TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

blushingpancakethrow Archive

View 5 posts and 124 comments by blushingpancakethrow on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I think you're making too big of a deal out of [...] I hate this kind of cop out. I'm making a "big deal"tm about clearly expressing your opinion in the least provocative way. If you don't see the value of this in a subreddit which has the word debate in its name I don't know what you're doing here. Using the phrasing "X is disgusting" to mean "X elicits disgust in me" is perfectly common in other contexts. Okay, so feel free to use this phrasing when the context makes it clear what you mean. Wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 07:58 PM
2

We call this emotion disgust. But look at how language is interpreted. The phrases "sluts are disgusting" and "I feel instinctively disgusted by sluts" carry different connotations. The first suggests that it's sluts who are inherently disgusting, the second emphasizes that the disgust is a reaction of the person making the claim. The first seeks to rebuke sluts or express some other form of disapproval, while the second makes it clear that you are accepting responsibility of your own emotional …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 07:37 PM
1

Aight I'm done
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 05:19 PM
1

But you can't judge that correctly So you can't trust anyone not to rape you? Not your dad, not your gay cousin?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 04:41 PM
1

I said "it makes no sense to be wary of someone who you judge to have a 0.000001% chance of raping you", which is not a statistic but a conditional statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 04:23 PM
1

Can you point out what statistic I gave, and how it breaks my argument?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 03:45 PM
2

You don't have a posteriori knowledge before the event. ... By definition of what statistical inference is, yes, you don't have a posteriori knowledge. Also, I don't agree that the 1 in 6 statistic is correct, and so am not going to have an argument assuming that statistic as a premise.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 03:31 PM
2

Ok, but the point is that there are varying degrees of risks. A woman should judge men based on their character, their relationship with her, and the context. While if you draw the logic to its limits every man is a potential rapist (just like every man is a potential lottery winner), it makes no sense to be wary of someone who you judge to have a 0.000001% chance of raping you. It makes no sense to take precautions against that, because the chances are virtually 0. So calling every man a potent…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 03:04 PM
2

That's why I postulated they're both complete strangers.... Anyway, so since specific characteristics affect whether a man is more likely to rape (you specifically or whoever) or not, would it make sense to be more wary of specific men than others? Additionally, would you say the chances of any man to rape a woman are high enough that she should be cautious of everyone, including say her dad, or the guy she just bought groceries from? Or are there some men that a woman shouldn't be wary of.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 02:52 PM
2

So for example, would it make sense to be more wary of someone who's been in jail for violent crimes before, than an upper middle-class white male, when it comes to being raped? Assuming both are complete strangers.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 02:29 PM
1

Ok, let's take it step by step. Does the premise that some people, based on their character or socioeconomic status, are more likely to be X than Y, make sense to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 02:17 PM
0

Americans own guns because they either like firearms, have use for them, or are simply paranoid. The first two reasons are okay. The third is completely irrational. The percentage of people who get murdered every year is so small that if you actually own a firearm in case you might need to defend yourself against an intruding murderer, you probably also buy lottery tickets because you think you might win. You might say that in particular crime-laden areas there is a higher percentage of getting …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 02:04 PM
13

Yes, just like every person is a potential murderer. So you should be very careful around people lest they murder you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/16 12:55 PM
1

/r/fitness
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 02:39 PM
1

RP: Cover your bases with conventionally attractive traits (linear model/fishnet approach) What precludes a BP from doing this? This seems like a "beta" vs "alpha" difference to me rather than BP vs RP. The quotation also talks about Beta game, not Blue Pill game. Otherwise this is an interesting observation and I think I agree with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 01:18 PM
2

Hmm but you can be unobtainable and stubborn without being a "bad boy" and you can be a bad boy/brooding asshole without being attractive. Bad boys in real life are often constantly stoned, neglected people who do nothing with their lives. It's just that the media usually mixes those two things together.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 11:19 AM
0

No I don't. And no I wouldn't want to associate with a guy who slaps me because I annoyed him.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 06:46 AM
0

Go watch the play or the movie.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 05:55 AM
0

Ever seen A Streetcar Named Desire? It's a good one. The male love interest is a physically abusive man and the audience is made to see him in some interesting ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 05:27 AM
2

I love this question! I'm trying to think of something to contribute. So, nobody told me this when I was little, but maybe this is related: when I was in high school the guy I had a crush on would tease or neg me a lot (i.e. was "mean" to me), and eventually we ended up together for a little. Today I find myself being endeared towards guys who do the same, and I think my interactions with him definitely shaped my psychology a little in this way. I don't know how much this is true for most people…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 04:53 AM
1

There are honest people that have come here to debate. When you intend debate you should do so with an open mind, that you might be wrong sometimes, or the sub misses its purpose.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 02:02 AM
1

I'd just like to say that if a red pill hasn't learned anything at all from a blue pill in his/her time here he should question his motives for participating in this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 04:34 PM
11

this comment is completely opposite to my world perception... usually it's dudes who have similar tastes and girls who like many different types
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 04:03 PM
5

stop right there criminal scum
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 03:35 PM
1

probably unattracted. the important traits here for me are not having strong ambitions and being average looking (though ive been attracted to 5s before). not having either ambitions or above-average looks seems kinda meh, since i'm attracted to both. if he was average but ambitious or good looking but unambitious i'd probably be attracted. (and ofc if he was both) Stable, loyal, doesn't cheat or look at other girls yeh sounds good Is average in looks and fitness. By "average" i mean women would…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/16 12:31 PM
2

this is the kind of guy that if i was slutting around i might sleep with but not want to get in a relationship with details: Above average in looks and fitness. Works out regularly, has a sense of style. Is relatively popular among other women. yes Has a non-nerdy, masculine job. Owns his own business, travels a lot, manages a lot of people, or works in a physically demanding field. having a job is always a plus, i dont think nerdiness is a factor for me Has exciting hobbies such as rugby, rock …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/16 12:20 PM
1

yes please as long as i'm allowed to scratch the feathers out of a pillow every now and then...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 03:20 PM
2

pls adopt me
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 05:21 AM
8

This doc made me both angry and sympathetic. Pages and pages of women complaining they do the bulk of the work in a relationship without paying attention to the things men do that women (usually) don't. I won't go into details, most people here are already familiar with men's complaints about women in a relationship. But it made it hard for me to take these women seriously, although there is a lot of truth in what they're saying - being nurturing and soft and pleasant takes a lot of hard work fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 09:59 AM
5

if you look at my post history, i've never posted on that subreddit. i'm not subscribed to it. i identify as bp simply because i am opposed to rp.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 04:22 AM
2

there is only one category of blue pillers, we basically all think the same ps. this video is the incoherent rambles of a guy who apparently finds it incredibly difficult to get to the gist of what he is saying, to the backdrop of edgy music and a tree
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 04:13 AM
10

It has to feel terrible for men who think like you to go all these lengths to impress brainless inept females just for half an hour's worth of access to her vagina
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 07:26 AM
3

I would never assume that a man talking to me fancies me. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3x4nt4/how_should_women_react_when_a_man_likes_her_but/cy1rnbd I assume pretty much every man who talks to me is attracted to me ( not something I would ever admit in real life). I modify my behaviour as a result
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 11:15 AM
1

Am bi female, have a lot of male gay friends. There are gay people who like masculine gay people. There are gay people who like twinks. There are tops and bottoms. And yes, some of the gay people who like masculine gay people are also masculine themselves; analogical for twinks. It's a diverse world of preferences. This article is suuuper silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 08:52 AM
12

(modus ponens)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 11:21 PM
1

I don't agree with the idea that sexual strategy is amoral. I think there are some things that are not okay to do in relationships or in social contexts for the purpose of being laid/et cetera, especially if those things mean hurting other people through excessive dishonesty.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 08:23 PM
1

Sense of humor? Style of thinking? Shared hobbies? Talents?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 08:17 PM
3

Also I know alpha that are 6ft tall, 12 inch dick who got played Just wondering, how did you know how long their dick was?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/15 04:43 PM
15

Okay, so let me tell you a secret. Even when the girl thinks it is, it's usually not about the penis size. Some girls like big penises, yes, but if you carry yourself confidently in bed nobody is even going to look at that crap. When a girl pays attention to the size of your member it's because you don't manage to point her attention towards anything else about you (e.g. confidence, or a rockin body, or your sense of humor, or whatever). This is a bit personal but I've had a partner with a small…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/15 01:58 PM
25

I think you should break up with her. You're 24 years old, male, life ahead of you, you want sex. Your girlfriend is not attracted to you (no use sugarcoating it) and probably sees sex with you as a chore. You two are incompatible. Find a girl who is attracted to you. At the same time I would ask myself why your girlfriend isn't attracted to you. Focus on things you can fix. If you are not fit that might be the problem - girls like nice bodies. You might not be confident/creative enough in bed. …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/15 01:41 PM
1

OK then: It is a bad response to the comment, by your own admission. If you want to argue that 50% of women wouldn't be rejected, then that video doesn't talk about that. It talks about the experience of one attractive woman. What are you even talking about? I can't understand how you think I'm arguing "50% of women wouldn't be rejected" from what I said. Let me make it easy to understand for you. Your claim, and what I'm arguing against, is specifically that (*): The notion that >95% of men wou…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/15 07:46 AM
1

Well, fine, but you posted the video in response to the comment you are debating. That intimates that you at least did think that it spoke to that comment. Now you don't? It's in direct response to the comment? The notion that >95% of men would not instantly take an offer of sex from any member of the top 50% of women is a simulated fantasy inside the head of someone who for some reason believes (a) that attractive men are remotely as picky as any woman and (b) that the relative level of hornine…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/15 04:08 AM
3

getting sex as a (gorgeous) woman is not hard, i'm not claiming otherwise what i'm finding stupid is the idea that a woman can simply walk up to the vast majority of guys and straight up never be rejected for sex (let alone if she actually approached only guys she was actually attracted to) this is the significant difference between reality (gorgeous women can get sex easily) vs AbrasiveAsshole's fantasy (50% of women will never be rejected and can have sex with any man they desire) the idea tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/15 02:32 AM
4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBtF3I7fDfU 29 yes 70 no
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 01:01 PM
1

I'm not trying to get at anything? I'm just curious about the answers following an argument I had with someone (who would LTR this girl).
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/15 12:03 AM
3

Me neither but someone said it is to me
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/15 04:50 AM
1

I dont; just had a debate with someone about this
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/15 04:32 AM
2

Sounds like we'd get along great, seeing as I'm also a quattrosexual phyloromantic furry. babe.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/15 04:28 AM
3

Legal contract that she takes all your belongings if you break up before two months are passed after you've had sex last time
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/15 04:05 AM
3

Try and answer in the spirit of the question please. She won't sleep with you outside of an LTR
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/15 04:01 AM
7

either you have really low standards for what you call a 10/10 or you simply don't
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 04:22 AM
10

I only see blonde 10/10 women no you dont lol
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 04:19 AM
-2

Pretty much! Does this surprise you? To be more specific - I think if you already have interesting hobbies, you wear nice clothes, you smell good, and you go to the gym, then the only thing you need to work on is your self-confidence (incl., btw, your indifference to being rejected). Which means practicing actually talking to girls. I mean, why the fuck wouldn't girls want to date you/sleep with you at this point?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 10:34 PM
-1

Walk to a girl you see that you like. Say hi, you're cute, what's your name. She says so and so. Ask for her number. She gives it to you/doesn't. Rinse, repeat until you feel comfortable in your own skin. The only thing this takes is not being a pansy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 10:19 PM
-1

I'm a little doubtful whether those things have a significant enough impact on your dating success that the time spent mastering them wouldn't be better spent working on your hobbies, going to the gym or approaching girls. But who knows? I don't have the male dating perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 10:12 PM
1

I think the question you should be asking yourself is whether red pill advice works better than the barebones advice of being more assertive, having more self-respect, going to the gym and working on yourself, without that advice being coated in red pillisms.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 07:39 PM
3

I think the main difference is that women are socially expected to be weak and effeminate and men are expected to be strong and dependable. Men feel shame for being unmanly and women feel shame for not being girly. This makes women more comfortable in relationships where they are the weaker half, and submissiveness is one way to assert that. Being degraded is the same, it is a way for your partner to assert his position over you. It is also the more "naturally fitting" relationship dynamic due t…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 07:31 PM
1

this
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 04:47 AM
1

Source? I know of no one who has contended that human beings eliminate judgement from their thought processes, even partially. Even Zen masters don't claim to be free of judgement - they have learned to mitigate the effect judgement has on their thinking/actions, but that is not the same thing at all. I wasn't saying you can eliminate judgement from your thoughts, which is why I used the word "partially". You can be conscious of your judgements and their being (in your eyes) wrong and for a lot …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 12:19 PM
0

Judging is only partially reflexive and judgement can be changed through thinking about what you're judging more in depth. Anyway, we understand the term "sexual strategy" in a fundamentally different way and I don't care to debate which definition is correct. For me the word strategy includes how you act on your attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 09:48 PM
11

no
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 08:44 PM
2

Can you explain whats wrong with polygamy in your eyes more in detail?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 08:41 PM
0

So, just curious - since everyone judges everything (and everyone) all the time about everything as a central part of cognitive functioning, what sort of thing is it okay to judge women (or anyone else, for that matter) on? I ask as someone who generally doesn't actually action the judgements I might have on someone's n-count. It's not okay to shame people based on their sex lives them for sleeping with a lot of people. You are welcome to have your n-count preference when it comes to choosing a …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 08:29 PM
8

The pill analogy works like this. You live your life in the matrix until one day you are offered a red pill (which is some theory about human sexes). If you accept this red pill (agree with the concepts of this theory) then you are a red piller. If you disagree with one or more of the core concepts of this theory then you are a bluepiller. For example, I am a bluepiller because I don't agree that dread game is an okay thing to do in a relationship/marriage or that it's okay to judge women based …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/15 04:45 PM
6

Blue pillers are not feminists, they are just people who don't agree with one or more core concepts of TRP and don't identify as TRP or as something similar and equivalent to it. If you ask most people about TRP concepts you will find that while they agree with some things (douchebags get all the girls), most probably don't agree with stuff like AWALT and dread game or other distinct and contrarian TRP concepts. The people who fully embrace- or would completely agree had they known of TRP concep…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/15 04:32 PM
1

But what's so unappealing about 25-29 year olds
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 06:20 PM
3

Whats up with there being literally %0.0 men aged 25-29 getting laid 4 times a week and then suddenly it goes to %5.5 at 30-39 year old lol
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 01:44 AM
2

it said "many women like rough/dominant sex" which is true
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/15 05:20 PM
7

sometimes i fantasize about getting into an LTR just for the high cheating will give me no, of course cheating doesn't make me wet dude. what kind of answer did you expect to hear? also that story is fake as fuckkk
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/15 10:14 AM
2

ok cool :)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/15 03:56 AM
2

I dunno, I think that at some point you really gotta be a leader, not a follower (hee). It's not a bad thing for the sub management to assertively impose some of its own views on content style/etc on the sub. If not endorsed contributors, it will be less controversial to highlight high-effort/interesting posts in some weekly "recent ongoings" post.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/15 03:44 AM
1

Mostly because it's technical and time consuming. We have discussed it though. Would be a cool addition. I think you can get in touch with the mods of /r/cmv and theyll be happy to help you set it up. there are several subs I go to that already have something like this set up and it doesnt seem as difficult as it sounds We constantly get accused of bias. The community can vote on it in a bi-weekly thread. Each user will be able to nominate another user in a top-level comment (explaining why they…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/15 03:32 AM
1

Can you read my reply to my comment about things that I feel could help the sub out & tell me what u think? Besides from the stricter bans/warnings suggestion I think most of those features are benevolent
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/15 03:24 AM
2

I realize "there is room for improvement" is vague so I will also write some concrete ideas. Why not introduce deltas that the OP of an AskB/RP or a CMV thread can award someone for a quality contribution? (like in /r/cmv) Why not have a bot that automatically responds to CMV or AskB/RP posts with guidelines and provides an "off-topic" section (like /r/writingprompts) People who circlejerk or blatantly disregard guidelines in a top-level comment should be warned and then given a ban, and this sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/15 03:19 AM
1

I actually don't think this is a weird gray judgement issue. The post of mine you linked should've been removed. I think I just didn't notice it was a CMV post, or maybe it's just the rotten mood I've been in today and I felt like shitposting, I don't remember. The fact it is the top-upvoted post in that thread (but with just 11 votes tbf) just shows that a lot of the community doesn't care for the CMV tag either. About the community: I agree with you. I think the problem is in large part with t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/15 03:04 AM
3

I see it all the time and its the advice I give myself to my guy friends tbh but just to make a distinction here, not being given often enough doesnt mean it's not politically correct
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/15 11:10 PM
18

it's not particularly PC: lift, be assertive, many women like rough/dominant sex, focus on yourself and don't put women on a pedestal. This really is totally PC advice and there's no reason bluepillers shouldn't take it as well (which a lot of them do) The non-PC advice is stuff like dread game, treating women like children, etc
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/15 10:51 PM
10

What is the question?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/15 09:32 PM
11

blue pill is just a word for someone who doesn't identify as RP and disagrees with one or more core principles of TRP. it's not the same as feminism and not the same as saying men and women are not different
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/15 09:18 PM
8

i would hope it's possible to be attracted to women without being attracted to children
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/15 08:32 PM
5

why
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/15 01:08 AM
1

for me it is more about what situations I can imagine myself with a guy than his raw hot-or-notness. so, if a not-so-hot guy wears something or says something that really clicks for me sexually and gets my mind going (like, i can see him specifically doing it), that can get me really turned on for him. likewise if a guy is hot but has a personality of a brick he wont do anything for me
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 11:54 PM
5

not really something I consciously think of unless I meet someone really attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 01:00 AM
1

let me call you out on something first. women dont go into relationships for emotional support (sounds like some sort of therapy), we want to be with a guy that we are intensely attracted to and who makes us feel amazing. this is just as sexual for us as physical sex is for guys. anyway, if we are saying that the expiration date is the reason a highly attractive man has it better than a highly attractive woman i can accept that reasoning
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 10:29 PM
6

put your balls back in your pants sandman
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 10:08 PM
-1

ok so that guy sounds like he is having a good time but other than having a longer "expiration date" than girls isn't he just doing stuff TRP says most average girls can do if they wanted to?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 10:00 PM
2

can you give an example of a man (non-celebrity) who has it better than women who are similarly attractive in the SMP?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 05:13 PM
2

Best men > Best women why?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 04:57 PM
1

yea it's pretty stupid to invest in a volatile alpha hedge fund unless you really know what youre doing and even then the handling fees usually make it not worth
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/15 03:26 PM
5

the IRCC
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/15 03:23 PM
1

no, you lose information then (that power is about sex).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/15 12:20 AM
2

more like hes not wearing the kind of makeup that would be attractive to women
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 12:47 PM
1

yea i wasn't serious :) http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/10/29/chinese-man-divorces-ugly-wife_n_2037141.html
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 12:38 PM
1

after stalking my friend who goes to the gym 3 times a week and systematically tortures himself 1 1/2 hours each time im glad all i have to do is put on some eyeliner tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 12:36 PM
1

dont want no gorgeous post-plastic woman tricking you into having uggo babies
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 12:31 PM
1

i think you are overestimating how rare it is to have a nice figure (not just a not-overweight one), nice skin, and gorgeous hair (even if you dont care for redheads) like rose leslie does. this is the stuff most women her age cover up with cakey makeup and weird facebook angles. and she has gorgeous eyes and a pretty face to boot. besides from being skinny i have nowhere near any of those things (not too hard to find out what i look like with some stalking) and as far as i know im usually consi…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 12:14 PM
3

i think it is super weird to put her as average (shouldnt she already be above average just for being young, fit and with nice skin?) but youre welcome to your own tastes :p i think she is real attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 04:12 AM
2

if ygritte is average i must be a bridge troll by redhead standards
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 03:43 AM
2

Yea I mean I think you are right that if a 35 year old man could take a potion that would make him 25 year old he would have more success, its just that from what Ive seen/heard a lot of men dont seem to know what they are looking for in that age, they are more shy and less likely to live out their dating potential But I do agree that (even for girls like me) being 30, 40 years old doesnt automatically make a man more attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 10:54 PM
1

Ok so I think it's like this - I don't have any evidence to back it up, its just my experience: most women prefer men just slightly older than them (maybe 3-5 years). Then there are plenty of women who will be ok with dating a man 5-10 years older than them. And there is a not small number of women who actually like older men better, but they are not the majority. The thing is, there is a big enough number of women that don't mind older men that even if they are not a majority, older men will st…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 10:48 PM
2

just wondering, do you still think the type of girls in your high school that you had crushes on would be your type today?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 10:40 PM
1

1) I dont think older men are more physically attractive, it is a combination of other things (more comfortable in their shoes, wisdom, an interesting career, more relationship experience, etc) 2) Not most women, just not an insignificant number
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 10:38 PM
12

Im asking what type deck you run bitch
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 10:01 PM
2

Im not repulsed by table top games
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 09:57 PM
12

Honestly I would only drop him if he has a blue control deck, because when I played with my ex I remember always losing to those and I think Im post traumatic
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 09:55 PM
2

I don't think those ask for more intelligence
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 09:43 PM
6

because 15 year old high school girls are a good reflection of the dating preferences of women 10 years older than them also I would totally have asked the chess club captain of my school for a date so
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 09:29 PM
1

Sleeping with other people is ok, but must ask permission from partner. No explicit permission = cheating. (Im actually okay if its just the man sleeping with other people. I am kind of into that.) Its over once we cant be completely honest with each other about our relationship. Man is dominant. Both have our own careers and kinda do our own thing. Woman doesnt cook because she has no culinary talent whatsoever (cries). Eventually living together legally married with kids. Spend lots of time to…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 09:20 PM
2

So here's a data point I guess? I'm a member of this sub, mostly blue pill, and I like older men (like 10-15 years older). So do a lot of my girlfriends. I don't think it's fair to say we are a minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 09:00 PM
10

I don't think it takes a lot of intelligence to play pokemon or be an expert in Star Wars so I don't think this would impress me very much (but if he likes some obscure fandom I also like that's nice for totally different reasons)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 08:20 PM
3

As far as dateability goes it's more important for the guy to be as or more intelligent than you than to be intelligent But I'm attracted to intelligent men for their intellect sure yes. Not just artsy sociable types either.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 08:08 PM
5

If you can get an "iron prenup" that holds up in court and throw the girl you divorce to the streets, good for you. It's not something you should realistically expect. the prevention of frustrations has a lower priority than happiness. This is obviously a question of degree. Would you bet your house, career and life's savings for a 50% chance at doubling your success? How many times would you repeat that bet? Comfort is important. Also your analogy about the single mom is really, really silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/15 05:28 PM
3

I'll explain the subtle contradiction in your way of thinking. Never said that. By "never said that" I'm going to assume you mean that TRP does have advice for men who want to raise a family too. This advice, we might agree, can be summarized like so: If you have to marry, marry sexually inexperienced women with submissive tendencies who are non-career focused because they make better partners. During marriage, encourage women to do become good wives and mothers rather than seek financial indepe…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/15 01:49 PM
5

In my opinion a modern version of this is not really something you can practically uphold. I mean I definitely would never do this to someone, but if a woman wants to she could just unenthusiastically sleep with her husband once a month to check the "healthy sexual life" box and then her husband wouldn't have good cause in the eyes of the law to divorce her, so she gets the support anyway. Or alternatively husbands will just try to trip their wives into doing something that gives them justificat…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/15 12:51 PM
4

So in your opinion, is TRP not applicable to men who want to raise a family? IMO backwards thinking, you don't need a marriage to raise kids. Sounds like a justification of those people. I don't think you can reliably bet on the possibility of finding a girl who is fit to raise children (by TRP standards) and who would agree to raise kids with you without marriage. I mean congrats if you find one, but that's not a reasonable possibility to bet on.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/15 12:42 PM
9

I'm a little surprised to see this coming from someone who's supposed to be knowledgeable about TRP? There are plenty of TRP men who are interested in getting marriage advice or in getting married in order to raise a family. A lot of the advice in the TRP sphere is catered to these men: see r/TRPparenting, top comment in threads like this, and the billion "marriage guides" on TRP. TRP defines itself as a sexual strategy guide whose audience is the majority of young westernized men. It warns agai…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/15 11:15 AM
4

Not everything we do is for the purpose of getting superficial male attention
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/15 05:51 PM
1

I dont agree that rejection of rape leads to rape. I said if. Because even if it did, saying "no" is better than saying yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/15 12:00 PM
1

Umm what? If rejection of initiation leads to rape then youll get raped anyway so I dont see why you wouldnt say no. And seriously, the solution to some people of the male gender being rapists isnt to treat all men like rapists just in case. Thats sexist as fuck. Your solution to this problem is really twisted. Its basically saying that as long as I retrospectively consider something to be rape, even if I went to his apartment out of my own free will, even if I said yes at the time, it should st…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 08:58 PM
2

Sex has an initiator, just like tea-drinking: someone makes the tea. Drunk people who initiate sex without regard for the consent of their sex partner (drunk or sober) is a rapist. Just like stealing while drunk still makes you a thief. If someone is sober and wishes to initiate sex, they should be aware that a drunk person cannot consent to it. I dont agree with this. It just puts the blame on men because theyre the ones who almost always initiate. If me and a guy are both drunk and he tries to…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 09:09 AM
5

But I didnt say looks dont matter at all. I said Im not really picky. There's still visual stuff that turns me off (yellow teeth, if a guy doesnt smell nice, if hes very thin or obese, glaring physical deformities, etc). But after you pass those basic standards what matters most is confidence and personality. And obviously I like good looking guys. If there was two guys who had equally awesome personalities Id choose the more handsome/muscular/taller guy I admit. But this is only when everything…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 07:48 PM
5

I dont see why its dead wrong or why confidence and personality is somehow exclusive to the domain of PUA/TRP? Im saying what Im attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 06:14 PM
4

Um, I don't know how you could check this sort of thing? Me and most of my girlfriends aren't really picky about looks. I know a few women who definitely care about their guy being tall and going to the gym and stuff. I think those things are nice but personally I think confidence and personality matters more I dont think I ever paid a lot of attention to looks (and Im not bad looking myself if someone wants to jump to that conclusion)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 05:17 PM
5

Thank you for the welcome!! :) I agree both types of intelligence need to be cultivated. But I think women's emotionality is not the same as a child's emotionality because it is more introspective, and she uses it to have a greater understanding of other people's emotion as well..
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/15 07:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter