TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

brassbuffalo Archive

View 0 posts and 979 comments by brassbuffalo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Forgiveness is not forgetting.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/26 04:36 PM
3

You said social darwinsm. Yeah, the racist psuedoscience loved by Nazis is evil. You're advocating for evil things.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/26 05:23 PM
3

I don't believe in social darwinism. I'm just pointing your evil rhetoric at you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/26 04:49 PM
1

So, good people can't be dumb? Or be mislead? Or overlook someone's bad tendencies for any number of reasons? Birds? I've only ever heard scottish people call women birds.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/26 04:17 PM
7

Morals isn't in the equation. They were chasing guys who treated them poorly, not murderers. Also, real people are complicated. It's not black and white.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/26 03:40 PM
11

I've had friends that chased after hot guys that were shitty. They were good people. It's not true that only shitty people go after shitty people.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/26 03:28 PM
5

"Mother nature doesn't care about your fee-fees" It's safe to say mother nature doesn't give a shit about patriarchy or being cruel to women either. So, we should just remove women's rights entirely if we're going to be social darwinists. Sexual selection and natural selection are different things. This sub is flooded by mouthbreathers who didn't pay attention in biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/26 01:30 PM
3

That's the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/26 01:56 AM
1

A pocket pussy can't awkwardly pat my back and say "it's okay" while I sulk because I came too fast. Clearly they are not better.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/26 01:38 AM
6

And? What you're proposing goes against a man's civil liberties.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/26 01:36 AM
23

With regards to your last point, the manosphere isn't making women into lesbians any more than feminism is making men gay. That's a ludicrous idea. There has been a dramatic shift in how LGBTQ view people are viewed in society. Remember that in 2008 Obama did not publicly support gay marriage. By 2012 gay marriage was on the democrat national platform. The increase in people identifying as not straight was preceded by a massive increase in LGBTQ acceptance across the US. The most likely cause is…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/26 01:31 AM
3

His tummy don't jiggle jiggle, it folds.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/26 04:09 PM
5

First, men not going to singles mixxers is not evidence of an insecurity crisis. There's a big leap in logic to get to that conclusion. Second, I've seen the exact opposite. Singles mixxers in the Bay Area are often mostly men, from what I've exerienced and what others have told me.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/26 06:14 AM
14

"tax benefits". Most countries on Earth that have tax benefits for married couples did not introduce those benefits until after WW2. You should do more research before making a post like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/26 09:26 PM
1

Don't back down now, call me an 8 year old girl. Otherwise, what was the point of ever denying it?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/26 03:20 PM
1

Could means it's possible, not that it's true or that I agree. This is pretty basic reasing comprehension. "You should find it weird that a man still wants to be 12" What a strange fiction you've invented from nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/26 02:57 PM
1

I wasn't chill with it. I was arguing that you were wrong the entire time. Then you showed your hand that you partake in shaming men's masculinity that you continue to say doesn't happen. You showed yourself as a liar
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/26 02:43 PM
1

"The fact you would have been okay with these GROWN ASS MEN being compared to 12 year old boys says alot." If you compared them to boys or children it would be an insult of immaturity. You chose girls. Insulting a man's masculinity by comparing him to a little girl is toxic masculinity in action. You're not calling them immature, you're calling them not manly.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/26 02:31 PM
1

You're using 12 year old girl as an insult. Clearly you think there's something insulting about comparing a man to a girl. You clearly think masculine shaming is effective. Your "don't give a fuck" spiel is a lie. You do give a fuck about gender norms and you think othets should "they're acting like children who wanna sit at the cool kids table" Liar. If you had sais "12 year old" this could be true, but you didn't. You said 12 year old girl. You aren't comparing them to gender neutral children,…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/26 01:33 AM
1

A user here says it in almost every daily thread
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 11:28 PM
1

"A man choosing to act like a 12 year-old girl is a personal choice of his" "It’s a self-inflicted problem by men who still think like 12-year-old little girls." Calling men 12 year-old little girls is a masculine shaming attempt. You've done what you've been saying doesn't happen. You chose girl over boy for a reason. Right now you are trying to shame men into acting how you want by calling their masculinity into question. You also believe it works, or you would not have done that. You have dem…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 03:50 PM
1

https://www.queerty.com/why-do-masculine-gay-guys-look-down-on-feminine-guys-20140707/ What do you mean "desperate for validation". Are you such a sociopath that something like the desire to fit in is some kind of selfish deviant behavior? If you ever listened to me in the multiple times we've had this argument, you'd remember that feminists fought hard for 150 years to change gender roles for women. You can do everything you described and still be considered feminine, and still easily fit in. Y…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 02:57 PM
1

Wow, a straight answer. Thank you. LBGTQ people are still influenced by gender norms. Societal norms and standards influence how we act, often at an unconcious level. You can reject them and still be influenced. Cisgender heternormative norms and expectations influence LGBTQ spaces. From the link: "There is a definite prejudice towards men who use femininity as part of their palate; their emotional palate, their physical palate. Is that changing? It's changing in ways that don't advance the caus…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 11:11 PM
1

It seems like you're saying that gay people existing in large numbers means gender norms don't matter. Is that what you're actually claiming? You just utterly refuse to clearly state what you actually believe. You never answer questions, you never clarify what you actually think. Do you think you can be specific this time?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 10:03 PM
1

You're still denying it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 08:46 PM
1

You deny it and justify it at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 08:42 PM
2

You started by denying that people try to use gender roles to pressure men into being emotionless. You seem to have totally abandoned that in favor of "I don't give a fuck if they are". Can I get a clear answer from you? Do you believe that gender roles and toxic masculinity have zero effect on men's emotional expression, and that they're just whiny? Or, do you believe they do, but you don't care and just think they're whiny? Take a stance. I'm not arguing with someone who changes what they beli…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 08:28 PM
1

First and foremost, you dodged my question. Are you arguing that there is no societal pressure against men, or that you don't care if there is? "1 in 5 Zoomers are LGBT. Not giving a fuck has been a popular option." 1 in 5 zoomers are publiclly LGBTQ because it's more socially accepted than ever in US history thanks to 50+ years of activism working to achieve that. It's not that zoomers don't give a fuck, it's that zoomers don't have to worry about being socially ostracized like previous generat…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 07:33 PM
1

They are told they aren't men if they aren't emotionless. Are you going to deny that societal pressures affect men's emotional expression, or are you going to argue you don't give a shit that societal pressures affect men? You're trying to do both right now. You seem incapable of arguing in good faith. I laid out a feminist argument for how patriarchal gender norms dictate what emotions are acceptable, and you think it's the same thing as a right winger ranting about how feminists hate masculini…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 06:38 PM
1

It's very simple, these reasons are not directed at heterosexual men. The mirror image of slut shaming women is slut shaming men, not just bisexual men. It's a stigma directed exclusively at a sexual minority. That's why it's homophobia.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 04:38 PM
2

"it’s just a lot of guys don’t think behaving like an adult is masculine." After all this time you still manage to impress me with how wrong you can interpret my words. It's almost the opposite of what I wrote. I pretty explicitly said that not showing emotion is seen as masculine, which is also what you think is acting like an adult. It's quite clear that you're part of the problem. "Then why is it mainly brought up in manosphere spaces?" It isn't. You won't find a single big name influencer ta…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 04:12 PM
0

"The same applies to “men aren’t allowed to show emotion.” Most young people (in the West atleast) arent demanding that men become emotionless. People just don’t want to deal with adults who express every negative emotion through rage, hostility, self-pity, sexual entitlement, or meltdowns." You're far from the mark. Anger is one of the few emotions men can have without risking people seeing them as less masculine, and the only negative emotion with no risk. When some lunatic throws a chair duri…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 03:32 PM
1

I can walk into any game store in America and experience it every day.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/26 09:58 PM
10

Wow, I should have checked her post history cause you're dead on the money. In the 4 different subs she posted about this in she has refused to seriously discuss it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/26 08:40 PM
11

Anytime someone does something that goes against their beliefs it's worth questioning if they really hold those beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/26 07:01 PM
9

Sure, if you're rejecting someone. That's not what's happening here, and beside the point. There IS a reason. There is something that makes a woman see a man differently when she learns he's bisexual. You can say "I don't have to tell you" but that doesn't change the fact that there is a reason. Every single time this song and dance happens the reasons all end up being the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/26 06:55 PM
11

Why is the woman turned off when she learns a man is bisexual? I noticed you didn't provide a reason. It's homophobia. Maybe there's another reason, I've never seen it and I'm not confident one exists. I've had this argument too often so I'm gonna take a different approach. If women said "yeah, it's homophobic. Deal with it" then there would be no discussion or argument. Very few people are actually saying you have a moral obligation to date bisexual men, that's not the argument. The problem is …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/26 06:39 PM
3

The 18-21 BMI guy
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/26 03:45 PM
2

At 58 minutes in this video the guy argues that men who respect women are the most attractive. Is he lying or wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/26 12:51 AM
2

Right, but that was a temporary issue, and for a man you were already married to. Would you start a relationship with a guy knowing he'd never spend any money on you and you may need to provide for him?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 06:14 PM
4

"Would you stay with your husband if he temporarily lost his job?" is a different question than "would you date men if they would never spend a single cent on the relationship?" OP includes shared living expenses in the things these hypothetical men would never spend money on.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 05:24 PM
2

What are 22% of men doing that counts as providing?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 05:15 PM
1

Dodged the first point again. "Not enough to be seen as a good father" It's easy to say they don't meet the standard when you don't define the standard. It can be whatever you want so you're never wrong. You argue to use your brain when dating but your definitions seems to be based on vibes. "I actually have proof" You don't. A youtube channel about other people's misery primarily attracts people who want to enjoy someone else's suffering. Yet even in your sociopath bait channel, there's highly …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 05:11 PM
1

As I've pointed out, someone emotionally abusive enough drive his wife and child several states away is not a good father, even by the standards of the 60s and 70s. All 3 people I named have had consistent income, have never been charged with a crime, and pay all their bills. You've already agreed that's enough to be considered responsible. "Not with stupid people" Let me use the same rebuttal you just used: Nuh-uh.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 03:43 PM
1

Dodge the point and run away if you want. Well the only method of selecting fir good fathers that you have brought up is responsibility. I think each of those men have proven they have that. So "vetting against shitty baby daddys" seems to be a lot less cut and dry then you're presenting People do sympathize. You don't because you don't feel empathy
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 03:26 PM
1

Do you think most men in the 1960s got divorced and had their ex take their child and flee to another state? It was actually rare to get divorced back then, so it's demonstrably not true to say he wasn't out of the ordinary. I'm not sure why you've decided to draw the line in the sand on defending the parenting skills of an emotionally abusive old man you don't know. I think it's obvious if responsibility was the only or the primary thing selected for that each of those men fit the bill. It's be…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 02:42 PM
–

All men are bad, and all women are men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 02:15 PM
1

How much detail do you need? Why do the details even matter in this example? At this point you're just distracting from the point. I would think Elon's two ex-wives and Grimes cared at some point. Plus there's still Steve Jobs and Brad Pitt. Really I could start going down a roster of celebrities and rich jerks. You're dodging the point by only talking about one part. Responsibility does not prove you will be a good parent. https://youtu.be/UnruebBYPo4?si=yEUhsax9qrD-huwR These videos are clickb…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 02:14 PM
1

If you have no rebuttal, you could just say so instead of this lame copout.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 04:49 AM
1

There's infidelity and betrayal in both cases. In both cases the person learns their partner had a child with someone else. However, in the man's situation, the affair child is one he thought was his own. Like I said, the woman doesn't have to worry that the affair partner is gonna sue for custody. The woman will never have to reckon with the fact that her child isn't hers, and that the child she loves has become a permanent reminder of infidelity. I'm not undermining the pain, I'm showing how t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 04:21 AM
1

And yet, it's the example you chose. You found a guy exhibiting symptoms of malnutrition and drug abuse and said it was all genetics. I expected to see a guy with bug eyes or tiny eyes, a terrible jawline, and bad symmetry. Instead I saw a crackhead with a fivehead. My issue is with the idea that a rich person wouldn't look like that, and I stand by my original claim that three years on the streets would have any rich person looking like that or worse. Weird side note: I googled genetically ugly…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 04:07 AM
2

Like I said, those situations are not equivalent. Women don't have to worry that the child that they thought was theirs is actually another woman's child. Women don't have to worry that they're going to spend years of their life loving a child, only to find out it's not theirs and then lose that child to the real mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 03:31 AM
2

The guy in the picture you shared looks like any random crackhead. You call it "genetically unattractive" but it looks like the results of drug abuse, hard labor, bad diets, poor sleep, exposure, and general bodily abuse. Your example of "genetically unattractive" is what any human will look like after severe drug abuse and homelessness. The idea that rich people will never look like that has some truth, in that if they get to the point where they look like that they've lost all their money. You…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 03:19 AM
2

Take an upper-class and wealthy person and get them addicted to meth and living on the street and they'll look like that in 3 years, tops. Barring severe genetic deformities, the ugliest people are the result of hardship born of crippling poverty.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 01:49 AM
2

What's this about selling fruits on the street? She was working as a model in Paris when she met her first husband (not the son of the billionaire).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 01:43 AM
3

Women very rarely end up raising a kid that's not theirs due to infidelity. Barring hospital and IVF mistakes, no woman has raised a kid thinking it was hers when it wasn't. It's not the same
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 01:35 AM
2

All-Alaskan pig racing. They travel along the county/state fair circuit. It's pretty fun to watch.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 01:32 AM
1

I think I saw that goth girl acting cringey on a scripted youtube dating show. She's moving up in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 01:29 AM
0

Maybe I'd date but I wouldn't be pursuing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 01:23 AM
22

I don't need to go on dates to make new friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 01:08 AM
1

My paternal Grandpa was an example of a good father. He was just as responsible, without terrorizing his children. So no, terrorizing your wife and child until they run away to another state was not considered a good father 50 years ago. Steve Jobs, Elon Musk, and Brad Pitt are examples of modern responsible men who are terrible parents. You want more? If the best I have to say is that you're not disgusting, than you are unattractive. To respond to your other comment: "It shows people don’t symp…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 01:03 AM
1

Romance scams are pretty irrelevant. Elderly people fall for phishing emails, "grandma I need bail money" scams, fake amazon/microsoft/google/etc customer service scams and plenty more. It's immaterial to what we should prioritize in a romantic relationship. Also, most humans are sympathetic to people who have been taken advantage of. Look at the comments on this video. Your callous disregard to scam victims has me doubting your empathy. If you're low empathy it makes sense for you to disregard …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/26 10:12 PM
1

As a human you're expected to have emotions. Those emotions are also the primary reason we seek out relationships. Love is irrational. Embrace that. If you read the rest of that paragraph you'd have seen that the point was that it's not hard to find good looking people in the US. Even with 70% of the country being overweight, you're spoiled for choice in comparison to a place like India, China, or Russia. Responible doesn't actually equal good parent, it theoretically makes it more likely. My gr…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/26 09:21 PM
1

“omg, youre so hot, I dont think with my brain. I think with my genitals” Love is an emotion, so is desire. People want an emotional connection, not some purely rational compatability measurement. People aren't assembly line products. We want people to want us because of how they feel, not because of a spreadsheet cost-benefit analysis. "Most people arent that good looking, especially in America." This isn't super important but I think it's weird you'd single out America. Even with our absurd ob…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/26 08:27 PM
7

Whether or not that's true is irrelevant. Teenagers are taking illegal and dangerous drugs to get in shape. Body positivity never included male bodies.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/26 06:16 PM
8

Steroid usage among teen boys has risen dramatically. The body positivity movement did nothing for men, and now we have people like Clavicular running around. The kids aren't safe.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/26 02:57 PM
–

Did Lilith get banned or is she just stockpiling shitposts for the winter?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/26 12:06 AM
1

You can get used to a lot of things, including tragedy. We're built to adapt.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/26 08:32 PM
4

So then argue for that, not this paying people to not work.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/26 07:49 PM
22

Giving up work to be a homemaker is a choice, and in the present day it's a choice mostly excercised by people with more money. Why should we subsidize people, who are probably wealthy, to voluntarily leave the workforce? If tbe problem is divorce, alimony exists. It's a problem that's been solved.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/26 07:25 PM
2

""Reporting what someone else said" doesn't magically make it not an accusation. Why is first-person "reporting the sexual assault that happened to me" any different? Why is the introduction of hearsay somehow magically make the information non-accusatory? This reasoning makes fuck-all sense." It's fucking simple. You're not making an accusation, you're factually reporting what someone else said. This is incredibly simple. You're obstinate and generally unpleasant today so you can rant on your o…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 11:42 PM
4

"I'm not "mad" about anything you've said, nothing you could write could ever matter that much to me dude." Could've fooled me "If a guy rapes me and I talk about it, that is reality." How does anyone else know you're telling the truth? Are we just going on "this is my truth" kind of logic? What's your standard for what you believe and don't believe? Do you believe someone who says aliens abducted them? Do you believe someone who says they saw bigfoot? Do you believe someone who says they could'…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 11:20 PM
2

Blogs and commenters can be sued, if they're big enough to cause harm and you can prove they caused harm. I can say Dave Grohl killed my cat because this comment cannot possibly cause him harm. If I said "Fiftypoundpuppy killed my cat" and then your boss figured out your reddit account and fired you because you're a cat killer, you could sue me. I know anyonymous sources can be used, I pointed that out with "a source close to J Lo". You may have noticed the unnamed source. The point there is tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 09:52 PM
2

I chose that example because it was objectively false. You're mad that you were wrong. MeToo is specifically about it being public. It was this small private thing before people started writing op-eds. There's no point in discussing MeToo if we're not talking about MeToo. How do you know it happened? Is the claim enough for you to believe? You seem to think if someone says it happened, it did. What's the standard for truth? Your accusation does not prove material reality either. Courts actually …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 09:35 PM
5

Gossip magazines always claim to have a source. They never say "J Lo spits on children" they say "a source close to J Lo says she spits on children". That's how gossip magazines avoid defamation suits. News Sources always use "allegedly" when talking about people charged of crimed to avoid defamation. If your accusation results in some form of Harm to Tony, he can sue you for defamation. If you have proof, the case probably won't even go to trial. If you have zero proof it's not far-fetched to i…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 08:50 PM
9

Yes, that specific example, its your example after all. You specifically described accusing someone and but said it wasn't an accusation. You frame this whole conversation with the context of the MeToo movement, but then act like we aren't talking about public accusations. The Court of Public Opinion is relevant. YOU made this post about MeToo. MeToo was about public accusations and accountability. It wasn't about quietly warning your peers. "It doesn't take a police report to relay a factual re…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 08:30 PM
1

Your numbers rely on the idea that a majority or a large minority of bisexual and heteroflexible women are in relationships with women. This is funny because I constantly hear from Lesbians about how bisexual women always end up in relationships with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 06:51 PM
11

"...if Crackhead Craig steals my lawn furniture, I am free to go around and discuss the fact that Crackhead Craig stole my lawn furniture and no one bats an eye. That's not an "accusation" per se, that is me factually relaying a life experience." That is explicitly an accusation. You are accusing Crackhead Craig of robbing you. The reason it should go through a court of law is because there are standards of evidence. There are no standards of evidence in the court of public opinion. The accusati…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 06:38 PM
7

If an individual's recounting of their own lives names someone and accuses them of something, it opens the possibility of defamation suits. The word "factually" is doing some heavy lifting. If you don't want a defamation suit you need proof of your experiences, or you need to avoid naming people.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 06:01 PM
2

I vaguelly recall fellow PPD denizen Axis writing something similar to this list.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 10:32 PM
2

In no order A Few Good Men Rain Man Collateral Tropic Thunder Eyes Wide Shut
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 10:30 PM
1

Aren't you dating a 22 year old?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 04:04 PM
3

Come to the defense of your fellow cradle robbers?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 02:54 PM
1

I like when Toph tells her own mother "I am Toph Beifong". Peak netflix dialogue
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 12:19 AM
1

He's a vicious racist and he's always on the hunt for a way to insult minorities, even if it barely makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 12:16 AM
9

It amuses me how the group of women that claims "it's obvious looks are important" and the group of women who claim "looks don't matter" both act like the other group doesn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 12:13 AM
–

Finance guys have the social savy to know that an in depth explanation of their wealth management model is not fun at parties. Tech bros don't have the social savy to know when to shut up about AI at parties.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 11:41 PM
–

Tech is shitty for dating. I don't know how you can live in the US and not know about the bad reputation of men in tech. I live in the Bay Area and routinely see single's mixerss with a "No Tech People" disclaimer. Tech has always been filled with socially awkward nerds, weirdos, and self-absorbed jerks. One of the reasons for tech exclusions from singles mixers is because tech people have a bad habit of acting like tech is the most important thing in the world, and no one outside of tech wants …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 11:11 PM
–

They are. You wouldn't hear women whining about the bar being in hell if thwy were all doing fine
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 10:49 PM
1

Average males sued trans women? Like all of us against all of them? Was it a class action suit?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 05:32 PM
1

What documentary?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 07:09 PM
2

Makes you wonder, doesn't it? <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 07:08 PM
2

This thread has given me the horrible realization that "average" is the new "literally". The way most people use it has nothing to do with the word's meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 07:05 PM
2

I doubt your ability to comprehend much outside yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 07:01 PM
2

We don't agree. You're still using mid wrong. I also guarantee you could put Ryan Gosling in a lineup with a randon cross section of 25 year old men and a <25 woman would consider him more attractive than most of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 06:38 PM
1

You're using average completely wrong. It doesn't mean "not personally attractive to me". It means average, middle of the road, basic, mid. You should learn what words mean. Average celebrity attractive is a reasonable claim, and a correct usage of "average". I disagree, but whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 06:15 PM
3

Average compared to who? 70% of the people where you live are overweight, and half of that mumber is obese. By nature of being in good shape he's more attractive than 70% of the men you see on a daily basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 06:09 PM
2

You get it when people call Margot Robbie mid? When I see a guy say stuff like that I assume he's a terminally online nutjob. Put Margot Robbie and Ryan Gosling in any office/jobsite in the country and they're probably the hottest people in the building. Did you see the Barbie movie? Neither Ryan nor Margot peaked 10 years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 06:03 PM
1

I don't think you know what average means. All three men are well above average. If you're the least exceptional person in a group of exceptional people, you're still exceptional.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 05:56 PM
1

☕️ <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 03:32 PM
–

Thank you Dr. Bondepart. Your armchair psychology is almost as good as your film critique. I suppose I'll have to end our telehealth sessions now
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 03:08 PM
–

Well you don't know basic human emotion so you probably don't recognize humor when you see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 02:55 PM
–

I'm not surprised you have no idea what basic human emotion is.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 02:22 PM
2

This is a goomba fallacy moment but also I've never seen anyone say those things. Sounds made up.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 02:22 PM
4

You have bad grammar and it makes segments of what you write incomprehensible. "In Afghanistan, women comprised of 30% of rape victims, while men comprised of 1%, in the military." It sounds like men and women combined is 31% of rape victims. Your use of commas is consistently incorrect and it changes the meaning of your sentences in ways you probably don't intend.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 01:59 PM
3

Saying no to the date. If all you've got is rejections, a woman offering poor conversation on a date is a big improvement
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 01:40 PM
2

https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/6TNauLtXaR It seems like other women feel differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 01:21 PM
4

You have to scroll past like 60 comments to find that comment. You're digging for coal.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 05:30 AM
–

I don't think you understand basic human emotions. Ellen is afraid of Count Orlock, and Count Orlock is just horny. It's not romantic. Did you watch obsession and think it's romantic? Your compass is so far from normal you probably did.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 08:12 PM
–

I remember in Pride and Prejudice when Mr. Darcy bought Elizabeth with a fraudulent contract and then bragged that he owned her. Who could forget the scene where Mr. Darcy brutally murders Lydia and Wickham to pressure Elizabeth into meeting him. Ah, so romantic 😍. I especially like the scene where Mr. Darcy tells Elizabeth he doesn't care about her or anything except satisfying his own desires. I love a man who knows what he wants 😤 Jokes aside, Nosferatu groomed Ellen when she was a vulnerable…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 07:46 PM
–

You are changing it. You claimed a character fell in love with Nosferatu. Then you switched and claimed women thought Nosferatu was hot, and when I pointed out the problem, you dropped it and switched to romance. It was a sexual movie. You could call it a horny movie. It wasn't romantic, unless you think Epstein was a hopeless romantic. Do you think it's romantic for an old rich man to pursue lonely teenage girls? Count Orlok even says it has nothing to do with love "I am an appetite". Are you p…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 07:03 PM
3

You don't know that. You feel that way, and you assume most women feel the same. Maybe if you actually went to a gym instead of relying stories of your ex's terrible friends you'd have a different mindset.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 06:40 PM
2

Still dodging. You know what I meant. You're arguing semantics instead of the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 06:23 PM
–

Change the subject when you're cornered. Let me take some romance notes from Casanova Nosferatu. Stalk your ex to another country and murder her neighbors until she lets you have sex with her. Very romantic 🥰
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 05:40 PM
–

Were they? Or were they just having fun playing up an exaggerated persona? https://collider.com/nosferatu-count-orlok-hot/ Articles like this are funny, but there's a very tongue-in-cheek tone. That same tone was in every tiktok I saw about it too. It's a tone similar to the one where people said "Sony, we all loved Morbius. Bring it back into theaters" Besides, you didn't claim women found Orlock attractive, you said a women fell in love with him. That's bullshit. It's a grooming story that end…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 05:17 PM
1

Yet you feel comfortable making objective statements about Jacob Elordi. He's not ugly. It's a pale Jacob Elordi with scars. He looks like the Engineers from Prometheus. You watched Nosferatu and thought she fell in love? You didn't see a powerful old man manipulating a vulnerable and inexperienced young woman? You saw a girl get groomed and thought she fell in love. Also, Nosferatu is not a good hearted monster, so that doesn't fit the rest of your thesis.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 04:12 PM
1

I know you think he's ugly, but you stated that as objective fact not an opinion before I called you out. "The monster part is what is important" Unless you're into monsterfucker smut, this is a ludicrous statement, yet you made it. You didn't say his good heart is what mattered, you said the monster is what mattered. Like I said, full of shit. Esmerelda doesn't fall in love with Quasimodo. Even you aren't saying Quasimodo is attractive. Whereas Elizabeth falls for the monster, and you along wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:54 PM
1

Your "insight" is just you making stuff up. There's reason women thirst over Frankenstein Elordi and not Quasimodo. Also you didn't say "I think Jacob Elordi is awful". You said "Jacob Elordi is not hot" and later "He's so ugly and smug". Now that I've called you out you're making opinion statements, but before that you were making factual claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:35 PM
1

Really? Cause in your other comments in this thread you seem to suggest women all feel attraction the same. I think you're trying to sound more reasonable by taking a much softer position than you had earlier.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:14 PM
1

You're not speaking for yourself, you're trying to speak for all women. You're also representing opinion statements as facts
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 03:00 PM
1

He's not ugly by an metric. Neither you or I know him but I get the feeling you think he's smug because of the characters he plays. You don't speak for anyone but yourself, stop acting like your opinions are widespread.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:51 PM
1

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2026/feb/11/is-jacob-elordi-really-the-hottest-man-on-the-planet-six-things-you-need-to-know https://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2024/01/jacob-elordi-snl/677209/ You're full of shit tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:41 PM
2

You used "technically" because you know the colloquial definition is someone who avoids social situations. That was a lame attempt to dodge my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:35 PM
3

It is true. Go tell Axis_Control she's wrong if you think it's not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:33 PM
2

Antisocial people like you don't get to define social standards. You also do not speak for all or even a majority of women. Gyms ARE social spaces, the idea that you should keep to yourself at the gym is part of why most people are lonelier than people in the past. People like you are afraid of the most minor social discomforts and would eliminate social spaces if it meant you could avoid that, consequences be damned.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:14 PM
2

Lol. Lmao even.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 04:56 AM
2

In the new Spiderchud movie Peter Parker gets cucked by his oneitis and has an incel crashout. He spends most of the movie in a blackpill rage trying to hurt the women who have wronged him. He eventually learns the only way to defeat Stacy is to embrace the whitepill and stop despairing over his genetics. This summary/spoiler was brought to you by a showerthought where I imagined Spiderman as if he was the chudjak. Billions must be webbed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 12:33 AM
3

Women who hate on cargo shorts deserve pants and dresses with no pockets
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 12:21 AM
1

Why did you feel like you had to hang out? You're offended this guy doesn't want to be your friend but you only meet with him because you feel pressured into it. You're offended that he doesn't want to be your friend but you aren't describing him like someone you wish was your friend. Honestly it feels like you're offended that a guy you see as beneath you wants to date you. This whole thing is also extrapolating nationwide trends from one guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 12:20 AM
1

He's a clanker
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/26 06:53 PM
1

You might say that you've formed an Obsession for this movie.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/26 06:40 PM
4

It's been proven that you make bad faith arguments, so it's only obvious to liars and delusional people.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/26 06:39 PM
1

What does "focus on compatability" even mean? How do you imagine that working?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/26 04:13 AM
4

Advice is often offered freely without being asked for. This is true for everything, not just dating. They aren't getting an expensive service for free. People want to give advice, probably more than people want to receive it. This isn't an actual problem, you're just making shit up for a post on PPD. Your time isn't valuable, you're using it to argue on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 01:52 PM
1

New yorker 🫵
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 04:31 AM
6

Is an accusation of infidelity a universal reason to end a relationship? I don't think it is. So I don't think it's as big a deal as you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 01:25 AM
1

You could make a Mortal Kombat x Love and Deepspace crossover and it would probably be played by mostly men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 06:19 PM
1

A real man enjoys an unhealthy amount of cured meats, like the guy on the right.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:47 PM
0

Is there a difference between a married couple and an unmarried couple in long term relationship besides some legal privileges and a wedding? I don't think there is. Also most contracts have penalties for breaking them, but that's not a thing marriages. NDAs are more legally binding than a marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 06:57 PM
8

Yesterday I argued with a guy that women almost always say homophobic stuff to justify why they won't date bisexual men. The ladies have really come through for me to prove my point was true in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:03 PM
2

The odds are about 50% smaller, which is more than remotely close.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:59 AM
1

Having a woman in the house increases your odds of being killed by a woman, just like a gun.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 10:42 PM
1

Saw this comment blatantly promoting AI girlfriends on explainthejoke. Bot comments promoting bot GFs. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 07:27 PM
1

What the dog doing?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 02:32 PM
6

There's resources out there for people who struggle to understand abstract ideas https://triumphpediatrics.com/making-connections-why-some-children-have-trouble-with-abstract-thinking-and-how-therapy-can-help/
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 12:38 AM
2

I bet League of Legends has created more long distance relationships than Tinder, Bumble, or Hinge. Every LDR I know of started in a gaming discord. Online dating is trash and it certainly doesn't expand your social circles. The internet can do that, but that's not the same thing as online dating. Are you getting paid by the apps or something? You've made s bunch of posts defending monopolies that prey on human loneliness. It's not a red pill exclusive belief that these apps suck, in large part …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 12:35 AM
9

There's several women in this sub that get incredibly literal when you use an analogy. They might be trying to be clever but the result is looking stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 11:26 PM
2

You can choose not to date any demographic, but the why often reveals biases. When women actually answer why they don't want to date bi men, they almost always reveal homophobic beliefs. It's not always malice or bi-erasure, however neither you nor I can point to a woman giving a reason that isn't. You have imagined reasons, you are playing defense for imaginary women. I don't care. If they try to imply there's no reason, I'm assuming they have homophobic views about male sexuality they're afrai…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 07:28 PM
2

Are you going to make seperate comment for every paragraph? This getting out of hand. I'm only replying to one. Take some time and sort your thoughts out. I think you can't hold homophobic beliefs if you're an ally, and things like bi-erasure fall under the umbrella of homophobic views. The women lying is the women in this sub, and some men running defense for them, who try to insist that there is no reason. Or even that a straight woman dating a bisexual man is equivalent to a gay man dating a …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 06:54 PM
2

You did it again man. Take an extra minute to look over your comment so you don't have to make more comments with what you forgot to say. The quote you used is a neat example of why women lie. They want to be allies but they don't want to show that their rigid views on sexuality treat bisexuality as homosexuality in denial.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 06:42 PM
1

"...as if they need a reason to prefer one group over another". You did not say they don't need to provide a reason to someone who asks, you quite clearly say they don't need a reason. You're trying to Motte and Bailey towards a more reasonable position than the one you actually had. You listed one reason that was invented by you for this argument, not something you heard from a woman. Then you theorized that there could be other reasons. If there are other reasons, you can find them. Otherwise,…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 06:28 PM
1

"Like anytime I see a straight woman say they don’t want to it’s followed by “but why? You have to explain why” as if they need a reason to prefer one group over the other" You pretty plainly said they don't need a reason. Your argument is entirely hypothetical. "There could be other reasons" is the sum your argument. It's a non-argument. Why don't you find evidence for your ideas? Here is an article that supports my ideas. Go find something that supports yours. Go scour reddit or other forums f…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 06:00 PM
1

You started this argument by saying there might be no reason. Now you're throwing out hypothetical reasons. You're asking me to discount what women actually say and consider what they could say. It's an endless search for what could be instead of accepting what is.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 05:33 PM
1

This is kind of a weak argument. There can be other reasons. I've never seen them. You don't seem to know them. That fits my argument well. I think there's people insisting that there's no reason so they don't have to confront the bias that is the actual reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 04:50 PM
3

This is a poor comparison. We aren't talking about struggling in dating. So you succeesing as a short man is irrelevant. It's not about the difficulty for bisexual men. It's about bias in women. The women that don't date short men are loud and proud about the reasons why. Outside this sub, it's easy to find women explain why they won't date bisexual men, and those reasons are rarely anything different than what I said. It's only on this sub where people insist there's no reason
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 04:41 PM
2

Here's an easy comparison. Do you think it's likely that a gay man could date a gay man only to find out he's actually dating a cis straight woman? Do you think it's likely that a straight woman could date a straight man only to find out he's actually a bisexual man? One of those scenarios is more likely, which is why it's the comparison you made was poor.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 04:32 PM
2

Can a straight woman tell the difference between a straight man and a bisexual man by appearance?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 04:25 PM
3

I think the cohort on this sub that vehemently insists there is no reason is aware of the actual reason and doesn't want to discuss it. When women actually say why, it's almost always homophobic or just bi-erasure. They list off homophobic stereotypes like being afraid of AIDS, or that they'll cheat. Or things like they think it's unmasculine to have gay sex. Or that they think they're really just gay and in denial.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 04:25 PM
2

There is a reason for everything you do, every choice you make. It's possible that someone is not introspective enough to understand the reason, but there is a reason. There's a handful of determined individuals on this sub who insist otherwise
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 04:11 PM
3

That's a false comparison. Gay men aren't attracted to women. Straight women are attracted to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 04:08 PM
3

"Here's 2 species where males are more visually striking than females. This proves it's natural in every single species on Earth" This is such a braindead take.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 02:56 PM
1

Your arguments are not based on lived first hand experience. You explicitly guessed about why men go to strip clubs. You said that yourself. You're making things up, nothing you're describing is based on first hand experience becausr you keep writing like you have an in depth understanding of every single human's perspective. You don't. There's no point in arguing with someone that's arguing things they don't actually believe like you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 08:52 PM
8

Many red pill gurus push an idea that you to keep the woman thinking that she needs/wants you more than you need/want her. Their justification is that if she feels like you want her more, she'll feel like she's better than you. If she feels like she's better than you, she's going to look for someone better than you. Because of this, they push an idea that you need to focus on yourself. (I'm just the messenger) I think there's also a contrarian pushback to the "happy wife happy life" trope many o…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 07:58 PM
1

Sorry I didn't write my entire life story for you. "Reading stuff is not enough" but two sentences earlier you say "My guess is..." You feel comfortable lecturing me about needing real world experience while admitting you are making guesses about things you've never experienced. Your argument is based heavily on things you've heard and things you've assumed. Are you blind to this hypocritical standard? Your argument is stupid. Not getting what you want makes you want it more, it doesn't make you…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 07:48 PM
1

Except that it will not. You are removing human agency and assigning it to the body. You should read a book on operant conditioning because what you are describing is far from reality. You contradict yourself. You stated "the body associates horny and no sex as something negative". Strip clubs should be repulsive under this framework. If we take what you say, a strip club cannot be compensation for no sex. The framework YOU described explictly says horny and no sex is automatic negative bodily a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 07:09 PM
1

Most people aren't mature enough to do option D or E, on both sides of the equation. It'd be nice, but most friendships will die, or wither and never go back to what they once were.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 06:34 PM
1

What you're saying is contrived nonsense. Your body will never build a negative physiological reaction to an action resulting in no stimulus. If you smell popcorn and feel hungry, but then don't eat popcorn, your body isn't going to never want popcorn again. You'll probably be craving popcorn. How do strip clubs work if what you're saying is true? Those equal horny and no sex. Those places should never have a repeat customer by your logic, but they do. I do speak from firsthand experience, but t…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 06:26 PM
1

Or you can try and convince them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 06:22 PM
1

Because they might change their mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 06:19 PM
1

Human instict is dimimished in comparison to other mammals, and you're right, we have self awareness. Humans have the capacity to consider delayed consequence much more than dogs do. Your porn comparison makes no sense, it's actually stupid because it lends itself to the opposite of your claim. If a guy watches porn for an hour and doesn't cum, he still wants to cum. He almost surely wants to cum more than he did when he started. The desire not being satisfied will actually make him want it more…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 04:34 PM
1

So women are like dogs? They're unable to perceive consequences that aren't immediate? Once again, I seem to think women are more capable than you. It's a silly notion that sexuality happens in the body, not the mind. They're connected. Nothing happens in your mind without a biological process. Anticipation increases the intensity of emotions. That's why there's buildup before a drop in a song. That's why horror movies have tension before a jump scare. This is simple human psychology. League is …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 03:42 PM
3

"All women are short" bruh what? The average woman is shorter than the average man. That doesn't mean all women are short.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 03:10 PM
1

It does work like that for women. Women are humans. Delayed gratification is a thing women experience. It seems I have a higher opinion of women than you. Guys can make that decision just by looking at you. But often I'd say the decision would typically be made in the first few conversations, depending on the guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 03:06 PM
4

Yes. Just like how if she says yes 9 times before saying no she has not consented.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 02:35 PM
1

No, we cannot agree that men hold the cards. Even you disagree with that "If she is NOT into him she does not care whether he sticks around or not, this gives her a significant edge in her behaviour/actions, she can act with calculated intent." Not all women are so insecure and desperate for male approval. Even if they are, the answer is to build more self-esteem instead of what you suggest. Every human has the capacity for self-control. The idea that waiting always kills desire is false. It oft…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 02:19 PM
1

First, your claim in the main post is that men choose wrong. You've written a justification for why women choose wrong. Second, what is the basis of the claim that women can only make a guy wait if they're not actually into a guy? Someone perceiving you as high value has little to do with your own perception of their value. It seems like an absurd claim
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 01:48 AM
1

This is incoherent. You start by saying men choose wrong, yet you never explain what the wrong answer is or what the right answer is. You also finish with "They (women) will, as a result, pick the wrong partners." This statement does not support the idea that men choose wrong. There's no explanation for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 07:46 PM
2

What's the problem? If you can't define that how can people answer the question?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 07:41 PM
4

Just like there's less crass ways to ask for more compensation, there's less crass ways to talk about sex than opening with "I wanna get fucked" I think your primary problem on this sub is that you assume everyone you talk to is lying thtough their teeth at all times. Like right now, you reject my analogy and insist men just want a glorified fuck buddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 02:32 PM
1

No
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 02:16 PM
–

Doing it not as often as a serial misandrist.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 02:13 PM
–

Doing it often. That's my guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 02:11 PM
7

When you go into a job interview do you lead with something like "“I wanna get paid, I wanna get paid good, I wanna get paid often, I wanna get paid NOW”? I know I don't. It's not purity culture stopping me, it's that nobody likes to get hit with demands right off the bat. Sex isn't the only thing or the most important thing in a relationship, but it's important enough that no sex or not enough can kill the relationship. It's like the bathroom in a house. The bathroom isn't the only room, but if…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 02:09 PM
3

There's more than 100 upvotes and only 30ish comments on that post, which shows it's not controversial. The top 4 comments all agree with OP. OP's comments are downvoted, but not one person called OP stupid. You're making shit up.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 10:19 PM
2

It's midnight climax.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 08:43 PM
2

It's not super nuanced, it's very simple. Pretty people get the benefit of the doubt, ugly people don't. Can you answer my questions first? Do you believe the people who say getting less means he actually likes you more? Would you feel like you're getting better treatment than his exes? What does this have to do with what I said in any way?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 08:37 PM
11

You've given a great example. You didn't identify insecurity in that guy, you identified nervousness. There's millions of confident people that are wildly insecure. Look at Trump. He's always confident, but he's also deeply insecure. Many women pretend they can detect misogyny but really they can just detect anxiety and ugliness. You'll notice I didn't assign a motive for the different treatment. That's part of the problem, you'll never know the motive. You'll never know if thinks you're not wor…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 08:16 PM
3

I'm unaware of any other man on Cavill's level of fame and good looks that publicly talks about playing warhammer 40k and total war. There's basically no one else a crusty 40k player can look at and say "omg he's just like me"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 05:08 PM
2

The Jubilee Surrounded for the manosphere was less toxic than other recent surrounded episodes. The Liberal Man vs. MAGA women was a deathmatch by comparison. I expected way more venom.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 05:05 PM
5

He's a good looking guy that is open about his nerdy interests. Guys wanna be him.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 05:02 PM
22

Point 1: Thee issue is often that women routinely claim they are mind readers. Many women love to say that they can tell that men are misogynists or insecure, and that's why incels can't get a girl. So there are women like you saying "we can't read minds or know men's inentions" and there are women like saying that they read minds and know men's intentions. These women never seem to call each other out. Point 2: Imagine if you dated a guy who was kinda frugal with you but then you find out he us…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 04:35 PM
5

This is a cope from women on this sub, and not true. It's routinely contradicted by women in this sub such as you in point 2. That's the point of the complaint. Even working women want a man that finacially uplifts them, or at least stabilizes them. A man's finacial status is very important in dating. This is false on 2 accounts. First is that 40% of children are born out of wedlock in the US, and 20% of mothers are single mothers. Lots of women have kids from casual sex. The second issue is tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 01:56 PM
7

So you're choosing to dismiss and ignore women as well. Fascinating. You're also using niceguy logic. Being picky lowers match quality? You seem to be implying that attractive women are all bad/shallow and if they just matched with those less attractive nice girls it would be better.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 05:19 AM
4

The woman in the first experiment describes how miserable the experience was. At 6:45 "At this point I'm not motivated, I am not happy with the results" at 7:20 "How can I get these women to go on a date with me if they don't even reply to me. If we match, why aren't we talking. I matched with so many and I go no response" At 10:22 "In the last days I was like 'I hate this, I don't want to do this again'" At 12:13 "I just feel sorry for like guys and stuff, no no I don't think this is good". If …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 04:49 AM
1

I'd love to know how you think he could improve his profile
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 09:03 PM
1

Actually what happens is you, specifically you because you do not represent women, refuse to believe us. You tell us we're liars and lazy. You listen to anecdotes, you look at the experiments people run, and then you simply declare "no, you're wrong". For more than 7 years you have been telling men on PPD that their experiences are wrong. Don't pretend to have empathy, you don't and no one believes you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 04:45 PM
1

You claimed you boosted your account and it worked. You expect us to take you at your word. I said I boosted mine and it didn't work. You demand evidence. You'll only see evidence of my claim if you show evidence of yours. Ladies first.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 03:39 PM
1

See lazy. Can’t even take a picture, can’t even spend seven dollars, And can’t even take another picture. Lilith's PPD problem is an issue of laziness and a lack of accountability. Jokes aside, prove it's so easy. Do it. Show us your profile.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 03:26 PM
5

That's why I told you to enlist help, learned helplessness will hurt you. The whole thing is you claiming others have run the experiment wrong. It's on you to prove them wrong. "Show pictures of the number of people you liked you BEFORE boosting and after Boosting," You made the claim first, you can show proof first.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 03:08 PM
8

I know what 5 of them look like IRL and none of them are ugly. I think you're wrong about the ugliness and right about anime gooner market.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 02:54 PM
6

"...they've already strong problems with their situation" Nonsense sentence, seems to be missing a verb. It's also needlessly vague. You're not a man, your experience on dating apps is different (that basically summarizes your entire PPD experience). I've boosted my accounts and it made no difference. Your anecdotal evidence amounts to nothing. You spend hours arguing on PPD every day, so wasting time isn't believable. I offered to pay, so you can't make the wasting money argument either. Your e…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 02:41 PM
11

It's your claim, you're the one that needs evidence to back it up. You're the one telling us that the dating app experiments are poorly run and that you know how to do it better. You're an armchair quarterback calling me lazy. You didn't respond to 2/3 of my comment. Should I assume it's because you agree with what I said?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 02:08 PM
1

Got your 🐐
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 03:44 AM
–

If you don't understand analogies you really don't have the high ground to call anyone illogical.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 01:27 AM
1

Metalcore is for posers /s
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 01:15 AM
1

Union Street in San Francisco on any warm Sunday.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 10:51 PM
9

You can ask a PPDer to help you. You can ask a male friend for help. You can ask a random guy to use his pictures. This isn't hard. What factors? Paying? Do you have any data that paying gets more results? This is just a baseless claim. You can't even cite your own anecdotal evidence because you've never done it. We do accept we don't have pretty privelege. Guys are explicitly saying that dating apps are near worthless for guys who aren't above average. You're just making shit up at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 10:47 PM
27

We've had PPDers collaborate on dating app experiments before. If you really want to prove something there's nothing stopping you from doing one. You can show us definitive proof by running your own experiment. If you wanna make a fake profile and pay to boost it, I'll reimburse you on paypal. Or, you can baselessly claim everyone else is doing it wrong. What's the point of this post? It seems like you're saying dating apps aren't that bad, but then you say "Because usually in these dating exper…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 07:49 PM
2

Sample size: 2
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 04:49 PM
4

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 04:06 PM
–

It takes two to tango. Are women devoid of free will? In order for a man without finacial stability to get married a woman has to agree. In order for a man with no stable income to have children, a woman has to agree. In order for a man to make a woman be a SAHM a woman has to agree. So who cares? What you're describing is not at all a common occurence yet your title still lays the blame on all men. It's ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 03:32 PM
–

You can have any preference. Preferences for money and looks are shallow. No one is stopping you from having those preferences, you just want to believe that you're not shallow. Being called shallow won't kill you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 03:51 AM
4

The vast majority of humans prioritize appearance before anything else. You think only shallow people do it, which is not true. There's plenty of studies about how being good looking massively benefits people in all aspects of society. Being better looking inproves your chances of getting hired, pretty much no matter the job. Being good looking makes people less likely to think you are a criminal. Some studies even show being better looking improves your chances of winning elections. Your consta…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 09:51 PM
5

Self-improvement is currently framed as "be better than you currently are" which is a goal that can never be truly achieved. You can always improve, which leaves people constantly feeling like they aren't enough. There is no finish line, there is no end, there is no enough. The rat race has spread from the corporate world into your love life and your sense of self. Keep running rats.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 09:29 PM
7

7.3k karma on a 2 month old account. If the rage bait about your guardian angel doesn't convince people you're a troll, that karma count should.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 04:29 AM
–

"Exactly. Why wouldn't you take advice from someone who dated and found a relationship?" You specifically asked why not take advice from someone in a relationship. I gave the reason. Did you forget what you originally wrote? "Getting to know each other" is not something people who know each other well can do. These are very different circumstances, insisting otherwise is just a bad joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 11:11 PM
–

I didn't claim being single means you have good advice to give. Why make those statements? People who are in a healthy long term relationship can give good relationship advice. A long term couple going on a date night is not at all analogous to dating while single. Beyond generic truisms that are obvious, most people are completely unqualified to offer dating advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 10:49 PM
–

My dad tried to give me job hunting advice, and revealed he had never used an online application. He had no idea what it was like to be on the job market today. His advice was horribly outdated. That's similar to when people who have been in a relationship for more than a decade start giving dating advice. They have little idea what the market is like. My dad, who has not dated since the 80s, offered unsolicited dating advice to me a few times. Unsurprisingly, his advice was outdated.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 10:34 PM
–

Being in a relationship doesn't mean you have good advice to give. People who have been in a relationship for a long time are likely out of touch. I'm a believer that most people aren't equipped to give much advice beyond general stuff like "get in shape" and "wear better clothes".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 10:25 PM
10

Would he? Most guys would probably welcome the attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 06:44 PM
11

"I’ve seen men point it out as some sort of “gotcha” that if the guy a woman rejected were handsome, she wouldn’t have rejected him…..no shit??" You have misinterpreted what is being said. It's not about saying yes to someone, it's about how behavior is interpreted based on how attractive someone is. The attached comic is an example from 13 years ago. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 06:36 PM
0

"I am the table" is what entitled women often answer when asked what they bring. It's also an old Metallica Meme <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 04:10 PM
2

I am the table
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 01:57 PM
6

Right now chatbots like to lead their paragraphs with a clear statement of purpose. They often use headers, bolded text, and colons to do this. There's some of that in this post. The em dash is less common. Right now the most blatant tell is "it's not x, it's y". Chatbots seem to live that phrase.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 02:15 AM
1

She accused him of rape and abuse after cutting off his dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 01:28 AM
3

Everyone buy Cat Chess. It's the best way to play chess.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 01:47 AM
1

That's fun. IMO it's not the most exciting battle of the era so I assumed you might have heard about it in the play.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 01:42 AM
16

"Ask yourself if you have really ever felt powerless by another human being?" All the time. I'm a small person. I actually have less sympathy for women because of this. As a man I'm expected to defend myself, regardless of the size of my attacker. Women across the world have a learned helplessness about self defense that nearly everyone just seems to accept. "Oh it's not fair, men are bigger and stronger" I'll tell you the same things I heard when a guy almost twice my size assaulted me. Go to t…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 01:40 AM
5

I believe that ugly people get treated worse and that the poor treatment slowly molds them into bitter, mean people. Fat women are the meanest women I've encountered.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 01:06 AM
1

Why Actium? Is it because of the play Antony and Cleopatra?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 12:57 AM
1

The woman in tbe video didn't claim she doesn't do it for her husband. She's probably not married. There's no ring. So first, this woman doesn't prove that women won't do it for their husbands. Second, people who want to be spies do crazy things and are hardly representative of the general population. I also don't believe this woman. "Spies" always talk a big game because no one in the business will fact check them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 06:48 PM
1

"If they wanted to make a political movie there's a lot of dialogue missing" This why netflix executives tell movie makers and showrunners they need to explain the plot multiple times throughout the movie. So many people demand the movie/show hold their hand and lay out the meaning in explicit detail.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 06:37 PM
2

What a revolutionary idea
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 06:21 PM
13

"I don't understand why they give so much importance to something so stupid" You get bombarded with romance in society. A huge chunk of art is about romantic love, from the tale of Orpheus to Taylor Swift's music. The idea that after all that you don't understand it tells me you either don't want understand it or you struggle with empathy. There's an intimacy and closeness in romantic relationships most friends will never have. There's also the chance to become life partners. I'm never gonna buy…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 09:53 PM
2

If you knew military girls you wouldn't be saying that 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 07:51 PM
4

Do you think Misogyny isn't real because misogynists have wives?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 07:50 PM
3

Zendaya is like Henry Cavil. Henry Cavil is what men think women want, and Zendaya is what women think men want.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 07:46 PM
12

Women want to express their shallow preferences without being called shallow.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 05:06 PM
9

That's incredibly circular reasoning
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 04:53 AM
1

They absolutely do. People with low self esteem often accept terrible treatment for a few crumbs of validation.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 11:11 PM
2

I clicked on a link ypu posted to someone's youtube essay about Obsession and my youtube feed is full of Obsession videos now.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 06:40 PM
2

He was wearing smart glasses. He deserved worse
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 03:38 PM
1

I know you didn't. But you said men are weak and pathetic, and you also said boys are being raised like girls. If weak and pathetic men are acting like women, it stands to reason women are weak and pathetic. Andrew Tate calls men pathetic and weak and says men need to stop whining. As far as I can tell the main difference is you haven't tried to make a scam course Why should men be old school gentlemen with women who aren't old school ladies?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 12:14 AM
1

Married men using porn doesn't counter my claim in any way. It's a non-sequitur. There's also only a single study of 318 men (not all of those men were OF users) behind the claim that the majority of OnlyFans users are married men. It's not true. I didn't say sex was a need. You should argue against what I actually said. I called it maitenance. You can choose to skip doing it, just like you can skip changing the oil on a car, just don't act surprised when things break down.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 12:08 AM
1

North Korea
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 10:45 PM
3

Incels have an incredibly oversized influence on the internet. Chad is in common usage and it's an incel term. Who would guessed that the terminally online influence the online world?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 10:43 PM
1

Lmao "Surfs". It's serf. Peasant is a term used to identify pre-industrial lower class farmers. Peasantry never existed in the US and it was gone from most of Europe before WW1. So unless your ancestors were Soviet, Chinese, or Indian, they were not peasants in WW2. It follows, as you've said that boys are raised like girls, that today's women are weak and pathetic as well. Why do you think we should let 50% of society be weak and pathetic. Also you can trash talk Andrew Tate all you like but yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 10:41 PM
–

The biggest pornstar of probably the last decade is Riley Reid, and she has a flat chest and narrow hips. Can you explain why the men who are unsatisfied with their flat partners go and watch porn with flat women?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 10:26 PM
1

How do you know this male nature? What your grandparents did in WW2 wasn't natural. Nothing we do in society is natural, it's all artificial. We are not creatures of nature. What does society gain from men concealing emotions? There's nothing stopping someone from crying and acting. If there is something stopping people from crying and solving problems, shouldn't women be taught not to cry so they can be useful? I didn't say my ancestors never went to war, although most of them never did. I said…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 10:00 PM
1

What have I made up? Your statement here is a massive backtrack from your previous ones. Should we embrace our nature as beings created to kill, or should we do what fits the modern world?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 07:52 PM
1

Chat GPT can't do critical thinking for you. For thousands of years, our ancestors' primary concern was farming. They defined manliness by hardwork, not some childish notion of murderous unflinching bravery. Their lives depended on grain harvests, not their skill with a spear. They only fought because they had to, and they shirked when they could. My ancestors would think I'm weak because I can't plow a field. Your ancestors would beat you for speaking out of turn and remind you "I do not permit…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 06:05 PM
1

But you said we are made for for war and hunting. Why should we be more civilized if we were "made to kill" as you say? If men are made to lead like you say they are, why should women have rights? Shouldn't you simply follow your leaders? Why would I hold myself to the standards of my ancestors while denying myself the dominance over women they had? How should I incorporate being a warrior into my teaching job? Should I kill my disabled students because they will be a burden to society, like my …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 05:12 PM
2

My ancestors who were warriors would sack a city, massacre all the men and boys, and take the women and girls as slaves. Should we be doing that today? My ancestors who were warriors lived in strict patriarchies where women were second class citizens. Should we follow their example?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 04:07 PM
1

I'd like to thank the academy and my cinematographer
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 10:21 PM
1

Do I get a medal?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 10:17 PM
3

"Men would rather sexually coerce (rape) their wives than leave them" This statement seems to imply that men should leave their wives if sex drops off. Is that what you're trying to say? It seems strange to mention the male loneliness epidemic in this context. Married men are not the lonely men. Married men tend to have much stronger social circles than single men, in addition to being in a relationship. They tend to have better mental health as well. Just thought I'd point that out. I'll take a…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 10:12 PM
3

There's no shortage of guys who will marry a woman regardless of her past. I read an interview of a woman who worked at the Bunny Ranch near Vegas and she was married while still working. Even if this some kind of religious repetance she probably wouldn't struggle too much to find a man at church. I know a woman that did that. This isn't a real problem. If this woman thinks her promiscuous past is bad the only acceptable choice is option #1. Option #2 is continuing to do something she thinks is …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 05:54 PM
0

I'm sure you've written a peer reviewed paper proving all those other psychiatrists wrong, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 05:28 PM
–

Aren't you a fat Saudi Arabian gay man? How are these movies relatable to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 01:23 AM
22

If you want a blue pill grifter hire a dating coach or a matchmaker. They main difference is they won't rugpull you with memecoins.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 10:57 PM
2

Men in the future may have it different, but men in the present have to play by the rules of the present. Going for a niche isn't going to exempt you from needing to conform to the standards of the day.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 04:06 PM
2

I'm blaming women and men as each half of the society upholding these standards. You're really dodging the point that going for a niche isn't gonna save you from needing to conform to hegemonic masculinity if you intend to attract women. Your advice is bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 03:47 PM
2

That's not happening anytime soon, and it's not going to happen as long as women enforcing it too. That's why your "go for a niche" advice is so silly in this context.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 03:31 PM
2

Anger is the one negative emotion masculinity allows for. Anger is the negative emotion that won't make men and women see you as less masculine. Sadness, anxiety, fear, doubt, these are the emotions that men cover up to avoid being seen as less masculine.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 03:12 PM
2

I do. Confidence and competence are baked into hegemonic masculinity. Women's selection is built around masculinity. Women don't want men to open up. Women want men to be expressive about positive emotions, but they absolutely do not want to hear about the negative ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 02:58 PM
2

A personality that still conforms to masculime standards. I haven't observed huge personality differebces across niches. What niche do you imagine is more accepting of men that don't conform to hegemonic masculinity?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 02:47 PM
–

Eratonsthenes calculated the circumference of the Earth to within about 300km. That was 2400 years ago. Modern Science didn't prove the Earth is round, ancient science did that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 02:39 PM
1

Lilith NEVER answers questions. Good try.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 02:26 PM
3

Niches are just aesthetic changes. The guys in all the niches still conform to that hegemonic masculinity you described, the only difference is clothing and haircuts. If you're unsuccessful in the general populace, getting some tattoos, growing out your hair, and wearing metal band shirts will leave you unsuccessful with women in the metal community and the general populace.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 02:20 PM
–

Why does any anti-social behavior continue to be a persistent issue? Can you answer that? It's most certainly not just men defending predators. 44% of women voted for Trump in 2024, and the biggest pedo defender in the US was Pam Bondi.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 09:58 PM
1

Why are you sorry? It's not a bad thing. Clubs aren't for me. In fact, I found an entire community of people who don't like clubs, bars, or raves. That's why I think introverts should go out to the places they like instead of forcing themselves into places they do not fit in.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 09:45 PM
0

Absolutely no one in my social circles has met their SO at a bar or club. When I was in college there was a lot of people hooking up at clubs and bars, but nothing long term ever grew out of it. My life experience leads me to doubt the universality of your ideas. The only people at bars I ever see talking to people they don't already know is old guys, usually talking to other old guys about the game. Outside of the bars that underagers hang out at, the social aspect of the bar is on life support…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 07:24 PM
3

I haven't been able to verify any of the claims you made. I have not found claims that serial monogamy was common, I've only found evidence that polygamy was more common. I'm fairly confident what you said about China is not true. Was this an online lecture I could watch, or in person? I keep seeing "fairly recent" brought up in this context and I just wanna point out that's like 3,000-5000 years ago we're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 02:57 PM
11

Sounds like you have no links, so you're weaseling your way out of being caught empty handed. You also did not read most of my posr based on this reply speed and the fact that you didn't even address it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 02:30 PM
12

Has anyone ever said they want a woman to be desperately horny just by looking at him, or is that your "interpretation" of what someone actually said. If you have evidence that people believe this, show us some comments. You're out of touch. Internet porn consumers skip the story in porn so much that producers started minimizing or ditching the story all together. People have never watched porn for the story, and on the internet they skip straight to the action. You're also describing old tropes…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 02:26 PM
5

"Game" is just charisma, and most of the people who have ut grew up with it. It's incredibly difficult to learn, and there's no science to it. It's 100% vibe based. Telling a wallflower to get game is like telling someone to develop ESP. It's probably not gonna happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 11:47 PM
–

There is no "natural state" of humanity. Human society itself is artificial, and has changed over hundreds of thousands of years. Appeals to nature are silly, we aren't natural. Human society is a rejection of nature's uncaring ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 05:49 PM
1

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 03:34 PM
3

I would like a crumb of context or a single example of this "trend"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 11:46 PM
–

I saw that thread. She said she is size 22. She said she heard it's hard to get a match if you're above slightly chubby, not that she is slightly chubby. Size 22 is firmly in obese territory. She is fatter than most Americans. That thread also had lots of guys talking about it could be a yes if her face was still cute and how the weight was distributed.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 09:38 PM
–

I'm not arguing at all in this thread 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 08:30 PM
4

You're unwilling to answer questions or make good faith attempts at debate. You're just arguing for the sake of arguing Have a laugh. It's on the house.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 07:46 PM
5

Did Talleyrand the wise ever say he wanted a woman to touch herself at night while thinking about him? No. Did anyone in this thread? No, yet you started arguing against it. Why? I think that you're not content arguing against a reasonable argument, so you invent unreasonable ones to argue with. Hence, windmills and giants.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 07:41 PM
4

Answer this question. What prompted you to write about women touching themselves at night?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 07:37 PM
3

"You clearly aren’t doing enough with your life if you’re upset some random woman isn’t thinking about you when she’s fingering herself." That character is you, the Man from La Mancha becomes the Woman from Babylon. The character becomes delusional and embarks on fanciful quest against enemies that don't exist. I'll spell it out in plain English. Don Quixote's delusional mind leads him to see windmill's as giants. Your delusional mind leads to see statements like "men want to feel attractive" as…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 07:08 PM
4

You did, so the Don Quixote character would be Lilith, la Mujer de la Babilonia.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 06:55 PM
9

What does porn have to do with this? The desire for someone to find you physically attractive is a basic human feeling, not porn brain rot. Talleyrand says men want to feel attractive and you start ranting about wanting someone to masturbate to you at night. This is probably the most absurd strawmen I've ever seen you build.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 06:43 PM
5

There's so many little things about a person you can only learn by living with them. I think most people today hope to figure out incompatabilities in living arragements before they promise to spend the rest of their life together.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 06:20 PM
3

I already gave you two examples. I'm not going to define every single circumstance between those examples. Make an argument, I'm not playing "20 tedious questions" with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 02:12 AM
2

That depends on the time frame. It also depends on if those matches send a message as well as if those matches are scammers/bots/beggars. Your examples haven't included a time frame. 70 matches in a month is very different than 70 matches in 3 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 01:57 AM
2

The giants you're looking for are just windmills.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 01:30 AM
3

The difference is an order of magnitude of matches. It's the difference between 70 and 700. This is what I mean what I say you're being obtuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 12:29 AM
3

You're like Don Quixote but instead of fighting imaginary giants you're fighting things no one has said.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 12:10 AM
6

You're being painfully obtuse. How many of those matches result in a message? How many get more than a couple messages? How many are bots? How many are girls fishing for instagram followers? Most importantly, how many result in a date? You don't know the answers to those questions. The main point is that if you think a match is an "option" you have either a grossly loose definition of option, or you have no idea what online dating is like.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 12:01 AM
1

You're excessively verbose but your sentences say very little. You're all style and no substance.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 02:55 PM
3

How would you regulate it? Sex work is illegal in the Phillipines and Thailand. It's not an enforcement priority for them. How would you imagine that changing? The laws that you do suggest, like mandatory DNA ID, are incredibly Draconian and you kinda sound like the Republicans after they lost against birthright citizenship. Also it's a bad joke that you think not being looksmatched is a valid argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 02:53 PM
5

Holy run-on sentences Batman!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 02:29 PM
0

https://reis.cis.es/index.php/reis/article/view/826/1056 Being ugly has a negative effect on a man's chance of being partnered and no effect on a woman's. It's a myth that men care more about appearance than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 06:59 PM
0

For a lot of them it's a mail order bride with plausible deniability. They can say "I charmed her" and not mention how heavy they leaned on their money to do the charming.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 06:56 PM
2

I'm going to assume you're dodging my main argument because you have no counter. You're so painfully unaware of how simping works you think they aren't being as agreeable as possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 03:29 PM
2

Don't dodge my comment. Address the rest. Why are you assuming these women are so bad? It's weird to be so hateful towards people you know nothing about.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 03:24 PM
2

First, I think you should say whether or not you think "just be yourself" is valid advice. Your title loosely implies JBY isn't bad advice, while also implying it is bad advice by suggesting a person needs to change. When a guy humilates himself for a woman's attention, it's typically by acting excessively agreeable. That's what simping is. The idea that they're being disagreeable makes me think you're imaging a rude clown instead of a guy doing whatever he thinks will make one woman happy. Also…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 02:34 PM
4

If they have social media posts about it why didn't you link one of them? Instead you linked a compilation of Americans mocking PPBs. What I see all over the internet is what you posted. Americans claiming that locals are calling them LBHs, but nothing from the locals themselves. Possibly because "ผู้แพ้ชาวอเมริกัน" doesn't roll off the tongue quite like LBH.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 05:53 PM
4

I'll take that to mean no, the video doesn't show what you claim it shows. Is it really that hard to find a single non-American saying LBH? It seems like it's a term invented by Americans. One would imagine people in places like Thailand and Korea would use insults in Thai and Korean.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 05:42 PM
4

I did not see any posts that are read, nor did I see a Colombian tv report. There's a bunch of Americans claiming that LBH is popular, but no posts. There was a screenshot of an article about Colombia that was cropped to cut out the source at the start of the video, but nothing else. Either you linked a different video than you think you did, or one of us tripping. Maybe I'm missing it. Can you timestamp this Colombian TV report?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 05:26 PM
6

"Calling us"? None of the people in that video are passport bros. It's all Americans mocking passport bros, and they aren't quoting any local women. Did you link the wrong video?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 05:10 PM
6

The video you posted seems to be all Americans. It doesn't seem to support what you're saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 04:42 PM
3

Banning marriage visas would not stop PPBs. Thanks to WFH, PPBs go and live in country. Thailand's average income is significantly higher than it's neighbors in part because so many foreigners live there and work remotely. Ending the visa program will only stop them from bringing them to the US, but will not stop them from just moving to those countries. Your final comments about hygiene lead me to believe you don't actually care aboit foreign women. You're just offended that a small group of me…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 08:15 PM
3

A dirty bomb wouldn't help Ukraine. A dirty bomb is a terrorist weapon with very limited military application. All it would do is give Russia full justification to use nuclear weapons.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 07:52 PM
–

Hiplets are so insecure, they just need to be confident. If they're confident it means they're spiritually not a hiplet
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 08:11 PM
1

She slobbers over best friend's husband, fantasizes about how big his dick his, and publicly pushes to have sex with them. (Also disrespectful to her friend). She often insults him or negs him in her videos. She also posts a lot of things showing that she mainly cares about his money. One example is that she said "his money is our money, and my money is my money". There's plenty of her videos showing this. It all adds up to a woman who sees her man as a doormat and a wallet. That's why he got do…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 11:35 PM
0

Her "lies" only mattered because he incorporated them into his public image. When she started talking about her past and present on a podcast it really pulled the rug out from under that image. He went from "guy who has a wife much hotter than him" to "guy who has a wife that openly disrespects him".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 11:05 PM
2

This is an ad https://i.redd.it/2ebmy1pvj69h1.gif
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 07:07 AM
–

Most searched on what sites? Who defines what fetish is? How is bondage not included? I don't believe this graphic
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 09:52 PM
–

Comedy gold in the comments <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 09:48 PM
26

For the same reason that women don't write on theirs saying they don't want to pay.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 03:01 PM
30

I've found no evidence that left wing women want to split the bill in greater numbers. That's one of the frustrating things. They could talk about feminism and gender roles all day, but they still expect the man to pay. If you had said ugly desperate woman it would have been a much more believable idea. Saying woman who want to be sugar mamas makes it stupid, because they aren't looking to pay for average or below average Joe. Not to mention women looking to be sugar mamas are exceedingly rare. …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 02:21 PM
3

Jestermaxxing was a jeopardy category today 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 02:22 AM
1

Pitbulls need serious training due to their breeding and the kinds of people who want pitbulls don't do that training, leading most pitbulls to be dangerous animals. The first kind is trashy people who want an aggressive junkyard guard dog. They won't train it, except to be more aggressive. The other type is the kind of person who sees a pitbull and thinks it has such a cute smile. They put a half-hearted effort into training it. These dogs are just as dangerous junkyard dogs, but less predictab…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 03:55 PM
3

So, what does it say about the woman's agreeableness, selflessness, and willingness to sacrifice if she doesn't pay? If I paid, should I assume the woman has dark triad tendencies, and is narcissistic, antisocial, and manipulative?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 02:06 PM
13

You write a whole tirade and end it with telling people to hide their emotions to not be annoying. That's what they've been doing. Men have been pretty explicit ANY display of emotion can be met with people calling you emotional and weak, and that it's safer to never express those emotions. Your rant is meaningless because your final paragraph effectively says don't show emotions because adults shouldn't do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 10:54 PM
4

1% of men do what?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 06:46 PM
–

In similar news, the sun rose in the East this morning.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 02:33 PM
–

Dying of dysentary is tight!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 11:08 PM
15

It does. You're unable to differentiate them, yet you insist they're different. To me that suggests you aren't stating the reasons you think they're different. There's clearly something about bisexual men that you find unappealing, and either you lack the introspective ability to identify it or you don't want to say it. I know all kinds of woman who talk a big game about their progressive views on masculinity while talking about getting the ick any time a man does something stereotypically femin…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 09:28 PM
10

You've already agreed you cannot tell the difference between a straight man and a bisexual man without them telling you. That means "want to date straight people" cannot be the reason because you cannot tell them apart. It should be noted that arguing that straight people don't want to date bi people because they want to date straight people is an example of the "begging the question" fallacy. Women routinely list reasons such as fear of AIDS, fear of cheating, and questions about masculinity fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 09:08 PM
9

Okay, but why not? You can't tell the difference without them or someone else telling you. If you can't tell them apart, what makes you less interested in them?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 08:46 PM
–

It's not uncommon for shows to start around 7 and end around 12, depending on how many opening acts there are. If you want to be in the front you have to get in line early (unless it's a show with seats in the front), often a few hours early. Presumably someone at the front could have been in line, then in the front row for 5+ hours before the headliner starts. I'm not trying to defend these stank ass people, I've spent too much time around stinkers at shows. I'm just saying that you gotta hold …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 08:16 PM
10

Why not? Could you tell the difference between a straight man and a bisexual man if both were dating a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 08:07 PM
1

That doesn't look like a rebuttal, it looks like a red herring. Your poor reading ability continues to cause problems. I did not say I only watched the first video. You showed attractive women. Were they all hypersexual, slutty, and fickle? You couldn't possibly know. The woman in the first video is almost as wide as she is tall. She certainly does not have a barbie figure. She's also barely above the legal height to be a dwarf and telling an average height man he's too short.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 03:07 PM
2

That's not in conflict with the narrative. The narrative is that the rules don't exist for the men they actually like, and that they don't like most men. So it's entirely possible for most Americans to not be part of regular hookup culture and for this to be true. I clearly said the woman in the first video. Take your time when reading, it helps. You refer to women as pussy and slutty. When women don't behave as you would you start talking about them like you're a misogynstic incel. You don't ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 11:02 PM
6

Have you seen a barbie? How could you look at the woman in the first video and say those are barbie proportions? This post is dripping with venom and contempt for any woman that doesn't act exactly how you think they should. It's misogynistic enough to get a guy banned. For god's sake you use "pussy" as a substitute for women. (It does entertain me to see how you'll attack other women just to try and get a win against the men) What's your evidence that any of the behavior that you described isn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 04:45 PM
–

There are some size queens in this sub and I want to see what they have to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 12:00 AM
2

Nitpick: That JSTOR article has an error. The Equal Credit Oppurtunity Act did not give women the right to open a bank account. It's a common myth. It was about making it illegal to deny credit based on protected classifications. Women could already open a bank account in all 50 states.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 11:58 PM
1

Rough count, 16 out of 20 of the most recent posts are explicitly about dating. Obviously there's other topics but the sub has a pretty strong focus. How did you end up here? Did a post show up in your feed? Did you see a reference/link in another sub? Off topic, why did you get banned?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 06:06 PM
1

True, but you stopped dating (presumably). Why be in a sub with a dating focus instead of a broader gender issue sub?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 05:53 PM
8

What brings the people who have been married for many years to this sub? The single people at least have skin in the game. Why are you thinking about dating/gender politics if you're married?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 05:36 PM
3

That was funny. She crashed out because she really thought one compliment would magically fix his crippling insecurity.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 05:02 PM
1

What is the yellow pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 04:30 PM
2

A healthy man in his late 40s mogs an unhealthy man in his late 70s. In similar news, the sun rose in the East this morning.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 02:37 PM
1

I get it, but this isn't even in the top 10 of nutjob vtuber fan behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 06:17 PM
1

It didn't actually happen. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 05:14 PM
3

They clearly aren't, otherwise you wouldn't be commenting here. It's optional to comment yet here you are. If this was beneath consideration you wouldn't even think about commenting, much less actually do it. Low effort troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 02:15 PM
24

I don't know a single woman who thinks thinks dating is better now. In fact, they complain a lot. Women having higher standards doesn't really change the fact that the whole affair of modern dating is a dumpster fire.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 02:11 PM
5

Number one, that doesn't matter. Optional things can be hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 02:08 PM
3

That's not how you measure if something is hard or not. That's actually entirely irrelevant to how hard something is. Do you think marathons aren't hard?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 02:04 PM
2

How would it being optional have any effect on how hard it is?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 02:00 PM
2

People love to be entertained by people they shame. I know a dozen women who watch shows like Love Island because they "like watching trashy people". They shame them, but they still watch.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 07:55 PM
2

You cannot revoke consent after the fact. What an absurd suggestion.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 03:05 PM
1

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/08/15/a-growing-share-of-us-husbands-and-wives-are-roughly-the-same-age/ The average age gap is 2.2 years. It doesn't matter if a retired man thinks 20 year olds are more attractive because the overwhelming number of adults date close to their own age.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 02:58 AM
39

Woodrow Wilson didn't announce his support for the 19th amendment so he could get easy hookups, and JFK didn't sign that Equal Pay Act because he wanted to go 50/50 on dates. It's simply untrue that men supported feminism on the promise of more balanced social and romantic dynamics.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 01:54 AM
1

When people say "the average woman is 37" in this discourse it's a solid indicator they aren't engaging with an intellectual honesty. The vast majority date in range similar to their own age. Someone in their 60s isn't in the dating pool of the average 30 year old. This isn't rocket science.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 12:51 AM
2

Anyone else reading berserk? At the rate they make chapters it might finish by 2050.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 02:46 AM
–

On a date, you can just leave. You have no obligation to stay. Either you lack a backbone and refused to just leave a horrible date, or you might be playing fast and loose with the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 07:23 PM
1

Have you considered these are different people making those arguments? <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 03:03 PM
-1

Yes, the term "sexual coercion" has such a broad definition that using coercion in the term is inaccurate and misleading.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 02:39 PM
0

I don't care that an obscure medical journal (which you haven't linked so as far as I know that quote is fake) plays fast and loose with definitions. It's literally not coercion by the definition of coercion.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 02:30 PM
-1

Coercion does not include repetitive asking. Coercion is using threats to compel someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 02:25 PM
-1

Lmao madonna-whore complex for women
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 04:45 PM
–

If you're so concerned about people knowing what you say you can turn your post history off.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 02:33 PM
1

Are you most women?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 01:55 PM
9

The issue is that someone shit testing you is only looking to disqualify you. By your own description the primary purpose of asking the question is to see if the other person makes a mistake. Anyone shit testing you has one foot already out the door. There's a very small chance to build a real connection.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 03:34 AM
6

The problem is someone testing you instead of actually trying to connect. I'm not interested in someone who tries to trip me up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 03:12 AM
2

I'm not autistic. I've got a different disorder instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 01:30 AM
14

You've described a shit test lmao. That's exactly the problem behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 12:54 AM
38

I think it's actually a decent question. However, if it was asked on a date it runs the risk of seeming like a shit test, where the asker doesn't really care about the answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 09:50 PM
46

I recently gave up. You have to put in so much effort and most of the time you get nothing to show for it. I get this surreal feeling a lot. I see women complain about men who don't clean enough, but in my experiences I've never dated a woman as cleanly as me. I always wonder if it's dirty women complaining, or if I'm just unlucky as hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 05:01 PM
18

You'll notice I never said that, she said that. You'd be better off directing your question at her.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 04:25 PM
–

There's no such thing as a rich incel, so they really can't use surrogates. Not that they'd even want to
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 04:20 PM
27

This seems to contradict many of your previous posts. You've previously argued that you can't expect someone to really desire you early on. Now you're arguing the opposite. Is this an admission that you were wrong in previous posts? You seem incredibly off the mark bringing up transactional relationships. Anyone who wants to feel truly desired doesn't want a transactional relationship. They want someone who wants them, not what material things they have to offer. A prostitute truly desires your …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 02:56 PM
–

The way she calls other women "bitches" would get her banned if she wasn't the mods' pet.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 02:08 AM
7

I'm 5'5. I didn't list my height on the apps. I'd get a handful of matches every few months. I noticed that eventually they'd ask my height and then slow fade me or ghost me. I stopped using apps. I fare slightly better in person but I've still been told I'm too short in a variety of different rejections and "ending-things" conversations. Despite all that, I have to deal with people, especially the women in my life, insisting that appearance isn't everything. People will say it's obvious on this…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 02:07 AM
3

There's no jurisdiction in the US that would give the death penalty for a single act of second degree murder, and few that would give it for a single act of first degree murder. You're unusually bloodthirsty
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 10:59 PM
3

The issue of settling brings up questions like "do you really like me, or are you just afraid of being alone?"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 10:56 PM
3

I didn't claim they were. That's part of the problem. We can't mention men without someone making it a "who has it worse" argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 08:21 PM
10

It's rather funny just how accurate that quote from the first article is when I read comments like yours. "What they heard from the left is: you don’t have problems, you are the problem." It's really frustrating how people on the left can see how the failures of the American economy wreak havoc across society, but at the same time refuse to accept that young men are on the receiving end of much of that havoc.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 07:50 PM
–

Do you know this from experience? You've been complaining about nice guys for more than 7 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 04:23 PM
1

If parents want to control what they're kids learn they should skill up to become a teacher or get the money for private school.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 02:23 PM
3

Looks like the mods are finally sick of a certain prolific poster's shit lmao https://preview.redd.it/oshfr2ql7b6h1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=326f381e9e78dd88cdd21a80b52160908701bae5
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 07:35 PM
2

I wanna see them in some god awful special forces movie with him. That would be christmas come early.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 04:44 PM
1

These body cam channels are fucking macabre. They're like vultures circling tragedy for content.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 02:22 AM
1

It seems like you've completely missed the point. It's not about negative behaviors being brought up. It's about when a women tells you to open up, and then uses what you told her as ammunition in an argument. It's not sbout being held accountable, it's about someone you trust twisting the knife. It seems common for men who don't express a lot of emotion and feelings to receive a cruel reminder of why they don't express those emotions and feelings
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 01:31 AM
–

No, you made it pretty explicit "men don't care". You're casting judgment on 4 billion people (conviently excluding yourself because you're not like the other guys teehee) over the actions of less than 1% of that 4 billion. You're a pickme
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 10:10 PM
–

Were the majority of men violent criminals? A sizeable minority? No. It's less than 1%. Why does the 1% represent the 99%? Stats teachers have failed to educate the people.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 09:42 PM
2

It's busted. I'm not that happy <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 09:20 PM
–

You saw a crackhead on the street and decided that means all men are bad. I can extrapolate the exact same thing. I used to ride the bus a lot and there were several women who would get on my route and shout to themselves incoherently. From this experience I can conclude that women are all rude and uncaring. That's the flaw in your logic. You're judging one demographic by extreme minorities, and excusing the extreme minorities of another. More important than that I have a pressing question. How …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 09:05 PM
0

I have to imagine the unhappy lady doesn't enjoy cooking, so she's sees this as someone doing something they don't want to do to impress someone. To someone who enjoys cooking (like me and probably the original poster), this is a way to share something you love with someone you care about. Unhappy lady should enjoy a nice home cooked meal so she can chill out.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 05:49 PM
4

An old friend of mine moved to Texas because, among other things, there were too many liberals in California. Now I see him reposting stuff saying the election is rigged.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 05:31 PM
1

That's just a link to the post. Be specific. Post a screenshot if you don't know how to link to specific comments. I'll take your deflection as an affirmative. Okay, so contrary to your claim in the title of the post there is someone telling men that being nice will lead to sex and her name is Lilith.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 05:00 PM
1

"Most of you are claiming that you're mad that someone told you that can't get girlfriends because you guys are unlikable" If in fact "most" of us are saying, you should be able to find a plethora of quotes. Show me five people saying what you claim they are. I'm waiting with bated breath. I'd also really like to point out how much you're going against the point of the main post. Please tell me which is true. Does being agreeable matter to relationships, or does no one tell men that being nice w…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 04:21 PM
–

You mean when the ancient greeks wrote how they used math to prove the world was round?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 01:52 PM
1

Kids would say they want friends that are fun, cool, or silly. That's what they like. Kids don't give a shit about aggreeable. I never said I didn't. You have this black and white view where you're either agreeable or disagreeable. You seem unwilling to accept that a middle ground exists, or are that spectrums exist. If your primary personality trait is that you are agreeable, you have no personality. It's the case of trying to appeal to everyone makes you appeal to no one. Agreeable is not what…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 05:10 AM
3

Why did it matter if he was a virgin? I don't mean that as a gotcha, I'm curious what difference it made to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 04:44 AM
–

Were you oppressed for centuries? I can't imagine you're centuries old. So that means you're resentful for things you never experienced. You talk about this like it's a war you're fighting in. It's a war you were never part of. You didn't march for the right to vote. You didn't fight for the end of discriminatory hiring, or push for protection from sexual haarassment at work. People have this strange habit of talking like they personally experienced the struggles of their ancestors. There's not …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 04:41 AM
4

You don't feel the same way. You've been pretty vocal about how you wanted a virgin. That seems kinda weird to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 09:26 PM
0

Cite me the part that says "men tumble everyone in emergencies" and I will beg for forgiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 08:11 PM
0

I was just making fun of your imaginary citation but... "There are, however, several reasons to believe that men have better survival prospects than women, if they do not engage in self-sacrificing helping behavior. The most important argument would be that men are physically stronger than women." From the study The study does not support the idea that "men tumble everyone" or that "They don't give a fuck if even their family and children will survive". You're lost in the sauce.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 08:05 PM
1

It's joever 😢
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 05:52 PM
1

Fellas is it rape if the gag gift I bought for a cryatal girlie turns out to be a monkey's paw that turns into a disaster?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 05:52 PM
0

I stumbled across mentioning of a study that said women eat babies.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 05:41 PM
4

I doubt a child would answer "pleasant" or "agreeable" if you asked what they like about their friends. Neither of those words is in the top 10 of traits I look for. I'd agree that people don't like disagreeable, but pleasant and agreeable are synonyms for a pushover. People don't like pushovers and sycophants. Someone who prioritizes agreeableness probably has no personality. I'm not gonna put the words in your mouth so can you get to the part where you relate agreeabke coworkers to dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 04:07 PM
7

Stuff like this why you're a troll, you refuse to answer questions. You argue everything in bad faith. I'm not even a red piller. Open your eyes and look at the flair. You're bringing up coworkers to deflect from the fact that you have made the exact point you're arguing people don't make.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 03:18 PM
6

What argument are you trying to make ny bringing up coworkers and roommates?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 03:12 PM
8

I didn't say it was a direct quote. That's why I used "ergo". Free English lesson for you, you're welcome. https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/51PBEnjFM8 Here's your most recent post about agreeableness. It's hard to sort through your literal hundreds of posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 02:26 PM
8

Where did I say that?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 02:04 PM
3

So, what difference does it make? It seems as though nothing is changed by what you said
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 01:40 PM
29

You made several posts arguing but that being agreeable would help with women. Ergo, you told men being nice would eventually lead to sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 01:35 PM
2

Amazonians are the inhabitants of the Amazon jungle. Amazons are a mythical society of women warriors from Greek myth. Amazons aren't real.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 05:58 PM
1

You often call people shallow for considering looks. Why does it seem like you don't think a height prefence is shallow?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 02:14 PM
2

It's amusing to watch the same few women constantly circlejerking each other in the comments of main posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 02:02 PM
2

Wish it was me
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 12:39 AM
1

A man of the future
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 06:11 PM
1

What's your partial responsibility. I paid to have a message written on an artillery shell in 2023
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 06:03 PM
1

I had a flash in my mind that you're a kardashian lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 04:24 PM
1

That sucks. Why did you need bodyguards before being a professional athelete? Are your parents rich or famous? I guess they'd have to be to afford private security
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 04:11 PM
2

Why did you have what sounds like a bodyguard?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 03:56 PM
1

Why would you use a garbage AI slop version instead of an actual image from the movie?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 03:55 PM
1

What is a layperson in this context? There's no formal education on this. Also shouldn't you be saying the exact same thing to OP? She's a layperson making sweeping generalizations?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 07:30 AM
–

Kitchencels is where I go for food and unhinged people
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 11:50 PM
8

This isn't a hot take. Dazed called her and similar women the Andrew Tate for girls in 2023. Of course the main difference is the manosphere wormed it's way into national and even international politics, while even in PPD barely anyone knows who sheraseven is.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 11:46 PM
2

"Thing is, baseline attraction means "I can fuck you and NOT be repulsed by it", but what guys really want is women overwhelmed with lust and thinking with her vagina....which is not the norm." I'm quoting your words. Don't backpedal now. Why do I need to explain the middle ground? How is it not self evident? Do I need to spell out the most basic of concepts? If we start at "not repulsed by" we could move up to different levels such as "vaguely attracted" "partially attracted" "moderately attrac…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 09:44 PM
1

My comment had an actual question to follow my strawman. Yours was nothing but an all caps strawman. Baseline attraction is a lot more than not repulsed. Your argument is predicated on attraction being nothing at all or incredibly horny. There's a lot more. Let's see what the dictionarysays: the feeling of liking someone, especially sexually, because of the way they look or behave. Are you going to argue that liking someone is the same as not being repulsed by them? Your definiton of baseline at…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 08:30 PM
2

Strawman me more. I asked why you'd date someone you're not actually attracted to, not why date anyone you aren't incredibly horny for. There's a massive gulf between "not repulsed" and "horny for you as soon as you pop into their line of sight". Your next line is "I know what men really mean"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 07:38 PM
-4

It goes from "women had to wear heels" to "some women in specific jobs had to wear heels on the job".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 06:58 PM
2

If I told a woman on a date "I think you're not repulsive" I'd probably get a drink thrown in my face, and I guarantee she'd walk out. If "not repulsive" is the best you can say about someone, why would you even date them? Apparently men should be chasing after women who see them like I see a brussel sprout.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 06:53 PM
2

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 06:37 PM
-8

There is no point in history where women were forced to wear high heels. What are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 06:35 PM
–

Telling aomeone to prove they aren't a whale isn't a subtle insult or backhanded compliment. It doesn't fit your definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 04:51 PM
3

Actually, it's you telling the brussel sprout to be happy that someone isn't repulsed by it. "If a woman is on a date with you, she's most likely already thinks you're baseline attractive" You seem to think men should be satisfied with a woman who, at best, doesn't find him repulsive.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 02:35 PM
1

I think she meant more like for a dog with rabies
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 04:34 AM
1

I don't think they're describing assisted suicide lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 02:23 AM
15

"Not be repulsed by" is NOT baseline attraction. That's so far beneath attraction it's hard to fathom, pun intended. I'll use an analogy to illustrate how far off the mark you are. I can eat brussel sprouts and not be repulsed by them. Do I like them? No, I tolerate them. You described tolerance, not attraction. There's no point engaging with anything you said beyond that statement. Once again Lilith is proving herself to be an asexual in denial.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 02:19 AM
3

The mpreg fanfics are down the hall and to the left
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 02:10 AM
3

Before I talk about your argument I'd like to point our that you did not answer my 2nd question. I'll ask again. Why do you believe it's soley the responsibility of men to change when both genders have their own problems? The main problem is that, at it's core, this whole argument boils down to the tired "just respect women" platitude. This platitude ignores why people form relationships. There's millions of misogynists in relationships. It's quite clear that attraction plays a significantly gre…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 02:09 AM
4

You didn't explain how ego death could solve this problem. I don't think you know what ego death is given how irrelevant it is to what you said. You explained how both women and men are having problems. Why is the onus of change exclusively on men?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 11:02 PM
17

Women in poorer countries respect your status. They don't respect you as a human, they respect you as something with power. In my travels, women in Northern Europe treated men with the most respect, and seemed to care about my job less than other countries. The caveat is that I was a foreigner and that my experiences may not reflect the treatment local guys get.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 05:20 PM
–

Most markers of human attractiveness are things that signal health and fertility. Breasts signal fertility, just like wide hips. Humans have specifically evolved prominent and permanent breasts for sexual selection.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 03:45 PM
–

Am I not meant to debate in the debate sub?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 03:54 AM
–

So, it's just a feeling with no evidence. Your friends don't feel the same, or you'd say so. You clearly haven't done the market research. The demand for sex workers from women is slightly higher than the demand for orange juice and toothpaste flavored soda.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 03:44 AM
–

The argument you make in point 1 doesn't support the claim that women don't choose their abusers. It's an argument for why they don't leave abusive relationships. Unless you're arguing they're conditioned to seek out absuive men. If that's the case, you're explicitly arguing they do choose their abusers. Point 2 continues the false notion that every abuser is some machivellian manipulator. It's not true, and you even point out how. You explain at length why women give chances to abusive men. Tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 01:52 AM
–

Why do you think it would be profitable? Are your friends clamoring for this too? I'm pretty sure it's a niche service in Japan.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 12:50 AM
12

People bring up Tom Cruise's height all the time, especially if you mention Nicole Kidman.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 08:55 PM
4

It's easier if you only count PIV. You refuse to do oral. You also you refuse to use your hands, your husband's hands, or a vibrator for stimulation. You are stubbornly self-defeating. Sex is not "for men", you're just insistent on doing it wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 03:08 PM
–

It doesn't work, it just makes you self-hating with a headache.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 02:00 PM
6

Who cares if you shouldn't need more? It's a biological reality that you do. It's not a societal injustice that can be remedied. It's also a biological reality that you have an orgasm button that you refuse to stimulate during sex. You're choosing to stamp your foot and cry that life isn't fair rather than do anything to make yourself happier.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 01:54 PM
4

"I've tried nothing and I'm all out of ideas" You are the source of your own problems. You seem unwilling to try anything that could help you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 01:43 PM
–

I can't imagine she'd have a peachy time explaining the situation to the authorities after that ending.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 07:22 AM
–

Tell me you didn't see the movie without telling me you didn't see the movie.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 06:28 AM
37

If you can't attract women, being respectful won't change that. If you can attract women, being respectful won't change that. No woman has ever looked at a man and said "he's poor abd ugly but he's respectful so I like him".
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/26 01:48 PM
8

The thing with complicated problems is that they're complicated, and throwing out a single answer like "female objectification" as an answer will always be inadequete. The answer to your question could fill up a book.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/26 06:11 PM
1

I'm pretty sure making men feel unwanted is not the desired outcome. It sounds like you're against the venture entirely and throwing out unrealistic hypotheticals that would make it okay to you. Despite it being illegal in most of the country, prostitutes live normal lives. They have other jobs. They get married. You sound like you have a rather prudish understanding of sex workers. Go look at the reddit sub. It's mundane. You sound like a right wing extremist when you lament losing that child-b…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 10:15 PM
4

Women want men who can provide. That's what I said. That's why they marry men who make more money. He can provide if he has to, or if she wants him to.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 09:07 PM
1

"They will be less likely to do it" kinda kills the point of the program existing in the first place. That's also just coercion, plain and simple. That kind of employment contract would not be legal in the US. Why are you morally against it? What's the moral wrong? There's tens of thousands of illegal prostitutes with kids right now. The biggest change would be the job being legal. What is the ethical issue? Explain it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 09:01 PM
1

Sterilization programs are a shameful part of the 20th century. There is no way to perform them ethically, so they typically just do them unethically. Legally denying anyone the right to children is a draconian practice, and most often used as a tool of ethnic cleansings. You are weirdly insistent on putting yourself in the Eugenics camp this week.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 08:40 PM
2

So the prostitute got pregnant, tracked him down somehow, dumped the kid on him, and then disappeared? This situation doesn't make any sense. Which is exactly the problem? You've concocted a fake scenario for the purpose of being morally outraged. You're ragebaiting yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 08:17 PM
6

I know a single couple where the man makes less than the woman. That's not a coincidence. If women weren't looking for relationships where the man makes more, you'd see a more egalitarian spread. I don't it. A majority of women look for a man who can provide for them. This isn't a controversial idea outside of gender war forums.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 07:58 PM
3

You're imagining a scenario where a man is alone, but also has a child. How did this happen? You invent a preposterous scenario to justify a nazi-like solution.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 07:52 PM
–

No
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 01:16 AM
0

Why mention the study and not link it?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 01:08 AM
0

Is that why violent crime is near all time lows?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 08:03 PM
–

Bare minimum and average aren't synonyms. If the bare minimum is above average that doesn't change what average is.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 12:49 PM
–

Uganda is about 2x as far from Ithaca as London. So no, a wasp is closer in just about every measureable category to a greek than a Ugandan.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 04:24 AM
2

Join a monastic order and swear vows of poverty and chastity.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 08:17 PM
2

"I never said shouldn't do that. I said they should limited in doing that" The distinction you've drawn is non-sensical. Why argue that you never said they shouldn't and then in the very next sentence make the argumemt for why you think they shouldn't? What do you get out making contradictory statements?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 08:12 PM
3

Yes, tell me more about how the people you deem inferior shouldn't have kids. That will make you sound less like a nazi.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 06:52 PM
8

Is there any evidence that parents in Sweden are more psychologically healthy than they were 60 years ago? You're operating off an idea that psychologically unhealthy people aren't having kids. I don't believd that at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 06:50 PM
2

"I'm not promoting Pepsi. I'm just saying it's a tasty drink". Pedantic quibbling over exact definitions does not change anything. You're openly admitting you think eugenics is good.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 06:48 PM
3

I don't know how you claim to not be advocating for something, then say it's a good thing in literally the next sentence. You are in fact advocating for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 06:42 PM
1

I'd appreciate it but I'm also paranoid so I'd wonder what you were trying to get out of me.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 03:20 PM
1

It's a good horror movie. It's a good take on the monkey's paw "you'll get what you wish for and you'll regret it" trope. Fantastic acting and excellent use of lighting throughout the movie. Gender warriors think the movie proves them right. Pay them no mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 01:43 AM
7

Literally 7 hours before you made this post you made a post saying that dating apps don't work. You're lying when you claim you have no issues with apps. You posted 14 days ago about socialization being exhausting and used the exact words "I don't put myself out there much". You're lying when you say you go to events in person. This is a troll post. Mods should ban you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 12:55 AM
12

You don't need to call me out like that
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 04:54 PM
2

I'm 31. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 04:04 PM
5

It's "tit-for-tat"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 03:29 PM
7

I've never seen any cis woman try to dissuade a man from dating a trans woman. However, you'll find no shortage of women declaring that they won't date a man who has been with another man or a trans woman. It's all part of how women continue to support toxic masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 06:31 PM
2

Are you checking their sent messages to see that they aren't messaging cis men, or are you making assumptions?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 06:18 PM
1

I should have used google I guess. That killed most of my argument... There is still one distinct difference. Most of these women are not in a relationship. Husband material became negative because men in relationships were compared to hookup material. It seems to be single women who are getting called wife material and hating it. I wonder why.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 02:58 PM
2

I don't think there's any significant amount of women that think that. I searched "wife material" on reddit and found posts of guys calling women wife material (often in a funny context), or not wife material. I searched "husband material" and found dozens of posts about why husband material is bad. I searched "wife material is bad" and the best I got was this post from askwomen, where most women are fine with it, but a few find it misogynstic when men call women not wife material. All that is t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 02:31 PM
2

I dated one. I was friends with another.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 02:18 PM
2

I'm explaining that they don't actually have that reaction. It's contrived as a response to the negative associations of husband material. Husband material was fine but gained a negative association by being compared to hookup material. Wife material's negative associations are fake, drummed up for this exact scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 02:13 PM
2

What I'm saying is that husband material wouldn't be bad if this comparison wasn't common. There is no equivalent situation involving wife material. There's no comparison poking a woman's insecurities involving wife vs hookup material. It seems as though what you described was constructed as a comeback for the negative associations of husband material. It's not real.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 02:04 PM
5

All over the internet you'll guys talking about being told they were husband material, but not hookup material. That opens a question. "Why am I not hookup material?" The charitable interpretation is that it's an unflattering and roundabout way of saying "you're too good for one night". The immediate interpretation of most men is "because you're not hot or interesting enough to hookup with". This exact framing is mostly why husband material has gained a negative reputation. There's no similar di…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 01:47 PM
17

These women spend most of this video talking about money. They never say the words "self-actualized" or "emotionally available". They have one or two throw away jokes about men in therapy near the start. Their argument is that men are not worthy of marriage because they don't have enough money. These women explicitly called poorer men losers. They made it clear that in their eyes a man needs money to get married, not therapy or emotional self-work. These women support at least one of the 6s in t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 04:20 PM
2

What exactly do you think raising one's standards will accomplish?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 01:03 PM
11

Lilith: Women don't do X Us: Here are examples of women doing X Lilith: Well, they're shallow and you wouldn't actually want them. This is you moving the goalposts. Your previous arguments have been about how unselected men must be unlikeable or disagreeable. I guess you saw too many examples of disagreeable hot guys who have no trouble and had to change your tune. Honestly it''s an incredibly misanthropic take from you that basically anyone who follows base insticts is bad, and bad forever at t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 12:56 PM
–

ND and NT people more often than not have a lot in common. The fact that you think otherwise says more about you than anything else
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 09:34 PM
1

It's about 1700 women and 1000 men murdered by intimiate partners. Your asinine statistic just shows how much more likely men are to be murdered in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 08:00 PM
4

I used to follow an artist who made cyberpunk 2077 art. I stopped following him because he went full AI and started producing exactly what you described while going on rants about how revolutionary his slop was. I hate AI images.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 02:39 PM
2

It's joever, but I knew that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 01:37 PM
1

Where do men virtue signal about attraction? Porn is most certainly NOT virtue signalling. The point of the novels example was to show that consumption habits don't follow the virtue signalling. That the woman in the screenshot can claim women have diverse tastes but reality says differently. Ngl, I don't understand what you're trying to say in your second paragraph.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 01:22 PM
–

"Just let the Russians invade you, destroy your language, and erase your culture. If you don't, there will be brown people in your country. That's worse". I'm American. I'm beginning to think you're Russian.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 05:17 AM
–

Russians are invaders, not relatives. This isn't a family spat it's an attempted imperial conquest.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 05:06 AM
–

"Slavic brothers" you mean the people actively invading their country? The people bombing them?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 04:57 AM
–

"You don't read what I say... I'm not reading anything else" Can't make this shit up.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 12:18 AM
4

Unjustified crashout imo. Why should I use direct quotes when you're happy with hyperbolic fake quotes? I'm not even a blackpiller. I was just pointing at the obvious similarities between you and them. Don't get mad that you choose to talk like them. You wrote a long paragraph about behavior mattering but buried the lede with "as long as he meets her looks threshold". If you meet the threshold, you don't need to compensate. If you don't meet the threshold, you can't compensate. Not to mention th…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 11:27 PM
4

If a guy started talking about his genetics blocking him from dating he'd get banned for black pill ideology. Why do you care if people call a spade a spade?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 08:35 PM
2

"Okay honey, I've set the tripod up. Walk away and then act distraught when you come back and see me with the diesel pump. It'll look great on instagram"
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 05:48 PM
6

Women virtue signal about attraction, especially with celebrities. https://people.com/celebrity/game-of-thrones-peter-dinklage-doesnt-believe-the-sex-symbol-talk/ Women gushing about celebrities means nothing. See if you can find a romance novel written by a woman where the male love interest is short. I'll be impressed if you find one.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 05:37 PM
3

You literally cannot become a millionaire in 8 years on the average salary, unless you invest your entire salary and spend nothing. So you didn't become a millionaire by saving, you became a millionaire by getting paid significantly more than average.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 01:43 PM
5

Boomer post. No one becomes a millionaire by saving money. You become a millionaire by getting a bigger income.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 01:28 PM
3

The problem is one side always takes the absolute strictest interpretation of need, including only the minimum needed for survival. I've only really seen this definition used here. You can see people all over the internet say things like "kids need a balanced diet" and you don't often see pedantic people come out of the woodwork to say "nuh-uh, kids don't NEED a balanced diet, they won't die if they only have chicken nuggets and lemonade".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 03:52 PM
2

There's nothing wrong with it. It's just that no one believes absurd statements like that. Most people think you're lying, I think you're using definitions of "attracted" that only make sense to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 05:22 AM
–

Some of the people on this sub have a goldfish memory and they forget what they were arguing against after 2 or 3 comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 02:08 PM
4

And they are bad examples that are nearly worthless to draw conclusions from, which is my point. A handful of cherry picked comments is not proof of anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:56 AM
2

If you had the ability to explain a flaw in my reasoning you'd have done so instead of saying the equivalent of "no, you're wrong".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 11:30 PM
2

If it had been immaterial it would have been thrown out by the judge. It wasn't, which means a legal professional with more qualifications than you or me decided it was relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 11:07 PM
1

Less than you'd think. Studies like this show that your appearance affects how people judge your personality. Beautiful people are rated as having better personalities.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 11:06 PM
2

It proves a pattern of violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 10:26 PM
6

You ignored most of my comment. Is it not possible that negative commenters are all from the same small community? Your "proof" is two twitter posts. If you had done any kind of serious data analysis you'd be posting that as evidence instead of two social media links.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 05:21 PM
1

No, they treat tallness as authority.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 02:00 PM
1

They are.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 01:24 PM
3

When I was fat I considered fat women to be on the same scale (pun intended) as me, but it seemed like they didn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 01:23 PM
0

I was a kid back then. I was happy with most of my blockbuster finds because I had the terrible taste of a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 01:15 PM
10

Anonymous internet comments do not prove much. My main issue is that all of the comments could be made by the guys who view women negatively in that study. There's no way to prove either way because of the nature of comments. However, a handful of determined trolls can have a massively outsized impact. I'd say it's far more likely to be a small handful of hate filled losers who spend all day on the internet. Think about how prevalent incel terminology is on the internet compared to their numbers…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 01:13 PM
1

I'd stay because she unintentionally soothed my insecurities.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 11:01 PM
2

Could we apply that to other aspects of the relationship? Something like "if she wants him to put the toilet seat down but he doesn't want to that's too bad"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 03:58 PM
2

Looksmaxxing is for suckers. Radiationmaxxing is the future
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 03:48 PM
1

You called the statement coercion in this comment. That's what I originally replied about.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 03:43 PM
2

That quote was from the guy earlier in the thread, not an accusation towards you
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 03:38 PM
1

Prove what?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 03:29 PM
1

How what?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 03:26 PM
1

"I don't like you being vanilla with me but kinky with other people" is a clear statement of what someone doesn't like. How is that any different?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 03:23 PM
4

Sounds like coercion because if they say no you'll end the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 03:18 PM
1

How would one go about stating wants in a non-coercive way? If my girlfriend tells me "I don't like it when you leave the toilet seat up" is she coercing me? That sounds like a threat to leave
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 03:06 PM
3

Stating wants in a relationship is healthy communication. It seems to me that you think it would be better to instantly break up rather than talk about what you want, because expressing those desires is coercion.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 02:50 PM
5

How is that coercion? Coercion requires threats.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 02:41 PM
2

You're not a buddhist monk.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 01:36 PM
1

Then you don't understand what makes it "brutal"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 11:46 PM
1

You're assuming people are as obsessed. That's why you keep mentioning him in this thread when no one else is. The guy you were replying to posted a finacial times article which you ignored to start ranting about red pill influencers. Every comment you post about about clav is clearly mocking him. I'd go as far to say you delight in his failures. Don't pretend to be sympathetic about him destroying himself, you think it's funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 11:45 PM
1

I rarely see a guy say hot women aren't for marrying. There's not a lot of women lamenting that their boyfriend/husband says she's not as good looking as the women he used to date.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 11:33 PM
1

You're obsessed with redpill influencers. You've been posting constantly about them, bringing them up completely unprompted in this thread. You seem to assume everyone is else is glued to Clav like you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 10:13 PM
–

Women don't like openly toxic men. Many (most?) are just willing to overlook it in men they find attractive. The only reason this gets brought up is that women insist that women are more virtuous in dating and care more about personality, which is not true. It's not a happy coincidence that incels are almost always ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 02:40 PM
3

Believe it or not, the Spanish and Aztec are both humans. It's not the same. Also Cortez invaded 200 years before the gun fully made spears obsolete. Guns in the 1500s were powerful but every army was still mostly guys with spears. Also the fate of the natives under the Spanish should dissuade you from thinking that's a good choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 07:23 AM
0

Most women not liking casual sex is why it's validating. They're not doing it with everyone. If you're doing it that means you've got something others don't. Also you gloss over the fact that you 100% picked the guys to have casual sex with, you wanted them specifically. Before you even got drunk you picked people to be around, so it was never a random thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 02:49 PM
0

Prioritizing compatability is putting the cart before the horse. If you're struggling, if you're worried about being a dancing monkey, building attraction is far more important. I have as much evidence as you. That is to say, personal anecdotes and social media posts. Going official is not initiating the relationship. The relationship starts before you go official. I chose "initiate" as a word because that is used to refer to things before you even ask them out on a date. You seem to be acting p…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 04:17 PM
0

You can be attracted to people you aren't compatible with and vice versa. That's the point I was going for. I think women go on dates hoping attraction will build and it doesn't, which results in the "no sparks" messages. Going official after several dates is quite a few steps after initiating the relationship. That proves my point, you have the experience of a spectator but you're still giving advice. Is there a reason you ignored the rest of my comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 03:31 PM
0

Compatability has very little to do with attraction, it mostly affects the logevity of a relationship. Attraction is what creates relationships. It doesn't matter how compatible you are if there's not enough attraction. I'd like to point out that your goth girl example is not actually an example of compatability. Wanting a big titty goth girl isn't a compatability thing, it's just the type of girl you find attractive. Comptability isn't type, it's about having shared visions of what a relationsh…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 02:34 PM
2

Memes like this are fairly popular. Very few people actually stand out, man or woman. I don't think a lack of a distinct aesthetic is the primary issue. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 11:13 PM
4

Blanket generalizations are not criticism. They certainly aren't constructive critcism. When you call 95% of men rapists like you did 3 weeks ago, that's not criticism. You're in a debate sub and this post is effectively you whining that people debate what you say.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 02:46 PM
–

My life would be easier if I didn't need to eat and never felt hungry. However, eating food is one life's simplest and greatest pleasures. I don't think it's worth giving up. In the same way, my life would be easier if I had no desire for sex or romance, but those are some of life's simplest and greatest pleasures. If the goal is avoiding pain, then aroace sounds fine. If the goal is living a good life, aroace is not a good idea. This is a pointless fantasy discussion, however. People can't rid …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 05:49 AM
5

Sorry Chudettes, peak male physical fitness is being fat enough to play in the band Crowbar. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 11:14 PM
–

Going gay would accomplish the same thing while not requiring prescriptions, surgeries, new wardrobes, or buying make up. Already, the advice is bad. I live in SF and I can tell you that trans lesbians don't have it easy. It would be much worse in most of the country. This is a troll post.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 02:01 AM
2

https://feminist.org/news/feminism-is-for-men-too/
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 09:33 PM
5

There's no women who prefer short men. There's just women willing to overlook it (pun intended).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 07:01 PM
-1

That doesn't make any sense. Dating is part of your general life, just like a career is part of general life.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 02:34 PM
1

I didn't know there was more than a handful of metal bands from the arab world.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 09:54 PM
2

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 01:26 AM
8

I think social media plays a huge role and you cannot dismiss it. The shit people read online plays into what they think and how they talk. The line between social media and real life is very thin in this terminally online world. To answer your questions: Where do I hear the narrative? Coworkers, friends, family, women's talk shows on TV in a doctor's waiting room etc. It's all the same. Last female protaganist? Heretic (2024). Very fun movie. I would recommend it to any horror/thriller fan. Las…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 08:33 PM
2

https://np.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/s/Qf0Nfc1OFa Video about it FULL DISCLOSURE: I'm linking this video because I don't wanna make my own compilation of posts. I'm not an internet dumpster diver like this guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 05:28 PM
11

Your opinion is contrary to what medical institutions say This link leads to a study that includes the effects of self-dehumamization.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 03:57 PM
10

When you're dying of thirst, drowning sounds like a good time. The idea of "too much water" sounds impossible. In the same way, for a guy who goes through life with no sexual attention, being treated like a sex object doesn't sound like a problem. Pedantic note: sexualization is not "by definition" non-consensual. You can objectify yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 03:38 PM
11

Your first "quote" from the whiner is a strawman, not a word for word quote from a real person. Your example of an unhinged statement is actually a strawman that you wrote. More and more you seem unwilling or unable to engage with what people say. You want to argue against certain points, and you argue against them even if that's not what the other person is saying. Edit: spelling
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 02:54 PM
27

Why don't you follow your own advice? You say "attend more social events, approach more women, develop more hobbies". Why aren't you doing what you recommend? If it is as easy as you make it seem you would not be posting about giving up on being loved in r /sad. Even more confusing, why are you telling men to approach women here while making posts questioning why men approach women on r /2xchromosomes? To answer your question, there are 2 reasons relevant to you. Number 1 is that venting never s…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 10:24 AM
–

That's the most insane thing I've read this month. I'm impressed at how unhinged that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 02:35 PM
9

I disagree. It highlights that attraction is amoral. It counters the idea that terminally single men are single because they're misogynists.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 01:50 PM
21

Tate and Clav have (or pretend) to have what young men want: money, fame, power, women. Young guys who have none of this look to the people who do. There's basically no positive role models who have these things. Even worse, positive role models struggle to compete with the get rich quick schemes that bad actors use. Nobody is looking to Mr. Roger to learn how to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 03:20 PM
–

Move to Afghanistan for a country where there is no left wing party.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 04:48 AM
53

I predict the opposite. I predict a rise in NEETs and hikikomoris in the west. Clavicular isn't the future. The future is young men dropping out of society. The way the economy is going you can expect more and more people to give up on the rat race and go for cheap, easy pleasure. It's lonely and miserable but very easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 03:39 PM
2

Nah. I've seen the outcome on a few people. Unless you were born a man with narrow shoulders and wide hips, you're probably not gonna look better.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 05:18 AM
2

Are you an ugly man? Transition and become an ugly woman!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 05:08 AM
4

Do you think it's possible men don't want to break the law, don't want to have sex with a trafficked woman, or don't want the risk of STDs?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 06:40 AM
10

Appearance affects how your personality is viewed. The halo effect is a scientifically observed phenomenon.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 07:33 PM
2

The study you rely on is about what people believe, not what they do. If you asked "when is the earliest you have had sex" you would see different results. You have no basis to say they they don't do it, just that they don't think they should.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 07:22 PM
7

There's a lot of it. Go find a "matchmaker" and you can get all the non-redpill advice you want. Ultimately the business model is the same as red pill gurus. "Give me money and I'll help you get get a relationship. No guarantees, no refunds".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 06:35 PM
–

Is perfect that much better than good? I don't think it is, so it's a no from me.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 06:30 PM
3

"Why do you think racists should change anything when they are not the ones complaining about racism?" I hope rephrasing your title like that should show the absurdity of placing all responsibility on those affected. Women should change because they complain all over the internet constantly. There's very few people that are happy in the dating world, including you. Men and women need to change so that dating can be fun and rewarding instead of tedious and frustrating.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 01:41 PM
–

This post is self flagellation. You made 3 posts two weeks ago about giving up on love because you aren't good enough. This is your own self-loathing projected onto society. This post is directed at yourself more than anyone else. You need a therapist to help you work through your own self hate. You commented on another post that "only terrible men struggle to date", and yet you post about your own failures to date. Maybe instead of flinging shit you should remove yourself from the emotional pil…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 01:44 PM
2

Many of the people in this thread will say it's an incel revenge fantasy that high n women will struggle to find a good husband. When women in the main threads talk about the same idea I never see the people from these threads tell them they're wrong. It's funny to see people who run in the same circles perpetuate two opposing ideas without ever butting heads over it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 04:20 PM
13

Motte and Bailey. You said the manosphere says women are never criticized and now you're retreating to rarely criticized.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 01:43 PM
8

Based on the words of LilithOfBabylon: That's not the redpill in general. Actually even this singular example is only loosely saying what you claim they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 01:30 PM
8

It used to be obsesity, but I lost weight. Now I'd say it has something to do with my poorly managed mental illness. My height isn't doing me any favors either.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 05:21 AM
1

It makes sense if the leader is an idiot with no plan, just playing it by the ear.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 07:25 PM
5

That's not what a motte and bailey is, don't be ridiculous. It's two different arguments that work together to prove a bigger point. You're really confirming that you just learned what a motte and bailey fallacy is and now you're using it regardless of the situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 02:02 PM
5

https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/9JqT8p9NmJ https://medium.com/@ossiana.tepfenhart/where-have-all-the-good-men-gone-836a1b16d565 https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704409004576146321725889448 https://www.shazam.com/song/1422476716/where-have-all-the-good-men-gone?tab=lyrics https://itemlive.com/2025/12/05/harris-where-have-all-the-good-men-gone/ A five minute google search shows a variety of people saying that from. We've got this sub, bloggers, WSJ columnists, and singers as…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:41 PM
3

They aren't the same thing. They're two things that complement each other. The women who would date attractive scumbags are on the more shallow side of the spectrum. How exactly do you think these are contradictory?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:29 PM
6

In order to be a motte and bailey fallacy, there had to br a more extreme position taken. The person you are replying to did not offer an extreme position or withdraw from it. You seem to be repeating a new term you learned regardless of how applicable it is. It's rather silly
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:17 AM
0

The "men want to be treated like women" is a misogynistic way of controlling men's behavior. It's ironic that it almosy exclusively comes from women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 05:40 PM
1

Yeah, unlike you none of my sexual partners could have overpowered me. I'm exposed to much less risk than you. That's part of why I don't think you believe the 95% number. I believe you have the reading skills to know the study you cited used "sexual aggression" not rape because those are different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 02:25 PM
1

Yeah, unlike you none of my sexual partners could have overpowered me. I'm exposed to much less risk than you. That's part of why I don't think you believe the 95% number. I believe you have the reading skills to know the study you cited used "sexual aggression" not rape because those are different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 02:24 PM
0

That's a price I wouldn't be willing to pay. I don't think you are either. The people you're describing are respecting your boundaries. They aren't raping you. You're comfortable enough to enjoy it. I don't think you believe they are rapists, and I don't think you believe the 95% number. I think it's just a bludgeon for you on PPD. That, or you get off on the danger, but I doubt that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 02:08 PM
10

Why do you associate with people you believe are rapists? You continue to seek out sex with people you think are rapists. What's wrong with you?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 01:44 PM
4

We're just as close to chimps genetically, and far closer behaviorally.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:40 PM
4

Yet not the same. Not to mention the risks associated with pregnancy incentivize selective breeding.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:25 PM
-1

"Tell me all your n-count stories" "Who is asking" Pick a lane buddy
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:19 PM
4

Dude, stop being difficult. That increases the odds of pregnancy, not successful offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:18 PM
0

Biologically, it's true. Any female mammal could mate with as many males as possible and it would not increase the likelihood of successful offspring. Male mammals can mate with as many females as possible amd drastically increase the chances of their own offspring being successful. Evopsych is BS, but your comparison is illogical and misses the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:06 PM
14

In point one you claim you never see women claim to be able to detect bad men. In the title of this post and point two you are declaring that you yourself can tell. Wrap that contradiction up and put a bow on it. You're doing exactly what you claim doesn't happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 02:07 PM
15

I had a friend who was 6'4" with a decent face and a good build. I'd see women stop what they were doing and approach him first. It's clear to me that spontaneous desire exists in women. I've also seen responsive desire, and it rarely seems anywhere near as intense as spontaneous desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 01:48 PM
4

An excellent idea to scare women away and attract gay men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:03 PM
1

It's as real as TV
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 09:53 PM
–

This is a sub that isn't a circle jerk where everyone agrees, and it's not riddled with sockpuppets and karma farmers. That's hard to find. That doesn't this sub is cool, kind, or respectful. It means that I'm confident the users I always disagree with are real people and not troll farms paid to spread misinformation.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 09:49 PM
5

Then you're not paying attention to the social media trends around height.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 06:54 PM
2

Her argument is that dark romance and fantasy don't affect women because "THEY'RE FICTION". That's the entirety of OP's justification. Porn and anime are fiction too, so who cares if they're about hot women who think the boring MC is not like other guys? You're doing exactly what OP did, which is insisting with zero evidence that porn affects how men view dating but romantasy doesn't affect how women view dating. A claim with no evidence can be dismissed with no evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 06:54 PM
7

Just gotta travel back in time 50 years to when a 5'6 guy could be a sex symbol.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 03:13 PM
2

Every promiscuous man I know is a serial cheater.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 02:54 PM
2

It's been a minute since you said it. My bad. I didn't add my own meaning, I explained what your words sound like. How does a 10/10 experience being physically unattractive? Did you have a glow up, or are you not a 10/10? If you were ever ugly or fat you'd know how much better people treat you when you look good. I'd love to hear your explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 08:22 PM
2

Your words ring hollow. You've described yourself as a 9/10. If I take your words at face value it's like a rich person telling poor people money isn't everything. It's quite possible you don't know important looks are because you've never experienced being physically unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 08:05 PM
0

So what romantic things do you do? Do you bring flowers on the first date? Do you pay for the first date? I think not. Romance doesn't have to be defined by gender roles, but most women here seem to think it should be.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 03:08 PM
1

Both are gender roles. Fruit of the same tree.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 02:56 PM
3

The traditions that men created included things like women not being proper citizens. You like patriarchy as long as it benefits you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 02:43 PM
1

I'm adressing your comment, not the OP
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 02:18 PM
0

Move the goalposts some more
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 01:55 PM
1

https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/S3ebqy3aBe https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/bUgQjkgReF https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/EicRjWyv9D
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 01:40 PM
0

Bullshit
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 01:36 PM
–

I've never asked and yet I've still learned. Maybe I'm just unlucky enough to meet people with no tact
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 03:09 PM
8

Lmao Rome, China, and Japan were classical patriarchies. Next to zero women ever had direct power in ancient Rome or feudal Japan, and the only way for women to hold direct power in ancient China was as empress dowager (mother of an emperor too young to rule). You don't know what you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 02:44 PM
2

https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2024/03/07/who-runs-the-world-women-control-85-of-purchases-29-of-stem-roles/ 85% of commercial purchases says otherwise
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 06:58 PM
–

I haven't seen any study that says that. I've seen plenty about higher gross income. It's also a moot point. Women spend most of the money in households. That isn't meant as a "haha wife waste money" boomer joke, but that most of the spending in couples from groceries to gifts is done by women. A married man has less money to spend on himself, especially a married man with children. The idea that a married man will spend more of his money on himself than a single man is divorced from reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 06:19 PM
3

Disposable is income after taxes. Discretionary is income after taxes and necesesities. All else being equal, a married man with a SAHW will have more deductions than a single man and pay less taxes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 05:58 PM
3

What is Kamala doing? She's not in government anymore, she's not doing anything. Wtf are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 05:51 PM
3

Polygamy means multiple marriages. Polygyny is the word you want. Also speak for yourself on the bifurcation.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 01:05 PM
2

So you're saying you'd make judgements based on the past about your partner's current desire for you? That sounds very similar to what the men you're so disgusted by are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 01:45 PM
1

Women don't care about sexual equality in the way you're describing. That's why it's a sarcastic post. The closest equivalent I've seen is how much the man pays at the start. If you wanted to make an argument that's believeable, you'd say women are entitled to the same monetary treatment as the women who came before.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 01:35 PM
1

"Enough" is vague. Quantify it. I don't think you can.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 07:18 PM
4

I interpret your statement as "Anything less kinky than me is vanilla, anything more kinky than me is gross"
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 04:51 PM
–

They use the cyrilic alphabet in Mongolia. Take a guess why.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 06:12 AM
–

"Bromance" seems like an unintentional way to reinforce the idea that men can only be emotionally intimiate in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 02:14 AM
19

Weight, age, and hair are physical things. You can see them. You can't look at someone and tell they're bisexual. So if it's not an looks thing, what's the basis for rejection? The answers most women give are homophobic stereotypes. These include things like fear of AIDs, fear that bisexual men will cheat, and the idea that bisexual men are just gay men in denial. That's why it is homophobic. You push them hard enough and you'll get the reason, and it's almost guaranteed to be homophobic.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:04 PM
5

Rapists are not a large group. The fact that you see superficial womem and rapists as similar enough to compare is evidence of how little you think of these women. It's proof enough for me that you have misogynistic feelings towards women who act in ways you wouldn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 01:47 PM
19

This is basically "no true scotsmen". In your mind, the women who would date a hot jerk don't count as women. They're just bad. It's a fallacious argument. It's also misogynstic enough to rival any manosphere influencer. You've taken an extremely negative and dismissive view towards a very large group of women. It's not shocking to me that an extremely sex negative person like you harshly judges people for prioritizing appearance. It's not something you seem to feel, but for 8 billion other peop…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:28 AM
2

I've only heard people complain about the whitewashing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 12:41 AM
2

Cyberpunk 2077 is my favorite single player game of all time. I recommend it
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 10:25 PM
10

You call yourself an ally but there's venom in those words describing your trans "friends". Who needs enemies when your friend calls you "miserable fat fucks"?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 05:14 PM
–

No he's not
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 07:01 AM
–

Just pretend you know. That's how it's akways been done
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 06:44 PM
–

Plenty of old bar flies
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 04:38 PM
–

Holy shit lmao your comment is just like this video
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 10:16 PM
1

Free English lesson. "Cost" is the past tense. "Costed" is not a word. Remember, the only rule is that the rules don't matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 06:23 PM
1

60 upvotes proves all short men think like that in his world.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 02:41 PM
3

Yes. The key word is "think". I can't know she's interested without asking. That means I'm crossing established societal boundaries like personal space, touching, and kissing without actually knowing if she's interested. If pushing boundaries only applies to explictly laid out boundaries, then I don't mess with those. I don't think that's the only thing that counts, however.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 02:38 PM
6

You write like a red pill influencer, challenging the masculinity of people who disagree with you. Maybe you should change your flair. "The only complaining I've seen about paying on dates is from straight men". Absolutely shocking that the only demographic expected to pay is the only demographic complaining. I wonder why straight women aren't complaining 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 02:28 PM
2

Going for the first kiss necessitates pushing boundaries, unless you ask for permission first. That's an example of pushing an unspoken boundary. The early stages of a relationship require the man to break a bunch of little boundaries, unless you find a very forward woman or a woman sho tolerates a man constantly asking for permission. Some women asked on the last post if "pushing boundaries" meant making a move. Sometimes that's the same thing. I had a woman tell me she wasn't ready to have sex…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 02:11 PM
7

You're literally a 3rd worlder. Indian white nationalists are always funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 08:43 PM
1

Escalation requires you to cross boundaries. Every guy who doesn't explicitly ask permission to kiss the first time is crossing major boundaries, as an example. I've had a woman tell me she wanted to wait and later ended things because I never even tried after she said that. People are weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 02:45 PM
2

From what I've experienced and from what women have told me, if you're not attempting to escalate many women assume you aren't interested at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 02:36 PM
13

According to you. According to women I've met it means the man is serious about you, or the man isn't too nice. It's all a stupid game.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 02:19 PM
10

Many not all. Not even most because I can't quantify it. I also didn't say "like". I said they expect it. Those are different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 02:10 PM
8

Not posting proof. Just call my situation unrepresentative of the general population if you don't believe me.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 01:59 PM
32

Debate point 1: I've never had a relationship end because I pushed a boundary. I've had several end because I didn't push a boundary. Many women seem to expect men to push boundaries, and they lose respect for the men that don't. Personally, I'd rather push a boundary than get another text that says "you're too nice for me"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 01:38 PM
1

That study measured how resilient generations of beetles were to the effects of inbreeding. Care to explain how that applies to human dating culture?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 12:59 PM
4

The study cited is based entirely on beetles. And the only measure of success seems to be resilience against the effects of inbreeding. It's ridiculous to think this applies to dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 09:50 PM
–

Your analogy is silly. "Go to the place where women congegate to receive pitches". For most people, the closest thing to that is a bar.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 09:39 PM
8

I've never paid for an interview. I've actually had my lunch paid for by someone interviewing me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 03:12 PM
1

Burying the lede a little
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 06:49 PM
1

To your question, yes. If he had explicitly asked permission, your answer would most likely not have mattered to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 06:47 PM
6

Cause I'm an alcoholic haha
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 06:33 PM
1

I said if you can't tell if it's appropriate you shouldn't say anything sexual at all. That's not what the guy in the screenshot did. The question about the roommate was an attempt to elevate that you clearly didn't reciprocate. That's pretty close to asking for permission and gettting a no, but he went on anyway. He continued regardless because he doesn't care about your feelings, the insult at the end being a clear sign of that. Gotta respect leaving your youtube video open and your messenger …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 06:31 PM
0

From ladybird "I don’t need to be asked for permission. I’m an adult that can engage with the question or not." This woman says she doesn't care if they ask. From the minxisback "I don't get it cuz for me, when I'm with women, I'm checking in and asking consent for everything I can or feel the need to. They tend to get annoyed by it, however, I do it anyway. It's part of the process for me. Need them to feel safe, happy and pleased at all times." This woman says asking annoys people. Which women…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 05:58 PM
1

It's much more likely that asking permission to ask a sexual question would be seen as "intrusive, suggestive, or uninvited". If you can't read the room and determine if it's appropriate to ask a sexual question than you shouldn't ask them. In a non-sexual conversation, suddenly asking "can we talk about sex" could make someone feel humiliated or offended" There's men in here talking how women tell them asking for consent isn't sexy, but you won't listen. Edited for spelling.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 05:45 PM
1

80,000,000 is eighty million, not eight hundred million which is what you said. That's 720 million less than you said. It's the difference between 1 and 10 people and 1 in 100 people. All your arguments rely on rephrasing what was said to you to make them easier to argue against. I don't need to reply when you argue against things I did not say.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 05:39 PM
3

That seems very silly. To a woman that's not interested, asking permission to ask a sexually explicit question is already crossing a line. The act of seeking permission breaks the rules. To a woman who is interested, asking permission is a way to announce to her "I have low self-confidence and can't read the vibes" which will turn a yes into a no. The guy in debate point 2 asks sexually explicit questions on work IM despite being asked to stop. He's already breaking social norms. He wouldn't ask…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 05:27 PM
0

8,000,000,000x0.01=80,000,000. You can use a calculator if this equation is too hard. Renew cure is a sketchy "wellness" website, not a scientific journal. If "covert narcissism" was anything beyond weaponized therapy speak you would be citing a scientific study.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 05:10 PM
–

Every kid has a chromebook. They can't even imagine a macbook cart. This is an old person experience now. It's painful, but it's the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 10:25 PM
1

https://np.reddit.com/r/relationship_advice/s/8AhiB0c2Ir Here's an unfortunate example of why. The past has a way of rearing its head in the present. In this case, the past reared its head and revealed a lie of omission that ended a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 10:18 PM
3

I'm gonna take your argument to the absurd and say you're not entitled to know, and his past doesn't define his future.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 02:39 PM
3

Why should DV matter if other things don't? It's in the past, and by your words you just need to know that you're not okay with being treated like that. I mean given that you don't know how your boyfriend treated his exes it stands to reason you don't know if was violent with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 02:11 PM
–

You claim to be a grown man but you often imply other men are gay if they look at another man's body. That's middle schooler behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 05:32 PM
–

The way HS whined about not wanting a juice bar with his mom was straight out of a comedy sketch. I couldn't believe he did that in front of his own audience.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 05:27 PM
–

Screamo is an emo sub genre, he was probably in a metal band 🤓
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 12:41 AM
–

The problem with your scenario is woman B isn't making you wait an arbitrary amount of time. If you alter your scenario and keep everything the same except that woman B requires 3 months of commitment before sex, the equation changes a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 05:34 PM
–

Too real 💀
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 04:08 PM
–

At least once a month, but more like once a week, there's a post in advice subs where someone's friends talked too much about their past and now they don't know what do. Even if you're tight-lipped, the people around you might not be. "The past is never dead. It's not even past" -William Faulkner I mention that quote because our past is part of our present. I think it's very strange to conceal it from someone as close as a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 03:59 PM
5

If went out with each woman once, he'd have seen two new women every week. That's not average in any sense of the word. Get better rage bait.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 02:52 AM
41

My problem is that many women love to say that women can sense misogyny on a guy. You can see these women say things like "you aren't single because you are ugly. You are single because you're a misogynist and women can tell". The narrative is that women can supposedly smell the misogyny on incels, but are completely blind to the misogyny of abusers. It can't be both. On an anecdotal note, I've warned 3 women a man was abusive and been ignored by all 3. In one case, I knew the man was violent. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 01:13 PM
3

People who are bad at explaining their thoughts and ideas get used to that sort of thing quickly.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 06:32 PM
2

That seems like a pedantic difference that doesn't really change anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 06:21 PM
2

Every single highlighted comment says they choose based on men. Maybe you don't. It appears other women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 06:16 PM
1

Other women seem to think very differently https://imgur.com/a/womens-casual-partners-are-way-more-physically-attractive-than-long-term-partners-husbands-TViyiCJ
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 05:51 PM
7

When the only thing to judge is apperance as it is in your example, that is the only thing to go off. If I offered you 100,000 dollars or 90,000 dollars, why would you ever choose 90,000? That was a rather silly example from you. If you wanted a good example, you'd throw out something about personality. Mid girl with an amazing personality vs. Prime Sofia Vergara with a BPD diagnosis and a big ego.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 05:49 PM
2

Hisrorically St. Patricks day is the day when I get bright neon signs am too drunk to see them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 05:24 PM
7

If you're not a feminist then it doesn't matter. If you are, then the current patriarchal gender roles involved in dating should be something you are pushing to change. Yet, I don't see any of that from any proud feminist. I didn't even advocate for change. I know I'm in a prisoner dilemna with limited options. The change has to come from women, who are not interested in changing it because it's a sexist aspect of patriarchy that benefits them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 02:21 PM
3

"It's not the same" literally the first words of my comment. You're not even arguing against my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 02:07 PM
7

I thought patriarchal gender roles were bad. I thought a woman like you would be against them. Yet here you are calling them a fact of life. I don't think it's a happy accident that you believe a gender role most women like is reality and therefore unchangeable.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 02:05 PM
3

According to your other comments, you're in a relationship that needs counseling. You need outside intervention to help your relationship and you're still choosing that over being single. If you were actually single you might be believable. However, right now you're a have telling the have-nots that being a have isn't so great.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 01:32 PM
–

It's not the same, but it's similar enough to be easily comparable. You have something that people want but you're telling the people who don't have to just go without. It rings hollow, like a rich person lecturing a poor person about money.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 01:15 PM
1

Hmm, I don't see any linked comments. You'd think if people said it so often it would be easy for you to find them. You have claimed other people are saying those things. Prove it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 11:02 PM
2

"This sub has made it clear" no it hasn't. There's no code phrases or secret phrases. It means exactly what it meant. You're arguing against an opponent you invented.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 11:00 PM
1

You took offense at the idea of wanting to jump into bed with your partner. Why is that a glorified fuckbuddy? You're dodging my questions
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 10:51 PM
5

Repeating a response that doesn't answer the question doesn't make it any more on topic. Why do you seem to think that a relationship is some kind of sexless thing? Please answer based on your own thoughts and real life experiences, instead of your experiences on PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 10:40 PM
3

I asked if you think two people in a relationship cannot desire jumping in bed together. It was a yes or no question. I don't know your answer. My guess is that you'd answer yes based on your response.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 10:28 PM
4

That doesn't answer my question at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 09:02 PM
4

Do you think two people in a relationship cannot desire to jump in bed together on a regular basis? Why do you assume that's a glorified fuck buddy?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 08:27 PM
6

Strawman every time. Go ahead a link a few comments where a man says "women should appreciate a man who's kind and respectful above all else" and where they say they want a relationship where physical attraction isn't important. You won't, because you can't.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 08:25 PM
3

Feminine: marked by or having qualities, features, etc. traditionally associated with women. The traits you described are traditionally associated with men. They are not feminine, but women don't have to be feminine. You live in sexist society and I guarantee you hold sexist beliefs. What should be is different from what is
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 05:50 PM
4

They are. Masculine and feminine both mean traits traditionally associated with men and women respectively. Harmful stereotypes are built into the concepts of "masculine" and "feminine"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 05:26 PM
–

Of course. That's why I called them miserable. However, you fit the "it just so happens" meme perfectly, and it's funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 02:12 PM
–

It's more that your life didn't shake out in a way that proves miserable strangers on the internet are wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 01:49 PM
–

Do you want me to tell you "nobody says that" or "women say that too"? I made an argument, it's just not one you seem interested in addressing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 01:39 PM
–

Yes. Who cares? Why is it anyone else's problem that a small group of peoole on the internet are mean to you? My argument is that you're inventing a problem where ons doesn't exist. None of what you described happens on a large scale in actual relationships Your entire argument is just that some men are hypocritical on the internet. But so are you. Pot meet kettle.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 01:23 PM
–

Lemon dislikes sweeping generalizations of women, but gets mad when sweeping generalizations of men are met with "not all men". I don't see you agreeing with the AWALT crowd, so it seems like you're being very hypocritical. Your evidence in this post is what people say in this sub. You're not painting all men based on what you've seen some do, you're painting all men based on what you've seen some say. Based on that I can confidently say that nothing you're describing is a real problem. You're n…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 01:18 PM
1

No. You're mocking size. Insecurity isn't part of the insult. Being called insecure isn't very insulting, that's why the insult is size. It's an insult. It's meant to hurt people. Nothing about it will ever be virtuous. Why are you invested in defending it?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 01:06 PM
–

Every time lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 06:28 AM
8

You are mocking size, not insecurity. Insecurity isn't part of the insult. That's why small is the adjective. The nature of the insult isn't "this is how insecure people act" it's "this is how people with small dicks act". Stop the cap. Own up to it for Christ's sake.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 01:05 AM
1

Bhutanese shadow dragon garden-grown dark evil pack
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 08:34 PM
3

It depends. If you meant "tolerate" when you said "like", the odds are probably in the range of 1/8-1/4. If you actually meant like, you're approaching lottery odds.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 02:02 PM
4

For the same reason I don't buy lottery tickets. I don't expect to win at those odds.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 01:25 PM
1

It takes seconds to judge appearance, and it's the first thing people do. That's not just potential romantic interests, we judge everyone on their looks before considering anything else. It doesn't matter how funny you are if they already decided you're ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 02:30 AM
39

Why does someone saying they want a partner that respects them warrant interrogative questioning from you?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 03:56 PM
3

What does "Stories about men who started to filter more based on what they want, and showed genuine self" actually mean? To me it sounds like you're describing a man who has options filtering and finding the one that is most compatible. If that's not the case, what are you describing? If that is the case, don't you think guys would be far mpre interested in how he got those options, nlt how he picked the best one?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 03:48 PM
1

You're lurking in enough incel subreddits that they're mentally damaging you lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 10:22 PM
1

Neither have us made a direct insult.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 07:00 PM
4

You have a very aggressive rhetoric but you are very sensitive about getting that energy returned. I'm not attacking at all costs. I'd say I'm not really attacking, and the cost is less than 2 minutes of my break.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 05:05 PM
4

I can't imagine the lack of self awareness needed to describe your insecurity around short men and then mention Napoleon Complex in the same paragraph.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 05:00 PM
3

"Most objective" can still be not objective and biased. It just means ita the closest you can get. "Further testing" is baked into the scentific method. Sounds like you think science is reliable. "It's exactly was proven by science, or like errors of science" This is a gibberish sentence. Do you hate grammar too?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 04:52 PM
5

He never claimed that there were scientific papers on the subject. He countered your claim that observation is unreliable by saying the scientifuc method (including observation) is the most objective method of truth-seeking. How do you think they know women's heart attacks have different symptoms? Was it revealed to someone in a dream? Or do you think maybe doctors around the country observed the symptoms of their heart attack patients and wrote about it? What's with your anti-science kick these…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 04:39 PM
1

https://youtube.com/shorts/79A59SF2r74?si=HU1jlvfVZ_V4oGbx
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 12:04 AM
–

Your first link is to a study that is not peer reviewed. That lack of peer review is not surprising given that it's an evo-psych meta analysis of other studies. Evo-psych is extremely questionable on a good day.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 12:07 AM
–

That 0.05% is the difference between Wilt Chamberlain and Danny Devito. The idea that it doesn't matter is absurd. Modern genetics is nearly 100 years older than the discovery of DNA. Even before that, humans have been selectively breeding livestock and crops for thousands of years. Nobody gives a ahit about chromosomes and alleles outside of a lab or a classroom.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 10:37 PM
8

The percentage of men that get through this filter is unimportant. You assume, with no supporting evidence, that it's an exceptionally high bar for most women. It doesn't matter how high the bar is, if you don't clear the bar it's time to clear out. Don't waste time on people who aren't interested. You're weirdly trying to argue that people should do just that. You should only want exceptional treatment. Why would you settle for someone who treats you like any other schmuck?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 07:12 PM
14

Your last pargraph makes me laugh because it's a red pill talking point. They constantly talk about how if she really likes you the rules aren't rules, so you should ditch any girl that enforces rules. You've said the same thing, just from a woman's perspective. Maybe you should change your flair.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 06:31 PM
3

"Napoleon complex" is a myth. Our tall president has been risking WW3 for months over his raging insecurities and no one is calling it a Napoleon complex. It's not about insecurity, it's a bullshit excuse to justify an existing prejudice.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 08:12 PM
4

Why would it matter if he slept with men? Are you insecure you can't compare to a man in bed? Jokes aside, studies show that women care about sexual history just as mich as men. Women do care about how many normal sex experiences with women a man has had.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 02:52 PM
1

Being worried about AF/BB doesn't make it about anger or moral failings, it makes it about fear. Most men don't feel righteous indigination when they read about AF/BB. The ones who are angry don't care about the morality of it, they're afraid it'll be them. There's nothing that turns people down like a list of expectations up front. I ended a date early when a woman hit me with a list of expectations for the relationship. Dating is meant to be natural and romantic. Stating expectations up front …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 04:43 PM
1

Ex 2 isn't about somthing quick. It's not about anger or moral failings. It's about not wasting time. It's the same as women who won't go on a second date if the guy doesn't pay. Don't bother with a relationship with a person who demonstrates low interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 03:26 PM
24

I'm not implying you made it. I'm stating that you made it because you did. You're such a troll, why do I even bother? Let me illustrate it for you: "Which reminds me, it's also dumb to complain about porn and harem anime. Theyre FICTION. Who cares if men write sex fantasies of conventionally attractive women and thinks the MC is 'not like other guys'? Having fantasies doesn't make them your dating standard." Does this argument hold water?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 02:43 AM
24

Do you not know what you typed? It's a 5 paragraph post, you shouldn't need me to cite your own words. "Because I notice alot of guys here have set up unrealistic expectations that seem to be influenced by porn, harem anime, and/or dating sims. This might also be fueling the insecurities of being settled for because they themselves have not accepted that each dating standard has pros and cons." "Which is reminds me, its also dumb to complain about the Dark Romance and Romantasy genres. Theyre FI…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 02:29 AM
35

You say porn and anime influence men with unrealistic expectations. You later say dark romamce and romantsy do not do this to women because "Theyre FICTION". Wouldn't that apply to porn and anime as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 01:55 AM
4

You use the words "strong in-group bias" in your opening sentence. The studies show the opposite, a weak in-group bias. You seem to think that things like "mansplaining" happen because men assume competence in each other. It doesn't. Misogynists don't have to like men, and they often don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 04:42 PM
19

You're still ignoring scientific studies that prove a significantly lower in group bias in men. You don't have any science to back you up. Hell, you don't even have a study about mansplaining. It seems like you really don't want to accept that your personal beliefs are at odds with multiple peer reviewed studies. Your post contains no science at all. Your post does contain quite a lot of mind reading from yourself. You somehow know what millions of men think and what their motivations are. Unles…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 10:05 AM
–

It literally doesn't. You're not helping anyone. You're making snarky comments on the internet while you do nothing about international pedophiles you supposedly know. A woman marrying a wealthy foreigner is not the same as children being sex trafficked, and treating them the same isn't gonna save anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 08:27 PM
–

It helps no one to be reductive.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 07:59 PM
–

That's a sex tourist, not a passport bro. A passport bro is an unmarried guy that goes to poorer countries to find a wife or girlfriend. They typically live in the poorer country and use their comparatively high wealth to attract women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 07:48 PM
–

The peer reviewed study shows a weak in group bias for men. Which means the men arguing here aren't white knighting for men they don't know because they must defend the honor of men, they're arguing because your posts include blanket generalizations, which means it includes them. You are attacking people, and philosophizing about why they don't like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 03:17 PM
–

You have your lived experiences and I have mine and those don't outweigh each other. However, I also have several peer reviewed studies that support what I've said. You've gone from "...make any point about men in a way that they would listen" to just making a debate. Those are not the same thing. If you want someone to listen, you are too hostile. If you want to debate, you've got it so why complain?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 03:02 PM
–

The idea that there is a "men are wonderful" effect is scientifically unsound. You aren't trying to make anyone listen, you're trying to win an argument. Your posts and comments are typically accusatory and combative, and people return your energy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 02:45 PM
–

Men have a significantly weaker in group bias than women. Look at this study Yes, they interpret is as a personal attack because that's how you word it. Your title is an example of the blanket generalizations you routinely make.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 02:41 PM
3

The "problems" you listed are things most guys already encounter on the apps, with a few prpblems that got exaggerated. They're running into these problems without the advantage of your imaginary app. Sounds like a great app for imaginationland.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 04:57 PM
3

The issue is the hypocrisy and the failure to hold themselves to their own standards. It is easy to meet women who expect the man to be traditonal but aren't traditional themselves. It's very rare to find a woman who doesn't expect the man to be traditional in some or all aspects. You're combing a bunch of different ideas and types of people into one incredibly specific mega idiot. Yeah if some thinks all those things they're an idiot, but I'd imagine most only think one or two.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 04:03 PM
1

You say needing external validation is pathetic, but in the next paragraph you talk about avoiding rejection to preserve your pride. If a rejection hurts your pride it's because your pride is built, at least in part, on external validation. Would you describe yourself as pathetic?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 02:10 AM
–

Windmill is in the comment section. I don't like seeing PPDers in the wild.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 09:06 PM
2

Not only is it a bad comparison, it's the opposite of the truth. Human ears are actually less sensitive to lower frequencies. High frequencies sound louder than lower fequencies. That means the smaller instruments, which are higher pitched, produce more stimulation. There's your science lesson of the day.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 03:30 PM
1

I didn't edit my comment. I don't know what you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 03:00 PM
–

There are a lot of male escorts. The clientele is overwhelmingly male. You have no basis for any of these claims, you're just making shit up as usual.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 01:24 AM
0

I used to think you were misandrist, but seeing how much you hate women who don't strictly follow your rules you're clearly misogynstic too. Seems like you're a misanthrope.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 08:39 PM
–

In the Chechen wars the Russians killed between 100,000 and 300,000 civilians. That's what they do their own people. Do you think they treat foreigners better?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 11:16 PM
–

No surprise he died on Pneumonia. He smoked like a chimney and looked unhealthy all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 07:32 PM
–

Kinda. I made an off hand remark about the Russian invasion of Ukraine at the end of class and he went home and repeated it to her. She told him "watch this video to learn the real story" or something similar and then recommended the channel to him and showed it to me the next day. I've never hated a student or felt as much sympathy for a student as I did with that kid. I hope he's alright.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 07:27 PM
–

Just over 4 years ago a student told me that his mom had him watch a video from a guy called coach red pill. To this day I wonder how a chinese immigrant in her late 40s decided that a greasy passport bro was someone that her son should listen to. I also wonder how she found him the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 06:36 PM
3

Insecure women think they aren't good enough and the man will leave as soon as he gets what he wants. Maybe if they worked on their personality men won't be so repulsed by them that they hit it and quit it. It's mildly amusing to just call people insecure and not actually address any points they make
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 06:01 PM
3

Lots of good looking Jamaican guys love fat American women. A passport bro with a girl significantly more attractive than him is probably paying. There's nothing stopping women from doing that too.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 10:17 PM
8

Your risk perception is irrational. Fear is emotional, not rational. We feel, then we rationalize our feelings. Murder rates are declining. In 2023 about 1500 women were murdered by an intimate partner, while about 900 men were murdered by an intimate partner. You'll often see something like "34% of female murder victims are killed by an intimate partner, but only 5% of male murder victims are". Statements like this ignore that men are 3x as likely to be murdered, which massively skews the stati…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 08:54 AM
2

Old man yells at clouds tier comment. People bitched and moaned and dropped out of life in the past. People grind till they die today. Here's a letter to the editor about this shit from 1986
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 01:58 AM
1

It's an insult. It's meant to hurt. It clearly works or you wouldn't make this post. Why should people not use that insult in particular? What makes it special?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 11:33 PM
6

To prove that redpillers are single you linked an article about dating redpillers?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 08:04 PM
2

You live in the same city/area. You work in the same industry. You're part of the same rationalist movement. You're made from the same ingredients as them. I know you're not the same. I know you don't associate with them. However, to an outsider like me the main difference I see is extremity. I've never heard of any group house, hippie commune, or techie collective that didn't have free love or poly tendencies. When I lived in SF I didn't know anyone who lived in a group houses like that except …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 04:42 PM
1

The rationalist/effective altruism community is your connection to Zizians and tech fascists like Peter Thiel. You've mentioned these communities several times. We've been talking about these communities the entire comment chain. You've advocated for poly life in multiple comments and posts. You compared it to innovation that pushes society foward. Now you're backing off. Why? Your buddy gets paid to talk? Number one, who cares? Mr. Beast got paid to talk at a teacher conference near me, and he …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 05:39 AM
1

You're cut from the same cloth. I don't know much about your community, but I do know that tech-fascists and death cults run in the same circles. "He's thought a ton about modern dating" you could say that about half the people in this sub. That means nothing. Heresay from an anonymous person isn't a very convincing piece of evidence. America had polyamorous communes in the mid 19th century. They make silverware now. You're not an innovator. You're not original. Polyamory is the niche that allow…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 03:32 AM
10

It's pretty easy to call it a cult when it's got people like this. "My well traveled friend" is a vague and meaningless description. You may as well say "my mate paul told me" You live a niche lifestyle. That's fine. Stop pretending your niche has widespread appeal.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 12:49 AM
13

Check her post history.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 12:07 AM
18

It seems incredibly dishonest to omit that your community of group houses is a bunch of poly people in a new age religion. I guess "join a sex cult" has more negative connotations than "live in a group home". You have a fringe lifestyle and your advice isn't applicable to the majority of the population, even in the Bay Area where we both live.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 11:42 PM
1

There's an obvious level of emotional intimacy that is reserved for relationships, even completely platonic things. You don't sleep in the same bed as your friends every night. If you can afford to live alone you choose to do that instead of living with your friends. You don't eat most of your meals with your friends. You don't bring your friends to every family gathering. Even if we do as you choose to do and ignore any emotional differences, there are clear behavioral differences in platonic i…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 06:19 PM
2

I would have thought you in particular would recognize the problem of romance characters. The problem is that love interests of the main character are typically not characters, but just a amorphous blob of desirable traits. I've read a decent number of romance novels and I can't think of a single one written by a woman where I related to the male lead or thought "I wanna be the male lead". In fact I often find male love interests to be somewhat repulsive in the same way I've seen women describe …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 12:46 AM
–

A perk of being a teacher is that it becomes obvious when someone like you is pretending to know anything about what young people are doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 06:40 PM
1

For me personally, I've gotten more dates putting in minimum effort than I have putting in maximum effort. The reason is simple. Effort won't make a woman like you. If you don't meet her minimum effort, she might ditch you. However, if your looks and personality aren't enough on their own, a bouquet and a fancy dinner just mean she might feel bad when she sends the "I don't feel a spark" text. There's not much reciprocity in the early stages of a relationship. Lots of women believe they don't ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 06:27 PM
4

Let's torture this analogy a little more. If you ask for a ham and cheese sandwich, you should be happy getting two slices of bread. Otherwise you clearly only care about the ham and cheese not the whole sandwich.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 09:15 PM
6

Goomba Fallacy Exhibit A <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:27 PM
4

What are you even mad about? "How dare the NFL use one of the most popular artists in the world to attract tv viewers for more ad revenue!"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 09:50 PM
3

They're teaching evolution wrong in schools. A trait being common doesn't make it useful. Things like albinism are common, and often maladaptive to survival. If you had actually ready a study like that you would have linked it. It's a pretty silly assertion because how do two males get offspring in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 10:59 PM
4

I'm impressed by the organization in this post. This is a big improvement from the usual loosely connected stream of consciousness.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 04:02 PM
1

I've never met a fat mormon. I've also never been to Utah or Idaho so maybe that's why.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 07:27 PM
1

How are strippers an alternative in this scenario?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 05:52 PM
2

You use IPV stats to justify why women would be afraid of men they don't know. That doesn't make sense. Women have a lot less to fear from strangers than men. In 2023 the number of men killed by strangers was 6x higher than the number of women by strangers. Going on statistics, women should be less afraid than men. That's all immaterial, however. Fear is irrational. Our brain doesn't use statistics to generate fear.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 03:57 PM
1

Shriners (not shiners), masons, and Knights of Malta (successors of the Hospitaliers) are all old man clubs. Those are clubs that men join when their kids are old enough to move out. That's the problem. Those groups are irrelevant when the focus is young men who feel disenfranchised. The internet has made it easier than ever to be isolated and also made it easier than ever to find extremist groups.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 09:16 PM
1

"Non-refundable deposit" Sounds like an easy way for an enterprising catfisher to swindle people.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 08:07 PM
1

The army loves strong idiots. It doesn't want fat idiots or idiots with noodle arms. It wants the 6'2 cornfed Indiana farmboy with a room temperature IQ, not a skinny, pale NEET with an anxiety disorder.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 10:57 PM
2

Don't be ashamed to admit to a mistake. It takes strength to do that. The upper class in many societies throughout history did not have jobs or careers. They made their money from their land and the peasants. They didn't train upper class women for jobs because the upper class typically didn't work jobs like we do. They weren't afraid of educating women, because education didn't open doors in the past like it does today.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 10:53 PM
0

Why would your wife being black make it more believable she had a "stripper" body? Black women are more likely to be overweight or obese than other races. More than half of all black women are overweight or obese. Is this some kind of racist thing you believe? Your story is not passing the smell check. I wasn't suspicious you were lying until you said that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 03:24 PM
5

Unfortunately yes. More importantly, the kids who do learn Greco-Roman mythology in school typically only learn the Greek version and then get told the Roman version is basically the same. That's why I'd expect someone saying Saturn over Cronus to be into niche stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 01:05 AM
3

I'm genuinely surprised by that answer. If they were afraid of educated women, they would not have educated them. You've kindly pointed out that educated women were more valuable. You're talking about stuff you don't fully understand. A dowry was paid by the family of the bride to the groom's family. The parents of a woman would want a smaller dowry. The opposite, a price paid for a wife, is called a bride price and it was significantly less common (and non-existant in any society that you studi…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 12:23 AM
5

Yeah, an article 15 discharge. That, or you get put in an idiot MOS like 88M. They're not puting NEETs on the frontline.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 11:25 PM
9

Denial of education to women is a recent (last 400 years) trend. Historically, the vast majority of the population was uneducated. Only the upper class were educated. Upper class women were often expected to be educated, even in patriarchal societies like Feudal Japan and ancient Rome. If patriarchy is afraid of educated women, why were the most powerful women given educations? The answer is that patriarchy can't be summarized by a loose comparison to Saturn. The choice of Saturn over Cronus com…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 11:19 PM
6

I would imagine most incels aren't fit for service, so they're not gonna be the ones dying an FPV drone montage.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 07:55 PM
5

Saw "Rashōmon" and thought that people of this thread would appreciate this line from the movie. N count flame wars in 16th century Japan. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 03:51 PM
–

Dating women that don't know you very well beforehand is often a draining experience. These women want you to prove yourself. Rather than trying to build a connection, they're looking for a reason to end it. Dating them is like a minefield. One wrong move and it's over. You think it's just suggesting a cafe? That's because you've never been called cheap for suggesting a coffee date. You've never been called boring for suggesting a dinner date. You've never been called indecisive because you sugg…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 03:44 PM
–

If they suffered in silence you'd be right. Most of them don't. They vent, they seek out sympathy, they go to debate subs and argue etc. They make it other people's problem. If you have friends you've probably experienced it. You've probably been stuck comforting someone while thinking "when are you gonna stop digging your own hole" or something similar.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 04:01 PM
–

This is a cop-out argument when used on a debate sub. Nobody owes anybody anything, but there's nothing to debate if everyone decides "I don't owe you an explanation". We could say that after every statement if we wanted and just kill the sub. More importantly, discussing someone's standards and what they want is very normal and useful when they are struggling. The idea is that you are causing your own struggles by having unrealistic expectations. A lot of men and women self-sabotage themselves …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 03:34 PM
–

Maybe you don't, but a lot of women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 02:24 PM
0

Death Metal band T-shirt, black jeans, black leather boots.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 02:57 AM
2

Certain subs require a minimum karma amount to post. I think having a lot of karma helps you avoid account bans. I've seen accounts that posted on all the easy karma subs like pics and cuteanimals, then they went silent for a bit, and then suddenly it's posting political stuff everyday. It's harder to identify now because you can hide your history.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 08:08 PM
0

Wrong on all three statements.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 06:12 PM
15

No means no
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 04:52 PM
16

"It's a hotter to see a guy face rejection" She rejected him. Why does it matter if it's hot? It's not making a difference. This is a marketing campaign for some speed dating event in NYC created by a sketchy AI company.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 04:26 PM
2

You think the second guy was there for her safety? That sounded like a setup to rob OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 02:54 PM
2

Your example with princess treatment is exactly what I mean. Most women want that treatment. Most women know it's incredibly entitled to expect or demand it, so they're willing to accept what everyone else gets. Universally, no one wants to feel like they're getting less than what others got. When you described the person who goes from casual to serious, you're describing the opposite of what people want. At best, it's special for the woman, not the man. More likely, it's treating a potential pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 07:19 AM
2

You're right. We don't want consistency. We want to feel wanted and we want special treatment. Many realize this is unrealistic, and are willing to accept standard treatment. I didn't gender that because it's true for everyone. Nobody wants to feel like they're getting worse treatment.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 06:46 PM
2

Survivorship Bias "This hypothetical pattern of damage of surviving aircraft shows locations where they can sustain damage and still return home. If the aircraft was reinforced in the most commonly hit areas, this would be a result of survivorship bias because crucial data from fatally damaged planes was being ignored; those hit in other places did not survive. In other terms, “We need to reinforce the other parts, because they made the other planes unable to return.”'
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 04:06 AM
–

"If romance is meant to be seeing someone as more than a sexual partner, why would being treated differently than a casual hookup feel like a downgrade rather than an upgrade?" If you're not having sex you're less than a sexual partner, not more.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 12:53 AM
1

You learned the word pornsick and you use it regardless of whether or not it applies. I have never heard of any man who complained that he couldn't find a woman who wanted a relationship because all the women he was finding only wanted him for sex. That's because guys who can get hookups can get relationships. Hell, I only know of one man ever who wanted a relationship and was sad when all she wanted was a hookup. You and a few other women on this sub have this narrative that hookups only happen…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 04:08 PM
–

They're saying "he had 2 magazines!!!!" as if that isn't a standard concealed carry setup. They're also saying "I wouldn't bring a gun to a protest". People who I know for a fact talk about the 2nd amendment as "the best defense against Tyranny" are saying you shouldn't have a gun at a protest.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 07:14 AM
11

Here is one Here, here, here and here are 3 reddit posts and a blog with a similar vibe.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 08:24 PM
1

"Enhanced" Sure. 39% of Gen Z women say they don't have a religious affiliation, compared to 34% of Gen Z men. Women are leaving religion for the same reasons as men, not because of what happened to pagans 1500 years ago. I believe you when you say that you wrote that with only three hours of research.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 06:38 PM
1

This reddit atheist rant is in dire need of proper paragraph breaks. It's also an AI summary that uses em dashes where it should be using commas.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 05:41 PM
6

This whole post is hilariously wrong. B+ rage bait. Christianity, and religion in general, is on the decline in America. It's not making a comeback. No major christian theologian has ever claimed that the female orgasm is needed for procreation. What passed for a medical community in the medieval period was relying on medical texts written during the Classical period of Greece and Rome. Those same texts that say a woman's orgasm is required for procreation also claim that women are just undevelo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 05:31 PM
–

Only women older than 51 were alive before the Equal Credit Oppurtunity Act passed. However, it's unlikely any woman under 68 actually experienced this injustice. More importantly, women could open bank accounts before the 1974 EOCA. Here is an askhistorians thread about it. If misogyny is such a big problem, why did you have to exaggerate a problem from 50 years ago?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 03:37 AM
0

Wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 04:11 AM
3

Fellas, is it terrorism to hit it and quit it?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 12:26 AM
–

Here's another great recipe
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 07:22 PM
3

Seeing you comment outside the medals on the daily thread is like seeing a minor celebrity in the wild.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 10:13 PM
2

It doesn't matter if you worship it. You describe it like it's a god or a malevolent spirit rather than a category of behaviors. It's no wonder you don't know the solution. I doubt you've even looked for one.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 09:58 PM
3

Wealth is not abstract. It's an abundance of money or valuable possessions. More importantly, wealth can be measured. You cannot measure patriarchy, or any concept for that matter. I'm not totally disagreeing, but I think you chose a really bad comparison. Money directly impacts our lives, whereas patriarchy indirectly influences things that affect our lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 09:41 PM
1

Merriam-Webster definition of abstract: relating to or involving general ideas or qualities rather than an actual object, person, etc. Patriarchy isn't giving out rewards or using weapons because it's not a tangible thing and it has no will of its own. I'd say you've personified patriarchy, but it seems more accurate to say you've deified it. You talk it about like some omnipresent being that rewards the faithful and punishes the heretics. If you want change, you need actionable solutions to cle…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 09:23 PM
9

"Men are rewarded by the patriarchy" Is there a committee handing out medals to guys who harass the most women? "Patriarchy" is an abstract concept. It's not an actual thing, but a description of many combined human behaviors. Blaming the patriarchy instead of specific trends and behaviors makes you lose focus on the actual problem and potential solutions. It's an academic excercise not an activist action.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 05:27 PM
0

Do it yourself and prove it. Go through a bunch of posts. Categorize all the posters and run the numbers for us. Or, stop making baseless assertions and asking others to prove them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 04:53 PM
–

83% of statistics are made up on the spot. You've pulled your 99% number out of thin air.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 04:24 PM
–

Your ability to ignore the point of my comment is impressive.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 08:29 AM
–

It's fully possible for people to want to have their cake and eat it too. It's not possible to do that, but it is possible and common to want it. Without even addressing the topic, this post is fundamentally wrong. The bigger problem is that this is not an example of wanting to have a cake and wanting to eat the cake. You can have sex early and still have a relationship. These aren't contradictions. This shouldn't shock you, but you can go home together on date one and then continue having more …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 11:08 PM
–

40 is literally middle aged.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 09:01 PM
1

The conclusion is about marriage satisfaction, and has little to do with creating attraction. The studies show men and women pick for attractiveness in early dating. You also didn't quote the conclusion, possibly because you recognize that issue too.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 04:36 PM
2

"Yet, despite long-standing consensus, this view has recently been challenged by research suggesting that partner physical attractiveness may be just as important to women as it is to men (Eastwick, Eagly, Finkel, & Johnson, 2011; Eastwick & Finkel, 2008; Fisman, Iyengar, Kamenica, & Simonson, 2006; Iyengar, Simonson, Fisman, & Mogilner, 2005; Kurzban & Weeden, 2005; Lykken & Tellegen, 1993)." Crazy what you find when you read what you link.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 04:19 PM
3

Here you seem kinda proud of yourself 🤷‍♂️. Also you should consider yourself gross based on your recent comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 04:06 PM
3

Last month you were bragging about hookups. Why the switch in opinion? Did you hit your head or something? Or are you just a contrarian?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 03:58 PM
4

Do you have a phone number or email address for science? Oh that's right, science is an abstract concept, and it doesn't actually say anything. Scientists define facts in peer reviewed journals and publications. So, once again, do you have any authoritative source that defines "need" as you have? If biology says it like you're saying, it should be really easy to find one. Right now you don't have any science backing you up, all you have is yourself. We're not in a biology sub, so why would biolo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 07:27 PM
4

According to Maslow's hierachy of needs, that isn't true. There are levels of human need. Can you find me some authoritative source that says "need" relates exclusively to immediate physiological survival? Make sure you find one that doesn't say "basic need" because basic need implies there are advanced needs. You don't need shelter or clothing if you live close to the equator, the natural habitat of humans. Humans want to live in colder places, and use clothes and shelter to make it possible. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 06:11 PM
2

It provides the heat. You're getting any vitamin D. That's also completely dodging the point. Would you be happy in the dark basement with bread and water? All your needs are met after all. You had to be taught to speak. You would not die because no one taught you to speak. Just like you don't need to know how to read to survive. So you don't need your legs? Others will accomodate you, therefore you don't NEED your legs, you just want them. I'm not making the points you want to argue against, bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 04:37 PM
1

If I put you in a climate controlled basement with no lights or windows and I delivered bread and water to you, you would survive. You wouldn't need sunlight, clothing, or the ability to communicate. You'd have everything you need. I wasn't talking about disability. I was talking about skills. You don't NEED to learn human speech, or sign language, or writing to survive. You might WANT them to make your life easier, but you can survive without them. We could apply this to disabilities too. Do yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 04:10 PM
8

Lilith regularly acts like she doesn't understand common metaphors and figures of speech, so it's no surprise she doesn't understand that "need" has multiple levels. Your whole post is a lame argument entirely predicated on defining need based on immediate survival. By the same logic you don't need love, friends, family, entertainment, housing, clothing, literacy, education, the ability to communicate, sunlight, or any food/drink other than bread and water. That list of things we don't "need" is…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 03:48 PM
–

Do you have any rhetorical approaches that aren't strawmanning me with "so you're saying" questions? It seems like reading might not be your strong suit. There is not a massive amount of men with anti-woman ideas in this sub because there aren't many people in this sub and there's even less who regularly comment or post. You're claiming there's hundreds of misogynists in the comments every week but there aren't even hundreds of commenters period, misogynist or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 05:30 AM
–

There aren't hundreds of commenters in this sub. It's mostly the same people. I'm not comparing one to hundreds, because there aren't hundreds. I'm talking about the people who make most of the content on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 04:01 AM
–

I don't know what either of us gets from deleting our accounts, so no. In the last 5 days Lilith alone made that many posts angry at men. Some of the other regular posters like windmill haven't been active in the last 5 days, but they'll be back. I counter with one person doing the ragebaiting of 5 people. "A lot more anti female posts and comments by men than anti male posts and comments by woman" is pretty far from "single men seem very angry and bitter in ways that women aren't". I'd also onl…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 03:43 AM
–

I don't think you can. I don't think there's that many active people in this sub. Lilith is just one name, and the most prolific poster, in a rogues gallery of haters. There's not a lot of positive people in this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 02:40 AM
–

Go read one of the three daily lilith posts and tell me that single women aren't bitter and angry, or that women on this sub lash out less.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 02:14 AM
-3

I've interacted with hundreds of dogs and only been attacked by 3 of them (and the first time was my fault). There's little to gain by living in fear of all dogs, dogs are great.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 03:29 PM
-5

I got attacked by dogs as a kid twice, and once as an adult. It didn't make me afraid. When I was an adult the attack put me in the hospital for a week. I love dogs. I could be afraid of every dog and rattle off bite statistics to justify my fear, but what would that accomplish? Maybe I wouldn't get bit again, but I certainly wouldn't have any positive experiences either.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 03:08 PM
1

As others have said, it has nothing to do with the madonna-whore complex. It's a revenge fantasy. The "womenbad" portion of redpillers believes women who behave poorly (in their opinion) deserve punishment and ostracism. They justify it by saying single mothers lead to crime and so on. They don't care about a social problem, they want cosmic justice against people they don't like. I don't think you really even understand Madonna-whore complex. The psychoanalysis idea is that some men cannot love…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:36 AM
2

If you were young in the 2000s, you almost certainly did not write letters outside of rare occassions. Unless you weren't young, in which case your experiences in the age of dating apps would be very different than that of a woman in her 20s, 30s, or even 40s, so your whole line of reasoning is baseless. I think you're too young to have any experience with analogue dating services or too old to have any experience in the world of dating apps and instagram. Your whole claim is a massive misrepres…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 10:46 PM
2

I'm doing my part!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:41 PM
2

Witches were hanged in America.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:24 PM
8

When I was in college I had a friend who went on a date with a guy who she only knew through Instagram before the date. He lived 8 hours away. That kind of thing didn't, couldn't happen before social media and dating apps. Things are different. This shouldn't be a controversial idea, the internet has reshaped human habits across the board.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 02:46 AM
–

The poor ethics of porn are weak excuse to justify a dislike that already existed. Everyone tolerates, excuses, or ignores the unethical practices in industries they use.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 12:43 AM
2

A chart with no citations, how scientific.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 12:51 AM
3

I'd like to live in a world where a short, autistic community college dropout with no friends is good looking, high status, and well educate man.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 05:19 PM
1

Elliot Rodger believed that being a "supreme gentlemen" made him entitled to attention from women. He did not believe nice guys finish last. Not sure how you confused that. If Elliot Rodger wasn't an anomaly, you'd be dropping other names. Incel murderers are incredibly rare because most incels are too passive and conflict-avoidant to act on what they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 05:18 PM
14

"Woman want to be approached." Not according to this thread. I found this thread full of women who said they do want to be approached. Look at the ones who say they do and none of them are saying they're boyfriend did this. The women who say they want to be approached don't seem to get their boyfriends from cold approaches. There's a lot of women who don't want to be approached. If you find women who do want to be approached, you can't expect to have a good success rate. The risk to reward ratio…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 04:15 PM
7

Nice guys finish last applies to much more than dating. The nice guy is less likely to prioritize himself and less likely to be okay hurting others or crossing boundaries to get what he wants. The guys who are focused more on themselves and willing to cross boundaries have an advantage in the game of life. This applies to lawyers, businessmen, entertainers, atheletes, and pretty much everything else. Nice guys finish last is just saying that being nice won't get you what you want. That women are…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 03:47 PM
4

If she's into you, you don't need to taker her to a chic restaurant. If she isn't into you, a chic restaurant won't change that. "Courting" is the most expensive and time intensive way to get a girl to text you that she doesn't feel a spark and she sees you more like a friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 03:27 AM
2

You have gender dysmorphia. You do not represent the average woman. I can see your post history, so don't deny it. You've said that you aren't comfortable in your own skin. I agree, you are not cis. You don't like being appreciated for your body because you feel you are in the wrong body. If you didn't have dysmorphia you wouldn't be thinking these things. Talk to a doctor about these feelings, it will help you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 03:36 PM
3

Surely you can explain why they don't want to. What's different? Are you incapable of introspection?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 03:17 PM
2

So what's different? What it is that makes you or your friends not want to date them?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 03:48 AM
2

If a guy hit on you could you tell if he was straight or bisexual?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 02:58 AM
2

Why aren't they interested?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 02:28 AM
2

If you're just gonna ignore anything I say I don't see a reason to keep this dance going. Have fun fighting windmills.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 05:59 PM
3

No, they aren't. I'm pointing out YOUR fixation on one person in a sea of jerks.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 05:48 PM
2

I didn't claim that so why bother saying it?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 05:41 PM
10

Is the guy in that video any ruder than the women? All he did was do what they do. He was mean, but the game is mean by design. There's always women popping balloons over superficial things in those videos but you saw one man and do it and you've been crashing out for almost a year now. It's never been the gotcha you think it is. In the last month alone you've made posts using the exact same argument 3 times. I am being literal when I say there is nothing in this post that you haven't said in mu…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 03:53 PM
7

That's not even close to true, even if we only look at the western world. If you look at this link about Rome: "It was socially acceptable for a freeborn Roman man to want sex with both female and male partners, as long as he took an active role and the appropriate partner was a prostitute or slave.[13] Outside of marriage a man was supposed to act on his desires with only slaves, prostitutes (who were often slaves), and the infames. It was immoral to have sex with another freeborn man's wife, h…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 12:32 AM
9

What about these preferences are innate? Did biologically innate preferences coincidentally line up with the modern western world's beliefs about masculinity?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 11:44 PM
12

It's not biological or genetic. It's cultural. It is a learned feeling. It's learned from longstanding cultural beliefs about masculinity and sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 11:08 PM
20

What's the difference between a bisexual man in a relationship with a woman, and a heterosexual man in a relationship with a woman? There isn't much at all. You carefully avoided saying any reason why a woman would want to avoid dating a bisexual man. I suspect that is because the reasons almost always end up being homophobic. Studies like this one show that many women have negative views of bisexual men. "Results indicated that heterosexual women rated bisexual men as less sexually and romantic…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 08:18 PM
1

That article is a shockingly poor summary of the actual report. It's really worth noting that this publication should be viewed more like market research for UBS rather than a scientific study. Look at this quote “Our latest Own Your Worth research underscores the important role UBS, our financial advisors, and our industry as a whole, serves in supporting women breadwinners—and all women—on the path to greater financial participation,” said Jason Chandler, Head of Wealth Management Americas at …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 01:27 AM
–

Before the internet there were cookbooks. Your grandma didn't need a computer to find a recipe. If your grandparents are as old as mine, they cooked everything from scratch because that was the only option they had growing up in the Great Depression and WW2 rationing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 01:00 AM
1

Men are afraid of getting settled for too. The advice they receive is to stop being insecure. If they can't do that, they're told they need to improve themselves to reduce the possibility. It sounds like you want to be chosen for being better than the other women without actually making yourself better than them. You sound like a lot of insecure men right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 04:08 PM
–

You seem to have missed my main point. Personality traits, good or bad, don't get considered until you cross the attractiveness threshold. How many good ugly guys are there? By your words, none. Good means dateable, so if they were good they'd be attractive. We can only speak from our own anecdotal experiences. I can tell you that I know lots of less attractive guys with your good traits but they're single. However, you could tell me every less attractive guy you know has a less attractive perso…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 09:44 PM
–

You answered your own question. You have defined "good man" as good partner, not a good person in general. If you're generous, kind, financially stable, considerate, mongamous, and funny, but also ugly then you are not considered a good man by the definition you are using. We can't ignore looks and height like you said because women don't. That's a big source of the discontent. You filter for appearance and then goodness, but then claim goodness is the primary issue. Men do this too they just co…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 07:35 PM
3

Men still feel deep shame for not getting a partner. Why do you think they want sympathy? The reason incel communities thrive is because millions of people treat longterm singleness as an indictment of your entire character. This post is just another example of toxic masculinity, where men are shamed into silence when they feel the wrong emotions.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 03:56 PM
–

Your college classes had less ideological nutcases and most of the topics weren't touching their emotional sore spots. I imagine there was also fewer people just out to troll in those classes. The mods won't ban the most prolific nutjobs and ragebaiters because the sub would have no content without them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 11:45 PM
–

The best music is made by unhinged mentally ill people. Why are you hating?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 09:33 PM
1

If men treated women like they treated men I would expect the number of women getting murdered to dramatically increase. Almost 80% of homicide victims in the US are men. To get 50/50 there would need to be either a massive drop in men getting murdered, or a massive increase in women getting murdered.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 07:24 AM
12

Asking for high IQ, the ability to solve quadratic equations, and an understanding of recursion screams "i want a rich tech bro". That makes sense because she's the CEO of a sketchy crypto start up that's not gonna last long. She's not looking for a trophy husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 01:53 AM
12

"Just be bigger than 99% of people"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 01:24 AM
3

You described yourself intentionally deceiving someone. You weren't even ignorant in the situation. You knew you didn't know what the mushroom was, and you certainly knew it wasn't going to grant immortality. That's not an ignorant mistake. If you thought it was chicken of the woods but it was jack o lantern that would be ignorance.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 04:12 AM
1

The math solution is an assertion because it was written on a test. Without intent to decieve, it was false but not a lie. How do you get through life without learning what lying is? Ignorance is not deceit.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 02:03 AM
1

If a kid gets a math problem wrong on a test do you call the kid a liar? Lying is saying something untrue with intent to deceive.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 01:46 AM
10

Lying explicity requires intent. Being wrong and lying are not the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 10:12 PM
6

Did you read the comments in this thread? It comes up at least once a week.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 05:25 PM
5

No they aren't. 4B is a tiny minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 03:04 PM
-4

If she believes in gendered jobs she can have gendered jobs :)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 03:54 AM
4

You can find dozens of posts like this one all over reddit if you use the search function. People talk about it everywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 03:48 AM
-2

I tell every man that if your girl can't change a tire then you can't change a diaper :)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 03:21 AM
1

Akash worships his wife while she publicly fantasizes about other men. Akash chose to marry a woman that treats him like shit and we all watched it go down like the Hindenberg.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 10:09 AM
1

Well a strait is a geographical feature. I understand it, but it's a conscious decision that's not connected to sexual identity.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 11:31 PM
1

You don't know how dictionaries work, and you don't know how colons work. I am certified to teach english in the state of California if you need help.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 10:43 PM
1

Straight people are attracted to the opposite gender. Open a dictionary.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 10:16 PM
1

I know reading is kryptonite for you but I very clearly did not say that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 09:46 PM
1

There's no straight men dating men. Your comparison is absurd. The equivalent to a straight woman dating a bisexual man is a straight man dating a bisexual woman, not a straight man dating a bisexual man.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 09:30 PM
1

That statement is false. Studies consistently show it's not true. It's only women, men don't feel the same way. In every single comment you just use your statements as proof that your statememts are correct. At least thatbitchA gives some wishy washy answer about common values, you're not giving any explanation at all. "Why do straight people only want to date straight people? Because they only want to straight people. I am very smart 🤓" Just call me gay instead of dancing around it. You'll feel…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 06:46 PM
1

Because you're using circular reasoning to justify your lame responses. I feel like I'm in this scene right now. Many women don't like bi men because they get the ick from the idea of their man having been with another man. Men and women both have strict standards for body counts with respects to men, but looser standards with respects to women. You tried to argue that it's natural that straight people only want straight people to defelect the point but that's clearly not true, no matter how man…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 06:25 PM
1

"Maybe if I restate my unsubstantiated claim it will become true" They don't. You're just making shit up. You can find dozens of studies like this that show straight women do not want to date bi men but straight men have no problems with bi women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 05:24 PM
1

You literally did not. You've never explained why a straight person would only want to date a straight person. You state it like it's a fact and offer no reasoning or evidence. You actually weakened your argument because whatever common values straight people supposedly have are less valuable than the miniscule chance of a threesome. Why don't women see bisexual men as a chance for a threesome?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 05:11 PM
2

Most straight men don't care if the woman is bisexual or straight. It's not straight people wanting straight people, it's straight women wanting straight men. Why do women care when men don't?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 04:44 PM
1

Why do straight women want to date straight men? Most straight men will date bisexual women, so what's different?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 04:13 PM
7

You have a cake. You eat the cake. You no longer have a cake. Therefore, you cannot have the cake and eat it too. You must choose one.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 02:12 AM
5

You sound like a hockey player whining to the ref that the other guy cross checked him first so his retalation shouldn't matter. Two wrongs and all that Jazz
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 05:37 PM
2

I would appreciate that, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 05:25 PM
–

It's not. You're just a nut
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 05:24 PM
2

You didn't seem to notice my replies were just rephrasing arguments from here, lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 05:17 PM
–

Yesterday you were telling us men are bad because male fetuses take more energy in the womb. Yesterday you called all men Vermin. You have to be a mod's favorite user or something to not have been banned for hateful rhetoric at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 05:12 PM
6

Ugh, it's so gross that women expect a man to pay for them like he paid in previous relationships. You feel entitled to my money. I had fun paying for fancy dinners and buying expensive jewelery for women in the past but that doesn't mean I'm obligated to do it with you, and it's gross how you see me as nothing more than money.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 04:13 PM
2

Yes, unless it was a casual thing. It's about securing emotional commitment before I offer my resources. I'll pay for casual women, but I need more from serious women. Yes, I am protecting myself from women who want to take advantage of me. Sure I used to pay for Stacys but I've learned. I promise I don't think you're less attractive than the Stacys I paid for ;) Yes, it's not a sugar relationship so I don't need to give you money until I feel ready. Let me know if these arguments sound familar.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:59 PM
4

I only pay for girls I want something casual with. If I make you go 50/50 it means I actually want something serious. I paid when I was immature and insecure but now I know money can't get a relationship. Now I know better so it's not me treating you worse it's me protecting myself Here's the Lilith classic: If you'd like to have your date pay for you it's obvious you only care about money. If it's so important you should have made it clear you want a sugar relationship from the start.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:46 PM
–

How many men who aren't millionaires have millionaire wives and how many of those husband are complaining about hypergamy? You're scraping the bottom of the "men bad" barrel so hard you're talking about male fetuses like they're greedily hoarding resources. You need to spend less time on the internet. You also didn't link to any study, just sciencedaily's home page.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 10:50 PM
7

The lesson here is that men need to raise our standards and stop dating broke girls. If she's not paying for michelin star restaurants on the first date then she's not a real woman. Know your worth, kings! If I see a woman less than 5'8 I know she's not woman enough for a good man. I'm sorry short queens, but we need a woman with good genetics, and you're just not it. I'm just thinking about my kid's future, I don't want to have little gremlins. On a serious note, you're missing the reason peopl…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 04:14 PM
1

Do you think that logic applies to how long a woman takes to sleep with a man? I took the screenshot because men in this thread often make the comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 06:35 AM
–

You can go the gym and have a skincare routine. I can't change my height.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 02:49 AM
2

These analogies are so tortured you'd think they were at Abu Ghraib. I agree with OP's ideas but these analogies suck.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 02:26 AM
4

You're a 25 year old hanging out with trust fund kiddies and trying to act like everyone is like them. Rereading your post and I have a strong suspicion that you don't actually interact with the people you're describing. Your bad grammar, your vague descriptions, saying "cool instagram" and "young ballers" all lead me to believe you are younger than you claim to be, and that you only know of rich people through social media.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 01:35 AM
–

I get a kick out of reading liftandlurk alternate between telling people that toxic masculinity is bad and then saying the most toxic masculine garbage you can imagine. I've seen him do it in one comment. You gotta respect the game at that point.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 12:51 AM
5

Why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 08:20 PM
3

<image> A PPD commenter says that if you used to pay for first dates and you stop after getting used you are treating the ones who like you worse. The shoe is on the other foot now.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 04:44 PM
3

Man or woman, no one accepts uncomfortable truths. Many women are disgusted when men say they like youth and pathologize it as men being pedophiles. Many women hate that men have higher sex drives, and pathologize it that they are only interested in sex. You can find dozens of examples in this sub.You listed plenty of men examples so I don't need to detail them. The point is that women are not some self-actualizeds bodhisattvas that have ascended beyond human emotion. They are people, with all t…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 07:57 AM
3

A bear mauling won't give you psycho-sexual trauma but it has a higher chance of turning into "missing hiker never found"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 06:36 AM
4

The point was that if you knew how painful and scary a dog attack can be you wouldn't underestimate what a bear can do. Getting a chunk of your flesh ripped off by an animal's teeth is painful and traumatic. It took me years to get over my fear of dogs. Bears are bigger and can do a lot worse than a dog.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 06:10 AM
2

When people say things like this I can immediately tell they've never been attacked and bitten by a large dog. Hannibal Lector's face biting is tame compared to the animal kingdom.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 08:04 PM
23

I would mostly agree, however from my own experience most of the promiscous girls I knew in college are divorced. One is divorced twice with the same man. My own observations show that "sluts" don't struggle to find men but many struggle to find healthy relationships. I disagree that promiscous women are effervescent and fun to be around. Some certainly are, but not all of them. You can find plenty of promiscous women with BPD, and they are not pleasant to be around.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 03:33 PM
2

Then why mention open marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 08:52 PM
4

You are trying really hard to sound tough and edgy, but it's not working. You're safe behind a screen, just like me. The difference is that you're puffing you're chest out pretending you aren't a law abiding good boy typing on your phone. El Chapo is rotting in solitary confinement, and I am a free man. Once again, if your rules brought you to this, what good are your rules? You keep saying edgy shit like "your civilization". Buddy, you live here too. I know you're buying groceries and not ridin…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 06:55 AM
8

"Alphas are in super-maxes" I'm reminded of No Country For Old Men, when Anton Chigurh holds Woody Harrelson's character at gun point. While pointing a shotgun at Woody Harrelson's character Anton asks him "If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?" If your "alpha behavior" lands you in a small cell, what good is it? OP learned history at Hustler's University. The pathetic larper worship of "alpha males" reeks of Andrew Tate.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 03:33 AM
1

"Most of them are unteachable" Did you try to teach most men on Earth or are you drawing this conclusion from one or two people? Have you also considered that you're a bad teacher? People think it's easy to teach but it really isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 12:54 AM
5

"Every few years I got a one night stand, but I never got an official girlfriend or anybody long-term. Heck, I never even got a close, long-term, deep, meaningful, two-way friendship...I am hopelessly single." That's from your pinned post, dude. Your lived experience is a direct contradiction to what you've written.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 07:15 PM
0

You should consider the consequences when the good idea fairy pays you a visit. "I've got an idea. Let's take our violent criminals, mostly uneducated men from poorer economic backgrounds, and mutilate them in a way that will disqualify them from the best jobs available to them. Then just dump them back into society with one less hand. Surely they won't return to a life of crime when they have no good options." Your idea is not logically sound, and is mors likely to amplify the problem than fix …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 07:47 AM
2

"Snogged" is the most off putting slang for kissing I've ever seen. British people are fascinating and gross creatures.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 10:28 PM
2

Safety in numbers. Ape strong together.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 03:38 PM
2

He's calling you disingenous. "It just so happens" mocks the tendecies of certain people to make statements like "being X isn't important, it just so happens I married a guy that is very X" with X usually being something about height, hair, money, or general looks. If you had said you married an average looking guy it would sound truer.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 01:51 AM
–

People value the physical appearance achieved from working out, not the actual effort involved. The journey is important to the self, but only the results matter to other people. What results does your career have results that someone else could benefit from?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 04:06 PM
–

Yes, women get careers for themselves and that's why I'm asking why a man should value it. You said you want to be valued for your accomplishments and achievements. If you're not going to leverage those in a relationship, what value do they have to any potential partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 01:10 AM
–

American citizens are being denied due process by ICE.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 03:46 PM
1

You aren't most women and you don't represent most women. What you think is immaterial to what the majority of women believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 08:10 AM
1

People are inherently self interested and they care about stuff that brings value to them. Men with successful degrees use money and status to impress women, but in my experience successful women don't do the same. I'm not trying to be rude but I'm struggling to say it in a more polite way, what do your accomplishments and achievents bring to a man that they should value?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 11:41 PM
0

A man could also hand you a bag with one million dollars in cash and then leave you alone. In the realm of unlikely scenarios anything is possible. Default assuming someone is going to torture you is an unhealthy level of catastrophic thinking you should see a professional about. I've been working with a therapist about similar tendencies and it's helped.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 05:31 PM
1

I thought one of their other games Pathfinder: WotR had good hetero female romance options, but I'm a hetero guy so your experience might be different. Jae Heydari is best girl, I will die on this hill.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 06:42 PM
3

"Men are free individuals and they are not constantly acting as agents of feminism in their personal lives. Feminism can promote the idea that men should do more housechores, but it won't change the fact that men are more comfortable letting women do them, just like it can't force men to defy other gender roles in other ways, like wearing women's clothing, or doing most of the childcare. There is no injustice here. Women are free to boycott doing housework, and either men will be forced to start…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 10:34 PM
3

I didn't see any data about what kind of jobs those murders occurred. Are you just assuming tbat everyone women murdered in the workplace was a blue collar worker? That data doesn't support your claim. The source you linked very nicely disproves your claim. Women were 68% of non-fatal assault victims while the attackers were 43.5% patients and 22.8% students. 66% of all workplace assaults are happening in healthcare and in schools. An incredible risk of being assaulted doesn't seem to discourage…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 07:16 PM
2

It is in fact disproportionate representation that men are murdered 4x as much as woman in the workplace and they die 10x as much in the workplace. Meanwhile women who die in the workplace are 2.5x more likely to have been murdered. The numbers tell me that because so few women die in workplace accidents, a higher percentage of workplace fatalties are murders. What exactly do you think these numbers prove?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 06:00 PM
3

Sorry I forgot that 88 women murdered is a wider social issue but 366 men murdered is just another day at the office.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 04:20 PM
5

You just posted numbers that show men are killed in the workplace 4x as much as women and you're trying to use that to suggest women hace it worse. Those numbers also tell us men are 10x more likely to die on the job. That's not helping your narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 03:52 PM
10

Less than 1% of men are murderers. Statistics classes need to include more lessons about understanding whar stats mean over just math.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 03:00 AM
1

Why will women in these relationships never be satisfied? It seems like your argument is that old men are ugly therefore the relationship will be bad for the woman. However, in one of your comments you said age appropriate ugly men should get slack. Won't the women dating ugly men their own age be dissastisfied? And if so, shouldn't they be charging?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 03:37 PM
–

You didn't have to work to help the family keep it's home. You didn't have stay home to care for young siblings. You didn't grow up poor. You did take out your student loans knowing your parents were a safety net. You did go to college without worrying your family would suffer without your income. Stop acting like everyone had the opportunities you did.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 05:22 PM
–

It's not a conspiracy, it's simple economic factors. You, being born in a family of white-collar workers, had many oppurtunities that someone born in a poor blue-collar household did not.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 05:03 PM
–

How priveleged are you that no one you associate with works a blue collar job? How out of touch must you be to think everyone can work a white collar job?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 04:23 PM
2

I love the men's health article. Sources include an unscientific internet survey and a limo driver. This is the standard of evidence I live for.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 10:59 PM
1

"City of brotherly love" is the most ironic name in America. Your comments make a lot more sense when contextualized with the information that you're a jerk and proud of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 02:43 PM
–

You could click the link and read the studies...It's comparing standarized national tests to classroom tests and grades. The graders for the standardized tests only see the student ID number. When you get shown an example of an institutional bias against boys your first reaction is to try and minimize the problem. The idea that men might have problems that aren't self-inflicted and problems that are not easily remedied is something you don't seem willing to accept. Does your "caring about men's …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 04:26 AM
–

You can teach boys to shut up and they'll still score higher on tests where the graders don't know their gender. This covers a lot of the issues and while some are caused by behavioral differences it is clear that institutional bias plays a significant role. You pay lip service to men's issues as a general idea, but when you see actual examples that faux empathy fades and you dismiss it all as personal failings. Men struggling with loneliness? They're fault, it's on them to fix it. Boys struggli…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 02:24 AM
3

84% of statistics are made up on the spot.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 02:36 PM
-1

Are you people so shallow that you see relationships as nothing but sex? Does it ever cross your mind that maybe people want to love and be loved? Or that maybe people want the deeper connection of having a partner? What do you get from these cynical assumptions of their motivation?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 07:13 AM
2

So now laziness is a deciding factor too. You're moving the goal posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 09:38 PM
5

Your argument is dead, you admitted shitty people can have friends and not be lonely. Clearly decency is not the deciding factor.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 09:28 PM
3

There's no shortage of shitty people with friends. There's also lonely pepple with friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 09:24 PM
3

You can alter that statement to be about anything if you're not gonna support it with evidence or reasoning. "If they were decent people they wouldn't have trouble finding a job" or "if they were a decent person they wouldn't have trouble being cancer free" What is the connection between decency and socializing? If you don't explain that your statement just seems to be a post hoc justification.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 09:15 PM
2

It's the only thing you discuss. It's the entirety of your post. At no point in your post do you define what feminism is or what it says that is being proven. Reading your post doesn't really offer much evidence of patriarchy, toxic masculinity, pay gaps, invinsible labor, or any other feminist issue. Does your post prove these issues? A good faith argument would not ignore my main point but here we are ¯_(ツ)_/¯
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:24 PM
3

Is the entirety of feminism that women face backlash for coming forward? No, it's not. So what aspect of feminism is being proven? Why can't we draw societal implications from an internet slap fight? It is because it doesn't represent the general population. You could make it a case study if you wanted, an example of how some cases can play out but not an indictment of millions of people. In general, people are more vicious and less empathetic online than they are in person and that counts here …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:07 PM
4

What exactly is proven by this incident? It's hard to respond because you don't really have a primary claim. Feminism is a broad topic and I don't think a single incident is enough to prove every aspect of it. I guess my main counterpoint is that this is a relatively unknown incident and really can't be expanded to societal implications. I hadn't seen anything about it before this post and when I searched for it the only sites reporting were local news and gossip sites. This seems to be a slap f…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 07:47 PM
–

It's well known that black men are never forced to deal with social justice issues in the US./s Your flare would be more true to your views if it said "no war but gender war"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 09:10 PM
2

American politics are stupid, and realistically about 80% of the voters would vote for a chimpanzee if it was the nomination of their preferred party. Trump's individual policy positions and his actions have almost no bearing on most of the people who voted for him. It's only about 15% of voters in the swing states who really keep American presidential elections fluid. All that is to say, farmers would have voted for any republican, not just DJT, and they will continue to do so even after going …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 04:11 PM
2

Do you know the difference between gay and bi? A gay person in a straight relationship doesn't feel attraction. It's not the same, it's a poor comparison. Why wouldn't a man date a bi man? Because he is not attracted to men. Presumably the woman is attracted to men. This is a terrible comparison. The male equivalent of a straight woman dating a bi man is a straight man dating a bi woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 03:05 PM
6

What's the difference between a bi man and straight man if they're both in a hetero relationship? I mean, what is there to prefer in the straight man? I think it's weird you are running defence for homophobic women. Seriously, go read what women actually write about bi man instead of trying to invent a rational reason. They consistently say that they believe homosexual relations are gross and/or unmanly (they get the ick), they believe most bi men are just closested gay men, and they get insecur…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 02:49 PM
10

I love when you complain about analogies and metaphors. It's like living proof of the difference between literacy, being able to understand written words, and functional literacy, being able to understand the meaning and intent of several words put together.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 10:11 PM
1

There is no source for the outcome of the case. The only sites reporting on it are sketchy gossip websites. This story is mostly fake. To answer your question immaterial to the clickbait posted, there is nothing wrong in concealing wealth or protecting your assets from someone you're dating. The gossip story you shared shows that people SHOULD actively protect their assets. They dated for a year and she was a woman with significant assets of her own but she sued him for half his worth.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 07:57 PM
–

AI is just stuck with the piss filter right now isn't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 02:07 PM
2

She probably doesn't know much about Amazons. If she did she would not call them "Amazonians".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 10:20 PM
1

Lol. Lmao even. You're wrong and you're just going for personal attacks. This sub has been taken over by trolls
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 06:59 PM
2

No they don't. A majority of criminals are men but those criminals are a miniscule percentage of all men. Thia sub seems to be filled with people who failed or never took a statistics class.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 06:55 PM
14

There seems to be a lot of people in this sub who don't seem to believe that men can experience romantic feelings beyond sexual desire. Unless he's asking for a hookup there's a good chance there's more than wanting sex. If you develop romantic feelings for someone and they don't return them it hurts to be around them. Your strawman is wide of the mark. People need space to move past their feelings, and often they need space because they're embarassed. It takes a rare maturity to move past feeli…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 09:21 PM
–

Yaoi girls are an overrepresented minority on the internet. Your theory is based on a false assumption that most women like homoerotic art and literature. The smut popular with women is all about 6'8 half demon billionaires with 8 packs falling in love with some plain jane girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 06:10 PM
3

I wouldn't try to jump a guy with a gun. I most certainly would not bring a skateboard to a gun fight. "Crossed state lines" He drove like 15 minutes and it was to a state with looser gun laws.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 11:22 PM
3

You have been using the same clip from a semi-scripted dating show for months. Yes, the shows are scripted. People play up a character or a role to create drama. It's fake. It's literally ragebait.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 11:06 PM
3

I'm pro-choice and this is a pointless line of reasoning. Anyone who is currently using the bible to justify their pro-life stance will not be swayed even a little by your arguments. Anyone who uses biblical verses to justify their morality is likely immersed in the faith. There's a good chance they know the bible better than you and will not be impressed by your smattering of googled bible verses. There's a better chance they will do what their minister/priest tells them is right, which is unli…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 02:12 PM
12

Several Studies show that boys receive lower grades on teacher graded tests than they do on anonymous state/national tests. When graders know the gender of the student, boys score lower. While there are many causes, bias against boys in school is a factor. I can tell you as a teacher I know teachers that say things like "I hate all men" but don't consider themselves biased. Hell, when I first read this study I had to change what I was doing because I realized I was grading boys harder. The effec…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 11:22 PM
1

If you experience a stress response that doesn't result in you fighting, fleeing, or freezing it really wasn't a fight or flight response. All stress releases hormones like cortisol but not all stress responses are the same. The studies like "Sex differences in the effects of acute stress on behavior in the ultimatum game" are studying accute stress not chronic stress. Most importantly, none of the studies you cited actually measured violent responses. Taylor measures different horomone releases…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 06:27 AM
2

Did you actually read the studies? They don't support your ideas in any way. This research only applies to situations which stimulate a flight or fight response. Chronic stress and things like that do not create this response. Fight or flight is a physiological response to a perceived imminent harmful threat. You are falsely implying that fight or flight responses might lead to violence against women. Unless the woman is acting in a way that makes the man feel there is an imminent threat of bodi…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 05:38 AM
2

You're from an English speaking country and you post a lot about American decade nostalgia. So you're either Canadian or larping. Either way, the country you live in does not have blue collar workers dying at 40.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 11:15 PM
7

Years of trying to be better just lead to the miserable idea that I wasn't good enough. I ditched that mindset and it made me a happier person.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 10:32 PM
21

By definition, only 10% of men can be in the top 10%. Almost every day someone makes a thread that you're not rich enough, or handsome enough, or charismatic enough, or some other long list of requirements. It's not original, and it's not helpful. The endless requirements of the self-improvement types will only make you miserable I'm sick of gymrats who get a sixpack and talk like they've reached nirvana.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 10:01 PM
5

Why does her beauty routine matter? Does she think men wake up with with a combed head of hair, a clean shaven face, and a sharp suit? Gym memberships, well-fitting clothes, nice colognes, and good haircuts cost money. Unless she's dating fat slobs in sweat pants than she's got nothing to stand on. It takes a high level of self-importance and narcissism to think only your own efforts to look good matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 06:20 AM
3

Do you think unlikable people don't feel lonely? Frankly your ideas are bafflingly stupid and cruel to boot. Yes, a lot of lonely people contribute to their own loneliness, but that doesn't mean they don't feel lonely. Why are you trying to insist their feelings are false? Feelings are emotions and emotions are irrational. If I do something stupid and break my leg, my leg hurts regardless of the fact that I caused the pain. What are you even gatekeeping and how do you intend to do it? If I wanna…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 09:02 PM
2

It's difficult to express how wrong you are without being insulting. According to Forbes and other sources women control or influence 85% of consumer spending. Women do most of the everyday household shopping. Women do most of the Christmas shopping. Women are the ones who buy stuff, whether single or in a relationship. If people behind the scenes were manipulating society to extract wealth from men, they would be doing everything in their power to get men married and having kids. A single man w…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:09 PM
2

"Conversion therapy" is hate. Trying to foricibly change someone says you hate what they are. It's not controversial or reductionist. That's why it's not real therapy. That's why there's no science behind it. That's why there's no licensed therapists involved. That's why it doesn't work. That's why you're throwing out a red herring about DV (Lesbian DV rates are lifetime rates, and 1/3 of the women said it was a man who abused them at some point in their life. You can look studies up and find ou…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 10:13 PM
11

"It didn't happen but they deserved it" From one side of your mouth you say it's an outlier and should not be counted. From the other side of your mouth you say it's actually a good thing. You shoul pick one. Conversion camps are religious, not based in psychology. They are not employing licensed therapists and psychologists because the DSM-V does not recognize homosexuality as a disorder. Where did you get intolerance in the LGBTQ community from what you said? Intolerant to who? The people who …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 06:47 PM
12

There are conversion camps for gay kids. There aren't any for straight kids. Any hate the LGBTQ community throws out is drowned by the torrent they receive. That's not even true. I challenge you to find any bible verse that says disbelief is equivalent to Satanism. Being a non-believer means you won't be saved, it does not make you in league with Satan. Atheism being associated with Satanism is a product of the Satanic Panic, not theology. Not having kids is not the same as anti-natalism. You're…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 04:12 PM
3

Women marched on Versailles, they did not storm it. The Bastille was stormed by a crowd of mostly men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 12:15 AM
–

History made it clear that women are property. You were your father's property until he sold you to your husband. Somehow I don't think you want that. Ditch the historical justifications unless you want a true patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 07:12 AM
2

In my experience the only people obsessed with a woman who hasn't shown interest in them are creepy nutjobs and socially awkward orbiters. Being obsessed with a woman who isn't showing interest sounds like what a desperate loner would do. I can't imagine how insufferable you must be to classify things like basic human interaction as emotional labor.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 09:51 PM
2

Everything but items 3 and 5 can, and often do, apply to men. Most of those points are can be described as losing the fantasy of marriage. Marriage does that a lot better than divorce. Women often mentally check out of a relationship before it's officially over. They stop fighting and arguing because they've already moved on. Some men see the decrease in anger and think it's a sign of improvement and then get blindsided by a divorce they should have expected. A lot of women get divorced because …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 03:46 PM
1

It would be difficult to get "dozens upon dozens" of rejections with cold approaches but you're hostile to those. In order to get those kinds of numbers with warm approaches, you'd have to approach almost every guy in your social circle and get rejected. Is it possible your definition of approach and rejection are much broader than most people's? If not, are you a hypocrite who despises cold approaches but did them, or are you so unappealing that no one in your social circle wanted you? I think …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 02:02 AM
0

You say what's happening today, lifelong monogamy, isn't natural. What are you basing that on? Are you basing it on history? On prehistoric civilization? Is your entire idea based on the mating practices of great apes and elephants? Once again for easy reading, how do you know what is "natural" for human mating behavior?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 10:05 PM
1

People appeal to a mythical "natural human" based on what pre-historic humans might have lived like before agriculture. It's an appeal to nature fallacy without knowing what natural is. What is natural for humans? Humans 15,000 years ago and 100,000 ago are both before agriculture but they lived very different lives. Is one of them more natural? For all of written human history monagamous pairings have been dominant in almost every major society. Why isn't that natural?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 09:21 PM
32

Male loneliness today looks like apathy and detachment. The lonely men aren't joining the military. They're playing videogames, working low effort jobs, eating fast food, and watching porn. It's a miserable but comfortable experience. The comforts and apathy of modern life have left developed countries hurting for military recruits. From the US to China, militaries report that they're not getting enough volunteers and they're rejecting a much higher number of recruits for being too fat and unhea…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 09:25 PM
-1

Don't you think it's chauvinist and misogynist to define things like "discipline" as masculine? Is it womanlike or feminine to be lazy, emotional, non-competitive, and timid? If a woman is competitive and assertive doesn't that makes her masculine? Fellas is it gay to date a successful woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 12:31 AM
2

I teach high school seniors. I don't think your ideas of masculinity and school are correct at all, especially in the idea that masculinity is less intelligent than it was. Nerds got made of a lot more in the past. In my classroom I've also seen no correlation between how masculine a boy is and how successful they are. Some of my worst behaved students are macho jackasses that have As. The biggest correlation I've seen for failing students is apathy. The majority of my apathetic students are boy…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 12:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter