TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bobuhbeartoe Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by bobuhbeartoe on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I'm just saying that you identified that the joke you were going to make was, in fact, sexist, and then continued to make it under the guise that you "want to but shouldn't"
/r/MensRights22/05/13 05:56 PM
2

Well then good thing you totally didn't just say that sexist joke then
/r/MensRights22/05/13 05:29 PM
16

Seriously, is it a men's right to bash on someone's life choice and career path? This has nothing to do with men's rights, this is just petty and sticking it to those pesky feminists!!!
/r/MensRights22/05/13 05:19 PM
1

Exactly
/r/MensRights07/04/13 04:23 AM
0

That's good to hear. But in regards to the downvoting, I meant that users like herbandmargie, memymineown, CrossHook, etc are positive in voting with their cissexism (and apparent inability to differentiate between sex and gender). But I digress. I don't want to bash on people, just those pervasive ideas. Your comments throughout this thread haven't exhibited any of those bigoted thoughts, but your cohorts do.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 09:59 PM
-1

yeah, I didn't necessarily mean I agreed with the comments you replied to in the OP, but more to your fellow MRAs replying to the hidden comment at the bottom of this thread, dehumanizing and taking away the agency of trans people by calling cis people normal, as well as pointing out a distinct lack of support for LGBTQ people in this sub. Or maybe not, maybe those aspects are overshadowed within this sub
/r/MensRights06/04/13 09:48 PM
1

I don't get it. Why alienate those who could benefit from your cause? Any person who identifies as a man, be he cis or trans* or genderqueer, should be able to feel welcome to participate and feel accepted in a community fighting for civil rights. I especially don't understand the point in bashing intersectionality, as that is a construct which could perform in any movement, even your own.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 09:37 PM
1

is that why you repeated your argument so many times just now? and thanks for assuming just because I don't have a neckbeard that I'm a woman, makes me honestly feel better about being a male feminist
/r/MensRights30/12/12 04:35 PM
-8

the law! that's never been immoral, has it? and shit, I never realized that rape and drunk driving were on the same level. thanks for the ad hominem slurs too, they add a touch of class to your otherwise immoral and indecent arguments
/r/MensRights30/12/12 05:28 AM
-6

http://stopviolenceuw.wordpress.com/2011/08/23/consent-while-drunk-is-not-consent/ http://www.safercampus.org/blog/2008/04/alcohol-and-consent/ http://teenadvice.about.com/od/daterape/a/daterapeguysfyi_2.htm or, to sum up: If a girl is intoxicated she cannot consent to sex and you could be charged with rape. It does not matter whether you knew she was intoxicated, it doesn’t matter if you were intoxicated too, all that matters is that she was not in a state of mind to consent and therefore it is…
/r/MensRights30/12/12 05:18 AM
-9

a man gets drunk and holds a woman down and forces her to have sex not to bring semantics into this, but I'm pretty sure you just described rape. secondly, what if he gives her an STD? then is it tough shit? or are you treating women differently? thirdly, I love how scared you are of taking responsibility. last time I checked, I thought all adults were supposed to be responsible for their actions. god forbid you actually have to pay and care for the life your brought into this world lastly, I ne…
/r/MensRights30/12/12 05:06 AM
-11

How illogical of me to think that when I can't make proper judgments I may not want to have sex. Nobody has ever made a decision they wouldn't have made sober while drunk, have they?
/r/MensRights30/12/12 04:47 AM
-14

wow, let's blame the victim more, shall we?
/r/MensRights30/12/12 04:37 AM
-10

no but I want to hear why it's not rape to have sex with a mentally and physically impaired person without proper judgment due to being under the influence
/r/MensRights30/12/12 04:21 AM
-9

plus, if she's under any amount of influence, that completely nullifies her consent.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 04:12 AM
-9

yes, that is exactly what he is saying. it is impossible to give consent while drunk
/r/MensRights30/12/12 04:09 AM
2

also true, but that's not what I'm talking about. first of all, the POV of these posters is from the man, obviously with the intent of having sex with the woman. the fact that it mentions that "she's" easy already puts the position of power into the man's hands, at least in the context of this poster. Sure, if it said "the person you're trying to fuck" is easy, you're above comment would be valid. the point is, in the situation of the poster, the man is seeking consent from the woman, and since …
/r/MensRights30/12/12 03:58 AM
1

any amount of alcoholic/substance impairment automatically nullifies her consent
/r/MensRights30/12/12 03:30 AM
1

I don't even know what that means
/r/MensRights04/11/12 01:52 AM
-1

Well, life is not a romantic comedy, and not every woman in a bar/any other setting is not hoping to be approached by a strange man with your patented Nice Guy approach
/r/MensRights03/11/12 06:38 PM
-1

ad·ver·tise·ment; noun; definition: a public notice, especially in print the action of making generally known; a calling to the attention of the public sex·ism; noun; definition: Sexism is both discrimination based on gender and the attitudes, stereotypes, and the cultural elements that promote this discrimination. Given the historical and continued imbalance of power, where men as a class are privileged over women as a class (see male privilege), an important, but often overlooked, part of the …
/r/MensRights03/11/12 06:17 PM
0

Well, aside from the fact that this advertisement being marketed toward women does not make it inherently discriminatory, and that FtM "sexism" doesn't exist, no. I don't see it. At all. Ads like these are geared toward women because they are typically the ones being harassed by men in this setting
/r/MensRights03/11/12 12:53 AM
1

This isn't about that, though. This thread is about when the woman chooses to have and keep the child. I agree with your point, but it's unrelated
/r/MensRights02/11/12 11:28 PM
1

Thanks, guys, for explaining it and not just downvoting me because of my confusion
/r/MensRights02/11/12 11:18 PM
4

Jesus christ how hard is that to understand? The hivemind complaining about (nonexistent) misandry and female privilege in this thread is unbearable
/r/MensRights02/11/12 06:21 PM
1

If the man has the foresight to know that he doesn't want to father any children and his partner will not allow him to use condoms, then he shouldn't be fucking her in the first place. The consent form for raising a child is putting your dick inside her, because he knows the consequences
/r/MensRights02/11/12 06:09 PM
-2

I'm failing to see how this is sexist
/r/MensRights02/11/12 04:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter