| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Big oof!You might find that saying less will help people to believe you more. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 14/07/21 10:02 PM |
| 3 | Big oof!Sounds like this is the only expensive restaurant you’ve ever heard of: these markups really are insane. You could get a Michelin-star haute cuisine version of this for half the price at most. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 14/07/21 09:30 PM |
| 1 | Big oof!6 shots of Johnnie Walker Blue for $552 dollars. Could’ve got a whole bottle for that. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 14/07/21 09:25 PM |
| 1 | That “male privilege” thoughOk. Well, since this has devolved into a shitfest because I clearly won the argument, you can consider this my last response, bud. Next time, try much, much harder. Wouldn't it be refreshing, for once, to see someone whose argument was total crap just admit they were wrong, instead of continuing to respond to achieve some desperate sense of self worth? You are wrong, accept it you fucking dipshit. Nobody respects you or will agree with you just because you keep replying. | /r/MensRights | 15/10/17 10:42 PM |
| 1 | That “male privilege” thoughIt takes two to tango, bud. | /r/MensRights | 15/10/17 10:35 PM |
| 1 | That “male privilege” thoughAnd lo, he presented as much as he ever did, by pasting a snivel. | /r/MensRights | 15/10/17 10:29 PM |
| 2 | That “male privilege” thoughA couple of users have wanted me to “leave” the sub/thread, as if my comments make them uncomfortable and they want to continue hating the world they’ve envisioned without distraction. I’ve not been abusive, in contrast to the users who have called me a prick and cunt, as if after seven years on reddit alone I could be so easily offended. This rather reinforces my point, which is that much of this content is both emotional in nature and lacking its supposed substance. The trend that the sub is m… | /r/MensRights | 15/10/17 07:47 PM |
| 2 | That “male privilege” thoughTake a course in critical thinking, it looks like you need it. | /r/MensRights | 15/10/17 02:25 PM |
| 3 | That “male privilege” thoughIf you bothered to read the other comments of the OP, you’ll see I did, including providing a link to a barrister’s breakdown of the case. Really, this is not arcane, it’s just reading. | /r/MensRights | 15/10/17 11:16 AM |
| 3 | That “male privilege” thoughYou seem not to know the first thing about these issues as they manifest in the law, preferring to refer to the fact of the issue rather than examine its substance. I’m not your school teacher, I don’t care if you believe me, especially since apparently you won’t understand until you see for yourself, which I would uncharitably assume you’re just too lazy to do. You also take quite personally, and on behalf of others, anything I say about what I’ve observed. This isn’t an inspiring engagement wi… | /r/MensRights | 15/10/17 01:10 AM |
| 3 | That “male privilege” thoughThat... Is extreme arrogance. This is what you get when you take a comment apart in linear order like that. Yet later you knew the context and disregarded it, so perhaps I'm talking to a wall here. Then why don't you be silent for a moment and hear them? Instead of butting in at the first opportunity, wait, listen. See past the anger for a moment and listen to what people are saying. Check the timestamps if you really want to, but I had the time to read a lot of responses. I read at least 50 com… | /r/MensRights | 14/10/17 11:46 PM |
| 3 | That “male privilege” thoughDo you have any idea of the amount of men on here who have been verbally, physically, emotionally and sexually abused by women. Yes, and out of 160,000 it isn't many. I've been here a while now, and I can tell when people are bandwagoning and brigading based on trivial events and normal insecurities they've found in their own lives, rather than out of an empathy they've found with others'. This is not to say that the few who have legitimate complaints don't deserve a hearing, of course they do. … | /r/MensRights | 14/10/17 11:21 PM |
| 0 | r/relationships defends a psychotic woman vandalizing and stalking a man and his pregnant wife for the high crime of “stealing” seven of her fertile years... Scary shit!Good Lord, a sober thought from you. Perhaps there is hope. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/17 10:48 PM |
| 2 | That “male privilege” thoughPerhaps joke is an inappropriate word, but the posts here have a glee to them. Finding something that seems to confirm their suspicions seems to bring an excitement to the responses. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/17 10:46 PM |
| 0 | r/relationships defends a psychotic woman vandalizing and stalking a man and his pregnant wife for the high crime of “stealing” seven of her fertile years... Scary shit!Ah, so your position is that because you perceive injustice and hypocrisy on the other side, you should fight fire with fire. You don't actually care about the men in these examples, so long as you can use them as fodder against the Feminazi enemy. Good luck with that, I'm sure no one will think it undermines real-world action by debasing your own argument. And after all, you don't care about the real world so long as you have this sub to vent in. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/17 05:47 PM |
| -1 | r/relationships defends a psychotic woman vandalizing and stalking a man and his pregnant wife for the high crime of “stealing” seven of her fertile years... Scary shit!Which users do you reckon are needed here? Presumably ones who don't question the emotional ramblings of children who confuse artificial outrage with important issues. At some point you'll need ambassadors to leave the bubble, you know. They're going to be corrupted by infidel practices like thinking things through. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/17 05:37 PM |
| 0 | That “male privilege” thoughI love this sub. Even the most basic analysis of a poor argument is seen as trolling. It's like a haven for people who have no faith in their position. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/17 05:29 PM |
| 1 | r/relationships defends a psychotic woman vandalizing and stalking a man and his pregnant wife for the high crime of “stealing” seven of her fertile years... Scary shit!I remember a time when people put effort into this. Probably before every little point of view was given its own sub. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/17 05:27 PM |
| -1 | r/relationships defends a psychotic woman vandalizing and stalking a man and his pregnant wife for the high crime of “stealing” seven of her fertile years... Scary shit!I guess we should be glad your impotent blathering is confined to the internet, since it must be painfully boring to listen to. As a favour to your crippled self-esteem, though, I’ll give you a thumbs-up for having the broadness of mind to assume I’m a woman. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/17 12:30 AM |
| 1 | That “male privilege” thoughReally you might want to broaden your reading. If you haven’t understood anything I’ve said, you’re going to do very badly if you try this in the real world. | /r/MensRights | 13/10/17 10:07 PM |
| 0 | That “male privilege” thoughMaybe it’s because your foot is usually in your mouth, but you should know these are separate body parts. | /r/MensRights | 13/10/17 09:49 PM |
| -1 | r/relationships defends a psychotic woman vandalizing and stalking a man and his pregnant wife for the high crime of “stealing” seven of her fertile years... Scary shit!Yeah I guess the guy should just wait for her to kill him. The prison guards will be safe talking to her. After all it isn’t possible to have a conversation by phone, or to have other people present, nor for the meeting to be recorded. All he can really do is ignore her and hope she’ll leave him alone. | /r/MensRights | 13/10/17 08:46 PM |
| 0 | That “male privilege” thoughAsk a trauma surgeon why they bother, then. We should really close A&E departments since they’re apparently useless. | /r/MensRights | 13/10/17 08:37 PM |
| 0 | That “male privilege” thoughIf you stab someone in the hand, is that an attempt at murder? If you shot someone in the foot, is that an attempt at murder? You might want to study some biology before you try to kill someone. Do you see why details matter? | /r/MensRights | 13/10/17 08:26 PM |
| 0 | r/relationships defends a psychotic woman vandalizing and stalking a man and his pregnant wife for the high crime of “stealing” seven of her fertile years... Scary shit!The OP never thought of that, and I bet he’s glad that reddit is here to tell him what his immediate reaction should be. Oh wait, he was there for advice on what to do next, which requires thought and perhaps discussion. That makes more sense, doesn’t it. | /r/MensRights | 13/10/17 07:28 PM |
| 0 | That “male privilege” thoughYou said she tried to kill him, no one in the case did, and your argument seems to be that the absence of one thing implies the presence of another, which you’ve failed to back up with a single example of relevance. You’re misusing a trend to prejudice your view of a particular case - despite the difference between trends and rules is that the former has exceptions - and you apparently didn’t even know the particulars of the case when you first commented on it to cast your opinion. This makes fo… | /r/MensRights | 13/10/17 07:24 PM |
| -1 | That “male privilege” thoughI can only suggest you read the thread again, you don’t seem to have understood it. | /r/MensRights | 13/10/17 06:12 PM |
| 0 | That “male privilege” thoughSorry, when you try to kill someone, the fact that you failed isn't mitigation. If the charge had been attempted murder, but it wasn't, probably because there was no evidence to suggest she had a) meant to kill rather than harm him, nor b) been reasonably able to do so if she had meant to kill him. A man with no arms can want to stab someone to death, but since he can't actually do that, he wouldn't be prosecuted for the offence if he made what attempt he could. Are you seriously joking here? No… | /r/MensRights | 13/10/17 06:06 PM |
| 1 | That “male privilege” thoughIf you read the link, she showed signs of mental instability beyond violent behaviour (turning the knife on herself after attacking him) and the offence the prosecutor had chosen had a scale that went far beyond the injuries that the man sustained. If he had received life-threatening injuries then she would have had a harder sentence, but he didn't, and that was part of the scale used. If you can find a similar case involving a man who was sent to prison, it would have relevance. But you can't d… | /r/MensRights | 13/10/17 05:33 PM |
| -3 | r/relationships defends a psychotic woman vandalizing and stalking a man and his pregnant wife for the high crime of “stealing” seven of her fertile years... Scary shit!A bit of time on this sub and you pick up stock phrases like that, but good luck engaging in a debate about this with anyone not signed up to the echo chamber. As I said, neither I nor that thread was blaming the victim, just offering realistic advice about what he can do. The police can only do so much for you, and being an adult involves finding what you can do without them. | /r/MensRights | 13/10/17 05:10 PM |
| -13 | r/relationships defends a psychotic woman vandalizing and stalking a man and his pregnant wife for the high crime of “stealing” seven of her fertile years... Scary shit!I don't see anyone in that thread blaming him for what she did, they're just trying to get him to de-escalate with her in conversation by showing that he actually understands her perspective. The top replies are all to report the vandalism and any harassment to the police. When the problem is with someone's behaviour and there isn't legal recourse until they do something to you, what do you think sensible advice would be? Escalate confrontation just because you're in the right? What does that ac… | /r/MensRights | 13/10/17 04:00 PM |
| -1 | That “male privilege” thoughI guess it's easier for you to learn a single number than to actually look into cases, I get how law can be tricky to understand, but here's the background so you can address your own ignorance: https://thesecretbarrister.com/2017/09/26/update-an-oxford-medical-student-stabbed-her-boyfriend-with-a-bread-knife-so-why-did-she-not-go-to-prison/ | /r/MensRights | 13/10/17 02:53 PM |
| -6 | That “male privilege” thoughSentencing is always based on prior behaviour and remorse, of course the no-priors young student didn’t get the full weight of the law on her. Edit: In case you're comparing this to, say, black men in the US (where I believe a 17yo is more likely to go to prison than college), this is in the UK where we apparently have a rather different approach to sentencing. Not so many private prisons nor police and courts who think locking people up is the best way to address problems. | /r/MensRights | 13/10/17 02:25 AM |
| 5 | That “male privilege” thoughHe didn’t just touch them, he grabbed them hard enough to cause bruising, she told him not to do it again, and he continued doing it so she stopped the sex. Pretty sad to see it here, this is a case of someone having rough sex forced on them. It’s not the joke the OP implies. | /r/MensRights | 13/10/17 02:21 AM |
| 1 | Cuz only men can declare wars...The British Empire paints a different picture. | /r/MensRights | 15/09/17 12:34 PM |
| 0 | Cuz only men can declare wars...The article put it down to division of labour under queens, which left them free to pursue foreign policy in a way kings didn't give themselves time to do. | /r/MensRights | 15/09/17 11:42 AM |
| 10 | Cuz only men can declare wars...There were far more kings than queens, so if only a couple of queens went to war they'd be a larger proportion of their set. There's also a case to be made that a country willing to accept a queen (which especially after Magna Carta was more in the hands of nobility than simple succession) may also be advanced enough to expand empires. Elizabeth in England, Catherine in Russia - they were both historically placed to open relations with some countries, forming new treaties including mutual defenc… | /r/MensRights | 15/09/17 11:19 AM |
| 1 | When I ask women why girls get much better grades in school, they usually say they are just naturally better at studying etc. When I ask women why men earn more than women, it's discrimination.Exactly. Business is less fair than that. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/17 11:22 PM |
| 14 | When I ask women why girls get much better grades in school, they usually say they are just naturally better at studying etc. When I ask women why men earn more than women, it's discrimination.Not really - if Chinese kids tended to perform better in school, but were unfairly overlooked in the workplace, that would be a clear problem of racism. Industry has never been as meritocratic as school, and parents can literally buy their kids a better education. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/17 06:00 PM |
| 0 | Actual equalityIf me calling out those that lead the feminist movement alienates the "good" feminists who are only concerned with protecting the brand, then so be it. I just wrote that long post calling them out, but you reject it because of a word. It's pretty clear you only care about the feminist name, not actual male issues First time male issues have been mentioned. I get the idea of the sub, but its target is not reducing discrimination against women, it's reducing discrimination against men. These are s… | /r/MensRights | 30/05/17 08:42 PM |
| 0 | Actual equalityWhere do you reckon you're getting, when you alienate the people you agree with by conflating them with the people you disagree with? This sub has as little influence as I do, and seems to be a sink for people who are happy to make the basic category error I've described - which is at least easily mistaken for misogyny. If you want to have any impact whatsoever, you need to get egalitarians on your side, and you won't do that because they call themselves feminists. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/17 06:45 PM |
| 1 | Actual equalitySince NOW seems to be the main organization cited, see if you agree with a) their mission statement from 1966 (the theme of which is equality, even beginning, "We, men and women..."); or b) the new paragraph above it that says: NOTICE: This is a historic document, which was adopted at NOW’s first National Conference in Washington, D.C. on October 29, 1966. The words are those of the 1960s, and do not reflect current language or NOW’s current priorities. To read NOW’s current Statement of Purpose… | /r/MensRights | 28/05/17 12:43 PM |
| 1 | Actual equalityI did, but that was its most meaningful product. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/17 11:40 PM |
| -1 | Actual equalityCampaign group Women Against Rape Are you kidding? See above. Okay, read this. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/17 08:36 PM |
| 2 | Actual equalityPushing herself as a "good" feminist and defending feminism just protects the brand name. I thought it was the bad feminists ruining the brand? Or is a century of effort nothing compared to a couple of Twitter factories? Sure, you're technically right, but at this point you're just defending shitty people and shitty movement, and your special snowflake feminist subset doesn't change that. Many words are misused in politics, but are you against patriotism if you're against the PATRIOT Act? Are yo… | /r/MensRights | 27/05/17 08:15 PM |
| 0 | Actual equalityDictionary definition of feminism: the doctrine advocating social, political, and all other rights of women equal to those of men. If a person adheres to that, they aren't so much following ideology as assuming that women are people - this is the unicorn we're talking about. If such a basic concept is controversial then you might see why people question your view. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/17 07:54 PM |
| -2 | Actual equalityThat chip on your shoulder might be blocking your vision. If you can't accept a feminist who just wants equality, it starts to look like you just hate women. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/17 06:11 PM |
| 1 | Actual equalityShe still supports the feminists in power that push for the exact opposite of what she believes in Your evidence? And are people not allowed to have differing approaches to feminism, that -ism that's had four distinct iterations? This is like pointing to embezzlers and blaming capitalism, or to North Korea and blaming socialism. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/17 06:08 PM |
| 4 | Imagine the outrage & hysteria if an article like this was written about women: "So thirsty I could drink the pool"Try swimming. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/16 04:05 PM |
| 1 | Briar MacLean reprimanded for stopping a knife-wielding bully at school.Exactly. I can't really believe the comments here, or that this is an issue. What if the bully had decided to stab both kids? Where is the value in rewarding a child for jumping in front of a knife? | /r/MensRights | 02/06/13 04:18 PM |
| 9 | This wasn't in the rulebookThe Metro is the stuff the Daily Mail couldn't even sell. | /r/MensRights | 25/04/13 03:38 PM |
| 5 | Seddit, a year ago I was at the low point of my depression. Then I found you guys. This is my last bottle of anti-depressants. Don't let anyone tell you that this won't help you be happier.Fluoxetine and escitalopram are mild antidepressants. Venlafaxine is a 10,000 volt battery pack balanced on your genitals, do not make sudden decisions with that shit. | /r/seduction | 03/08/12 12:01 AM |
| 197 | Things to whisper into girl's ears at bars.There's also a chance that the boy will come up to you later that evening. | /r/seduction | 27/07/12 12:02 AM |
| 93 | A Summary Of Mindset Changesi got some work cut out for me. i've got a lot of fun to be having. | /r/seduction | 16/07/12 07:59 PM |
| 2 | Where do I find Girls?In the park. Take up jogging, get a dog, stand by a playground and compare the children in a carrying voice. | /r/seduction | 27/05/12 09:03 PM |
| 11 | Amazing opening tip I learned from an experienced PUA. If you tell a girl she's friendly, she will be.http://i.imgur.com/UBZp7.jpg | /r/seduction | 15/03/12 06:01 PM |
| 4 | Amazing opening tip I learned from an experienced PUA. If you tell a girl she's friendly, she will be.Only against psychics and ghosts. | /r/seduction | 15/03/12 06:00 PM |
| 2 | I'm nobody special, but here's what I've learned in the last yearIf you're going to do something, do it right. | /r/seduction | 13/03/12 02:38 PM |
| 5 | The Social Accessory – How to Be Valuable to WomenBeing an interesting person and living an interesting life should primarily be for yourself. If you do it in order to impress other people, your happiness will be dependent on the reception you get. | /r/seduction | 30/12/11 08:21 PM |
| 1 | A good response to the 75 cents on the dollar canard.Except to go from "75" down to "47" skews the argument in the mind of the person you're talking to, as their head is still in percentages. It presents an incorrect picture of the maths. Whereas the 78% of the hour is much closer to the 75c figure, and demonstrates that the numbers are close to fair. Sure, with a second of brainwork you realise that 45 minutes = 75% of an hour, but some people won't go to that step, and some of those will repeat the argument incorrectly as 47% of the hour, which … | /r/MensRights | 11/09/11 04:09 AM |
| 2 | Epic rejection by text message. What the heck happened?Ignore her and move on. | /r/seduction | 16/08/11 12:04 AM |
| 2 | The most important question from a woman a man must always be prepared to answer.I'm not talking about making yourself do things that you don't enjoy. I'm talking about looking beyond what you do at the moment and seeing if there are other things that you would also enjoy doing. If you have tried every activity in the world and decide that you don't want to do anything other than sit in the basement and play WoW, then fine. But probably more than 99% of people could find something that they like doing, that they don't do at the moment. Sports freaks who have never tried WoW … | /r/seduction | 09/08/11 08:24 PM |
| 2 | The most important question from a woman a man must always be prepared to answer.If you make life more interesting for yourself, it'll be more interesting to other people. There are a million other fun things you can do other than eat Doritos and play WoW. | /r/seduction | 09/08/11 03:16 PM |
| 4 | /Xpost from r/FFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUU "NICE GUY" credit to keithdokhttp://i.imgur.com/ztpGt.png There's an extended version of this one where the guy points out what a bitch she's being. Then there are the points made by redditors (including - omg - female ones). | /r/seduction | 17/05/11 08:12 PM |
| 2 | What are women thinking?On what grounds? | /r/seduction | 15/05/11 03:52 AM |
| 3 | What are women thinking?I'd like to see some citations on both sides before this goes any further. | /r/seduction | 15/05/11 03:37 AM |
| 2 | Cross post from Psychology: The hidden power of smiling:D | /r/seduction | 12/05/11 03:24 PM |
| 1 | Just some general male advice you guys might find interesting.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xx_ov2NiNo4&t=4m20s | /r/seduction | 12/04/11 04:13 PM |
| 9 | Just some general male advice you guys might find interesting.I didn't know John Locke even heard of computers. | /r/seduction | 12/04/11 04:05 PM |
| 2 | Quick trick - Do not call girls by their desired nicknamesDidn't that piss him off? | /r/seduction | 15/03/11 09:07 AM |
| 7 | Hi... I'm Your Sex Offender Neighbor. Man on sex offender's list for 15 years for having consensual sex with his current wife when she was 1635 / 2 + 7 = 24.5 Way out of line. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/10 04:27 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter