TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bronkula Archive

View 0 posts and 29 comments by bronkula on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Not if she's in the chair. She's rooted in a device, and that device is gangly as fuck, and she has no need to move, and a large feeling of security.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/15 04:59 PM
2

Not that half the conversations in this subreddit don't devolve into the exact opposite of this. "If you say bad things about men, you are wise and I respect your freedom of speech. If you say bad things about women, you are a disgrace to humanity."
/r/MensRights05/02/14 04:33 AM
2

This is an episode about MAN's rights. Not MEN's rights.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 11:51 PM
0

well now you're actually being very contradictory. You are at least partially your body. To separate the mind from the body is to be selective in what comprises a person, and doesn't seem to me to be genuine. If your mind wants peanuts, but your body dies, then part of you wanted it. If your body wants sleep, but you have work to do, at least part of you wants rest. There can't be a genuine and full separation of what the body wants versus what the mind wants, and say that one is the person and …
/r/MensRights30/12/13 03:05 AM
2

Well now, hold on. Let me just say, you're getting very defensive and downright retaliatory, and that has no place here. Second, I think the statement "NO.. if a women organism during rape there is no part of her mind that in anyway wanting it" is not only poorly worded, but also incorrect. My initial question was, if a woman orgasms is it not possible that part of her "wanted it". Whether her mind wanted it is not the whole of the question. Her body is part of her. If a man orgasms during rape,…
/r/MensRights30/12/13 03:00 AM
2

That page makes no mention of the percentages of what creates a sexual response in women versus men. I would posit from my own limited experience that women DO in fact receive a larger portion of their orgasmic stimulation mentally, and not physically.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 01:56 AM
-2

But that is exactly what we're supposing. Is your body not you? Are you saying that what your body wants can be somehow NOT what you want? This is a paradox if our body's wants are not at least partially that of the whole.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 01:54 AM
-6

I'm going to be COMPLETELY controversial here and put a thought into the mix. Understand, I am merely supposing this for the purpose of argument. On some level, if a woman orgasms during a sexual encounter of any kind, based on the way that women experience orgasms (largely mentally), does that not mean that she DID in fact want it? on some level? This is merely an academic query.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 12:32 AM
1

It is important when dealing with this issue to establish some terminology. Namely, if you want to make maximum impact, it must always be referred to as "genital mutilation". This is the term used for female circumcision by opponents of that event, and so should be used for male circumcision as well.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 11:00 PM
-9

I think the problem here is, you're confusing boys to men.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 09:52 PM
1

As soon as private institutions are no longer allowed to create their own pricing scheme based on whatever criteria they see fit. Seriously there is nothing wrong with this. It's a problem of supply and demand, not anything more nefarious.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 02:41 PM
20

Perhaps this is the wrong direction to go, and would be more damaging to your cause than helpful.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 03:00 PM
44

You need to get the word bigot into your vocabulary. Calling these people an equally disparaging but completely accurate word totally flips their shit.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 12:29 AM
1

No, my point would be that the card for bitch would have the word feminist on it.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 10:44 PM
99

This is a non issue. like family feud, it's based on predisposition and colloquialism. they're not saying male means sexist, they're trying to stop people from saying "male chauvinist pig". or "blank chauvinist pig" or male blank pig" or any other variation. it's a popular phrase which is instantly recognizable as someone who is sexist. saying feminist, would just cause people to guess bitch.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 09:14 PM
50

To be fair, the one on the right came first, so you could take it as a bit of growing up.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 10:03 PM
4

I what? Slow down buddy. I'm saying he had people there. who gets in their car and takes off before everybody's in? Get out of the theatre? sure. Leave the parking lot? No. Who does that?
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:16 PM
6

Is it fair to say, he's not being demonized for refusing to meat shield, he's being demonized because it appears he just up and left. like he had people there, and he fucking LEFT THEM. that's fucked up.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:04 PM
4

None of these things are the issue. Those are issues that non game creators would come up with. Actually the problem is female lobbyists who make it so that violence against women in your video game gets you harsher ratings penalties and therefore severely limits the people who can potentially buy your game.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 05:06 PM
5

I'm sorry but anyone that censors themselves, much less uses the ridiculous "b-word" or "c-word" phrases, can't be allowed to participate in any intelligent discourse.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 02:43 AM
4

Because its derogatory and doesn't lend itself to logical discussion. It's also completely jarring in an otherwise reasonable debate.
/r/MensRights27/05/12 07:15 AM
8

his use of the term bull dyke completely negates any relevance his argument would have otherwise had.
/r/MensRights27/05/12 04:25 AM
4

Sure. confused, surprised, all those things. nothing says uneasy though. no apprehension is registered on her. just shock. shock is fine. the point is that it IS shocking.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 01:57 AM
15

not necessarily uneasy. just surprised. let's not make a problem out of something potentially innocent. There is no emotion on her face, and so any emotion you put on her is your own. she is clearly hesitating, but i just think it's her shock at noticing the point of the picture which is that men are taking on a larger role in childcare these days.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 01:11 AM
4

Actually, I'll bet this has nothing to do with gay men. This looks to be about the shift in current sociel climate where men are taking on a larger workload when it comes to child rearing.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 01:09 AM
1

I may be that guy, but i'm genuinely interested in what these tackics are ensuring.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 03:29 PM
6

If for nothing else, it's the incredible double standard of women saying that female genital mutation is horrible, and then thinking it's their right to cut their boy's penis.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 01:23 AM
22

Actually almost none of them look anything like "hentai" unless you want to say hentai looks like anime, in which case you sound racist. ibuki: covered, hokuto: covered, ingrid: covered, juni & juli: covered, crimson viper: covered, area: covered. blair dame, i've never heard of, but her and cammy have one piece suits, nothing overly bad about that. there are a couple non characters, and then elena, who looks very tribal, albeit showing a lot of skin, although not showing more skin than dhalsim.…
/r/MensRights26/02/12 07:26 PM
6

Its worth mentioning, that though this article says women tend to initiate divorces, this fact does not disprove the disloyal husband myth. It merely means that men are potentially unlikely to initiate a divorce even if they are unhappy and thus cheating on a relationship. But really, it doesn't correlate to anything directly. Its just a wild assumption.
/r/MensRights03/09/11 04:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter