TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bobdolesdole Archive

View 3 posts and 156 comments by bobdolesdole on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

What benefit does female esteem give men?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 01:19 AM
1

"Low value"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 01:18 AM
1

Am.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 01:18 AM
1

The husband is the victim of some whore and the state.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 01:12 AM
2

Women like to be emotionally abused because of their firmware 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 11:12 PM
1

I don't care. Just saying. It's just victim blaming.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 11:08 PM
1

This should take 2 emails to resolve with the state.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 10:58 PM
1

🤘🏻
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 10:54 PM
1

Rather be a murderer than a cuck 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 10:52 PM
1

Can you shift blame any harder
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 10:50 PM
1

How is evopsych "blowing" itself out?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 11:02 PM
1

When a woman appreciates the value you bring Ohh bloopey
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 10:56 PM
2

You're niche and you're arguing it from a best practice standpoint. A 19 year old that barebacks will make thousands a day. You're only correct from a operator perspective but not from a maximizing appeal standpoint which is our argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 10:32 PM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 10:16 PM
4

Op is dodging
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 09:08 PM
3

Because most of the men in these studies are still male romantics. They still fundamentally require someone to manage their emotions and coddle them. The point of unplugging is to basically get rid of the exact effect that you're observing in this study. The goal of unplugging is to make the measurement of a man in an LTR lower or neutral to that to one who is spinning plates.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 07:09 PM
12

You honestly believe if there were two prostitutes, age 19 and age 40 that older men would consistently choose the 40 year old woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 07:00 PM
1

Did I say that no men are low libido and no women are high libido? It's as natural as the difference is grip strength. Wouldn't even be surprised if they were similar in disparity.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 08:47 AM
2

Repost of the exact last thread. Tldr tone policing
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 08:38 AM
1

You are manic. Women don't have equal sex drives.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 08:33 AM
1

Not even debatable. Studied.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 07:43 AM
1

agree, was trying to skip the obvious argument. Because all the femcels are "muh but muh face structure." Get a fuckin' nose ring. BAM. Instant 1 point. Fuck, fat is fine if she has big tits and a nice ass. 90% of "curvy" porn on the internet are fat chicks. So many fat women in porn I didn't appreciate a properly skinny woman till my 30s.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 05:26 AM
1

I mean no arguments on low class. But ugly women can't really sell themselves in that kind of arrangement. Actually ugly women, they've got to do the $25 blowjob type stuff. But truth be told, they're rare. Most women are easy to clean up, the femcel whiners are the worst. Like just don't dress like a slob, buy a nice pair of shoes, dye your hair, wear makeup and be pleasant and you're AT LEAST a fucking 5 95% of the time. Even if you're a 4, any dudes going to forget that if he's hitting your t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 05:21 AM
0

"I'll give you $700 a month, and for that I will use your holes twice a week."
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 05:18 AM
1

I mostly agree with this post. G'nizzle fuck face.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 05:17 AM
1

You don't even have a "view." I've asked you on more than one occasion to share your view on the SMP, but you have none. You just have surface level criticism, which amounts to tone policing. What in your CMV isn't tone policing? The best argument you had so far were the studies, and then you ignored the fact that if you follow that path you end up "black pilled" and just said "lul I'm not black pilled." Come on man, put your neck out. This is weak.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 05:11 AM
1

Stick your neck out, share non-personal things about who you are and what your ACTUAL views are. Not what you think "other people shouldn't think" but what YOU have an ACTUAL view on. Do you even have one? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnBdGTX3vZc
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 05:00 AM
1

Prove me wrong then. Come up with an argument that isn't tone policing, that doesn't sell the high beta angle and that you're actually conservative. Say anything, really, that just isn't "stop being jerks you guys." Or "actually, I'm cool hehe." Stick your neck out.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 04:55 AM
1

Well yeah, we should hope not. Anyone that forms their life in a way that ends up not getting laid, wtf are you doing as a man. The only difference in our value systems really comes down to "how it should be" and how it is. Take that snipped, ignore the rest of TRP in its entirety. And when you're ready, that one snippet would make sense. Men don't walk into TRP ready, they just don't. I didn't. You won't.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 04:52 AM
0

Not to mention college women legit whoring themselves out. You can be a fat slob and work at a cube farm and have a 19 year old on rotation. You have to be an absolute retard to not be able to get needs met in this climate. So long as you don't get all romantic, this is paradise.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 04:50 AM
1

I like how you go from tone policing to bro mode when all you can do is... tone police. I've had this argument before, you'll just spout about how you should be a high beta blah blah blah. Dude, talk to men who are older that have had real conflict. This is basically "everyone has a plan till they get hit in the mouth."
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 04:49 AM
1

That's a terrible angle, because then you end up on the black pill path. The strongest correlation, money, income, height, status, jawline etc... None of that. It's scent cues to facial symmetry.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 04:45 AM
2

prepared for the consequences of your choices. Which is what?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 04:38 AM
1

No, you don't have to agree with anyone to eat breakfast, lunch and dinner.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 04:37 AM
1

Man, nuance just flies right by you. How do you do it?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 04:35 AM
2

Are you "desperate" to eat breakfast, lunch and dinner?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 04:29 AM
1

Of course you don't want kids, you're young and liberal. At BEST, you'll try to say you're libertarian, an anarchist or a moderate. But once you boil it all down, it'll just be a bunch of progressive value systems. e.g. prochoice, legalize, pro gay marriage etc etc. These are all manifestations of an ideology that prioritizes "how things should be" and that's how you act. You think men "should be good to women" and that women "should appreciate men." And so you act in that accordance. But truth …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 04:29 AM
1

Not tone policing, but if you want to argue effective dating strategies, you can do it without saying things like “women are useless” or accusing them all of being “hypergamous sluts” a la TRP. So... Tone policing? I’ve actually given a lot of breadth to the redpillers who were honest and said they didn’t like women but liked having sex with them, because they were honest, regardless of how immoral that approach is. It’s actually the closest anyone has actually been to changing my view even thou…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 04:26 AM
1

Or what? That I'll "only attract damaged women?" I'm not that young man, I'm old enough to realize women are good for one thing. And so long as you really in your heart of hearts believe that, you can't really lose the game. It's when you're preoccupied with keeping the dream alive that they're "so much more than that" that there's problems. lol @ threatening me with being alone. The guys that are "alone" are the ones that get it. They're not alone. They just understand the game better. Besides,…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 04:21 AM
6

Not worth it. Trained a bitch. You prepared to beat and cheat?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 03:51 AM
3

K. Well, don't say you weren't warned. A woman being pleasant is a first order importance. If a woman can't be pleasant, she's trash. Good only for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 03:46 AM
5

Men are not "desperate." Men have much higher sex drives collectively than women can or will meet. It's biological. Aside from hitting the gym, you either look masculine or you don't - can't change the face. Can change the body though (which the gym is for) although can't change the underlying genetics of the body. Facial symmetry and composition aren't the only factors. This is just a fatalistic incel rant if you boil it down. Dudes are getting laid. The only dudes not getting laid are weak. Ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 03:45 AM
1

So you're basically here to tone police? Lets be real, it wouldn't stop there. You'd just argue these people have "the wrong view" ultimately. Once they see the view "your way" then and only then would you cede that they're "alright."
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 03:43 AM
4

So why would we stop nutting in broads?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 03:42 AM
3

You may want to ask TRP whether or not men on there have the relationships they want, I certainly do.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 03:41 AM
5

lol You've never dated a legit bitch before.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 03:36 AM
9

This is very much a chicken and egg problem. I see many people on TRP/PPD/dating subreddits say that women wouldn't be so picky in online dating and dating in general if men weren't so desperate and swiped/hit on every woman. "It's men's fault" claim women and white knights. And this isn't entirely accurate. In a scenario where you have women outnumbering men, they get less picky, but they're still a lot more picky than men. It's evolutionary. And even still, there's many examples in cultures al…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 03:31 AM
0

Sane women do not fuck men they hate. This has not been what experience of a good poonsmen.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 11:29 PM
-1

Point? Point I'm making is this OP only makes sense from a naive perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 11:22 PM
8

Subreddit does seem to be over moderated. I've submitted 3 posts, all have been auto filtered and most involve moderator input on how the post should be ran. So the "orientation" of said community seems to be at least a large part moderator input. So if you feel it's "too red" it might be because posts that are very blue are filtered and vice versa. If you feel it's neutral, it's probably because both ends are cut off. I have found that as your questions are more and more specific, the mods are …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/19 10:10 PM
1

Porn sexing just fine 🥰
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/19 09:43 PM
1

I wouldn't say by view is tradcon. Just not Liberal
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/19 09:40 PM
1

I am aware that new generation liberals are morons, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/19 09:36 PM
-1

Yeah, and you're a liberal looking for sex partners. Addressed in the reply. And of course you'll try to reframe it that you're looking for "long term" whatever, but these easy in, easy out relationships are basically just reframing FWBesc relationships by constraining it through fast change serial monogamy, it's not really any different than casual sex. Even if that's not the case, if you want to wife up a whore, that's fine, but it's just not typical. Within the OP, we're just talking about ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/19 07:12 PM
1

Assuming you're in your 20s or earlier (which makes this count very high for a lifetime projection of something like 50-100+) It depends on her purpose and orientation. BPW will reject you for LTR, select for STR. RPW (actually red pill, not tradcon women) wouldn't care, someone like Atlas wouldn't even blink at that N. The mindset is this. Women are looking to control men for LTRs, and at 19 you're actually in the outlier territory. A low outlier, but definitely out there. Someone like Atlas or…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/19 05:26 PM
15

men generally want a woman who is a great sex partner, but dont want them to have slept around to gain that experience. While a woman can get a lot of sex sessions in with a couple dedicated partners, having only a couple men to work off of narrows the scope of experience drastically. This is basically a liberal thing. If you're just looking for a "sex partner" then yes, you're correct. You're missing the context here. Which is that men want a woman they can mold into their sexual ideal. That's …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/19 04:55 PM
2

She prefers that you don’t. FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/19 01:22 AM
3

Be worried about the future, feeling sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/19 01:20 AM
3

Start another family.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/19 01:15 AM
2

🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 11:53 PM
3

I mean, you are allowed to fuck other people and she is not. Formally one sided. Depending on the cycles of the moon and the oceans, she either accepts this or "has never accepted it."
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 10:11 PM
17

Your woman just let me creampie her, said she loves you but is not in love with you. Also told me she "never does this."
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 09:18 PM
1

Since around 85% of women have children it doesn't really make sense to care too much about what percentage of those that don't are less attractive. 85% of women means that almost everyone who wants to have children, has them. In this case, your standards are clearly, even by your own admission, too high. If raw genetics are so important, sperm donation and or Tinder will make that a lot easier, but age wise you have an uphill battle. Controlling for morbid obesity, throwing a pair of tits and m…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 08:18 PM
3

AWALT
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 07:58 PM
3

fuck other women without open relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 07:56 PM
3

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 07:31 PM
14

He was in for that "my wife is my bestie" feeling that never came. I think a lot or even most of us got the feeling, and then learned that she was undeserving of her unicorn horn. And the longer you spend picking it all apart, the more busted this horse is. Grabs his crop HYAAA BITCH! WHAP WHAP "You're suuuuch an asssshole!" Gag on it WHAP WHAP ghak ghak ghak, "love you daddy!"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 06:42 PM
17

You're missing *the point.* Which is that men, as a rule, tend to overinvest. This applies to *most* men under the top 20%. What percentage of men in the top 20% are like this, IDK, but it would appear it's not many. Because most female opinions on men seem to be formed from women being pumped and dumped, manipulated or mistreated by men within the top 20%. I have never found the angle that "all men" act like they have so many options, because *most* men are constrained by male romance. That mea…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 06:24 PM
109

Most of us started as male romantics, and we learned that women like the idea of men loving them in that way, but will disregard men with this sort of disposition for men who are simply more masculine. I used to fight over the dishes, now the biggest arguments we get in are what we're going to do when another woman gets pregnant. New me had to take old me behind the shed with the 12 gauge. That dude is dead. Pussy is available everywhere, happiness is freedom. TRP was right. When you boil it all…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 05:09 PM
-1

K
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 03:24 PM
-1

In what way did you address the op or the quote?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 02:57 PM
1

I was mistaken then.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 02:56 PM
1

Didn't address my op at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 01:54 PM
1

🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 08:38 AM
2

I can't find the exact comment chain, but it was something about how women get a sense of pleasure and jealousy hearing about a woman who chopped their husbands dick off. I took it to mean that they understood that he was basically untameable, or that they fantasized about taking away the power. I wasn't sure and was reminded reading this chain. ​ You have too many comment for me to find it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 07:32 AM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 04:37 AM
1

There is no possible way we're even close to 40% of people smoking right now. TBC, I smoke and we're a dying breed. I find the 15% stat to be most likely accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 03:57 AM
1

Then why would you reply caring about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 03:50 AM
1

Are you aware of what the term irony means?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 03:44 AM
2

In another thread, unless I mixed you up, you mention that women are jealous when some other woman chops her husbands dick off. Can you elaborate on that?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 03:40 AM
1

Assuming that female N was actually proven to be detrimental to long term pairing, how would this change the debate? What do you think was the most prohibitive "soft" control mechanism that has been done away with, outside of financial disparities between husbands and wives? Or do you think that was the primary mechanism of control?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 03:35 AM
1

>why you would agree with me. We're actually skipping that debate entirely. You can start a thread stating the reverse and I doubt many RP\men are going to care. Or gender it as male etc. In fact, it's probably more useful that way IMO.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 03:27 AM
0

Post a thread *shrug*
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 03:24 AM
1

I'm not interested in the premise, but the conclusion. If I debate the premise with you, you're still not going to debate the conclusion. So I've just wasted my time then, arguing with someone else on their terms, rather than learning about my topic of interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 02:15 AM
1

I've already had that debate a bunch, it never goes anywhere. I'm skipping it, because I already have a view. If you want you can debate the view I typed out for you. But ultimately it will boil down to the fact that you have much higher burdens of proof than me, and that's where we'll differ. And then if we got that far and I wanted to actually answer the question I'm after, which is, how would this knowledge change the world, you'd just say "that's not something we know" blah blah blah like it…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 02:07 AM
1

Because people won't debate it. I mean you're not. All you're going to do is just claim I'm speculating which I've already said. I'd rather speculate than wait 30 years to be spoonfed a candy coated version of what I already know to be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 01:55 AM
1

Because I already have my own view of why it's harmful. It is my view that men and women have a naive image of their partners that becomes more pragmatic, and more jaded as they accumulate N. This naive image is the "romantic" view of partnership, and as women acculumulate N, they're left with a "red pill" understanding of the world. And so visceral arousal becomes more and more important and the "soft" stuff more and more "it would be nice." Nothing I have ever seen, has ever disputed this. Yes…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 01:47 AM
5

> I think much has been addressed already but one point is that even decent people are capable of indecency under the right circumstances and it behooves one to be aware of what those circumstances are-- no matter the person's gender or the gender of their partner, this understanding is vital Right, women with a man who has lost frame.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 01:42 AM
1

I literally gave you data... Right, and it's not conclusive. It doesn't demonstrate causality. No sociological studies do. So again, you can troll the studies as "correlation doesn't equal causation." It's pointless. You can endlessly reframe things. Is it weight? Or is it status? Is it status or impulsivity. We'll just wait 30 years to respond to that. Or you know what, have a view based on the evidence and be willing to live on it. I think N is detrimental to women, and men, but in a different…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 01:36 AM
0

then a panicked overreaction to it. It's more interesting to think about what traumatic events are in store for society. If you don't post about this in 12 hours, I will. Can't post for 12 more hours. I think you're right. And it would be an interesting discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 01:26 AM
1

"I can handle it" Great point. We know it's bad even now,we just don't care enough to do anything about it. I think we've deluded ourselves otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 01:26 AM
1

I would be happy for you to engage with me I'm not interested in the debates you're interested in, because they are defacto pointless discussions. You can spam every thread with a study with "correlation doesn't equal causation" and you wouldn't even be able to tell if the response is serious or parody. The debate on the SMP ultimately requires you to speculate, otherwise you're merely a spectator. To me, it's like being an atheist. I had to take some leap of faith that "there's probably not a g…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 01:22 AM
1

Interestingly enough, it does seem as though young liberal males are almost systematically going against their own intuition, entirely outside of this debate. Any topic that has any obvious intuitive realization devolves into requiring to be spoon fed to even move from the position of militant adoption of the "correct" skeptical response. e.g. The translete debate. And part of that seems to be some conflict between ideology and pragmatism. So I guess, do you think there would be any change to li…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 01:17 AM
1

Well I am engaging other users. For instance, an interesting point was brought up regarding food intake. We all know eating terrible is bad for you, yet most of us are overweight. These are arguments that accept the OP as stated, and bring up great discussion points. I'm sure you have some gold like that somewhere, it's just that I guess I'm not smart enough to see your insight. Because when I read your responses, they all seem to be formed outside of the argument. I'll have to hit the books, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 01:05 AM
2

I'm not, you're allowed to post. It's a discussion, anything you think is relevant, people can discuss here. It's just unlikely I'll respond because I won't think it's relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 01:03 AM
2

You seem to be under the impression everyone here is bound by your premise and isn’t allowed to contest them. You are wrong. Not at all, I've explicitly told you that you're allowed to post here. It is absolutely within the rules that you can "attack my premise." I just don't have to recognize it, because that isn't my premise. That's your view, of my thread. I can't stop you from posting, but I'm not obligate to kick the football through the goalposts after you shift them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 01:00 AM
3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought_experiment Since you're unaware this is a thing I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 12:59 AM
1

You bring up an interesting point. Given that you are much better at seeing how these things trickle down, if any action would take place, where do you think it would? What impact if any do you think it would have? To the world at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 12:58 AM
3

Go start your own thread then. This isn't a debate, it's a discussion and tagged appropriately. You're still free to pollute this thread just like you did the other, I think it's permitted by rules. So by all means, discuss your studies from 30 years ago. I also should point out our future is exactly the same as 2019, just the studies are far more advanced, and indisputable.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 12:54 AM
2

You're not arguing the premise. The studies in this OP are 30 years in the future of the ones you linked me to. Did you even read the OP?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 12:51 AM
1

So you think if they released a bunch of studies linking video game usage, concretely to mass shootings society wouldn't do anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 12:50 AM
0

Interesting point.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 12:45 AM
6

I think that's a great inspiration for a thread you can start.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 12:44 AM
1

You really going to pretend that studies of harm have zero influence on the population? Much less that the government doesn't care?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 12:42 AM
3

Yes people make choices, but the choices at least 2/3 make is to eat themselves into an early grave. Some people get more money from it. where is the broader benefit? This is the gold I mine for, thank you!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 12:25 AM
1

Those people are morons though, I still can't understand your rationale for the understanding gap, given that you're not a moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 12:16 AM
2

If you were to speculate, what sorts of hamster arguments would ensue?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 12:14 AM
1

Sort of pointless reply. "You can't fire me, I quit!"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 12:14 AM
2

https://uwaterloo.ca/tobacco-use-canada/sites/ca.tobacco-use-canada/files/uploads/images/1_1_2019_figure_0.jpg What do you make of this then?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 12:12 AM
1

Could you expand out of what you think the narrative would be and how people would act in this future?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 12:07 AM
0

Are you not just projecting inherently liberal views though? e.g. We think there are benefits to globalization\can restructure social security etc. What about more concrete examples, e.g. smoking risks I suppose we could look at the debates about recreational cocaine use\legalization.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 12:06 AM
2

We're just debating if such a thing was true. Sort of pointless to rehash the same debate about whether or not it is bad a thousand times. Now we've moved forward to have a new debate about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 12:05 AM
1

Again, other users understand this. It's only you that needs additional, considerable instruction. But thank you, it's needed back and forth to understand how to word these types of things. e.g. the thread I posted today.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 12:02 AM
1

Right, but we're not having an open debate, this is a "pointed question." Which is why other posters, with similar concerns have posted under automod. As a courtesy, because they're not directly answering the question, they're trying to reject the premise. I'm not interested in defending the premise, because that is a different intellectual pursuit I am interested in.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 11:58 PM
1

Also no studies "prove" anything, they merely give evidence supporting something and correlations https://uwaterloo.ca/tobacco-use-canada/sites/ca.tobacco-use-canada/files/uploads/images/1_1_2019_figure_0.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 11:56 PM
1

Do you feel viscerally disgusted by fat women in public/online? At about 45% BMI, yes. Would you feel viscerally disgusted by your previously skinny LTR becoming fat? Had it happen, no. I was very accepting. I mostly viewed her as just an overweight version of the woman I loved. I actively disregarded lower attraction to her and focused on growing "deeper" intimacy. I regret this. I think as men we assume that women would appreciate the slack. But instead they just get insecure and in no positiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 11:53 PM
1

This question? No. You're putting the horse before the carrot.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 11:43 PM
1

We value freedom more than we value society continuing to exist. I think that's pretty clear with the way in which the world operates. T Care to elaborate?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 11:41 PM
1

Within the scope of this debate, no. Within the debate of the study, I think you have to have a view on all the possible "permutations" before you can really look further. It's easy to say that status might be what we are viewing, which is manifested as weight. But we also could be viewing impulsivity manifesting as weight, and attractiveness as a function of weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 11:38 PM
1

Society does not believe the N has a negative influence, so this would be expected as it stands. So you don't believe it would move past where we are right now then?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 11:35 PM
1

Attractive people get what they want more than vice versa. That was the way I saw it as well. Was interested in seeing other possible opinions, without increasing the scope of the thought\debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 11:32 PM
1

What narratives do you think would be most prevalent in this future? So you would imagine a widespread blue pill conspiracy, where they disregard the studies and instead claim they are false? Would this not lead to a rejection of science itself?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 11:31 PM
1

How do you think the narrative would change?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 11:29 PM
2

Thread is not about male N count.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 11:28 PM
1

In a vacuum. Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 11:21 PM
0

But we do regulate alcohol and smoking. In this future, would regulating female sexuality be wrong, or just an extension of our knowledge of the dangers of it?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 11:17 PM
1

k. Well, if you only account for those two variables, attraction and weight, do you have any speculated reason why those two variables perform the way they do without introducing another?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 11:16 PM
1

Because it's controlled for in the debate. Honestly what is your aim here? To speculate about the influence of weight and attractiveness on N. OBVIOUSLY. Not to waste time talking about other issues. If I start a thread on "which is the coolest muscle car of the 1960s?" you think I want to have a debate on whether or not its ethical or safe to own a car from the 1960s? I'm interested on perspectives of the influence of weight and attractiveness on N, if N increases with weight and decreases with…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 11:10 PM
1

Restated for you "Provided that only attractiveness and weight determine a woman's N count, what is the influence of strictly these variables? e.g. Why do women of healthy weight, have lower partner counts than women who are overweight (controlling for all other variables)?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 11:03 PM
1

If the study is formed correctly, why would you speculate it's an issue of class? An issue that would be controlled for? You're still in the locker room the best I can gather. Unless you can formulate something based on variance of N based on only two variables. Attractiveness Weight You're introducing more variables (e.g. class).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 10:46 PM
1

I don't even understand what you're talking about. But this is just how you deal with a LTR that starts acting up. What's a guy going to lose about a woman being a bitch? Worst case scenario is the bitch leaves, literally. First line is WHERE sex = good, this is to be applied where you already have fluid bond etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 10:43 PM
1

That's the game you gotta play if you're in the provider paradigm. You think Billy is going to be able to pull that? Nah.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 10:40 PM
0

Much more enjoyable to let them hang themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 09:56 PM
1

You're commenting as if the study is formed incorrectly.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 08:54 PM
0

Well yeah, it's designed with failure as an expected. It's exactly as you point out. Cats signing contacts.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 08:52 PM
1

The only variables clearly supplied are attractiveness and weight. Again, I've been trying to extend an olive branch here, maybe I don't understand you. As I understand it, you are offering an explanation of why you think the study is ill formatted, e.g. missing a control. Is that correct? I don't understand how you speculate its an issue of class unless you are saying they did not control for that. That's what I've been asking. You seem to imply that you think the study did not control for clas…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 07:47 PM
1

I responded to your OP as asked No, you did not. Obviously you are free to respond in any way you see fit, but let me be clear, you did not answer it as asked. Or at least you can not, or refuse to understand it. Either way, I understand you're not going to answer the OP, but I want to be clear you did not answer it as asked.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 07:39 PM
0

Dealing with women, alpha build. Where sex = good, otherwise run DUMP Set a requirement of behavior (be genuinely pleasant), specify the punishment (disproportionate, e.g. a hall pass). Collect prize Goto Line 1
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 07:14 PM
1

Right, because everything is controlled for. Why bother replying when it's so clearly outlined to avoid people like you replying. Pretty rude, don't you think?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 06:58 PM
1

You're speculating about the study.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 06:23 PM
1

Right. So I'm asking to speculate as if the study has controlled all variables except attractiveness and weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 06:21 PM
1

From what I can see your speculation is that the study doesn't control for class. Unless I'm misunderstanding this.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 04:57 PM
1

Only because you are willing to tolerate masculine women because you're a masochist. You're a standard MRP red pill aware, high beta. For as much as you get around, you'd think by now you'd learned that a woman not being a pain in your ass is #1.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 02:07 AM
1

Did you read this? That's confirmed. Sex workers would be removed as outliers. These are median measurements.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 11:45 PM
1

The question is theoretical.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 10:42 PM
1

Is it called porker?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 10:41 PM
1

I don't understand your opinion. It seems to be commentary on a variable you think isn't controlled for. Is that correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 10:38 PM
0

Can you reread the op again please?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 10:17 PM
1

TY for posting under automod
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 10:13 PM
2

Controlled for and repeated. Thoughts then?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 10:13 PM
1

The primary mechanism for women leaving men is SMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 10:08 PM
1

Can you elaborate on two?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 09:23 PM
1

As in lie?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 09:16 PM
4

Question is ultimately theoretical.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 09:16 PM
2

This isn't being hypergamous, this is just lowering your standards. Being hypergamous would be divorcing your wife for your secretary and then making her pay you child support, give you half the house and alimony for kids you decided to raise together. And then society blaming your wife for not being good enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 07:07 PM
4

What solution do you propose to men who want fulfilling sex lives that aren't female controlled?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 06:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter