TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

brunt2 Archive

View 31 posts and 2,014 comments by brunt2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
722

brunt2/r/MensRights05/09/11 02:12 PM
289

brunt2/r/MensRights12/09/11 02:04 PM
153

brunt2/r/MensRights18/08/11 10:45 AM
99

brunt2/r/MensRights20/10/11 04:02 AM
73

brunt2/r/MensRights12/09/11 02:06 PM
59

brunt2/r/MensRights27/08/10 04:45 AM
30

brunt2/r/MensRights10/09/11 03:36 AM
19

brunt2/r/MensRights04/04/11 02:26 AM
19

brunt2/r/MensRights23/06/11 07:42 AM
16

brunt2/r/MensRights02/07/10 01:51 AM
15

brunt2/r/MensRights17/12/11 09:42 AM
9

brunt2/r/MensRights27/07/11 02:34 PM
8

brunt2/r/MensRights21/06/11 08:25 PM
7

brunt2/r/MensRights17/12/11 06:48 AM
7

brunt2/r/MensRights15/03/12 06:52 AM
7

brunt2/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:46 AM
6

brunt2/r/MensRights10/02/12 05:18 AM
5

brunt2/r/MensRights23/08/11 08:43 AM
5

brunt2/r/MensRights10/03/11 02:40 AM
4

brunt2/r/MensRights20/08/09 01:16 PM
1

brunt2/r/MensRights26/09/08 07:03 AM
1

brunt2/r/MensRights20/10/11 01:31 PM
0

brunt2/r/MensRights24/08/09 07:02 AM
0

brunt2/r/MensRights23/08/11 10:01 AM
0

brunt2/r/MensRights16/10/08 01:08 AM
0

brunt2/r/MensRights28/12/11 04:02 PM
0

brunt2/r/MensRights09/09/11 02:00 PM
0

brunt2/r/MensRights05/12/10 10:52 AM
0

brunt2/r/MensRights28/06/11 05:00 PM
0

brunt2/r/MensRights19/08/11 03:06 PM
0

brunt2/r/seduction13/01/11 02:29 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,014 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Are you a feminist?
/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:33 PM
-1

Do women have different DUI settings?
/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:31 PM
1

You are the one without understanding.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:30 PM
1

You still don't get the or object part. You say when a man is raped the penetrator is the victim, but that sentence states that an object could stand in the place of his penis. GET IT NOW?
/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:25 PM
1

Also it does not include women raping men with their hand. True, but I can see where that's open to debate. I would count that as rape, myself. would you count a man inserting his fingers into a woman's vagina as rape?
/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:22 PM
1

because the sentence includes the "or object" phrase, it indicates the intended reading is that the penetrator is the rapist, not the victim. That and the other problem of the non-standard perp and victim crime definition having both in the one sentence as subjects as necessitated in your reading.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:14 PM
1

For your reading to be correct, the perp and victim are both subjects of that sentence, as different parts of it apply to both. That is where the switch is made. But your reading STILL wouldn't be correct because of the "or object" part which indicates how it should be read. YES HE COULDN'T BE RAPED BY SOME BITCH MASTURBATING HIM. BUT WOMEN CAN BE RAPED BY HAND. The definition favors women.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:07 PM
-1

since there are no consequences for false rape accusations i think men could start crying rape after drunk sex if they don't like the woman or want revenge.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 06:58 PM
1

the definition does not include men being raped vaginally by women and does not include women raping men with their hand on his penis. police are also trained on the definition.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 06:55 PM
12

he's saying a drunk has responsibility for their actions in the same way as they are when DUI
/r/MensRights20/03/12 06:53 PM
-1

if he had the same intoxication level as a female who was raped, then it would seem impossible to say he was not raped.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 06:47 PM
1

but it ruins your bizarre reading of that sentence.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 06:40 PM
1

no it does not simply say that. the sentence includes "or object" which leaves no doubt as to how it is meant to be read. Also it does not include women raping men with their hand. Don't spread misleading bullshit.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 06:39 PM
-1

so a drunk man could not get a woman charged with rape if he went to the police?
/r/MensRights20/03/12 06:30 PM
0

that is stupid and you should know it. crimes are not defined by switching the victim and perp mid-sentence. the "or object" gives it away. also how can a man be raped by some bitch giving him a handjob? even if your dyslexic reading of it were true, hands can't be penetrated. and yes, it does specify the "consent of whom" in the last sentence.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 06:23 PM
-2

engineers want more women to hit on.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 06:14 PM
1

can drunk men not consent, or just women?
/r/MensRights20/03/12 06:09 PM
1

police do not infer either.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 05:52 PM
0

That does not say shit. According to you objects can now be raped. Are these objects the man legally owns?
/r/MensRights20/03/12 05:51 PM
0

what is between those dots?
/r/MensRights20/03/12 05:45 PM
3

judges used to savagely attack gay men. they are extremely prejudiced in favor of the status quo. the status quo is that women have mostly been favored in courts and judges have carried that over into the modern day.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 05:32 PM
2

i can't believe these judges can look in the mirror. but then london itself must be notoriously corrupt by now in favor of the parliament and royalty there.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 05:25 PM
2

exactly. anti women content would have been dealt with.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 05:23 PM
1

judges are definitely not impartial in western countries as they pretend to be. they are clearly deeply biased in favor of women.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 05:21 PM
16

he didn't convince lawmakers with the intoxication argument because it's now deeply political, no longer about logic. Most lawmakers in these areas are feminists as are politicians wanting to win more votes from women. If only men began voting as a group on strictly male rights grounds.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 05:17 PM
1

crime statisticians do not infer anything. the definition is what it is
/r/MensRights20/03/12 04:10 AM
0

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/r3rpw/does_rape_require_penetration_is_all_unwanted/c42ug7e
/r/MensRights20/03/12 04:09 AM
0

According to the new law, a woman can rape a man or boy without penetration of them with her own vagina, without committing rape. Edit: At least, as far as gathering statistics is concerned. Because of the stupid penetration rule, and not language that includes a vagina. Google even more blatantly says it's male on female
/r/MensRights20/03/12 03:55 AM
0

they consent by chosing to live under islam
/r/MensRights20/03/12 03:42 AM
1

i meant publishing in the msm
/r/MensRights20/03/12 03:41 AM
0

i was basing the comment off media examples. maybe women don't do it too much and it's only shown in entertainment for tv
/r/MensRights19/03/12 05:43 PM
2

ok you "nailed" me. gj
/r/MensRights19/03/12 05:36 PM
-2

"He must not cause brusing or bleeding of her body." That's pretty clear that it's not intended to be harmful. You can't do much at all under the conditions set as women bruise easily due to having next to no muscles. Women certainly slap men all the time and are encouraged by the media and western culture.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 05:27 PM
-1

Muslims aren't misogynists.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 05:07 PM
1

muslims stand their ground while christians sell men out like chattel.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 05:06 PM
6

No shit, he wrote this: Government is motivated not by a desire for fairness but by a desire to take revenge on men
/r/MensRights19/03/12 05:04 PM
1

i made some assumptions, sure. but i think those assumptions were reasonable without the benefit of your explanation considering how most such advocacy ends, which i believe is most often with "less" of it.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 04:58 PM
0

you weren't very clear. usually question marks like yours are followed by lawmaking. also the age of consent is bullshit, so depends on your definition of 'child'.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 04:52 PM
1

true but otoh if you lose 75 men your tribe is weak and easily destroyed
/r/MensRights19/03/12 04:49 PM
1

Mediocre minds are mediocre because they resist thinking about opposing viewpoints. Which is what the comment is about. Maybe the fact that this went over your head is because you are bordering on this kind of mediocrity yourself?
/r/MensRights19/03/12 08:41 AM
1

Notice there are no socialists who ever speak out against feminism like this. So if you don't like him for your politics maybe you should reconsider.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 08:38 AM
0

These include perpetuating completely unrealistic expectations about sex/women's bodies/men's penis length, the potential for corruption and taking advantage of financially desperate women/men in the industry, and the danger of possibly allowing exploitation of vulnerable people like children or teens. Can't you agree that these are real problems? See this means you are anti-porn. Only mainstream, bland porn is politically acceptable to you. You like many feminists falsely advocate for being pro…
/r/MensRights19/03/12 08:30 AM
1

It's not that silly. He privately is you can tell his wife has a hand on him.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 08:27 AM
-1

You selfishly don't give a shit about anyone or their reputation or families who are affected by your stupid comment. Fuck you. You have no fucking place to tell anyone shit.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 08:25 AM
-1

Yes, false accusations happen, but it also happens that women are shamed or harassed into abandoning their accusation. I don't give a fuck about your shitty friend. False rape accusations are a huge problem and a fucking disgrace and they need to be dealt with harshly. You selfishly don't give a shit about anyone or their reputation or families who are affected by your stupid comment. Fuck you.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 08:24 AM
-1

Rubbish. Many women are raped and move on easily, while many bullied are traumatized and commit suicide. You are 100% wrong.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 08:21 AM
0

that was the point
/r/MensRights19/03/12 08:20 AM
0

he ran with Biden as VP.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 08:19 AM
1

he still is. he appointed Biden and you can tell he is radfem by his speech
/r/MensRights19/03/12 08:18 AM
1

women were not more valuable, they were just terrible at combat
/r/MensRights19/03/12 08:16 AM
2

imo men should avoid women who dress like men, until women will date men who want to dress like women. feminists can be the first to try these new relationships and prove that feminism is about equality and that they don't have traditional expectations of men.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 03:18 PM
-1

it's the medical care of his own fucking child you douche.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 03:02 PM
-1

http://men.nasa.gov/about/
/r/MensRights18/03/12 03:00 PM
0

imo pregnancy should almost fully a woman's interest, but the consequences of pregnancy should not be pushed onto men in exchange (feminists have been pushing the consequences of pregnancy onto men).
/r/MensRights18/03/12 02:59 PM
-2

Downmodded for your bullshit dismissal of false rape accusations. Not going to sneak that past me.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 02:55 PM
-11

For men's rights, not as scary as a second term of radfem Shillbama and Biden.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 02:34 PM
-2

It's a political attack by Democrats who want to use the prevalence of feminism to take some votes from Republicans. The Democrats are radical feminists.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 02:33 PM
7

she still pretends at the beginning of the video that taking the knife to a babies genitalia is no fault of the parents if they are ignorant as if they couldn't know any better.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 02:29 PM
-2

another bullshit statistic. the men were bragging.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 06:05 PM
2

read the banner again, dumbshit.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 06:04 PM
0

are you a feminist? if not then you should question why you are typing out all this.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 06:00 PM
-3

stfu
/r/MensRights17/03/12 05:58 PM
0

the latter does not affect one gender if it succeeds, so no.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 05:56 PM
1

not really. voting for shillbama is insane for an mra. he is a radical feminist. and if not him, biden is. that is cutting off your face.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 05:54 PM
-1

i have seen political activism from many feminists that is anti-male sexuality. your opinion is of no consequence when political action by feminists attempts often to restrict or control pornography
/r/MensRights17/03/12 05:49 PM
0

don't work in the fucking industry then. "degraded" is feminist propaganda, like "objectification"
/r/MensRights17/03/12 05:45 PM
1

not if it's balanced with misogyny. personally i would want more freedom than restricting both.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 05:42 PM
2

and "violence in hollywood affects how people view violence." you have no point.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 05:41 PM
0

some posters here will be religious. they will be against porn for any reason. same with a lot of feminists who dislike male sexuality.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 05:38 PM
1

other posters are calling him out as not genuine, so you can't really say that.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 05:33 PM
-1

traditionalism has worked well for thousands of years. don't be so arrogant.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 05:29 PM
1

or another account?
/r/MensRights17/03/12 05:19 PM
2

i would not care one bit. the better would be to bypass the splc and let it be discredited, while finding out who makes threats and reverse the situation. splc do not matter without the media.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 05:18 PM
2

sucks they managed to worm their way into the system so deep. need to salt them out and salt the wood.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 05:12 PM
1

pro female circumcision?
/r/MensRights17/03/12 04:54 PM
1

itt jews
/r/MensRights17/03/12 04:52 PM
6

> Societies that are misandrist...... risk in other words
/r/MensRights17/03/12 04:47 PM
3

same reason israel supporters cry anti-semite all the time.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 04:43 PM
1

misandry against men everywhere. lucky us mrm got onto this shit.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 04:41 PM
3

truly misandry.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 04:38 PM
3

disgusting woman
/r/MensRights17/03/12 04:35 PM
3

in my experience religious can show anonymous obsession with what they hate.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 04:27 PM
0

are you from SA? they don't seem to troll religious.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 04:25 PM
2

people who read this list may receive an insight. without the list they would not.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 04:21 PM
3

they could get that from feminist subreddits.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 04:06 PM
3

pussies react to limited power by attacking others. in this case SA people are limited by war on terror and other bullshit that is being manufactured by the media and government. as pussies they feel safe attacking weaker groups and people (government is too strong and scary for pussies). this is what has happened to some of anonymous when they targeted a weak group like pedophiles and basically did the work of a police state.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 04:01 PM
2

maybe somethingawful contain a lot of religious and that is why they attacked r/atheism?
/r/MensRights17/03/12 03:55 PM
2

why mens rights? why not feminist subreddits?
/r/MensRights17/03/12 03:52 PM
2

so a judgement on mrm is based on random comments now? feminists produce many hate blogs but have not been listed for decades. Why the failure to list feminism long ago? But they have the time to make a quick reaction to mens rights.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 03:49 PM
2

there are more than a few holes and double standards in this letter: denials of the intrinsically related links of the SCUM Manifesto to feminism; denials of modern day feminists and feminist groups links with SCUM Manifesto, who for example buy and review the book on Amazon; double standards where the criteria for determining mens rights to be a hate group are not used to determine feminism as a hate group.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 03:45 PM
7

the dude who wrote that is biased: feminists often cite SCUM, buy the manifesto today on amazon, use the name for their modern conferences and theatrical groups (iirc like that current day sweden one) , and DISTRIBUTED the manifesto in women's shelters. Also, in Sweden a FEMINIST POLITICAL PARTY, had leaders making misandrist statements and this was reported in a BBC or Guardian article in about 2005. Lastly, this fuckfaces investigations seem to include a few random, anonymous blogs. If that is…
/r/MensRights17/03/12 03:35 PM
-2

it's not an ad hominem fallacy to point out the 8 minute account when they are likely to be hypocrites. it was a cougar responding
/r/MensRights17/03/12 03:24 PM
0

who is making shit up? read the linked response by another poster. seriously some people need to recognize when they don't know shit
/r/MensRights17/03/12 03:22 PM
0

i would prefer it was acceptable for both, rather than unacceptable for both
/r/MensRights17/03/12 03:20 PM
-1

the bias by slpc puts them in the radfem category anyways.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 03:16 PM
1

it's simply raising awareness about misandry in the media. it would be great if writers with their screenplays and journalists did not have double standards. eg. slapping women without consequence should be written and seen as funny.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 03:14 PM
0

unlike feminists, i can take that as a complement. but only because i am right and they are wrong. see the difference between screeching and being cool with shit? A screeching, shitty world is all you'll get if feminists get away with their subversion. feminists would shit their pants over what you wrote. but an mra is cool-headed and can take free speech without batting an eye.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 03:08 PM
1

you're wrong on everything.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 03:04 PM
-1

fuck you. where have i called clockworkgirl a cunt? You manginas automatically leap to the conclusion that a female crying about something must automatically be true. WHY? EVERY FUCKING TIME. anything is bait for a feminist. free speech automatically undermines feminism
/r/MensRights17/03/12 02:56 PM
-1

so what? dismissing or ignoring it like you have done is a fucking disgrace.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 02:55 PM
0

i think it has adapted to that. but even early equality movement ignored fundamental inqualities that men were subject to, like the draft.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 02:53 PM
1

random comments are not comparable to the SCUM manifesto. Nice try asshole, you got a couple of idiots to believe your bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 02:51 PM
-2

the SCUM manifesto and other male hate was written at feminism's inception. these are random comments you are talking about that are nowhere near that level..that's it.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 11:48 PM
6

i would like to see reactions to a comic where a guy does this to his girlfriend.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 11:46 PM
6

it's rape. look up the definition.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 11:45 PM
1

men were also oppressed, in many ways more than women.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 11:40 PM
1

my opinion is more accurate than yours, which is laughable in its naked attempt to rewrite history. she attempted murder of a famous artist. nothing at all indicates it's a joke. and when it was distributed in women's shelters, you can see the intent behind its use. the absurdity of your attempts to dismiss it can be seen by those double standards. like you, i can make a stupid declaration that all criticism of mens rights is invalid due to those parts found to be objectionable are all parodies.…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 11:33 PM
2

stalking. everything a man does is stalking in the eyes of women. you can see why they want this so bad. jailing university students must be one of the goals.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 11:26 PM
2

the author was no comedian oh something else... DONT APPLY DOUBLE STANDARDS. YOU KNOW VERY WELL WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THE MRM PRODUCED A DOCUMENT LIKE THAT. SO STFU.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 11:16 PM
3

read the second part of that sentence!!!! what part of feminists discussing the eradication of men do you not understand? feminists still do this NOW. they sure don't need to stop to gain legitimacy do they? Don't ignore whole sections of a comment that are relevant to the point. Quit applying double standards.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 11:12 PM
1

feminists still wrote it. like the communist manifesto, it's seen as a founding document it's celebrated across the world today. conferences share it's name, as do feminist productions. just read amazon reviews. feminists still buy the Scum Manifesto Nice try scumbag
/r/MensRights15/03/12 11:07 PM
5

i'm not so sure. maligning mens rights seems essential to feminists. it is not a belief but a necessity to attack the mrm like this. this is definitely not the behavior of an egalitarian movement.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 11:04 PM
0

you still repeat your feminist mantras in your head despite all that appears in mens rights here. i don't get why your denialism is so necessary for you to cling to.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 10:58 PM
4

read the SCUM manifesto. that's one example.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 10:53 PM
2

no. it doesn't.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 10:52 PM
2

are you fucking serious? feminists have been attacking mens rights actively. equality was never their goal and you can see evidence of this constantly. how dare you pretend it's even a fucking choice. it's not mens rights that is the problem. it's feminism.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 10:47 PM
1

hmmm..... what's worse -being called a cunt or discussing how men need to be actively controlled or eradicated?
/r/MensRights15/03/12 10:42 PM
1

you really think the media give mens rights air time? did you see the huffington post article about the slpc?
/r/MensRights15/03/12 10:34 PM
1

zoom out for a minute. traditionalists still have thousands of years of proof plus indigeneous cultures across the world as proof. You have to understand that there is nothing saying the current way is best. there are many, many possibilities and variations for civilization that works or may work better. traditional way of life got humanity this far through extreme hardships. that's why there is no definitive 'right way' imo. traditional culture has to count for something. our current culture is…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 04:45 PM
3

the media is feminist :-\
/r/MensRights15/03/12 04:35 PM
8

OP is mistaken. Feminists will always ensure that mens rights has an image problem, since they hold the media, political and academia. Also the SLPC has not dealt with feminist hate and listed the countless examples of hate the movement has produced such as the SCUM manifesto. OP fail on two counts.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 04:18 PM
1

in my experience logic is only effective when there is what wikipedia likes to call good faith. and when it comes to feminism i would say only about 1 or 2% of people with some kind of interest or stake have 'good faith'. it's more about political ideology than what is right. hence anger is justified imo
/r/MensRights15/03/12 03:56 PM
2

what about men who want to wear make up?
/r/MensRights15/03/12 03:46 PM
0

sean connery thinks it is ok to do so. it's not as controversial as people make it out to be. feminism has simply made opinions that are not politically correct seem untouchable. i have not read it, but i'm sure that article was not as one-sided as it is made out to be.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 03:42 PM
1

australia has a real endemic feminist problem from what i've seen and read
/r/MensRights15/03/12 03:14 PM
2

i like your conclusion description. this could serve as an insight into the media and audience reactions. looks like loud, emotional arguments need to be made. this is why i really dislike it when people try to control mra speech and tone it down. but i think you should not be so quick to label something as reasonable.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 03:11 PM
1

lol i think we misread each others comments here.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:48 PM
2

SPLC is a bullshit organization. They've had decades of opportunity to list feminism when publications like SCUM are there. They have not done so. And here you are pretending this situation with SCUM and other feminist hate doesn't exist and SPLC are not biased. i don't consider jeremiahmra a troll. i would be more likely to ban those asking for others to be banned.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:44 PM
1

exactly.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:17 PM
2

i was thinking the same thing. women are far more expensive health insurance wise and men should pay less
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:17 PM
2

post the new definition here. actually someone else looked at it already
/r/MensRights15/03/12 01:37 PM
0

my comment applies only on this one point nothing else. it's only my opinion anyway
/r/MensRights15/03/12 01:29 PM
1

how many women get slapped in the entertainment industry for laughs? how about kicked in the groin? you can't say violence against men is not accepted, when it is. You will not find the same treatment for women
/r/MensRights15/03/12 01:27 PM
1

read up on the writer while you're at it. she was no comedian
/r/MensRights15/03/12 01:22 PM
3

someone here confirmed the definition for me. don't know the source
/r/MensRights15/03/12 01:20 PM
2

every man is ostracized. the laws discriminate against men. example: the new definition of rape does not include vaginal rape of men by women. So men cannot according to law be raped by a woman when she uses her sexual genitalia. And that means boys can't be statutory raped either, when the vagina is involved. This is one example of many that affect all men. Whether they choose to recognize it or live in a sexist system does not affect the reality of this anti-male sexism.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:06 AM
3

mens rights was never close to srs. srs was always antithetical in every way. you would have been more correct to compare srs to feminism subreddits.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:02 AM
7

these either move mens rights toward a feminist/srs position of controlled speech according to feminist tolerances, or attempting to force mensrights to continually prove injustices and defend statements that are accepted truths. ofc some of these maybe new mras but they are usually too skeptical to come across as that.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 06:56 AM
-14

"treating like shit" you already have to use abstractions to weasel your way into a position. but let's talk about physical assault like slapping someone in the face. i can say now that you already lost. don't spread bullshit and make denials like feminists on this again.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 06:45 AM
2

it is defintely not satire. some feminist has simply inserted bullshit into the wikipedia article. nice try asshole
/r/MensRights15/03/12 06:43 AM
-3

these 'assholes' the op and you mention is subjective for one but contribute more relevancy than many high minded types who pretend they have moral superiority. Feminists want nothing more than to silence the most vocal. Meek people like the op are unstable and easily tricked by feminists.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 06:41 AM
1

look up the scum manifesto and feminist groups around the world who use it's name. The SPLC is dead quiet on feminist hate.Hate i might add that includes discussions on eradicating men etc. So yes they are totally and utterly fucking discredited
/r/MensRights15/03/12 06:36 AM
2

Mens rights posters have already set good examples. Feminists of good faith have posted in many long discussions. You do not understand what you are up against: the ones that cry about mras being loud are the feminists who want to corral the mrm movement. Once they succeed they will then frustrate and dismiss mras, who will then be censored by mras like you, thus controlling the mrm from the inside by turning naive people like you against others. Think shit through before you contribute bad idea…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 06:30 AM
0

i disagree on being 'courteous' in some cases. lies and derision should be met with hostility. being polite also means they can be disagreeable and forget about it and ignore you.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 06:22 AM
-13

there are examples all over the media of this including films and shit like that
/r/MensRights15/03/12 06:17 AM
1

that is terrible. men can't be raped by women, huh? that is extremely sexist. misandric even. whether men have involuntary or voluntary arousal, women can rape men.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 06:01 AM
-2

no, but you may as well be a feminist
/r/MensRights15/03/12 12:32 AM
1

Are women who rape men with their vaginas included in this new definition?
/r/MensRights15/03/12 12:30 AM
1

Are women who rape men with their vaginas included in this new definition?
/r/MensRights15/03/12 12:30 AM
-4

not ones who espouse viewpoints that do not benefit mens rights.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 12:25 AM
1

how?
/r/MensRights15/03/12 12:19 AM
-2

why do you include yourself? you are a feminist as your posts here indicate
/r/MensRights15/03/12 12:16 AM
1

feminism is a disease.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 12:06 AM
2

nope
/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:55 PM
1

progressive isn't always good. the feminism we see today is fucking progressive
/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:51 PM
-1

that is rubbish. the longest incarcerations across the world are political and by order of governments
/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:47 PM
2

agree except for your attempt at shifting blame or playing down feminism.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:42 PM
2

the point of your spam is?
/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:38 PM
2

empty threats. feminists like to pretend they can so this.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:37 PM
1

Australia seems as bad as Sweden
/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:27 PM
0

Go fuck yourself. Read those comments again.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:24 PM
1

Who gives them so much money...i mean how many gullible idiots contribute to that sort of shit?
/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:22 PM
4

playing soft ball is what they want to control speech. being labeled by a feminist organization means nothing.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:18 PM
-4

and you are another example of why there are trolls in mensrights. you sound like a feminist.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:15 PM
-9

and you are another example of why there are trolls in mensrights. you sound like a feminist.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:14 PM
-1

^ feminist
/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:13 PM
4

Feminists like you presume to ignore factual misandry like SCUM while throwing the word misogyny around. That is absurd.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 01:56 PM
21

Shows you the level of feminist indoctrination going on in colleges. the truth doesn't matter
/r/MensRights10/03/12 03:15 PM
15

Feminist judicial system.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 03:11 PM
2

Maybe you can figure out how to punish feminists for their support of the oppression of men.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 03:08 PM
13

They hate reddit for it's freedom. Literally.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 03:01 PM
-4

No they are definitely feminists. "The level of hate is just too goddam high"
/r/MensRights10/03/12 03:00 PM
-7

They need to take a look at the feminist SCUM manifesto. i really hope they all read it.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 02:57 PM
6

SPLC discredited themselves. SCUM manifesto feminist groups are everywhere so feminism should be listed, not reddit mrm.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 02:56 PM
-4

Feminists are scum. who knew??? Show him the SCUM manifesto and make him think about why feminism isn't listed as a hate group.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 02:27 PM
1

Feminists hold S.C.U.M meetings everywhere. SPLC is a massive joke if feminism is not seen as a hate group.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 02:02 PM
-3

Feminists run S.C.U.M celebrations everywhere. If anything is a hate group, feminism is because of that.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 01:55 PM
-1

They're all pussies. I wouldn't worry about it.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 01:44 PM
-2

No less trash than left wing propaganda and hate, as we see in the op's post.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 04:23 AM
-2

This submission is bullshit. The classic template of feminist trying to control men's rights by making it PC. That is how men lost in the past.. by becoming PC and kowtowing to deceitful, manipulative feminists like the op.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 04:22 AM
2

Fucking judges. You should look for ways to have these female troublemakers fired.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 06:53 PM
2

This is sexual assault and rape in western countries. I only wish comedians would do the opposite now without explanation or elaboration to prove the double standard.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 08:36 AM
2

Yup.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 07:19 AM
-5

You didn't know?
/r/MensRights21/02/12 06:16 AM
-7

"Innocent until proven guity", bitch. It's a legal foundation and you are on the wrong side of it.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 06:15 AM
1

It doesn't matter. "Looking good" means they are winning at controlling you because you self-censor.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 05:08 AM
0

Yup too much to ask.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 05:05 AM
0

paranoid fantasy about the state taking children away from their parents to raise them This happens now. How is reality paranoid and fantasy now? Are you delusional yourself?
/r/MensRights21/02/12 02:36 AM
0

Just because that's how things used to be done, it doesn't mean those methods are better or more correct than what we are doing now. Doesn't mean they are worse than current revisionist, psychosocial bullshit, either. In fact thousands of years of history could be seen as a good basis. But, liverotto is wrong on the circumcision thing. Disagree with him on that, not necessarily the rest.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 02:35 AM
1

Is there an actual definition for each of these charges?
/r/MensRights20/02/12 09:51 AM
1

I fucking HATE the fucking UN before but this takes it to another level entirely. The UN HAVE to be DESTROYED. PERIOD. Also note that the UN is an arch-socialist organization.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 09:40 AM
1

Moreover it was the United States that imposed the UN resolution that a person of less than 18 years of age is to be considered a "child". ? No fucking way. ?? wtf! You are shitting me. but in most European States the age of consent is 14 years old. About the only thing they have on anyone else.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 09:25 AM
2

Why do the op? There was no point.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 06:30 AM
1

So all that must be done is to strike out the (b) part. Maybe raise it several years to 14.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 04:28 AM
4

Your shitty op proves nothing. You are years too late to try the ignorant "mens rights are whining" tactic. Years old already. What were you trying to prove? That you are an ignorant feminist apologist? You didn't need to make a post about it.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 04:05 AM
2

“A lot of men don’t know how to make themselves appealing to women,” says organizer Tomoyo Matsuda. Anyone else find this wierd? Why didn't the writer ask "Why are the women so judgmental and narrow-minded?"
/r/MensRights20/02/12 03:48 AM
1

The government should have nothing to do with it. Looks like ABCNEWS is socialist too.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 03:46 AM
1

Not frowned upon, made illegal. The 13+ age should be the age of consent.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 03:43 AM
0

^ feminist. Quit upvoting these idiots.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 03:20 AM
2

Will she be executed after the birth? If not, it's about men's rights.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 03:20 AM
-11

Africans can raise packs of children for nothing.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 03:18 AM
3

This American idea that even a 17 years old is to be considered a child is a sickness of the mind. Most western countries. Don't blame America. Blame socialism for the plague that is feminism
/r/MensRights20/02/12 03:14 AM
1

What is the difference between 13-16 year olds and anyone else? If they can sleep with 13-16 year olds they can sleep with anyone.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 03:12 AM
-5

Just sayin buddy. Fuck you for that big government bs. "We say you owe $$$$ to this bitch due to our fucked up laws and ideas. That's 20 years in prison!!" involuntary servitude.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 03:09 AM
-10

Alright I have to call it on this one, if you owe $1M in child support, I'm assuming this has been accrued over a long time, so no, he shouldn't get a passport. Passports should never be withheld for socailist reasons like this. Fuck you and your socialism.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:28 AM
2

We know you want female entitlements and pork to keep rolling unhindered so men never catch up. That much is clear.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:25 AM
0

MRAs, pick your fights well. Downvoted. Feminists often use this to trick weak mrm into limiting the men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:22 AM
2

MRAs, pick your fights well. Downvoted. Feminists often use this to trick weak mrm into limiting the men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:22 AM
-2

is this stuff written into their genes or something?! Women get so shitty about sex it's unbelievable how widespread that is. Men have to learn to do this to women /their fiance or wives while meeting with prostitutes in the background to get what they want but deprive their partners of sex. Apart from mrm, this is the only way I see that changing.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:14 AM
3

your hands off approach is good even though it can be testing at times. i was refering more to political representation in my comment.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 04:26 PM
2

Doing nothing is usually the best course.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 03:48 PM
0

Tldr?
/r/MensRights18/02/12 03:39 PM
1

People are upvoting it for 2 reasons. Either: Women aren't punished as harshly Men are punished too harshly Now when people respond to these articles maybe posters maybe they should now preface it with one of the above positions.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 06:38 AM
2

London School of Economics. Misandry incarnate.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 06:28 AM
2

Simple. Men are expendable. Women are 'precious'. The new Reddit admins are more socialist.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 06:21 AM
0

one or the other has to change, either way. either women get less because men are oppressed , or women get less because they have too much social protection.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 06:17 AM
2

i think people are caught up on this: if conservatives support men's rights more than liberals then there should be support for conservatives. makes sense.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 06:13 AM
2

Probably about the time r/trees posters made anti-other drugs posts....
/r/MensRights18/02/12 05:59 AM
2

If you believe in equality you are not a feminist. Feminists have exploited people like you for too long.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 05:58 AM
1

They can't really be libeled like men can so they can use their protected position without the kind of social bashing feminists will attempt on any male advocate.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 05:56 AM
1

When feminists argue about comparisons they always equate something drastic for the male reproductive system than the female one. Hormonal variability is not equivalent to shrinking, bitches.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 05:52 AM
-2

Traditionalism is not misogyny. Nice try, progressive.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 05:48 AM
2

Yes SA is that something awful
/r/MensRights16/02/12 01:42 PM
1

Sounds like you are a closet pedo.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 06:27 AM
0

You are making shit up.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 04:29 AM
1

And the Dost Test is bullshit too. :-)
/r/MensRights15/02/12 02:54 PM
1

It's not CP, douche.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 02:52 PM
1

If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 02:43 PM
1

And the laws of the United States.... are bullshit.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 02:31 PM
1

why would i give a shit what legal precedent anywhere is?
/r/MensRights15/02/12 02:19 PM
-2

He declares a bullshit statement and specifically qualifies it for women, excluding men usually means they are feminists. And the fact he uses the word, "batterers" proves he's well on his way to radical.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 01:46 PM
1

There is a legal precedent in Iran and dozens of other countries to execute homosexuals. Your comment is stupid and presupposes all legal decisions are correct.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 01:32 PM
1

Yes it does. Because this law "prof" is correct. It would only take one atheist to delegitimize an entire church. Same goes here.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 01:27 PM
1

Clothed children are not cp. Google and other mainstream websites link these and other images of clothed children. You called me a pedo simply for saying this and therefore by your definition the same applies to everywhere else.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 01:10 PM
1

Reading your above comments again, you are.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 09:43 AM
3

You. Seriously tho, you are. How about you define it?
/r/MensRights15/02/12 07:35 AM
3

I'm offended not really by the joke itself so much as the acceptance and celebration of "misandrist" jokes about men in the media at the same time as jokes about women are seen as "misogynist" and the person is demonized by feminists and the media over it. The dual standard against men is what is offensive.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 07:16 AM
2

Are you a feminist?
/r/MensRights15/02/12 07:11 AM
3

Actually, I take the joking thing back. Well I don't. I hope jokes are made about spaying human women by celebrities or anyone else.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 07:10 AM
2

sure i think men should be able to make sexist jokes about women, same with women. currently only women are able to it seems
/r/MensRights15/02/12 06:39 AM
1

something that would catch your attention more than "Spay and neuter your pets" Really? You don't think feminists who own the media and politics would generate more attention and screech like that stupid elevatorgate bitch? Male victims and misandry is ignored not even noticed. Stop twisting this back on the misandrist position: How do you think a male celebrity saying he can't spay human women would go down?
/r/MensRights15/02/12 06:12 AM
2

How do you think a male celebrity saying he can't spay human women would go down?
/r/MensRights15/02/12 06:08 AM
2

Record her doing this.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 06:06 AM
1

there is nothing foolish about determining if the reddit admins support shitredditsays and are part of their moderator team.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 05:43 AM
1

post his response to you below
/r/MensRights15/02/12 05:28 AM
2

Yeh, Choromakode probably also thinks that animals can give consent to humans trying to have sex with them but not children.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 05:22 AM
2

your posting history is more likely to receive a pm response in confirmation.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 04:55 AM
2

Can you get a pm from Chromakode to prove it?
/r/MensRights15/02/12 04:50 AM
1

you know why it is. the palestinians
/r/MensRights15/02/12 04:20 AM
1

Israel is a 3rd world country.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 04:15 AM
1

I'm talking about the concept of drafts across the world. On average, no standard.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:53 AM
0

It's a bit like a conservative politician who rails against gay marriage Or a liberal redditor, socialist SA poster crying about cp, while being a pedophile. Hugo is a misogynist and a sexual predator. On what basis?
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:43 AM
1

Except for one thing. All those 'standards' suddenly and conveniently disappear when they draft men. The thinnest, shortest, or starved men were expected to fight. If they had two arms and two legs they were drafted. Which shows it's all a lie anyway. 70% are still able to pick up and shoot a gun, or carry a grenade.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:39 AM
1

Except for one thing. All those 'standards' suddenly and conveniently disappear when they draft men. The thinnest, shortest, or starved men were expected to fight. If they had two arms and two legs they were drafted. Which shows it's all a lie anyway. 70% are still able to pick up and shoot a gun, or carry a grenade.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:37 AM
1

War is not about strength now, unless it's the elite.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:33 AM
1

As part of the military contract they could be early force-terminated or court-martialed. with all the means of contraception, there is no reason to become pregnant now. It's a choice.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:29 AM
4

How do you think a male celebrity saying he can't spay human women would go down?
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:23 AM
-1

Yes it is. It's not emotive, it's a fact. Would it happen to a woman? No.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:08 AM
2

I bet no one would have been screaming at the officers like that if it were a man. When it comes to arrests and 'brutality' against women police have more credibility simply because men get a lot worse than that all the time.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:08 AM
1

It's one based on bullshit. There is a difference between stealing someone's car and the age of consent.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 02:45 AM
-1

yes she is
/r/MensRights15/02/12 02:40 AM
7

So they were the age of consent and the teacher didn't supply them with drugs? That is no comparison. Downmodded.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 02:39 AM
1

And redditors, SA and SRS have no problem with this. Apparently pictures of clothed children make the Reddit Admins and other redditors shit their pants in fear.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 02:38 AM
2

And redditors, SA and SRS have no problem with this. Apparently pictures of clothed children make the Reddit Admins and other redditors shit their pants in fear.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 02:36 AM
2

No you are. You believe in an artificial, cultural line as inviolable like a religious commandment.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 02:34 AM
1

Not sure why you bother to say that if only to get a group hug from reddit. One way or the other I wouldn't be bothered by some douchebag making that accusation. Clothed children are not cp. And that is that.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 02:16 AM
1

Every father in the world wants to keep any male away from their daughter. This is part of feminism because females are 'precious' who need 'protection', even though they mature faster than boys. Let's see what the age of consent would be if 25. This is you: Age of consent! New feminist tactic! Christ, every father in the world wants to keep old dudes away from his 24 year old daughter. It's not a feminist thing, it's a parent thing.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 02:10 AM
1

You'd be wrong.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 02:07 AM
1

That pdf is totally political and rubbish considering these pictures are all over Google, and youtube has hundreds of videos of dancing girls. The context is what is being prosecuted here. Put these images in another context and no one would have said shit.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 02:02 AM
1

You are lying. I was in those subreddits and saw nothing.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 02:00 AM
1

The test was criticized by NYU Law professor Amy Adler as forcing members of the public to look at pictures of children as a pedophile would in order to determine whether they are considered inappropriate. "As everything becomes child pornography in the eyes of the law—clothed children, coy children, children in settings where children are found—perhaps children themselves become pornographic.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 01:59 AM
1

The test was criticized by NYU Law professor Amy Adler as forcing members of the public to look at pictures of children as a pedophile would in order to determine whether they are considered inappropriate. "As everything becomes child pornography in the eyes of the law—clothed children, coy children, children in settings where children are found—perhaps children themselves become pornographic.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 01:58 AM
1

You are saying that every website like Google has CP now.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 01:57 AM
3

QUOTED FOR TRUTH, not all women are like that.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 11:24 AM
-3

I joined the sub because it was being trolled. So I automatically defended it against the trolls. The trolls were forced to escalate or lose face.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 11:23 AM
-3

I read up to the first punch. No further. Should I have mentioned that? I thought you did too.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 11:22 AM
3

Most women would have a problem with a prenup imo. Stop presuming women are a certain way. They are heartless, conceited tools in roughly the same amount as men.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 11:20 AM
1

Nicely done comic. People are sensitive right now about criticism of mensrights. You picked a bad time..but it's definitely a nice comic
/r/MensRights14/02/12 11:17 AM
-5

Did you read the above comment? Read it again.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 11:14 AM
8

You can now. Feminism is indefensible when facts are put down on the table. The only front is media/political.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 11:13 AM
-7

Same reason as everyone else?
/r/MensRights14/02/12 11:10 AM
-3

Qft. Young women are attracted to older men so the feminist response to that is to make it illegal.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 11:08 AM
-6

CLOTHED CHILDREN ARE NOT CP
/r/MensRights14/02/12 11:07 AM
-4

beat the living shit out of someone for no reason. One punch is not "beat the living shit out of".
/r/MensRights14/02/12 10:46 AM
3

The media is definitely a problem.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 10:27 AM
-1

Doesn't really say what crap she was shouting at him. He was trying to drive at the time and not get killed or kill others while driving.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 10:26 AM
2

There is nothing wrong with questioning the stupidity of current age of consent laws. To think that a hard, artificial, legal line is some kind of supreme commandment from God is stupid and wrong. It's also variable between states so your point is even more stupid.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 10:14 AM
1

"women are still getting the worse deal out of it by whole." Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzt. Wrong. What made you post that?
/r/MensRights14/02/12 10:09 AM
2

However, we do need to clamp down on the asshole comments in here. No. to try to justify their misogynism. It's not necessarily misogyny. Did you see what happened recently on reddit with the admins? That's you.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 10:04 AM
1

A clone of reddit would do nicely.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 10:00 AM
0

Isn't one of the things we loathe about the feminist movement their lack of recognition and handling of misandry within their movement? Imo you might be confusing random misandrist comments with misandrist advocacy of ngos and and misandrist behavior of government officials. Feminists give a platform to misandry. All the misandrist comments in the world wouldn't matter if the core of feminist political agenda wasn't misandry, which it is.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 09:55 AM
1

We all attack feminists because the "good" feminists never call out or fight against the radicals and the man haters. This is not my reason. I would not put it this way for myself. I only do this if they have nothing to bitch about. If they have something to bitch about that is legit i have no problem with "radicals and man haters" saying what they want. "Fighting against" is seperate from them bitching about shit here and there imo.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 09:48 AM
-1

I support both types of comments. I really wish women would say this more to counter DV propaganda that targets men.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 08:42 AM
0

I support women who say this.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 08:41 AM
1

Qft. This is true.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 08:40 AM
-9

CLOTHED CHILDREN ARE NOT CP
/r/MensRights14/02/12 08:34 AM
6

And this. Piece of cancer-faking shit, was .....able to control reddit? I'm speechless.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 08:29 AM
2

And who is Chromakode? An admin?
/r/MensRights14/02/12 08:21 AM
-2

yes. it's a word. it also has multiple meanings. why would words matter when i support gay people?
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:35 AM
-4

Are you dumb?
/r/MensRights13/02/12 04:10 PM
2

ARE YOU FUCKING SHITTING ME?????? They hired an SRS person or didn't fire this shit immediately???????!! OMFG. FUCKING TOOLS. wow at their stupidity. A reddit clone can't come soon enough.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:10 PM
-1

They're always the politically correct ones that sell out your freedom for "the social or greater good". You as an individual mean nothing.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 02:50 PM
0

Not they are not. you pedo freak. Where does this come from?
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:53 AM
1

This gaze is part of male sexuality which is why radical feminists want to control it.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:06 AM
1

Do you support terrorists?
/r/MensRights13/02/12 08:30 AM
-10

that actually could have gotten the entire website shut down. No. The Supreme Court would never side with socialists and anti-freedom types. These images are found anywhere on the internet because they are legal. Period.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 08:26 AM
-9

Yes we are misogynists. Go to something awful and do the same thing. The admins here care more about public image than anything else. If you succeed in smearing reddit as misogynist on TV you may just win. Raise as much shit as possible. Recommended subreddits to help you achieve your goal r/beatingwomen r/cougars racist subreddits and others... make a list research this and make a case.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 08:23 AM
-16

No. The guy is simply more manly than you and doesn't care about being politically correct.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 08:12 AM
-3

This guy has a profile. Admins of reddit reward cunts.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 08:10 AM
-4

CLOTHED CHILDREN ARE NOT CP YOU FUCKING FAGGOT. All these 'cp' images were of clothed children that can be found anywhere on the internet. Because they were collected in one spot and because of the context "thought crime" and the shitredditsays people, the amateur admins basically caved. Freedom is not about caving to pressure.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 08:05 AM
0

most people are sloppy with comments. it's easier to write "women are", "men are"
/r/MensRights13/02/12 04:25 AM
6

He's probably been made to look a fool in a debate here on a throwaway or main account. And now he's so pathetic he needs to lash out and spread as much hate toward mensrights as possible. Maybe he thinks he will score points to female readers or coworkers. He won't. He will look like a hating, weak-minded scumbag to women.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:44 AM
1

Women can be generally homophobic. Depends where he means. Black people are homophobic too as people found out in California. I'm pretty sure he would say not all women are homophobic when asked. As he said it helps him to view that because of feminism.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:39 AM
-5

I think your anger is justified.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:33 AM
1

So sacrificing someone's free speech because a bunch of liars are smearing something's image is acceptable conduct? It perpetuates the hysterical screeching to begin with if the antagonists are liars. The the hysterical screeching will find something else and you get less and less.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:29 AM
1

He's more sensitive to criticism of feminists is probably the explanation and more concerned with a clean image.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:22 AM
0

Once you id these feminist journalists and find out what they're doing it's already much easier to deal with. Know your enemy.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:20 AM
0

I would fuck women from the age of 14 if they consented. What are you going to say about that? And to catch any kneejerk responses European countries have this age of consent.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:17 AM
0

Dw you can call women sluts if you want now and then. Women call women sluts all the time. You have nothing to worry about.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:14 AM
0

I prefer allowing everything unless it's spam. Otherwise it seems too much like feminists 'safe spaces'. The problem is mensrights posters falling for the lies and superficial reasoning. Anyone who comes here shoild be able to see that 99% of posts are nothing like what they bitch about.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:05 AM
5

He used quote marks. Which means they are accusations of misogyny only.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:03 AM
6

No fucking way. That would be emulating feminist 'safe spaces'. To act like dictating facists like them is to go down the road of socialism where only politically correct speech is allowed. Look up marxist feminism some time.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:00 AM
3

Feminists here obviously resort to and succeed at triggering these facist impulses to smear and lie about mensrights.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 02:54 AM
5

Already in mensrights you see posters supporting the comparison the OP reported on. But how dare any mra poster make comparisons that have more truth. This shit is bad, only because the people posting here are still hypersensitive to women being attacked for their bullshit and still believe women are 'more precious or delicate' than men. You can see this by the upmodding, though some of it will be due to SRS trolls up and downmodding posts.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 02:50 AM
7

Only an SRS troll or one of the radical feminists on reddit would make that comparison. They will say anything regardless. You can't stop liars from spreading lies.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 02:45 AM
1

If a woman is wearing anything that exposes her breasts there is absolutely no way she can whine at people for looking. That's outrageous, and if she did she would get shit from me.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 02:39 AM
-10

You can't call it harassment unless you call bitches who wave their tits in your face as harassment. But, yeh, I hope you are honest about your friend. My comment was only if she would wear something and then bitch if men looked. If she's not like that I'm not talking about her. But... Can you send me a pic to verify your story?
/r/MensRights12/02/12 01:14 PM
5

which one is legal?
/r/MensRights12/02/12 08:39 AM
-5

Either the woman is stupid or a feminist. In either case do whatever you want/continue.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 08:35 AM
0

On what grounds? Post in reply.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 08:31 AM
-9

I never respect women who dress this way and cry about anything. If they even remotely look egotistical or bitchy I will make a point of staring them down.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 08:24 AM
1

Editor of this publication not a mr organization
/r/MensRights12/02/12 01:45 AM
3

Bs. Men want fit women.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 12:59 AM
2

Fucking scumbags peddling hate in educational institutions.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:39 PM
1

Libertarian agenda? how is that bad?
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:36 PM
1

How about proposing this to the current editor?
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:54 PM
-2

If facts are unwelcoming that says a lot about the situation with whiners like you.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:05 PM
0

The editor in chief of the magazine is Canadian, has many socialist sentiments as seen by his past writings and remembers the start of the magazine at a cafe where they began organizing lesbian events. Why a guy would be interested in that, or remember that particular incident says to me he is an autophobic male who worships women. He is a close to a classic NY liberal who believes all the bullshit and idolizes women. The writer is simply a feminist who will sacrifice anyone and anything to main…
/r/MensRights11/02/12 07:27 AM
7

Did you ask the owners why they did this and what they think of feminists?
/r/MensRights11/02/12 06:45 AM
1

It is a men's rights issue. Men don't have rights according to the UN, neither do boys. Plus the UN is pushing feminism on other countries.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 06:43 AM
-2

They are rhetorical devices, not presented as facts. Sheesh. At least he has a point beside all that other name-calling.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 06:18 AM
1

By definition, but not by law. Give me one example of nonviolent rape. Two people have sex. The woman says nothing that confirmed consent, but cries rape afterward. Yes, I absolutely disagree. Are you against pedophiles?
/r/MensRights11/02/12 06:08 AM
1

Whenever the media say pedophile they implictly mean child molesting. So it's safe to presume that is the point of this video. Do you disagree? Btw, rape isn't always a violent act. It is currently under redefinition by feminists.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 06:03 AM
1

This sounds like the, "All Men Are Rapist" feminist videos. It's hate.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 05:57 AM
1

And the point? but rather saying that men are biologically programmed to like younger women. No shit. Isn't this obvious?
/r/MensRights11/02/12 05:50 AM
2

The video maker appears to be a black african male adopted by Dutch into a christian missionary in africa. It's another anti-fashion industry piece, using equivocation between teenagers and the word children (for pedophilia) to try and say all men are pedohiles.. even so i can't see what the point is? it seems to me an attempt by a christian exploiting feminism to control the fashion industry. it uses rubbish feminist language like "sexualization". The video maker was probably abused as a child …
/r/MensRights11/02/12 05:34 AM
-2

You said that, pointing out "a woman is not worth more than a man" is explicitly misogynistic. How? Are women worth more than a man then? That sounds like misandry from you, not misogyny from them.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 05:04 AM
-3

sounds like trolling lol
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:56 AM
-4

For a mod of a website to state "a woman is not worth more than a man" is explicitly misogynistic. You misinterpreted this. He is saying that the fucking FATHER thinks that his daughter is worth more than men and to say actually that is bullshit. Otoh, are you saying daughters are worth more than a man by being against this? As for the denigration, submission, or oppression part so what? When you have a legitimate point then that's all that matters. All the rest are just words and flavor. For a …
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:50 AM
1

yes totally. women generally do not understand male sexuality for one. they are often afraid of it. hence the creep response is so quick for them, although that is partly to do with them concealing their slutty ways to protect their image as an upright woman (ie slut shaming by other women and men).
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:47 AM
-10

What is wrong with that thread? Some name-calling, but a legitimate point. Men who have their "little princesses" can often end up supporting special punishments and anti-male laws against men. Quit reading the name-calling. Big fucking deal. Women call men pigs and dogs all the time and they are often not even feminists.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:39 AM
-8

Maybe he thinks rape of men should be legal too? Don't throw around the word misogynist unless you know his position. You are a perfect example of the people who are quick to judge and leap to conclusions about men's rights. sometimes people who giving an opinion on mensrights are feminist so they conveniently throw the slur about misogyny around. if you want to see the tactic take any israeli or jew and they will soon use the word antisemite for any criticism. this is the same.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:35 AM
-3

The word feminist means what lobbyists and lawmakers make it mean. Not what you individuals who mean nothing to anyone think it means.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:34 AM
-1

And the things I've said were not inflammatory or argumentative. Post an example from the beginning. Actually, every subreddit downvotes everyone. Men's rights isn't too bad. Try r/politics, or other large subreddits. There is nothing unique to men's rights that you have experienced so quit singling r/mensrights as if it's different from elsewhere.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:30 AM
-1

There is misogyny here Where? Post below.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:28 AM
-4

What steps can we(r/mensrights) and the Men's Rights Movement as a whole take to rectify people's incorrect impressions of us? Those incorrect impressions are made and given by feminists. Since they are opposed to men's rights, to not change anything is the correct course.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:26 AM
1

Other countries have even bigger problems and already passed this shit, or something similar to it. Without knowing your country I bet it's far worse than you think it is.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 03:39 AM
1

For what? It's poison to be around a feminist and their hatred of anything male or any perceived male advantage.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 03:35 AM
0

Huh? Where did I say only women? The only term I used was feminist, which includes men and women. Sorry but I have a job and I doubt anyone I know has the time to Hence SOPA, NDAA, PATRIOT ACT etc. I wouldn't suggest protesting but instead changing your vote and trying to get others to do the same, for the same reasons.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 03:29 AM
1

Lol. You are like a lump of wet coal, bitch. I'll keep scouting for sparkling diamonds while dirty, little haters like you whine at men who can't be controlled by women. I can do whatever I want. Most people are coal, like you. There is nothing interesting in coal except as fuel for use by others. I'll burn that fuel to power a sex bot anytime.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 03:26 AM
1

child sex bots would reduce child abuses. anyone against them supports real children being the outlet.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 03:14 AM
1

You're the only creep, bitch. Male sexuality is not creepy in any shape or form.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 03:04 AM
1

Even if it is other intimacy, so what.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 03:03 AM
2

There are plenty of them who seem to think that replacing a girlfriend with a doll is the greatest idea ever. Why are you against that? It's none of your fucking business. It doesn't matter what type of intimacy men get from these sex bots. Women don't provide it now, so a sex bot can provide more. And besides you already admitted to using artificial male dicks in as a replacement of a male partner so you are not credible at all anyway..you are completely 100% hypocritical bitch.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 03:02 AM
2

The funny thing is, these are almost certainly people who don't actually have sex with women. Hence why they're so quick to defend these bots and blame feminists for all of their sexlessness. We have or have had sex with women. It's often extremely overrated. And when you combine that with feminism there is literally no appeal. Sorry to prove you a judgmental, sexist idiot, but that's what you are.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:59 AM
0

Feminist lobbyists prove otherwise and have restricted what is acceptable porn in many countries. You are wrong about you friend feminists. They are irrelevant. The movement and lobbying matters, not individual nobodies who you are friends with who watch laws pass against pornography by feminists and do or say nothing to stop/change that.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:56 AM
1

No.That's not what I said. But in the context of sexual stimulation, you can see that what i said is true.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:54 AM
0

As I said, it's not rape from some perspectives. Many women met their partners this way in the past and stayed married longer than progressive, whining feminists couples. For decades and probably never seperated once in their lives. Those women who need this are probably single and wonder what they are doing wrong. Nothing. Feminism fucked with them and demonized traditional women.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:49 AM
-1

That is the style of these quotes. They are truisms and are generalist by nature. They are not literal, but parables. The first one is true more than not. How many times in the media have you heard a writer saying how disgusting women are for not putting the seat up for men? Whereas I can say I have heard women blame men and insult them for leaving the seat up more than once.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:43 AM
2

so? the truth is always unwelcome to sheep
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:35 AM
1

Society at large, including judges and police officers, must be educated to change the social attitudes and beliefs that encourage male violence. "judges and police officers must be educated"................ in feminism and misandry. it's all here. this disgusting, sexist agenda against men is at the international, multinational level.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 04:16 PM
1

What's also sad is all the taxpayer money and government time wasted on this bullshit. Only to create more of it that costs more time and money.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 03:42 PM
1

No it's not creepy. What is creepy is your need to call it that. In every post. Are you jealous of a sex bot?
/r/MensRights10/02/12 03:34 PM
1

Here you go. Automatic "creepy" card to protect female sexual control. Doesn't work anymore, bitches.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 03:34 PM
1

men may say it but women still think it. maybe if you were female you would hear female comments.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 03:31 PM
1

?
/r/MensRights10/02/12 03:28 PM
1

there is no difference. women are very emotionally attached to their replacement penises.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 03:27 PM
7

There are no ethical implications at all. Flat out none. Ethicists like to control people and are usually anti-freedom.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 03:00 PM
-9

The reality of a feminist society. Men can't rape women any more....some women would actually be cool with it if it was light 'rape' where she does nothing and the dude comes in and does her and she resists without consenting but then begins to react excitedly and melts and falls in love forever. without consenting. that shit doesn't happen anymore because the government is involved now and due to feminists. no guy is going to do that. those romance novels are completely dead, thanks to feminism…
/r/MensRights10/02/12 02:50 PM
-6

^ From Shitredditsays. This little douche is a marxist feminist. Do not upvote.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 02:32 PM
1

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA WHAAAAAT!? A bot can't answer back and say no is a reason to ban them? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU SMOKING YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT? ARE YOU A FUCKING MARXIST FEMINIST NOW?
/r/MensRights10/02/12 02:28 PM
0

^ Radical feminist. They are looking to replace a male penis. Dildos eliminate the need for a male partner.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 02:26 PM
0

IIRC, the article said twice after she already refused. You don't. He asked twice. Yes, and it is inappropriate for a boss (whether male or female) to ask out a subordinate This was a subordinate (a dr) asking a superior (a dean of medicine). This reversal while the subject is the article i linked is irritating. I thought they went a bit overboard with the result A "bit"? Are you kidding me!? people flirt and date all the time at workplaces. Objectification doesn't have to apply to incidents inv…
/r/MensRights10/02/12 02:18 PM
1

Just because I Your post reeks of feminism for other reasons. In the case you posted repeatedly? Or twice. men and women meet at work all the time. even sitcoms promote it. you have an extremely intolerant (feminist) viewpoint. would be considered inappropriate Did you see result of these two questions? The reaction was so much more than "being regarded as inappropriate". objectification "Objectification" is a feminist construction that is misandrist. The fact you are even entertaining this soph…
/r/MensRights10/02/12 01:42 PM
-6

^ Radical feminist Why is this douchebag being upvoted? This disgusting rant about objectification (an invented feminist word to attack male sexuality) is misandry.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 01:31 PM
1

Those women are free to leave. Quit buying into this crap. Apparently it all started in 1993 Until that point, most Governments tended to regard violence against women largely as a private matter between individuals, and not as a pervasive human rights problem requiring State intervention. Socialism started it.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 12:42 PM
0

Maybe. It's not unbelievable that feminists don't care about true raped women, but only care about exploiting them for the chardonnay rape false rape stories.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 11:01 AM
1

you don't need statistics when RAPE IS BEING REDEFINED AS REGRETFUL SEX. Seriously picture a violent rape. Now picture these sleazy elevatorgate bitches crying about comments and consent while sex is underway, after getting themselves drunk and agreeing to sex. Or fucking "surprise sex" like in Sweden.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 10:58 AM
-1

Ok look at this exchange. This is how they are encouraged. The scumbags polluting the thread with spam comments and having mensrights posters downvoted in their own fucking subreddit. Second part of exchange +60
/r/MensRights10/02/12 10:41 AM
0

Your post history does not mean shit when you say stupid crap that supports the feminist trolls in r/mensrights. Like bashing 4chan condescendingly on a great sub like this. You are identical to a 2XC poster. if you hate 4chan just say it flat out.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 10:36 AM
1

Yes they do. Feminists have all kinds of expectations of men. Are you a feminist?
/r/MensRights10/02/12 10:34 AM
-1

Either that or a cunt. 4chan is 10x more intelligent than the average redditor, so bashing it doesn't make sense. Plus, if 4chan appreciate mensrights, by bashing it you are doing a feminist's work unwittingly.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 10:27 AM
0

^ Feminist and dumbass. Barbara Kay: In Canada, asking for a date can bring a harassment claim Elevatorgate I shouldn't have had to fucking post this, faggot.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 10:23 AM
3

Point out where.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 10:18 AM
-6

And this is where the bullshit starts. Are you a feminist? Wait...2XChromosome poster. Do not upvote. edit: Why are you faggots upvoting this? Have you not been reading mensrights at all???
/r/MensRights10/02/12 08:25 AM
7

The fact they bed porn star-looking robots... not good; not a men's rights cause. Yeh it is. Wait for it: It is male sexual empowerment. we're advocating replacing real relationships with sex robots If women aren't stepping up to the plate and either ignoring or toying with men by flirting etc it's not a real relationship. Oppressing men or male sexuality in any way is unacceptable. It is extremely socialist to believe in forcing men into relationships that you or society conceives of. It's real…
/r/MensRights10/02/12 07:03 AM
2

I think it's more about whining, emotionally abusive, unappreciative, false rape crying bitches who believe in feminism are simply not worth the trouble. fta “I hate the process of dating,” he said.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 06:39 AM
8

they have no case since women objectify men with dildos. it won't fly imo. maybe in a feminist state it would..still, W T F is wrong with Canada. They are like Sweden and produce a fucking LOT of anti-male hate.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 06:28 AM
10

Trying to shame men for this is Feminism 101. It won't work though.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 05:36 AM
3

I really want one of these. Then you can use desperate older women/feminists for children while keeping the doll as the main deal. HTFU Japanese geniuses
/r/MensRights10/02/12 05:35 AM
5

The law was written with an anti-male agenda.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 05:32 AM
4

What about the judicial system, which made the original recommendation? FTA: "The Law Reform Commission had recommended the change to prevent unreasonable murder convictions of women who killed after years of domestic violence or abuse, but who had not faced an immediate threat to their lives." This law was specifically designed to allow women to murder men who abused them over years and get lighter sentences. It encourages women to murder men. Are Australian men who are subject to years of dome…
/r/MensRights10/02/12 05:30 AM
4

why don't french men do the same? there must be french men out there with the classic 'frigid' wife
/r/MensRights09/02/12 09:59 AM
-6

It is while the current system exists, dumbasses. You could go on for decades with white-knighting and not change a thing. Obtaining equality by abusing the same system is better than maintaining the stupidity of rewarding feminists.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 09:57 AM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pgsmw/over_the_past_ten_years_261491_men_and_boys_have/c3pf9ck
/r/MensRights09/02/12 09:52 AM
1

There have been many wars since. You don't spike a sample with an outlier like major world wars.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 09:51 AM
1

good point. most women 'suicide' for attention, not quite enough to kill themselves which they could do easily.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 09:49 AM
0

really this hard? really?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 04:21 PM
-1

How is that "misinformation about male victim rates"?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 04:08 PM
-1

This kind of writing is published by feminists everywhere and people like you aren't laughing at it.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 03:49 PM
-1

women are homophobes against men. they call a guy gay if he is 'different' or won't approach them, as a way to boost their self esteem. what they don't realize is they make zero effort to initiate...many women have been let down by feminism from good relationships. feminism is poison, literally.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:54 PM
0

now if only more "feminists" supported men's rights..and advocated for men's rights...
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:52 PM
1

Yes I agree. I can't agree more.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:45 PM
1

I agree. I'm only hedging against feminists including all that as violence. I've read they are trying to claim emotional abuse etc. It will be needed if they continue succeeding with introducing anti-male laws.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:42 PM
1

An example?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:40 PM
-1

It's a rhetorical argument, as per all philosophical arguments. Your own comment doesn't acknowledge the constraints of written communication like this. Do you want a million words to carefully qualify every statement? Should I laugh at your comment, too, to ridicule it?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:38 PM
1

But it could, as per dictionary definition of violence: 1. Physical force exerted for the purpose of violating, damaging, or abusing: crimes of violence. 2. The act or an instance of violent action or behavior. 3. Intensity or severity, as in natural phenomena; untamed force: the violence of a tornado. 4. Abusive or unjust exercise of power. 5. Abuse or injury to meaning, content, or intent: do violence to a text. 6. Vehemence of feeling or expression; fervor. the exercise or an instance of phys…
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:35 PM
1

That's why I said "could", rather than "is".
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:29 PM
2

Rape is good if you want to make an argument about this. It promotes the winner spreading his successful genes in the weaker. Do you think raping women is good?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:27 PM
-1

I'm talking about gossip libel etc. That is an attack on a man's reputation with lies behind his back.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:25 PM
-1

Try this before you type a random comment next time
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:21 PM
-1

A lot of a woman's natural tactic is to gossip and create evil smears against others. You could call it social violence. It is evident from your examples.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:19 PM
1

It's politically incorrect to promote violence. Violence is useful, like in revolutions. Pacifism didn't help jewish people in ww2 from surviving. Pacificism is actually the most unnatural position imo. If you are attacked, defending oneself from an aggressor is totally appropriate.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 11:27 AM
1

What does rape have to do with erections?
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:07 AM
0

Until this is changed I support accused women being subject to the same treatment as men.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:06 AM
0

Sure, sure. Next you'll be saying women like nice guys and feminism is about equality. There is an expectation and guys will recieve a sting of some kind if they do not offer to pay. You do not date women as a man.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 03:30 AM
0

The majority of women in the dating pool expect something like this. In any western country. Your anecdotal experiences are worthless even in New Zealand. Women will not express this to a guy especially someone as gullible as yourself. You will get a silent black point and most fools will never know
/r/MensRights30/01/12 03:13 AM
2

Any western country. Take your pick.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 02:57 AM
-1

It's true. Feminism has ruined many men.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 02:51 AM
1

Why not?
/r/MensRights30/01/12 02:42 AM
0

Really? American? Tell me of one western country that allows topless women everywhere and with a bigger porn industry.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 02:40 AM
4

That comic is so misrepresentative. Shows you feminists are not listening to the problem.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 02:36 AM
2

That is ineffective against someone who has read up on men's rights.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 09:01 AM
-2

14 should be the worldwide age of consent.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 08:14 AM
-1

I think 14 is reasobable
/r/MensRights22/01/12 08:10 AM
8

It is about men's rights. Women are using New yorker dudes as free cash machines because of the perception that men fit into roles. This creates a standard of social behavior based on sexist attitudes against males. This type of thinking translates into any politically involved woman in the area exploiting similar attitudes, like "I got nearly raped and will cry rape", or "that creep in my workplace needs to be fired because of my sexist attitudes"..
/r/MensRights20/01/12 03:19 AM
-8

that's not proof it's false. radical feminists will be trying to teach young girls to cry rape as frequently as possible.
/r/MensRights18/01/12 07:22 AM
0

It's not far fetched at all. It's actually insightful and true. Being rejected by a guy is social death for a woman. By crying rape she is so desirable she needs sympathy instead of ridicule.
/r/MensRights18/01/12 07:20 AM
-2

You fucked up and should have closed the door and/or moved on. You can't come to any woman's aid anymore and you shouldn't anyway if they are feminists.
/r/MensRights18/01/12 07:14 AM
-6

if that were true they would be cloning their beautiful fuckable women.
/r/MensRights18/01/12 06:52 AM
-2

there have been lots of submissions that are similar.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 10:40 AM
-1

there is no reputation problem
/r/MensRights13/01/12 09:36 AM
-1

quit being politically correct. it leads inevitably to feminism and their control mentality.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 09:36 AM
-7

children today are used as weapons against men and male sexual freedom.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 09:33 AM
1

I've taken a look in r/australia with the avoiceformen submissions and the posters there are downmodding the articles to 0 at least. I would equate the average reaction to approximately an srs poster. The only explanation i can come up with is that r/australia itself is stacked with socialist-feminist posters, all of whom demonstrate extreme hostility to the idea of mrm.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 12:53 PM
6

"could"
/r/MensRights08/01/12 01:54 PM
5

The gender is relevant because there is a sadistic taint to the teacher's behavior that suggest it could be motivated by misandry. What about offering a hand or shoulder as a crutch?
/r/MensRights08/01/12 11:04 AM
3

Qualified men are being rejected for positions in favor of less qualified women. In positions where qualifications count. duh?
/r/MensRights08/01/12 10:58 AM
1

Exactly. If all the best people are women, I would support a full female board. As long as they were not feminists.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 10:55 AM
0

Sounds like you will still be paying for this through taxation and increases in taxation
/r/MensRights08/01/12 10:55 AM
0

religion is a big proponent of circumcision, as donkey_schlong says
/r/MensRights08/01/12 10:50 AM
0

This means nothing. There are feminists at all levels in the judiciary across the world for some reason.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 10:49 AM
0

Sounds exactly like 1984....
/r/MensRights08/01/12 10:45 AM
1

Don't forget all the men in poverty. I doubt they would be able to vote, let alone read.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 10:34 AM
1

Many women would have voted by proxy through their husbands. Many husbands would take into account or change their vote for their wife.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 10:33 AM
0

r/australia is trying to keep this buried in their subreddit.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 02:58 PM
4

Wikipedia is very corrupt because of their editors. No one should donate to their survival. Even though the premise is good, the editors are too political and corrupt.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 02:23 PM
1

I feel so bad for these feminists seeing men as oppressors everywhere they go.....wait no i don't X-D
/r/MensRights07/01/12 02:17 PM
0

I bet it's quietly dropped because it's a woman.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 10:40 AM
1

That's because you are dumb.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 10:34 AM
4

The best position is to be reasonable pro-choice because women now have ample opportunity to do it early and there is early detection available now.
/r/MensRights01/01/12 07:39 AM
-1

It's 2 bodies
/r/MensRights01/01/12 01:18 AM
-2

So i can kill a newborn? The only difference is the location.
/r/MensRights01/01/12 01:16 AM
-2

It is state-sanctioned murder.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 03:35 PM
2

"yes"
/r/MensRights31/12/11 03:28 PM
-10

I think their problem is that they wanted their dads to fuck them, but were rejected.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 09:06 AM
7

Attempted murderer, also it would be a hate crime, held up as a feminist role model.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 09:04 AM
2

everywhere not in the navy
/r/MensRights31/12/11 04:18 AM
1

Because it moves the problem elsewhere.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 03:35 AM
3

A lot of men sell out and punish other men. This is one of the fundamental reasons why feminism has advanced like it has. You see it in the media all the time.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 03:34 AM
1

it does make a right while a certain system is being implemented like feminism.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 03:31 AM
1

Discrimination cannot be effectively countered through legal means - it's a cultural problem first and foremost. Feminists effectively utilize legal means all over the world. You are wrong.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 02:29 AM
1

It will be covered with gazillions of blood stains instead.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 02:28 AM
-2

I have no problem with such comments. 15 year olds can be fucking hot. Just because some laws in some states and countries say a 15 year old is off limits does not mean that is a justifiable law. Hard lines on this are bullshit and this is what free speech is all about. What's next you can't make jokes about 9/11 or disabled people? This oversensitivity is completely bullshit. The reactive trolls who take offense at it are the fucking freaks here yet they are patronized for their bullshit everyw…
/r/MensRights29/12/11 01:53 AM
-1

There are enough feminists screaming misogynist at men's rights already. The same thing would happen even if you had your "safe space" to receive "positive experiences" in.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 06:06 PM
-1

Feminists fire blanks
/r/MensRights28/12/11 05:59 PM
-7

It's not the first time I've had a negative experience in the rest of Reddit from a member here. Q FUCKING Q. QUIT FUCKING CRYING. YOU DO NOT LIVE IN HEAVEN OR ANY UTOPIA SO YOU ARE GOING TO GET NEGATIVE EXPERIENCES. YOU ARE NOT GUARANTEED POSITIVE EXPERIENCES WHEN YOU ARE BORN.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 05:46 PM
0

i don't care how men want to interact with women. I care about actual power and law. And feminists have been cultivated and ushered into both positions by men through either misguidance or misandry. When feminists can wield law against masuclinity, or men, I have a massive problem because it's misandry.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 05:42 PM
2

why should i continue if you prejudge all of r/mensrights based on one poster in another subreddit? and a post which indicated nothing of what you concluded.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 05:38 PM
-11

It led me to form the same negative opinion of this subreddit as I have for TwoX or SRS. Then you are extremely stupid and typically shallow. You do not deserve any response.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 05:29 PM
0

There are laws that specifically target men as a gender. There is discrimination in court sentencing and military drafts that affect all men. You are under-representing the true reality of misandry in society.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 05:25 PM
0

Downmodded for using the term misogynist in the title. Try resubmit without utilizing that stupid, exploited word.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 05:23 PM
1

No. You are fucked up. Totally.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 05:21 PM
-4

You should review the effect of feminist lawmakers and judicial activists before you make any further comment about men's rights.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 05:06 PM
-1

unfortunately feminism has recruited many men against the majority of men. many of these men are in politics, the judicial system, law enforcement, etc. hence the bullshit that this bitch rants, matters. a lot.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 05:01 PM
-5

Fuck off and die. You should review the effect of feminist lawmakers and judicial activists before you make any further comment about men's rights.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 04:58 PM
-4

Anger is necessary, dickwad.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 04:57 PM
-3

Sorry but the OP is wrong on that. You can't do much if someone wants to slander your cause. You people posting support of this stupid bitch are enabling this slander by taking it seriously.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 04:54 PM
1

Tell her she is not worth the trouble and to fuck off.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 04:33 PM
-12

IIRC, This is the same bitch who was 'raped' by being asked a question in an elevator at a computer geeks conference, then tried to raise hell about it everywhere and attacked everyone for being misogynists, much like the idiots trying to attack r/mensrights all the time. You can see the post relating to this in her writer archive on this site. Here she is at it again and this time trying to 'bring down' reddit and it's userbase by using the shaming technique that is effective against 'pacified'…
/r/MensRights28/12/11 04:27 PM
1

I initially seemed to downplay these women and said why not do what they want. You correctly checked me on that. There was then some back and forth between us about raping, killing etc. I then went back on my initial attitude of downplaying it and said these women actually do have political goals. I stated that in the event you may have thought i was still dismissive. I kinda changed my mind.
/r/MensRights23/12/11 02:45 PM
0

Nice work upmod
/r/MensRights23/12/11 02:18 PM
1

don't get me too wrong about these groups..they definitely have a political agenda and political connections
/r/MensRights22/12/11 04:01 PM
2

recent history seems to support my opinion
/r/MensRights22/12/11 03:58 PM
1

yes really. watch out for it and investigate it next time
/r/MensRights22/12/11 03:56 PM
1

rape is a lesser crime than murder. still your style your call
/r/MensRights22/12/11 03:49 PM
1

some good faith on your part would go a long way. your interpretation is too literal
/r/MensRights22/12/11 03:48 PM
1

Quit slandering Annarchist
/r/MensRights22/12/11 03:45 PM
3

aggression is good, not bad. passivity has failed men..feminists have simply taken advantage of it
/r/MensRights22/12/11 03:42 PM
2

those other parts are feminists bleating to their herds. they are loud and should be ignored or countered
/r/MensRights22/12/11 03:41 PM
1

qft
/r/MensRights22/12/11 03:38 PM
1

agreed
/r/MensRights22/12/11 03:32 PM
1

qft
/r/MensRights22/12/11 03:32 PM
1

as long as they're prepared to be raped or killed in return.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 03:31 PM
1

i think it's healthy for women to work toward something they want. i don't support widespread feminism in law though.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 03:10 PM
1

you have low self esteem
/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:53 PM
3

So you would support men that sought to decriminalize rape of women to show them their place?
/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:43 PM
5

to me, whether or not circumcision is good or bad is irrelevant to this debate. it's relevant because authorities use, "it's good" to keep it legal.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:37 PM
1

can you post in r/gonewild?
/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:31 PM
3

It would also be "economical" to harvest people's organs without consent after they die, wouldn't it?
/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:30 PM
3

You are too stupid to be a good medical student.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:25 PM
4

So you admit society is feminist? You agree with the need for a men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:23 PM
5

The clitoris is worthless. It's only real value is for cosmetics and science. Would you rather they hurt some defenseless animal? Anyway it isn't like they're circumcising baby boys so I don't see what the problem could be.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:17 PM
6

You sound like you hate men.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:16 PM
3

Just goes to show you women can't be stopped... Feminists can be stopped.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:08 PM
2

She has been indoctrinated with feminism by feminists and is merely regurgitating what she has been told. Mras don't have a purpose to shame sluts. If women want to be sluts that's fine with me. This is an extremely misleading video and reminds me of 13yo christian evangelists.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:04 PM
1

Men can only do so much trying to defend by making tiny cuts here and there. Men have to somehow find a means to hamstring the government then cut it's throat when it falls rather than inflict these scratches.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 04:13 PM
2

It seems to be all part of a drive to lower and attack men at all levels. Anything male has to be lowered below female and exploited and used for government or female gain. I think the UK is trying to catch up to Sweden.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 04:11 PM
1

look in my reply to the linked quote. i quoted both together and linked the second.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 03:44 PM
1

because it was posted, some redditors reported it to authorities. you are wrong.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 03:44 PM
1

there's probably a lot of other shit they are groomed to do
/r/MensRights21/12/11 09:59 AM
1

But last night one of her supporters, MP John Hemming, said: ‘This is a ridiculously harsh sentence for what was a minor technical breach of a court order.’ He added that it was ‘a waste of taxpayers’ money’ and an attempt to silence a mother who had disagreed with the family law courts. And look at who steps into to try and get women off. A "Liberal Democrat" politician. This guy should be ejected from the Liberal Democrats.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 09:31 AM
3

and people in r/trees are probably breaking drug laws and sharing drugs. what's your point?
/r/MensRights21/12/11 07:12 AM
2

That has a good ring to it for mrm purposes: "Male targeted eugenices project". Which it is.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 06:43 AM
1

Why should a donor be responsible?
/r/MensRights21/12/11 06:39 AM
1

that's what i meant. i changed the post
/r/MensRights21/12/11 06:33 AM
1

So feminism by your own admission is about benefitting women's only?
/r/MensRights21/12/11 06:32 AM
1

hedonism is great for men. it was economics
/r/MensRights21/12/11 06:27 AM
1

upmodded.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 06:26 AM
2

no he's saying they should be lower. why respond to his comment like a feminist?
/r/MensRights21/12/11 06:26 AM
0

qft. this shit has to be changed everywhere. a major source being britain
/r/MensRights21/12/11 06:25 AM
2

yes. nearly every policy that is anti-freedom is because of a child or woman who is presented as a victim.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 06:24 AM
1

Dude is legitimately angry. You are all validating, by mistake, the idiots who called him on his language. Legitimate anger is legitimate. You are already being controlled by the politically correct.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 06:07 AM
0

The truth is in the judicial record. Grass is green too. There is a record of it outside.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 06:06 AM
0

Yes it is true.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 06:00 AM
1

Judges are feminists so I'm not surprised.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:39 AM
1

so she gets the same thing done to her. you think she should get exception because she's a woman?
/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:22 AM
2

For instance, Valentine's Day and Christmas are recognized as gift giving holidays, therefore, a ring offered in form of a Christmas present will become the personal property of the recipient in the event of a break up. I can't see how that would change a conditional 'gift' like an engagement ring.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 04:21 AM
5

but the second it happens to a woman on video, the world loses its shit. feminist media, feminist editors. exactly like feminist judges handing out lower sentences for female criminals
/r/MensRights21/12/11 03:14 AM
2

A counter to this would be awesome. A fund to elect pro-male men (and women i guess) to government.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 03:12 AM
1

Every Democrat must put money into them.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 03:10 AM
1

Britain is an extremely feminist and misandrist society. Manginas are at all levels of government and media. Seriously if this bitch was doing this in front of the guy I would tear her shirt off then punch her in the face and kicked her to the curb outside of the bus.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 02:58 AM
1

I think a drunk dude has to do this to a girl on a bus. Anyway stupid kid should have beaten the crap out of her.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 02:54 AM
0

i agree with thepigman.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 02:41 AM
1

what about the part where a piece of a child's body is taken away from them without their knowledge or ability to oppose? ain't that enough? or are male babies just objects?
/r/MensRights19/12/11 08:08 AM
4

They are different in that one happens to a male and one to a female.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 08:05 AM
4

it's both or neither. could be that female circumcision is part of some religion (islam?). judaism (male), islam (female)?
/r/MensRights19/12/11 07:41 AM
-1

well i think a radfem supporting the rape of all feminists as a solution is kinda cool. it's almost like it's a rape fantasy...but yeh, spam.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 07:37 AM
2

thx for the tip
/r/MensRights19/12/11 07:35 AM
5

You think this is hypocrisy? Does not support female circumcision being legal. It's sexist.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 07:30 AM
-5

must be that video lol
/r/MensRights19/12/11 07:29 AM
3

The judicial system is feminist. Interesting how many judges are actually this corrupt and how widespread the problem is amongst the judicial class.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 07:27 AM
-1

it's an opinion. even radical feminists are entitled to express an opinion. i don't think spam however is worth allowing.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 07:03 AM
1

imo he'd change his mind if he read mensrights and was alive to do it
/r/MensRights19/12/11 07:00 AM
2

ok for spamming i can see value but not for expressing an opinion itself which is disagreeable.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 06:58 AM
-7

Well you are an extreme hypocrite and i hope to see the day when jews across the world get imprisoned for child cruelty or abuse for doing the procedure. Go fuck yourself. It's a very simple concept that you should be able to figure out why.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 06:57 AM
2

why ban? surely downvote is enough? it's an opinion
/r/MensRights19/12/11 06:54 AM
-3

then you have to be ok with female circumcision. both or neither, scumbag
/r/MensRights19/12/11 06:54 AM
4

you shouldn't have to watch a video to agree, but at least you came round
/r/MensRights19/12/11 06:52 AM
0

manginas who pull that shit would never succeed if I witnessed it. A beatdown to any mangina who attacks a dude defending himself should be coming. A true beatdown. I'm talking broken teeth, broken bones to any mangina who defends a bitch who assaults a man.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 06:51 AM
0

good video. not sure why it's being downmodded
/r/MensRights19/12/11 06:38 AM
-1

You should never call (or help) the cops and police unions everywhere should be destroyed as soon as possible.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 06:31 AM
2

that's a nice way of putting it. and apparently it's a model for all western countries
/r/MensRights19/12/11 06:27 AM
10

go fuck yourself. next time when you have complications you can sit there and do it instead.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 06:23 AM
1

what you say is female friendly is anti-male because of opposing taste. it's also presumes too much about women
/r/MensRights19/12/11 05:49 AM
0

So you what to make the games off-putting to men instead? Fuck you.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 12:47 AM
1

I disagree. They are extremely attractive.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 12:46 AM
0

no you don't get it. you are trying to apply female sexual tastes to male tastes WHICH ARE PERFECTLY NORMAL AND 200% JUSTIFIABLE. How many women play male chars? barely any. How many women undress their male chars at any opportunity? none. Answer is straight men like women. Don't offend the dignity of men by questioning their sexual tastes
/r/MensRights19/12/11 12:45 AM
0

well said
/r/MensRights19/12/11 12:41 AM
0

you missed the point totally and on testosterone you ignored it. men compete with each other at the same level even when they have obviously different testosterone levels. That's not 'fair' but men do it. women should not get a free ride because of their hormonal differences, when men don't. On the height thing, same point. Short men have unnattainable 'height' and still compete at the same level with those who have it. They don't get a special privelege like women to compete in a different segr…
/r/MensRights19/12/11 12:24 AM
-1

they play casual games like cards and flash games. MISLEADING STUDY
/r/MensRights19/12/11 12:16 AM
-2

Ain't that something then? You have to behave like a psycho for any semblance of reality to penetrate the feminist worldview being created by idiots like you. You do not understand economics. That is not the way it works. Anyone is free to try. And fail. Hey wouldn't it be great to start a multi-million $$ company selling dolls and knitting needles to men? No it wouldn't, it would be stupid so laughable you would die laughing to even pretend that it might work. So why are articles like the above…
/r/MensRights18/12/11 05:59 PM
0

Kotaku needs to be razed
/r/MensRights18/12/11 05:46 PM
5

at some level it's stupidity. or gullibility perhaps
/r/MensRights18/12/11 05:45 PM
-2

NO SHIT. MORE MEN ARE GAMERS AND PAY FOR GAMES YOU STUPID TWAT. IT'S CALLED ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS. HERE'S AN IDEA. YOU SELL A PRODUCT TO NONEXISTENT DEMOGRAPHIC. TRY IT SOMETIME YOU FUCKING IDIOTS. FUCK KOTAKU
/r/MensRights18/12/11 05:39 PM
-2

dumb bitch
/r/MensRights18/12/11 05:38 PM
2

you can submit old articles. users upmodded it
/r/MensRights18/12/11 11:20 AM
1

you can change the rules from the top (politically). also, rather than responding to female flirtation, get them fired with sexual harassment. nice-looking guys who attract female flirtation have to start getting women fired at work rather than sacking her.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 11:15 AM
1

no that part is wrong. i'm smart. maybe an asshole to feminists especially but not really to men whom i hope to achieve true equality which you've just gotten a taste of with my response above. i have no problem with the "asshole" label when used by a feminist. but i'm no moron
/r/MensRights18/12/11 11:01 AM
2

breaking conventional social norms that women follow. explanation: women have destroyed the meaning of conventional cues by flirting to provoke jealousy or simply get attention. conventional social signals (cues) mean: i'm not really interested and will embarrass you if you try anything so don't bother.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 10:53 AM
0

Yes you are. You are a lying piece of decietful conceited shit.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 10:45 AM
5

yes
/r/MensRights18/12/11 10:44 AM
1

I have no words.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 10:42 AM
1

Those "errors" are called guessing. In the absence of evidence of good cues.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 10:42 AM
1

Not it hasn't been hijacked. You are totally wrong and trying to smear the MRM.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 10:40 AM
3

You'll never progress as long as you're seen as a hate group. This is rubbish. It will progress no matter what it is perceived as.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 10:38 AM
2

The word "patriarchy" is bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 10:35 AM
1

So what? Some men produce less testosterone than other men. All men are not equal, so your excuses can go fuck themselves totally. Short men have to compete with basketball giants.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 10:29 AM
1

he did. repeating ellipsis
/r/MensRights18/12/11 10:24 AM
2

This shit has to fucking change.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 10:23 AM
2

Well I for one is pleased that someone took the common myth that men are not receptive to female mating signals and verified it. You are still assuming that the cues were readable by men and not obscure bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 10:02 AM
2

Men often have difficulty accurately reading a woman's level of interest in them, a new study finds. First line. Maybe it's because their cues are in fact, bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 10:01 AM
1

Can you not concede that there are people who leave a town to fight and DIE and there are people left inside a town who might not DIE - but might suffer in some sort of manner? Is that just TOO controversial a statement? Is it super loaded to say inside the town which is primarily full of adult women that they will be the ones inside of the town who are experiencing the side-effects of the war? That's not what was said at all by Hillary. Men are victims of war for these reasons: like women, they…
/r/MensRights18/12/11 09:52 AM
0

the media isn't misogynist though. it's misandrist
/r/MensRights18/12/11 09:44 AM
0

that applies to you. not me.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 09:42 AM
6

i updated it.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 10:40 AM
1

Wasn't Hillary mentioned and her words? She wasn't talking about volunteer armies. She was talking about general war. That's where the bs comes from. I agree with you but you seemed to be defending Hillary for her bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 10:39 AM
13

"you can't read this, proving your argument about perception wrong"
/r/MensRights17/12/11 10:34 AM
7

that is a tiny fragment of the article and is really a nothing If I can't perceive something, then I need to adjust my perception, not the world around me. oifjvbbnwenjqwekopfwvsdmpkvr wfeonjqwefpijfwe pijnfwe noifwe What did I just type as a message to you ^ here?
/r/MensRights17/12/11 09:52 AM
0

The difference between bitter MRA and feminist is this: Who is correct and who is sexist and full of shit. Don't look at the bitterness that is a distraction. Look at what is right. Bitterness from a misandric media and government is expected.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 09:32 AM
1

they also got lighter sentences, as today. the judicial system is so fucking sexist.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 09:25 AM
2

I wouldn't necessarily label all of historical societies in that context. Matriarchs were present throughout history and wielded maximum power. Also men were arguably "oppressed" more than women.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 09:20 AM
1

Go to a military base. Walk inside. Go up to a soldier and tell him you think he's a victim. Let me know how that goes. Do you know what conscription is? Even being an educated woman how could you let that "slip" your mind, unless you have no idea what it's like to be a man? Also, men are targeted and treated more brutally in war. Basically any man or male teen is often killed or shot on sight. A fate MUCH worse than what women girls and the elderly face. Clearly. It's a fucking insult of the gr…
/r/MensRights17/12/11 09:14 AM
3

of course. but i don't think we should put women into pigeon holes. that isn't helpful to anyone. feminists try to put down traditional, submissive women as well as women in the pornography industry. men should not put down any group of women, unless they are feminists-a category which includes many men.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 09:09 AM
2

your semantics about disqualifying men from being victims of war is outrageous.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 07:39 AM
4

sluts and whores are awesome. men's rights support all types of women as long as it's their personal cultural or religious choice. feminists don't.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 07:08 AM
0

stupid entitled bitch. how about women give their seats up for men?
/r/MensRights17/12/11 07:08 AM
4

It definitely is rape for some bitch to shove her smelly diseased vagina over a dude's penis. This outrageous official, government misandry.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 07:06 AM
2

You are a misandrist. How dare you designify the death and sacrifice of men. You are a piece of shit.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 07:01 AM
-10

Feminism made her deranged. Who has mastered what now, retard?
/r/MensRights17/12/11 06:57 AM
1

There are a few who are new to all this though. They can be honestly wrong.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 06:56 AM
2

Demonspawn is not a radical.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 06:54 AM
1

I think you know what was meant.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 06:53 AM
3

He even writes about the man who lit himself on fire, but the entire article is about women. All men who sacrifice their lives ignored totally (women do not join armed revolution and do not die-in any statistical significance, that is). Where do these morons come from???
/r/MensRights17/12/11 06:49 AM
1

Read it and weep, feminist
/r/MensRights16/12/11 02:09 PM
1

look at this. who believes in fictional characters as guiding real life more? women.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 02:08 PM
1

Women are more irrational than men if you take this poll on religiousity as a measurement. It proves you dead wrong. "Women support religion and religious bullshit far more than men. 59-41. 58-47" Fuck you, feminist.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 02:06 PM
-9

God I fucking hate feminists. Put them to the guillotine.
/r/MensRights28/11/11 07:45 AM
-2

Women in Africa seem to get by without nothing and raise hordes of children. I don't buy this bullshit about support anyways.
/r/MensRights28/11/11 07:43 AM
2

If a woman is with a someone like that it was her responsibility not to have taken precautions.
/r/MensRights28/11/11 05:25 AM
1

Good point. about time to check out r/wikileaks again
/r/MensRights28/11/11 05:09 AM
2

The UK feeds radical feminism to Canada/Australia as you can see by the credentials of the author. Judging from this article the Australian media just laps it up...the editors must be radical feminists.
/r/MensRights28/11/11 05:02 AM
0

Wkipedia is a piece of shit
/r/MensRights14/11/11 07:33 AM
1

You're right.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 01:40 PM
-8

So what? Who the fuck are you?
/r/MensRights05/11/11 01:30 PM
1

the law is new and it was made for a reason. pigs are part of the government
/r/MensRights21/10/11 07:31 AM
1

http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/97375/obnoxious-swearing-is-about-to-be-illegal-in-australia/
/r/MensRights20/10/11 06:15 PM
1

You should be able to do so and I hope you call whoever you believe to be a cunt, one. Do you live in Australia? Apparently it's illegal to swear anywhere in one of the big states there and police will fine you. Welcome to socialism/facism.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 01:35 PM
3

The same reason they argue against female circumcision but defend male circumcision. Sexism and receiving as much money from the state and men as possible. Feminists have started a gender war and are clinging onto what they have gained and what male feminists have given them.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 12:05 PM
7

Men have invented almost every tool in modern period and throughout history. There is no reason to believe there is an exception.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 12:01 PM
3

I need some upvotes to see if r/Australia can throw some light to it. Upvote here
/r/MensRights20/10/11 05:49 AM
3

There are two differences in the two scenarios. One is the current law, which says this bitch should be convicted as a child rapist. And the law should be applied without sexism. We are talking about the legal here. The other is about what the law should be. That is different. So now what do you have to say with this woman child rapist walking free?
/r/MensRights20/10/11 05:05 AM
2

I guess kind of a parallel would be the fact that minorities that comes from disadvantaged homes tend to get more opportunities than Caucasians that come from the same circumstances, when I feel that everybody should have exactly equal opportunities That's the point. You know didn't you see the FAQ in the sidebar?
/r/MensRights20/10/11 04:45 AM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/li7hv/vawa_has_resulted_in_an_avalanche_of_false/c2svx28
/r/MensRights20/10/11 04:43 AM
2

They are not cases in Australia. Australian Crime Victims Support Association president Noel McNamara: said the sentence was a disgrace. "If it was a man on those charges it would have been a different story," he said. It doesn't seem like they were prior offenders/broke prior court orders, like this woman. It doesn't seem like in any of those cases, the man gave alcohol to the child, like this woman. In at least one of those cases, the man had paid for the girl's education which is more than wh…
/r/MensRights20/10/11 04:42 AM
6

A story in r/mensrights just now about woman in Australia who just raped 4 boys after plying them with alcohol and the Australian judge let her walk free. What do you say to that?
/r/MensRights20/10/11 04:34 AM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/lhzqi/women_gets_boys_drunk_and_has_sex_with_them_walks/c2sxb9s
/r/MensRights20/10/11 04:31 AM
2

They are not cases in Australia. Australian Crime Victims Support Association president Noel McNamara: said the sentence was a disgrace. "If it was a man on those charges it would have been a different story," he said. It doesn't seem like they were prior offenders/broke prior court orders, like this woman. It doesn't seem like in any of those cases, the man gave alcohol to the child, like this woman. In at least one of those cases, the man had paid for the girl's education which is more than wh…
/r/MensRights20/10/11 04:30 AM
2

Because participation is ignorable and passive. Injection implies immunization. An active installment. Learn to be a little smarter about your shallow understanding of language.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 04:18 AM
1

Australia. Fucking feminist wasteland. Their legal system is compromised. " No jail because of "low self-esteem" " Can this legal defense now be used by men in this situation? I also thought drunk people or children couldn't consent.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 04:09 AM
2

Great comment. Appreciated. This is relevant: "I was in a class of nine- and 10-year-olds, girls and boys, and this young woman was telling these kids that the reason for wars was the innately violent nature of men. "You could see the little girls, fat with complacency and conceit while the little boys sat there crumpled, apologising for their existence, thinking this was going to be the pattern of their lives." Lessing said the teacher tried to "catch my eye, thinking I would approve of this ru…
/r/MensRights20/10/11 03:53 AM
1

Upmod. Great comment.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 03:51 AM
3

you don't know yourself very well.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 08:39 AM
1

how about the reason that he's wrong in most of them? proving one case of bad downvoting doesn't dismiss the trend of him being wrong.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 01:59 AM
1

what a fucking scumbag. reddit traffic probably increased tho. free publicity. he's aa good example of feminist media and oppression of the free speech principle
/r/MensRights19/10/11 01:55 AM
-3

There is no such thing as Rape Culture. It's propaganda. The government is your enemy.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 01:42 AM
-1

You are man-hating, pussy-worshipping scumbag anyway.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 01:39 AM
2

you have to admit, the comments are accurate and it may as well be you.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 01:36 AM
1

By default, the entire article was intended to be quoted.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 01:33 AM
1

what Anderson Cooper thing?
/r/MensRights19/10/11 01:30 AM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/l45o4/why_are_women_drawn_to_men_behind_bars/c2ps5c5
/r/MensRights18/10/11 07:33 PM
0

women are like this because men are not. learn to read and quit being a feminist
/r/MensRights18/10/11 07:30 PM
1

these are serial killers etc. not 'rule breakers'
/r/MensRights18/10/11 07:29 PM
1

qft
/r/MensRights18/10/11 05:54 PM
2

what reason was it taken away exactly?
/r/MensRights18/10/11 05:48 PM
6

Governments and particularly courts and police are showing open misandry now. Expect to see more of this flagrant misandry or special treatment and apologists for women.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 05:46 PM
0

no one answered the question. legitimate criticism is not misogyny. sorry to burst all your bubbles
/r/MensRights08/10/11 01:13 PM
2

answer the question
/r/MensRights08/10/11 01:13 PM
1

so how does this not show what i said
/r/MensRights07/10/11 05:19 PM
2

Rape is a political agenda for feminists
/r/MensRights06/10/11 11:59 AM
-10

Again women are shown to be disappointing and scheming. Reality has a mens rights bias
/r/MensRights06/10/11 11:49 AM
1

Feminists are parasites. DAE think feminists do this in order to control men in society by pretending it's intolerable hate speech?
/r/MensRights02/10/11 05:16 PM
3

i'd say it's dangerous to men considering how many women are confused about threats to them and what rape is.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 03:37 PM
1

white-rights and jail-bait are on the same level, that's for sure No it's not for sure.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 03:23 PM
-3

r/jailbait is the best subreddit.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 03:19 PM
0

and parrents should be prosecuted for child porn if they take pictures of their underage children. that's what you wrote.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 03:11 PM
0

there is nothing wrong about naked children. it's natural and so are pictures of naked children
/r/MensRights01/10/11 02:51 PM
1

it's negative because the truth is negative.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 02:47 PM
1

interesting
/r/MensRights01/10/11 02:45 PM
1

there is
/r/MensRights01/10/11 02:44 PM
1

your blog sucks and you suck. you should accept the criticism because it's true
/r/MensRights01/10/11 02:44 PM
1

You should be
/r/MensRights01/10/11 02:42 PM
1

One submission and you come out with bs like you did? Think about it. You are not going to agree with every single link posted and if you disagree that doesn't address your post that caused this. Secondly the mod of malestudies has quite a few bannable links in the sidebar. I don't agree with those rules. That subreddit has nothing to do with this one-in fact I believe the mod made it because there was too much freedom to talk how you want in r/mensrights
/r/MensRights30/09/11 08:45 AM
-2

No anti-Paul people in men's rights, please. The above is true and mras should not be political about Paul. Men's rights should try to be partisan-neutral unless there are facts that support one side or another.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 08:39 AM
2

It could be that feminists are contributing to this.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 08:38 AM
2

looks like theindignation is voicing a truth without realizing it. "the undeclared war on men" certainly explains a lot of synchronized government policy across the world.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 05:51 AM
4

I'll be nice and not post this to SRS. Shit reddit says is simply an indication of what is not politically correct to say. No one is threatened by you posting this wherever you want. SRS represents a totalitarian desire for controlling speech. Feminists should know better than to use Shaming language against the men's rights movement. But of course, like everything else, when it's useful to feminists they will oppress men with extreme hate and misandry without a second thought as to their hypocr…
/r/MensRights30/09/11 05:42 AM
2

Men are treated differently according to these stereotypes in all areas: judicial, political, law enforcement, media, workplace, war. you are blind and out of touch with reality. A fact is a fact. Often facts make the mainstream status quo uncomfortable. We see this all the time in the media when they do not report on facts
/r/MensRights30/09/11 05:29 AM
3

misandry
/r/MensRights30/09/11 05:27 AM
5

he doesn't sound that bright. how could he not do that?
/r/MensRights30/09/11 05:25 AM
1

White people experience discrimination and sexism too. Are they non-people to you?
/r/MensRights29/09/11 05:35 PM
0

If you are wrong in your assumptions though....
/r/MensRights29/09/11 05:32 PM
1

How the fuck is that doctor06 have ANY credibility when his blanket statement doesn't even apply to 1% of the content, submissions and posts?????????????????????????????????????????????????? That's a daft reason to change it. The moron is lying through his teeth
/r/MensRights29/09/11 05:30 PM
1

the severity of the assault can be seen by the effect on him. it's a severe assault. i would have beat that little bitch black and blue
/r/MensRights29/09/11 05:22 PM
1

cut that bullshit out children do not deserve special protection. what happens if your throat gets cut by a little girl while you were sleeping?
/r/MensRights29/09/11 05:20 PM
2

this isn't really about Men's Rights, it's about men vs women. It's about men vs feminism.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 03:28 PM
1

I'm sorry. I don't understand what you're saying here. All I meant was his comment could be balanced by someone saying, well conservatives can be like this.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 03:25 PM
2

Often people don't qualify their blanket statements with "some", "many" etc. Anyway it's only one poster. Big deal. Anyone can post how right wing people often undermine men's rights with their zero-tolerance policing policies and the white girl syndrome.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 03:15 PM
2

the truth can sometimes seem extreme to the unaware
/r/MensRights28/09/11 03:12 PM
1

I think he was speculating about a group of people not everyone-even though it comes across as the latter.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 03:05 PM
2

Don't take it personally. You can see that left wing governments generally promote feminism and particularly radical feminism more than right wing governments. It shouldn't be all that controversial. This isn't to say that liberals aren't good people or have great moral ideas either. They support gay people, for example and other freedoms.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 02:58 PM
3

Women in the UK are like this.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 01:09 PM
-1

Definitely. Propaganda for children. You see this a bit with Marvel comics.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 01:06 PM
4

If women "feel threatened" by a man he now commits a crime.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 01:02 PM
-4

People who post positive LGBT posts aren't as likely to face scrutiny, whereas posts that find fault with LGBT positions (in general) will likely face greater scrutiny. That's true. Men's rights should not become a liberal political subreddit. Liberals are responsible for most of feminism to date.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 12:58 PM
1

this is a good one
/r/MensRights28/09/11 12:51 PM
0

Scum are scum, regardless of whether they're women. I would say the same if men did that to women. Political correctness and paranoia is getting the better of you.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 12:40 PM
-1

I'm just waiting for feminists to be drafted and sent to their bloody deaths on the front lines.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 12:38 PM
1

Why on Earth are there so many MRAs willing to stoop to the feminists' level? Fuck everything about this. You have to use their own language sometimes.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 12:27 PM
0

in a way it is. but it erodes the claims by feminists of oppression quite a lot
/r/MensRights27/09/11 06:30 PM
0

that's a good point. and all mra's should know that feminists use "safe spaces" to win. by curbing your own expression, you are playing into their hands. As long as it's on target and a fraction of your total posts it can't be objectionable or destructive. By being constrained by feminists men have had to fight with their hands behind their back. No wonder men lose politically.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 06:13 PM
1

I would expect them to not do that. I myself would not. I don't see the problem. It's professionalism.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 06:03 PM
-2

Scum are scum, regardless of whether they're women. I would say the same if men did that to women. Political correctness and paranoia is getting the better of you.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 06:03 PM
-2

Really?
/r/MensRights27/09/11 05:32 PM
6

And who cares anyway? Testosterone is what makes men so great. Can you imagine an article by a man being published saying the world needs less estrogen??
/r/MensRights27/09/11 05:01 PM
16

Women have only 10 per cent of the testosterone that men have. But they probably have 210 per cent of the judgment ...stupid bitch
/r/MensRights27/09/11 04:59 PM
-9

No I'm not. Those women are fucking scum.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 04:51 PM
-1

Every parent DOES have an obligation to support their children until adulthood No they don't. Adults are not slaves to their children. How fucked up is that? The child is like fucking nobility right now because of you morons. Children are slaves to adults until they are free (or should be).
/r/MensRights27/09/11 04:47 PM
2

What the fuck? These sentences are just pure misandry. Mainstream feminism at work.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 04:44 PM
0

The "standards" for soldiering is bullshit. They conscripted any male who could walk in wartime. Those men won the war. Other countries prove that little boys and girls can be great soldiers.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 04:38 PM
1

That's simply unprofessional training and behavior of soldiers.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 04:36 PM
-2

Women are more intolerant of men who wear female clothing. If women dated guys who wore dresses then guys would wear dresses. Female oppression, in other words. Women are bigots.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 04:32 PM
-29

Those bitches deserved to be raped a thousand times and then killed. Or put to the front lines.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 04:25 PM
8

Lol...As predicted, feminists like this don't like male tastes and want to hobble men everywhere with their "safe spaces" across the world.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 04:23 PM
0

illustrate exactly why it still wouldn't be the same as actually giving women the legal right to vote. I never said it was the same. I said that they effectively had the vote in many cases. Many men defer to the concerns of their wife, or daughter.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 06:22 AM
0

only women who've gotten married, and are capable of controlling their husband, can vote. Women could influence their whole family, be they fathers, brothers or husbands. That is a pool of nearly all men. Particularly women who are wives, daughters or sisters of nobility or powerful men.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 06:02 AM
4

“We wanted to make sure that people are not just trying to cohabitate just to avoid alimony,’’ Biscardi said. “We hope that this will make it so that people will get married if they wish to.’’ They want men to get married so are trying to entrap/trick men by making it less bad.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 05:38 AM
1

try not to let the attacks get to you. if you have a justifiable viewpoint you should say it even if it's not politically correct. However men's rights want to avoid having weak spots to attack which is why there is probably a lot of criticism directed your way (if you have a controversial viewpoint)
/r/MensRights27/09/11 04:45 AM
8

jesus christ....imagine how much lying, betrayal and cheating that represents
/r/MensRights27/09/11 04:42 AM
0

not really. the legality is only symbolic if they voted through their husbands.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 04:39 AM
2

My comment was directed at others who may be responding to you with ad hominems.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 05:16 PM
2

This is where I question the accusations that feminism is a socialist conspiracy. i would call it not being able to predict the future combined with ideological idealism.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 04:46 PM
2

Ironic isn't it? They are familiar with the concept of discrimination and oppression of various groups but when it comes to men they seem to be totally pro-sexism, pro-discrimination purely because of ideology. Kind of sickening, really.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 03:07 PM
1

It's less risky to disclose imo. But put it this way: Wouldn't it be better psychologically if the guy accepted the trans person after they disclosed?
/r/MensRights26/09/11 03:00 PM
1

Avoid ad hominems. Maybe the blog has something in it. Maybe not.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 02:54 PM
1

Does masculism support traditional men and roles?
/r/MensRights26/09/11 02:27 PM
1

Ok Mr 11 day old account.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 02:26 PM
2

Therefore I suggest we implement laws that require women to stop having sex with big, bulky, cocky football players they are naturally attracted to, and to instead have sex with wimpy, acne-ridden, skinny nerds. The only problem with this rant is that feminist nerds tend to not actually do anything constructive for men, but simply further feminists goals. You can see this tendency in video game journalism that often puts feminist cries at the forefront whenever a nice game with hot babes is made…
/r/MensRights26/09/11 08:09 AM
2

women actually want men who stand up for other men.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 08:05 AM
1

Lol, jackasses. I was saying that they sometimes had the vote.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 07:53 AM
1

This is a good lesson in how feminists destroy male interests and deprive men of their sexuality. A feminist's ultimate goal (unintentionally or not) is to take everything away from a man that he likes. Usually through censorship, self or otherwise.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 04:59 PM
-15

Women always 'had the vote' through their husbands. The whole idea that they did not have the vote at all is disingenuous and not true. The word or concern of the 'fairer sex' back then would have counted for a lot to your average husband. In fact, women probably had the vote by changing their husbands or their father's mind and nullifying his vote.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 04:55 PM
1

and a mangina MRA sub lol. r/masculism?
/r/MensRights24/09/11 06:29 PM
5

Legal prostitution There are also some catches with legalization movements when they are instigated by feminists. All that regulation is seen as a means to protect the "female victim" again from potential abuse, which while good is not necessarily that good when feminists become involved and start setting the conditions and rights a man has. Think "non-threatening, safe space" that feminists advocate before banning all oppositional comment and criticism.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 06:04 PM
3

Frankly, I think most are pretty egalitarian and are simply uninformed on men's issues That counts for nothing as virtually all of this type have zero political influence. And they can think and present as if they are egalitarian until they see a list of men's rights objectives.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 05:44 PM
14

So where did feminists get all their money to bribe government?
/r/MensRights24/09/11 05:36 PM
2

I thought prostitution was reasonably profitable.. I guess it depends
/r/MensRights24/09/11 05:34 PM
4

Anti-prostitution campaigners are liars. They constantly misrepresent what prostitutes do and believe and pretend that all prostitutes are feminists. It's outrageous how they get away with so much bullshit, everywhere.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 05:32 PM
1

sometimes you don't need examples
/r/MensRights22/09/11 04:27 AM
5

is there a reason this is downmodded?
/r/MensRights16/09/11 08:03 AM
1

I think it's an assumption because I don't see it that way. if he is "sexually addicted" then it can be argued by the same types of people he has a "weak, addictive" personality and "can't hold office". He's also "perverted" (because sexuality is usually seen as compromising by media). Whereas if he says something like, "she is a lying bitch-many men are falsely accused and the media also falsely accused me. I am a victim of the media and another liar. I am however capable as ever."
/r/MensRights16/09/11 07:59 AM
3

The existence of transsexuals PROVE that gender is biologically innate qft
/r/MensRights16/09/11 07:49 AM
0

Lol
/r/MensRights14/09/11 03:42 PM
15

"Chivalry is not dead," he said. It is when it's forced, "genius".
/r/MensRights14/09/11 03:36 PM
1

Oh, I'd love to hear how putting your hands down the pants of a sleeping person is excusable. Do elaborate. FTFY
/r/MensRights14/09/11 03:30 PM
-2

Even if consensual, consent once is not consent forever, and putting your hands down the pants of a sleeping person is inexcusable. No it isn't.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 12:12 PM
1

It could be 4500 best example/random inmates. It's not.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 12:04 PM
3

Is there a good way to id crazy?
/r/MensRights14/09/11 11:58 AM
0

Someone may say the same when you bitch about something. Remember your indifference when that happens.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 11:57 AM
3

Police unions should be destroyed.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 11:51 AM
0

Huge difference then running away at first sight of a cars light. Some people are beaten to death and killed by the police or vigilantes. Sometimes witnesses give false evidence because they saw something they didn't really see but are too idiotic or prejudiced to realize that. It's a perfectly reasonable reaction to run away particularly if women are automatically seen as victims. Look at your own responses. Judge first. Do not question fully. That's a technique of mob justice and why there are…
/r/MensRights13/09/11 03:01 PM
0

Can you concealed carry in either? How do you avoid being mugged or murdered in the back streets?
/r/MensRights13/09/11 02:31 PM
0

Does this kind of mentality of authority sound great to you? Police To Be Able To Fine For Swearing But in July 2008, the former Labor state government introduced a trial under which police were given powers to issue on-the-spot fines of $238.90 to anyone deemed by an officer to have used indecent or offensive language in a public place. An amendment to the Act now before Parliament, and likely to be passed this week, will enshrine those powers. Australia’s 20 Worst Cases of Censorship and Moral…
/r/MensRights13/09/11 02:30 PM
1

Stay away from the radfems and you'll probably be just fine, and hopefully enjoy the further demise of radical feminism in our otherwise pretty sweet little country :) How do you detect them? Do they hang out at certain places? Dress certain ways? is there something you can say to see if they are one before you sleep with one accidentally?
/r/MensRights13/09/11 02:27 PM
1

My exchange with some Australian redditors recently leads me to believe that boneheaded, stubborn, obnoxious policy and anti-freedom policy is the norm in Australia. Aussies seem to like the government taking things away and defend it when called on it.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 01:59 PM
2

Were the assaults when she was in bed with him then? Because the article suggests they had consensual sex several times.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 01:40 PM
1

Were they in a relationship? If they're undressing it sounds like it. And it that case it's more complex. Would you support a female lover touching her lover while he slept?
/r/MensRights13/09/11 01:33 PM
3

Let's not be pc either. Anyone can say what they want about anyone else as long as it's not harrassing or spammy.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 01:30 PM
2

Where is the link? Does the bitch support older men being interested in teen girls? If so she is unbiased.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 01:23 PM
3

Anyone understand this? Calvert's trial heard that the woman stripped to her underwear during a game of truth or dare before the assaults at the house to which the group adjourned after partying at the casino. She found out about the assaults three months later How can she not know she was assaulted whilst playing a game and undressing?
/r/MensRights13/09/11 01:19 PM
1

Mr Sonnet said although the Crown's range of three to 4½ years' prison appeared low, there were mitigating factors including Calvert's youth. I doubt a woman would get 3 - 4 years prison for something like this.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 01:18 PM
2

You are wrong. The judge had the fiance or newborn in mind when sentencing and made up bullshit excuses. Also the judge probably gets teary eyed about the military and gets military men off as lightly as possible.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 01:14 PM
3

As long as sluts are not seen as bad or undesirable i dont mind this. Good and bad girls are both hot and both have self respect. Traditional women are hot also
/r/MensRights13/09/11 11:59 AM
5

No, but you see, all of these privileges stem from the patriarchal belief that women are weak. So it's actual oppression. And we'll keep the oppression because we feminists like all of these priveleges.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 10:56 AM
2

Feminists actively keep women's privelege in the judicial system. And feminist judges are responsible too.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 06:43 AM
0

Only because the woman was questioned on her rape claim which is what I am defending in this situation.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 05:53 AM
-2

People like you would have convicted the innocent male victim for rape in the link I provided, because you would sympathetically not question the claims of the 'attempted rape' victim seen naked in the road crying rape.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 05:50 AM
-6

You can't say the act of pulling down someone's pants is attempted rape. It could be that she was crawling away and that was at waist height. It could be that all he wanted to do was sexually assault her, but not rape. Could be that that piece of the story is 100% fictional. And an innocent man would go to prison because of the don't ask don't tell policy of not questioning female victims due to political correctness. Example real scenario of this happening. Clothes 'torn off' by assailant but t…
/r/MensRights12/09/11 03:23 PM
9

Grandmothers are sticking it to the patriarchy? Mothers raping their daughters are sticking it to the patriarchy?
/r/MensRights12/09/11 03:19 PM
-1

That explicitly says she was not raped in the title.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 03:14 PM
1

It's simply a speculation based on the fact there is a new mod. Good to know.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 02:48 PM
1

4chan ftw
/r/MensRights12/09/11 02:39 PM
0

To be fair those scenarios are probably rare. People will still burn to death in such cases.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 01:25 PM
4

i guess you should cut down on being spammy
/r/MensRights12/09/11 12:57 PM
2

do you explain all your moderating activity? give it a rest ignatiusloyola may flip out sometime and then it will be bad for everyone. maybe that's your goal
/r/MensRights12/09/11 12:56 PM
-1

Maybe there is a good reason to let the troll post or show leniency? Trolls should be accepted as much as possible imo without them becoming spammy.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 12:55 PM
4

Who cares if people are rude? Heavy moderation is also rude and vulgar btw.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 12:53 PM
-4

but don't claim she certainly wasn't raped. She wasn't! Luckily she was questioned, huh? All this touchy sensitivity around women is sexism. Women deserve the same treatment as men under equality and that means not being treated specially. Second to that, she had foreknowledge of the environment she was posting to and should have expected to be questioned. That's what free speech is all about. Because she made it semi-political at least at the beginning that made it more controversial and open t…
/r/MensRights12/09/11 12:41 PM
20

A very important point here. For those who don't believe in conspiracies and feminist subversion in the entire system, including judicial: A senior Labour source said: "The Labour Party is in the best position to make policy on all the key issues because we have key women in the NHS, in education, in all the important areas."
/r/MensRights11/09/11 05:45 PM
-4

If you say so :-D
/r/MensRights11/09/11 10:25 AM
-4

Lol, what rape victim would post pics of the assault to a social news site?
/r/MensRights11/09/11 10:22 AM
-2

http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/i7ins/have_the_terms_upmoddownmod_died_completely/ Why do you keep on discrediting yourself by throwing "bitches" into every second post? That's your opinion.
/r/MensRights11/09/11 07:25 AM
19

So according to feminists the man is being raped right?
/r/MensRights10/09/11 05:38 PM
2

In addition to snoopyzanus' comment, maybe because it shows physically 'violent' responses to verbal comments are seen as appropriate? Would the director have guys 'physically punishing' snarky wives?
/r/MensRights10/09/11 05:37 PM
6

but the defence argued that virtually every infanticide case in Canada has resulted in non-custodial punishment for women. Wow. Notice the, "for women" part.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 05:29 PM
0

Everyone's wrong sometimes, including you.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 06:09 AM
0

Call it a "guesstimate"
/r/MensRights10/09/11 05:52 AM
0

Who is being presumptuously condescending now? Maybe you are a jackass?
/r/MensRights10/09/11 05:45 AM
-1

I specified that you, specifically, are a jackass, and not your point or persons who agree with it. Why not say that then?
/r/MensRights10/09/11 05:42 AM
-1

You destroy your own credibility. I never said "personally" anything. My comment was about why it was so upmodded and the truth behind that. Men are harassed by police for many reasons. Being called a 'creep' may provoke someone to call the cops who will comply with the bitch who called. You don't know how pigs operate.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 05:01 AM
-1

Any agreement is good.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 04:44 AM
4

That quote is from a modern feminist lobbyist in response to the article about the author's comments about modern feminism and women. Imo you are correct in this: She is praising the third-wave for abandoning the whole equality thing in favor of seizing power for their own matriarchal benefit.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 04:39 AM
-1

How does it destroy credibility?
/r/MensRights10/09/11 03:21 AM
-2

So your personal experience overrules the widespread upmodded comic in your opinion?
/r/MensRights10/09/11 03:19 AM
1

Differing views can sometimes be obnoxious and wrong.
/r/MensRights09/09/11 03:47 PM
-1

.... You're not using your "brain" in the way the dictionary indicates that it should be used.
/r/MensRights09/09/11 03:43 PM
-4

No it isn't. Show me a woman ever who wouldn't be creeped out by binoculars. Wow. Creeped out by an object. Shoot yourself now and do all men with binoculars a favor.
/r/MensRights09/09/11 03:18 PM
0

Women do, in fact, do this though ...................................not all or even necessarily most................................. That's why it has so many upmods.
/r/MensRights09/09/11 03:04 PM
-5

you don't really help by raising a giant flagpole for them to point to as proof. you misread the issue and allow them to judge mensrights because of it.
/r/MensRights09/09/11 02:26 PM
-1

this is not about unattractive mra, it's about men who are labeled creeps for saying hi to a bitch. Being labeled "creepy" can lead to the police route for harrassment/deviant/stalking/restraining order charge. The more normal male behavior being called creepy -misandry- means the more men going to prison or being harrased by the feminist law enforcement system.
/r/MensRights09/09/11 02:06 PM
2

sometimes im hyper sensitive to feminist bullshit. and it's not an interpretation it's a fact of how men are treated by bitches
/r/MensRights09/09/11 02:04 PM
1

So throwing it around like the bitches in the comic means men could be subject to harrassment charges, restraining orders or the cops being called because of the "stalker/creep/sexual deviant" labels etc. It's much similar to the "everything is now rape" feminist disease. Put it this way. A lot of traditional male behavior in seeking and approaching a partner . sometimes called wooing, is being turned inside out as bad by feminists to make relations between men and women harder. Men are seen to …
/r/MensRights09/09/11 02:02 PM
-4

Ps. You are a piece of shit for misreading the issue and spreading your ignorance
/r/MensRights09/09/11 01:48 PM
-2

And your comment indicates you do not understand the issue and have many feminists from r/shitredditsays to upmod you.
/r/MensRights09/09/11 01:46 PM
4

It only drives away feminists - like yourself. This is about double standards women apply on the sexual harrasment issue to men and reveals their hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights09/09/11 01:45 PM
-7

You're joking right? Are you a feminist?
/r/MensRights09/09/11 01:44 PM
2

I want to shoot anyone who uses the word objectified as if it's a bad or new thing. Fucking idiots.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 12:59 PM
1

governments work slowly
/r/MensRights08/09/11 12:57 PM
2

Thanks for the update. I'll take some of it back. I guess I overreacted. But you have to admit the international environment on liberty is under pressure from western governments....they are getting more corrupt and repressive by the week.
/r/MensRights05/09/11 04:25 PM
5

http://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/do111/losing_hope_with_the_antifeminist_sentiments_on/c11mgfs
/r/MensRights05/09/11 03:06 PM
5

the post is below in the comments
/r/MensRights05/09/11 02:36 PM
16

http://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/do111/losing_hope_with_the_antifeminist_sentiments_on/
/r/MensRights05/09/11 02:32 PM
-6

I'm tending toward the latter thought here. Do you say that because you tend toward feminism? I note your post in Australian subreddit which indicates you may have the background of a feminist-socialist from Australia
/r/MensRights05/09/11 01:06 PM
-4

No. Your description of rape is backward. And that's not surprising since you are a feminist.
/r/MensRights05/09/11 01:02 PM
-5

Seriously, don't jump on someone just because they feel they were raped, that's a quick way to discredit this entire fucking movement. Seriously, no it isn't. The rape is up to dispute at any time. Questioning these often made up stories is absolutely necessary to protect against lying bitches who are becoming more and more numerous the more that feminists confuse them about rape.
/r/MensRights05/09/11 01:00 PM
0

Everybody should be able to say whatever they want, whenever they want - even if it's damaging for society Uhh. Goodbye. If you do not respect freedom you have no place anywhere but a despotism. I hope your opinion is not widely held but the way you talk about all this including America-bashing makes me think there's a socialist, government component of this belief. You've been trained to believe that way, buddy. No sheeple please. Isn't Australia land of the sheep or something?
/r/MensRights05/09/11 12:57 PM
1

From what I've seen of the Australian press, they appear to be very similar to Canada (why does this happen..you guys share a government or something??????). There are a lot of feminists in the senior ranks of the media.
/r/MensRights05/09/11 12:47 PM
11

Does it matter considering the reaction of redditors?
/r/MensRights04/09/11 12:13 PM
2

Is the payment equal between men and women?
/r/MensRights04/09/11 11:29 AM
1

from the most sexist government Australia has ever experienced. So every country seems to be taking notes and pushing further and further with misandry.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 11:29 AM
1

ouch. gotta hurt..gl
/r/MensRights01/09/11 12:56 PM
0

I don't think so. Only a particular group see a bad image and they are feminists.
/r/MensRights26/08/11 10:42 AM
0

the odds are extremely unlikely
/r/MensRights25/08/11 05:49 AM
0

lmao. i shouldn't bother with this but how is saying that women who behave dishonestly as indicated are probably shooting themselves in the foot?
/r/MensRights25/08/11 12:38 AM
0

I disagree. they are useful. the bad image is in your mind
/r/MensRights24/08/11 08:04 PM
0

what is ironic is that they are more likely to alienate a guy they like when they behave like this.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 07:25 PM
5

Blatant sexism published as normal. Media editors are responsible for signing off and hiring these people.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 01:03 PM
2

This is a men's right issue?
/r/MensRights24/08/11 01:00 PM
-1

80-90% of the traits align with both, retard.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 12:13 PM
-1

what about the reaction in media? this seems not to raises eyebrows but if it were reversed with fuckable this, fuckable that, no body hair, do you think feminists would raise a shitstorm?
/r/MensRights23/08/11 01:02 PM
-4

No I would not have said that. It's the unique combination of feminist and 'real man' that's interesting.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 12:59 PM
0

I'm thinking it would be more of a shitstorm if feminists saw a male singer write something like this.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 12:57 PM
-2

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/jrjx2/aging_feminist_desperate_for_mantype_real/c2ek3qe
/r/MensRights23/08/11 12:56 PM
1

I wonder how it would go down if a male singer said he wanted a list of such and then said and she must be: Must be very 'cute'. Not just fuckable. Must be fuckable. No body hair. etc..
/r/MensRights23/08/11 12:41 PM
0

no clue
/r/MensRights23/08/11 12:38 PM
-3

Did you read the list of requirements yet?
/r/MensRights23/08/11 11:46 AM
-1

Interested parties can apply at (for real): [email protected] Guess we could find out...
/r/MensRights23/08/11 11:43 AM
1

Lol,yeh. You can downmod it if you want.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 11:42 AM
2

Did I get this right?.....in case it was a joke article.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 10:02 AM
4

Still privately legal?
/r/MensRights23/08/11 09:20 AM
1

If you missed my point you would think that.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 08:31 PM
-2

Apparently you have no idea about bra design.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 07:51 PM
-1

Um, no, most bras are fitted to be comfortable and support the bra. Push-up bras are for looking sexy, but not regular bras. The lift is just a side effect of keeping them from jostling around. You're either being naive or continuing a feminist viewpoint.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 07:08 PM
2

the shit you have to know now about statistics used by governments to promote feminist agendas......
/r/MensRights22/08/11 06:57 PM
-1

I see your point but look at bras they are fitted to make the breast lift and more full/attractive. There is status clothing like animal furs and coats
/r/MensRights22/08/11 06:52 PM
-1

Don't listen to them.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 06:51 PM
0

No. Staring is normal. How obvious it is is a matter of both individuals and their comfort levels. Some women love it some don't. Regardless of who does and does not the threshold is about manners, not perversion. I think it's actual perversion to expect restraints on male sexuality. I think it's fucking outrageous.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 06:50 PM
-1

Nothing about women's fashion (not just clothing, but actual fashion) is about being attractive to straight men. More insanity and ideological feminism. Women's fashion is designed to show off female biology which is inherently attractive and arousing to males.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 06:35 PM
4

Women's oppressed position throughout history varied from "less than human" to "helpless and feeble like children" to "so sacred we have to keep them locked away". You are being extremely disingenuous and compromising yourself badly. 1 Have you never heard of female rulers like Elizabeth I and "Let Them Eat Cake" Marie Antoinette? 2 Have you never heard of wealthy women luxuriant in the arms of nobility? 3 What about the special status of freedom from disabling, dangerous, often fatal work, incl…
/r/MensRights22/08/11 06:28 PM
0

i think you missed my point
/r/MensRights22/08/11 06:21 PM
-1

They could have had the decency to shut the hell up.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 06:17 PM
1

It's a license. For flying a small plane. You need a licence to fly a slightly larger plane, why is this different? They're extremely expensive for a lot of people and unnecessary since they are tiny. A lot of people's freedom is taken away with this type of shit. "A system of licensing and registration is the perfect device to deny gun ownership to the bourgeoisie." - Vladimir Lenin Governments exploit poverty to deprive people of liberty.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 03:47 PM
2

No body else cares. So only the freedoms of other people counts? Do you have any respect at all for other people's freedom or your own-which is an extremely selfish position to take??? And.. helmet laws? I'd rather be forced to protect myself than forced to go through cancer inducing TSA scanners. Other people who ride bikes might disagree and not want to be forced. TSA? You can be patted down instead. If you look at it in terms of numbers, infringements of liberty on forcing helmets down people…
/r/MensRights22/08/11 03:27 PM
10

Women's Police Station W T F
/r/MensRights22/08/11 01:55 PM
-2

the White Feather campaign, where privileged British women shamed men into enlisting in WW1. That's a new one I hadn't heard before. Fucking scumbag bitches who wouldn't fight themselves. Or the thousands of letters from women to their sons and husbands in the civil war, telling them to come home a winner or come home dead. I want a feminist to respond to this one. What extreme fucking disrespect from lazy fucking sluts. Every one of those letter writers should have been drafted and put to the f…
/r/MensRights22/08/11 01:47 PM
3

^ 2 day old account. Are you suggesting that social sciences are all wrong? No he's saying that a lot of bullshit comes out of liberal studies which is 100% true. this kind of BS that they learned in liberal studies
/r/MensRights22/08/11 01:45 PM
3

They weren't oppressed by virtue of their sex, they were oprresed by virtue of their class. Rubbish. Look at conscription. Look at "save the women first"
/r/MensRights22/08/11 01:42 PM
4

Sweden? Rape and anti-male laws. Crippling taxes NO 2nd ammendment Sweden's Free-Speech Charade #2 Etc. Canada/Australia? Canada/Australia Customs "Canada Customs agents to arbitrarily and without regards to the Criminal Code of Canada confiscate the legally owned property of Canadian Citizens, residents and visitors." Canada/Australia is an irrelevant British colony that is completely dependent on trade with the USA to sustain its way of life. The average Canadian family spends close to half of…
/r/MensRights22/08/11 09:30 AM
14

"I would choose a luxury house over a boyfriend that always makes me happy without hesitation," Because men are the problem /feminists
/r/MensRights22/08/11 09:07 AM
1

What country do you want me to compare it to?
/r/MensRights22/08/11 08:59 AM
1

No but people from other nations can hardly point the finger like kuppers about US democracy when other countries are inferior in freedom.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 08:53 AM
3

Except that it contains more than one fallacy as the other responses indicate.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 08:51 AM
1

So no one else chooses freedom?
/r/MensRights22/08/11 08:22 AM
12

and even now men have many advantages both socially, legally, and economically over women, thus this context will not go away What is one from each category?
/r/MensRights22/08/11 07:28 AM
8

So much for Iran being anti-women. Lesbians also have it better than gay males in Iran.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 07:25 AM
1

I didn't know you were "a girl". I think that the fact she was given preferential treatment in the first place should be addressed. That's what I think too and what this whole sub is about.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 07:22 AM
-3

Seriously do you think the "leader of the free world" can be applied to a "mighty" dictatorship that has no domestic freedom?
/r/MensRights22/08/11 07:18 AM
1

Yes it does. They all committed the same crime. You think all of them should walk free despite their criminal convictions?
/r/MensRights22/08/11 07:16 AM
2

That's fine but in the interests of expediency I think either direction is acceptable.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 06:52 AM
0

Freedom Within is the symbol that grants the title, "leader of the free world". Or do you think an anti-freedom authoritarian regime could take the phrase?
/r/MensRights22/08/11 06:50 AM
5

You can be attacked and abused by feminists there but none of them will be banned for breaking their own reasons for banning others.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 06:45 AM
3

Doesn't change that the woman was given special treatment and freed while the two men weren't.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 06:41 AM
3

No it's both. If men can't be given special treatment too, then women must lose it. (See circumcision). It's positive and negative equality.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 06:39 AM
2

I don't think military has anything to do with domestic law.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 06:37 AM
1

Why does the US have to lead?
/r/MensRights22/08/11 06:33 AM
1

What about Europe?
/r/MensRights21/08/11 07:01 PM
3

It would be argued by feminists as 'hate speech'. The EU is already trying to get countries to implement the criminalization of free speech online-See the Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 03:13 PM
2

Very well written.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 03:11 PM
2

You aren't. Keep telling yourself that. You are entitled to look at what you please and when you please it
/r/MensRights21/08/11 01:22 PM
2

It's almost like they are against anarchism and want to kill it off
/r/MensRights21/08/11 06:45 AM
-3

nothing wierd/awful about it. you don't seem to understand the concept and pressures of monogamy in many cultures and countries. I think it's more awful you think either man or woman should go without sex their entire life because they are locked into a marriage for one reason or another. Even Alanna a woman here understands this. You really show why men are often the worst misandrists.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 06:15 AM
1

This is good. I'm impressed by these people.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 12:58 PM
-5

The journalist was uninterested in other discussion points. He is a hack and douche for doing so.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 12:42 PM
0

The journalist was still an asshole.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 12:40 PM
2

'the majority of rape accusations are false!!' the actual position is unpunished false rape accusations are destructive to men and unacceptable for good, healthy male-female sexual relations
/r/MensRights20/08/11 12:27 PM
2

they may try the old you are anti-women trick....respond with you are anti-feminist and pro-women-which is true.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 12:25 PM
1

i think both apply
/r/MensRights20/08/11 06:59 AM
1

yeh i deleted its not the city
/r/MensRights20/08/11 06:58 AM
1

removing the government and rooting out the thousands of authoritarian assholes who run it.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 08:34 PM
-45

if a dude is married to a woman and she doesn't put out-there is a huge problem with her. i don't excuse rape, but taking some liberty in that situation isn't as bad as it's made out to be, seeing as there is or was extraordinary pressure to be monogamous. only a bitch of the highest order would disagree with that. in the same way women locked into marriage with an unloving husband would excuse her to do the same if she could imo
/r/MensRights19/08/11 08:31 PM
1

maybe not :D
/r/MensRights19/08/11 07:40 PM
0

if the article sparks a discussion related to how men would be treated at a pool taking pictures i think that is at very least slightly relevant.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 07:28 PM
2

uhmm... batman attacks men, not women.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 07:24 PM
1

Quit crying about a few disagreements..FFS! Think about it. Can you take real debate? Or do you need everyone to be policed for your own inadequacy when faced with hostile responses? There is very little contextual difference in the two quotes and trying to 'defend' it smacks of trolling yourself. There's hardly any difference. edit: if they are troll spammers i can understand....then it all depends on how much space they take up
/r/MensRights19/08/11 07:23 PM
6

dude, watch how tight your asshole is getting...
/r/MensRights19/08/11 07:16 PM
2

Gotta love the title
/r/MensRights19/08/11 07:14 PM
2

i bet a man would draw more attention...that's where it is about men's issues
/r/MensRights19/08/11 07:13 PM
0

most of the comments are about the girl
/r/MensRights19/08/11 03:52 PM
2

it's not "patriarchy" you fucking idiot.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 03:09 PM
7

^ qft. men are the truly oppressed sex since they are expendable and are treated more harshly by states. time for revolution, folks
/r/MensRights19/08/11 03:08 PM
5

a lot of feminist judges it seems
/r/MensRights19/08/11 02:58 PM
-1

Someone has to do this to a girl and release the pic. See what happens.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 12:32 PM
1

free speech is not about intolerances to another's speech.
/r/MensRights18/08/11 07:43 PM
6

ctrl+f is your new friend.. to others checking the comments: the 'story' here starts half way down the third jump
/r/MensRights18/08/11 12:01 PM
4

great writing.
/r/MensRights18/08/11 11:23 AM
0

the issue is that the media has a very light layer of casual misandry and it's easy to get carried away with stereotypes about men. so when female stereotypes about men are thrown around and for eg. i get shitty about them - it might seem eg. to you like it's the same as the feminists you mentioned it's not quite the same. i would like to qualify that i am not being dismissive of actual female victims and threats.
/r/MensRights18/08/11 10:58 AM
-1

imo you cried too much about men being predators and exaggerated the threat which is how most feminists get away with their sexism. the swear word is an exclamation point
/r/MensRights18/08/11 10:46 AM
0

women stalk men all the time, bitch. women can be as "creepy" as men. also, go fuck yourself for not realizing this. women of a certain age predate on men to steal their sperm.
/r/MensRights18/08/11 10:24 AM
1

WHAT THE FUCK????? fuck these "European"... ..... people
/r/MensRights18/08/11 10:20 AM
2

i like the way you think :p
/r/MensRights16/08/11 11:57 AM
25

As kloo2yoo says here feminists want to be able to personally sign off on the myriad of men's rights issues and thereby maintain control and domination over men politically in the media and legally in the courts.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 01:20 PM
1

everyone objectifies everything and it's perfectly normal
/r/MensRights15/08/11 01:17 PM
1

and everyone objectifies everything and it's perfectly normal
/r/MensRights15/08/11 01:15 PM
6

So we can see Australia can be added to the corrupt list of judges/judicial system all the way up to the Supreme Courts...This is systematic, prolonged misandry in western countries.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 12:59 PM
1

if something is true that doesn't mean it's "hating women"
/r/MensRights15/08/11 12:48 PM
-1

I think you're quite reasonable This is not reasonable: Men have "too many unreasonable expectations" Women have "legitimate legal concerns"
/r/MensRights14/08/11 08:00 AM
-1

no i didn't. that's how it's meant. what backfired was the intelligence of those downmodding me.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 07:59 AM
-7

No I was comparing the legitimate legal to expectations imbalance.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 07:26 AM
1

what would happen?
/r/MensRights14/08/11 07:05 AM
-7

Men have "too many unreasonable expectations on males" Women have "legitimate legal concerns" This is not good faith.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 07:04 AM
1

You are assuming that there would be no mechanism in the absence of social programs.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 07:01 AM
1

It's not logical because anarchism is gender neutral.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 06:58 AM
0

Some people can work on more than one thing at a time. I guess they're smart or productive or something.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 06:52 AM
0

Why is Huffington Post now pushing radical feminism?
/r/MensRights14/08/11 06:48 AM
6

Shouldn't this be an attempted murder charge?
/r/MensRights14/08/11 06:46 AM
-5

Didn't realize how biased you were when writing it, huh? Maybe you did.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 06:40 AM
1

Makes me think of this
/r/MensRights14/08/11 06:39 AM
-14

but until we have a better word, I'll stick with "feminist" There's your problem. You can drop that any time and stop hiding behind the absence of any other labels. OP is still a feminist scumbag: too many unreasonable expectations on males... and no doubt legitimate legal concerns OP is saying: Men have "unreasonable expectations" Women have "legitimate legal concerns" OP is complete feminist scum.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 06:26 AM
3

The great thing about this video is it just unmasks the pure misandry by many women and men in the media and other publishing environments.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 06:25 AM
-1

I'm not sure they can do that. Misogyny in the media is necessary to cancel out the misandry. I would have no problem hearing statements like this about men if there were statements about women frequently appearing in the media. It's all about balancing the current, status quo of misandry
/r/MensRights14/08/11 06:23 AM
0

there are bigger issues for mens rights to deal with. You don't deal with shit one issue at a time, unless you are a retard.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 06:14 AM
5

They also see no difference between hating feminists and hating women.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 06:12 AM
4

Patricia was mistreated by other shelter directors who insisted services should only be for women.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 06:06 AM
0

I think we all know the answer....IQ smash. As a scientific study of IQ it would be very interesting to combine the two-women are equal after all, right feminists?
/r/MensRights12/08/11 06:17 AM
1

I think it can be safely concluded that feminists also hate women.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 06:15 AM
2

they shouldn't be asking a mens rights guy about race anyway
/r/MensRights11/08/11 06:52 PM
2

but I don't think it's unreasonable to put some responsibility on someone who's selling something that makes people who use it less able to behave responsibly. I think it's extremely unreasonable....in fact it deeply offends the entire concept of free agency
/r/MensRights11/08/11 06:27 PM
10

It also endangers those men by encouraging them to not mind their own fucking business.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 05:58 PM
-4

That is so fucked up. Canada is a big source of feminist bullshit. I fucking hate Canada. What is wrong with them? How did Canada become so infected by feminists in everything?
/r/MensRights11/08/11 05:55 PM
3

there's all kind of links: Here, on FGM/C only: "FGM/C and the rights of the child" Because, boys aren't children. the practice compromises the enjoyment of human rights including the right to life, the right to physical integrity, the right to the highest attainable standard of health (including, with maturity, reproductive and sexual health), as well as the right to freedom from physical or mental violence, injury or abuse. According to UN and WHO, this only applies to girls. None of the enume…
/r/MensRights10/08/11 06:38 AM
3

The sexist United Nations thinks so too. Their official documentation gives a set of rights to girls that they don't give to boys.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 05:34 AM
0

I found this Canadian op-ed (Canada is a nasty source of feminism) by a "Professor of Law at University of Ottawa": Consent ruling sends a welcome and clear message If you can fucking believe it, the bitch and the majority judges says this midway through the article then throws concerns away: It's also true that the majority decision says there are no exceptions for husbands and wives or cohabiting couples: Sexually touching your sleeping partner puts you at risk of criminal prosecution. And und…
/r/MensRights10/08/11 05:30 AM
3

unless it's women
/r/MensRights10/08/11 05:26 AM
1

No you aren't. People in the media print feminist "facts" all the time and look how many people believe it without question....these are fucking journalists and editors too. You are wrong.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 05:21 AM
1

I don't see this as trolling...
/r/MensRights08/08/11 06:11 PM
1

The guy has been exposed as the scumbag that he is. That's a good thing, for both his gullible readers and students, and everyone else who has to put up with his bs being published anywhere.
/r/MensRights08/08/11 06:09 PM
1

This is the woman who wrote the article Unfortunately no leg pics -__-
/r/MensRights08/08/11 05:50 PM
2

That's a bit strong I think Only a little too strong.
/r/MensRights08/08/11 05:38 PM
2

it's possible i'll grant that. but unlikely with all the political feminist organizations about
/r/MensRights08/08/11 05:34 PM
2

that is an absolutely commendable smackdown....a great read and you nailed this gender studies 'professor'. How amazingly accurate...
/r/MensRights08/08/11 05:32 PM
2

why can't I quote a point that I do happen to agree with? You can... I was saying the guy does not like men and worships women which means he is being dishonest and it's unhealthy to not realize this. As for gender stereotypes, some yes but certainly not all.
/r/MensRights08/08/11 05:15 PM
3

You don't need to diss all feminists just because some of them don't support gender equality. Most of them don't. Or at least the political agenda is totally against men. . In my friend group, I've always been the one who argued that men CAN in fact be raped, etc. and I HAVE read news articles where men were victimized. A couple of examples don't prove anything. If you had said 50% of what I read it would be an ok claim to make.
/r/MensRights08/08/11 05:13 PM
3

You can also see how all the blogs and media you've read to date never addressed these points/subjects because they are feminist. And feminism is sexism. Your knowledge or rather ignorance to date is a perfect example of that.
/r/MensRights08/08/11 04:21 PM
3

You shouldn't go around reading articles by gender studies hacks like the writer....there are a lot of holes in his article and the scumbag definitely promotes misandry.
/r/MensRights08/08/11 04:19 PM
-1

what a dumb, stupid,piece of shit bitch
/r/MensRights08/08/11 09:43 AM
2

I just don't have the access to evidence supporting generalizing view upon feminist movement. then read the subreddit and you will find the evidence.
/r/MensRights06/08/11 05:37 AM
2

but how could one come to such conclusion from the original God I fucking hate feminism? Easily, since feminism is responsible for this situation.
/r/MensRights06/08/11 05:35 AM
2

You're not going to get support from politicians if supporting you is the same thing as a denouncement of the entire concept of "feminism". Wrong. Politicians live in fear of feminists. And feminism is sexism by definition. However, it would be stupid to assume that you need the endorsement of feminists before receiving political support: Feminists do not sign off on men's rights.
/r/MensRights06/08/11 05:31 AM
-1

In your view, what do men want and deserve in sexual and non-sexual relationships that they don't receive? For a start if men are to be initiators and women like that, they don't need to face potential criminal convictions, automatic arrests and allegations if there is a misunderstanding and the woman is a stupid bitch.
/r/MensRights06/08/11 05:28 AM
1

how is my post hostile? it's set of rhetorical questions. that's it
/r/MensRights06/08/11 05:26 AM
1

That is sexist and racist in itself.
/r/MensRights06/08/11 05:25 AM
3

I think making an organization that isn't for the equitable treatment of people is the moronic concept. Excluding certain groups of people is racist and sexist and leads to an inevitable imbalance.
/r/MensRights06/08/11 05:23 AM
4

Men are some of the most man-hating feminists. PS.I wrote feminist, not woman. Learn to read.
/r/MensRights06/08/11 05:19 AM
7

They control the movement, And 'write' the laws; And are in the media. I hate to burst your bubble, but that's all that counts.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 06:34 PM
3

Apprised of the incident, the former Lieutenant Colonel fired back, calling her “the most vile, unprofessional, and despicable member of the House of Representatives…If you have something to say to me, stop being a coward and say it to my face.” Dude here is a badass and showed this bitch right up for what she is: a cowardly, back-stabbing bitch.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 06:16 PM
3

Feminists should support beat downs since they want equality, right? Or do they want special treatment?
/r/MensRights05/08/11 06:15 PM
9

that have no issue with anonymity for the accused. Shame then that they have absolutely no influence within the feminist movement.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 06:09 PM
3

only about a stupid women. Then that must include yourself since the article also shows what the legal situation is for men accused by women. Did this extremely important point fly over your head or something?
/r/MensRights05/08/11 06:07 PM
6

The National Organization for Women (NOW) is the largest organization of feminist activists in the United States. ... "Feminists are for equality"
/r/MensRights05/08/11 06:04 PM
-1

It doesn't matter how many. The legal system is the point.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 06:00 PM
-2

Fuck off. Are all Australian's so prickly and defensive when confronted about their country? How about you admit Australia is sexist against men? You're just being an aggressive asshole. No. I'm challenging this: It's a bit of a dick move to rip on a country that's closer to what you want Which is strangely defensive and nationalistic. It's not closer at all dumbass....it's exactly the same.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 05:51 PM
1

You mean jews. How is respecting jewish minorities relevant when Australian babies are subject to non-consensual removal of part of their bodies? And why are female babies protected against minorities from Africa? Don't try and defend your country -the situation is sexist.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 05:36 PM
3

Did you read this article?
/r/MensRights05/08/11 05:33 PM
1

being circumcised is the abnormality. But still legal.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 05:22 PM
2

Look at Libya: Women are free to act against Gaddafi and fight in the trenches but they don't. This is free action and choice, nothing is holding them back from sacrificing their lives like the hundreds of young and old men have in Libya.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 05:21 PM
18

A clear result of feminist advocacy: Only for women. If feminism were about equality the program would have been drafted for anyone with the cancer.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 05:17 PM
4

It was posted because it's an example of feminist hypocrisy on equality. Where is the article about MGM? Not one mention? That's what feminist organizations call equality.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 05:15 PM
18

This guy is an asshole. Watch the end. 'This is for women who want a real man who is romantic and makes love slowly'..... etc. The guy is a cunt. The whole premise is about manipulating boys and men to suit women. There is no premise of the assault on male sexuality in the legal system and by the new generation of male and female feminist tools being taught to hate men. There is no premise of what men want and deserve to have in sexual and non-sexual relationships. And you gotta love how the aud…
/r/MensRights05/08/11 05:06 PM
0

God I fucking hate feminism.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 04:57 PM
2

Remember that when you're reading articles like this, the "solution" from politicians is almost always some draconian measure to force some poor schmuck, that is man, to take care of mom. That's usually a politicians solution to any situation or political issue.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 04:32 PM
2

That is pro. "Don't get fucked";"Take the Red Pill" = upmod.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 03:08 PM
4

The figure is probably higher due to underreporting and men being taught by feminists to see female sexual advances as empowerment of women, rather than sexual assault.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 07:46 PM
0

Very true. These kinds of feminists want to smother and protect women by giving them more rights than men.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 01:43 PM
1

Female circumcision does not affect all women either.....would you circumcize any daughters based on this?
/r/MensRights29/07/11 12:37 PM
1

i prefer consistency: either both legal or both illegal. I have no problem with adults deciding to do the procedure.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 08:50 AM
1

I have a citation showing that female circumcision is often fine for women and they can still orgasm from even the "worst" forms.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 08:22 AM
1

Then say "tough shit" to female babies too. Do you agree with that and support female circumcision?
/r/MensRights29/07/11 08:17 AM
1

Both should be legal, or both illegal. Anything else is sexism. The current system is misandry.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 08:15 AM
1

Most female circumcisions in the world are less invasive than male circumcision.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 08:14 AM
0

The judge made a bad ruling. She should know better. Judges are not immune from being called names when they deserve it. That bracketed part is editorializing on my part and is non-serious sideswipe at the judge. Don't make it into something it's not.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 07:43 AM
1

That's not what I said. I said she is likely to be one, because she is likely to be against legalizing religious female circumcision. That should be a protected right as this operation is. Now if you know the judge you can ask if she would flat out endorse religious female circumcision for medical reasons. I bet I'm right.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 07:42 AM
3

No I am advocating that jews peddle male circumcision as a money spinner and hide behind the religious excuse. It is extremely profitable for jewish doctors to take money from the rest of the non-jewish population, as well as their own jewish population. And funds spent on education are superior than the barbarity of taking away a male baby's free choice as a human being to have their body kept intact. Now do any of the studies you know of compare hygeinic preventions like washing etc? No.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 12:08 PM
0

You have to understand how ignorant, uneducated people think. Clearly you don't. And how many of those studies tested against washing the penis, making sure it's clean in the first place? They don't. Hygeine and safe sex education do orders of magnitude more than tenuous, bullshit studies that are flawed.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 11:57 AM
5

Do you support religious female circumcision being legalized?
/r/MensRights28/07/11 11:47 AM
1

Spreading such information puts people at more risk because they believe they will be resistant or immune to HIV if they are circumcised and more likely to forego protections like condoms. Never helped porn stars who get HIV, btw. I think the whole HIV angle is propaganda.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 11:44 AM
10

The Superior Court Judge ruling is incorrect because the procedure doubles as a mutilation operation, just like many other medical operations that can be carried out for dual purposes on babies. Male circumcision is a medical procedure only when there is a medical need for it. Stupid bitch judge is San Francisco Superior Court Judge Loretta Giorgi (no doubt she is a feminist and would not tolerate female circumcision being legalized for any purpose as male circumcision of babies is). Jewish peop…
/r/MensRights28/07/11 11:23 AM
2

it doesn't seem unreasonable to me to say that women have been oppressed on a level men have not. Hmmm let's see..... It was estimated scientifically over 50% of men in history have not passed on their genes, while close to 100% of women have (more or less). Why is this? Because men have been oppressed more: They have been drafted to die since their juvenile years throughout history They have carried out the most dangerous, dirtiest, death-inducing jobs known to mankind, often through force They…
/r/MensRights28/07/11 05:36 AM
1

I never said this poster should not be here, just to watch out for this 'guy'. You were wrong to presume to know my intentions.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 05:17 AM
11

^ mod of r/againstmensrights
/r/MensRights27/07/11 04:25 PM
2

A great article. That is a fine piece of journalism.
/r/MensRights27/07/11 04:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter