TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bruisedunderpenis Archive

View 0 posts and 144 comments by bruisedunderpenis on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

Loosing control of the Witness further proves the complete incompetence if these Officers. So they should restrain the victim, as far as they know, not the violent suspect as far as they know. Got it. You're just actually retarded. This all makes much more sense now. Yes, talking to people is generally a better approach if you want to avoid violence instead of charging in guns blazing. And you just conveniently missed the part where that's exactly what they did when they arrived on the scene and…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/19 04:52 PM
18

Calmly talk to people? And figure out what's going on? Calmly talk to a guy who as far as they know punched a lady in the head several times and therefore is likely to get violent? You're delusional. Instead of chasing and physically assaulting the first black guy they could find would be a good start Go watch the video again you numbskull. She gets out of her car and starts stomping up to the witness guy like she was going to fight him, pointing at him, and saying "It was him right there." They…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/19 04:47 PM
9

What exactly do you expect them to do differently? With the information they had available to them in the moment, the two men they attempted to handcuff were dangerous individuals who had already beaten up one lady and were potentially dangerous to the other people there at the scene. How do you want them to handle these, as far as they know, dangerous people? Just leave them unrestrained and a continued danger to everyone? Or should they restrain them while they get to the bottom of what actual…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/19 04:39 PM
26

To be even more fair she literally started marching up to the witness dude, pointed at him, and said something to the effect of "It was him, right there!".
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/19 04:32 PM
28

She started going up to the guy and was pointing and saying "that's him right there" and the cops had to hold her back. Coming into the situation cold for the cops, they have no reason not to believe her. Go watch it again. It definitely wasn't just "Quick! Arrest the nearest adult male!".
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/19 04:31 PM
167

Same. But just a tip for anyone if they find themselves in a remotely similar situation, just go with it and be as cooperative and calm as possible. Throwing in a "yes sir" or two will help too. While they're yelling and trying to cuff you because they think you're a dangerous person is not the time to be trying to convince them of anything. They're not listening right now. Let them cuff you. Let them secure the scene. Then calmly explain that you're the witness not the suspect. Yeah being handc…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/19 04:26 PM
30

"I wasn't driving, I was traveling"
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 03:48 PM
2

Even if the dude had taken her to the police station and got himself arrested, you still would think it’s bullshit. Not if someone was able to actually point to anywhere in the law that justified it. All you want is to sit around with your buddy’s and circlejerk and nod in agreement. Who are my buddies supposed to be exactly and how are you drawing any conclusions about them? You’re not interested in any opinion other than yours. Wait, what happened to my buddies? You proved nothing, absofucking…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/18 12:43 AM
1

Very well. You're unable to justify your position and would rather sulk away. That's fine. You have not convinced me in the slightest that what I described is kidnapping. Perhaps another person who agrees with you that it is will be able to offer a more reasoned, less assumption based, and less meandering argument that will be more convincing in the future.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/18 12:10 AM
1

Wow. You can't be serious about being this obtuse. I very clearly meant that I would not respond to the second and third replies to the same one comment because it would create unnecessary duplicate threads. I did not mean that I was going to stop discussing with you completely. If you want to walk away that is fine too but as of right now you've provided an opinion and some assumptions but have not provided any let alone sufficient evidence or justification for those assumptions. I laid out for…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/18 12:05 AM
1

Nobody was talking about use of force. You are. That's literally the most basic assertion of your entire position. Without some kind of force preventing her from making the decision between getting out of the car and staying in it, there is no kidnapping. You can't even keep track of your own arguments at this point. Threatening behavior does not require ANY use of force to be deemed threatening. Once again, that's not what I claimed originally, at any point, or even in the comment you quoted. E…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/18 11:50 PM
2

replying multiple times to the same comment only serves to derail the conversation. I won't be responding to any more of them. You can use an edit or you can add to a future comment. One comment thread with you is enough like pulling teeth, I don't need three separate ones going simultaneously.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/18 11:30 PM
1

I didn't ask for a definition of aggression, I asked for you to indicate what part of your definition of a threat involved aggression. By providing this definition that I was not even contending, you've only added another layer of assertion that you need to now justify because it only brings up more contradictions. the fact is we are arguing that if the driver would drive to the police station instead of staying there and waiting for the police to come, that would constitute kidnapping. The crux…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/18 11:26 PM
1

That's not what objective means. You have not addressed the point that was made. ob·jec·tive /əbˈjektiv/Submit adjective 1. (of a person or their judgment) not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts. No part of that definition has anything to do with judgement based on protected classes like your irrelevant assertion about your impartiality claimed. Once again, you have provided a definition and offered no justification for how your argument fits (becau…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/18 10:47 PM
1

Lmao, not objective? Fuckstick, I’m looking at the actions of the two parties here, not their gender, race, social status, religion, creed, or sexual orientation. If the genders were reversed, my opinion would still be the same. That's not what objective means. You have not addressed the point that was made. Already explained this in detail. The woman’s body language was not one of aggression, whereas the guys was. Aggression is not an element of the definitions you provided, meaning aggression …
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/18 10:19 PM
1

INTIMIDATE Means to intentionally say or do something which would cause a person of ordinary sensibilities to be fearful of bodily harm. It is not necessary to prove that the victim was actually frightened, and neither is it necessary to prove that the behavior of the person was so violent that it was likely to cause terror, panic or hysteria. As far as threat, Black’s Law Dictionary defines it as this, bolder for emphasis: A menace; a declaration of one’s purpose or intention to work injury to …
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/18 08:34 PM
1

Great. We're on the same page now. Was the woman's aggressive and loud behavior a threat of violence or intimidation according to the definitions you provided?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/18 07:06 PM
2

Proof of what? You want me to go link to a definition of a term that we already agree on? Tell you what, any concrete claim I've made that you feel is unsubstantiated, throw it out. It's completely unproven and uncited, you can ignore it. I have no evidence but my own reasoning. Your sources are far superior to mine and I'm arguing from behind. Now that we've established that let's focus on your arguments so we can establish a good baseline for what your assertions are and how your sources apply…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/18 06:56 PM
2

Do you agree that because of her threat of violence, that the video posted is evidence that she was not only trespassing but also guilty of unlawful imprisonment as well? Why are you so scared of women? Did your mommy molest you when you were younger? I'm applying principles and laws equally to women and men. Why are you trying to protect women from responsibility? Do you think it gives you a better chance of finally getting some pussy? You’re flipping between sitting there on the corner and dri…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/18 06:49 PM
1

Nowhere does it state that a threat must be explicit Neither did I. I said it required intent which is part of the IL criminal code that would be the jurisdiction applicable to the video. Doesn't matter though. You accept that definition of a threat and intimidation and you assert that such a threat is a reasonable basis to conclude that that fear was being used as a means of force to prevent the woman from leaving. Her being scared is the impetus for concluding that if she were moved it would h…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/18 06:33 PM
1

to believe that violence or bodily harm was possible. That's not what a threat is. A threat is intent of imminent harm not possible harm. Every single person walking down the street can possibly harm you. They aren't guilty of criminal intimidation for that. His behavior would lead a reasonable and prudent person to believe that he was willing and capable of violence Same lack of comprehension, see above. Earlier it was about being arrested in your home, That was in response to a hypothetical th…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/18 05:40 PM
1

The threat was implied, or using your favorite term, implicit. No it was not. A threat is an expression of intent to do harm. What action implied he intended to cause them harm? You seem to have this weird fiction in your head of women being these fragile helpless creatures who need protecting. They were just as loud and aggressive as him yet I don't see you arguing they used fear and force to keep him there against his will, aka false imprisonment. Or are your heels that far dug in now that you…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/18 05:21 PM
2

So in addition to not even remotely understanding the meanings of kidnapping, rape, consent, and force your current tack is to demonstrate your complete lack of understanding of the meaning of a threat too? That's a bold strategy considering no threats were made, neither according to the IL criminal code nor to any rational person who understands calling a person a bitch and a cunt is not the same thing as expressing an intent to harm them (which is what a threat is btw).
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/18 04:57 PM
2

Submission requires force as well which is once again, as always, the missing part of your blatherings. There was no force whatsoever in the original situation. You are aware that women have agency and are in fact capable of making decisions on their own without being forced right?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/18 03:48 PM
1

Youre actually a moron if you cant see the difference between having no power to stop an attacker while being raped and having the power to get off a bus and choosing not to. Especially if you think the law doesn't make that distinction either. Again to fix another one of your false equivalencies, to relate it to sex it would be like telling a sexual partner in the middle of already consensual sex, "hey I'm going to do this different thing. Let me know if you want me to stop and I will" and then…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/18 03:25 PM
1

There are different kinds of consent and sexual consent is irrelevant in non sexual situations. The kind involved here is called implicit consent. Because you were not forced to choose the option you chose and you knew the implications from the beginning, you are implicitly consenting to the choice you made. You get on the wrong bus. You go two stops before you realize. When you realize this bus is going downtown but you want to go to old town, you tell the bus driver you wanted to go to old tow…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/18 11:31 AM
1

The only way this ridiculous attempt at an equivalency would be relevant would be if in that situation the "victim" were actively holding the groper's hands on her chest and refusing to let him remove his hands. Youre being absolutely ridiculous. He is not keeping her in the car, hes trying to get rid of her. The only person forcing her to be there is herself.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/18 04:50 AM
2

So your contention is that the police can only arrest someone if they have a warrant, correct? Nope. My contention is that after letting her out according to the hypothetical request from her that you posited, filing the police report with evidence, and going home, a warrant is required to enter his home and arrest him thanks to his 4th amendment rights. In the above example, I wanted to go home, not to the police station. I did not consent to be taken there. You knew I was in the car, and you w…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 11:56 PM
3

Lol. I'm the one who's getting info from TV. That's rich coming from a person who thinks police can go and arrest someone at their home with no intervention or approval from the courts based solely on the word of one individual. It's okay. You're wrong. You don't know the workings of the law as well as you thought you did. It happens to everyone and it's not the end of the world. That's how we learn and grow as people. There's no need to lash out at me with your own projected insecurities. Take …
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 10:49 PM
12

That's what the video evidence of you calmly and without threats giving her numerous and continuous opportunities to leave of her own volition under no duress of any kind is for.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 10:40 PM
3

Yes, but informing the dispatcher let's them send word ahead to the station. It also let's the passenger know you're not fucking around and if they choose to stay, that's where they're going. It also lets the passenger know that the police are well aware of the situation, their location and that he's not just driving off and kidnapping her after giving the police all of his information. It establishes a trail of accountability, redundancy and evidence in case she tries to claim victim status.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 10:34 PM
7

I'm not the one spinning anything. I'm plainly stating the facts of the situation to unspin your attempts to remove and dismiss her agency and replace it with a nonexistent obligation on his part. As for the time argument, the only way he's even getting arrested from her report in the first place is if a warrant is issued for his arrest, which requires presenting the facts to a judge. No judge is going to approve such a request given that the video evidence of the entire situation was already pr…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 10:30 PM
16

It boils down to taking someone to a location they did not agree to go to. That is not what is happening if you tell them where you are going and give them the opportunity to get out first. By staying in the car after being clearly informed of the eventual destination of the vehicle she is agreeing (on video) to be taken there. Trespassing does not magically give a person temporary rights to occupy their victim's property and dictate what they do with it. Hailing an uber does not give the rider …
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 10:10 PM
23

If I got the go ahead from the dispatcher first and I had video of the entire interaction I'd be much more inclined to find out.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 09:31 PM
16

Kidnapping requires an element of force. It is not against her will if she is willingly staying in the car knowing full well the intended destination. If you get on the wrong bus, the bus driver isnt guilty of kidnapping if they refuse to take you where you intended to go after you realize its not going where you want to go.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 09:25 PM
51

Its not kidnapping if you give them every chance to leave, including at any time during the trip to the station. Especially if you have video proving it. Especially if you inform the police prior to doing it. She was a trespasser not a captive.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 09:21 PM
98

He should have asked the dispatcher to give him the location of the nearest police station and offered to bring her there himself.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 08:23 PM
11

About as helpful as preaching to the choir, which is to say certainly not harmful but definitely not that helpful either. The only people who might not understand the basic concept this sub was built on would be screeching sjws that like to brigade a post or two around here every once in a while and I highly doubt anything you said would sway that type of person.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/11/18 07:01 PM
89

You literally just spent a few hundred words describing the pussy pass, the exact concept this sub is centered around. How did you expect that to be an unpopular opinion here?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/11/18 06:47 PM
7

My favorite part is the friend in the black coat laughing (but trying to hold it back) who's clearly thinking, "bitch what did you think was going to happen?"
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/18 03:54 PM
1

To be clear: PPD DOES NOT MEAN THAT A WOMAN NEEDS TO REFER VERBALLY TO HER GENDER. FEMINIST ACTS, A MAN DEFENDING HIMSELF, AND OTHER SITUATIONS WHERE WOMEN DO SOMETHING THAT IMPLIES THEY WILL SUFFER NO REPERCUSSIONS ARE FAIR GAME. REASONABLY THOUGHT OUT EXPOSURE OF FEMINISM IS A GRAY AREA. VISIBILITY OF SAID POSTS WILL BE DETERMINED BY VOTES.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/18 09:07 PM
18

She knows she's guilty too because she knows it's her stuff that's wrapped up. An innocent conscience wouldn't jump straight to "he's kicking me out" from a few odd shaped gifts on her birthday.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/06/18 03:38 PM
3

which is a whole argument in and of itself on which method is the most effective but that's not the point here. I see you stopped reading half way through their reply and just climbed right up on that high horse.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/17 04:26 PM
25

Not required for a citizens arrest. That's the job of the cops who show up. Only notification necessary for a citizens arrest is that you are placing them under citizens arrest.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/17 09:28 PM
6

You realize he never said anything about liberals right?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/08/17 11:22 PM
51

Ooooohhhh! I can't wait for all of the new r/all people to get autobanned from triggered subs. That will be fun.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/08/17 05:25 PM
3

It's barely a bee sting (if that), but that's when you're not hopped up on adrenaline while in a fight. Stun guns' only useful purpose in these situations is intimidation.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/17 04:00 PM
2

Sex is not an item being sold. Consent is not a contract with a specified term of obligation. If she she didn't want to do anal and told them to stop but they didn't, then they raped her. Even if she told them she wanted to have sex. Hell, even if she had agreed to have anal but changed her mind. It doesn't matter. If she told them to stop and they didn't, it's rape.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/17 03:27 AM
1

Pretty sure PPD is more about the spirit of the situation, not the reasoning given by the DA though.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/17 03:24 AM
4

He-said she-said and the case thrown out is a far cry from "girl cries rape" and PPD worthy though. It's also quite odd that they aren't charging the 18 year old with statutory rape considering the girl was only 14.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/17 11:03 PM
22

Not to piss in anyone's cheerios, but the case was dropped because she went into the bathroom willingly, even though she still maintained that she told them to stop mid-way through. In the police report she said she told them to stop when one of them stuck it in her ass but neither stopped. Add to that the attempts by the school, school district, and the city to cover the story up or downplay it (along with implications about the city's sanctuary city status) way before the surveillance footage …
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/17 09:47 PM
3

If there is an immediate danger to your life or of severe bodily injury you are legally (in the US) allowed to escalate to the use of deadly force to get away. That does not protect driving full speed into a crowd blocking the highway and not slowing down. That does not protect driving through a peaceful march that happens to be around you. That does not protect almost any of the situations people talk about when this topic comes up. If you were say surrounded by a violent mob in your stopped ca…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/17 05:44 PM
7

"Show me what a police state looks like!!" Officer: "Uhh, hey dumbass. If this were a police state you'd all be arrested for this whole little bitchfest going on here. The fact that you aren't in handcuffs is the perfect indication that you aren't in a police state." ... ... "Uhhhh" "Show me what a police state looks like!!" "This is what a police state looks like!!"
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/17 12:25 AM
1

Berlin, Ohio...
/r/PussyPassDenied22/12/16 12:04 AM
-1

Avoid the Christmas market in Berlin. Security is pretty tight these days.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/12/16 05:51 PM
38

Not just one man. A whole fraternity if I remember correctly. She claimed they all raped her as an initiation or something like that I believe.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/11/16 10:44 PM
18

We don't know the amount yet. It could go up or down at this point.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/11/16 10:42 PM
5

I'd be fine with it if the damn kids in my neighborhood realized that yes, it's fine to play in the street, but the street is for cars. When a car comes, GET THE FUCK OUT OF THE WAY OF THE 2000 LB STEEL MACHINE THAT COULD CRUSH YOU LIKE A BUG WITH THE ANGRY LOOKING DUDE IN IT. They just fucking stare at me like I'm a fucking alien species come to visit earth. And their parents aren't any better. They'll be sitting out there watching the kids play chicken with a fucking car. And still don't do sh…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/16 03:55 PM
-1

Alright, this sub has apparently run it's course. It's just a TiA repost factory now. There apparently aren't any actual PPD posts left to post. Let's all just cut our losses and migrate over there.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/16 03:32 PM
2

He's currently up against a lady that's just as bad this election, and the fact that he doesn't support trump is hurting him in the polls. Last I heard it's essentially too close to call (he says he's winning by 3 points she says she's winning by 3 points, both say there's a margin of error of 3 points). It seriously worries me. As much as I dislike Heck, Cortez-Masto is soooo much worse it boggles my mind how she's doing so well.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/10/16 11:34 PM
1

Except movie tickets cost 4 times as much today as they did in '84, the '84 movies budget was about 1/4 of the budget for the reboot, and that number they used is not adjusted for inflation. The reboot profited nowhere near 77 cents on the dollar compared to the original.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/16 03:47 PM
2

At one point she kind of started to mention quotas which leads me to believe that part of the anti-discrimination act involved requiring certain numbers of women to be hired. As a training academy/staffing company, there could be some value in focusing more on women to help companies meet the quotas. Basically, come to us to get your women and meet your quota. We've got guaranteed good ones just waiting. I'm not sure if that's actually their business model though. They didn't do even a mediocre …
/r/PussyPassDenied06/10/16 06:32 PM
9

Even if the two companies were worth the same amount, the deal they offered would be worth only half of whatever they thought they were claiming when they said "20%". 5% of Company A, worth $100, is $5. 15% of Company B, also worth $100 is $15. The total equity bought is worth $20. 20% of $200 (the sum of the two companies values) is $40. Which is why you don't "split" the equity like that. You specify how much of each entity is being offered.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/10/16 06:15 PM
10

The fact that you think people are upset about you liking silverman speaks to a very distinct lack of awareness. No one cares if you like her. Trying to act high and mighty about one of the most subjective topics in the human experience tends to not go over well regardless of where you are and who's around. And in this case, where little to no objectivity is available, the best course of action is to turn to the professionals who we assume know more than the general public. And many, many, many …
/r/PussyPassDenied05/10/16 04:36 PM
21

Not to defend child pornography viewers or creators, but that's a highly illogical jump to conclusion. It may be common, or even the majority of cases where the intent is to spread it as much as possible. But you don't know what was on his phone, who made it, why they made it, if he made it himself, if the creator shared it with only him, if they posted it online, if they are selling it, etc, etc. Don't get me wrong, no matter the reasoning it's still deplorable and unforgivable, but you can't k…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/16 03:59 PM
2

It very, very, very barely applies to this sub in that "exposure of feminism is a gray area". It's not a PPD though.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/09/16 09:27 PM
6

kind of, but only if by support, you don't mean "believe 100% no matter what". I can be supportive without actually believing what you said in the absence of evidence.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/09/16 09:26 PM
1

I think you're right actually. Although a very effeminate one and I thought I saw a pony tail.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/16 07:09 PM
-3

Hate Lopez. Like he's probably my least favorite comedian of all time and he says some of the absolutely stupidest shit of any human I've encountered. But this one time, he's ok in my book for standing his ground (assuming it's actually him since there's no verified check mark).
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/16 04:51 PM
24

Meh, it's a bit of a stretch but not as bad as some other stuff around here lately. The second girl guy was essentially white knighting because "but she's just a girl, how can you be so mean to her?!?" (the assumption being that the second girl guy wouldn't have even considered doing the same for an "innocent little boy", it was all because she was a girl). The original girl wasn't attempting to use the pass, but the second girl guy tried to use it on her behalf and was subsequently denied.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/16 04:48 PM
1

I like /r/holdmyfries. It's not the same but it's decent enough.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/16 03:58 PM
7

Like, 1 day in, then a steady downfall.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/16 03:55 PM
6

She had a job, was taking a paycheck, and making enough to not only live on but to save up a certain amount as well (presumably enough to move to a new city and start over), as she mentioned in the post. This is not an instance of a woman who has no access to money and is stuck, this is an entitled girl who wanted more from her sugar daddy but didn't get it and is now trying to steal from him to "make up for it".
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/16 04:03 PM
3

Most likely not.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/16 03:57 PM
1

Are we going to remove the rule saying that anti-feminist posts are a gray area then? Don't get me wrong, I love those posts but they just aren't relevant and there's tons of other places on reddit where those can go (including /r/feministpassdenied now).
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/16 03:53 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/pussypassdenied/comments/4k65qk/introducing_rfeministpassdenied/ Try again
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/16 03:51 PM
2

It is a problem if those people are going to continue posting content like this that has nothing to do with this sub. A little decent content (plus whatever good content) > lots of irrelevant content that encourages even more irrelevant content. Plus, it's never going to be a default so just adding viewers doesn't help anything either so why bother encouraging even more crap like this just for a few more subscribers.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/16 08:49 PM
2

When it's those borderline PPD's, sure maybe you could argue it would help. But like I said, this is a whole other step further away from a PPD even beyond those questionable ones. There's no entitlement, no expectations of special treatment, no acting as if there are no consequences, there's not even a female involved, basically none of the elements of a PPD. It shares as much with a PPD post as the farming videos share with cooking content like I mentioned earlier, which is to say they basical…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/16 06:57 PM
1

My hope is that the more people who see content here, subscribe and come back might one day post content of their own and the more people posting the better chance of more specifically relevant stuff showing up. That is some weird logic. You're trying to attract new people with content that doesn't belong and you think those people will come along and post stuff that does belong? Why would you not just expect those new people to just post more of the non-relevant stuff since that type of stuff i…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/16 06:41 PM
9

Even then, it's a stretch to put it here though. Now we've gone beyond the "implied pp" posts where it's not really a PP attempt, but it's sort of assumed that she thinks a certain way because that's how girls are treated, etc, etc. Now it's that, plus the fact that there's no actual female anywhere involved, and we're using an extended and modified definition of a PP. It's just too far removed from a PPD if you ask me. It definitely should go in /r/tumblrinaction instead.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/16 05:04 PM
26

I'm not usually one to complain about the sometimes questionable pussy-pass denial posts that keep this sub from being dead between actual denials of actual pussy passes, but both of the people in the picture are men, there's no implied or explicitly stated special treatment, it's not a man having to defend himself from a woman who thinks there will be no consequences, none of that. How in the actual fuck is this in any way related to a pussy pass being denied? Don't get me wrong, I love the pos…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/16 04:29 PM
1

I'd say he occasionally cites sources with bad methodology (just like everybody else btw) but very very rarely when it's one regarding a major issue. The more questionable ones tend to be the ones that support his signature little trolly asides rather than his main arguments.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/16 04:44 PM
3

Milo is not a credible source but to his credit most of the sources he cites are.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/16 11:03 AM
3

I believe China has some really weird regulations surrounding films about ghosts/spirits/etc for some reason. Plus the whole sjw/third wave feminism gimmick is not even remotely as accepted over there. China is not a market where this movie will do well, so banking on the Chinese market to help out is going to be unlikely to pan out.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/16 11:01 PM
115

If I remember correctly, SONY execs have said that their break-even, all in with marketing and promotions and whatnot, is around $300m (quick tip though: Execs who are doing damage control after a flop will tend to downplay that figure). With domestic sales at only $86m, 2 weeks later, this movie is poised to lose a metric fuckton of money. And I can guarantee that sony doesn't think the SJW/third-wave feminism "message" is worth two hundred some odd millions of dollars out of their pockets. Thi…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/16 10:49 PM
30

/r/tumblrinaction is also prone to auto-bans like that which is quite funny considering they are the subreddit of the day today so the auto-ban bots are most likely having a field day.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/16 08:48 PM
2

You're right. China definitely isn't a good audience for the film. However, Europe may be more open to this particular type of sjw flavored horse feces than even the US. It's not unheard of. It's also light years away from a guaranteed thing though so it's still up in the air.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/16 07:11 PM
2

Apparently sony says their break-even on the film all in (including marketing and whatnot) is around 300 million and I believe the 46 million was just domestic, so if it does well oversees, or if sjw's continue to go see it two, three, four, ten times over the coming weeks it could still break even or even make just a little bit of money. Time will tell, but it definitely won't be a huge success/profit, that much is certain.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/16 06:20 PM
3

It made 46 million over the first 4 days. Not exactly phenomenal but not too terrible. They'll still make money but I can guarantee production companies/studios are going to have to strongly consider how much they value making statements like what ended up happening with Ghostbusters, especially when the other popular shit that gets pumped out lately are making so much more money. For example, even the 561st comic book movie to come out in the last year Captain America: Civil War made $180mil in…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/16 05:28 PM
6

Including 48 year old celebrity actress children.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/16 05:02 PM
2

racism = prejudice + power shitlord! She cannot be racist! Go back to tumblr social justice 101, gah.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/16 05:01 PM
-1

Ohh ok. So the "sell your car and give me cash" bit was in the middle like come back to me and I'll give you these things, not at the most recent protection order hearing. That makes more sense. Although mild extortion seems like a pretty faulty foundation for a resumed relationship.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/16 03:41 PM
19

Wait, why does she want him to move back in? If their marriage is over it seems weird to me that they'd live together. And if she wants him to move in why is she trying to file a protection/restraining order against him? I'm just all around confused on what's going on here.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/07/16 11:29 PM
1

Always good to have backup strats.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/07/16 03:38 PM
19

She was expecting a seat because she is female. It's not the most justice-bonery denial, but I think it's still a ppd. More so than some of the other "filler" stuff that get's posted.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/16 09:02 PM
1

Could be. I'm not sure though, I was just commenting on the implication that because a parent makes some questionable (or outright crazy and horrible) parenting decisions, doesn't mean they are a liar. And it certainly doesn't mean they'd lie about being raped. Obviously still a possibility, but more info is needed to make that judgement.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/16 03:45 PM
6

She didn't lie about those things though so her credibility would definitely not be ruined. Poor decision making doesn't make you a liar.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/16 06:52 PM
1

I've never wanted to be a polygamist more than watching those three actually intelligent and logical women discuss an issue like this. I want to marry all three of them. Where do I find women like this?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/16 04:34 PM
10

Might as well throw in mandatory STD testing and go full porn shoot at that point.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/16 04:17 PM
6

No, because of on-going consent. She can say she changed her mind mid way through and you didn't stop. From now on, all sexual encounters will not only have to have a contract, it will have to be recorded to make sure that there was on-going consent the entire time.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/16 04:02 PM
19

heaven forfend What the actual fuck kind of drugs is your autocorrect on? I don't think anyone has used the word forfend since the middle ages. Edit: now that I think about it, heaven forfend could be kind of a cool idiom too, just a slightly different meaning maybe.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/16 03:52 PM
3

I don't think you understand what cringy means.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/16 04:00 PM
17

This is such a weird and crazy situation. The bill was proposed with no intentions of it actually passing. It was drafted and presented as merely a good excuse for discussion and debate about women's roles in the military today. Then, unexpectedly it get's passed, and now instead of actually making women sign up for selective service (because heaven forbid a woman has to fill out a form that has a statistically insignificant chance of ever meaning anything), they are back tracking so hard, the t…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/04/16 04:46 PM
7

She was talking to a bunch of hhwomens.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/16 05:03 PM
2

Also, men are 16 times more likely to be colorblind (literally). How is this never a talking point when men's issues are brought up?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/04/16 04:12 PM
7

Her dad's a time traveler obviously.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/16 05:03 PM
0

Her body language said she was resisting arrest. That's it. You can't possibly know what she was thinking in regards to getting away with it because she is female, and body language definitely can't convey that detailed of a concept in the first place.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/16 05:52 PM
2

ts a PPD because she resisted probably thinking she can get away with it, Those are some impressive mind reading skills since she literally didn't say a word in the video.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/16 02:54 PM
1

#yesallgirls
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/16 09:33 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qg_cuODF5rU It's a big crowd but it definitely doesn't look like it.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/16 09:31 PM
1

Except with less legal representation. Say what you will about the WBC, but those scum of the earth know how to find some damn good lawyers.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/16 09:31 PM
15

It wasn't a shoplifter arrest. It was a resisting arrest arrest.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/03/16 11:26 PM
2

Bold move Cotton
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/16 11:05 PM
3

Who can blame them? Homosexuality is an abomination, and people don't wanna be around that shit. ... In all truthfulness, the dude who plays the main character kinda seems like a fag. From the commercials it looks like this show is gonna suck. ... (in response to a post in r/penis) you keeping that foreskin clean bro? I'm definitely not a psychologist or anything like that but my armchair diagnosis is closeted homosexual who has been brought up believing that is wrong and therefore hates himself…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/16 05:19 PM
11

I know I've been watching too much Geordie Shore when that sentence seemed completely normal to me for a few seconds and I didn't even notice that I read it in a geordie accent in myme head.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/15 06:37 PM
1

You act as if I wrote the laws and perform the executions myself. I was merely informing you what they meant by the cloudy drug being risky.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/15 09:45 PM
0

And there's a reason those aren't used anymore...
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/15 09:07 PM
2

While funny, the worry is that it might not kill you, and cause inhumane amounts of pain while it's not killing you. Even if you are human garbage that's been sentenced to death, you still have the right to do it relatively painlessly.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/15 08:36 PM
6

It's only even a story because she is a woman. The catholic church was making statements on her behalf only because she is a woman. Her and her lawyers were hoping that the uproar over the death penalty for her because she's a woman would persuade at least someone in the various supreme/appellate courts to commute the sentence. There are tons of stories about "a loving father, who found faith behind bars and was working on getting an education and was the poster child for rehabilitation" that do…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/15 08:35 PM
3

I couldn't possibly care less about your unreasonable butthurtness in this thread. I was merely pointing out that communicating to the ground is very, very much possible, and quite easy, contrary to a claim you made.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/09/15 05:14 PM
3

You can make calls on planes. You can also text, email, skype, facebook message, and if you're really determined, send carrier pigeon.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/09/15 03:53 PM
2

As far as I know there are no explosives that use cat as an ingredient. Explosives ingredients could easily be mixed/hidden in a bottle of sand.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/09/15 03:51 PM
1

Except, controlling for those advantages serves no purpose if you are intending to use the distribution for predictive or correlative purposes. Chess isn't played with advantages controlled for. Any advantages you had or still have are at your disposal when playing chess. Controlling away those advantages when looking at IQ is like "controlling for" height in high school basketball while predicting future NBA prospects.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/15 05:20 PM
3

apparently she doesnt believe young women are capable of doing the same. Does that make her a sexist/misogynist because she thinks females are too shallow to knowingly participate in an "uncool" activity?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/15 04:15 PM
2

I don't think those guesses were necessarily listed because people wanted those subs to be banned (some of them at least). I think it was just people trying to apply the "logic" (and I mean that loosely) behind the fph ban to figure out who might possibly be next. Basically, it's not that they think we should be banned, it's that they think that reddit will think that we should be banned.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/15 06:18 PM
2

Even that has gone soft. Fucking cunt pao
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/15 06:15 AM
2

It's odd how people seemingly understand your sarcasm, yet mine goes way over their head... either way, you still made me laugh.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/15 09:20 PM
14

It's ok. That's just what happens when you jump in the middle of a circle jerk doing the buffalo bill instead of grabbing the cock on your right.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/15 05:59 PM
7

Glad someone got the joke. Unfortunately the butthurt is always very strong in this sub.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/15 05:13 PM
-41

Right?! Using a child as a human shield. Fucking despicable.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/15 03:47 PM
16

This exact scenario could've unfolded As a Vegas local, I can tell you that it happens very, very frequently with guys dressed as comic book heroes as well.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/15 10:25 PM
31

You could have done worse, she's not terrible looking. Although my general rule is not to stick my dick in crazy (which she so clearly is).
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/15 06:32 PM
6

Good, it'll be like an ant trap. Rational people can stay far enough away, let the sjws flock to Goldsmiths, then once it's made a nice good name for itself as being an intellectually bankrupt organization, those that flocked to it will be trapped with a useless degree there and the rest of the world can go on happily.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/05/15 08:58 PM
15

they's ftfy
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/15 08:36 PM
8

Someone with a BSc in psychology should know that sociopath is not a word that has any real meaning. The condition is antisocial personality disorder and in popular culture, people try to pretend that there is further diagnoses that distinguish "sociopathy" from "psychopathy" when there isn't.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/02/15 12:19 AM
1

Sociopath=Psycopath=whatever the hell you want because sociopathy/sociopathic personality disorder and psycopathy are not recognized diagnoses. They mean whatever someone using those words wants them to mean. The condition associated with the terms sociopaths/psychopaths is Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD).
/r/PussyPassDenied28/02/15 12:16 AM
3

Hey! They want everyone to be equal, they just want women to be more equal. Is that too much to ask?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/15 05:04 PM
1

As deserved as that was for that cunty mccunterson, I don't think the chick was trying to pull a real or implied pussypass (to be fair, I do not have audio atm so I may be wrong there). I think she was just beating up on him cuz she was older and bigger. Plus, I didn't see any white knights or anyone egging her on because "wat r u gunna do hit a grl?!?" She's still a twat though.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/15 10:36 PM
2

Even if she wanted to, she probably couldn't afford the legal fees to actually sue you. Also, she has no grounds to sue in civil court and no prosecutor would pursue charges of assault. You're fine. In fact, you might go down to the police station and file a report about her barging into your house drunk and then hitting you. It would definitely cover you back at least a little bit in the event that you do somehow get taken to court.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/14 05:22 PM
7

This is in no way PPD.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/12/14 06:33 PM
1

Don't they have Curves gyms in the UK? How is that any different than a barber shop that doesn't allow women?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/14 02:53 PM
-2

Wait a minute. I know I've seen this video at least 20 times, but is this dude at 1:40 the best trey songz impersonator guy?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/11/14 12:10 AM
2

That was my understanding as well, which is why I was confused.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/14 06:02 PM
3

Why did the friend get the felony charge but the main hood rat only got a misdemeanor charge? Or am I switching the two in my head?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/14 05:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter