TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bokabo Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by bokabo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

No. My coworker is married to a dentist. And I to an engineer. Both of us are in all likihood to be out earned by our spouses. Plenty of well off women marry guys at least somewhat less wealthy than they. And as women become more and more prevalent in upper management/senior roles in companies this trend will continue.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 05:19 AM
0

What? Why? If i lived under the delusion thst all men where rapist and all women were gold digging whores would I fit your worldview? Because it seems pretty damn illogical to me.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 03:33 AM
1

So, mary a rich woman?
/r/MensRights25/03/15 03:28 AM
-2

One true scotsman falicy from the start renders every word after it void and demonstrates OPs point perfectly. "Feminist" isn't some homogenous group think populated by robots. It's a loose collection if individual actors. I promise you there is a nonzero number of them who would agree with at least part of your positions. Phrases like "the feminists did x" are useless reductionist platitudes that are analogous to pleas of "the patriarchy did x". Which accomplishes nothing but instill that the o…
/r/MensRights25/03/15 03:27 AM
0

Stop conflating a false accusation as a false conviction. Especially one that, in her case she was coerced to make. His story is tragic. But it isn't only because she accused him wrongly. It's because his guilt was assumed by the courts in lieu of evidence. He should have never been convicted or sentenced. The state should pay the bulk of his reparations. Ut was their incompetance more than her stupidity that ruined his life.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 11:56 PM
1

And a good chunk of this one is misogynist hodong behind the mens rights label. We wouldn't deliberately conflate the two now would we? If this movement is going to gain any traction we're going to need to.hold ourselves to a higher standard.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 05:19 PM
0

I'm every bit serious. Would you rather be assaulted or be accused of assault? The accusation alone shouldn't have lead to a comviction. That should have also required evidence. Your trivializing sexual assault/rape. It's not simply done and overwith
/r/MensRights06/10/14 05:17 PM
1

Some people are wise enough to realize wages mean less than their sanity. After a certain dollar amount work conditions become more influential than wages.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 07:17 AM
0

I counted 3 well.constructed arguements or definitions in this thread that didn't immediately assune all femenist concerns were bullshit. And I sorted by best. I give a shit about the state of men in the world. The state of unreasonable laws agaist them. However, when we denounce all concerns of femenism outright, without context. It serves no purpose but to further ingrain in femenist and those undecided on gender issues that MRA is a synonym with misoginist. That, hurts our movement. Hurts our…
/r/MensRights06/10/14 03:37 AM
-1

Most of these responsed aren't well thought out responses. Instead, they equate femenism to man hate and leave it at that. That's incredibly disengenous.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 03:12 AM
-1

If an entire subset of the population avoids your line of work. You might try treating your employees better
/r/MensRights06/10/14 02:52 AM
-2

Her life is ruined. At worst she gets hit with pergery. Which would be fair. A false accusation of a crime is not as heinous an act as actually committing the crime. The failure of justice was not with her punishment. But with his conviction. The standard of reasonable doubt was never applied in his case. And even with the accusation should never had been in jail for 5 years.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 02:33 AM
-2

Rightfully. So. People are completely denoucing an entire movement because of It's fringe members. It's embarassing.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 02:14 AM
1

If the actual state of the universe is that your actions have been predetermined by the time you make them you're not evaluating what humans should and shouldn't do. You're evaluating what they will or won't do given conditions. Without the imputice of choice discussions of ethics turn into discussions of analytic and social engineering. And indeed, even if you believed that what you had done was wrong. You would have no way to stop it. As your "choice" was not made by you but instead for you.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 10:00 PM
5

In regards to ethics it's functionally equivalent of throwing your hands in the air and saying it's irrelevant and tuning out of the conversation.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:27 PM
2

Aren't entirely in control of and lacking are IMO worlds apart. I can accept easily that at times we as creatures have our agency impaired or it's incomplete. That is a very navigable assertion in ethics. To assert that it doesn't exist IMO breaks the field. I fully agree that the subconcious absolutely effects decision making. And any modern form of ethics should account for that.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:23 PM
5

No, then we're fatalist. Ethics and decision.making are meaningless and void. To many. Myself included it is considered self evident.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:03 PM
8

A revision of what agency entails is absolutely a discussion worth having. I just feel that saying you don't have any. Makes the discussion useless. If you aren't able to control what your actions are. There is little reason to create an entire system to determine what actions ought to be taken. To me agency to some extent or form is axiomatic for a discussion about ethics. Otherwise it's a discussion of what powers control people. An analytically question, not an ethical one.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 08:11 PM
12

I'd argue that any meaningful discussion of ethics necessitates that you accept human agency. This is IMO no different. At some point the decisions you make must become your own.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 07:03 PM
2

Bullshit. Every part of it. I'm all for mens rights but this is nothing but gender elitism. Women are more tban fully capable of acting in bussiness and other nondomestic fields.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 04:01 PM
5

The first assumption is simply false. If anything their should be higer interest levels as it's far more likely tha girl has hit puperty fully at that age than it is for a boy. Any outward disinterest comes from socialization that results in hypersexuality in males and hyposexuality in girls. Not from any difference in urges. I'll allow most of the rest. The girls being told they're broken due to sex and men applauded for it at that age is IMO a symptom of the gender targeted socialization at a …
/r/PussyPass18/06/14 12:56 AM
2

So, TL:DR is that she nor anyone else should be in trouble for this but are because of a silly law? I'm struggling to see the gender predjudice here.
/r/PussyPass17/06/14 09:14 PM
7

Ideally, both should be shunned. At 13 neithet boys or girls are mentally capable of giving sexual consent to an adult. The adult who does it should be punished anyway. Many 13year old girls would probably fuck a hot older dude if they could as well. And in both cases you blame the adult for being irresponsible.
/r/PussyPass17/06/14 07:33 PM
10

Seriously. We should be upset she got time at all.
/r/PussyPass17/06/14 07:29 PM
-6

God you're a grade a asshole. Wishing death upon another because you weren't satisfied with the length of her punishment is fucking terrible. She fucked up. She got jail time. Her life shouldn't end because you're angry
/r/PussyPass17/06/14 07:19 PM
5

Damn :( that's depressing
/r/MensRights03/05/13 02:36 AM
2

Actually I just looked at their website and was quite surprised. Their mission statement reads "The Family Place provides free, comprehensive services that prevent violence and fully support women, children and men on their path from fear to safety". Men aren't front and center but it's certainly clear that men have the possibility to be abused and aided. Who knows maybe they've cleaned up bit. I'll have to see more of their actions before I give true judgement however.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 01:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter