bryce1012 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
4	It's ok to be... It's ok to be a man who's never learned that it's ok to be a man.	/r/MensRights	16/08/16 01:19 PM
6	Punching Gloria Steinem: inside the bizarre world of anti-feminist women. How do you make sense of women who think the Hobby Lobby decision is 'great', college rape is 'inflated' and pay gaps don't ex First off, you're looking at this from the wrong direction. This is not a case that Hobby Lobby brought, of their own volition, because they wanted to start imposing a particular policy. It was the US government telling them that they had to do something they didn't want to do, and they believed that this was an infringement of their religious freedom, which was prohibited by the RFRA. The Supreme Court agreed. In your hypothetical, then I guess it depends what you mean by "enacting Sharia law."…	/r/MensRights	08/07/14 04:31 PM
6	on the mens rights SNL sketch: "when you have an attack on any group, and don’t include any actual, you know, jokes, then what you’re left with is not a comedy sketch but merely an act of verbal aggre Think of it this way. The MRAs got roasted last night. My ass, they did. Comparing that sketch to a roast is beyond ridiculous. A roast is about throwing exaggerated, hyperbolic shit that nobody actually believes at someone that you respect and admire. This was throwing out things that a lot of people actually believe about MRAs, from people that have no respect for MRAs. And again -- a roast is funny.	/r/MensRights	10/03/14 05:32 PM
5	AskHamsters goes into epic hamster mode and tries to rationalize why it is that female erotica centers around Red Pill men and rape fantasies. Highlights include "women like being ravished not raped" and "women have fantasies about consensual non-consensual sex but not rape." I came here specifically to see if anyone had pulled that quote out. Goddamn, man. Face. Fucking. Palm.	/r/TheRedPill	08/03/14 03:09 PM
3	"So unless progressives want the MRM to lead the dialogue on these issues, perhaps they should start addressing them more comprehensively and less reactively." The best part of this whole thing is that certain feminist folk over on Twitter are now tearing into the author because they see this article as giving the MRM even a tiny shred of credibility, instead of rejecting it outright as a hate group, etc. Lesson learned for Ms. Matchar, I hope -- only total and complete dismissal and vilification of Men's Rights is acceptable to feminism. Anything less is apparently misogyny.	/r/MensRights	27/02/14 06:18 PM
18	Girls think they are cleverer than boys from age four; teachers' expectations may reinforce gender gap in school performance Shit pay, shit benefits The pay is only terrible if you forget to present your Privilege Card, though. You show them that, and you immediately get a 30% raise! /s	/r/MensRights	20/12/13 10:26 PM
19	What the hell CNN: "How do I raise a boy not to be a rapist?" Why was I not particularly surprised to read this: You may see things that are really messed up, and it'll be a real struggle to know what to do. It could be what a guy is doing to another guy, what a guy is doing to a girl, or a girl is doing to a girl. It could be at school, in the locker room, at a party, or in someone's house. ... Do you think it even occurred to her that there was a possibility missing? Or did she intentionally exclude it? Honestly I'm not sure which is worse.	/r/MensRights	22/03/13 06:14 PM
17	Women accuse man of rape to avoid $13 dollar cab fare. Cab driver catches whole scam on tape. Equal Protection clause of the 14th amendment FYI, this event appears to have occurred in Canada. I'm not sure how far the US Constitution will get you there. ;)	/r/MensRights	01/03/13 04:46 PM
6	Add your comment to site where college administrator said: “There’s really no false accusations. If someone feels they didn’t give consent, then they didn’t give consent.” Reading your comment I suddenly had an image of Butters from the South Park episode "Cartman Sucks" pop into my head. I think his rant there applies equally well here: Butters: I am sick and tired of everyone telling me I'm confused! I wasn't confused until other people started telling me I was! You know what I think? I think maybe you're the ones who are confused! I'm not gonna be confused anymore just 'cause you say I should be.	/r/MensRights	06/02/13 05:54 PM
1	“There is some stunning female chauvinism with regards to how many women think of the forced genital wounding of males as a joke, while the forced genital wounding of females is a heinous crime,” sensitivity = pleasure for the same reason having a condom on leads to less pleasure because its less sensitive. We're lucky that the penis has other areas. When I have a condom on, those nerves are still active and firing and feeling something different than what I feel without a condom. The difference is not, in my opinion, comparable. Yes, compared with uncircumcised men. If a women is giving a blowjob to an uncircumcised man concentrating on the tip will be much more pleasurable than it woul…	/r/MensRights	28/01/13 04:57 PM
1	“There is some stunning female chauvinism with regards to how many women think of the forced genital wounding of males as a joke, while the forced genital wounding of females is a heinous crime,” As I have explained to various other people, we know how our biology works. Less nerves = less sensitivity Let's go back to what you originally said, shall we? circumcised men get little to no pleasure from the head of their penis the way a non-circumcised man will You've made an unsupported jump here, from sensitivity to pleasure. We can certainly agree that less nerves = less sensitivity -- but that does not immediately and inherently mean that less sensitivity = less sexual pleasure (particul…	/r/MensRights	28/01/13 04:29 PM
1	“There is some stunning female chauvinism with regards to how many women think of the forced genital wounding of males as a joke, while the forced genital wounding of females is a heinous crime,” Im circumcised, so I do have some experience OK, fine, so how exactly do you know what it feels like for a guy who isn't cut? Aside from which, you still don't have my penis. It's all well and good for you to say that you have "no feeling" in the head, but I assure you there's still plenty coming through for me. I don't know what it's like to get a blowjob on an uncircumsized penis. I admit that. It might be indescribably better, sure. But I'm not going to make that claim because I simply cannot…	/r/MensRights	28/01/13 02:57 PM
1	“There is some stunning female chauvinism with regards to how many women think of the forced genital wounding of males as a joke, while the forced genital wounding of females is a heinous crime,” Not really, it's more like you've had Coke and he's had Diet Pepsi. There may be an objective "benefit" to the Coke (i.e. sugar -- or in our case, extra nerve endings) but you still can't say for certain that your drink is better than his.	/r/MensRights	28/01/13 05:48 AM
1	“There is some stunning female chauvinism with regards to how many women think of the forced genital wounding of males as a joke, while the forced genital wounding of females is a heinous crime,” In fairness, you don't know what he's missing, either, do you?	/r/MensRights	28/01/13 01:49 AM
1	“There is some stunning female chauvinism with regards to how many women think of the forced genital wounding of males as a joke, while the forced genital wounding of females is a heinous crime,” circumcised men get little to no pleasure from the head of their penis the way a non-circumcised man will Um, circumcised guy here. Where the hell do you get off telling me what sort of pleasure I do or do not get from my penis? Almost makes me glad I was cut, really, the way you say it here. If I were so much more sensitive, like you claim, my average sexual encounter would probably last about 3 seconds.	/r/MensRights	28/01/13 01:44 AM
0	This series of posters has been making its way around the internet, was wondering what /r/mensrights thinks It's all about finding a personal code to keep. No, it's really not a "personal" thing at all. It's about a legal system that can and will destroy your life if you come down on the wrong side of a very poorly defined line.	/r/MensRights	05/12/12 03:57 PM
1	Female teacher puts topless photo on school property, and boys who view it got punished. I meant guessed as in, it was a stupid easy password and they just tried a few obvious possibilities and got lucky. Unlikely, perhaps, but I witnessed exactly this thing happen when I was in school -- although the teacher was right there and playing along (and she changed it before anything was compromised).	/r/MensRights	18/10/12 11:11 PM
5	Female teacher puts topless photo on school property, and boys who view it got punished. If the iPhone was already set up to send photos to iCloud, it's possible the students could have just set up the iPad to sync with those photos. However this would require knowing or guessing the teacher's password. I think it's equally (if not more) likely that the teacher set up PhotoStream on both, and just forgot about it.	/r/MensRights	18/10/12 02:20 PM
9	Female teacher puts topless photo on school property, and boys who view it got punished. I can see PhotoStream doing this, in which case there are two possibilities: She set up photo syncing herself, and forgot about it. The kids literally just pressed the "Photos" button and saw her boobs. She didn't set up photo syncing herself. The kids pressed the "Photos" button and were prompted to set up PhotoStream, or went into the Settings and turned it on. They somehow guessed or brute-forced her AppleID password, at which point synced photos from her phone were downloaded and they saw he…	/r/MensRights	18/10/12 02:19 PM
3	Do you see this as misogyny or young men standing up for their beliefs? I honestly don't know if there's any misogyny in play here -- I've no personal knowledge of the individuals involved and it's entirely possible that they really are just sticking to their (definitely strange) beliefs. I have to give them credit, though, for forfeiting the game instead of trying to bump her off the team so they could play the game. They appear to acknowledge that their beliefs should not be imposed on other people, and I think that's something in this day and age.	/r/MensRights	15/05/12 12:07 AM
7	If we lived in a 'rape culture,' how would the rape claim against a BU athlete be covered? How was it really covered? See, here's the thing, I missed all those other articles in that search (thanks, btw, the n, i, c, a, s, t, r, and o keys are broken on my keyboard) where his accuser is called out for lying and dragging this upright soul's name through the mud. I mean, rape culture, right? There should be dozens of those.	/r/MensRights	20/02/12 07:44 PM
14	If we lived in a 'rape culture,' how would the rape claim against a BU athlete be covered? How was it really covered? Did you even read the article? After the second case of sexual assault in two months it's just terrible that a person did that We have students who have been in situations where they are sexually assaulting others Not "alleged," not "may have." Did. There are plenty of people who are assuming he's guilty and parading that presumptive guilt around. But because this blog post points out that we aren't seeing an overwhelming "blame the victim" mentality that rape culture insists we should be seeing…	/r/MensRights	20/02/12 06:57 PM
6	If we lived in a 'rape culture,' how would the rape claim against a BU athlete be covered? How was it really covered? We assume Mr. Nicastro is innocent because that's the entire foundation of our justice system. You remember that, right? "Innocent until proven guilty"? Nowhere does it say his accuser is lying. It says that no trial has occurred and thus we do not know what happened. Nobody is blaming the accuser -- they're blaming the media and the culture that reinforces presumption of Nicastro's (and indeed, the entire team's) guilt before we know what happened.	/r/MensRights	20/02/12 06:41 PM
1	University of Oregon Law Student run out of school by two women claiming they were mutually drunk and had sex, but couldn't remember. It doesn't matter if he says he consented -- if he was "incapacitated" that consent is invalid by the text of the law. I'll grant you that the young women claim to have been blackout drunk and thus presumably meet any reasonable definition of incapacitated. But I don't feel comfortable saying that he was NOT incapacitated. Which, of course, brings us back to the fact that it's a shitty law.	/r/MensRights	20/02/12 04:43 PM
1	University of Oregon Law Student run out of school by two women claiming they were mutually drunk and had sex, but couldn't remember. How can you know that he was "obviously NOT too drunk to consent" but she obviously was? To claim that he raped her but she did not rape him (given this law) is pretty presumptuous of you.	/r/MensRights	20/02/12 04:28 PM
2	University of Oregon Law Student run out of school by two women claiming they were mutually drunk and had sex, but couldn't remember. sexual intercourse with a person who is incapacitated by drugs or alcohol and thereby incapable of consent is rape in the first degree under Oregon law, Then, he probably did, under the legal definition, rape her in the first degree. Yup. But then she raped him too.	/r/MensRights	20/02/12 04:13 PM
2	With all the false rape accusations flying around, what are some thoughts on this? No.	/r/MensRights	30/01/12 09:51 PM
3	False Rape Conviction: Man spends 17 years in jail. He receives no compensation or apology. There is a vast gulf between "unable to win their court case" and "being convicted of a false accusation and perjury."	/r/MensRights	15/01/12 12:37 AM
28	Hypocritical Feminist (Xpost: r/AdviceAnimals) ...OK? I'm not sure what your point is -- of course self defense is a generally accepted exception for violence. What's not OK is the presumption that all (excuse me, "many") woman-on-man DV falls under that category, and most man-on-woman DV does not. There is plenty of data indicating this is not the case -- but of course that is conveniently ignored by certain feminists who are pushing their particular agenda.	/r/MensRights	29/12/11 05:44 PM
47	Hypocritical Feminist (Xpost: r/AdviceAnimals) It's a fundamental assumption of the Duluth Model which is used as a basis for domestic abuse programs across the country. They make this claim quite explicitly in their FAQ: Many women who do use violence against their male partners are being battered. Their violence is used primarily to respond to and resist the violence used against them.	/r/MensRights	29/12/11 05:34 PM
5	My wife just came back from Child Protective Services mediation training and told me that they teach that the man is ALWAYS the aggressor. Yeah, that last sentence really chaps my hide. It's absolutely disgusting.	/r/MensRights	15/12/11 03:45 AM
3	My wife just came back from Child Protective Services mediation training and told me that they teach that the man is ALWAYS the aggressor. From their FAQ: Battering in same-sex intimate relationships has many of the same characteristics of battering in heterosexual relationships, but happens within the context of the larger societal oppression of same-sex couples. Resources that describe same-sex domestic violence have been developed by specialists in that field such as The Northwest Network of Bi, Trans, Lesbian and Gay Survivors of Abuse, www.nwnetwork.org.	/r/MensRights	14/12/11 11:49 PM
2	My wife just came back from Child Protective Services mediation training and told me that they teach that the man is ALWAYS the aggressor. I agree with your interpretation -- but to be fair, it does explicitly say "many women" and not "all women." It does allow for the possibility (however remote they make it sound) that a woman could be a batterer.	/r/MensRights	14/12/11 11:06 PM
5	My wife just came back from Child Protective Services mediation training and told me that they teach that the man is ALWAYS the aggressor. You're right -- it doesn't say never. But it does say this: When women use violence in an intimate relationship, the circumstances of that violence tends to differ from when men use violence. Men's use of violence against women is learned and reinforced through many social, cultural and institutional experiences. Women’s use of violence does not have the same kind of societal support. Many women who do use violence against their male partners are being battered. Their violence is used primarily …	/r/MensRights	14/12/11 10:56 PM
5	So my gf stopped taking the pill 4-6 months ago, without telling me, and last week found out that she's 17 weeks pregnant. There is no unalienable right to sex without parenthood. ...unless you are a woman. Which I think is the point here.	/r/MensRights	30/11/11 02:04 PM
60	Woman spared jail after groping airline steward's genitals. Part of the defence: "a very attractive young lady acted out of character and committed a very minor offence." This was my favorite part. Passing sentence, Judge Andrew McDowall said [...] "You have now reached that vital stage of acknowledging that you have a problem and also showing a willingness to do something about it. [...] It is quite apparent that you are not a menace to children," and said he hoped she would be allowed to continue to teach despite the sexual assault conviction. So much for "think of the children," huh?	/r/MensRights	28/11/11 04:14 PM
2	Warn men: "if your wife decides to divorce you for another man, there will be well respected Christians lining up to justify her decision and place all of the blame on you" And if you die suddenly, in an accident?	/r/MensRights	09/11/11 06:33 PM
2	Proposed Kansas bill requires a paternity test for ALL births. Speaking as one whose parents are going through a divorce, yes -- my mom did initiate it. But she didn't "blindside" anyone... dad just didn't care anymore. Lies, damned lies, and statistics, my friend.	/r/MensRights	12/02/11 01:47 AM