TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bridgecrewdave Archive

View 6 posts and 239 comments by bridgecrewdave on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Baldurs mom, not the Boys.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 11:42 PM
35

This is the weirdest Gatekeeping I've seen today.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 11:22 PM
-6

I think you're all forgetting one key point. The girl she did it too couldn't be happier.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 09:29 PM
1

I like a nice non cut off jort. Cut offs are the worst.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 03:11 AM
2

Article says don't wear cargo shorts. Recommends cut off jorts instead. Fuck off article.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 02:00 AM
8

I mean..he was also a criminal. So maybe she said that because she had full custody with no visitation, because of the felony, and she knew that if Scott did those things then that would show he's actually turning his life around and could be a good role model for Cassie.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 03:12 PM
8

Saida Grundy, Born on a Monday, Christened on a Tuesday, Graduated on a Wednesday, Tweeted on a Thursday, News on a Friday, Defended on Saturday, Fired on Sunday, And that was the end of Saida Grundy
/r/MensRights09/05/15 01:27 PM
2

Godwin's law strikes again. And quicker than usual!
/r/MensRights24/04/15 04:12 AM
5

You're right. Men should just be barred from post secondary education.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 08:58 PM
1

Oh I'm not even saying I agree with him but I can see the logic. You can understand where someone is coming from and still not agree.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 06:23 PM
7

Milo has been open about his feelings on trans* people since day 1 and whilst I don't agree with him I do see his point. He sees transexualism in the same category as other body dysmorphias, like people who think their arm isn't theirs and such (and yes that does happen). What he says is when you treat someone like that, you don't cut their arm off to make the physical match the mental, you treat the mind and make the mental match the physical. Again, while I don't agree with him. I can at least…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 03:36 PM
4

Woahhhhhh your logic is triggering mannnnn. No logic. Only feels.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 09:12 PM
18

Motion to sunshine?
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:38 AM
1

Thats actually....oddly specific. But yeah...makes sense actually.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:32 PM
1

Well, you're not wrong.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:22 PM
1

Picture caption implies dads in the picture tho
/r/MensRights16/05/14 03:08 PM
11

I think the real question this article shoulda raised is who the fuck names their kids knoxten, kale, kruz and kemper?
/r/MensRights16/05/14 11:41 AM
2

Jesse. We have to cook.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 07:28 AM
2

Her credawhatnow?
/r/MensRights22/03/14 07:27 AM
2

Maybe because the overhead on selling slaves is lower? So the profit margin is larger compared to how much basic drug supplies and processing costs?
/r/MensRights11/03/14 06:58 AM
2

I think she's an insult to acting and comedy. I know nothing of her feminism. Nor do I care.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 08:00 PM
3

It was all the other times it was posted too
/r/MensRights09/03/14 07:49 PM
1

The only way to win is to not engage.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 09:05 PM
10

I don't think anyone is defending the behaviour. Just stating its not rape. Someone on my fb posted this saying it was definitely rape culture and one guy came put and said yes, its reprehensible, yes its deplorable, yes its awful, but its not rape, and they cursed him out for being a rape apologist.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 02:32 PM
0

More hot? Yes possible. Less talented? You'd be hard pressed.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 04:15 AM
1

Well wouldnt you as an employer discriminate against people who work less hours, and want easier schedules.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 08:46 PM
2

Wtf are speech codes? I went to university in Canada and we didn't have those.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 07:35 PM
14

Also keep in mind that NYC women are often considered some of the most shallow or second most shallow women behind LA on the planet.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:59 PM
4

Just imagine how much more they'd be making if they weren't getting 70 cents on the dollar! Or...70 pence in the pound? I don't know the conversion.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:59 AM
3

That's kind of like arson, murder and jaywalking isn't it? Yes its a sad state of affairs when drug dealing is the jaywalking
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:20 AM
24

I'm sorry. I worded that poorly. I meant the general public not YOU in particular. It wasn't a personal thing. Poor pro-nouning on my part. More like Amateur-nouning, am I right? Ah you're a great crowd.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 04:31 PM
31

The point is you shouldn't need assume all male teachers are paedophiles. Putting in cameras in every class with a male teacher is like saying you don't trust them not to molest kids. I can't imagine for the life of me why men wouldn't enter a profession that assumes they are all kiddy Diddlers.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 03:54 PM
1

Yay apparently no one would cooperate and they just were catty all the time and yeah. Was just awful. She thought it'd be exactly what this article said, like so much better and such a great environment because there'd be no sexual harassment but an office of all women was actually infinitely worse
/r/MensRights24/10/13 05:02 PM
2

Someone needs to find that story and post it of the woman who started and all woman business and how absolutely awful it was for everyone And closed in like two years.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 04:56 PM
1

People would call him a liar and it wouldn't get national coverage. He'd claim it. They'd say he was lying. And it'd disappear.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 12:53 PM
2

Well they're only half wrong. It means people who are comfortable with their own gender as presented at birth, not what they said. But it is a bs term made up by special snowflakes who didn't want to use the tern normal. Even though statistically it is normal. In any other situation a subgroup of less than 1% would be deemed abnormal. Science.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 03:30 PM
5

Because cispeople are a hugggggggggggeeeeeee majority and thus, of course, are automatically a shitlord for not being trans. Also by being a man omg. Double shitlord status. And if you're white? Sweet Jesus. You are LITERALLY Hitler.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 03:27 PM
4

Well it is a 50/50 shot. Either they will. Or they won't. 50. 50.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 06:23 AM
8

Shcum* ftfy
/r/MensRights30/07/13 07:18 AM
1

I disagree with you on one point. Most feminists seem to think, or rather feeeeeeel the patriarchy is like some kind of bogeyman who's keeping women down.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 03:21 PM
1

Wait...this is true isnt it? For the most part at least?
/r/MensRights24/06/13 11:28 PM
1

Like sexual abuse from a man in power.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 11:25 PM
1

I think the real question here is..why do people care what Gabe thinks about trans* (is that the right term? tell me if not please) people. He runs a gaming webcomic. He organized partly one of the bigger conventions around. He was partly responsible for a great charity to give kids toys. Why does he have to have an opinion, let alone the politically correct one on this issue. Its completely irrelevant to him probably. There are LOTS of issues I don't care about. Why must he? Don't get me wrong.…
/r/MensRights24/06/13 11:13 PM
-1

Its a word that refers to the over 99% of the population who identify with the gender they have. Also we are the villains somehow because we don't bend over backwards to accommodate a group of people who are estimated to be .3% of the population.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 01:28 PM
1

Shhhhhhh we woulda never known!
/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:41 PM
11

The pay gap? Its a myth I thought.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 02:47 PM
4

I think both types of those point aren't right. Mothers get mothers day. If you're a single dad. Not for you. Fathers day is for fathers. Single mom? Today wasn't for you. I don't give a colleague at work a secretaries day present because I don't have a secretary lol
/r/MensRights17/06/13 06:23 AM
1

But by your example there is 800 rooms available to male students and 1000 available to female students. That's not equal was my point. I was meant to believe title IX was for equal resources between both genders. Like in a sport say, there is $10000 available for male football gear. Then there should be $10000 available for female football, regardless if the team is smaller or not. If I'm misinterpreting the ruling please let me know.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 06:21 AM
1

It will not. Five bucks sayeth so.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 05:49 AM
1

But if there's a coed dorm. And a female dorm. Then that would seem to indicate that there is less housing available to male students, no?
/r/MensRights17/06/13 05:48 AM
0

Why does everyone feel like they need to be apologetic to a group that at best is less than half a percent of the population. And that's giving a veryyyyy liberal rounding.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 05:32 AM
1

No the radfems are the bridge people. Hell not even that. They're playing scrabbleship.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 05:31 AM
2

Oh no the giraffes and rhinos are mating! The pandas are loose! Why do I have all these zoo problems?! Help me feminism!
/r/MensRights17/06/13 05:30 AM
2

Its funny to me that they mention not knowing how to spell centre, considering I think its only America that spells it er.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 05:28 AM
1

I don't find it hard to admit it is. I tweeted that it was right away. I just don't care that it is, and don't see the problem.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 02:39 PM
1

No feminist has ever said something wasn't a rape joke.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 06:45 AM
1

Did they forget when they show the second round and she, a white woman, told the black man, that she was going to own him. No outrage there Lol.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 06:43 AM
2

I figured it would fit because it falls under "creep" shaming and how SHE could use a man for her purposes and she revels in that, based on the assumed homosexuality of said man, but once she finds out hes straight and interested in her, hes a creep and hes using her. And that that is bad, but her stance isn't.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 10:26 PM
2

Woah. Woah woah woah. Gay MEN are objects.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 09:19 PM
2

The thing that bugs me is she admits she was going to use him as a "gay best friend" and that it would help her career to have him as a friend. Then when he hits on her hes a creep just using women and blah blah. Double standard much? Also: her attempts at hiding who he was by changing his name would have worked better if she didnt say what he did for a living now, that he was writing a memoir and that he used to be in a band. Most Canadians can figure this out in two seconds.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 09:00 PM
3

Then stabs the body until her arm gets tired. Damn misogynist arm. Getting tired n shit.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 02:57 PM
1

Like....how many daughters are we talking about? Like, after three I'd throw accidentally out the window.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 02:57 PM
2

lol I was like wow Male Privilege comment out of nowhere! Then I remembered this was an r/menrights post because I was also perusing r/gaming today. Then I relooked and was like, yeah ok makes sense lol. Not that I'm disagreeing with you. You're totally correct, just not used to seeing it outside of here. Which I didn't. I'm not sure why I'm writing all this, lol
/r/MensRights07/06/13 03:00 PM
5

I whole heartedly agree and that was actually the point I was rather hamhandedly and quite frankly, poorly trying to make. Counting them in the % of gamers who are going to spend ~$60 per game and targeting them in that area of the market is incorrect and may result in lower sales. AAA game companies just play to the base.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 01:44 PM
6

They also consider girls who play farm ville or angry birds as gamers.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 01:08 PM
11

Now that's just incorrect. They've never said please.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 12:55 PM
2

Why not both?
/r/MensRights06/06/13 04:11 PM
1

OK. Was then.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 10:25 PM
1

I honestly think the best way to combat misandrist feminism is to push spokespeople like Chanty to the forefront of discussion and just sit back and let it slide. Just look at that report from Toronto earlier in the week. It'll work.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 07:16 PM
1

Gunther! No! No bottles!
/r/MensRights04/06/13 07:11 PM
7

But not with the person that it should be. She aims to open a discussion, that was the whole point, but acts like a preacher on a mount, above us and not willing to listen. We are meant to take what she says as gospel and go forth with it, not thinking for ourselves.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 06:15 PM
3

When she says discuss she means listen to what I say is right and shut up and be good little boys and girls.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 06:10 PM
3

Its not a discussion though. A discussion has back and forth. She makes up stuff. People respond with "um. No" and she moves on. Its as much as discussion and asking your wall to play chess. The wall isn't going to answer and never will.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 06:05 PM
2

So is the 1 in 4 thing. Or 77 cents on the dollar.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 05:19 PM
1

That IS what a feminist looks like. Dworkin is A feminist and that's what she looks like. They don't allllll look like that but that's not what was said lol
/r/MensRights04/06/13 05:15 PM
1

Everyone's opinion does not matter to some degree. If I told you in my opinion the sky is red. My opinion wouldn't matter. The sky is not red. That is fact. We deal here a lot in the concept of facts vs opinions. So if someone tells me in their opinion 1 of 4 women will be raped for example. Their opinion doesn't matter because factually, that's not right. That opinion is no more important than dogshit on my shoe.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 05:08 PM
21

Should and will are two different beasts lol.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 07:30 PM
23

Why would they cancel the mother/ son one. She had no problem with that one. Watch this story. They'll have the mother son one. Five bucks says it goes on without a hitch
/r/MensRights01/06/13 07:27 PM
1

And all I'm saying is and don't take this as confrontational or anything but because they are allies in SF doesn't necessarily apply to the rest of the continent. I've seen more comments from feminism commenting negatively on trans or homosexual people than I have supportive. Specially in the case of male homosexuals and really any kind of trans people as they don't consider them real women or gender traitors for becoming men.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 06:13 PM
2

Can we not use the P word? Its silly and really doesn't mean what feminists and SJW have made it mean.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 05:13 PM
1

Fair. I meant more accepting of alternative lifestyles. I should have specified. Also. Does alternative lifestyles still fly or???
/r/MensRights01/06/13 03:35 PM
3

Not to be rude or dismissive or anything...but let's be honest.. SF is a bit more accepting than the rest of America.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:26 AM
1

Rape is way worse than the holocaust yo.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:21 AM
6

Mannnnnn I dunno if I should report this rape or not ... I know. A comedy show. That's what I need! This rape thing from last night will just sort itself out. Whatevs
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:19 AM
-1

Its funny to me that Norton wouldn't touch that because I listen to O&A and he talks bout banging nasty hooker and trannies. But you're probably right lol
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:18 AM
13

I thought Godwin's law was that the longer a discussion goes on the internet, the probability of someone being compared to Hitler approaches 1. 1, in probability meaning a sure thing.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 08:07 PM
2

To be fair, that poster looks like its from like 1992.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 06:37 AM
0

Why would that bother me? Gentleman sounds classy as fuck.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 04:17 PM
1

No no. If he's annoyed and or disappointed you stopped halfway through he's still a rapist. Even if he isn't then the part before you stopped it still is rape. When he asked to talk to you that was rape too.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 06:06 AM
2

If he's a public defender, he may not have a choice. People have the right to legal representation in America, and not to sound heartless or combative with you, because I do agree with you to a point, but Defense Lawyers know that they will eventually have to defend someone they know is guilty. That's the career they chose. And by Law they have to try their best to get them off. Thems the breaks.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 03:34 AM
1

Damn skippy its treason. High treason, and the punishment of high treason is DEATH. By being dropped into Lilith Fair (is that still a thing?) with a T shirt that reads "Rape is cool"
/r/MensRights10/05/13 04:21 AM
2

I don't know if someone wrote this already and if so I'm sorry to repeat but, I don't get too upset when a Defense Attorney in a pretty much open and shut case, tries to use something like this to get a lenient sentence. Is it wrong? Yeah it is. But Defense Attorneys have to try to get their clients off the hook, however they can. That's their job. So if they try this method then they have to prove it, which they clearly didn't in this case. Burden of proof really nullifies this kind of actions …
/r/MensRights10/05/13 04:16 AM
6

Dibs on being pope then.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 02:07 PM
2

If I were doing it I'd have examples of all different kinds of victims, and all different kinds of abusers and everytime someone "drags them away" by going to the website, they could randomly pick one victim and one abuser. The two subjects are obviously shot separately so it wouldn't be that hard. Also, by doing it this way you could get information on which Abuser/Victim combination stays up on the screen the longest and thus gets the least amount of attention, of course adjusting for peak hou…
/r/MensRights07/05/13 03:23 PM
1

The Patriarchy is a bogeyman. Spoken of only to have a villain that can be easily blamed for any and all shortcomings. It doesn't really exist. Its just an easy answer. My life sucks? Patriarchy! I didn't get that job? Patriarchy!
/r/MensRights06/05/13 04:32 AM
2

This list feels a lot different when its not being yelled out by a woman with bright red hair telling people to shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 06:47 PM
-1

Everything women do that's positive is because of women. Everything they do that's negative is because of men. Somehow this logic checks out for them.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 06:44 PM
17

Yeah it was shame that the doxxing thing happened. But its not like other subs have spread information without checking it for veracity ever which may or may not led to an innocent man being killed and dumped in the water. Whewwww. Glad you see you guys are on top of the REAL villains.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 03:41 AM
3

I was confused until the one in bolded italics. Then I was completely clear. Whew.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 01:25 AM
1

I'm glad they pointed this out. We need to get this Mussolini fellow!
/r/MensRights21/04/13 10:55 PM
21

Mine was closer to lime 75% female easily.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 10:18 PM
3

Just remember folks, if your argument is weak...just scream it very loud. Then you win.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 05:37 AM
2

Also... awful haircuts. Awful haircuts EVERYWHERE! Off topic and shallow I know. Tie me up the PATRIARCHY rack for my floggings.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 05:20 AM
7

"The idea that some people are more desirable because of superficial physical attributes is part of PATRIARCHY" Good to know Feminists don't want partners they find physically attractive. I have some feminist friends who go out with guys I, as a straight male would even consider "good looking". I better go inform them they are strengthening PATRIARCHY Also, I thought it was the patriarchy, like a system thing. Just calling it Patriarchy makes it sound like some kind of evil Bond Villain-esque se…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 05:18 AM
0

You saying someone can't live of 60 k a year?
/r/MensRights04/04/13 09:04 PM
2

But to the best of my knowledge no such place exists. So I'm forced to release her back in the population.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 09:04 PM
2

Being born not disabled isn't a privlege. Being born disabled is a disadvantage. When the norm for a situation is to be one way. Its not privilege. Its being "normal" or "average". Saying people are privileged for being born like most of the population is just abled guilt talking. Ugh I hate that I even typed that. Actually you know what. Anyone who says they have privileges just because of their race or even gender are just being forced to feel guilty for something that A) is not their fault. Y…
/r/MensRights22/03/13 02:24 PM
29

To be fair. They only flew into buildings that ONE time. Well three times but one day.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 06:02 PM
3

Honestly. Ignoring her is the best thing to do. Using logic and facts to counter her points is seen as hate speech and misogyny so just let her sit in the little corner crying victim to the work and treat her like a child throwing a tantrum. Ignore it.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 06:28 AM
1

Still no part of this VERY long statement covers the point of my original comment which was...not 70 whatever cents on the dollar that a man makes. FOR THE SAME JOB. This...AVERAGES...across the board...so if you think its discrimination that someone in a "sales, clerical and service" job isn't paid the same as someone who performs a trade or a riskier position. Then yes, by your incorrect definition of what discrimination is, it's discrimination. If Women only made what essentially breaks down …
/r/MensRights15/03/13 08:12 PM
1

It's still not 73 cents on the dollar for the SAME work, which is the point they tried to make with that statement. The concept that women on average makes 73 cents for every dollar a man makes for doing different, lower paying work, really means nothing. If it was two people doing the same job then its a point but its not. It makes sense that someone swinging a pickaxe underground for 12 hours a day makes more per hour than someone who sits at a computer and types.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 07:18 PM
1

Dunno bout America. I'm Canadian and it can happen here. Google "Dave Foley Child Support" and see
/r/MensRights13/03/13 05:08 AM
2

Good luck ever proving those things lol.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:40 PM
2

Great statement and very good points except for one. The 73 cents for every dollar a man makes is a misnomer. That's an average among allllll men vs alllllll women. And its generally accepted that that is the case due to men being more likely to take high paying yet high risk jobs such as underground Cole mining, etc
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:37 PM
2

Specially since once your sentence is over. Theyll ask you if you can pay the child support now, which you won't be able to. You were in jail. And if not guess what? Back in you go! Rinse, repeat.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:27 PM
16

Actually I'm pretty sure by this point just being a heterosexual male makes you guilty of rape.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 09:59 PM
2

No it's the Patriarchy's fault! Sue...um...all men? Yeah that sounds right. Also can we change the word for "persue a course of legal retribution" from sue to a more gender neutral term, the word Sue is also traditionally a womyn's name and thus makes it seem like all womyn want nothing more than to get back at people when they're really just fighting for equality. or something.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 09:21 PM
14

No no, by feminist logic he still raped her. Sighing is clearly a form of coercion. Remeber if your girlfriend doesn't want to have sex, being disappointed is rape.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 09:16 PM
2

Don't be silly its 83% of stats are made up on the spot.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 08:33 AM
10

This makes the most sense actually.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 10:18 PM
2

Problem is for a lot of rules in schools these days such as ones that would apply in this scenario, its all a no tolerance policy, if you say something that offends or bothers someone in either the context of a classroom discussion such as this one which may or may not even be intentional, or utilized as an insult on the schoolyard, are handled exactly the same by administrators in schools.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 06:29 AM
7

4chan often gets it right. Just so often it's mixed in under layer and layer of stupid BS lol.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 03:26 AM
14

Read my other reply. I was reading the title like "Oh, Men need to be told to not spend their child support at a bar and women don't". This is my bad, lol
/r/MensRights27/12/12 03:59 PM
8

AHHHHHHHHHHHH gotcha. I was reading it wrong. Thank you!
/r/MensRights27/12/12 03:53 PM
93

Um, I don't see how this doesn't target women as well less this is a men only bar, which could never happen ever. I am however, extremely offended by those t's on that sign. A lower case t is a straight line down, then a straight line across. Not a line crossing an s. Jesus.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 03:45 PM
2

They will look up and shout at me, "Take it back" I will look down and whisper, "No."
/r/MensRights06/12/12 04:23 AM
2

No, some regular feminists ( as in not radical) would accuse me of being a rape apologist. Radical feminists would accuse me of being a full on rapist.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 08:55 AM
16

No TRUE feminist would act like that. Allowing men to be part of their protest an all. These womyn are fakers. FAKERS. I dare declare!
/r/MensRights05/12/12 01:06 AM
2

You may consider it consensual and unwise sex. Feminists consider it rape. On the woman. The man however, is not raped in this scenario and is a raping pig. You see the disconnect.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 01:04 AM
23

The point is no one is disagreeing with the message. Rape, on the whole, is bad. However, by only showing men as the perpetrators of rape, whether intentional or not sends out an awful message. Let me put it another way, using an example. If a group put out posters instructing people that stealing was wrong, and no matter what the circumstance its wrong. Slogans like "Even if they don't really seem to need it, STEALING IS WRONG" "Even if they leave it unlocked, STEALING IS WRONG" "Finding it on …
/r/MensRights05/12/12 01:02 AM
5

I only commented on the irony of rebutting the statement with the tools used by the other side for purposes of a quick humorous statement. This is all.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 09:10 AM
-1

Thats basically the feminist movement in a nutshell isn't it? Oh wait, is nutshell genderbased language? Shit. Um well thats the movement in a small organic natural protective casing, isn't it? Better.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 08:56 AM
8

Ok... a simple "wrong" would've done just fine.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 08:40 AM
1

No...I get what your saying, but this billboard is in my town. That's not what they mean at all. If it was, I could agree to that. But the amount of underaged prostitutes in this Northern Ontario City is practically nil. They mean women, but by putting the slogan as Real Men don't buy Girls in implies that the men in the situation are taking advantage of women who dont know any better and are just girls. Their pronounced message is to lower violence rates against women and this is somehow suppos…
/r/MensRights23/11/12 09:25 PM
1

This barber doesn't exclusively cut men's hair though. He cuts women's hair as well but only if they are related to him. So he's not discriminating against her as a woman, its because she's not related to him and that goes against his religious beliefs. And if i'm completely honest, if one of us is sounding like an idiot, its the one who resorted to personal attacks. Thank you. Good day sir. and/or Madam. I don't know and I'd hate to be brought in front of the OHRC for misconstruing your gender …
/r/MensRights17/11/12 12:46 AM
1

Again I'm unsure you're aware of the definition of the terms misogynist, legitimate, and discrimination. She was in fact, asking him to provide a service that he was not already providing. He did not provide the service of haircuts for women. She was asking him to. His shop does not do this. So this is exactly the same thing.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 12:30 AM
2

Yes, because I agree with the small business owner, I am a misogynist. The man CLEARLY hates women and has been somehow operating in this manner under the radar for years now. Thank the lord SOMEONE finally had the will to stand up to this evil bastion of discrimination. Heaven only knows what would have happened had he been allowed to continue on this way. Millions of women everywhere could have been forced to live with long straggly, out of control hair. Complete and total anarchy would ensue.…
/r/MensRights16/11/12 11:32 PM
2

I am Canadian, and the OHRC has almost never sided with the defendant in its entire history. It's a joke. A joke that ruins peoples lives. And who's to say he DOESNT have someone who cuts women's hair? Maybe they just werent there? I don't think he should be forced to move or change his career because of his religious beliefs. And I care because this is an outright case of "Your rights end where my feelings begin". This woman could have just gone to a different shop and that would be a lot easie…
/r/MensRights16/11/12 11:02 PM
2

So this man loses his livelihood because some woman got her feelings hurt. Great law.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 10:50 PM
2

She's employing then human rights council to do exactly what she said and force him.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 10:30 PM
3

She outright stated she was going to force him to cut her hair. She doesn't make it a discrimination issue saying the shop is sexist. Its because SHE felt bad about it.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 09:58 PM
2

No this woman just went to the Human Rights Council about this shop. Which will likely close the shop, charge the barber exorbitant amounts of money as a fine and completely ruin his reputation and make him a criminal. But no. Thats fine.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 04:11 PM
2

Agreed. But this isn't a legal case. The Canadian human rights council isn't a branch of the legal dept. And trust me if you have seen some of their other rulings you'd realize that law has nothing to do with it at all because its borderline harassment to any accused peoples. Its basically a feelings police. Its a joke.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 03:06 PM
8

It has entire relevance as it the same situation but gender reversed.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 08:21 AM
5

The point is though, he only has one religion. She has a choice of barbershops to go to. For example, every single one in the GTA except for that one. There's thousands of choices.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 07:17 AM
5

Because they know that if theyre successful and the guy does hit her they can claim OHHH HE HIT ME I DINT DO NOTHIN AND HE HIT ME, and people will believe her. Look at that bus driver who just got fired.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 05:14 PM
6

Dressing all slutty like that. Your beard is just going down the street not even wearing anything.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 05:07 PM
5

No I dont think its nice because its fucking patchy as shit.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 05:07 PM
2

No, theres no male guides, because young girls need a special place where they can go and feel safe and only spend time with other girls. I was in scouts, or more specifically Cubs when this got changed. I remember asking how the actual fuck that was fair (paraphrasing) when it happened then. I was like 10 and realized that wasn't kosher.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 05:05 PM
2

Like I'm not advocating violence against women, or even prostitution, but putting up a billboard with this kind of slogan in order to "raise awareness about women's issues" is kind of completely missing the mark, no?
/r/MensRights14/11/12 06:06 AM
14

The key is there, you have already procreated. That's the difference.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 03:10 PM
1

Reverse the genders on that story and take it to /feminism or SRS and say your response. See if they see it the same way. Its rape mate.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 07:26 AM
3

I got farther in this then I probably should have before I realised this was satire. It was during the bit on the man putting up posters, and how obviously she was in the right because she was the majority. THATS where I clued in. I must be tired.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 11:42 PM
18

It doesn't HAVE to be used that way. But it is.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:03 AM
0

The articles indicated do not show any disdain for other comments except for those aimed at women, such as "get back to the kitchen" etc. So thus, my statement is valid. Way to fly off the handle and kneejerk a reaction though. Great show old bean.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 04:33 AM
1

Your own mom? Thats messed up mate.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 11:09 PM
3

But they dont care about the other groups. They only care that females are being made fun of.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 11:08 PM
1

No it doesnt necessarily mean males cut back on aggression, females could just bring up theirs. Ideally though they should meet in the middle. Or just handle things their own way.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 11:06 PM
2

Yes.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 07:01 PM
3

I've seen feminists cry because I didn't agree with them. Let alone for anything that may actually warrant it.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 02:47 PM
2

Not who you wanted, but I'll play this role, You Hitler loving little Hitler who had scrambled Hitlereggs for breakfast and a buttered Hitler for tea.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 04:07 PM
1

Yes. That was simple. The ONLY one I MAY have an issue with is a female doctor for purposes of privacy and all that. That having been said, I have had a female doctor before and it didn't bother me, so I guess that point is moot. So yes. I would be. All of those. Gender is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 04:06 PM
1

I dunno, Ive never really had an umbrella that didn't almost immediately break on me. Its just a little rain, who cares? If its pouring then Ill usually just wait til it dies down. I was stuck in my office for like 2 hours on Tuesday for this reason, lol.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 04:02 PM
2

I dont even use Umbrellas. Like...ever. Thats why god invented hoods.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 03:42 PM
1

But, its problems with BOTH. So still equal.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 07:52 PM
6

It professes caution when it comes to avoiding being the victim of a crime. If you put up posters saying "Remember to lock your doors or you may be burgled" would that be victim blaming? If you were to post a poster saying "Dont walk around late at night with large sums of money in your hand" would THAT be victim blaming? Avoid being the victim of crime is something everyone should do.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 05:11 PM
4

Can anyone please explain to me how this idea of "if we boost women, everyone will benefit" came to be so prevalent, whilst making not a lick of logical sense in any way, shape or form?
/r/MensRights31/07/12 02:57 AM
1

Where does the 30 medal possibility come from? Like what sports are men competing in and women arent?
/r/MensRights26/07/12 03:15 AM
8

Its a similar story in the Winter Olympics. There was talk of getting rid of Women's Hockey as an Olympic sport. Not because of misogyny, but because Canada wins EVERY TIME. Only one other team has come close, and that was America. Now, Im Canadian, so us winning every time is no skin off my ass, but I can see how the other countries and the IOC can perhaps see the point of not having an event thats basically just there to give us a free medal.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 03:14 AM
4

Didn't you know Magic Mike is sexist against women. Somehow.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 02:57 AM
-3

Because you can't express displeasure with anything posted? It just becomes a giant circlejerk now. Or I dunno whatever the feminism equivalent is...CircleShlick? Whatever it is. Its just "Hey I think this" and then everyone goes YAYYYYYYYYYYY
/r/MensRights25/07/12 04:52 AM
3

I know this because I read the articles and followed the case and did my research. And its not bias in Men's Rights, its belief in the legal system as its written. Innocent. Until PROVEN guilty beyond a reasonable shadow of a doubt. Convincing twelve people hand picked for being willing to convict without physical evidence is not beyond a shadow of a doubt, nor is it likely a jury of his peers, two bases of the American Justice System. And all I'm saying is, the case presented by the prosecution…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 04:45 AM
11

ummmm male privilege, rape culture, woman's sexuality is empowering and blah de blah blah blah. You know the drill.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 04:37 AM
4

Because in America, hes innocent until proven guilty beyond a shadow of reasonable doubt, And hes not. Its not necessarily the girls are lying, its that the case is not strong enough for a conviction with the evidence or lack thereof presented. You keep comparing this case to Gerry Sandusky and thats a false comparison. A better comparison to this case is the Casey Anthony trial, there was MORE evidence she was guilty, but LIKE in this case the evidence is all circumstantial and hearsay, and thu…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 04:34 AM
2

46 different people who are unconnected providing similar stories is a much stronger case, than two girls who are friends saying something happened, with LITTLE evidence, and no OTHER testimony corroborating their story, the testimony is at best circumstantial evidence and not enough to prove guilt beyond shadow of a doubt, which is what is required for a guilty verdict. If you cannot tell the difference between 40 plus people testifying, with corroborating evidence, on events that happened over…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 04:23 AM
2

46 victims and secondary witnesses as well. This case had two eyewitnesses. Who were also the victims. Its ok though, you can just admit you know nothing of the law. Its alright. We wont judge.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 04:05 AM
4

You shouldn't convict someone for a crime if theres an even less chance then that. Its reasonable doubt. Reasonable doubt is far less then 50%
/r/MensRights25/07/12 03:59 AM
6

He is innocent until the prosecution PROVES he is guilty withOUT a shadow of a doubt. This case is going to set a record for fastest kick in the ass on appeals. And it should. And there should be public apologies abound when it does.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 03:58 AM
3

Except eye witness testimony is statistically proven to be unreliable, especially in times of heightened stress. The fact that they were at a party and not one single other person except the two "victims" have any testimony, any other accounts, no others stating they heard anything, no physical evidence, no nothing, this case should have been thrown out before a jury could even be selected. DA's and ADA's who only claim to fame is a conviction rate percentage have screwed up the justice system i…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 03:55 AM
11

Because their rights end where her feelings begin.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 02:03 PM
1

Sure the main characters of sitcoms may be men, but lets take a look at the type of men that usually are the centre of sitcoms. Fat, middle aged, dumb as a sack of hammers, completely incapable of performing even the simplest task without their beautiful smart independent wife doing it for them. What kind of role model does this set for young boys? Find someone to take of you because you're too stupid to do it yourself?
/r/MensRights19/07/12 12:29 AM
-1

Is it though? All men in TV or film fall into two categories. Hot attractive men, or fat guys who are dumb. Thats it. If your overweight and a boy growing up, you may as well just try to be funny in your idiocy or else its gonna be a hard ride for you.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 12:02 AM
39

If its 4chan, theyre just linking here because they hate reddit and think the blowback will be hilarious. Think nothing of it.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 03:39 AM
2

Well I think the real question is who the fuck stuck Schrodinger in that box with a potential maybe rapist?! And How big is said box?
/r/MensRights17/07/12 05:08 AM
2

The thing is you can never comment on personal responsibility when it comes to rape scenarios because feminists claim thats victim blaming. Its not. Its precaution. They argue they SHOULD be able to do whatever they want and not fear being raped. And you know what.. they should be able to. But they can't. I dont want my car stolen, so I lock it. I dont want to be mugged so I dont walk in dark alleys or alone at night. But when it comes to the crime of rape its allllllllllllll about the perpetrat…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 05:06 AM
2

Im banned from SRSDiscussions because I had the full blown audacity to say if your very sensitive to off colour humor such as rape jokes, dont go see comedians who tell rape jokes instead of making everyone else fit what you define as acceptable.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 06:07 AM
1

Sorry yeah I meant, ~2250 people will be raped per year. Amount of times each is practically unknowable, and thats at least 6 per day.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 04:27 PM
1

Well it says one in 4 women, so I figured one in four of the 35000 women on average. But I think you're right. Also, ~2250 assumes an even break on gender in enrollement, which isn't the case, there are actually more women then men in Colleges in the US. So your ~2250 is the LOWEST it could be.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 04:12 PM
-1

First of all loaded question. Any level of rape occuring is digustingly common. One per year is disgustingly common. Secondly, women are usually kept off front line fighting and placed in support roles where there is a much lower risk of being killed by enemy fire. Does this mean that there aren't any rapes and sexual assaults in the Armed Forces? No, and the number presented here are disgustingly high. Second that 1 in 4 of college girls will be raped or assaulted in a four year period has been…
/r/MensRights12/07/12 02:36 AM
2

Yes. thank you. I used this image earlier in a discussion on the same topic.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 01:44 AM
0

Not gonna lie. I almost stopped reading at the point where you said we live in a rape culture, then I read the rest of your first paragraph, and almost quit again. Then I soldiered on. and regretted it. You don't like him? Dont watch him. Thats your constitutional right. Meanwhile I think he's hilarious, so I'll continue to support him.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 01:26 AM
1

Im proud of myself for who I am. And I happen to be straight. Thats just who I am. Im not begrudging people who aren't.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 03:02 AM
2

I'm proud of being me, who just happens to be a straight white male. That doesnt make me exclusionary of other races, sexualities or genders. Also would you say having gay pride implies its shameful to be straight? Also, I feel being gay is normal to that person, thats who they are. I think that however you are, that is whats normal to you.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 06:34 PM
1

ughhhhhhhhhhhh hate the herp/derp name stuff...sooooooo much. Its just overplayed.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 06:32 PM
1

Its not sarcasm though. And when I say no response its not like couple hours or anything, its like 5 minutes.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 06:30 PM
1

ONE just posted that tweet. Ok Ill say it was twitter, lol. Just tweets that then that led to the conversation as read. Just checked now, prior tweets are of an unrelated nature, mostly referring to some late night roadwork.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 05:16 PM
4

I think she does think that or why else would it have hurt her? Anyways Thank you for your replies, this was the kind of debate and discussion I was hoping for and really feel both we as MRA's and Feminists need to have. Open, honest debates about how we can all move forward into just being people.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 07:40 AM
6

I didnt mean like having a white straight guy parade, just like taking pride in being comfortable with who you are. And no, they didnt say I couldnt......... but that if I was it was sexist and exclusionary. Implying that by being proud in myself, and who I am, I'm putting down everything I'm not. Why do I have to justify my pride? Is it because of my race? My Gender? My Sexuality? Why can't I be afforded the same right of pride as everyone else? by this logic I can only be proud of the ONE mino…
/r/MensRights08/07/12 07:27 AM
4

Yeah but thats nto what I was saying, I just meant being proud of who you are is a good thing, and something I hope everyone could achieve. It isn't by nature exclusionary. Like do I just not get it?
/r/MensRights08/07/12 06:56 AM
3

Thats what I thought too! Thank you! I mean in all fairness, and PLLLEEEEAASSSEEE do not take this as a shot but r/menrights probably isnt the most unbiased spot for this, but its really the only outlet where I can feel sort of safe enough to ask. I considered even making a new account for this to cover more bases, but said screw it. If I'm not safe here, I really have nowhere, and that was just unbearable.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 06:45 AM
3

Ok there. Hadta spell out the numbers. Reddit kept changing them back for some reason. Whatevs. Fixed.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 06:35 AM
2

OH SHIT. You're right. All those ones after the first one are actually twos. Ill fix it :) Thanks.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 06:33 AM
3

What can I do to clear it up?
/r/MensRights08/07/12 06:30 AM
1

I honestly don't see it as an offense, that you went and saw it, You want to? Go! Enjoy it, if your so inclined. I am mildly offended at the amount of coverage its getting, and just the general acceptance of it. If the genders were reversed, there would be an uproar. And it's just the double standard that bugs me, not the content or whatever. I'm not seeing it, and thats my feelings on it. Not for me. Doesnt make me begrudge others who do want to see it.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 06:06 AM
15

The "if you actually watch the damn video" part specifically.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 03:22 PM
18

Again, you're counting for professional fighters. These clearly aren't. Which you can see if you watch the damn video. Also you can stop the condescending. He gave her every opportunity to quit, if anyone is pushing you around for that long, eventually you're going to strike back. Bravo to him for holding out as long as he did.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 03:14 PM
20

Depends on where you hit someone, bare fisted, if you hit someone in the proper spot on the jaw, they'll go down. Its the "button" you always hear about in MMA or Boxing. It actually doesn't really take all that much force, specially if someone isn't expecting it, or been hit there before. It just rocks your head.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:59 PM
9

But its still making and possessing child pornography if he's 17.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 12:48 PM
4

To be fair, I live at home, but only until my house is all renovated and good to go. Gonna be fantastic. 3 bedrooms, converting one into an office and one into a pirate themed bar, a deck, hot tub, and nerd shit everywhere. I am a responsible adult lol
/r/MensRights29/06/12 07:24 PM
33

Gotta love how they refer to MRA's as all being bitter divorcees who need hugs, and this is perfectly acceptable, but if anyone were to refer to a group of feminists as hairy bull dykes who need a dicking, we would be hung, drawn and quartered. Fuck everything about this woman, this website, and every website under the gawker banner.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 06:31 PM
-1

I think one of the issues about this is, with increased funding, attention and departments to Women's Health, with no such plans for any offices etc for Men's Health, we're potentially looking at another Title IX case here. There's only so much funding available for health care expenses, and splitting it between offices that cover both Gender and a separate office for Women's health will in fact cut funding to Men's Health from an appropriate approximately 50% to approximately 25%ish. The fundin…
/r/MensRights28/06/12 07:21 PM
4

I didn't laugh once. This was just boring and sexist.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 01:01 PM
8

Sorry I did not gather that from your post. Apologies all around!
/r/MensRights24/06/12 04:48 PM
23

That is a great theory. Except for the bit where its completely made up claptrap and completely ignores all psychological data on people who are identified as Psychopaths or Sociopaths. But yeah.. Beyond that bit where it's factually incorrect, its great. Keep putting it out there though, I've noticed that when it comes to discussions on "rape culture" facts are really irrelevant when there's "feelings" about.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 04:40 PM
1

Here's a video, theres also long articles from the DOJ that are really dry. This was the simplest source I could find, mostly just to save your time. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knXHUQ2A1J4 This page is also pretty well put out and clear http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/men-outnumber-women-among-american-rape-victims/
/r/MensRights23/06/12 12:30 AM
2

Specially since a recent study showed that if you include prison rape, actually MORE men are raped each year then women.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 07:48 PM
2

Wait wait wait... feminist website...talking to a feminist... ok I can see this. Immediately describe said feminist as Foxy. What? Beyond that however very well answered questions from what feminists should strive to be.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:29 PM
1

This. Right here. This person is on the friggin ball. Put it better then I could. Bravo sir and/or madam.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 10:50 PM
5

Essentially any time you hear someone tell someone else to man up, thats the case. We dont even notice it anymore. Its just accepted as something thats done. And you know what, Im not even mad that thats the case, but IMHO if thats going to be accepted, then it goes both ways. Thats all really, I mean people are gonna trash talk, theyre going to say things, I get that. I dont want only PC friendly language. Anything but. Deep down however, I want it to be equal. To be fair. Im not the language p…
/r/MensRights19/06/12 08:42 PM
3

Oh. I know why, lol. But more often then not we're just told to man up, or accept our privilege, and that our concerns/feelings/need for equality is unwarrented, and that we are really just afraid of feminism or that were afraid we're losing our power. Younger people today, myself included, I'm 26, never had that power, and are being pushed down and vilified for something we had no part of.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 08:34 PM
3

Its saddening really. And people wonder why we have pages like this..
/r/MensRights19/06/12 08:22 PM
3

Well good that you don't because it really was not my intention at all. But yeah theres another kickstarter...maybe an indiegogo I dont recall, but its essentially the same project as the tropes vs. women, but for men. and they will donate anything above their costs to charity, and they named the charities, and they at last time I looked, were approximately 1/3 of the way there and have been labelled as trolls and that theyre idea wasnt a real problem or anything. Its horrendous.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 08:17 PM
5

I see and hear men making comments about men all the time. Look at any competitive game and listen to how many people are straight douchebags, regardless of gender. I think the problem is larger then just douchebaggery along gender lines, its pangender. The problem should be treated as a global issue, not a feminist issue, or a trans issue. I would sincerely hope deep down we're past that. Thats all.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 08:13 PM
6

My personal shitstorm with the kickstarter campaign is its essentially the most successful scam in recent history. That woman vlogs for a magazine for her job, so she gets paid there, shes gets money from youtube partnering so she gets money there and she still asked for 6 grand to play video games. Her argumentsd are weak and contradictory and layered with so much bias you could put it in a panini press and pass it off as a 12 dollar meal at taco bell. Also any money donated over her 6 grand ta…
/r/MensRights19/06/12 08:11 PM
4

Sorry, I didnt mean for it to come off that way. Specially not as like a "HOW COULD YOU WASTE MY TIME WITH THIS" What I mean is, even a video like this shouldn't be dont be a dick to women or transgranders...it should be ..dont be a dick. Period. To anyone. The message of the video itself is flawed and a wee bit sexist, implying its ok to be a douchebag to men. Does that make sense?
/r/MensRights19/06/12 07:58 PM
1

Ok, I guess my professors just werent as concerned about it because they focused on the message and not the media. My bad, continue on.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 07:51 PM
7

Its not, but Im not a douche to anyone. I dont need to be told that I doubly dont need to be a douche to women and transgenders. I'm just not a douche to people. And most animals.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 07:50 PM
3

It means to be a miserable pile of secrets! Now Have at you!
/r/MensRights19/06/12 07:48 PM
11

Stopped watching as soon as he started on about being a man is "privledge". Tired of this mentality.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 07:47 PM
1

For 5) I thought the proper statement should read "When one considers the national debt crisis, they must reflect... Then again I have a degree in Psych so maybe its different for econ which is I believe considered a science as opposed to Psych which is considered an art. (I have a BA in psych, not neuroscience, or anything like that)
/r/MensRights19/06/12 05:02 AM
0

LOL @ winning arguments with Feminists. That never happens, regardless of the language you use.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 04:55 AM
2

Stupid isn't the right word. Ignorant? Close Minded? Better. and ALL feminists? No. Some? The most vocal perhaps? Yeah sure.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 08:54 PM
8

I dunno, I get what your going for here, but I'm a guy and I just think this is funny, almost a refuge in audacity kind of thing. Only 18 and 25 I'm like...enhhh no. But overall its just a joke. I don't get why your church handed them out, but I take it a jest, and I'm one who thinks that Comedy shouldn't have boundaries or else we won't be able to joke about anything. and I want to avoid that slippery slope. I commented on this the first time it went up, then that got deleted, so Im transcribin…
/r/MensRights17/06/12 07:55 PM
2

I dunno, I get what your going for here, but I'm a guy and I just think this is funny, almost a refuge in audacity kind of thing. Only 18 and 25 I'm like...enhhh no. But overall its just a joke. I don't get why your church handed them out, but I take it a jest, and I'm one who thinks that Comedy shouldn't have boundaries or else we won't be able to joke about anything. and I want to avoid that slippery slope.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 06:20 PM
36

Except if you go on youtube, where the Tropes vs Women videos are being released, there are in fact hundreds or thousands of videos covering the exact same topic. So she is in fact adding NOTHING to the conversation except one more voice going "Video Games dont represent womyns well!" It's been done, she still got 6 figures to make more. Watch her other videos, she's not even a good vlogger, she contradicts herself in her own videos all the time just to push her propoganda.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 06:11 PM
2

Your number 2. isnt ENTIRELY true. Its not that they thought oh she made lots of money to do YouTube videos by exploiting perceived sexism in Video Games. It was actually to show that this woman was exploiting feelings in the feminist community in order to raise money for what should and could be done for free. You'll also notice they added in at the bottom any money they don't use for the project will be donated to charity, which actually makes their kickstarter a touch nobler, IMHO. The tropes…
/r/MensRights15/06/12 05:23 PM
8

I admit I got this off 4chan, lol. BUT if you type in the address located on the bottom of the picture. All the information is there, plus references and all that :)
/r/MensRights06/10/11 05:09 AM
28

Well I mean if you have dissenting data from peer reviewed unbiased sources that can be referenced and reviewed, go ahead. I won't stop you, in fact I welcome it, any statistical information can help bring balance and due diligence to the equality debate on both sides.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 05:07 AM
17

The picture is fucked, agreed. No argument there at all. The comment stream however? Fucking golden.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 04:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter