TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bombeater Archive

View 0 posts and 146 comments by bombeater on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Are you expecting me to defend her behavior? I'm not really sure what your point is. That's obviously a very shitty and unacceptable thing for her to do.
/r/ExRedPill23/06/16 09:34 PM
1

I'll start being scared when one of these women actually goes on a misandrist killing rampage. Until then, I'd rather spend my SJW dollars getting offended at rape jokes.
/r/ExRedPill18/06/16 09:52 PM
1

I lump them together because I see them together. Never experienced any kind of bubble like you have described. I guess we've just seen different sides of the world.
/r/ExRedPill13/06/16 09:39 PM
2

It's the feminist equivalent of a tasteless rape joke. I find both of them to be in very bad taste for exactly the reason you're describing.
/r/ExRedPill13/06/16 09:09 PM
1

No, many of their peers are not radical by any stretch of the imagination. It's rather nuanced and that's why these conversations can be so difficult. You simply cannot write off everyone who says or condones things you don't like as "radical". It's reductionist and inaccurate.
/r/ExRedPill13/06/16 07:35 PM
3

If you think about it, the proportion doesn't really matter, though--I follow about 200 people, and around 500 people follow me. That's a tiny fraction of the total Twitter population, but it represents 100% of my experience with the platform. The only "celebs" that end up on my timeline are, like, Snowden, and that's because I follow him & he still has less than 1,000 tweets (941 at time of writing). my timeline is mostly programmers, writers, and gamers (both players and developers). I and doz…
/r/ExRedPill28/05/16 05:29 AM
3

We're in agreement there!
/r/ExRedPill28/05/16 12:22 AM
13

Sorry, I guess I just don't understand what you're trying to say. If you support the rights of humans, and all females are human, and all women are females, then the rules of logic would state that you "support the rights of women", and that you "support the rights of men". Unless I'm really missing something.
/r/ExRedPill28/05/16 12:04 AM
14

Wouldn't it be more accurate to say, "I support the rights of women because I support the rights of all people"? The way you phrased it seems kind of self-contradictory. Or perhaps you meant, "I don't only support the rights of women"?
/r/ExRedPill27/05/16 11:38 PM
4

I use Twitter regularly for both professional and personal networking; I assure you that there are lots of reasons to take it seriously!
/r/ExRedPill27/05/16 11:36 PM
10

They, too, evolve and shift over time.
/r/ExRedPill27/05/16 10:37 PM
8

It doesn't matter what I think. There are many women who make jokes using that kind of rhetoric but are not considered "radical" by their peers.
/r/ExRedPill27/05/16 10:36 PM
13

No one owns the definition of a word. Just because many of us want it to be synonymous with "supports equal opportunities for everyone" doesn't mean it's a foregone conclusion.
/r/ExRedPill27/05/16 08:49 PM
5

It's more than just "radicals". There are plenty of otherwise-reasonable women on Twitter (for example) who like to bandy around anti-male sentiments with varying degrees of seriousness. It's just feminist version of being "edgy", and it's about as helpful.
/r/ExRedPill27/05/16 08:48 PM
2

It doesn't even have a link to the actual study.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/16 06:29 PM
1

"N" count?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 05:46 AM
1

Not really. They're all attractive to me or I wouldn't be involved with them, so who gives a shit? There's no correlation anyway. My partners run the gamut in body types and adherence to traditional perceptions of attractiveness. I find it hilarious that TRPers spend so much time hating on "betas" with low self worth while laboring under the most pernicious self-deprecating myth of all: that your worth is partially determined by how much other men want to put their dick in the women you associat…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 01:35 AM
2

"Feminists" are? Which? How do you know I'm not feminist and whether I agree with that statement or not? That's it. I can't do it anymore. This sub is too fucking dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 12:55 AM
3

"Women and feminists"? Which? Who? When? What does this have to do with feminism or "pill" philosophy?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 12:29 AM
1

cool yeah just disappear now that it's clear you are wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/16 05:44 PM
1

How does being nice and sensitive become "submissive"? What does "submissive" mean to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/16 08:31 AM
7

What the fuck? That post says NOTHING about being a "horrible person" or "secretly a bad person on the inside". The poster said that your "success with women may be a rough proxy of your personality". You blew the point outrageously out of proportion to support your preposterous conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 09:34 AM
1

The latter works fine for me. Life is not a zero-sum game. I don't view any person (myself included) as inherently superior or inferior to another.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 09:02 PM
2

You don't have to devalue others to value yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 07:23 PM
3

I don't know. No, you clearly don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 06:18 PM
4

Every single reply you've made to my posts has been you attempting to rationalize my success within the framework of TRP. Every single reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 06:09 PM
3

Either you're Jon Snow, or you're wrong about how the world works.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 06:08 PM
3

How do TRPers bitch about "hamstering and rationalization" and then pull tapdancing bullshit like this? Honestly, it blows my fucking mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 06:03 PM
3

Oh my god. Moron. Read my posts. I have dated people in all ranges of conventional attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 06:02 PM
5

5'9" is distinctly average, and there's no fucking way visibly muscular + visibly chubby == "Chad-level attractive". Come on, dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 06:00 PM
1

I was interested in your opinion on a hypothetical related situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 03:54 PM
2

Sure, go ahead and make up whatever the fuck you want that is completely unrelated to what she said. Have a blast.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 03:52 PM
1

Not sure what you're getting at.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 03:49 PM
4

Nope. I'm 5'9" and overweight with glasses and long hair, though I take care of myself and work out regularly so I'm visibly muscular. I'm involved with people of all different body types and backgrounds: strippers, models, programmers, gymnasts, poets, and so on. Try again!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 03:33 PM
3

yeahhh that's... not what I meant
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 04:49 AM
2

Oh yeah, there's definitely a correlation, but it's not causative. This is also why there's a higher ratio of people with controversial appearances (overweight, etc.) in such communities. Since there's an overarching sense of alienation from the public just from being interested in these subjects, it's more likely that enthusiasts are able to empathize with people unlike them. It's not universal obviously (the gut-wrenching trend of bisexual exclusion from LGBT spaces is a good counterexample), …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 03:28 AM
1

the former
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 03:09 AM
5

What in the world does mental illness have to do with it? I don't mind discussing it, but I can't even imagine how it's related.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 03:09 AM
6

average iq people have a tendency to lack objectivity Yes, they certainly do.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/16 12:02 AM
2

I don't know what you want here, man. I've had the same partner do a thing with me that no one else in their life has done with them, but decline to do something I really wanted which they'd done before. So by your rules they're simultaneously more attracted to me than everyone else they've fucked but also less attracted to me than at least one person they've previously fucked. If that works for you, go with it, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 11:17 PM
2

Yeah, that's why in one of my earlier comments in this thread I mentioned that I think her advice is shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 11:03 PM
1

My personal experience directly and repeatedly contradicts what you're saying. I have seen some situations where it's true, but for every one of those there is another where a partner is willing to try something with me that she had never tried before despite being asked (and in some cases has never let anyone try since me), but declined to do something else which she had previously done because she didn't like it or only did it because the previous partner really really really wanted it and it …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 10:56 PM
5

What a charmer.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 10:39 PM
4

Makes sense, I wouldn't want to talk to you about anything I actually wanted a useful perspective on either.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 10:31 PM
7

Alternatively, no one in your life trusts you enough to tell you about their shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 10:28 PM
5

I never said that. The women I end up staying involved with love that I'm submissive. Most of them just wish I enjoyed switching! "Submissive" in a kink context is not the same as "submissive" in a social context. They're polysemes--identical words with related but distinct meanings. When I say I'm "submissive", I'm making a statement about how I relate to certain partners with whom I share a special kind of chemistry. It has nothing to do with my day-to-day personality, which is generally boist…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 10:27 PM
7

Mainly "feminist" and "beta" just don't mean what TRPers think they mean. People see the tip of the iceberg because I say controversial things like "women deserve respect" and "men have some unfair advantages afforded by society" and they expand that into thinking I exhibit all of the other stereotypical "beta/feminist" traits, but I don't. I'm not a doormat or a self-hating man; I've had my own doubts and feelings about the feminist movement and my place in it; and I still get frustrated about …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 10:22 PM
3

I believe we are working with wildly different definitions of "quality". I prefer to associate with people who are confident, sexy, intelligent, compassionate, articulate, and unburdened by worthless cultural preconceptions. I have no idea exactly how sexual attraction works for me; all I know is that so far I've only ever apparently been attracted to cis women with nerd and/or health+fitness lifestyles, but ya never know.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 10:18 PM
1

It's cute that you think my submissiveness is how I attract women, but it's not. If anything most women are disappointed to discover that I'm exclusively submissive.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 10:13 PM
5

No. I'm into women. Some of my partners are fat, some aren't. I don't really give a shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 10:11 PM
6

Me. I am the TRP definition of a "feminist beta blooper" and I have an incredibly fulfilling sex and romance life in which the women I date literally recommend me to their friends and go out of their way to cater to my needs in and out of the bedroom whenever they can manage it (because, surprise, I do the same for them). But I don't have any scientific studies to corroborate my success, so most TRPers et al. just plug their ears and refuse to believe anything I say. I think it's worth noting th…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 09:54 PM
1

That's fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 09:45 PM
2

For some women this is indeed true, just not for any of the women I choose to associate with.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 09:41 PM
0

Yes, sometimes that is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 09:40 PM
1

Are you really just going to keep asking everyone in the thread this exact same question even though it's been answered already?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 09:38 PM
1

You're correct; attraction has more to do with confidence in personality than morals. But that's unrelated to whether you respect women. You can be confident and respect women, you can be not-confident and not-respect women, and everything in-between.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 09:33 PM
1

Except she's not saying that equality-minded men are stealing our jobs, she's saying that equality-minded men are worth devoting yourself to for the rest of your mortal lifespan. You're projecting the negative judgment on to them. She is telling women "fuck around with whoever you want, but don't commit to someone who doesn't respect you". There's just no way to torture this quote enough to support ABFB because it comes from an entirely different worldview.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 09:30 PM
3

Oh my god, man, take a fucking break. You're not even replying in the right comment thread anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 09:26 PM
3

The entire sum and substance of female behavior is what YOU have seen in YOUR life. Right-o. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 09:25 PM
0

Look dude, I'm not gonna try to convince you of something that you have no interest in understanding. If you decide to selectively ignore the things that conflict with your perspective, you can go on believing pretty much anything you want. I was discussing the quote in the OP. If you want to discuss it, feel free, but if you want to pretend that the parts of the quote that disagree with you don't "count", then what is the point of discussing it at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 09:24 PM
1

That is literally the exact opposite of what I'm saying. If you've seen behavior X and I've seen behavior Y, then it follows that the set of possible behaviors must include at least [X, Y]. If either of us claims to have a complete understanding of female behavior based on our individual experiences, we are wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 09:21 PM
1

Cool story. Still horrendously bad reality modeling.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 09:13 PM
2

I see! My experience has not resembled that. For my partners, the person using the toy matters more than the toy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 09:12 PM
1

Wrong. People on this sub keep telling me "look at women's actions and not their words". The women in my life drop men instantly when they reveal a lack of respect. I have seen it happen with my own eyes hundreds of times. These guys flake out, cheat, condescend, gaslight, tapdance, sulk, or throw a tantrum, and then they are gone. I could come up with a dozen examples from female friends/partners of mine just from the last couple of months alone. It's entirely possible that the women you know d…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 09:10 PM
2

She literally ends her quote by saying that "nothing is sexier" than a man who respects you as an equal. The exact opposite of what you just said.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 09:06 PM
5

So your main problem with the man in this story isn't that he hit an innocent woman, but that he cried?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 09:02 PM
1

Oh god yeah. The scarcity model will fuck you up.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 09:01 PM
1

I can't hear you over how loudly Bayes is shrieking in his grave.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 09:00 PM
2

Sorry, I was unclear. I fuck them too. Your guarantee is flagrantly incorrect. I've had somewhere between ten and thirty sex/kink partners in the last ten years, and every single one of them has verbally communicated their needs and desires to me, usually to some extent before we started fucking, and only once have I ever encountered a mismatch beyond what I've experienced with my own shifting desires. To reiterate, out of 10~30 women, literally one of them did anything resembling what you're ta…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:58 PM
4

Then why are you on a discussion forum about how to attract them?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:49 PM
1

You didn't answer my question.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:46 PM
1

It's interesting you put it that way, because I never "wanted" the relationships to end. Breaking up was always excruciating and full of fear and guilt and doubt for me. But I think that was mainly because of the perception we're given that you've "failed" if you break up. So, even though most of my breakups FELT like failures at the time, in retrospect, the failure was in the setup of the relationship itself, and the breakup was just an acceptance of that mismatch.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:45 PM
2

Yeah, that's a good point. After my first major breakup post-college, I blamed the other person entirely. Ironically, it was J (the drug abusing narcissist) who helped me come to terms with my part in what happened. (That was before our relationship turned toxic.)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:43 PM
5

So if most of the rape survivors I've met are more mentally stable than usual, and most of the rape survivors you've met are less, how do we decide whether your statement about "most" of them is correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:41 PM
0

I don't get out of bed for anything less than a Caramello!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:39 PM
1

I also think it's unfortunate that we're culturally conditioned to believe that the only successful relationship is one that ends with the death of a partner. I would say that many of my past relationships were very successful. They made me and my partners very happy for longer than they made us sad, and I learned many important lessons from each one. I don't see breakups as "failures", and I don't think it's particularly healthy or useful to see them that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:39 PM
2

The thing is, I only dated people who clearly respected me and wanted the best for me. So even when things were at their worst, it still always felt like we were struggling to make it work together. I've had maybe two relationships in my life that felt adversarial and they didn't last more than a few months once they got to that point. But I've never been cheated on, I've never been verbally abused by a partner except for one who I broke up with shortly after. So I guess the idea of mismatched r…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:36 PM
1

Yes, rape victims are MOSTLY mentally unstable and MOSTLY damaged goods. Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:30 PM
3

Say a couple's been dating for two years and they get engaged. They have a great relationship. A year into the engagement, weeks before the wedding, the man's best friend from childhood commits suicide. That week he flips out and slaps his fiancee, then immediately breaks down crying and apologizing. Should she walk away?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:28 PM
6

The point isn't to find the "best people in the world", it's to find the best people in the world for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:24 PM
9

"All that shit"? Dude, people are fucking train wrecks. All of them. If it's not rape, it's illness. If it's not illness, it's family issues. If it's not family issues, it's depression. Or career dissatisfaction. The idea that rape is some kind of emotional apocalypse that turns people into emotional energy vampires is dumbfoundingly misguided. Not only that, but a lot of people are fucking amazing, and the return on investment for dealing with their issues (rape or otherwise) is a fucking no-br…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:23 PM
2

I dunno, I guess dating doesn't involve a lot of commitment for her. I think her advice is kind of shit. None of the women I'm involved with would bother dating or fucking someone who doesn't respect them as an equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:14 PM
3

If a woman wants to fuck a bad boy, he's giving her his body as much as she's giving him hers.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:12 PM
1

Have you read the comments from redpillers here?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:08 PM
2

Most of my prior relationships lasted between 6 months and 2 years. I was always the one who did the dumping. I felt burnt out because I didn't get enough out of the relationships relative to what I put in. I grew up believing in the message "love is enough"; the idea that if you "truly love" someone, then the rest will just work itself out. It's total bullshit, of course, but it took me a few disasters to finally accept it. I dated people where EVERYTHING was great except for just ONE thing whi…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 08:07 PM
4

No reason for her to hide it. One of my partners couldn't orgasm without the use of a vibrator, so I just used it on her (or played with the rest of her body while she got herself off with it). I've also had partners whom I don't have PIV sex with because it's not something I feel comfortable doing without a romantic connection, so I use toys to fuck them all the time. As long as everyone's happy, who cares what kind of tools you use to get the job done?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 07:54 PM
2

Why not both?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 07:49 PM
2

Or he tried it and didn't like it. Or he just doesn't want to do that thing with you. "Attraction" is not some kind of linear scale. Sure it works that way for some people, but the idea that everyone works that way is just not supported by reality. You can decide to define "attraction" as "how much someone is willing to do with a partner", but that's a pretty uselessly limited definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 07:39 PM
2

I am a man and I have not noticed that despite predominantly hanging out with women for my entire adult life.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 05:04 PM
1

The fuck?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 05:01 PM
1

I'm glad you drew this distinction. I take a distinctly moderate stance on most of these political dichotomies (left/right, TRP/TBP et al.), but tend to be described by others as left/TBP/SJW. I subscribed and read the links, self-posts and discussion for several weeks; overall, I found that there was a decent ratio of reasonable discussion and healthy advice, but I still believe that the community encourages many overall harmful habits and perspectives. And frankly, comments like /u/betterdeadt…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 02:27 AM
1

Do you think that most people who criticize TRP would change their minds if they followed the subreddit for a few days?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 01:09 AM
2

Yes, that is the exact thing I was criticizing, thank you. It applies to humans in general, but it's a really dumb fucking reason to just ignore everything every woman says that doesn't mesh with your worldview.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 01:06 AM
0

Where are they getting it...?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 12:45 AM
2

"Lavish vacations and expensive gifts" are not the same as specific sex acts. If I brought a previous partner to Disneyland and I hated it, it would be ridiculous to say that I value future partners less because I won't go to Disneyland with them. Same goes with any specific kink.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 12:39 AM
2

There are women in this thread who have refuted this point. And please, don't give me the hand-wavey "actions not words" bullshit. Talk about rationalization. Some people are Just Not Into It, and the idea that a sufficiently hot partner will change that is like saying every guy would go gay for a sufficiently attractive man. You know what? Some would! And indeed, some women ARE more willing to experiment with certain things when their partner gets them more worked up. But for fuck's sake, pleas…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 12:34 AM
2

Edit: Very interested to know why folks are downvoting! If you can take a moment to articulate it, I'd appreciate the effort. "Performance" suggests some form of artifice, like you are pretending or acting. I don't see it that way, and I'm very happy with my station in life. Instead of seeing it as a "burden" which has been thrust upon you, take a step back and realize that it is only a fair exchange: if you want comfort, companionship, support, money, and respect from other people, you must pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 12:24 AM
1

I mean, best case scenario, it comes off as a lame and tasteless joke. Worst case scenario it just feeds the "TRP hates women" fire. What's the point?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 12:14 AM
-1

Thanks Shadow the Edgehog.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 12:12 AM
1

What in the world does that have to do with her question?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 11:55 PM
-1

The fuck?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 11:55 PM
2

I do my beta! I mean, my best. Not beta, obviously. I'm very alpha, you see. That was just a typo. Type with my pecs, you know how it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 01:31 AM
1

Not unless they want it to. It's just humans having fun with their bodies. It absolutely feels like a power exchange to me personally, but feelings are not universal reality; it doesn't work that way for everyone. Clearly it has a power connotation for you, too, and that's fine, but to assume that the connotation is universal is simply incorrect and unfounded.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 09:15 PM
3

Mishpochah!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 04:05 PM
3

Oh, gai kakhen afenyam!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 03:47 PM
2

(fans self) You have me all fuhrklempt now.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 03:26 PM
3

Sorry, after the "gas chambers" comment I kind of figured politeness had gone out the window.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 03:18 PM
3

I love it. "The alternative community", as if there was only one!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 02:58 PM
3

Right? The disconnect from reality is mind-boggling. Sometimes I wonder how these people manage to make it out of bed in the mornings. "Better not wake up with too much enthusiasm, or people will think I'm a special snowflake!"
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 02:47 PM
3

Most women out there would probably dump a guy if he asked them to fuck him in the ass with a strap on. They would run, seriously. Yes, and every single one of those women have been severely miseducated about how sex and power work.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 01:07 PM
1

Okey doke!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 05:49 AM
7

"Getting plowed"? "Face down ass up"? Neither of those things are intrinsic to pegging (or anal simulation in general). And you said yourself, it's feminine, but that's not the same as submissive.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 05:23 AM
2

Well, this is the thread to talk about it. Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 05:17 AM
7

It's adorable that you think pegging is something that Millennials just came up with recently.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 05:08 AM
7

I mean it's fine if ya don't want to try it, but it's kind of silly to think it has to involve plastic things and being bent over!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 05:02 AM
10

What's hilarious is that my post clearly stirred something in his head or he wouldn't have bothered replying to it. He got as far as "this does not mesh with my understanding of the world" and then pulled the fire alarm.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 04:32 AM
5

Guess I was ... (puts on sunglasses) Out of the bloop!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 04:26 AM
8

You know what they say: "Nothing exists unless at least a dozen double-blind studies have found that it appears with statistically significant abundance in all possible situations"! Nuance is for those pesky SJWs.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 04:25 AM
11

Thanks! Your worthless input has been duly noted.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 03:30 AM
5

Well I'm glad it makes sense to one of us, at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 03:24 AM
5

oh my god you didn't even read my posts closely enough to realize I'm a submissive male
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 02:49 AM
5

Argument? No, that implies that there is some form of communication taking place here. I've probably been pegged by more women than you've fucked, but, nah, you're sure you know what's actually going through their heads because... what, you read some articles on Breitbart or A Voice For Men? This isn't an argument. This is you embarassing yourself in front of a stranger. You're 25, man. You should know better by now. Get your sorry ass off of TRP forums and go meet some actual women, face-to-fac…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 02:37 AM
6

I'm sure there are many people for whom it's painful no matter how much prep goes into it, but I wouldn't want anyone to read this thread and think that lube is all it takes to do it right! Lube isn't enough; it also has to do with speed, size, stress, and a few other factors. Different strokes, indeed!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 02:28 AM
3

Wow. All right, man. Sorry you've been burned so badly. I hope things pick up for you someday soon.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 02:21 AM
6

Just out of curiosity, how old are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 02:15 AM
10

If anal hurts for that long after an encounter, there's a strong chance you're doing it wrong!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 02:13 AM
6

Wait... so it's cool for guys who are into guys to want it in the butt, but not guys who are into girls?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 02:08 AM
6

So your conclusion is that all of my friends are lying to me? Wow. Okay dude. That's an incredibly sad and lonely way to look at the world, but do what works for you, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 02:05 AM
3

Here you go, buddy. Just for you, I posted your bodice-ripper image and copied what you said about how women don't like submissive men to my Facebook wall. Literally every single comment in this screenshot is from a woman on my friends list: http://i.imgur.com/ZNRg8vH.png Sure are a lot of outliers in there, huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 01:33 AM
4

Who gives a fuck if they're statistically significant? They exist! That's all that matters. If you talk about them like they don't exist or don't matter, you are plainly wrong. There's nothing more to it than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 10:41 PM
11

I don't really know what point you're trying to make here, dude. If you're going to make a vapid statement about "ALL FEMALE-ORIENTED AND CREATED EROTICA" but you don't even know enough about the subject to be aware of Archive of Our Own, a massive repository of (often erotic) fan-fiction with almost a million contributors and god knows how many regular readers who are VERY passionate about non-traditional depictions of sexuality, then I am going to mock you for it because you are talking comple…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 10:10 PM
6

Er... yes, you are. This is you right here, saying that all human sexuality operates according to your understanding even though you've apparently never even heard of slash fiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 09:27 PM
5

Are you kidding? This guy is the most fun I've had in a comment thread in weeks. You don't find someone this dense every day!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 09:20 PM
7

No, your grid of fifteen bodice-ripper covers has bested me outright. That's airtight. Incontrovertible proof of universal dominant male sex appeal.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 09:16 PM
11

What makes it inherently submissive?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 09:12 PM
15

Aren't you the same guy from elsewhere in the thread who's never even hear of AO3 yet claims to have a universal understanding of female sexuality?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 09:09 PM
27

There is an astonishing amount of misconception wrapped up in this issue. Not only is submission conflated with weakness, but penetration itself is conflated with submission. It is objectively true that many people feel submissive when being penetrated. It is objectively true that many people look down on their partners for being submissive. However, that does not mean these feelings are universal, nor that the judgment is rational. Being penetrated is not inherently submissive, by any reasonabl…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 09:00 PM
10

This is what I don't get... why are your anecdotes universal but OP's anecdotes are not? Isn't it possible that it works for some people and not for others, like basically everything else in the world?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 08:38 PM
3

The only people who think acting like a douchebag is "asserting dominance" are the douchebags making excuses for their asinine, juvenile behavior, dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 12:24 AM
3

yes, you are free to interpret things incorrectly if that is what's in your heart of hearts
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/15 06:39 PM
3

the whole fucking point of that scene was that Cypher preferred the illusory pleasures of the blue pill world, at least be consistent goddammit
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/15 05:40 PM
1

His points require absolutely nothing beyond basic deductive reasoning to understand. If you find them that confusing, you should probably sit down and learn rudimentary logic before purporting to be capable of debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 09:21 AM
3

Ironically, Sorkin wrote this in the context of President Bartlet advising President Obama in a dream to get angry at intolerant people with ugly views about women and foreign countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/15 04:22 AM
2

I feel no urge to bother with the arguments you have presented, and I am generally open to debate virtually anyone Anyone except the person who you were replying to, for no readily apparent reason...????
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/15 04:18 AM
1

Did you reply to the wrong thread? The OP I'm looking at has a quote advising people to emotionally abuse their SO's to manipulate them into getting abortions. What does that have to do with a man's sexual needs? Sorry if this is daft, I'm just very confused about what you're referring to.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/15 01:20 AM
3

I would say no, as straight women consume much less porn than straight or gay men. The vast majority of porn is made by, and marketed towards, men. Women are culturally discouraged from embracing their sexuality; it's assumed that men jerk off and watch porn, but considered exceptional when women do it. Take a look at this photo shoot of Chris Evans, and the accompanying description. Men are not frequently depicted like this in media, even though most women would conclude that it's very sexy. I …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/15 01:14 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter