TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

brgenspuzmauker Archive

View 1 post and 40 comments by brgenspuzmauker on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

brgenspuzmauker/r/MensRights29/08/14 04:24 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Pretty good video, I laughed
/r/MensRights05/06/15 10:31 AM
2

Gotta love that historical revisionism and selective portrayal of life.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 12:00 PM
2

Oh shit, I didn't even see that part, You're completely correct.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 10:52 AM
8

to be fair, they're asking a question, and then posing a suggestion, the two are not mutually inclusive and they're asking a question as to whether they need to implement women's only rooms, and then a separate question as to whether they should get couch sharing going, no gendered pronouns, only imagination to fill in the gap.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 02:24 PM
1

Thanks, I stand mostly corrected, I will note that this man got a listing on the sex offender's registry, while I am unable to pull information regarding the woman in the case, though the main issue that I have is that I do not believe that that is anywhere near enough time, regardless of whether there is or isn't a disparity. Absolutely sickening.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 09:02 PM
3

Was more outraged about the following Some have attacked the victim and one threatened to assault him and the bit from the CBC article During the trial, her lawyer called the former student a liar and a manipulator... Furthermore, I doubt that a 32 Year old Man would only get 20 Months jail and 2 years probation for sexually assaulting a 15 year old girl for a couple of years. Though, I would like to know if I'm wrong, that would be something nice to see that there's not much (if at all) sentenc…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 07:56 PM
1

Does anyone else get Orwellian vibes out of this?
/r/MensRights05/08/14 10:46 AM
2

Yup, it is rather unseemly. I don't think we should be blaming this on anything or anyone (nor do I think we are) outside of Rodger himself. It is all ridiculous and I believe that one of the big focuses for advocacy at the moment should be mental illness, and the lack of treatment and empathy thereof, as he was definitely a sick man and would have done better had he accepted treatment.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 10:23 AM
1

And i'm not saying (or… trying not to) say anything to the contrary. Men were also some of his intended targets, but other people are latching onto his misogyny and making it into the gendered issue that it shouldn't be. indeed, we do need to do something.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 10:11 AM
1

Yes indeed they may have been, but from the other viewpoint, the guy was clearly a misogynist, among many other things (cocktail of problems?), and that is what they're latching onto. They are drawing to the conclusion that because he hated women (which he did) he killed 2 sorority girls, which may or may not be true. I haven't read his "manifesto", nor do I intend to, so if that was his intention then they're right. Whether he succeeded in his goal of killing lots of women or not doesn't change…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 12:19 AM
8

Beware Ye who wander here, for you may never return past the great beyond known as Tv Tropes.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 09:50 PM
1

Isn't this the same list as that red-headed nut job was yelling at someone in that protest in toronto a couple days ago?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 11:29 PM
2

Nah, I'm merely echoing what the nut jobs like femitheist and dworkin (I think) are saying, I may have also forgotten a /s
/r/MensRights09/04/13 10:17 PM
4

No, you're right, they'd rather have it removed completely.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 08:23 PM
2

I think it's presenting a single example of differing spacial use, and leading the reader to draw the conclusion that men have larger carbon footprints than women through that cursory example.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 01:20 AM
5

How is it reading a lot into a single sentence…? it says "ballfields, which are more likely to be used by boys, take up more space in a community…". This part of the sentence sets up the narrative that boys use up a lot of space (regardless of it being green space) and when used with the rest of the sentence "than ballet studios, which are more likely to be used by girls" puts in the comparison and finishes the narrative by implying that girls have less of a spacial footprint on a community. The…
/r/MensRights09/01/13 10:45 PM
8

I don't think it's the Idea that different genders use space differently being a controversial idea to him. I think it was just the author picking their battles so selectively that the sole reason that the text is there is to draw up the image that boys take up more space than girls, when the premise can be easily reversed to show boys playing videogames and taking very little room and girls doing soccer and taking up a field.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 10:15 PM
4

it's been discussed many a times before, the general consensus is yes.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 05:56 PM
36

The only way is if the mods slip up in allowing "Illegal" or "Ban-worthy" content to stay for longer than a period of say… a day or so, (I wouldn't know what the timeframe for removal would be). As such, I doubt there is much to fear on the end of the method that was previously used if the mods stay vigilant, however, they could easily be changing tactics and preparing for some kind of special tactics. Edit: Wow, downvotes for a reasonable answer to the question posted?
/r/MensRights15/10/12 10:43 PM
2

I see it now… I really should have read more, I only skimmed the beginning of the article and saw date rape and questioned it's relevance. Thanks for the clarification.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 10:20 AM
3

Might want to submit as a separate article instead of as a post in a comment, cause I don't see how this is relevant.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 02:27 AM
1

Out of context, this sentence has nothing to assert your claim that she thinks the father is only an ATM machine. It shows that she, as the sole custodial parent (don't know if that's the case) had to make a choice that she believed was the right thing to do. Now, I believe she should have informed and/or consulted the father if he was involved in his child's life, but I'm sure the father would have wanted justice sought out.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 11:45 AM
8

Yup… two of the mods are in that video around 4:00 Minutes, Dworkin and someone else.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 12:47 AM
13

Under the hypothetical premise that feminism is a synonym for gender egalitarianism, then somewhat yes. That is currently not the case, and I do not have the ability to adequately summarize as to the reasoning as to why that is. I would still however prefer to call myself a gender egalitarian as just the word feminism is almost promoting women's issues over that of the other half of the population. As to your negative experiences, remember that there are always people in social movements that ar…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:10 PM
1

I think we should do away with the gendered bias in the auto insurance and base it solely on the individual driver, by using one of those telemetric devices to assess the driver's ability. Basing your insurance premiums on a generalization for individual skill is a bad idea.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 08:56 PM
32

This is just absolutely insane. I don't see how this can be legal.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:22 PM
2

They just did it for the fun of it, it was senior years and everyone was more mature.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 04:41 PM
0

PE was separated in my high school. There was however, a choice to do co-ed gym in the last years, but not the first two.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 01:46 PM
7

It's not up to us to determine the details. She wanted advice, he gave advice, good advice and you ad-hominem'd him. Going to the police is always the best advice, to which she should give a full truthful statement about the whole night and her feelings regarding it.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:27 PM
7

Now, I'm not sure what the exact specifics of creepshots was, but from my memory, the whole issue stems from an abuse of position (the photographer was a teacher) and the age of the subjects of the photos (the people in the photos weren't of a legal age for sexual consent). This, while kinda creepy, isn't being taken by a singular person (so may still be an abusive situation) and isn't of under age guys. I'm sure there's examples that point out this happening to men, but the specific example is,…
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:58 AM
6

They rationalize it because they believe that people in "power" cannot be hated upon because their definition of sexism is as i stated above. As they're so wrapped up in their definition of sexism, they don't see the hatred against men as something valid because it lacks a piece of their "sexism" equation. They then take this, add in the victim complex and expand it outward and believe that white males cannot be victims of systemic hatred for just being male or otherwise, and then just do the wh…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 08:37 PM
1

Not sure… though where would be a better place, this isn't peer-reviewed and wouldn't qualify for /r/science. Just thought i would post it because it brings a health benefit to having male children and would be useful against those nutjobs that want eugenics to keep the male population at 10%? Still, if you (or someone else) could point me in a better direction, i'll be happy to post it there as well.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 08:01 PM
13

Because they're too wrapped up in owning the victim complex that they can't think of a world where they aren't victims? I guess it also comes from their thought that sexism = prejudice + power?
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:26 PM
9

♩ ♪ ♫ ♬ Always look on the bright side of life! ♩ ♪ ♫ ♬ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHPOzQzk9Qo
/r/MensRights25/09/12 08:26 PM
37

Clear as a summer day now. Thanks!
/r/MensRights25/09/12 06:00 PM
63

Help me understand the comment… i can't quite grasp what the picture would be for being casually teased at work.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 05:09 PM
2

yup
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:15 PM
5

check the sidebar and the place that rightsbot copies to. I haven't been around long, and that's the best advice that I have to offer, maybe if it would help, you could get it in legal binded writing? lawyer?
/r/MensRights24/09/12 10:40 PM
2

This makes the most sense.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 12:20 PM
3

Easily the best response. Though, for the other ones (1 - 6) look with a lawyer or with current existing laws, in your county, jurisdiction, province, or whatever.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 09:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter