~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | When does "shit testing" become domestic violence?okay wow. so, "shit testing" is so stupid and wrong. why tf would you do it. this would hurt the person being "tested" mentally, but that does not then excuse violent actions taken after if the "tester" takes it too far. shit testing is literally dipping your toe in the water to see if/how your partner would react. NOT HEALTHY for either party. if someone doesn't want to have sex because they don't want to, then don't. but if that person is only doing it for this stupid "shit test", and expectin… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/10/21 11:41 AM |
| 2 | "Duty BJs" sounds deragotaryi agree with you completely. calling something that should be consensual and enjoying to both parties should be that. not called a duty, a hassle or something someone is meant/obligated to do. it does sound derogatory, though the actual act or feeling behind isn't. i think the name needs to change. if someone wants to give their partner head, even if they don't feel like receiving, that is healthy. what isn't healthy is calling it a "duty". the word is just usually associated with unwanted or "i… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/10/21 09:06 AM |
| 0 | The "asshole" debate boils down to guys who act like they're better than you when they're notno. what people see is behaviour and take it for behaviour. if a rich person were to introduce themselves how they usually act (as you say "cool and generous"), and treats the person they're interested in as a human, even if they reveal their status, there is a higher chance of attraction being formed. if someone was a dick to you, would your first reaction be "oh, they're an asshole, so that means they're rich", i hope not, it would be more like "you're an asshole." i seriously don't know what … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/10/21 08:38 AM |
| 2 | The "asshole" debate boils down to guys who act like they're better than you when they're notthere is a difference between understanding social cues, obvious or subtle signs/hints that will cause action, and not realising when a person is putting on a facade and/or being blatantly lied to. yes, studies have shown that women are generally better at social cognition, though it doesn't apply to everyone. some people are good at lying, covering up lies or distracting from their lies. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 06/10/21 08:29 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter