TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bobandgeorge Archive

View 1 posts and 433 comments by bobandgeorge on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Why is this even here?
/r/MensRights24/03/13 06:19 AM
-2

I'll say it then. This doesn't belong here.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 06:18 AM
8

It's not "us" vs them.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 06:17 AM
1

No-one likes admitting they do things for attention I dunno. Have you heard of this website called Reddit? A lot of it's users aren't even shameful about it.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 05:40 AM
7

If you don't wish death upon someone, don't say it. It makes the rest of us look bad.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 12:42 AM
2

Dildos.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 01:36 AM
4

There's maybe ten or twelve original comments added to Reddit on a daily basis, tops.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 12:55 AM
1

Sounds like a plan. I'm buying. You can give just the tip.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 06:06 PM
1

A draw? Lets discuss the terms over lunch. How about some sammiches?
/r/MensRights15/03/13 05:52 PM
2

Well maybe you can help me out with this, because involuntary deviate sexual intercourse with a child sounds exactly like rape according to Pennsylvania law. http://www.pameganslaw.state.pa.us/CrimeCode.aspx
/r/MensRights15/03/13 05:47 PM
1

Better? http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=news/local&id=9002228
/r/MensRights15/03/13 06:38 AM
6

As in the boys actions were involuntary. Not hers.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 06:37 AM
8

Well, yeah. These kids released all of this info without any outside influence to the entire world by their own choice. By their own choice. This isn't a case of an alleged victim naming a person or a group of people and the press picking it up. If it was I'd be right there with you, brother. This is a case of an alleged rapist telling absolutely everyone that has a connection to the internet, "Yep, I did it."
/r/MensRights15/03/13 04:49 AM
1

What facts are you missing?
/r/MensRights15/03/13 04:05 AM
14

The video has been made publicly available. The tweets they posted were originally public as well before they were deleted. I absolutely understand and agree with the fact that names should be kept hidden by the press... but, I mean, all of that info was available to the public before the press picked this story up.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 04:03 AM
4

You posted this 7 hours ago, but just in case you haven't seen it yet, it's a pretty tough thing to watch, dude. You have been warned.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 03:55 AM
2

That's not sexism. That's being a brat. You don't have to have a vagina to be a brat. Edit: And Swiss instead of Provologne is a perfectly legitimate reason to throw that sandwich on the ground. I mean god damn, there wasn't even any havarti in the fridge?
/r/MensRights15/03/13 02:23 AM
2

And just how has this mans rights been infringed upon?
/r/MensRights13/03/13 04:17 PM
2

Sweet and spicy and tangy. It's hard to describe, man. You gotta try it for yourself. It works best with cocktail weenies but you can put it in a squeeze bottle and put it on dogs too. Equal parts mustard and jelly into a pot, add weenies, stir. Let simmer for 1 hour. Enjoy!
/r/MensRights25/02/13 06:02 AM
2

Why do you care what anyone else thinks about what you eat? I mix mustard and grape jelly together and put it on my hot dogs. No body cares. If you think salad isn't manly enough... Eat it with your fucking hands!
/r/MensRights25/02/13 04:22 AM
2

Why would you do that?
/r/MensRights24/02/13 05:36 PM
3

Well, yeah. Although, there is always the off chance she's from the island of Themyscira.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:54 AM
11

A man had to fuck you to get you pregnant I understand that this was the first thing you thought of when reading this so I won't fault you for that, but I'm sure you are aware of the advancements of modern science. After reading through some of the other comments on here, it seems like there never was a man in the picture and she went through in vitro fertilization. SCIENCE! Makin babies without bumpin uglies!
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:31 AM
5

That's what I'm saying. Sure, my parents got what they thought I would like for birthdays and holidays and such, but if they said we were going to the toy store I was getting what I wanted to play with (reasonably priced, of course). No, the tea set and tutu didn't magically fall into this boys lap, but is it really that hard to believe that just maybe the kid wanted those toys? OP's comment sure sounds like it's coming from a place of hatred. I mean, come on, who doesn't like tea? Men have lite…
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:23 AM
2

Sure it does.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 11:56 PM
3

but what child actually considers the idea of putting it in their mouth? Sup? I can't exactly tell you why it happened because it was over 20 years ago and I was still a small child, but it happened to me and the neighbor girl in the woods behind her house. There was absolutely no abuse in my home and I'm fairly certain there wasn't in hers either. It was completely innocent and mutual. Sometimes we just explore as kids.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 11:34 PM
1

Am I? Yes What else do you think circumcision teaches? I don't think it teaches anything. do you think an infant is incapable of learning? I never said that. In fact, I specifically said newborn. Do you know when the majority of circumcisions take place? It's not when they're infants. If you think a newborn that is less than a few months old is capable of learning, understanding, or remembering anything you're not worth talking to about this.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 11:18 AM
1

I'm pretty sure that's not the first lesson any newborn learns, regardless. You're exaggerating.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 04:58 AM
2

Are we the apples or the pears.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 10:18 PM
1

So what you're saying is that pain on your junk feels worse for you than it does for me. There's a reason why the crazy religious nutter John Kellogg (of CornFlake fame) advocated circumcision to help stop masturbation. Oh yeah? My that's interesting! How'd that work out in helping to stop masturbation, by the way?
/r/MensRights27/01/13 07:19 PM
1

Biology tells me how your orgasm feels. No it doesn't. Pleasure works in a similar way to pain in that it is different from person to person. That's why when a doctor asks you how much something hurts, they ask you to describe it on a 1-10 scale. A 10 for me might feel different to you. It might feel better or it might feel worse.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 06:45 PM
2

Good argument, just say the same thing like a robot on a loop. Well you missed it the first time, so... You say sex still feels good, sure it does, but how much better could it have felt if you weren't circumcised? How dare you tell me how my orgasm feels.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 06:31 PM
3

sex still feels awesome
/r/MensRights27/01/13 06:19 PM
6

Because it doesn't take away our ability to have sex and sex still feels awesome.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 05:59 PM
7

It's not a waste of time to receive a basic level of education.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 05:30 AM
5

OP's username is NiggerJew944. That should tell you exactly how factual this is.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 05:26 AM
0

I thought the acid attacks we're a Saudi/Pakistani thing.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 05:14 PM
3

As far as I know, nobody has even suggested that males should get taxpayer-funded birth control So? I'm pretty sure that the PPACA does cover condoms, even if nobody mentioned it.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 04:28 PM
2

A week later she posted this. I'm sure the vast majority didn't do this but to those of you that did, way to go. Pat yourselves on the back for that one...
/r/MensRights26/12/12 04:49 AM
2

Oh I don't doubt it. But that's probably the reason why it isn't on the front page of those two subreddits.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 06:13 PM
4

Well has anyone even submitted it there?
/r/MensRights24/12/12 03:49 PM
-17

Wait a tick. Why is Demi Moore the bad guy in this? Wasn't it Kutcher that cheated on her? Edit: So much for being more accepting of dissenting opinions than /r/Feminism
/r/MensRights23/12/12 06:41 PM
5

Yeah. That's what he was implying.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 06:53 AM
3

Whose rights are being infringed upon here?
/r/MensRights20/12/12 05:06 PM
0

There is also statistical evidence that women do suicide attempts for attention far more than men. Where?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:17 AM
2

Feminists? As in more than one? Can you find me more examples besides this extremist?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:09 AM
1

This has nothing to do with her gender. A single father could have done the same thing and there are plenty of single fathers that do the exact opposite and just as many (if not more) single mothers that do the same.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:04 AM
5

Single parenting is a fail, period. If this next quote ... She let her acknowledged mentally disturbed son get access to her guns. ... was your main point you would have had me. But this has nothing to do with single parenting and everything to do with shitty parenting and being an irresponsible gun owner.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 05:57 AM
0

The problem is that most of the news don't report on these cases. Bullshit. If you do a Google search for any of the names used in the article you'll find several results of news articles from sources that aren't the Daily Mail.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 11:32 AM
10

If it's actually factually happening, we can find a better source than the Daily Mail.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 11:28 AM
1

I believe he's suggesting you find a better example of a father that didn't agree to pay for his child's post-secondary education rather than one that did.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 06:51 AM
1

But he did agree to pay for it.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 06:50 AM
74

I like the men's day logo. Real business like. Super classy.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 02:19 AM
1

I'll say. Just wait till that kid is an adult. He may possess the Yeard of Legend.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 06:46 AM
2

No, it's because they can't come anywhere near this level of awesome. It's about quality, dude.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 06:43 AM
11

Jewish white male here. I was about to post that there's probably one or two time periods where I don't get that privilege. It's on the tip of my tongue though...
/r/MensRights15/11/12 01:25 AM
3

Keto?
/r/MensRights13/11/12 02:17 PM
0

Quantify "a child" exactly. No. This started from you disagreeing with the fact that sex to a 5 and 10 year old is not the same as it is to a 17 year old. You are clearly smart enough to know why this is wrong and you're just trying to argue semantics. It's petty and retarded. Stop it. So threatening violence is an acceptable way to deal with people who merely exhibit behaviors that you find unacceptable, but which do not impose unwanted costs, burdens, et cetera on anyone? I think I'll have to …
/r/MensRights06/11/12 07:34 PM
1

If there were no speed limits, and they drove at an unsafe speed because they could, that would make them unsafe drivers, wouldn't it?
/r/MensRights06/11/12 07:32 PM
-1

Correct.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 07:18 PM
-1

Not being on one of those lists I can't really tell you because I have no experience with them. But you're twisting the argument. I said Putting someone on a sex offender registry hardly seems violent at all. That is, name goes on list. I didn't say anything about enforcement.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 06:08 PM
0

Some do, yes.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 06:04 PM
1

Do people doubt the conviction of Christians who don't want to imprison, torture, or execute fornicators? Yes. Of course they do. We call those people fundamentalists. From a Christian point-of-view fornication is not "okay", and yet Christians who want to imprison, torture, or execute them are viewed as being "backwards" and they're encouraged to exercise "tolerance". Why does the same standard not apply here? Because two consenting adults fornicating is not the same as an adult taking advantag…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 06:03 PM
0

Did I say that?
/r/MensRights06/11/12 05:47 PM
0

Not all of them, no. But it's not the safe drivers I'm worried about.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 03:53 PM
2

Literally every day there are people obeying speed limits.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 03:44 PM
-1

Putting someone on a sex offender registry hardly seems violent at all. I guess you could really work that pen though.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 03:42 PM
2

Well I'll give this one a shot. Given this, can you explain why selling a used car to someone who is unaware of every facet of car maintenance (since car maintenance is "involved in" car ownership) is not statutory rape? Are... are you serious right now? Do I need to explain to you what rape means? This is just retarded. Moreover, can you explain why the onus of establishing someone's ability to consent lies not on the person actually giving consent, but on the person receiving that consent? Bec…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 03:40 PM
1

YOU'RE A LOOSE CANNON BOBROVSKY!
/r/MensRights06/11/12 08:55 AM
1

Why post something antagonistic and violent when you don't mean it? Even though this is a more serious forum, you do realize we're still on Reddit, right?
/r/MensRights06/11/12 07:24 AM
2

Oh my stars and garters!
/r/MensRights06/11/12 07:23 AM
3

Asserting something does not make it true. Facts do though. A 10 year old does not have a concept of what sex is outside of maybe pee-pee in Virginia. Can you honestly tell me you or anyone else you've met knew exactly what sex is and everything that is involved with it at 10 years old?
/r/MensRights06/11/12 07:19 AM
0

If you're a man at a bar and a woman goes up to you and says "let's fuck," you can leave right then and there. Try doing that with a woman. You'll get the exact opposite result. Pfft, maybe you'll get the exact opposite results. Edit: sent to my inbox from atrixe. HAHAHA RIGHT DUMB FAG LOL!
/r/MensRights04/11/12 08:15 PM
4

Or, hey, maybe a child's father is dead for one reason or another and this is a program to give them a strong male role model
/r/MensRights01/11/12 04:29 PM
1

Running an emu farm without a license would fall under "public-order" actually. I suspect that "other" includes juvenile offenses and other non-specified stuff. That being said, I just did more research into this and it turns out all of those numbers are bullshit. It's a lot closer to 22% There's also this PDF put out by the BJS if you're interested. I'll be honest and say that I got that previous information here.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 05:46 AM
2

Why are they entitled to anybody's money and/or work? Well they did pay into it too. Most people on welfare have had a job before and even if they didn't, last time I checked welfare lasts about five years.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 04:03 AM
-4

While that is true (and I don't agree with it that much either), do you know how much of the prison population is made up of non-violent offenders? The 2009 federal prison population consisted of: Drugs 50.7% Public-order 35.0%, Violent 7.9% Property 5.8% Other .7% And that's not even taking into account state and county prisons which are populated by even more non-violent offenders. 50% of the prisoners in jail are there for drug related charges. But if we stopped making drugs illegal, sold the…
/r/MensRights23/10/12 03:59 AM
1

"Ask a stupid question" is all I'm getting at here.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:52 PM
2

No one has said that though.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:50 PM
2

Well isn't it their fault? No one is forcing anyone to choose one career path. As opposed to asking why society chooses to reward helper professions so much less. But that has nothing to do with why one person would choose to go into that sort of career.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:44 PM
1

Good PR.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:23 PM
-5

What is the difference between taking two years off to raise a child and taking two years off to go skydiving? Life?
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:22 PM
1

American withdrawn was in '73, not '53. But American entrance was as early as 1955. 1964 was when we first put troops on the ground. Still not sixty years. Okay. Sorry. Don't need to be a dick about it. Are you aware that we've had several conflicts and wars since then and haven't had a draft? 9/11 Was the worst attack on America and we still didn't have a draft. I'm not saying it can't happen. I'm saying that based on what's happened since then, it more than likely won't.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:42 AM
1

Sixty. Years ago.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 02:46 AM
-1

Pretty much. We've got one of the best and biggest military forces in the world. If they have to enforce the draft, you were going to going to fight anyway.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 05:36 PM
3

Cheap as shit on gas? Of course, that is until you need to get it repaired.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 04:42 AM
10

I thought it was a spike you hammer into the ground to keep a hot air balloon from floating away.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:16 PM
1

But, I mean, in the context of the movie it's the bad guy/girl that gets taken down. Where would James Bond or Die Hard be without violence?
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:06 AM
-5

So it would be okay if it was against a woman?
/r/MensRights25/09/12 01:45 AM
8

Try to find ten movies in which violence against men isn't depicted in one form or another. There's like 10 Air-Buds now, right?
/r/MensRights24/09/12 11:53 PM
2

I can't help but think that it's not all consensual. Let's see what happens if I type "chris brown" into the search bar on /r/beatingwomen. Yep. Second result is the picture of Rihanna.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 09:50 PM
2

And you can never know which they are unless measured. Quantum-intercourse.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 05:51 PM
1

there's always a bullshit counter No, they are not implying any of that.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 05:40 PM
7

This woman deleted my comments and made me unsubscribe from her channel because I said the Christmas song "Baby It's Cold Outside" wasn't about rape.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 02:47 PM
6

Are you Newt Gingrich?
/r/MensRights19/09/12 01:25 AM
10

Gary Johnson 2012!
/r/MensRights18/09/12 01:17 AM
-4

As for abortions, there is legitimate non-religious reasons for that. No there's not. Maybe for some people, but this is practically a staple of the religious rights talking point. thats government telling women what to do with their bodies. No. It's government telling women what they can do with their bodies. The government isn't going to force women to take birth control. Somehow they cant afford $10/month for birth control but they can afford over $100/month for Obamacare. Well, considering t…
/r/MensRights08/09/12 05:14 PM
2

Constructive conversation unless you go against the hivemind.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 02:17 PM
2

That child could have grown up and got a job to contribute. Can't now though. Or something like that.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 09:02 PM
2

That's a thing? We can do that now? Cause I gotta say, these clothes are kind of a pain in this muggy air.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 06:00 AM
3

No they didn't.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 01:47 PM
1

We don't talk about that.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:54 AM
2

A Geico commercial. The caveman gets offended every time he hears "So easy a caveman can do it"
/r/MensRights22/08/12 04:26 AM
53

Unga chunga.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 11:03 PM
4

Unless its TLC being douchey Period. Stop right there. It's TLC being douchey. It's "reality" tv. You think the cast members of Jersey Shore are getting drunk and partying every minute on the set? No. They play up those aspects because it's what sells. The same thing happens on T&T. They edit footage and add goofy music to make everything look more dramatic than it really is.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 08:17 AM
1

It provides nothing for the kids, only bragging rights for mothers. Hold on a second, big fella. I happen to know a mother that puts her daughter in pageants similar to these. Her mom absolutely hates it. The only reason she does it is because her kid loves it so much. She adores it. Makes her feel like a princess or something. She gets to spend time with other little princesses and make friends. I think T&T is just as shitty as the next person, but don't forget that it's "reality" tv. It's not …
/r/MensRights21/08/12 08:10 AM
1

I get what you're saying, it's just the way you're saying it sounds kind of rapey.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 03:30 AM
2

but did I imply this somewhere? Well there is I mean by the 5th time you'd have sex with a person it's pretty much a universal understanding that you have consent.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 07:39 PM
0

I don't see anything wrong with that statement. Of course, it's my prerogative to leave.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 12:29 AM
1

10 ellipses. Wow! Someone's serious.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 09:09 PM
2

And you're just oozing with maturity calling me a retard. Bravo.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 07:35 PM
-6

It is. As soon as you register to vote you register with selective service. I got my draft card the same day as my voter registration card.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 11:58 AM
3

What does he win, George?
/r/MensRights18/08/12 08:37 AM
5

Do you think humanity tastes good? Maybe those cannibals were on to something...
/r/MensRights13/08/12 06:18 PM
16

I know, right?! Did you see this one? And to make things worse, he’s drinking milk, a “drink” that requires the forceful molestation of innocent cows. In more than one way, this individual is contributing to rape culture
/r/MensRights08/08/12 04:10 PM
-3

Actually you need all of those.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 06:12 PM
10

You're opening a world of hurt.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 05:56 AM
4

A uterus is nothing at all like an apartment building. For one, I can't fit a couch in most.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 10:38 PM
1

They're Scottish.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 06:26 PM
1

I am not.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 06:13 PM
0

Scotland is it's own country. We don't call people from Mexico or Canada Americans just because they live on the North American continent.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 04:18 PM
4

No. They're Scottish.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 02:01 AM
3

You've got a money suit too?!
/r/MensRights04/08/12 11:11 PM
2

"don't drink to oblivion in public" If several nights of heavy drinking has taught me anything, it's don't drink to oblivion around people. Oh mornings with dicks drawn on my forehead... How I will miss thee.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 11:08 PM
10

http://www.keprtv.com/news/local/She-Cant-help-wanting-these-hot-young-boys-164681916.html Seriously though, stop using Daily Mail as a source, guys. If you find an article on it, just Google the name and use any other source.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 09:25 PM
4

Working pretty hard on that gay marriage thing.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 08:46 PM
3

I see you've never played knifey-spoony before.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 07:33 PM
10

I'm not going to defend what the guy did. I'm not going to say what he did was right. I'm not going to say that you weren't raped or you don't have a reason to be traumatized. I'm going to respond to what you said in this comment based on what is actually known. the fact is that he would have tried to stop me. You don't know that. he was a forceful person and would have used force. You don't know that. he would not have really let me leave even though he verbalized "options" for me. You don't kn…
/r/MensRights29/07/12 10:08 AM
2

if a woman reports false rape in order to get attention and sympathy, she is probably fucked in the head in some way or another. You don't say!
/r/MensRights29/07/12 09:30 AM
12

It doesn't matter. God damn, dude. You can't really justify having a kid on your lap, putting him down, and then running for your life. You have to protect children at all costs. That's what a decent human being does. You pull them out of the road if a speeding car is headed toward them. You slap their hand away when they're trying to fit it in a light socket. And for God's sake, you can at least hold their hand to try to get them out of a situation like that. It's not about being a man, it's ab…
/r/MensRights28/07/12 01:54 AM
1

Ditching the girl? Alright. Sure, I'm not exactly comfortable doing it but I was raised on Spider-Man and Power Rangers. I feel compelled to help anyone when I can, regardless of gender, but if others don't feel like it then I can't really fault them for following their instincts. But kids? Man... Nope. I'm sorry. I can't do it. His kids or someone elses, I can't do it. You've got to help out children. It's like a natural instinct and is probably the main instinct that allowed us as a species to…
/r/MensRights28/07/12 01:49 AM
3

My thoughts exactly. Stop saying "imagine if the genders were reversed" and just do the same thing if the genders were reversed. Share the story with your friends. Get outraged that this happened, not at the fact that they were female.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 05:08 PM
2

But I didn't say retard :(
/r/MensRights18/07/12 05:31 PM
2

Sorry. I forgot people here don't take to jokes very well.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 04:54 PM
2

Would you like me to call you ugly?
/r/MensRights18/07/12 03:57 PM
2

Not that I want to downplay the seriousness of men's reproductive rights, but I think I would much rather have a kid than AIDS.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 07:28 PM
9

Yes, John. That was the joke.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 07:26 PM
1

most people believe that the average joe has that kind of mindset... So what you're saying is that most people believe that.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 10:43 PM
1

It's a joke.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 09:46 PM
2

I'm sure you've heard all of the arguments against your position so I'm not going to bother. We will have to agree to disagree.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 06:18 AM
5

Carlin did it years ago.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 04:11 AM
14

It's a good thing she went to jail then, don't you think?
/r/MensRights10/07/12 11:30 PM
7

Maybe I don't want to eat out a woman because she make have wiped the wrong way Well, I mean... Yeah? If that were the case who would want to?
/r/MensRights10/07/12 07:12 PM
1

Oh. Well, alright then. Carry on.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 07:02 PM
0

Or, and hear me out, neither party is responsible for the next 18 years or 9 months. Just like a man can't force a woman to carry to term if she does not want to, she shouldn't be able to force him to pay child support for a child he does not want.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 06:50 PM
2

I'm just not going to respond to this one anymore because we're just repeating ourselves. You think it's ethical for parenthood to be forced on someone and I think you're a loon. Let's just agree to disagree.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 04:10 PM
2

that does not mean that all women are deadbeats because a small percentage of them go to prison. I never said that. he agrees to accept all associated risks with such action. But she does not. She can opt out at any time. This is not equal. This is not 50/50. It's no different than me flying in a plane. No it's not. You're associating the risks of sex with flying a plane. But, and for the last time, sex =/= pregnancy. The decision to have sex is not the same as the decision to be a parent. If it…
/r/MensRights10/07/12 04:07 PM
4

marriage, at its essence, is a mating contract, No it's not. Plenty of people get married and do not have children. Marriage, at its essence, is a contract that says, "I agree to be with you and only you for the rest of our lives, so help me God/Vishnu/FSM/Whatever." there is absolutely no reason for any man ever to get married There is already absolutely no reason for any man ever to get married. Give me one reason why someone has to get married. his wife might randomly decide to have no kids, …
/r/MensRights10/07/12 03:46 PM
1

Yes. Of course I would.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 03:37 PM
4

That doesn't make sense, at all. Did you go to a 3rd tier university or something? Did you go to a university? The alternative to an abortion would be to carry a child to term. What part of that did you not understand? Exactly, and so is the male. He is not fully aware of the consequences until she makes the decisions. Meanwhile, she is fully aware of them ahead of time. Yes, actually, she is forced with a responsibility. For her own body. Like you said, when the two are not equal biologically, …
/r/MensRights10/07/12 08:46 AM
2

The mom is legally responsible for 50%... why does that make her a dead beat mom? Because in the situation I described earlier, if she's leave, or hell, if she goes to prison, she may still be legally responsible, but that doesn't mean she's going to be. Ergo, she would be a deadbeat mom. he leaves the woman with 100% of the responsibility; abort (responsibility to perform an action), or have the kid (responsibility to perform an action). Right. Because it's her choice regardless if he were to s…
/r/MensRights10/07/12 08:32 AM
3

No. You can't force a woman to carry a child to term if she does not want to. She has a right to her own body.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 08:12 AM
7

Well, you're the one who's completely afraid of the consequences. Yeah. A lot of men and women are. That's why they make birth control. You are the one that thinks because I made a decision to have sex I must have a child because of it. It's cute but immature logic. Sex =/= pregnancy. If she aborts, she has the burden of getting an abortion. Which is a helluva lot better than the alternative. If she keeps the kid, she has 100% financial responsibility, if you "opt out". Correct. It is her decisi…
/r/MensRights10/07/12 08:05 AM
4

Nope. The woman is responsible 50%, legally. Then she's a dead beat mom. That doesn't make the man any less than 100% responsible once the mom is out of the picture. The male makes the decision to have sex with the woman. And the woman makes the decision to have sex with the man. Up to this point, it's an equal decision. 50/50, right? The thing is, sex =/= pregnancy. The decision to have sex with someone does not correlate to the decision of to have a child or not. The two are not mutually exclu…
/r/MensRights10/07/12 07:47 AM
5

Just as much as it is for the man to not participate in the act of impregnating her. In a perfect world, vaginal penetrative sex is possible without the risk of pregnancy. But we don't live in a perfect world and I don't think of sex as something that is only done for the purpose of procreation. Shit happens sometimes. It's cute that you think I should have to abstain from all sex just to avoid this risk but, honestly, grow up. Men are indeed 50% responsible for all pregnancies. She's the one th…
/r/MensRights10/07/12 06:52 AM
1

It's a potential person. It's not a person yet.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 06:37 AM
4

Not the father's body. Not the father's choice. Opting out is perfectly fine, but you can't force a woman to be pregnant if she doesn't want to be.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 06:34 AM
6

but if a man could opt out, he would leave a woman with 100% of the responsibility. As it should be. It's her body. It's her choice. It's her responsibility to make a decision for her own body. I could never force a woman to take on any responsibility in a pregnancy. Not 100%. I can't force her to take on any. Not 50/50. Zero. Nada. Zilch.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 06:26 AM
6

What the fuck? No she shouldn't. It's her body, not her husbands or boyfriends or random guy. Look, I'm all about guys being able to opt out, but you can't sit there and tell me that it's right to force a woman to opt in. What the hell is wrong with you? Jesus. I think I'm going to be sick. Edit: Come on, you're being sarcastic, right?
/r/MensRights10/07/12 06:22 AM
5

If the woman opts out, the man is left with 0% of the burden Why should only her decision matter? there's no way for a woman to leave a man with 100% of the burden Sure there is. "Here's your kid. Bye!"
/r/MensRights10/07/12 06:12 AM
4

Is no one going to give this kid credit for writing the song? Sure, it's not fantastic, but it's at the very least better than "Friday"
/r/MensRights07/07/12 03:15 PM
-2

Really? Would you rather be raped or almost raped? Would you rather be murdered or almost murdered?
/r/MensRights07/07/12 03:01 PM
2

And the OP specifically said "males and females" which refers to sex.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 02:54 PM
13

You can have any form of genitals and be any gender Does that also apply to species? I can finally fulfill my dream of being a platypus.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 07:53 AM
4

It's not rape, but it's definitely attempted rape. You gotta be careful with the semantics of "attempted" anything. For instance, "They were attempting to rape me but I said, "no" and then they didn't."
/r/MensRights06/07/12 03:40 AM
6

The victim WAS female. No. She identifies as a woman, but she is a male. Gender =/= sex. Her sex is male, not female. I can identify as a Time Lord, but my lack of regeneration and a lack of a second heart means I am not a Time Lord. you're ridiculously anally retentive about biological semantics Or we're just calling a duck a duck.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 03:37 AM
4

I'm gonna have to call bullshit on this one too.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:12 PM
-1

Not my biscuits!
/r/MensRights30/06/12 09:48 PM
1

most college leftists are leftists because it benefits them Or everybody?
/r/MensRights25/06/12 10:14 PM
2

It's not... that expensive. Food stamps are all done electronically these days. The EBT cards (more likely the EBT system) are able to recognize certain things that don't count as food and certain things that are food, but also don't count. For example, you can't use an EBT card to buy beer or any other alcoholic beverage. Or, you can use the card to buy a sandwich at your grocers deli, but you can't get a hot sandwich because that's a "prepared meal" or something like that. All you do is includ…
/r/MensRights25/06/12 10:13 PM
8

That's what I'm saying. There's only an "m" and an "o." At best you've got "mo" or "om"
/r/MensRights23/06/12 06:50 PM
0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCKOI24k_UY
/r/MensRights23/06/12 01:58 PM
-1

Well there goes that. I still have hope that he gets tortured in several other ways.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 01:15 PM
-9

Exactly. I know prison rape isn't something to joke about and it really isn't something that the justice system should use to punish people with but... man. I'm sorry, guys. I have a really hard time thinking about anything but for this piece of shit. Edit: The chair would be too good for him.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 08:00 AM
-1

You know what they do to child molesters in prison?
/r/MensRights23/06/12 07:15 AM
-1

Is that what he said?
/r/MensRights23/06/12 05:42 AM
8

Whoa whoa whoa. These women aren't any better than I am at it.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 01:33 PM
1

Even if the rapist used a condom there'd be evidence, tearing, pubic hairs, saliva, etc. Not if you've got one of these.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 10:16 PM
1

That woman removed me as a subscriber to her Youtube channel. I didn't even know you could do that before her.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 02:06 AM
1

God damnit, Jody!
/r/MensRights18/06/12 12:57 AM
11

He said, "It's about a man..." Oh screw it
/r/MensRights18/06/12 12:55 AM
1

I happen to like Shatner.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 02:16 PM
1

So it's only funny if you think it's funny.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 01:50 PM
10

To be fair, he does talk about one particular father 364 days of the year.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 01:49 PM
4

You sit on one that isn't and you are fucked. Yeah guys. Did you know that you can get herpes from sitting on a toilet? /s
/r/MensRights14/06/12 03:15 PM
6

Actually they use a knife.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 07:29 AM
-9

We don't like that talk round here, boy!
/r/MensRights06/06/12 06:25 AM
1

Exactly. All the guys getting angry and feeling like this is the end of the world are blowing this way out of proportion. This is just pandering for votes.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 05:46 AM
1

Former Border's employee here. I think there was one guy that we kicked out of the children's section when I worked there. But he was a really weird guy. I would often catch him "reading" adult magazines.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 08:26 PM
-7

No. It's because the Daily Mail is tabloid trash and is about as truthful as The National Enquirer.
/r/MensRights03/06/12 04:53 PM
-5

Guys, stop getting your news from the Daily Mail.
/r/MensRights03/06/12 04:22 PM
6

16 states teach abstinence only sexual education. Within the states that do not, there are likely schools which also teach abstinence only. While 54% actually sounds fairly accurate, you can't really say that those that do not know about protection (or are taught that contraception will always fail) would "not mind" getting pregnant.
/r/MensRights03/06/12 07:34 AM
1

Like "Leisure Suit Larry"?
/r/MensRights02/06/12 05:57 AM
0

I honestly can't answer you. I don't own a smart phone and even if I did, I wouldn't waste time playing a game as shitty as this. If young girls happen to be entertained by this, they have far bigger problems than what the game "teaches" them.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 05:50 AM
1

Car jackings and murder happen all the time in the real world too.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 07:51 PM
1

men serve as stepping stones with an integrated ATM Which is also a fantasy.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 07:17 PM
1

Not if you don't suck. I'd wager that I could start with $2000 and get $100,000 by the end of the day. Even on a faceless internet game you can still see peoples tells.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 07:14 PM
1

Just log in. They give you $2000+ chips every day. You can buy them but I've never needed to.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 07:10 PM
1

Not Texas Hold'em. You can play that as long as you've got chips.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 07:03 PM
1

In other words, Grand Theft Auto is responsible for all car jackings and public shootings.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 07:02 PM
-5

This.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 02:56 PM
6

It would be better if you donated it anyway.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 09:37 AM
11

We hate feminism for a reason. That's great but this is /r/MensRights. Not r/FuckFeminism. We don't need every single thread to go into a circlejerk about how much it sucks. Edit: It's literally as bad as some feminists.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 09:36 AM
-10

Or it could be shit like this.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 09:32 AM
1

It is not easy to just not have sex. Oh you weak, weak man.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 11:51 PM
1

If you don't want kids and she does, little fun will be had when a period is late. Not if you abstain.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 11:49 PM
1

You'd think it would be but a few of these comments make it sound like otherwise.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 11:47 PM
1

She got him for (at least) 18 years, You are clearly not "smart". If he's smart he gave her a fake name, took her to a motel (or her place), and paid in cash. Now she doesn't know who he is, doesn't know where he lives, and has no paper trail that could lead to him. Come on, man. This is spy shit 101.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 11:40 PM
1

Two wrongs make a right to some of these guys.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 11:36 PM
3

Well if he's smart no one will find him.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 11:33 PM
2

Show me a beer marketed at men that says "for the times when your nagging wife just won't shut up..." Well it's not a beer commercial...
/r/MensRights29/05/12 10:42 PM
2

It's not for us that you should pull it down. No one here really cares. You should pull it down to protect your online identity as well as your friends.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 07:44 PM
2

Read it as is.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 03:56 PM
2

Balls proceed courage.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 03:11 PM
1

Well I certainly don't think you're a homosexual or a pedophile.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 12:09 AM
1

I could go for some more empowerment.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 02:03 AM
1

Yeah, it could be but it's probably what I think it is.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 02:03 AM
3

This is a thing? Holy crap!
/r/MensRights22/05/12 02:55 AM
1

How much experience have you had with prenups?
/r/MensRights20/05/12 09:39 PM
0

Yeah! Anyone that still does it should be forced to feed, clothe, board, and educate the boy for the next 18 years!
/r/MensRights20/05/12 04:24 PM
2

Well it's not "whatever they deem too much." Each state has its own case law, or common law, which defines what is unconscionable. So all you gotta do is Google it. Or, you know, ask the lawyer that's filing it out for you.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 04:16 PM
2

Such as?
/r/MensRights20/05/12 10:40 AM
-2

It's not really a tax break. In fact, filing jointly could make them pay more. Soooo... given that it's a gamble to get married in the first place and given that it's a gamble to file jointly... yes. Yes they do deserve it.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 10:36 AM
1

Arguably happily married couples.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 08:40 AM
3

Divorce rates are what, 50% right now? If it were a casino game that would have the best odds. Honestly, some of you guys are such cynics. Holla, "we want prenup" (we want prenup, yeah!) and don't worry about the rest.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 08:38 AM
4

Um, whats the advantage to that? Less jail time?
/r/MensRights20/05/12 05:20 AM
4

Tax benefits.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 05:18 AM
-2

This causes lubrication problems and problems with actually cumming. It does not. Do you want to have a fap off? Seriously, we can have a fap off right now! Right now! We'll see who has problems cumming.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 05:18 PM
1

My apologies then.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 05:52 PM
1

Boys in America don't play hockey apparently! Cause it's expensive, dude.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 07:25 PM
1

Place kicker, bro.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 07:23 PM
1

They really don't. Women athlete's train to be the absolute best they can be. Society has no effect of female athletes. Could society encourage more women to get into sports? Absolutely. But what is that going to do? They still won't be able to to overcome science.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 06:58 PM
1

[and men's soccer to a larger extent, the sports populace isn't interested.] Uhh... spit take. America doesn't care about soccer but the rest of the entire freaking world loves the shit out of soccer.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 06:52 PM
1

So I exaggerated some. My point still remains. The best of the best of women can't compete with the best of the best of men. You said earlier that "Removing gender barriers will only bring better competition for men, women(at all levels) and for spectators." This simply isn't true. Sure, women could compete with average male athletes, but no spectator wants to watch average athletes of any sport. They don't call it the "National Average Basketball Association" or the "National Average Football L…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 06:26 PM
1

There is no problem with the top 1% being male if that one percent got there through legitimate means. What about the top 90%?
/r/MensRights16/05/12 04:10 AM
1

Men aren't "inherently better" at sports Let's not kid ourselves, dude. Yes we are. I mean I'm not. I'm lazy. But overall men are better at sports. We jump higher, we run faster, and we hit harder. There is no comparison. It's science.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 04:06 AM
-2

I'll just say that I think of myself as a pretty rational Jew but the rest of you guys don't think so.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 02:41 AM
-4

I would answer you, but my opinion is not shared by the rest of MR and I like my karma too much. Edit: It would appear that just the mere suggestion of a dissenting opinion earns downvotes.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 02:32 AM
1

That depends on what you mean by "radical."
/r/MensRights15/05/12 02:08 AM
1

You got it. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 04:27 AM
2

Well it's good to see that you have such a handle on your emotions when partaking in internet arguments.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 02:37 AM
2

Out of context. Why are you getting so heated over this?
/r/MensRights14/05/12 02:12 AM
0

I do actually. Deadly force, as defined by the United States Armed Forces, is the force which a person uses, causing—or that a person knows, or should know, would create a substantial risk of causing—death or serious bodily harm. In almost all cases, "serious bodily harm" means a near death injury. So no, it is not considered deadly force unless the victim dies or comes near to death. Please don't attempt to correct me unless you know what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 01:34 AM
10

Because this was in New York which doesn't have a "Stand Your Ground" type law. Stand Your Ground is a defense a defendant can use if he kills someone and is on trial for murder. As you can see from the video, he didn't kill anyone. Pretty much all states allow for self defense without deadly force.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 06:39 PM
4

This has literally nothing to do with "Stand Your Ground" laws.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 06:20 PM
21

It's... hard to explain. They think we're a bunch of rapists or wife beaters when we really just want the same thing they want. Edit: ...the same thing they say they want
/r/MensRights11/05/12 03:32 AM
23

We'll go make our own country clubs! With black jack! And strippers!
/r/MensRights09/05/12 10:15 PM
-7

(and in the context it was extremely clear they meant rape) Can we not do this? The Simpsons is a family show and there's never been a mention of rape in any context in the 20+ years it's been on tv.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 06:38 PM
1

In the later seasons he just became a bumblefuck retard though But he still cares. He's one of the best TV dads ever.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 06:33 PM
2

Chest bump?
/r/MensRights02/05/12 07:27 PM
1

The website is but the commercial really implied the whole "deadbeat dad" stereotype. The narrator was a women, the only people on camera were women (one of them looked like she was missing a tooth or two), and the whole tone of it felt anti-male. Man I wish I could find a video of it.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 06:47 AM
1

Common knowledge like the wage gap? There IS a wage gap between men and women though. It's just got nothing to do with gender and everything to do with personal choices. I am going to need a source in order to believe you. Jesus... Fine! http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Contemporary_Pedophilic_Islamic_Marriages Your points about killing your wife are just feminist sensationalism. Really it's more atheist sensationalism.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 08:45 PM
1

No. I kind of figured it was sort of common knowledge that women are sold into marriage by their fathers. Husbands don't sell their wives over there. They just kill em. Or throw acid in their face.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 08:06 PM
2

because if you actually owned someone you could force them to work for you or sell them I've got some bad news for you, man.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 08:55 PM
1

I don't... what?
/r/MensRights29/04/12 08:22 PM
1

Are you serious? You don't know anything about women in the Middle East? In several countries they're treated like property by their fathers and then later their husbands.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 08:06 PM
5

Should I point you to some middle eastern countries that disagree?
/r/MensRights28/04/12 11:57 PM
1

Well, maybe once or twice. Three times. Tops!
/r/MensRights28/04/12 11:56 PM
9

I can see you've never woken up in Tijuana in a bathtub of ice with one less kidney. Good times.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 05:43 PM
2

Lawyer up. Delete Facebook. Hit the gym.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 08:31 PM
6

Finally.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 06:27 AM
1

Besides the one use of "bizarre," it doesn't really seem to be biased against Deion. Anyone reading the article can see that she doesn't even say she didn't do it, just that she wants a fair shake.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 01:12 AM
8

I'll do it for $40!
/r/MensRights25/04/12 01:10 AM
1

I mentioned all of those things so you could understand that he has an image to protect.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 11:51 PM
2

what happens if it turns out he is playing the victim and there was no real domestic violence? Let's just put this into a little bit of perspective. Rated #34 NFL player of all-time by NFL.com 8× Pro Bowl selection 2× Super Bowl champion 2× NFC Defensive Player of the Year (1993, 1994) 2011 Pro Football Hall of Fame Inductee Now, I'm not saying he wouldn't play the victim... but think about the backlash to his career and his entire image if he did. Do you really think he's that dumb?
/r/MensRights24/04/12 04:25 PM
18

Here you go pal
/r/MensRights24/04/12 06:46 AM
20

Totally. The better place would be in the media. Where they can put their own spin on it and demonize him.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 06:45 AM
-3

Nice attempt to frame it as a matter of "my belief", as though it is up for debate or interpretation. You're right. I didn't say that so it is not up for you to interpret it that way. As I said above, in many cases the poster explicitly says just that in their own post. Which I didn't... Are we on the same page now?
/r/MensRights23/04/12 08:53 PM
-4

If that's what you want to believe, you are more than welcome to.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 08:46 PM
-4

Don't you think it's a bit stupid to believe I was implying that?
/r/MensRights23/04/12 08:23 PM
-8

Non-practicing, former believing Jew here. I'm circumcised. It's really not that bad.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 07:22 PM
3

Throwing my upvote at you for truth. With the exception of penile subincision, castration, or just chopping it off, FGM is fucking horrifying. Jesus do I get the creeps thinking about what some people do down there to women. You honestly might as well take a paddle bit and a power drill to it.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 07:17 PM
2

Ha ha!
/r/MensRights22/04/12 05:55 PM
1

Oooooh. Well I feel stupid now.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 05:09 PM
3

No relation.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 09:26 AM
4

Can't tell if serious...
/r/MensRights22/04/12 06:30 AM
2

Alternatively, there are people that have callouses. They are very sensitive about their thick skin.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 06:24 AM
40

Because some people like to answer their phones in movie theaters.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 05:48 AM
18

Yeah really. I don't pick fights with guys that could clearly kick my ass. If I get into a fight with any guy I'm going to make sure he's smaller, weaker, and possibly a hemophiliac.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 04:36 AM
0

The rest of MR that read it didn't think so.
/r/MensRights21/04/12 08:24 AM
3

We can't have jokes here, guys! Srsbznz
/r/MensRights21/04/12 08:09 AM
-1

When women learn that single motherhood by choice usually means deep poverty they'll quit doing it. Oh you. You're giving them far too much credit.
/r/MensRights21/04/12 04:18 AM
1

Oh no. I think masochism is perfectly normal and even natural. I don't think Thenewfoundlanders has any business saying what is and what is not a "normal" sexual fantasy.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 04:23 PM
1

But then the state realized they could make some money off of it, In Florida the lotto gives an average of $1 billion to education in public schools and college scholarships. And it's not like gambling can't be made legal again if it gets put on the ballot.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 07:14 AM
2

That implies that masochism is normal. But you know what Freud said, "The only abnormal sex is no sex at all."
/r/MensRights20/04/12 07:07 AM
2

It's not even that good of a slap.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 06:57 AM
2

That's what divorce is for. France doesn't have no-fault divorce. He was blocking the divorce, and she had to sue to get around an archaic law. The Judge's view is based on an idealised romantic view of marriage. What? No it's not. If I'm not getting enough sex just because she doesn't want to, I'm leaving. I am not getting what I expected out of our relationship. That's not romanticism. That's common sense. The court has no place ruling that a partner should exchange money for not having sex wi…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 02:54 PM
-2

What i don't support is after she got divorced she went back and sued him for money, that is... very insane. I dunno. If I thought for even a second that I could sue a woman for that in divorce proceedings, I'd probably go through with it. Gotta make up for lost time, after all, and I'm gonna need some way to get back on my dating feet. Or I could flash the Benjamin's which might help too.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 08:45 AM
-4

If it was a man sueing a woman for the same thing, no one would have taken him seriously. Maybe not for the same thing. But it does happen for other stuff. Plus I am almost positive I've heard this story before but in reverse. Any and all marriages must involve sex all the time despite any extraneous factors, including the will of the couple involved. He never said all the time. But he is right. Marriage implies sex. You'd really stay with someone if she wasn't giving you the goods anymore? And …
/r/MensRights19/04/12 08:40 AM
-1

claiming that everyone is racist There you go again :D
/r/MensRights18/04/12 10:29 PM
-1

You are making accusations, with no proof. http://www.nyclu.org/issues/racial-justice/stop-and-frisk-practices Exactly what did you mean if you weren't insinuating that cops are racist in "many cases" then? Oh no. I was most certainly insinuating that cops are racist. I just wasn't insinuating that they are only racist towards black people or that they are all white. Hence the bold. That's all you putting words in places they don't belong.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 09:50 PM
0

You asked "who cares if he's black?" and I told you. Don't ask stupid questions. Insinuating that the police are racist only towards black people (because they are all white) is moronic. Yeah... See, I never said that and I didn't insinuate anything. I can't even begin to imagine where you pulled that idea from.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 09:22 PM
2

Orthodox Jewish woman ‘Can’t a ho change her ways?’ Say whaaaat?
/r/MensRights18/04/12 07:25 PM
1

Who gives a fuck if he's black, The police, in many cases.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 07:24 PM
0

Yeesh. Enough with the caps lock. Sorry I'm making you rage all over your keyboard. No. I am saying that FEMINISTS would call you misogynistic for your 'old fashioned' beliefs Yeah, but who cares what they think? They are feminists after all. Then what is a 'womans' duty in your eyes? If there's an attack? Don't know. Don't care. I'm just going to do what I think is right. But it doesn't matter what I say because you'll just respond with CAPITAL LETTERS and I'll be ALWAYS wrong. So you tell me w…
/r/MensRights14/04/12 03:09 PM
1

Looks kind of like a guy.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 12:21 PM
0

I am thinking 'outside of the box' I don't think you are. You believe that because I said I was "old fashioned" I'm a misogynist, etc. etc. I have already explained why you are wrong in this regard and I will not attempt to do so again. (ie. men and women both drafted equally) I think this is where we're getting confused. I stopped talking about the draft after that second sentence up here. What I am speaking of is "duty" in the face of danger. That is, a moral obligation or responsibility to pr…
/r/MensRights14/04/12 12:16 PM
0

You are welcome to your opinion, friend. Have a good day!
/r/MensRights14/04/12 08:50 AM
-2

It's not my duty to protect... America. I'm pretty sure it is. Something about swearing an oath and what not. But hey, that's alright. I just won't depend on you, nor would I ask you specifically in the first place. If you don't feel like you should defend YOUR loved ones (which is what I was implying in the first place) during an attack, then by all means, don't.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 08:07 AM
-1

Did I say something to offend you?
/r/MensRights14/04/12 06:09 AM
-4

That's not 'old fashioned' then Guess what, "old fashioned" doesn't mean one specific type of mentality. With your backwards logic, one could assume that I also want to see a return to slavery or have our only means of transportation be that of horse drawn carriage. How about you use that big ol' brain of yours and think outside the box. You're only forcing MEN to do this whilst allowing women to 'do whatever they want'. Who said anything about forcing? You're welcome to turn your back on your d…
/r/MensRights14/04/12 04:39 AM
-5

Then if you're old fashioned, you must also think that it is (women's) duty to take care of us, be a homemaker and take care of children. X =/= Y. Women can do whatever they want to. This is why it's either one way or the other. Equality or gender roles. Then I'll pick gender roles every time. In such a hypothetical situation where we were to come under attack I would, without hesitation, take up arms to protect the people I care about. It's part of being a man. But hey, if you would rather put …
/r/MensRights14/04/12 03:50 AM
-2

Well, one way or another, it does give men and women equal rights. Either everyone has to sign up for the draft or no one does. Only problem is that there is now a 'consequence' of when a war DOES occur and we then NEED a draft. Hmm... What will we do then? It's highly unlikely since we have an incredibly large army. But men will sign up regardless. Let's face it, if we were under attack and we needed soldiers, men will enlist. Call me old fashioned but I think it's our (men's) duty to protect o…
/r/MensRights14/04/12 01:28 AM
2

You can't get your GED?
/r/MensRights14/04/12 01:03 AM
2

What sort of destruction clause do you think a court should have thrown out? One where the woman must always wear Crocs. Because no one should have to wear Crocs. Do you really think the clause said anything else? Sure. There are any number of things the clause could have said. Hence why I would like to read it.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 06:39 PM
1

Right but it doesn't specifically say what that clause is.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 04:55 PM
1

But he already agreed at the time.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 04:32 PM
-2

Probably. I guess some women just really want to take that chance at postpartum depression... Women. Am I right, fellas?
/r/MensRights12/04/12 10:16 PM
-1

Pretty much. If you willfully do not have any involvement in a child's upbringing, what makes you that kids father? I'm sure the kid wouldn't consider you his or her dad if you didn't want anything to do with him/her.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 10:11 PM
1

More importantly, this eventuality was planned for, and there was a clause in the IVF contract (the one that both the man and the woman signed) that stated the pre-embryos were to be destroyed in the event that they were divorced: Now hold on just a second. It doesn't specifically say that it would be destroyed if there was a divorce. It just says that there was a clause that would require them to be destroyed. I'd like to see what the clause actually says before I pass judgement regarding that …
/r/MensRights12/04/12 10:06 PM
10

What if it had been female on female A female robber is foiled by a female shop keep and must become the shop keeps sex slave. I swear I've seen this in a movie before.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 09:42 PM
-2

As long as I am 100% not responsible for its upbringing or financial support, no, I do not care if a complete stranger wants to use my load for baby makin.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 09:18 PM
1

Oh no you di'int! Every other day on MR there are guys that talk about not wanting a child but the woman did and he was now financially responsible. What is the difference between apathy and rejection in this case?
/r/MensRights12/04/12 09:16 PM
0

Exactly!
/r/MensRights12/04/12 09:12 PM
-1

Easy there, champ. You could pull a muscle getting so worked up. He already consented to fertilizing the pre-embryos. The deed has already been done. As long as he is not financially responsible for the child, there really shouldn't be a problem. I know that this is MensRights, but those pre-embryos are also the woman's. Maybe she doesn't want HER stuff destroyed. As for that clause in the contract stating they would be destroyed, I would have to see the contract for myself to further comment on…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 09:09 PM
-4

And as long as he doesn't have to pay for the it, neither is the kid.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 08:49 PM
-3

It's not against his will though. He already did it.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 08:46 PM
-2

I dunno. This is kind of a special case where the "father" is nothing more than a sperm donor. Surely there aren't women that go into sperm banks for IVF, and then sue the donor for child support.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 08:43 PM
-1

The court is forcing him to take a step in creating a child, to create that child. No. The court hasn't forced him to do any of that. He already did it of his own free will.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 08:35 PM
-4

But the embryos have already been fertilized. What else is there that HE has to do?
/r/MensRights12/04/12 08:33 PM
-1

Even if you set aside the fact that the forgoing of child support is NOT guaranteed in any way Well now that I'm not comfortable with. As long as I don't have to pay for it though, fuck it. It's her body and it's just my spooge. I'm far more connected to my wallet than something I shoot off into a sock every other week when my girlfriend isn't around. this man may feel responsible for something created from his own genetics. Hundreds of other men aren't. Why should he? He's got his own kid to wo…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 08:29 PM
-6

If I don't have to pay for it, no. I don't care at all. Why should I? It's just my genetic makeup. If she really feels that I, out of the billions of other potential candidates, have the best sperm available, then by all means take it. If all I'm responsible for is rubbing one out, fuck it. Here's my spooge.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 08:20 PM
-8

It's not really his problem?
/r/MensRights12/04/12 06:48 PM
-5

But he's not being forced to do it. It was already done and done on his own free will. If no monetary assistance is being asked for, what is the problem?
/r/MensRights12/04/12 06:45 PM
-9

Well... you aren't really forced to anymore. They already did the deed.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 06:43 PM
1

How do you know that didn't happen? How do you know it did? You get into incredibly dangerous territory when you start asking questions like that. If you think it's bad for men now just think about what would happen if the courts thought like you. Would anyone be able to tell the difference ? I would imagine not. The victim being an infant I doubt you could see any signs of a struggle. You could probably hold the kid underwater with just a finger.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 03:28 PM
-2

Because she said so. Well, yeah. If she wanted to kill the child by drowning it, it's not like she couldn't have held the kids head underwater.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 08:51 PM
1

That's not at all what he said.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 08:47 PM
10

Women You Should Not Date The whore. Nuff said, fellas. The feminist comes in a close second. This is the woman who thinks she is superior to you due to her vagina. You can probably scope her out accurately almost immediately. She must be avoided at all costs because you will never have an equal relationship with her. Instead, you should take this advantage to introduce yourself to her friend. The bi-dudette. Actually, I got nothing. Date her. Why not? A woman who constantly says bad things abou…
/r/MensRights09/04/12 05:05 PM
1

Anecdotally speaking, it's been completely true with all of the bisexual men I've met. They later identified themselves as being strictly gay. They also had several stereotypical gay man mannerisms (ha, man mannerisms! Oh alliteration, you so silly). I've never met a bisexual male that said something along the lines of "Yeah bro. I'm bi. Wanna fight about it?"
/r/MensRights09/04/12 04:44 PM
3

Sounds awesome.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 04:38 PM
8

Men seem to be wrong any which way no matter what they do. Except Ryan Gosling. That man will never, ever do wrong in my eyes.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 06:11 AM
8

Which is why you sing "Bitches" by MSI, right?
/r/MensRights05/04/12 04:08 AM
3

Are you speaking from experience? What does that even have to do with anything? There was no mention of the girls mother. You're making allegations without any evidence.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 03:59 AM
3

I'm the idiot? Did you even read some of those? Why do girls scream when having sex? Do women have to lice (lick) his peanuts (penis)? Why do they have sex threw the ass? What is a dildo/vibrator? What happens when a boy touches the clitoris? "Meaningful," perhaps not. But it's pretty clear some of them know enough to insert Tab A into Slot B. Plus according to this article, Cassandra told police in January that she began engaging in sexual activity as a second-grader. She also said she may have…
/r/MensRights03/04/12 02:32 AM
-1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FopyRHHlt3M
/r/MensRights03/04/12 12:45 AM
11

Is there an evil mother around? Sounds like it. Funny how there's no evidence or even mention of the girls mother whatsoever.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 09:19 PM
5

Which is weird because yours just sounds more sarcastic.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 04:39 AM
8

no emotional ties to the child or the mother. The child... maybe. The mother? Fuck that. Why should anyone keep emotional ties to people that cheat and lie to them?
/r/MensRights31/03/12 10:46 PM
7

At least it's a smooth stone.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 05:40 PM
22

I buy it, and I'm a woman who is neither single nor sexually frustrated. How could you possibly be? You know all 2,344,652 sex secrets we won't tell you about!
/r/MensRights28/03/12 05:38 PM
1

No. You're right. You never said there are people that like to get abortions. What you said was no one really likes them. This is not true So are there people that like to get abortions or not? Maybe if you had said something along the lines of, "No one likes to get abortions (because that would be stupid) but there are some people out there that think abortion is the only way to go." we wouldn't be having this conversation.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 05:58 PM
1

Is there another Helen that launched a thousand ships.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 04:02 AM
5

start all of the wars. Hellooooo! Does no one remember Helen?
/r/MensRights26/03/12 12:03 AM
5

You know someone that likes to get abortions? I'm not talking about the people you described because that doesn't mean anything. I'm asking if you know or have talked to anyone that likes to get abortions.
/r/MensRights24/03/12 06:59 AM
3

Shhh. It's best if you don't think about it. Just let it be.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 04:09 AM
1

And how soon will exo-skeletons make a person's absolute strength a moot point? Who cares? We'll have super giant robot wars at that point!
/r/MensRights22/03/12 05:15 AM
1

ಠ_ಠ This cannot be real. When did CNN start having a humor section?
/r/MensRights21/03/12 07:46 PM
1

all that means is that she doesn't see his posts, And that's all that matters. He went out of his way to put something up that she would not see. She was not supposed to see it. It was not for her eyes. the friends they share would still get to see the post and someone could have told her about the post. The friends they share would still come over to his house and see him. Someone could have told her about what he said face to face.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 03:12 PM
-2

What do you mean "you people"?
/r/MensRights20/03/12 01:34 AM
0

And I said it was evidence of anything... where? I'm not defending the woman. I couldn't possibly care less about her. The guy asked a question and I told him where the person he was responding to found that info. That is literally all I did. Jeez, you people can be so jumpy sometimes.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 12:38 AM
1

It's bad for parents to badmouth each other. Probably. But you know they're both going to do it anyway. Also, on Facebook it will reach a wider audience than word of mouth Here's where I really have a problem with this. As I understand it, Byron unfriended her and set his profile as "Friends Only" (private). That means she's not supposed to see it. No different than if he had wrote it on a mural and framed it in his house.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 11:32 PM
-2

A wise decision. Edit: And you can find your own damn link. I'm sure it's somewhere on MR. Pretty sure that's where I read it.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 10:55 PM
-3

The guy asked where it was from and I told him. That's all I'm going to do because I don't particularly care enough about what that woman has to say to show more people about it. I don't even remember what her name is. That's how little her words meant to me. Where was it said? Facebook Who said it? She did. Go find it. A high quality peer-reviewed paper quality citation. Pfft! Good luck finding a peer review of a Facebook post.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 10:44 PM
1

See it's that type of logic that can let a 15 year old be the one who rapes and murders Of course it is! That's why they're not supposed to be tried as adults.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 10:37 PM
-6

She (the wife) talked about all of that on her Facebook a few days after Byron was ordered to apologize. It's somewhere out there.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 09:40 PM
1

As such, the fact that he posted a rant on Facebook knowing that he and his wife likely still share a number of friends suggests that he did it with the purpose of embarraing his wife. So? One of the cool things about Facebook is that you can completely ignore a person. What's the difference between putting something up on Facebook and just telling a friend of theirs?
/r/MensRights19/03/12 08:57 PM
0

I don't think you know what assault is. Sexual assault is an assault of a sexual nature on another person, or any sexual act committed without consent. The term sexual assault is used, in public discourse, as a generic term that is defined as any involuntary sexual act in which a person is threatened, coerced, or forced to engage against their will, or any sexual touching of a person who has not consented. Can the child legally give consent? No. It is assault. And by the way, everyone calls stat…
/r/MensRights18/03/12 03:32 AM
7

All atheists are immoral. That's kind of their thing. Plus we eat babies and worship soup cans.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 07:14 PM
33

He said the right thing to do in a situation like that is to call police and tell them that the teens need a ride. Bullshit. The cops aren't a taxi service and they will simply tell you on the phone that they won't do anything about it. They're not there to protect and serve. They are there to uphold the law.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 07:12 PM
26

But damnit we're working on it!
/r/MensRights17/03/12 07:11 PM
1

Was she hot?
/r/MensRights17/03/12 07:38 AM
2

Poor gal. She's going to die from high-fiving. It's still just as funny thinking about girls high-fiving. Sorry.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 07:34 AM
2

It looks like a consensual relationship It is not consensual. The boy is 15. He is a child. He is not allowed to give consent no matter how awesome he is for getting some. this is going to fuck up this young guys mind. Hence why it's not consensual.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 07:29 AM
2

It looks like a consensual relationship I'm going to stop you right there. While I'm among the crowd of people that would normally be giving the kid a high five, you're simply wrong. The boy is 15. He is a child. He is not allowed to give consent. If the pair had sexual relations of any kind it is statutory rape. AKA sexual assault.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 07:27 AM
4

And their next question would be 'well, did he assault you?'. You know what? You're right. Allow me to alter that. If I told you "I am going to kill you" on Facebook you would go to the police and show them my Facebook status as evidence, right? They're both threats but the cops aren't going to ask "Well did he kill you?" to the second one. which is why it's dangerous to ignore context. And I agree wholeheartedly. I'm making an assumption about the kind of person she is based on the way she writ…
/r/MensRights16/03/12 04:42 PM
2

What? No. That wasn't directed towards you. I was trying to make a funny about what really happens when the sexes are reversed.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 04:37 PM
4

Done! http://imgur.com/haG9A
/r/MensRights16/03/12 04:27 PM
2

There is evidence. If I told you "I am going to kick your ass" on Facebook you would go to the police and show them my Facebook status as evidence, right? I don't get to back out of that one and say "Oh Torquemada1970. I was just being silly. Oh you." In the same sense, "I am going to use my child support money to buy new shoes" deserves to be looked at with the same scrutiny. The father is well within his right to call CPS and show this to them. CPS may then take what was said into consideratio…
/r/MensRights16/03/12 04:23 PM
4

Hey everybody! This guy beats up his wife, doesn't pay child support, and has gone to prison. Probably for beating up his wife.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 04:14 PM
3

Reverse the sexes and see if you still feel that way. Shhh! Nobody tell him!
/r/MensRights16/03/12 04:06 PM
2

I'd rather be rude to a random dude I don't care about than put myself at risk for harm. How do you leave your house?
/r/MensRights16/03/12 09:33 AM
30

It isn't designed to be worn anally You, sir, have just cost them a sale. Good day!
/r/MensRights16/03/12 09:28 AM
1

No. But it's the thought that counts, damnit!
/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:42 PM
1

Well I think you're pretty classy.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 04:29 PM
2

But why want it to fail? It's like the difference between the female pill and an IUD. Both do the same thing and gives women a choice in their contraceptive.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 07:27 PM
2

That's nice. But what does that have anything to do with what I asked?
/r/MensRights10/03/12 07:08 PM
12

what could the male pill do? The possibilites.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 06:42 PM
14

... You want this to fail because it's not the one you want to use? Something tells me that when latex condoms came out, you're the kind of guy that said "I hope they fail horribly. I want pigs bladder to be the only one we can use!"
/r/MensRights10/03/12 06:32 PM
24

I'm not anti-woman. I'm anti-injustice.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 06:46 PM
-5

What does circumcision have to do with the state of Israel?
/r/MensRights04/03/12 10:38 AM
-5

He speaks the truth. All this guy posts about is anti-Semetic stuff.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 09:48 AM
1

Only the good kinds.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 08:19 PM
1

Obligatory. That's not a knife. That's a knife!
/r/MensRights03/03/12 07:01 PM
2

No... Should I have?
/r/MensRights03/03/12 06:55 PM
-2

While I do agree that children don't give the most accurate accounts of events, what would you have us do? Tell the kid, "Shut up. The adults are talking."?
/r/MensRights03/03/12 09:59 AM
1

Wow. That's kind of heavy.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 07:41 AM
3

Do people hate on asexuals? Do they point and laugh and say things like "Ha! You don't particularly like anyone!"
/r/MensRights03/03/12 07:01 AM
-4

Kay. I'm just saying it's kind of a dumb analogy.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 05:02 AM
-7

Couldn't you also say "If you're against circumcision, don't get circumcised"?
/r/MensRights03/03/12 04:39 AM
2

What's the Q? Questioning?
/r/MensRights03/03/12 04:20 AM
0

um, it depends on how it's used, not what it is "Prozac is so great," Cafazzo said. "We'll never make anybody as happy as Prozac does. I just know it." If I were to use that as a source, I would be laughed at immediately. I could tell everyone it's as serious as a heart attack but it is still satire.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 06:37 PM
-2

So it's okay to be wrong as long as everyone else is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights29/02/12 09:29 AM
0

Actually I stand by that entire statement. It's valid and I explained why in the body of that text. And I, having read the body of your text, actually agree. But we're talking about statements being taken out of context, so fuck whatever else you said. You have to understand that there is a difference between taking a statement out of context by selectively quoting it, and taking a form of media out of context of an entire series. If one piece of that media doesn't convey satire, it's GOING to b…
/r/MensRights29/02/12 08:25 AM
-1

No. Stop that. Taking things out of context is practically the definition of poor communication. Here. Let's take a look at something you said that's taken out of context. "Jokes about rape, and the Holocaust, and racism CAN be funny..." When taken out of context, you are an asshole.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 07:05 AM
-3

Since when is looking at things out of context how we should be taking in information.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 05:26 AM
3

Taking this comic on it's own, it's pretty much impossible to tell Superman's not a colossal asshole. You see what I did there?
/r/MensRights29/02/12 05:23 AM
4

Right? Without even looking at the text the first thing I thought was, "Isn't this the artist that does Sinfest? Really? We're getting pissed off at Sinfest now?" Here guys. Fuck.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 12:52 AM
0

Yes. Yes I do know that. So tell me, which of these two categories does the webcomic Sinfest fall into?
/r/MensRights29/02/12 12:37 AM
23

Which is all well and good... But it's Sinfest. I mean she can use it seriously all she wants but it doesn't make it less satirical. It's like citing Foxtrot as a credible source. Edit: Or, ugh, Family Circus.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 06:00 PM
3

I, for one, am terrified.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 12:39 AM
3

Thank you, but it's really not necessary. My penis still works perfectly fine and has still given me out of this world orgasms. I've heard that men that are not cut experience more pleasure during sexual activity but I honestly can't imagine having more.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 04:02 AM
-3

Clearly we're at a standstill.... First one to spooge wins! GO!
/r/MensRights25/02/12 07:52 PM
-3

do you have any idea of the differences between the sensations a man with an uncircumcised penis has compared to one who is circumcised? Do you? As a guy who is cut, I can assure you that I really don't need more sensation.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 11:36 AM
1

Right.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 01:01 AM
1

two wrongs don't make a right It's called hyperbole.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 05:52 PM
1

(and subsidizied by the forced-equal premiums of men). And the women that don't want it.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 05:41 PM
1

It's someone else's body and not the mother's. Not their choice. It's the mothers zygote. It is her choice. It's someone else's body and not the mother's. Not their choice. I object to that because that is clearly life. What the hell is wrong with you that you would want to kill what is clearly a human baby? Sicko.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 05:06 PM
3

Not their sperm. Not their eggs. Not their body. Not their choice.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 06:23 AM
2

What I am against is this idea that abortion in and of itself, is a contraceptive. I promise you that there are fewer people that do that than you think. Sure, there are a few women out there that might think this, but they are certainly not in the majority. Hell, they're just the fringe outlier. Especially when there's the Morning After pill. There are far more women out there that would rather take that than pay significantly more to get an abortion. There was a news story a few months ago tha…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 03:09 AM
4

Should mothers be working when they have children that need them at home. Well as you previously established, dad has been removed from the home. Someone's gotta work. its about educating them on the consequences of their actions if they choose to be sexually active Abstinence, abstinence, and more abstinence. I wasn't taught much in the way of sexual education in schools, but luckily I had parents smart enough to fill in the rest. Especially when it came to contraception. Every other kid isn't …
/r/MensRights22/02/12 02:57 AM
5

I say where are the mothers? Possibly working? I don't know, man. I'm not a parent. I will say that it's kind of retarded to think that a mother would know if her daughter was pregnant when most of the time they don't even know they're having sex. You know? What with the abstinence and all.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 11:49 PM
4

You didn't answer my question and you only repeated what I said. Rare or not, they still happen. Hell, isn't Pfizer in a multi-million dollar class-action lawsuit for selling faulty birth control? What options are left?
/r/MensRights21/02/12 11:36 PM
5

Hey hey, I agree with you here. I think if people want to bang without the risk of having a child, they should take the steps provided to prevent that. I know I do. But contraceptives don't always work. What happens when you do everything right and a woman still gets pregnant but still doesn't want to give birth? What option is left?
/r/MensRights21/02/12 11:12 PM
4

Who forces women to get an abortion? No one. But I imagine it would be the same type of character that would force a woman or a couple to have a child she/they don't want. And why does it take 26 weeks? I can't answer that. If I were a woman and I found out I was pregnant and didn't want to be, I'd be at the doctor the next week at the latest. And why didnt they use contraception in the first place? Things can go wrong sometimes. Not to mention there is a lack of education with contraceptives (I…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 11:02 PM
3

its also a question of what human beings find morally disgusting It's a good thing no one is forcing you or anyone you know to get an abortion. Right?
/r/MensRights21/02/12 10:50 PM
3

Force men to have vasecomies, like thats comparable to aborting babies...? It's not? On one hand a man is forced to undergo a medical procedure (vasectomy) he may not want. On the other, a woman is forced to undergo a medical procedure (childbirth) that she may not want.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 10:39 PM
-4

I recognize the privilege of not having to buy a box of condoms every day when I see one.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 10:28 PM
-1

Thank you for saying this. I find it hard to believe that the majority here just focused on the fact that "MEN" was included in this and not the fact that it isn't directed at any of these fucks.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 10:18 PM
3

Nooooope. Not watching that.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 05:11 AM
2

Nobody celebrates Columbus Day.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:01 PM
-4

12-year old should certainly have a say in what they do to his body. Like if the kid wants to have sex, right?
/r/MensRights12/02/12 05:36 PM
1

You do realize he's already really rich, right?
/r/MensRights09/02/12 09:31 AM
1

Mine certainly hasn't. It hasn't happened to millions of others either.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 03:50 PM
-1

It's not a routine medical procedure in any Western nation except the US USA USA USA! We're #1! nor is there any consensus about "the pros outweighing the cons" It's cleaner. Prevents phimosis, paraphimosis, balanoposthitis, and urinary tract infections. Circumcised men are at a lower risk of contracting STI's. Penile cancer occurs almost exclusively in uncircumcised men. Think what you want, man, but cancer of the dick sounds horrible. And I've heard enough phimosis horror stories to not ever w…
/r/MensRights07/02/12 05:41 PM
0

If the rest of their life is in no way negatively affected from it, then sure. That doesn't seem to be the case though.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 04:55 PM
-5

And an infant's helplessness is supposed to condone unnecessary physical alterations? Sure. It's a routine medical procedure and the pros outweigh the cons. My life has not been negatively impacted because this was done to me. My penis does everything it's supposed to and the only thing I had to give up was a small piece of flesh as well as the risk of phimosis. Clearly my parents are evil demons for doing this to me. Damn them!
/r/MensRights07/02/12 08:45 AM
-4

As an infant, I didn't have a choice in any matters. That's a pretty ridiculous point.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 07:46 AM
-9

This is a human rights issue. Oh stop. It is not. If my penis just stopped doing what it's good at (i.e. fucking) then I could agree with you. I was circumcised by a rabbi and my penis is still fully functional. And it looks nicer! It's not that big of a deal.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 04:07 AM
7

I know that whenever I look at my circumcised penis all I ever think is "don'trapedon'trapedon'trapedon'trapedon'trape!"
/r/MensRights07/02/12 03:59 AM
15

Because he hates his ex-wife, he shouldn't have to support his children that are his and that he brought into the world with her. Perhaps you missed the part in the title that says If the state forces me not to be a father then I will not pretend to be one. Makes sense to me. If I don't get to see my kids I'm not going to give any money to the person that took them away from me.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:09 PM
1

Hands you the remote Say what?
/r/MensRights31/01/12 08:54 PM
-1

Stick a pole up his ass?
/r/MensRights19/01/12 11:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter