TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bluest_light_ Archive

View 2 posts and 37 comments by bluest_light_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

He hides behind psychiatry as a way to legitimise the same old red pill narrative he's just regurgitating... I don't trust him If you have even an elementary level of psychology studies, you'll know that psychology is far from being a science, at most it's science-related (many universities class it as such). As much as they try to, psychology can't be used to justify abhorrent and 1-dimensional views about relationships.
/r/ExRedPill07/12/24 07:47 PM
11

She's an obnoxious 'pick me' who doesn't believe her own bullshit. She preaches traditional values yet she's in her late 20s and unmarried. She just jumped on the red pill bandwagon because it's what's 'hot' right now, and she figured a female red piller is bound to garner way more views, and it did. She doesn't contribute any real, original ideas or thoughts - she just regurgitates what the red pill crowd have been vomiting up for years, and people eat it up because its a woman saying it. She's…
/r/ExRedPill01/04/23 11:24 AM
6

hide your girl
/r/ExRedPill23/12/20 03:35 PM
9

Peak alpha poon slaying chadness
/r/ExRedPill23/12/20 03:31 PM
15

You’re totally right. I’m only 21, but looking back at guys I’ve dated I let a lot of stuff slide that I really shouldn’t have, and my relationship with my ex has sort of been like the ‘last straw’ of me tolerating crappy behaviour from men I’d date. It’s about realising you really don’t have to take that rubbish from someone just because you want them in your life. And like you said, with experience you become more able to spot manIpulation tactics and generally abusive behaviour whereas before…
/r/ExRedPill09/08/20 01:37 PM
4

Exactly, a great deal of them are genuine narcissists and psychopaths who use this philosophy as a veil and defence to mask their true motives of just wanting to fuck people over.
/r/ExRedPill03/09/19 10:15 AM
3

Emphasis on “sexually interested” because with ‘game’ you're actively preventing your partner from ever being interested in you for you - for anything other than your self-constructed sex appeal. You're basically sabotaging any chance of a meaningful and real relationship forming. It’s funny because with ‘game’ you think you’ve won but you’ve actually just made yourself a slave to the sexual power women have over you. And I don’t think any person who isn't a psychopath or narcissist can fool the…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/08/19 05:23 PM
8

There's nothing quality about a relationship built on games and deceit. That's not a relationship at all.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/08/19 08:09 PM
1

I never knew there were so many single mothers on online dating sites until i found this subreddit. damn.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/08/19 07:01 PM
1

"all i ask is dinner is involved" of course you do...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/08/19 04:23 PM
3

Thank you, that makes a lot more sense to me. Yeah that guy was basically looking for a fucktoy, so I see how what I was offering was basically useless to him... that being said I don’t know why he didn’t just stop dating me when I told him. Anyway, would you suggest I don’t tell guys I’m dating that I’m a virgin early on? I’ve noticed I’ve attracted some guys for the wrong reasons e.g they go for me because they themselves are inexperienced or they’re fuckboys and want to tick “sex with a virgi…
/r/RedPillWomen02/08/19 07:24 AM
6

Wow your second point was really helpful I never looked at it that way. "You must be worthy of your premium pricetag" so how does a woman make herself worthy of it do you think? I've had a few guys (fuckboy types) who have called me a prude for being a virgin and for not sleeping with them on the first date, is this a tactic guys use to try and get me into bed with them? Or is it just them genuinely looking down on me for being inexperienced? which leads me to wonder do fuckboys/playboys see vir…
/r/RedPillWomen01/08/19 05:51 PM
11

I personally don't think waiting until marriage is a good idea in today's climate. Like you said most guys just move on to the next girl who will give them sex. Instead, I personally just don't have sex outside of a committed relationship, which I think is a lot more realistic and acceptable. It also really helps weed out the fuckboys.
/r/RedPillWomen01/08/19 02:44 PM
1

This. Idk why there are so many blue pill women in this subreddit.
/r/RedPillWomen01/08/19 07:46 AM
1

I personally define casual sex as any sex outside of a serious, committed relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 11:10 PM
1

I’ve known a dark triad chad and a positive uplifting chad. And I’m pretty confident the dark triad aka asshole chad didn’t get nearly as much sex as he tried to make out he did. Positive uplifting chad (who was sort of a friend in high school) was just a genuinely good person with a good heart. Not a malicious bone in his body, both guys and girls liked him. Dark triad chad on the other hand, whom I briefly dated was narcissistic, rude, and manipulative which eventually led me to decide against…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 11:08 PM
5

Just for your safety I'd say don't smile at them. There are creeps who might follow you, I've found it's best to just ignore, and don't look at them. A lot of deluded creeps interpret you as little as looking at them as a green light to pursue you. Though I admit I throw them a flirty glance if they're a cute and don't look like a weirdo ;)
/r/RedPillWomen23/07/19 04:40 PM
4

Well with this guy i realllly liked (he was 8 years older) I did feel like his experience and status was both admirable/attractive as well as intimidating. I definitely felt inclined to agree with him and go along with whatever he wanted/said, partly because he was ahead of me in life. I don't think it's a bad thing, I like a dominant man and I like to be led a lot of the time, but because of that some older men can easily use and abuse that influence and power over us (i don't think my guy did …
/r/RedPillWomen13/07/19 06:52 PM
1

i'm not saying your partner is for sure like this, i don't know him, but you've mentioned his lack of affection, which makes sense since a lot of these redpill guys do have a very one-dimensional and harsh view of relationships and women in general. And these red pill guys do just want a woman to stay in the house, which if that makes you happy then that's totally fine, there's nothing wrong with being a housewife, but because you're so young you might not want to throw away all other options e.…
/r/RedPillWomen13/07/19 06:30 PM
13

He’s lying. He just wants to get into your pants.
/r/RedPillWomen11/07/19 01:04 PM
7

It’s just nature, how we evolved. I totally know what you mean though, I remember I used to dress quiiiite tomboyish 17-18 and I remember hardly getting any male attention and not feeling entirely comfortable in my own skin.Then I starting naturally gravitating towards more feminine clothes;dresses, heels, wearing light, natural looking makeup etc. And I noticed a significant increase in male attention I got, and I felt more comfortable and happy in those clothes. So yeah I think it’s just how w…
/r/RedPillWomen04/07/19 07:14 AM
6

You said you feel uncomfortable in your own body, and this lack of confidence most likely shows; not just in you but in everyone, men and women. when it comes to what's attractive, i think confidence is a big one for both men and women. it's great that you're working on treating your anxiety, i don't know if you're seeing a therapist but it might be something to look into if you think you need help with building your confidence. and i'm 20 and i haven't done much with guys either, i know it's so…
/r/RedPillWomen03/07/19 12:57 PM
13

personally what i do to avoid being used by guys is to not have sex with them until they commit. it's pretty simple.
/r/RedPillWomen21/06/19 02:09 PM
4

sounds like all you care about is sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/19 09:38 PM
1

I've known a guy who I totally loved, but wasn't insanely attracted to, and a guy who I did not love but was insanely attracted to. I choose the former. every. time. that love is unparalleled. if you're emotionally and romantically attracted to someone, then physical attraction is inevitable i think. it may not be an intense, rip-your-clothes off attraction, but it's still physical attraction which is preceded by an emotional attraction. i was physically attracted to the first guy, only because …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/19 07:20 PM
7

A lot of people on here have got it wrong. the main reason is not women trying to get commitment; some girls do think they can get a guy to commit by giving him sex straight away (which often doesn't work of course), and it isn't totally because women are just as sexual as men (we are, as in we want sex just as much as you do, we're just way more selective about who we have sex with). it's because, like a lot of people have already pointed out, women are very agreeable and compliant to not just …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 04:05 PM
2

there's so many things wrong in this post that i don't even know where to start
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 06:12 PM
2

It’s true. Women fundamentally want commitment, which isn’t just giving a women attention, it’s vowing to not have sex with other women and not give other women that attention. And Men fundamentally want sex. But the thing is, most women are giving sex to men who have no intention of committing. Back in the old days, women would withhold sex until the man committed to her. So a lot of men in this day and age don’t really see why they should give a woman commitment, when they are already getting …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/19 08:37 AM
5

Of course. Love has limits, there’s no such thing as altruism tbh and there’s no such thing as a totally selfless act. There’s no such thing as unconditional love. And I don’t really see why we should want love to be unconditional; that would mean that someone could abuse us and we would still love them... by giving away love without conditions it would make it actually devoid of value and meaningless. So it’s a good thing that love is conditional; just because it isn’t selfless and unconditiona…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 11:25 PM
2

i wasn't defending it, or using that as an "excuse" for my particular case, but a reason why women in general don't do it. like i also said, it's because women in general don't prioritise housekeeping over education and working.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 10:26 PM
16

this is more of a problem in the redpill community and MGTOW i think but yeah I agree in all these "pills" there is this really cold-hearted one-dimensional view of relationships and sex in general tbh. Of course love is real. If you're questioning whether it's real or not you just haven't felt it yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 09:58 PM
1

yes she acknowledged there were differences but she did argue it was due to environment, that's why she thought they could be balanced out through environmental methods, and education counts as an environmental method of achieving this. she did want women and men to be equal in society though; she wanted women in politics, education and she also advocated women to become physically fit. these were all positions dominated by men. you can argue that these are all objectively good things for women …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 09:24 PM
1

Monogamy kept societies stable and civilisation intact. Provided both parties, man and woman, fulfilled both their sides of the bargain, which was basically the responsibilities and duties which came with their traditional gender roles. But since this hasn't been the norm for decades now, Western societies in particular are unstable. ​ also, the industrial revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 09:00 PM
2

She looked at the differences in the way men and women functioned in society and immediately assumed it was due to social conditioning, and not our determined biology. I'm reluctant to hold it against her too much though; evolutionary psychology wasn't a thing in that time, evolution wasn't even recognized, so if I was in her position at that time I might have thought the same. But she thought that by introducing women into the same occupations and positions men, society would function better wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 08:47 PM
1

Wollstonecraft was a misguided.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 08:35 PM
3

and also we're conditioned to value and prioritise education and work over housekeeping and in general being a wife and having children i think
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 08:31 PM
4

just wanna say that one reason why so many women don't know how to cook and housekeep is because of our introduction into the workforce and education... girls are preoccupied with studying from 7 - 21 so we don't have time to learn to cook proper food, you know, the kind our mothers and their mothers spent literally hours in the kitchen preparing, and when we leave education and go into the workforce, even if we get married we have to work as well (unless the man is earning a high income)...i th…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 08:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter