TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

brickstick Archive

View 0 posts and 24 comments by brickstick on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'll address the rest of your comments later - but take a moment and see how you've willfully ignored what I've written to paint me as a slave who is fine with being a slave when I have spoken for fairness and responsibility of both parties. You are just othering me so that you can ignore what I have to say- because your big rant that I think 'nothing needs to change' is you crowing to yourself and not representative of me in the slightest. You want to be the big victim here? Go ahead- keep your…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:15 AM
12

This is getting to a stupid strawman point now. That there is unfairness in how things are structured now that favours the mother is true. Nobody should be able to force anyone to have a child- that's unconscionably stupid. And nobody thinks a man is a rapist for begging for a child's life FFS. ​ There is an important conversation to have here that we all miss out on when we stretch arguments this extreme.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:05 AM
1

I agree with the principle that having a child should be something that is consented to by both parties. But if I'm going to be honest with you - this is a juvenile solution that asks for women to should all of the potential risk in sex (as they need to obtain this contractual agreement to protect themselves) and removes responsibility from men alltogether. I don't have to consent to the rule of law to be held accountable for crimes, I'm obligated by a necessary societal framework to be responsi…
/r/MensRights15/06/19 06:44 PM
1

That sounds as simple as getting people to consent to being in a relationship before kissing. But maybe it's better than how things are right now, if you can guarantee women safe access to abortions. Seems unduly burocratic Imo. You'd think that reliable birth control would be an easier route for unwanted pregnancy, maybe I'm off base but I think that if you come in someone intentionally you've implied intent to procreate. I don't know, I don't think there is a simple answer.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 05:22 AM
1

This is extremely interesting because from a biological standpoint this is also lopsided- there is no option for a man to carry a child. ​ For a situation where birth control is used (implying no consent to reproduce) and conception occurs it would make sense that if she decides she wants to keep it, she can and if she decides not to keep it she can do that too - that is her bodily autonomy. If she decides to keep it it would make sense that 'he' have to 'opt in' to parental responsibility. ​ Th…
/r/MensRights14/06/19 08:05 PM
-11

Couldn't he not cum in her? After that point yes - no say whatsoever but full stop makes it sound like there was never any say and there certainly was.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 06:08 PM
-2

https://me.me/i/our-blessed-homeland-their-barbarous-wastes-our-glorious-leader-their-16003540
/r/MensRights20/09/18 02:21 PM
5

That's a forum posts that shows two graphs specifically stating that the represent conflicting data....
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:28 PM
7

If Macdonald's were bad for you, starving someone would be beneficial. We need more masculinity and fewer poor justifications. Kids without moms get depressed too, so we need more femininity? Give me a break
/r/MensRights27/06/18 09:22 PM
1

If you looked you'd find more than enough evidence, I think we both know on some level that you're being willfully ignorant because it's easier on you. You're not wrong about there being a real problem with separated families within the states and with men being mistreated in that circumstance; you're still turning a blind eye on a tragedy to point at your preferred bogeyman. There is so much anger in your post, I wish I knew what I could do to help with that but I don't. I'll tell you this, I'm…
/r/MensRights23/06/18 07:48 PM
1

It has good points, and it has a good reason to exist, people just don't care to take the time to think outside of what they'd prefer to be true.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 04:47 PM
2

It must be easy to make things go away by not believing in them. The tragedy still persists, they did put a man on the moon and there are children in cages. People denied the holocaust but that didn't make it disappear, it just removed the burden from them, made the enemy someone else, some easier to be angry at.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 04:45 PM
0

I mean I either try and point out when things are wrong and get slammed for not auto up voting or I say nothing and let the terrorists win.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 03:20 AM
-19

The problem isn't that this is anecdotal, it's flat out wrong. Even if someone shittily rips away custody it's no comparison to children being forcibly separated from both their parents and help in cages. This isn't even showing off hippocrisy the person is just shitty for the first thing.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 01:28 AM
1

That doesn't work, then everyone is just yelling angrily. It'd probably be loud and unpleasant.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 03:24 AM
73

Need better articles than this. This is just angry, opinionated yelling.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 09:53 PM
1

Wouldn't this be great though? Like I don't want to work more and if the structures were in place for me to work less I 100 percent would .
/r/MensRights13/05/18 03:32 PM
2

I don't remember the last time a man was called a skank. I hear and agree that anyone should be protected from false rape accusations - and I think that how you start is not by saying that people who have been raped don't deserve justice. Nobody has argued or mentioned that anyone should be punished, convicted, etc without due process or evidence.That would be wrong. You're creating an us/them here - it's just us. It's all us.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 05:27 PM
3

Well it's both, the context of the statement I commented on was about justice, and the flowchart was about was it rape - I made that clear. You sound angry - do you have a problem with your viewpoint being challenged?
/r/MensRights17/04/18 04:50 PM
-7

Yeah fuck those kids that got raped, the losers. Why do you even care? Enforcing that far after the fact is certainly challenging, but saying that some kids who were raped by priests or family members or parents are skanks that don't deserve justice is just garbage. Now if you're talking exclusively about adults, specifically about the no consent/can't consent subset- this chart is still about 'was it rape' and not can it be proven. Saying someone no longer deserves justice, or calling them a sk…
/r/MensRights17/04/18 01:02 PM
1

ITT: A bunch of people hating on a dad that wants to do right by his kid. I mean I hate unthinking losers too! Look at this dumb guy, he's totally overdone it and is approaching this perceived issue all wrong. I bet he tries too hard to be accommodating of black people too and they don't like it because he's socially unbearable.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 12:31 AM
1

Agreed, person in article is dumb and is putting her child at risk. The gender of the child is kind of arbitrary here.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 12:35 PM
-7

This is horseshit, thanks for the anecdote you've associated with something else.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 09:41 PM
3

Now I might get shit on for saying this, but I think there is a large difference between a phallic or yonic sex toy and a faux human sex toy.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 11:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter