brahlicious Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
92	$10,000,000 for women's court advocacy. $600,000 to help men address their violence. Why can't they remove gender from this.	Discrimination	brahlicious	/r/MensRights	15/05/18 03:25 AM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
37	Consent? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1949079/ "1% at the age of 16 years, still had non-retractile foreskins"	/r/MensRights	13/07/18 02:43 AM
57	Consent? 99% of uncircumcised men don't have a problem tho.	/r/MensRights	13/07/18 02:33 AM
1	$10,000,000 for women's court advocacy. $600,000 to help men address their violence. Why can't they remove gender from this. A fanatic? What am I a fanatic of? I'm simply pointing out sexist government policy/funding.	/r/MensRights	16/05/18 09:02 AM
1	$10,000,000 for women's court advocacy. $600,000 to help men address their violence. Why can't they remove gender from this. Your work at a charity has nothing to do with this. This is the NSW government and their sexist funding.	/r/MensRights	16/05/18 07:46 AM
1	$10,000,000 for women's court advocacy. $600,000 to help men address their violence. Why can't they remove gender from this. Charity is completely different from government. People can donate to what they want. Taxes are compulsory and to use those funds on a sexist policy is completely unacceptable.	/r/MensRights	16/05/18 07:42 AM
2	$10,000,000 for women's court advocacy. $600,000 to help men address their violence. Why can't they remove gender from this. It's not equality, it's unfair and sexist to offer a service that affects both genders to only one of them despite one being a majority. Men are the majority victims of suicide, should we make lifeline or other services exclusively for men because they are the majority?	/r/MensRights	16/05/18 06:51 AM
2	$10,000,000 for women's court advocacy. $600,000 to help men address their violence. Why can't they remove gender from this. So men in the same situation don't deserve help? Yes women are the majority of victims but there are still male victims so why should they be excluded for no reason I can think of.	/r/MensRights	16/05/18 06:17 AM
3	$10,000,000 for women's court advocacy. $600,000 to help men address their violence. Why can't they remove gender from this. You said it yourself, it's not exclusive to women. So what is the reason for making it only available to women? It's literally sexist.	/r/MensRights	16/05/18 01:04 AM
2	$10,000,000 for women's court advocacy. $600,000 to help men address their violence. Why can't they remove gender from this. EVERYONE should take responsibility for their crimes. ALL victims of domestic abuse should receive financial assistance if required, why is that service cut off from men?	/r/MensRights	16/05/18 12:53 AM
23	$10,000,000 for women's court advocacy. $600,000 to help men address their violence. Why can't they remove gender from this. New South Wales (Australian state) 17-18 budget excerpt.	/r/MensRights	15/05/18 03:26 AM