit under discussion You should go tell them how wrong they are. Please post back over here with a link to that thread, I beg you.
/r/MensRights09/02/10 02:32 PM
2

Wow. Epic comprehension fail. The equivalent would be to put a fake mustache on a girl with short hair and then parade her around calling her by a boy's name. If that happened you'd know exactly what it is: Enforcement of Gender Norms. This has nothing to do with making a statement that girls are inferior to boys. FFS.
/r/MensRights08/02/10 11:34 PM
6

Tasty you said this: I've begun removing bigoted slurs from my vocabulary and find it to be quite mind-opening. Open your mind to the following and its clear implication in regards to your statement above and the OT: If someone views me, someone who has done next to nothing for the movement outside of posting on reddit, as a representative of the movement, people need to either expand their universe a little bit and step out of their parents basement or they need to do a little bit more research…
/r/MensRights08/02/10 11:28 PM
12

Mustache wax: $2 Puppy: $45 Closing down a women's shelter: Priceless!
/r/MensRights08/02/10 11:05 PM
1

An intelligent post pointing out that most murder victims are male and how that should at least lead you to question the assumption that society is better for men than women Um, I think that is exactly what the comments are implying: Women are peopler compare with Some animals are more equal than others HTH!
/r/MensRights08/02/10 07:17 PM
3

But in this case the victim and his "bad behavior" were partly to blame, he said. The victim "started the ball rolling, philandering with others besides his wife, who was putting bread on the table and taking care of his children," the judge said. Blame the victim - awesome! If a group of men did something similar to a cheating wife, we all know the outrage would be endless, and any attempts to place blame back on her for "starting the ball rolling with her philandering" would be met with righte…
/r/MensRights04/02/10 02:34 PM
1

should everything you say here be disregarded and considered biased because you're in a mensrights subreddit? As opposed to...?
/r/MensRights02/02/10 09:18 PM
2

Surely there is a joke for misandrysts in there... Q: What about all the widowers, divorced, and single men that will starve to death? A: Who cares?!
/r/MensRights02/02/10 09:10 PM
5

Good point - guess I won't be marrying any 1,000 year old women then!
/r/MensRights02/02/10 02:55 PM
1

Pretty good prediction - it's 7,412 atm
/r/MensRights31/01/10 10:14 PM
1

Misandry is a real word too, as are Mythology, Zealotry, and Calumny.
/r/MensRights31/01/10 10:10 PM
1

So it's to be CUNNY law then?
/r/MensRights28/01/10 02:57 PM
2

Rape is a crime and, like any other crime(theft, fraud, assault, murder), everything that can be done about it, is being done about it. That really nails it. Why the downvotes? Anyone who did so care to step up and explain?
/r/MensRights27/01/10 02:25 PM
3

The men who would actually commit rape are profoundly broken These aren't normal guys that have an odd fetish. We can't talk them out of it. They are sociopaths. We can no more "stop them" then we can stop serial killers before the fact.
/r/MensRights27/01/10 02:12 PM
1

HTH
/r/MensRights27/01/10 05:12 AM
1

This and other comments keep coming back to this double standard canard. It is men who are in a double-bind: Are men "chaste" and "virginal" if they choose not to be promiscuous? No, they are "losers" that can't get laid, meanwhile men are referred to as womanizers, lotharios, cads, and users if they are too successful seducing women. Even "Player" is a mixed-bag - in some circles it is a mark of honor, in others not so much, hence "Player-haters".
/r/MensRights27/01/10 12:43 AM
4

This is like the incredibly offensive campaign: Men Can Stop Rape Seriously? How exactly are the 98% of men who would never, ever rape going to stop rape? Maybe we could finally get around to making rape illegal. Oh wait... But the real kicker is: How likely is it that the sociopaths that would rape women are going to suddenly realize "Oops, I guess I shouldn't rape - my bad!"
/r/MensRights27/01/10 12:08 AM
1

The one in four thing is complete horseshit and has been repeatedly debunked. I won't bother to provide a link as it is not reasonable to expect me to prove the negative, it is up to the promoter of this outrageous and misandric claim to prove the positive. Otherwise you are a troll, or worse: an agent provocateur deliberately fomenting hatred and disgust towards men.
/r/MensRights26/01/10 11:58 PM
2

I try to not confuse feminism with the psychopaths that claim to be feminists. Their dementia doesn't necessarily reflect on feminism, though you'd think as a community they'd want to reign in the loons. And as I've pointed out before, feminists can't seem to agree on what feminism is or what it means to be a feminist. However here that isn't even the issue since this particular loon does not consider herself a feminist. She is just a nutjob. Her blog is simply a window into the mind of a sociop…
/r/MensRights22/01/10 07:06 AM
1

It has been implied but not explicitly stated in the comments so far that what we have right now is not marriage. Some have taken to calling it Marriage 2.0 to disambiguate. Marriage 2.0 is what we used to call "going steady", i.e. "Let's be together until we decide we don't want to be together anymore" with the addition of a framework of legal punishments and financial obligations (generally inflicted upon men) upon termination. So any discussion or debate about "saving the institution of marri…
/r/MensRights22/01/10 02:54 AM
6

Wait. In the study, the women who believed they were good looking were more likely to respond angrily in disputes than those who rated themselves as less attractive. So the title is totally misleading. Should read: Narcissists 'anger more easily' And that ain't news.
/r/MensRights22/01/10 02:39 AM
5

Wow she has some balls herself. I'm thinking we need to root around her crotch and see what's up. Got Gloves?
/r/MensRights22/01/10 01:36 AM
3

I knew parents that also suffered from this delusion that sex-based differences in toy selection and play were determined solely by culture and left to their own devices, their kids would play with both "boy" and "girl" toys equally. They too had to admit maybe there was something to that biology thing when the girls all wanted to play mommy to and tea party with the dolls, and the boys tended to want to play build, race, and rumble with trucks and tanks and trains.
/r/MensRights22/01/10 01:13 AM
3

A wise man once said: Defining Feminism is like trying to nail Jello to the wall. Don't get me wrong - I eagerly await yet more amusing attempts to do so.
/r/MensRights22/01/10 01:00 AM
1

I left a comment which I will also place here in the unlikely case it fails to pass moderation: It occurs to me that considering the USA I grew up in socialized me to believe Women were perfect Goddesses and men vile, despicable demons who have been and are still responsible for all evil in the world…I’m thinking maybe your idea would gain more traction if you referred to this transfer of funds as a tithe rather than a tax.
/r/MensRights22/01/10 12:49 AM
6

Yeah but the authors seemed to have reversed cause and effect, as they always do when contrasting the state of married men to that of unmarried men: Poor men don't remain unmarried simply because they are too dumb to realize marriage would (putatively) make them wealthier. They are unmarried because women generally won't marry poor men. Granted, wives might stick with a husband who is currently unemployed if he has a history of gainful employment. Just not for long.
/r/MensRights20/01/10 04:25 AM
16

I believe most women who have spent more than a semester at a university are exactly "like this". And yes, I do include my mother and sister. They make the most astounding and convoluted claims of pervasive misogyny while simultaneously being completely unaware of their own obvious and blatant misandry. For example, in an argument with my Mom, she proclaimed that "most men get drunk after work and then go home to beat their wives" I replied "Surely you mean: Most men who would beat their wives d…
/r/MensRights18/01/10 11:15 PM
7

Don't confuse her with the facts!
/r/MensRights18/01/10 10:48 PM
1

It is threads like that that have turned me against a woman's right to abortion on demand. If Men's reproductive rights are of such little concern, then Women's reproductive rights DEFINITELY do not trump those of the unborn child. My thinking had been that I don't care to invite the government into what should be a private decision. But since the majority of voters seem to think indentured servitude for men is just fine - EVEN IN THE CASE OF FRAUD - I've already lost whatever liberties I though…
/r/MensRights18/01/10 10:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter