TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

boboclock Archive

View 0 posts and 28 comments by boboclock on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
15

While I agree circumcision is bad, wish it wasn't done to me and wouldn't do it to my child, I have to say the correlation doesn't seem too strong based on the way I learned statistics. Globally (weighted): Increase of 0.6 (95% CI=0.01–0.1, t=2.86, p=0.01) per 1000 live-births SIDS mortality per 10% increase in circumcision rate. US (weighted): Increase of 0.1 (95% CI=0.03–0.16, t=2.81, p=0.01) per 1000 live-births unexplained mortality per 10% increase in circumcision rate
/r/MensRights13/12/20 03:04 PM
1

Some states define rape, or their equivalent charge, as forced penetration, which does not allow for women to be charged for that crime. In Montana this is however, not the case. "45-5-503. Sexual intercourse without consent. (1) A person who knowingly has sexual intercourse without consent with another person commits the offense of sexual intercourse without consent. A person may not be convicted under this section based on the age of the person's spouse, as provided in 45-5-501(1)(a)(ii)(D)" E…
/r/MensRights03/07/18 12:01 PM
1

The sex offender list is already overused. Two wrongs don't make a right. It can be impossible for people to live when on the registry. You have to notify prospective employers so good luck getting a job. It's nearly impossible in many cities to find a house you can live in because sometimes there isn't housing that isn't near a school, church, or park. In some states you have to identify yourself as an offender to every neighbor when you are planning to move and even keep a sign in your yard. F…
/r/MensRights01/06/18 12:49 AM
0

Evil? Isn't that a bit fanatic of language? It's not like circumcision is recognized for the wrong that it is. Most of male America is circumcised. Judgment makes people dig in and push back. His admissions can be used to educate others - attacking him doesn't solve anything.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 03:31 PM
-1

I applaud your efforts. I am for men's rights and women's rights (but banned from r/feminism for disagreeing with the accuracy of a title) and am often accusing y'all of bordering on being a woman haters club, this kind of thing makes me hope there is some sincerity in the MRM... then I read the comments..
/r/MensRights17/03/18 07:47 PM
1

Thank you for providing some context of your opinion, which OP lacked. I would still be of the opinion that Cosmopolitan overall isn't a very common feminist battleground - but I find them claiming that objectify in women is wrong, while selling beauty products and magazines with half naked models and celebrities would be the bigger hypocrisy, as I don't think a stance of non-objectification of women could seriously be considered their m.o. But I do get your point now, with provided context.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 09:19 PM
1

What did I contradict in that comment by not blindly echoing the sentiment of the OP? There's no reason that men's rights has to copy the anti-sex or anti-biology aspects of feminism. Many modern feminists are even veering away from it and calling themselves sex positive feminists.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 07:11 PM
1

Let's not demonize sexuality just because some feminists do. Women's magazines "objectify" women just as often as they "objectify" men; they are often the target of feminists and only push feminists agendas at the most commercial and minimal of levels. They're trash, but this is hardly the most egregious thing they've done. And whole websites and subreddits exist towards posting cameltoe and other forms of near nude shots of women, so let's not pretend that this is exceptional.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:09 PM
1

No. The government enforces a responsibility on the mother and father to care for a child. If one abandons the child, the other has the optional recourse of suing for custody and or support money. If the absent mother or father fails to pay, then the state may get involved in a more direct manner. If both abandon the child, it becomes a criminal affair more quickly. If no one else intervenes, the state's i.e. the taxpayer. Which, I am willing to accept, as long as both parents have been asked (o…
/r/MensRights03/02/18 09:00 PM
1

Fatherhood isn't a criminal offense. Failing to support a child is. For mothers as well. So then, if a man fathers a child, and the woman fails to pay fully for it's food, shelter or health - whose obligation should it be?
/r/MensRights03/02/18 06:35 PM
1

So, you disagree that if a man has sex, it may fertilize an embryo? Or do you disagree that women should not be forced into taking medication or having an operation that could be life threatening?
/r/MensRights03/02/18 06:16 PM
1

No. I am against anyone telling anyone else what to do with their body. That extends somewhat to their financial lives, which is why I think we would agree that many, perhaps the majority of child support cases go too far. But children can't raise themselves, it's only fair that until they are legally left to fend for themselves, both parents are responsible for doing so - so that we, the taxpayers, aren't left with the bill.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 06:04 PM
1

It is, by biological function, a risk of parenthood. There is no belief or justice involved until after the simple fact that by putting his penis in a vagina, a man is taking a chance of fathering a child.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 05:17 PM
1

How is it not a choice for a man to have sex?
/r/MensRights03/02/18 04:46 PM
1

The father has 50% of the choice before conception, just like the mother. If the man knows that by having sex, it could result in a child, he has a choice. If he doesn't use birth control or doesn't use it properly, that is his failing. If the birth control fails, it was his responsibility to know that risk.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 04:36 PM
2

Why should a father have no responsibilty for a life he created? It sounds more like the state enforcing that a child's life is protected and that the child's raising doesn't fall on the state. How is that the state enforcing male-biased financial slavery? I would agree that often child support is unfairly balanced, but that the very existence of it is financial bias is an absurd abstraction to me..
/r/MensRights03/02/18 03:57 PM
1

Are you toying with me, you haven't answered as to how or why the state is involved..
/r/MensRights03/02/18 03:24 PM
1

How does the state make sure of it? When did this start? What is the state's motive?
/r/MensRights03/02/18 02:24 PM
0

Ah yes, all women are gold diggers and all relationships are entrapment.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 01:42 PM
-2

Yeah, cause we don't care if there are women at our bars or dance clubs...
/r/MensRights02/02/18 04:17 PM
-7

Can it not be both?
/r/MensRights19/01/18 09:48 PM
-11

The first tweet was great but then he had to get all hypocritical with it.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 03:40 PM
1

Politicians get away with hypocrisy constantly, if they wanted to keep up whitewashing and dodging they could. The Dems believe taking the moral high ground will win them swing votes. Washington insiders have said as much. This has been a losing strategy of theirs for a long time. The Republicans know how to take moral superiority through down and dirty outrage (see pro-life tactics), the Democrats compromise their own position by being unwilling to compromise their moral signaling. They should …
/r/MensRights10/12/17 11:44 PM
1

I think it could be very well that insiders like Roger Stone knew Franken had a reputation and so groomed Tweeden to come forward, with hopes to bring out other more legitimate complaints, and then heaped on anonymous claims at less than reputable news sources like Briebart when those weren't effective enough on their own. And the Dems walked into it with their sacrificial kamikaze attack against Roy Moore and Trump. Franken was a good Senator. He was their best weapon during public hearings. It…
/r/MensRights10/12/17 09:29 PM
1

Literally did not say that.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/17 06:16 PM
-6

You guys are basing your understanding of the scene off of a headline of a writer you disagree with just to be angry. The article is interpreting the scene through their own form of stupid sjw lens, and you are in turn doing the same based off of your stupid sjw lens of the article.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 03:46 PM
2

To me they didn't seem to mean mensrights is white supremacist at all. They meant it is a radical group; which it's not, but many members say some pretty radical things. I lurk a lot here when posts reach all but I've never joined because I am put of by what seems to me, a lot of hateful posts aimed at women, liberals, and social activists that disagree. I agree that men often get the raw deal in the modern western world. I agree that women get a lot of special treatment and modern feminism is o…
/r/MensRights13/08/17 06:23 PM
86

Funny that this second hand report tells such a different story than the man himself: http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/elon-musk-breaks-his-silence-on-amber-heard-split-w496514 Stuff like this makes this movement come off like a hate group, no better than the modern feminist sjw that it hates.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 02:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter