TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bubbascal Archive

View 1 post and 56 comments by bubbascal on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm sorry, what? She specifically talks about situations in which women win over men, why would you want her to die? Her voice was a bit... off and this is TikTok so that's bad on its own... but the video was fine.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 02:03 AM
1

Sorry for taking so long, was busy and kept forgetting. "MLK is only idolized to keep people focused on the non-effective peaceful methods." So you would rather enforce change via fear and violence than love and understanding. Change that would regress the moment the threat is gone because you failed to change anyone's mind. You're a terrorist and the problem. "There was an enormous amount of rioting and destruction in the 60s." All of which was ineffective. MLK's protests caused meaningful chan…
/r/MensRights13/07/20 12:10 AM
3

Huh. I guess MLK and everything he did didn't happen. And burning black businesses is okay? Plus murder of people, including black people! Wow, what a amazing person you are.
/r/MensRights05/07/20 04:48 AM
7

Any protest attempted would be censored, decried as "anti-women" or strawmanned by the media. Or shut down by feminists. Whichever comes first. Not to mention that Virgina gun owners tried that. They got called terrorists despite no acts of violence being committed.
/r/MensRights05/07/20 04:33 AM
5

They did. But then feminists pull fire alarms on them. And their movements get called "anti-women" for "taking away attention" and "not being inclusive" for only focusing on men's issues.
/r/MensRights05/07/20 04:27 AM
1

Amazing on how you dodged everything they said and gave a non-answer. Being a man means giving your hopes and dreams for a child who will hate you because of inevitable brainwashing and a woman who will never let you see the kid, apparently.
/r/MensRights05/07/20 04:25 AM
1

He doesn't make it sound (or look, with dramatic hands or something) sarcastic so there is no way to tell. Also, this is Poe's law in effect, I think.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 02:26 PM
3

In order to combat these idiots, you need to destroy that statistic as they won't care otherwise. Thankfully, it can be done fairly easily. That stat is created because of crime definitions excluding female rapists. Ergo, women cannot be charged for rape as it defines using a dick. Tell these people that the stats they regurgitate exclude female rapists and female offenders because of the legal definitions of rape and such.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 02:04 AM
1

You're right, but don't say "retarded women", it gives people who don't like this subreddit ammo to think it is anti-women. I've seen men take this as proof too, it's not a female issue.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 06:56 PM
2

"Someone "letting you" do something when you "don't even wait" is not them letting you do anything. A lack of physical resistance is not the same as consent," Someone letting you continue to do something afterwards is a sign of consent, however. Do you believe that women are so weak that they cannot force a man off of them that is not trying to stop them from resisting?
/r/MensRights18/05/20 04:02 AM
2

And, according to the quote scyth mentioned, if that is the true quote, Trump does not mention anything about preventing women from breaking away. Almost as if women are shocked but okay with Trump doing that. Don't get me wrong, forced kissing is a no-no. But do not think that women are so weak and in need of protection that they cannot force a man off of them that isn't trying to stop them from getting out. Or get someone's attention. As people would easily notice this happen and intervene. Th…
/r/MensRights18/05/20 03:59 AM
2

I don't know if this quote is the truth because I don't have a source, only your word. However, even with this, this is not the case. If the woman did not like it, she could resist and scream, no? Trump does not mention preventing them from resisting once this, ultimately reprehensible, situation starts. Also... "And when you’re a star, they let you do it." "Let". Basically exactly what I was talking about. These women are given a chance to resist and say no afterwards, they are choosing not to.…
/r/MensRights18/05/20 03:53 AM
1

So... the woman still consented, then? Can't it be considered sexist to have a problem with women consenting to this? Doesn't that mean women's choices are not being respected?
/r/MensRights18/05/20 03:40 AM
1

Oh, so you, a random person, know what someone else was really saying over the man who was very clearly saying "if they consent"? Nah, you're just a anti-Trumper who is assuming things because you think you know everything about Trump.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 05:02 PM
1

You're referring to "grab em by the pussy", right? Why don't you go and watch the actual clip instead of "trusted, reputable sources" like CNN and Politico to do your thinking for you? People just went and assumed he meant that in a nonconsensual manner.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 05:01 PM
1

This post is referring to "grab em by the pussy" in the last image, right? Wasn't there zero evidence that Trump meant that in a nonconsensual manner and people just assumed he meant nonconsensually?
/r/MensRights17/05/20 04:58 PM
1

I find it very interesting on how you dodged what I wrote about how context matters now. You never even claimed you'd be asking for context if the genders were reversed too. Hey, if you know yourself so well, why not confirm whether you'd be asking for context if the genders were reversed or not? (Not addressing your dodge btw. If you're dodging now, chances are I'm right.)
/r/MensRights27/04/20 02:33 AM
0

Oh, so NOW context matters? If the genders was reversed, you wouldn't being asking for context. You'd be going "that poor woman, she did nothing wrong but stand up for herself!".
/r/MensRights26/04/20 10:36 PM
0

So now context matters? And also, "he must have did something wrong"/"she was justified for some reason" YIKES. Not to mention that this guy apparently has his earbuds in at the start of the video so it is highly possible she had no reason.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 10:34 PM
1

So now context matters? And also, "he must have did something wrong"/"she was justified for some reason" YIKES. Not to mention that this guy apparently has his earbuds in at the start of the video so it is highly possible she had no reason.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 10:34 PM
1

This person is basically saying that standing your ground when people are watching is bad since it just gets you in trouble. And that you need to do it privately. The issue is that men can't do that since the woman can just go claim abuse. This is indeed a world where standing up for yourself is bad, as this person is saying. But men can't do that, it's why women are the privileged class. Not to mention that if this girl is smart, she will only try this out in the open where a bunch of simps wil…
/r/MensRights26/04/20 10:30 PM
2

Yeah, no, it's kinds of stuff like this that gives kids motives strong enough to start shootings. Willing to bet this kid is going to remember this later on down the road. That woman needs to control her temper. He shouldn't have to control his temper, she needs to be punished. And anyone who helped her deserves punishment too.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 10:20 PM
1

You think that if a woman is fat, it isn't a surprise if a man cheats. ("She's fat and vulgar so it's no surprise if he's cheating.") "I wouldn't be surprised if he is cheating because they probably deserve each other. Why the fuck is he so desperate to hide the phone?" How does one call a woman a nasty fatass (in a different reply, I guess?) then proceed to go "If this man has nothing to hide, he has nothing to fear"? It's his personal property, she isn't entitled to it. That's all I need to sa…
/r/MensRights17/04/20 04:18 PM
2

Both of these statements are just so, so wrong. How do you manage to have a anti-women opinion and a feminist opinion at the same damn time? There is no reason to cheat. If you don't like someone, just break up. And hahahahahahaha, no. Willing to bet you wouldn't say this if the SO was male.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 11:07 PM
3

You are right, but this isn't what is happening in the video. It is revealed later that those were the guys parents... so, if we switched the genders, the guy would beat up the parents, and then the girl would be downstairs, saying on how their parents would be staying over. The woman is being portrayed as wrong in the video, and how she was overreacting. Her overreaction is being described as "unnecessary". If anything, this can be a lecture on jumping to conclusions. I suppose you could argue …
/r/MensRights13/04/20 09:33 PM
2

Honestly, I thought it was correct the way it was. And was asking if a man who was wrong about being raped by a woman should face charges for lying. To see if feminists would enforce double standards and saying "yes because it's a man" or something.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 02:04 AM
2

"You can tell by the way you guys talk about women. You can be pro-men without trashing women." Show me some of these replies. Guaranteed that you think logical arguments is "trashing women" or something like that. "while understanding that it’s not the norm" Yeah, no, we're not playing your game. It isn't the norm, but if you make a rape accusation and make it as loud as possible, people will believe you. THAT is the norm. "women face a completely different world than you do." Oh, definitely. O…
/r/MensRights09/04/20 08:07 PM
3

"because the narrative here is that women are awful," Prove it. "and that they lie about their situations to get a huge leg up on men and suppress them." While not all rape accusations are fake, false rape accusations happen much more frequently than you'd think. "The multitude of comments that are highly rated about how awful women" Wanna know what's so ironic about this comment? It's false, but women's subreddits actually write this, along with "men are trash" and "kill all men". The differenc…
/r/MensRights09/04/20 08:02 PM
1

I don't approve of their name... but this is the equivalent of using a anime icon as ammo for a personal attack. Also, did you just assume their gender? How do you know they're a guy? They could be a gal, you don't know that about them at all. Do you think girls can't be into that sort of thing? Or that girls can't make those usernames as a joke? That's a bit misogynist of you, putting women in boxes and gender roles like that.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 07:54 PM
1

Let me break this down: One: This subreddit is mostly focused on men's rights. Of course a lot of posts (not necessarily replies) are going to be focused on this. And I don't want to go "BUT THEY DID IT TOO" but you surely wouldn't aim this criticism at the multiple subreddits for women, right? You wouldn't try to criticize them for not caring if the woman is lying or not, right? "You don’t care about the score of women who are too afraid to speak out," What risk do you face? Like, seriously, wh…
/r/MensRights09/04/20 07:51 PM
2

I guess the hearing where she couldn't keep her story straight and basically admitted to abusing Depp doesn't exist, huh? "Baby bitches" Huh, so getting your finger cut off and abused and your life ruined and NOT being okay with it is being a "baby bitch"? Oh, okay. So if a woman gets her finger cut off, life ruined, and repeatedly abused and isn't okay with it, is she being a "baby bitch" too? Or is that different because reasons?
/r/MensRights09/04/20 07:47 PM
1

Just as a quick FYI that might counter what you're saying: This sub seems to be a lot more tolerant. You can post a lot of opinions in replies and so long as you have a polite tone and aren't rampantly misandrist, you should be fairly fine. Other subreddits? Not so much. Zero tolerance.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 07:44 PM
4

And the maaale feminists will siiiing along! With a bunch of raaaape thooooughts!
/r/MensRights09/04/20 07:37 PM
–

Yeah, I reeeeeally don't like the sound of that. Definitely looks like she doesn't want Depp to be able to counter. Concerning Depp getting his finger cut off, there was text messages mentioned in that article that said that he texted a doctor saying that he cut his own finger? "Mr Wolanski said there were 'diametrically opposed accounts of what happened' in Australia, and submitted that two 'highly damaging' text messages sent by Mr Depp to his personal doctor, Dr David Kipper, later in March 2…
/r/MensRights09/04/20 02:39 PM
–

You mean that Heard is now claiming rape in response to losing the attempt to throw the lawsuit out? Honestly, if that were true, that would be the most obvious, blatant example of how a rape accusation is used when a dishonest woman is losing a argument. You can't easily excuse that.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 07:22 AM
11

What is this disgusting, unoriginal song? "My man ain't shit" Yeah, your man ain't a shitty person, unlike you. :)
/r/MensRights05/04/20 12:30 AM
5

I've seen a lot of pro-male posts from that subreddit recommended to me. This may be the exception, not the norm.
/r/MensRights31/03/20 04:21 PM
5

Exactly. But it's not okay for a woman to go through this because "FGM is wrong". Male circumsicion is morally right and there are looooads of excuses made to defend it.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 12:18 AM
9

It is supposedly to "prevent diseases" but that was proven to be complete BS...
/r/MensRights25/03/20 05:22 PM
18

I dunno. But this seems so stupid, even for feminists, it has to be fake... right?
/r/MensRights15/03/20 05:23 PM
13

Mainstream feminism, as well as feminist academia, has always been about blaming men for women's oppression. Always. Feminism is for equality by advocating for women. Not equality altogether. The label is literally designed for people who think women aren't equal to men (Women aren't equal too, women are privileged) it's a movement focused solely on women. Anyone who says feminists care about men is paying lip service to silence critics.
/r/MensRights14/03/20 04:48 AM
2

Just saying this right now: I wasn't trying to argue with you. I was trying to redirect you to OP. I had not watched the video. But fine, I went and watched it. I'll take you on directly. There was a need for context, because as it is now, "don't compromise" can straight up mean "take what you want by force". She even has a aggressive walk at the end, not a confident one. She deadass looks like she's going to commit assault. And don't backtrack now once you read this btw, you said there was "no …
/r/MensRights12/03/20 03:32 PM
2

OP literally said what the message was. "The video was essentially implying that the "white straight male" didn't promote her simply because she's a woman. There was no context about why she didn't get promoted. Such as "we have a lot of layoffs so we can't promote you"."
/r/MensRights11/03/20 05:52 PM
3

Are you moving the goalposts to fucking reality? Bruh, who CARES if it's irl? It's the message it's sending.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 12:43 AM
2

Comments have been saying there is a subtle dig at men and this wasn't some basic car or basic "female empowerment" ad.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 12:42 AM
16

I think this guy could have said it a bit better, but he is right.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 11:43 PM
6

Fucking pathetic. If you need to mute someone like this, you definitely do care, and you see them as a threat.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 02:41 PM
32

Ever thought that the man literally can't leave? In a lot of America households, women control the purse strings. A man can't check a hotel somewhere without the woman knowing. And shelters for men (this is one reason why they exist I think, to help victims ((aka women)) who don't have control finanically) don't exist.
/r/MensRights01/03/20 03:20 AM
25

Doubt it. Men who are found guilty of rape will most likely get longer sentences than women... And, actually? Might as well say his life is over too. Because rape is seen as even worse of a crime than murder. If you're a man, you will most likely die in prison or get raped repeatedly. Even if you are innocent, you're in for hell. Any women who lie about being raped should feel the same pain as the man. They lied on purpose, it was a clear malicious action. They should feel all of the pain they c…
/r/MensRights25/02/20 09:15 PM
3

I see...
/r/MensRights24/02/20 08:24 PM
0

Lmao this was modded for being a "joke". Autobot thinks the thought of men being assaulted is "a joke" because it "doesn't happen." Wow. Worst bit is, I think there was a question for women just like this prior to this question. It was either a while ago (a few weeks) or a bit earlier. As far as I know, it wasn't modded.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 05:11 PM
2

Is it good that she has the restraining order? Maybe (definitely) I don't understand this, but if it's a piece of paper, couldn't she just rip it? If you can't prove there was a order, wouldn't it be useless?
/r/MensRights23/02/20 05:11 AM
2

Yeah, that's what I meant. Because if this guy was going behind his evil ex's back, then she could have a legit argument.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 04:54 AM
0

I'm amazed that you're being downvoted for this. On this sub too. Guess even mensrights aren't willing to discuss men's rights, huh? Thought I was in the right place, but maybe I'm wrong...
/r/MensRights23/02/20 02:07 AM
7

Of course it's the fucking UK. "Unsafe in my own home" Oh my GOD. "Wave or hello" "No other motivation" Found the girl in high school who bullied autistic kids.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 02:01 AM
2

Was the ex there by any chance? Just asking to be sure, because if she wasn't, you could be arrested... no?
/r/MensRights23/02/20 01:33 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter