TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bubblybooble Archive

View 0 posts and 211 comments by bubblybooble on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

This shit can't be getting upvoted organically. I smell a botnet.
/r/seduction21/01/13 09:03 PM
0

Pretty much everyone, including barely sentient pets.
/r/seduction20/01/13 08:23 PM
2

If she's coming over to your house to spend one on one time with you, she's already DTF. The trick is to get her to that point.
/r/seduction18/01/13 07:20 AM
1

St. Tropez is one of the most expensive places on Earth and native Somalians are typically starvation level poor.
/r/seduction16/01/13 10:36 AM
-18

Cool story bro.
/r/seduction15/01/13 05:56 PM
13

He's a young, handsome, famous, high social status, high social access billionaire. He's a meal ticket and a nightlife entertainment ticket in one.
/r/seduction15/01/13 05:33 PM
1

Work for whom, is the question.
/r/seduction15/01/13 05:17 PM
6

Just the assumption of riches or promise of future riches will work a lot of the time. Look at this girl. She's already visiting the guy in the US a couple of weeks after meeting him. She probably thinks she's halfway to getting her Green Card.
/r/seduction15/01/13 05:10 PM
7

You'll come to realize the only thing that got you laid was the fact that you were different than the local guys. Richer. A Somalian won't do too well at St. Tropez.
/r/seduction15/01/13 04:40 PM
-13

That's your comeback, instead of responding to the actual challenges? That's really weak dude.
/r/seduction07/01/13 05:08 PM
-3

Souls don't exist, you fundie retard.
/r/seduction01/01/13 08:27 PM
2

It is so weird. Why don't you just say let's go home so you can fuck my brains out you big Italian stallion. (You can substitute other nationalities as necessary.)
/r/seduction28/12/12 11:27 PM
3

Yeah, you're going to have to put in 10-100 times more work than a plain looking guy to get anywhere near the same amount of results. But if you put in no work, you'll get no results at all. So there's your motivation for you.
/r/seduction26/12/12 10:02 PM
2

Lynchmobbing external threads, on the other hand, is totes not creepy!
/r/seduction26/12/12 07:19 AM
2

Since you have no credibility anyway, your claims about NLP are worthless.
/r/seduction14/12/12 08:22 PM
8

It comes from all the NLP work done starting in the 1960s. It's called pacing and leading. You synchronize your body language, speech rhythm or talking point with your target's, and then slowly branch out from there to where you want to go, and they will follow you.
/r/seduction14/12/12 12:52 PM
2

I was curious too.
/r/seduction11/12/12 09:55 AM
1

A frat brother athlete bragging about his ability to lay sororisluts is sort of like Friedrich Gauss bragging about his ability to do with simple arithmetic with single digit numbers. Those of us without access to fraternity membership and athletic looks got nothing out of this FR.
/r/seduction01/12/12 12:01 AM
0

This story is the exact opposite of what you describe as awesome. The parent is not encouraging the child to relate to the hero regardless of gender. He's changing the hero's gender to fit with the child's. The child's empathetic abilities are stunted as a result.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 06:58 PM
4

You have a 50% conversion rate and you're whining.
/r/seduction08/11/12 12:34 AM
3

Money certainly isn't irrelevant, if that's what you were trying to say.
/r/seduction28/10/12 10:04 PM
5

It could also have to do with the fact that physically attractive people have secret, heretofore undiscovered hypnotic powers. But there's also this thing called Occam's Razor. Look it up. It's neat.
/r/seduction28/10/12 09:49 PM
6

Tall, fit, symmetrically featured, white men sleep with an overwhelmingly large fraction of women, far more than their fair share. This fact is not consistent with the theory that it just doesn't matter.
/r/seduction28/10/12 06:53 PM
0

Your bullshit is bothering me, but it no longer will, because we're done here.
/r/seduction27/10/12 11:59 PM
1

AFC on, white knight. Attractive females don't feel indebted to anyone. They have no ethics or morals. They've never had to develop them.
/r/seduction27/10/12 11:51 PM
1

That's just white knighting and conditions her to shit on you every chance she gets from day one.
/r/seduction27/10/12 11:44 PM
1

What, exactly, is so risky about mopping up the floor? It's so safe and easy, even women can do it.
/r/seduction27/10/12 11:41 PM
1

Yeah, acting like a white knight will definitely set you apart.
/r/seduction27/10/12 11:30 PM
2

Ryan Fucking Gosling gets paid millions to do one movie. Ryan Fucking Gosling isn't going to clean jack shit for anyone.
/r/seduction27/10/12 10:57 PM
1

I'd hope that a professional janitor wouldn't clean even a small puddle of water until and unless he knows he's getting paid for it -- that's what professionalism entails.
/r/seduction27/10/12 10:56 PM
1

The real joke is that it's no joke.
/r/seduction27/10/12 06:20 PM
2

Just proposition. You're a girl. That's all it takes.
/r/seduction27/10/12 06:17 PM
-7

Women don't get to fuck me. I fuck them.
/r/seduction27/10/12 05:38 PM
-5

Take charge in mopping the floor? "Oh, baby! Dust the coffee table, too! It makes me so hot!"
/r/seduction27/10/12 05:10 PM
0

Women want janitor-minded men? They do, but for friend zone purposes.
/r/seduction27/10/12 01:04 PM
1

Any sort of k-close or make out at the bar, before the ride?
/r/seduction18/10/12 04:03 PM
3

It just sounds like the self confidence you acquired through book smarts is helping you out in other domains as well. Good for you.
/r/seduction12/10/12 03:01 PM
2

If it were a definite conclusion, I'd say so, but those are hard to get in cognitive science. The brain is still too complicated for us to understand completely.
/r/seduction12/10/12 03:00 PM
6

Book smarts and social smarts are dichotomous in most people's minds, and the scientific theory tends to agree.
/r/seduction12/10/12 02:33 PM
10

Inside one of these handbags is a million bucks. Women making millions of dollars would be impossibly difficult to bed. They're after men making billions.
/r/seduction30/09/12 11:32 AM
2

It happens if you go out often enough. Everyone has their off days and off nights, but on the whole, handsome guys will fuck more sluts in a month than most men will fuck in their entire lives.
/r/seduction14/09/12 10:43 AM
2

How could Brad Pitt prove he is a successful guy and sex symbol if stuck in some bar in the middle of nowhere with people that haven't seen his movies? By flashing hundred dollar bills from his vast fortune and by being really, really goodlooking. Frankly, even one of those things is enough. The combination is unbeatable.
/r/seduction12/09/12 07:27 PM
0

Hot girls eat very little to stay the way they are, most of it plant-based. They don't take dumps anywhere near as large as you do, and certainly not as smelly.
/r/seduction12/09/12 03:07 PM
2

Male attraction to females is pragmatic. It's a combination of how physically attractive they are and how easy they are to attain. The latter can be a function of them being attracted to you, or them being already aroused (it doesn't matter by whom, aroused females have high buying temp and will put out to anyone). This is why makeup works. Some forms of makeup imitate youth, other forms of makeup imitate health, and yet others imitate arousal.
/r/seduction09/09/12 07:09 AM
1

You don't know what a woman means, exactly? You're even more ignorant than the typical woman.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 12:27 AM
1

It turns out the answer is no, you're not going to go back to school and will remain ignorant instead. Well, you just can't help some people.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 12:27 AM
1

You should have been given the option to do it after you reached the age of majority / age of consent in your jurisdiction. It sounds like you would have chosen to go ahead with it anyway, but most wouldn't have.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 10:04 AM
2

Nothing is harder than not getting any.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 09:59 AM
0

That's not what the sign says.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 09:36 AM
0

They can buy guns, but they don't have the marksmanship or the discipline to use them accurately or safely. They'll just shoot themselves.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 09:36 AM
1

I have a problem with the extreme amount of ignorance in all of your comments. What are we going to do about that? Would you consider going back to high school and graduating this time?
/r/MensRights01/09/12 09:33 AM
1

Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia are in Asia. The rest are in Europe. (Russia is partly in Europe.) The former are eastern. The latter are western. You're a woman, aren't you?
/r/MensRights01/09/12 09:31 AM
0

You two are simultaneously and equally correct. Note what that says about feminism.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 09:29 AM
0

Girls go out to get laid. They'll deny this to you if they don't want to put out to you. But if you're someone they want to get dicked by, they'll show themselves up as the sluts that they really are. The "I just want to go out to drink and dance a little bit" line is just to weed out the fuglies. You can do that shit at home. You don't need to go out for that.
/r/seduction01/09/12 08:31 AM
-1

SRS has once again served its purpose as a source of quality entertainment. This FR was a fabrication by one of them, hoping to ruffle feathers. They got found out and dealt with in short order. The joke is still there, it's just at their expense now.
/r/seduction26/08/12 01:33 PM
-8

Thank you for the repost. This is clearly an SRS psy-op. Whoever wrote this studied the terminology, but they don't get the logic behind it. They're just concocting a misandristic SRS circlejerk fantasy and decorating it with familiar terms, hoping it will fool someone. It won't fool anyone. P.S. The fantasy really kicks into high gear when the girl claims to be a hacker. Imagine that! P.P.S. This is coming from SRS, a community that is so devoid of computer skills that they failed at establishi…
/r/seduction26/08/12 09:54 AM
2

This must have been an SRS false flag operation, trivially exposed like all the others.
/r/seduction25/08/12 10:45 PM
2

The book is telling you to be handsome, to be attractive, to not be unattractive, to also be a billionaire, and to then go and find an unattractive girl and to lavish her with a ridiculous amount of gifts and attention. Great seduction advice there.
/r/seduction25/08/12 02:58 PM
6

It's completely unrealistic. A male as high-status as Christian Grey would never waste his time on as low-status a female as Anastasia Steele, let alone being monogamous with her. Furthermore, the way he behaves would not be attractive to any females. His wealth would certainly be attractive to a lot of females, and so he might be tolerated and used for a while, but nothing in the book has actual seduction utility.
/r/seduction25/08/12 02:44 PM
2

The queen has never done it, so the comparison is wrong.
/r/seduction24/08/12 08:54 PM
3

Nice to meet you.
/r/seduction24/08/12 05:45 PM
3

I doubt the queen has ever slept with anyone on a first date.
/r/seduction24/08/12 04:36 PM
-3

Your "game" consisted of coming across as a slut and putting out just like the slut that you are. Here's proof that girls don't need "game".
/r/seduction24/08/12 03:15 PM
-2

As far as pickup is concerned, women are still, pretty much, sitting ducks. Women, curiously, haven't taken to this idea of equality so much in contexts where it suits them to be treated differently.
/r/seduction22/08/12 09:47 AM
-4

Everywhere. All over this thread. It reeks. It's disgusting.
/r/seduction21/08/12 11:32 PM
-11

What the fuck is your problem? What are you, some kind of fucking virgin?
/r/seduction21/08/12 11:31 PM
-4

Guys that have misogynistic views and objectify women. You have misandristic views and objectify men.
/r/seduction21/08/12 11:13 PM
-10

This is so stupid. You're a girl. You simply need to be either attractive or down to fuck. That's all it takes. (The combination is rare.)
/r/seduction21/08/12 11:08 PM
1

Drugs. Booze.
/r/seduction19/08/12 03:18 AM
-1

A baseless one, since it addresses nothing that I said in any way, and supports its position with absolutely nothing in the way of evidence, reasoning or citation.
/r/seduction18/08/12 08:55 PM
-1

Yes. Your complete lack of a comeback is exactly that.
/r/seduction18/08/12 08:45 PM
3

This is why you don't take pickup advice from girls. They have no idea what actually works on them, or how, or why. You might as well take parenting advice from children.
/r/seduction18/08/12 02:12 PM
-1

I know how I feel better than you do. Trust me.
/r/seduction08/08/12 06:53 AM
0

What's described would mildly inconvenience me, at worst, and your overuse of adjectives does nothing to change that.
/r/seduction07/08/12 02:44 PM
2

I have no fantasies. If I were offered a job where the only hassle was to put up with advances from women I might not want to sleep with (with the bonus that I'd get a lot of women that I would want to sleep with) I'd sign up in a heartbeat. How hard is it to smile and nod but not allow the interaction to escalate? Seriously?
/r/seduction07/08/12 08:18 AM
30

Oh, poor thing. I can't imagine the pain you must have suffered.
/r/seduction06/08/12 11:23 PM
42

Not in unit volume of pussy, they didn't.
/r/seduction06/08/12 11:16 PM
44

You forgot the most important trick you had up your sleeve. Be hot enough for A&F to want to employ you.
/r/seduction06/08/12 10:57 PM
2

Hitler had principles.
/r/seduction02/08/12 05:54 PM
-4

Women can't fuck. They don't have the equipment. Women can only get fucked.
/r/seduction02/08/12 05:53 PM
1

What were the details of how you two originally met?
/r/seduction02/08/12 07:49 AM
3

It's a Ross Jeffries trick, very ancient. It's a relatively small gesture that psychologically commits her to the sex and almost entirely removes last minute resistance.
/r/seduction02/08/12 07:44 AM
0

No. It says she's not getting anyone, which is literally impossible.
/r/seduction01/08/12 06:17 PM
2

Quality > Quantity > Nothing
/r/seduction01/08/12 06:04 PM
-1

For a woman to get laid is success in the same way that for a rock to stay still is success.
/r/seduction01/08/12 04:14 PM
1

The second meaning arose after constant misuse of the term, sort of like how "literally" has been misused often enough to have become synonymous with its antonym, "figuratively".
/r/seduction27/07/12 03:56 PM
1

Factoid doesn't mean little fact. It means something that has the appearance of a fact but isn't one. Urban legend is a decent synonym.
/r/seduction23/07/12 06:56 AM
0

Would a rock star do that? No. A rock star wouldn't do any of the shit in this subreddit. He'd have groupies coming in from the chimney and the bathroom drain.
/r/seduction09/07/12 07:27 AM
1

I think fame first and fortune second does it for him.
/r/seduction07/07/12 05:13 PM
1

You're probably really really not ugly, which probably really really helps. A lot.
/r/seduction07/07/12 05:08 PM
5

If you're European, you're statistically likely to be a medium sized slut. If you're American, you're statistically likely to be a big slut.
/r/seduction05/07/12 09:03 AM
-2

It should be. Anyone with brute power gets to do whatever the fuck he wants.
/r/seduction03/07/12 11:30 PM
1

If Gaddafi had as much armament as Obama, and vice versa, your comparison would be looking very silly right about now.
/r/seduction03/07/12 07:30 AM
0

No. I don't have time for that shit, and not all my posts have 3 upvotes. People are just calling you out on your bullshit.
/r/seduction03/07/12 07:22 AM
0

I'm more than willing to perform the experiment. Throw a bunch of models into a social function with an ugly but very famous and very rich persona (say, Danny DeVito or Paul Giamatti) and throw another bunch of socioeconomically equivalent models into a social function with a handsome loser. Make sure to signal the loser's socioeconomically lower status with attire, speech patterns and self-description. Record results. What do you think would happen?
/r/seduction03/07/12 05:49 AM
0

You're projecting your frustration at your delusional mindset hitting a hard wall of true facts.
/r/seduction03/07/12 05:42 AM
1

Brad Pitt makes more than all the models in that room put together, plus he's more famous than all of them put together. They'd be competing for access to his resources, not him. If it were just some guy as handsome as Brad Pitt but without the resources, there would be little to no competition.
/r/seduction03/07/12 05:39 AM
-6

Every time you respond to me, you give me the right to a response per traditional debate protocol. Sucks to be you.
/r/seduction03/07/12 05:37 AM
-3

So bug the shit out of them until they fuck you just to get rid of you. Wow, you've got game.
/r/seduction03/07/12 05:28 AM
1

Hot girls don't have to compete. The uggos and fatties, however, do.
/r/seduction03/07/12 05:25 AM
0

She tried to do that, and failed.
/r/seduction03/07/12 02:28 AM
2

She can do whatever she wants, but for her to view it as an achievement is insane.
/r/seduction03/07/12 02:26 AM
0

Every troll says that.
/r/seduction03/07/12 02:25 AM
0

More doublethink. Like I said, it's fascinating to me, but from an academic perspective only. I will indulge it no longer.
/r/seduction03/07/12 02:23 AM
1

You have no idea what I know or don't know. That's just silly.
/r/seduction03/07/12 02:19 AM
-5

The core of your position is null and void. We're done here.
/r/seduction02/07/12 12:23 PM
-5

That's an interesting philosophical discussion, but we know enough about human biological development to confidently say that the eye and the brain develops similarly and reacts similarly to similar wavelengths of light in pretty much everyone, except rare mutations. You accept that women are lacking in logical faculties but still claim that they are just as intelligent as men. That kind of doublethink is fascinating to me. I'd love to study you in a clinical setting.
/r/seduction02/07/12 12:22 PM
-5

All transactional relationships are beholden to the rules of supply and demand. You're full of shit.
/r/seduction02/07/12 12:16 PM
-1

If sex were mutually beneficial to an equivalent degree, the imbalance of supply and demand that I am talking about would never arise. You are wrong.
/r/seduction02/07/12 12:09 PM
-9

What are you even talking about, rape or something? No. Guys are constantly propositioning girls, even uggies like you. It's just easier to say yes and enjoy the benefits that come with sexual relationships with guys (most are willing to finance you in some way) than to say no.
/r/seduction02/07/12 11:55 AM
-4

Everyone lives in the same world regardless of the opinions they hold. Mine happen to be correct, but the sky is the same color for you too, unless you're color blind, that is, which is a very rare thing for a woman to be. In fact, the sky would still be blue in your world even if you were color blind, you'd just be unable to see it.
/r/seduction02/07/12 11:54 AM
-4

You thinking you can get me to back off of speaking the truth by attacking my personality is wrong.
/r/seduction02/07/12 11:44 AM
-7

It doesn't matter how many guys it was. For a guy, laying girls is a success, because that's what's difficult for a guy. For a girl, not letting guys lay her is a success, because that's what's difficult for a girl. Being a whore is the easiest thing in the world for a girl.
/r/seduction02/07/12 11:42 AM
-12

Women are very intelligent Ha!
/r/seduction02/07/12 11:26 AM
-16

I've bagged nearly every guy I've set my eye on since high school You view that as an achievement? Keeping your legs closed more often would be the achievement.
/r/seduction02/07/12 11:24 AM
26

All communication is manipulation. Most of it is amateur and bumbling manipulation that lacks technique, sometimes even direction. But it's still manipulation.
/r/seduction02/07/12 11:20 AM
-4

But no one likes to be told that its all that simple. I'd love nothing more than really hot girls making it just this simple for me. Girls are just fucked in the head.
/r/seduction02/07/12 11:18 AM
1

I mean why do we like a girl over another? Hot. Easy.
/r/seduction02/07/12 11:15 AM
-1

What exactly are you asking?
/r/seduction02/07/12 01:47 AM
-2

No. You should be putting out even without any material expectation in the first place.
/r/seduction02/07/12 12:38 AM
1

Excuse me while I call bullshit.
/r/seduction02/07/12 12:33 AM
-3

I happened to be on the messages page. Beer isn't commensurate with weed. Nor is sex, really.
/r/seduction02/07/12 12:33 AM
-1

Right. You'll leech, but you won't even put out. Even better.
/r/seduction02/07/12 12:30 AM
-1

This FR is.
/r/seduction01/07/12 08:21 PM
-1

The mentality in this sub is to do what you can to increase your odds. This guy didn't do shit and got three girls anyway. He isn't running game. He's just unfairly hot.
/r/seduction01/07/12 08:19 PM
0

No. "I stood next to her and she jumped my bones" three times in a single week isn't an FR, nor is it a reality for 99% of men. The guy is either handsome, famous or rich. In this case, handsome.
/r/seduction01/07/12 05:37 PM
3

That is the case, but women don't pursue men as much as the reverse for a number of reasons, some of which interact.
/r/seduction29/06/12 10:30 PM
2

Smells like a scumbag all the way over the Atlantic. You should use a douche and clean the sand out of your vagina. That's likely to be the cause of the smell.
/r/seduction29/06/12 10:28 PM
9

No. When a guy lays a girl, both sides get the same thing out of it: sexual pleasure. It's a symbiotic exchange.
/r/seduction29/06/12 10:16 PM
15

Won't go home with a guy unless it's for weed You're a bitch and a user. Doesn't matter how hot you are. Next.
/r/seduction29/06/12 10:10 PM
-8

Girls want sex, just not with you. Your job is to trick them into feeling otherwise for long enough to get your cock into them. The illusion won't last. So you'll have to work quickly. Heat the iron as hot as it will go and strike as soon as it's hot enough.
/r/seduction29/06/12 10:06 PM
1

No, the cool guy archetype isn't happy. He's aloof, cocky and bordering on abusive.
/r/seduction28/06/12 08:04 PM
1

I said the effectiveness of personal authenticity is overestimated. In other words, personal authenticity isn't worth shit. Wow, your reading comprehension sucks.
/r/seduction28/06/12 08:03 PM
1

Yes. You underestimate the importance of physical attractiveness, as well as overestimating the effectiveness of personal authenticity.
/r/seduction28/06/12 03:52 PM
1

You're giving wrong advice based on wrong claims.
/r/seduction28/06/12 03:42 PM
1

I seriously doubt that your idea of a male of average attractiveness matches the statistical representation thereof. You probably have a much more attractive man in mind.
/r/seduction28/06/12 03:36 PM
1

Yeah, a margin of a few thousand percent.
/r/seduction28/06/12 02:48 PM
3

You must simply be very attractive. There isn't enough game in this report to pick up a woman of this caliber.
/r/seduction28/06/12 02:42 PM
1

I'm sure the slimmer, fitter phonies do better with the girls.
/r/seduction28/06/12 02:27 PM
1

"Be a better you" is a variation on "be yourself" and still misleading. You're not being you. You're being what girls will put out to.
/r/seduction28/06/12 02:13 PM
1

I've improved myself my whole life in areas that matter to me. Girls don't respond to improvement as a general concept. It has to be improvement in areas that they themselves value.
/r/seduction28/06/12 07:50 AM
1

No, I actually detest the archetype that girls put out to. I'd never adopt any of his qualities if left to my own devices. But I have to imitate him to get what I want.
/r/seduction28/06/12 07:48 AM
2

Be yourself is Disney quality seduction advice. If it worked, we wouldn't need seduction advice.
/r/seduction28/06/12 07:46 AM
0

This is such bullshit. You can't be anything but yourself, by definition. The problem is that girls don't want you. They want a very specific kind of guy that behaves in very specific kinds of ways. So you learn to imitate that archetype and lie to yourself and tell yourself that it's still you but a different you.
/r/seduction28/06/12 12:26 AM
1

Right. That's the point.
/r/seduction27/06/12 07:41 PM
-1

She might be wanting an Eiffel Tower, so to speak.
/r/seduction27/06/12 12:26 PM
-1

If they put out, they're interested. Hope this helps!
/r/seduction27/06/12 12:19 PM
-8

"I never do that." It simply means she's a fucking whore, but she's trying to desperately raise her value to that of a non-whore, post-bang.
/r/seduction26/06/12 09:02 AM
0

What's easier than getting someone to take a photo with you? Just say you're from out of town and want a memento. But good luck getting someone to buy you a drink or kiss you if you're an unattractive guy. Ain't gonna happen.
/r/seduction22/06/12 08:08 PM
-1

Yeah, just rape her. What's the worst that can happen? Life in prison without parole. No big deal.
/r/seduction22/06/12 08:02 PM
-1

You're still ambigous with your latest wording. Social anxiety also qualifies as an "unreasonable measure of confidence in yourself". It happens to be unreasonably low. You have to specify unreasonably high.
/r/seduction21/06/12 09:01 PM
11

"Less than" qualifies "reasonable", not "confidence". It's an awkward construction. You need to have a firm grip on grammar to grasp it. "Unreasonably high level of confidence" would parse more easily for more people.
/r/seduction21/06/12 03:40 PM
2

Women only want you when other women want you, regardless of what objectively valuable qualities you already had and continue to have. If this isn't proof that women are fucked in the head, then nothing is.
/r/seduction21/06/12 09:42 AM
-3

Girls are fucked in the head. If you give girls an option, they'll choose the one that will upset you, just because they can. So you don't give them that option. You give them the phone and frame the number input as a direction, a command. Jolted out of their script, they comply.
/r/seduction20/06/12 01:42 PM
26

So, basically, be handsome, be attractive and don't be unattractive. The rest is really details. You could bang hoes on the hood of your car if you're hot enough. They'll cook for you. They'll do anything for you.
/r/seduction19/06/12 11:35 PM
3

Thank you for the TL;DW.
/r/seduction19/06/12 11:01 AM
2

I was at an NLP workshop once delivered by a very attractive woman. Not seduction oriented, just regular NLP. She had us go through some exercises, culminating in one where she tried to discover our dominant sense. She figured my dominant sense was touch. On our way out, she shook everyone's hand, but for me, she made a point of reaching out with her hand in a submissive position (palm turned up at a slightly tilted angle), holding tight once contact was made, and then putting her other hand on …
/r/seduction19/06/12 11:00 AM
2

If I do it to ten girls, nine of them think it was odd, and I get to fuck only one of them, I'm still up one f-close.
/r/seduction19/06/12 10:51 AM
2

Dude, she opened you a bunch of times. Seriously.
/r/seduction17/06/12 12:08 AM
1

If she's already attracted to you, it literally doesn't matter how you approach as long as you approach. Most of us don't have the advantage of prequalification.
/r/seduction16/06/12 11:56 PM
2

You failed the LMR over text but did well otherwise. Good job.
/r/seduction16/06/12 05:39 AM
3

There's a finite supply of attractive women. Every time you're fucking one of them, the rest of manhood is losing out. Gaming is a zero-sum game. Embrace it.
/r/seduction15/06/12 01:53 PM
1

Good luck finding an alternative.
/r/seduction14/06/12 07:50 AM
1

A lot more girls are with abusers. Girl logic isn't about what's healthy or reasonable. Girl logic is fucked up. That's pretty much the first axiom of seduction. Don't try to explain it, just work with it.
/r/seduction14/06/12 12:33 AM
2

Girls are fucked up in such a way that a certain portion of them will put out to the second car (and its guy equivalent). As long as you stand out somehow, as long as you're receiving attention, some fraction of girls will want to lay claim to the object of that attention. What the object is almost doesn't matter. It's the attention that matters.
/r/seduction13/06/12 01:45 PM
2

Religion doesn't stop people from acting like assholes because it makes them think that they'll be able to enjoy eternal pleasure by simply having the right kind of invisible friends, all else be damned.
/r/seduction08/06/12 12:31 PM
-1

The lint in my belly button has more game than was demonstrated in this FR. It's just good looks. The girls picked him. He would have gotten laid with them in any case, short of insulting their mothers (and possibly even afterwards).
/r/seduction05/06/12 07:30 AM
2

A contributing factor of 99%.
/r/seduction04/06/12 06:45 AM
0

Being as hot as he is, the OP pretty much doesn't have to worry about shit.
/r/seduction04/06/12 06:38 AM
15

They'd already decided to do him. All he did was say hello and ride the wave from then on. He must be pretty hot if an 8 and a 9 picked him with virtually zero work on his part. Doesn't help anyone who's not hot.
/r/seduction03/06/12 08:27 PM
60

She picked you up.
/r/seduction03/06/12 04:57 PM
0

I've answered your question twice by now. I'm not going to repeat myself a third time. I'm sorry if you don't like the answer.
/r/seduction31/05/12 11:40 AM
-6

Tony D is far from the best player out there. I'm talking about gods like Ross Jeffries. Today's players, sadly, haven't even heard of the guy. But it doesn't matter. The lesson remains the same. Girls are doing their job, you do yours.
/r/seduction31/05/12 11:37 AM
-6

The tighter your game gets, the lower the percentage of flakes and rejections. A good enough player will convert close to all of his approaches. Casanova used to lay nuns at the monastery back in his teens. Nuns! If he could lay nuns, you should be able to lay regular whores. It's nobody's fault but your own. It's girls' job to make it hard for you to fuck them. It's your job to get better at the game. Everybody should do their job.
/r/seduction31/05/12 11:23 AM
1

After reading this subthread, there's nothing anybody can say to either change or obscure the fact that you are nothing but a user.
/r/seduction30/05/12 02:00 PM
1

There's nothing new to add. You got caught red-handed.
/r/seduction29/05/12 09:30 PM
1

I'm not assuming anything. Your own statement is proof of your user nature.
/r/seduction29/05/12 07:01 PM
1

No, that's not how cause and effect works. It works in reverse of what you just claimed. You're already a user by nature. That's why you expect people to do things for you without you doing anything for them.
/r/seduction29/05/12 05:15 PM
1

You are a user, as proven by what you said. There's no backpedaling possible at this point.
/r/seduction29/05/12 02:25 PM
2

If the content is just some of your blog posts, weren't you already giving it all away for free?
/r/seduction29/05/12 12:18 PM
0

Show me the female programmers, mathematicians, physicists, inventors. They don't exist. They don't exist for a reason.
/r/seduction28/05/12 10:38 PM
0

You're claiming something like a -> c b -> c : a <-> b Yeah. That's not how logic works. Also, I'm talking about programming seminars and tabletop gaming sessions, which obviously require multiple participants. Obviously nobody of sound mind expects girls to fall into their lap while they're sitting alone at home. Females are just fucking dumb and you're in denial about that. Hope that works out for you.
/r/seduction28/05/12 06:48 PM
-1

There's nothing inherently masculine about using your fucking brains (it doesn't entail physical power, agression, or even physical risk) except for the fact that females are fucking dumb.
/r/seduction28/05/12 06:45 PM
0

The sour grapes come later. Males start out living life on their own terms, then look around disappointed at the lack of females — while other males living life on different (but still their own) terms get a disproportionate amount of females.
/r/seduction28/05/12 05:07 PM
0

I don't need to do shit. The original advice was to live life on your own terms. A guy can do exactly that and not get any pussy because females are dumb fucking cunts and their paths don't cross with intellectually stimulating activities of any kind. You have to play to their idiosyncracies to get some. It's a waste of fucking time, but what are you going to do?
/r/seduction28/05/12 04:43 PM
0

Activities are not satisfying across a single axis. Sex is hormonally satisfying. Programming is intellectually satisfying. A classical music concert might be aurally satisfying. Which one is more satisfying? That's like asking whether chocolate, cheese fondue or steak is more delicious.
/r/seduction28/05/12 04:20 PM
2

If I had the body of a male stripper, I could easily get all the pussy that a male stripper gets without having to work that specific job. When you're that hot, you can just show up at parties, bars and clubs and whores literally throw themselves at you. Then you just take a couple of them by the hand and go home.
/r/seduction28/05/12 01:05 PM
-1

Nope. The more gays there are, the more girls there are left over for me. I wish all men were gay.
/r/seduction28/05/12 08:48 AM
1

The hammer is my penis.
/r/seduction28/05/12 08:43 AM
-2

Why aren't they there? Girls are just stupid and don't take to activities that require abstract reasoning.
/r/seduction28/05/12 08:41 AM
-13

You're gay right.
/r/seduction27/05/12 09:18 PM
0

you've got to establish social proof Not a pre-req. It's a tool. There are many tools, many styles. The only thing they have in common is their objective of fucking hot girls.
/r/seduction27/05/12 07:15 PM
4

Seduction is about fucking hot girls. Go to all the programming seminars and tabletop roleplaying sessions you want, you won't find any hot girls there. We've all lived our lives on our own terms. It hasn't worked for us. That's why we're here.
/r/seduction27/05/12 06:02 PM
3

I consider a guy nice if he is nice without expecting anything in return. In other words, you're a user. Next.
/r/seduction25/05/12 03:35 PM
-12

There we go with the backpedaling.
/r/seduction23/05/12 09:30 PM
4

You pretty much don't need to, because you already get the results you desire without having to expend energy and expose yourself to legal liability. But you can throw it down, if it comes down to it. And the rest of us can't really counter such size. We'd have to be very, very well trained.
/r/seduction23/05/12 09:26 PM
-10

We're all in this subreddit because we have too many guy friends and not enough girlfriends. One doesn't translate to the other.
/r/seduction23/05/12 09:23 PM
10

Your height and build is probably enough to take down even trained men. That's why you have confidence and that's why girls think you're alpha. That doesn't help the rest of us.
/r/seduction23/05/12 08:47 PM
-12

more guy friends equals more lady friends Ha! That's funny!
/r/seduction23/05/12 08:35 PM
20

“Asking a woman's advice on seduction is like asking a child's advice on parenting.” — Whisper from reddit.com
/r/seduction23/05/12 11:55 AM
1

Sure. But her sluttitude is defined based on her sexual history.
/r/seduction22/05/12 10:23 PM
1

Her sexual history says otherwise.
/r/seduction22/05/12 10:06 PM
-1

Sounds like she's a slut who'll sleep with anyone and you just put yourself in her path often enough. You'll have to do better than one girl every three years. But it's a start.
/r/seduction22/05/12 01:34 PM
2

This sort of attitude infuriates me so much. You get the results you want every time you put in the work, but you don't even want to put in the work. Girl World Problems.
/r/seduction20/05/12 08:25 AM
1

I'm saying that's the id's most primal desire, and if you let the id take over your behavior, the machinations of modern society will do you in.
/r/seduction17/05/12 09:11 PM
-6

How stupid would a girl have to be to actually buy into that Very stupid. Thankfully, being very stupid comes naturally to most girls.
/r/seduction17/05/12 01:41 PM
1

a lot of what a woman wants is a guy who is genuine No, that's what they tell you they want. Big difference. Women are liars to their core. They won't even notice they're doing it. They'll even lie to themselves. But it's a lie.
/r/seduction17/05/12 12:14 PM
1

The ego is your desires (your id) tempered by logic and memory of previous experience (the superego). So there is no true self or inner self or any shit like that. Your current ego is who you are. That is your self, your true self, your inner self and any other kind of self. It's all you have. If it doesn't work, you have to change it to become someone else, a new your self. If we ignored the ego and went with the id every time, like you suggest, we'd rape every goddamn whore we see. That's not …
/r/seduction17/05/12 10:46 AM
2

If you pretend to be a douchebag or pretend to be a player, a girl can sense that incongruent vibe and be turned off. You'll still get a lot more pussy than a congruent geek, because geek hangouts and interests just don't attract girls. Be as passionate as you want about assembly programming, for example. See where it gets you. A large part of this game is realizing that you are enough. You are enough to have a perfect 10. Even the chodliest chode is enough. If this were the case, seduction trai…
/r/seduction17/05/12 10:32 AM
1

No, what they mean is: "Be honest about yourself so I spend the least amount of time and energy possible to write you off. Don't make me have to figure out whether you're actually alpha or beta. I have very little brains as it is, so don't make me overwork it." That's what they mean.
/r/seduction17/05/12 10:20 AM
1

No, it's the fame, and the millions of dollars, and also the Greek god tier good looks. Danny DeVito is a character actor, too. He even has two out of the trifecta — he's famous and he has millions of dollars. But he lacks the good looks, and so he'll pull nowhere near what Brad Pitt pulls. It's just fact. Deal with it.
/r/seduction17/05/12 10:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter