breatheDrinkEatSleep Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	At what age does your window of opportunity to get attractive girls in the 18-22 year old age range close if you're a man in the United States? Ah. Thanks! Still could be taken a number of ways. 1) You are an ardent women's rights advocate (and God bless you for it) 2) You are a guy or gal who is a little henpecked, and poking fun at yourself a bit 3) You are sort of stating the irony of the Zeitgeist as Hillary prepares to take a year early victory lap. edit: diction	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/12/15 08:39 AM
1	At what age does your window of opportunity to get attractive girls in the 18-22 year old age range close if you're a man in the United States? So, off topic, but are you a Petticoat Junction fan, or are you Ruled by petticoats in some obscure way?	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/12/15 06:12 AM
1	At what age does your window of opportunity to get attractive girls in the 18-22 year old age range close if you're a man in the United States? I see. I imagine it's a product of the accumulation of poor hygienic behavior and the increasing likelihood for mutation. Too bad really. Be nice if we could get the plasma not so infiltrated with heavy metals and strongly bonded carbon, etc. Onward amd upward I suppose, no?	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/12/15 04:22 AM
1	At what age does your window of opportunity to get attractive girls in the 18-22 year old age range close if you're a man in the United States? You're taking a quote from one scientist citing an example of the differences between a 40 year old and a 20 year old father from one study and extrapolating that 25 is the best cut off age for good genes for the entire species. That's a broad brush, even for Reddit. You can't see the flaw in your logic there? There are idiosyncratic factors that each father enjoys that will radically change their genetic propensity for healthy children. Do you actually practice science, or are you just pulling …	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/12/15 03:26 PM
3	At what age does your window of opportunity to get attractive girls in the 18-22 year old age range close if you're a man in the United States? Someone's been getting his dick wet in enough stupid bitches to make him think stupidity is desirable! Yeah, no, you lose. The finest bitches are always hot and smart, but you already know this and are in denial in the worst way, mon frere. Quelle dommage...	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/12/15 09:03 AM
2	At what age does your window of opportunity to get attractive girls in the 18-22 year old age range close if you're a man in the United States? 35, not 25. Can you imagine if 25 was the cutoff for good genes? Half the people I know have folks who were over 25 when they had them, and none of them are autistic. 25....lmao, yeah, no.	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/12/15 08:59 AM
1	Being a smart, morally upstanding, hardworking guy who plays by the rules has nothing to do with whether you are able to attract women. In fact, being a 'bad guy' who is violent/into crime probably means you're getting laid more than the guy who does everything 'right'. They didn't use the word shy, you did. They implied that because of the hard work involved with doing well in school, especially a school like MIT, they don't have the time and effort (that ostensibly someone less inclined to study would have) to woo whomever they might be dtf.	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/12/15 08:21 AM
1	CMV: Because one egg is more valuable than 10,000 sperm, a society where women receive advantages will inevitably reach a point that the value of men as a whole depreciates You say that men are necessary to ensure the offspring's safety until maturity, but then confuse that thought by saying that men are technically disposable after the child is born. Can we please admit that whatever value a woman offers by breastfeeding is equivalent to the value that the man offers via protecting the family unit. You are also blatantly ignoring the fact that a solid parental team is the best predictor of a stable child, and so is therefore highly desirable, and all modern conven…	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/12/15 01:54 AM
1	CMV: Because one egg is more valuable than 10,000 sperm, a society where women receive advantages will inevitably reach a point that the value of men as a whole depreciates Ok, I read like 20% of that, but stopped when I reached what I consider to be a logical contradiction. If women are to be 'valued' more because they give life, what about a man's role in the life giving process? Yes, without a woman there would be no child, but without a man there would be no child either.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/12/15 02:58 PM
1	Q4RP: What do you think would happen if women initiated more? Both men and women give up a certain amount of power when they initiate. One becomes the pursuer, the other the prusuee. Gender does not determine who must or mustn't give up that power, nor who should pursue or be pursued. I think that it is a really huge oversight on what it means to be a sexual being of either gender to presume one gender must follow their sexual instincts in some predetermined order. Talk about drawing a conclusion well before the moment even exists!	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/12/15 07:17 AM
3	Q4RP: What do you think would happen if women initiated more? Yes, thank you. I love how autistic is now a catch word for any and all deviation from the mean social conduct. A little weird? Autistic.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/12/15 07:13 AM
3	Post a picture of someone over 40 who you think is attractive. Dara Torres Baddest bitch I've ever seen over 40. So, so hot. edit: Jenny Lopez is 46. Also a crazy cute chick. edit2: a million years after the fact, but Monica Belluci is unbelievably attractive too, and I think she's over fifty. That scene from the Matrix...forget about it. Fine as May wine.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/12/15 05:45 AM
3	Red Pill often says women need men more than men need women. Where does this idea come from? Not who you responded to, but my thinking is that the logic comes from teh idea that men often times are tasked with the lion's share of the financial responsibility in the household (at least in my area that's how it is), and women are often providing more of a sexual role. So, the author of that logic might think it was easier for a guy to masturbate or find a prostitute than it would be for a gal to find a job that would compensate for her lack of funds without a man.	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/11/15 07:43 AM
1	Arent only "beta" guys attracted to the Red Pill in the first place? I mean, I get the semantic intent. What I don't get....well...what I think the sticking point in the argument is that people vacillate from person to person to some extent. I think it also skews young, so it seems like a personality trait, but it's more a side effect of lack of exposure to the wide world out there.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/11/15 01:13 PM
1	Arent only "beta" guys attracted to the Red Pill in the first place? You make it sound like there are distinct states in which everyone exists. Psychological models of human behaviour show that does not hold. Sometimes people are more A, sometimes more B. Characterising human behaviour in a binary sense displays ignorance of the human condition, if you wanna be real about it. There may be boundary conditions, but they are not tenable as a unique psychic phenomenon. Fringe elements always exist but gravitation toward the mean is the norm, pretty much as a rule.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/11/15 11:37 AM