TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

blublanket94 Archive

View 0 posts and 50 comments by blublanket94 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Seriously dude?
/r/MensRights21/04/19 05:12 PM
3

he would probably object to her stealing his shit regardless of how drunk or sober he is, so the analogy is a really shitty one
/r/MensRights29/07/16 01:36 PM
1

atleast here in northern europe muslim women have a reputation for integrating far better than the men
/r/MensRights19/12/15 01:27 PM
-1

I think asians spank white men in terms of work ethic.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 11:55 PM
2

holy shit that was a smackdown
/r/MensRights07/12/15 06:59 PM
2

any link that isn't blocked in eu? :)
/r/MensRights20/11/15 11:57 AM
1

Hey, I already replied to you, but I didnt properly explain why no true Scotsman doesn't apply here. I'm not saying something along the lines of "oh, a reaaal liberal person would xxx", I am simply showing that by definition they are clearly not liberals.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 05:00 PM
1

I didn't giggle a single time.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 10:05 AM
2

I was just trying to show that progressiveness is not an American idea in response to you bringing up the roots of the movement. Read John Locke's work, here is a good place to start: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke-political/ If they advocate for redistribution of wealth, they aren't very liberal, are they? I am referring to the academic definition, not the one that was spawned out of american politics.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 08:29 PM
2

I made a small comment saying that liberals and progressives are different, and it spawned this huge debate. People refuse to use google or wikipedia to check me on it, so it spawned what you see above.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 08:05 PM
2

This is the first reply to my comment that I pretty much entirely agree with.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 07:47 PM
1

It does not matter how your government behaves when discussing the definition of words used by political scientists to describe certain beliefs. Their actions and words don't somehow change what words mean. While words certainly can change over time, you only have to look at much of the rest of the world to see that they are indeed two different things.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 07:45 PM
2

Progressivism was discussed before that by European philosophers such as Kant and Condorcet. There is a big difference, L and P, anyone who even bothers to read the wikipedia entries on the two topics would understand that. Regarding what you said about the P and Ls in Europe probably not being that different, you almost could not be more wrong. In my country atleast, they are not even on the same side of the Y axis on the political compass, the liberals want lower taxes, and the progressives li…
/r/MensRights22/10/15 07:21 PM
0

Sure, but they are misnaming themselves, and I don't think that the definition of a word that is used by political science academics should be changed just because one country gets it wrong.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 07:12 PM
0

That seems more like progressive behavior than liberal behavior. From what I've seen both parties in the US do a fair bit of appealing to emotion. Every debate includes the candidates talking about how poor their families were and how they struggled to get to where they are now. All of that is an appeal to emotion. While I couldn't tell you which side does it more, you can hardly claim that only the American left tries to appeal to people's emotions.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 06:21 PM
0

What do you mean?
/r/MensRights22/10/15 06:15 PM
1

I disagree. I'm just trying to point out that having only two main parties does not allow for nuanced and specific views, almost anywhere else in the world the two words have different meanings. I can completely see why someone who only follows US politics would not be able to see the distinction between the two terms, but re framing and misusing words does not help anyone. Just look at the political compass: https://www.politicalcompass.org/images/bothaxes.gif Left and liberal are not even on t…
/r/MensRights22/10/15 05:54 PM
5

wtf does socialism have to do with this? please realize that liberal has a definition independent of what it has been whored out to mean in american politics.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 05:49 PM
1

Completely fair to argue that, but thats because when you only have two main political parties, they tend to fall on the same side of the spectrum. Just because a political system fails to offer diversity in terms of expressing more precise views does not mean that the word "liberal" should be whored out and misused.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 04:49 PM
0

are you American? because with a two party system the two tend to fall on the same side, so I can see why in your mind they might be one and the same. but anyone who studies even a little bit of political theory can you tell that they are different, and the only reason they are often used interchangeably is the result of a faulty political system that polarizes issues.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 04:47 PM
59

SJWs aren't liberals, they are progressives. Liberals value individual rights while progressives are willing to sacrifice individual rights, and in some cases harm individuals, in order to get closer to their perceived perfect society. The idea of safe spaces is very much a progressive one rather than a liberal one. Edit: If you down vote please explain your view point.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 01:04 PM
114

this smacks of the feminist 1 in 5 women are raped "statistic"
/r/MensRights30/09/15 02:48 PM
13

Jesus christ that woman is insane.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 04:17 PM
4

That's a pretty childish comment bro
/r/MensRights31/07/15 12:29 PM
7

I completely agree, I think that what MRAs are upset about is that you only hear people talk about how bad it is that top corporate jobs are mostly held by men while no one cares that most inmates are male. The argument is that you have to take both into account if you want to try to make some sort of "justice" between the genders.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 05:29 PM
13

Yes but this is like saying men have more top corporate positions because they work harder, and whenever I do that, some feminists get very upset.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 05:21 PM
0

What?
/r/MensRights19/07/15 03:55 PM
4

In that light, I don't find this as petty.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 03:33 AM
7

Oh come on guys, this is feminist level petty.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 11:19 PM
1

"Ableist" lmfao. Grow up. Didn't call you a bigot either, just said you were derailing. I'm starting to think youre a troll.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:06 PM
3

I will joke about whatever the hell I want.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:03 PM
2

Classic SJW tactic, derailing by accusing the other person of being racist/sexist/whatever.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 03:20 PM
2

Are you autistic? I just implied that it wasn't an argument.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 07:15 AM
1

Says the one who replied "Yes?"
/r/MensRights14/07/15 08:49 PM
1

In all my irl or internet arguments, I have never met someone who comes across as stupid as you do.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 07:05 PM
1

"Someone has to be responsible. If they had the same amount to drink, Jake would have been less drunk and more in control, leaving him the responsible party."
/r/MensRights14/07/15 03:38 PM
2

Please, I don't even call myself an MRA and have never been called one before, I'm just trying to explain to you how your logic is flawed and you're completely failing to defend your argument. No on is playing the victim here other than you with the usual "ohhh the man needs to take responsibility!!!111" Now please continue to try to do that, or fuck off and never write such stupid things again.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 01:44 AM
3

Please don't stop replying, I'm enjoying this insight into how the world works through the eyes of a misguide social justice warrior.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 06:25 PM
4

What if we were at a house party, and went outside and drank alone to talk to each other for an hour? What if I paid with cash? What if someone bought me drinks? What if I drank on my own before going out? Seriously, your view of how things should/would work is so disconnected from reality.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 03:03 PM
7

What so you're supposed to just take a guess as to who is more drunk? How will that work out in court? What you're arguing for has no place in reality, I'm guessing that you aren't old enough to go out yet.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 02:34 PM
6

Ouch bro. I'm sorry.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 05:37 AM
14

Doesn't say anywhere that they had the same amount to drink, just both drunk.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 03:56 AM
4

I feel like thas very telling of the current politcally correct non-sense climate.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 01:19 AM
0

Moron.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 03:52 PM
1

No, she was not theoretically raped. Grow up.
/r/MensRights03/07/15 01:37 AM
7

This isn't rape. He chose to consume the drugs, and he chose to fuck the fat chick. He wasn't forced into anything.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 06:49 PM
3

come on man
/r/MensRights30/06/15 10:16 PM
4

Are men more like to drunk drive?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 07:11 PM
5

Who paid for this? This just looks like some guy who felt like making a video.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 08:09 PM
6

So a women shouldn't be held accountable for her actions just because "being a women is stressful"? Grow up please.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 01:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter