TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bluePillBall Archive

View 0 posts and 29 comments by bluePillBall on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Most normal men who want to function in society do not start cold approach women like a bunch of PUAs. What the fuck are you talking about dude? People talk to people they don't know all the time in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/15 07:38 AM
2

In TRP mythology, being good looking definitely makes you alpha (or, at the very least, is conducive to it).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 03:45 AM
9

"There's no such thing as SMV. There's no such thing as SMV. There's no such thing as SMV." Repeating a lie over and over does not make it true. I don't think any rational person (male or female) says that there is no such thing as SMV. For example, it's obvious that a 19-year-old blonde with fake tits and sexy legs has a lot of social stock at a bar or in a club. With that said, I think we can all agree that the term SMV (Sexual Market Value) is a bit retarded; like most PUA/TRP terms, it repre…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 03:28 AM
1

Perhaps you should be sent to North Korea and once you don't follow the social script, start taking a lessons from some North Korean dudebro who will integrate your weirdo western ass into North Korean society. And clearly, integration to society is always good, so you should accept that instead of resisting. Hyperbole notwithstanding, I think you completely missed my point. What are you, a social anarchist? If so, you've got bigger problems. Ironically there's no such thing. So your argument is…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/15 10:42 PM
2

Why the fuck do I assume I need your list just because I'm refusing to accept your atrocious generalizations and accusations about Nice Guys? My list would help you better fit in human society. Is your life's goal to go all Elliot Rodger on us? And here I thought BluePillers were against inferring things based on gender roles. But obviously, it's only wrong when men do it. I'm not any kind of pill. I'm just a normal fucking human being. Lol. Maybe women should learn how to fucking speak, then? I…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/15 08:29 PM
2

Secondly, they mostly fall in love with women for the same reasons other people might, because they're close to them as friends and develop feelings for them ( Yeah, that happens, surprise! ), or they think those women share similar interests to them, or they like some aspect of their personality, or they are attracted to them because they're showing them attention and other girls don't. What the fuck is wrong with thinking highly of someone who is willing to accept you? You think there aren't t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/15 08:07 PM
0

most of these assertions aren't true. Autistic robo-man alert. First of all, no TRP'er is comfortable in his own skin. That's why they circle-jerk around the idea of "lifting weights" like a bunch of fucking neanderthals. Second of all, I've yet to see a TRP'er that hasn't had a bad experience with a woman because they were, at some point, a husk of a man that bent to every woman's desire. Well guess what, if you're a naive idiot, people will take advantage of you. So what happens? They inevitab…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/15 06:19 AM
-2

TRP consists almost solely of guys with psychological issues. Most come from broken homes, have had bad experiences with women in the past, and none of them are comfortable in their own skins. It's not hard to see that TRP is a "Fight Club"-esque defense mechanism.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/15 02:51 AM
0

However like most PUAhate guys he blames genetics more than his lack of effort to improve himself. There is some truth that Chads hit the genetic lottery but other guys could easily be Beta Bux. Why would you be pissed off? You still get paid.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 10:14 AM
13

What could you possibly say to this poor individual? His claim is genetic superiority is everything, and yet he dresses like shit, probably smells like shit, smokes cigarettes, has a god-awful haircut (what kind of fucking weird-ass mullet is that?), has no style, and is very obviously overweight. On top of that, his attitude is garbage. Note that all of the above are not genetically determined. So.. check and mate?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 10:12 AM
4

Sounds like you want to suck his cock dude. Chill out.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 07:40 AM
-3

A lot of OP bashing in this thread. I personally think he behaved well within norms, apart from one subtle (and one big) mistake. /u/redbluepilling as well as /u/AlphaAsFAQ are both way off base here. I had a very similar situation happen to me in Vegas about 6 months ago (except that me and the girl in question did not have sex previously, as is OP's case). So let me break it down, since I have some first-hand experience: Background: I had invited this girl that I had been seeing (technically a…
/r/askTRP20/10/14 03:50 AM
1

Reality check: you don't know how to read.
/r/askTRP04/10/14 07:03 AM
7

You should ask her to hang out again casually. If she's into you she'll agree. If nothing else, this is a pretty hilarious story.
/r/trpGAME02/09/14 05:17 AM
1

Dude everything you say reeks of PUA bullshit and is a complete conversation killer. Me: Hey little stalker. How you doing? Oh wow, negging, so 2000-late. Just say fucking hello or use some non-pseudo-insulting thing. Me: Haha... But what about the Chinese kid we were going to adop so he can make iPhones for us? Uh.. what does this have to do with her previous message? You could say all kinds of things about love, but instead choose to go with some awkward story you two came up with when drunk. …
/r/askTRP26/08/14 06:17 AM
1

I'm not trying to be an asshole, but to me this is just crazy. An analogy would be "I sent out over 500 resumes and only got two interviews." If that happened to anyone either (a) they are lying and didn't send out 500 resumes or (b) their resume is absolute shit. Like complete garbage. So it's difficult for me to comprehend how socializing, being fun, dressing nice, and putting your best foot forward in a setting where most women go to get laid has not gotten you laid after "years of doing it."…
/r/askTRP18/08/14 10:00 AM
0

I choose to be top 5% in income. Not only is that more future-proof, but it also has a higher impact in quality of life and access to women (clubs, events, and so on). If all you have is a body, you'll be the bouncer that checks my name off the list.
/r/askTRP18/08/14 09:42 AM
0

I'm not sure what makes you believe that you need a body like that (apart from some indoctrination here and on BB.com).
/r/askTRP18/08/14 09:32 AM
1

Of course it does. It puts you in a different income bracket. If you make 70k, you make more than 85% of people. If you make 100k, you make more than 94% of people. 10% of any metric should be something you can use to gain a significant advantage.
/r/askTRP18/08/14 09:06 AM
1

You need to read those studies again. Facial attractiveness is what the study dealt with. Sorry to break it to you, but all the lifting in the world won't help you there. Just don't be a slob and live a healthy lifestyle with a healthy diet. No gym necessary. Go hiking, swimming, boating, etc. I strongly believe that alpha fucks/beta bucks is a false dichotomy, but to each their own. Note that nowhere do I mention flaunting your wealth. By analogy, flaunting your looks is equally pathetic.
/r/askTRP18/08/14 08:56 AM
1

My post was a retort to: 3% is one in 33. That's a lot of people if you're a young woman.
/r/askTRP18/08/14 08:36 AM
1

At a club with 100 people, you have 3 competitors. I'm not sure how that's a lot of people. Suppose we don't allow the bottom-50% of the population to attend said club. Now you have 6 competitors (this is more realistic in high-end clubs which I attend). Given that the 1-10 grading of women tends to scale linearly (e.g. 10% of women are 9+), and suppose that we have a 50-50 ratio in the club, there are now 6 males that make six-figures for 5 women (50/*0.1) that are rated 9+. This gives you a 5/…
/r/askTRP18/08/14 08:23 AM
1

Your argument makes no logical sense. Turkeys also "evolved over billions of years" but hens prefer certain colors in the tail feathers of their mates. Elephants also "evolved over billions of years" but their females prefer certain types of tusks. Etc. Do you get the pattern? Ever species is different. Homo sapiens sapiens has only been around for 50,000 years or so. We've always had bigger brains than our counterparts (e.g. the Neanderthals) so the argument that big muscles illicit some kind o…
/r/askTRP18/08/14 08:12 AM
2

If by "tons" you mean 3% (dividing 6% by two), then sure. I don't know what to do with the thousands of dollars I save every month while still going to Vegas every now and then and going out every other weekday. Do you live in Manhattan?
/r/askTRP18/08/14 08:01 AM
2

This kind of attitude is just ridiculous. Making six figures as a single male (i.e. 100k+) puts you in the top 6% of the US -- more money than NINETY-FOUR PERCENT of people. You hardly need to be a 0.00001-percenter to live a very comfortable lifestyle, get an amazing pad, and a luxury vehicle. All of which are status symbols that hold a lot more weight than 6-pack abs.
/r/askTRP18/08/14 07:49 AM
2

Our species -- Homo Sapiens Sapiens -- has only been around for about 50,000 years. To claim that human attraction has evolved over billions of years is incredibly misleading and scientifically inaccurate. With the advent of a larger brain came behavioral changes that favored mates with social status (as opposed to big muscles). Social status is gained primarily through money and power. Ergo: stay in school, not in the gym.
/r/askTRP18/08/14 07:38 AM
1

Nothing. Nowhere in my post did I say I closed anything. Just that living a fun and exciting life is conducive to having women into you and that given what OP claims, I highly doubt no women are into him. It just makes no sense.
/r/askTRP18/08/14 07:28 AM
-6

Lifting heavy weights (and by extension, muscles) are from a bygone past where the strongest man could win the affection of the woman. We live in a society where education, money, and fame trumps physical prowess. Go to school and make six figures. It's time better-spent than 5 days in the gym.
/r/askTRP18/08/14 07:18 AM
0

This is either a troll post or grossly untrue. I'm also 28 and a V. I don't think it's really that big of a deal anymore. This year I decided to go out and start having fun -- which I've always had a moral tenet against. Since then, I've gone skydiving, done coke, smoked weed, dropped acid, etc. (Protip: one thing I learned is that doing drugs is a very very easy way to get access to very attractive women. You don't have to be a junkie, but snorting a line every now and then never hurt anyone.) …
/r/askTRP18/08/14 07:07 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter