TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

built_to_elvis Archive

View 0 posts and 74 comments by built_to_elvis on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Wait, wait, first someone had to remind you the story happened in the first place then all of a sudden it's your "third craziest" experience? Which one is it?
/r/TheRedPill15/11/13 02:46 AM
9

Surely she speaks for every woman?
/r/MensRights24/04/13 12:44 PM
1

This is true. But why do we need a cartoon to rally around a problem that's so obvious. Can't a joke just be a joke?
/r/MensRights20/12/12 04:15 AM
1

That was just an example of a larger point that men walking outside with their children are seen as suspicious, etc. Except if you look at the quote I included from above that's not the point people were focusing on. If people want to make a point about the double standard that exists when a man is seen walking around with children as compared to women that's fine if that's indeed what you are arguing. Instead it seemed people were looking to get offended by the cartoon in order to make an unrel…
/r/MensRights20/12/12 12:19 AM
1

So men shouldn't be seen as creepy for sharing nude photos of their children with strangers? And yes I view women who do this to be creepy as well. Again, is this something that men what to be involved with? Why would men want to do this? Can you explain why because I don't understand.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 11:27 PM
1

Because a joke about naked photos should necessarily result in a referendum on men being viewed as pedophiles.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 10:43 PM
1

Male genitalia are laughable, unless adult and erect. A boy has no need for privacy, what does he have to hide? Female genitalia are only to be seen by parents and lovers. A woman can innocently enjoy seeing a child's nude body; a man is predatory and cannot be trusted in this respect. A woman who lets her child be seen naked does so with no ill intent - the child was part of her body once, right? A man who lets his child been seen naked is a pervert - he does this only with ill intent. From abo…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 10:30 PM
1

A double standard is an "objective" court system that is ostensibly concerned with "the best interests of the child" but consistently awards custody of that child to the mother. Different reactions to the way people respond to people showing pictures to other people on a bus, is this a double standard worth getting upset over? The comic was posted in this subreddit, a forum to discuss men's rights and issues. When something is posted here I figure it touches on rights and issues that concern men…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 10:20 PM
1

Oh. You mean that a woman being able to show naked pics of their kids and men not being able to do the same was just a joke and shouldn't be taken as some kind of double standard/right men are being deprived of? Is that what you're saying?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 09:30 PM
1

But is this really a thing to get upset about? I'm far more concerned about the woeful state of child custody rulings not whether someone freaks out about a man showing naked pics of his kids to strangers. It the long run it not really an issue that matters because it's such a ridiculous thing to fight over.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 08:11 PM
1

So then what's the double standard if the only people who show naked pics of their kids to other people are women?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 03:49 PM
1

Exactly. Have you ever seen men do that, like ever?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 05:30 AM
1

But women do that more then men, which is why I am confused. I mean why would a man want to do that?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 04:43 AM
6

Welp, she's dead so I suppose she paid the ultimate price.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 04:30 AM
1

How do you know that is the point of the comic? When I read it I just thought of it as a woman that didn't know not to share naked photos of their children in public (as most women do) because they are more social than men and don't know any better than to keep private things private, so when a man does it it is strange because that is not something that happens often because they know better than to do something like that. I don't really see where you find argument about which gender's genitals…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 04:24 AM
-1

I can perhaps see the 1st part of your argument because I've actually witnessed more women sharing photos of their naked children with complete strangers than I have men. Maybe men are more considerate of their children's privacy so they know better than to show that perverted shit in public? The second part I don't really know what you're driving at.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 04:05 AM
-3

But no one has explained what that double standard is and why it matters that it is a double standard! That's what I'm trying to figure out here.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 03:47 AM
-4

Yes. But I figured it was common knowledge that people shouldn't show their children's genitals to strangers via photograph wether they be male/female and/or whether their child be male/female. Are people actually fighting for this privilege like they are fighting for custody over their kids?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 03:28 AM
-8

What is the double standard?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 01:33 AM
16

So is the argument here that I should be able to show my daughter's cooz on the bus without fear? To be honest both scenarios presented in the comic are disturbing.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 01:19 AM
4

If they were doing the same work either that dude is seriously unlucky or that chick is incredibly lucky.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 01:16 AM
1

A tired joke from a god awful parody twitter account. Yep that's doing a lot to further our cause as serious. Edit for clarity: being hit by someone is not an equal right as rights are defined. In the context this tweet is presented it would be like be saying: I want equal rights to the custody of my child, but you can't get me in trouble if I hit you.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 11:24 PM
1

Who gives a flying fuck about women's field hockey?
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:32 PM
1

Can you outline some of the points for me? It's finals and I probably don't have time to watch the thing.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 08:29 PM
1

So how does one balance the need to be masculine while at the same time setting up male on male support structures so that men don't have to feel like they have nowhere to turn if things aren't going so well for them? Can a man's innate "distrust" (or whatever you want to term it) of opening up to other men be overcome so that we don't have to continue walking around, pretending everything is fine, when it really isn't? If so how? If not why not?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 07:06 PM
1

Men are to blame as well because we sit back and take it or pretend its not our problem, this is probably because we dont have an innate bias toward our own gender like women do. Is this a good or bad thing? Would it be better if men did have a bias toward their own gender, or if women did not? I think it's almost impossible to change these biases because the lizard parts of our brains won't allow for it. Because you do have a point. Many women want men to be sensitive to their issues but also w…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 05:12 PM
1

Look, I'm not going to continue a conversation if all you're going to do is claim how many more "points" men score on the awfulness scale. I have not argued that women have it "worse" than men anywhere it my argument. I am instead pointing out that men's and women's problems aren't mutually exclusive, but you apparently don't want to have a conversation about that for some reason.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:16 PM
2

Eating disorders, self harm. At least be fair when you make these points. I'm not going to deny that men face a double standard similar to how you describe it, but to try and lay those problems squarely at women's feet is disingenuous and intellectually dishonest. I blame a society that is so balls to the wall insane about doing anything in order to become rich and successful at the expense of nearly everything else. That and advertising. Watching that one Klondike Bar commercial where the guy i…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:50 PM
-3

Yes, and men want women to funny, but not too funny. Submissive, but not too submissive, etc. Women aren't the only ones with double standards.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:29 PM
0

Yes, and men want women to funny, but not too funny. Submissive, but not too submissive, etc. Women aren't the only ones with double standards.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:29 PM
5

That's exactly what the chart is arguing and it's exactly why I'm calling it misleading because any single household is (regardless of who is the primary custodian) likely less stable than a married household.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:26 PM
2

Ah.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:32 AM
1

heterosexual women are the only of the two that will be partners. I don't understand what this means.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:24 AM
2

Streeeeeeeeetch.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:22 AM
15

I feel like that single mother stat is also misleading. Children from stable households are probably going to be better off no matter who the primary caregiver is in a single parent household.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:19 AM
4

And in my experience I've constantly been blamed for not opening up.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:03 AM
1

?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:02 AM
2

How so?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 05:31 AM
5

To be fair there are a large number of women who are angry at men for being closed off with their feelings.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 05:20 AM
-4

How the courts explain it: "In the best interests of the child." How it is in reality: "In the best interests of the woman." Do you have facts and statistics to back this up, or are you just posturing? I want to like the subreddit, I want to see it tackling actual issues rather than becoming comment fodder for SRS, which, without context or actual facts, this comment has in spades.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:38 AM
1

This is the problem with judges. Some decide to ignore the law entirely, if they still have a seat on the bench I would be surprised.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:36 AM
13

Right. And I believe men are largely driving this problem. I am a dude btw.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:18 AM
26

I blame other men for this problem.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:04 AM
2

Man if it weren't for that whole divorce thing you'd have a pretty sweet life.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 08:38 PM
1

Reinvested in what? Did you do the investing or was it done through a broker?
/r/MensRights09/12/12 08:22 PM
1

I read most of your comments and all I can tell is that you have 1.6m as a result of investments. What kind of investments, how did you make them, how much did you start with? Hell, I'm surprised your wife's lawyer isn't trying to impute income to you as a financial strategist of some kind.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 08:11 PM
1

How did you accumulate 1.6 million in savings? If it was through work, court/lawyers might not be off base imputing income to you.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 07:24 PM
3

It's where you put all the drunk Irish people you don't want walking the streets.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 06:34 PM
2

I think an "opt out" law would require more from men than the decision itself. First off, "opt out" would require surrendering parental rights, which you don't mention. To be fair I don't think the surrendering of parental rights to a child that doesn't exist yet is quite the same as having an abortion. I can see how it would be difficult for a father to give up all of his rights to a child he has established a relationship with, but I'm finding it difficult to equate a dad deciding he won't hav…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:26 PM
1

It's impossible to maintain the same standard of living post-separation because the costs are much higher with two households. Yes that's true, but the courts try and do their best to put the parties in that kind of position. The second part is more difficult. Like I said in my previous comment, a court is not likely to modify support if mom is using it inappropriately because of the difficulty in trying to track how the money is used. If mom was using the money in such a way that would harmful …
/r/MensRights27/11/12 08:24 PM
2

I had a longer response but because I am a gigantic idiot I accidentally deleted it, so in that case I will just address the philosophical unfairness I feel is inherently attached to an “opt out” provision. Many people here argue that an “opt out” provision is a way to give men an equal choice in whether a not they want to become a parent. The problem with this line of thinking is that the choices being made are not equal. From a man's perspective an “opt out” provision provides him two choices …
/r/MensRights27/11/12 06:23 PM
0

That's nonsense because two households is far more expensive than the previous one. I'm not quite sure what you mean by this. When parents share joint physical custody its more likely that both parents work and thus have less of a need for child support than in a case where only one parent has physical custody of the child. Courts typically require a non-custodial parent to pay child support because with no child living with them they are not incurring any expenses that they otherwise would be i…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 04:35 PM
2

For example, the state could give men the right to "veto" the abortion, the right to notice of the abortion, or the right to opt out of child support prior to the birth of the child. The first and most likely the second option run afoul of Constitutional protections since Planned Parenthood v. Casey was decided. An option for a man to outright deny a woman the ability to have an abortion is exactly the kind of "undue burden" that Casey sought to eliminate. A court would probably also view the no…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 04:23 PM
1

My fundamental problem with child support is while it's "child" support there is no real way of tracking that the money is actually spent on the child. That's sort of a difficult area because "child support" encompasses a much larger area than just food and clothing for a child. Something like cable television could be characterized as child support if the child grew up in a house with cable television prior to the divorce. When couples get divorced the court tries to set them in a position as i…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 04:01 PM
0

Point being, if both parents have equal custody the child will get everything he/she needs to thrive without the need for child support. I think that's more true in the case of parents with equal residential custody of their children which is a rare occurrence. In that case the child spends equal time with both parents and thus has less of a need for child support to be paid to the mother. In cases where both parents have equal legal custody but mother retains physical custody of the child there…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 03:38 PM
1

Do you mean equal residential custody with the child moving from the father's house to the mother's house during the week, or equal legal custody rights where mother and father have equal power to decide how the child is raised?
/r/MensRights27/11/12 03:05 PM
14

Well fuck me. ;)
/r/MensRights27/11/12 05:16 AM
-37

I for one think it is incredibly unfair that men don't have the same opportunities to get ovarian cancer that women do?
/r/MensRights27/11/12 04:48 AM
2

I agree with all of this. Other things here I do not. I wish more people on both sides of the issue weren't so reactionary.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 04:16 AM
3

But that's the rub of it, currently a man does not have a "right" NOT to be a parent like a woman does. Prior to Roe v. Wade women didn't have that right either. Until Congress, or perhaps the Supreme Court decide to get the gears moving an American male doesn't have a Constitutional right not to be a parent. I personally think it's unreasonable to draw a line down the center of Pregnancy/Parenthood in order to consider men and women having equal rights on that issue (if that is indeed what you …
/r/MensRights27/11/12 03:47 AM
1

No, but I think that's because of my failure to articulate the first paragraph of my previous post. I think I should just delete it because it's people's answer to the second paragraph I'm most curious about. And now I've edited my prior post whilst also editing this one. My my what funny things wine can do to a person.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 02:29 AM
1

Except that doesn't sound like the solution most people here would accept. I guess I'm trying to say I'd be more comfortable with the idea of "legal parental surrender" if it existed as a contract both parties could sign prior to entering a relationship.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 02:16 AM
3

Edited for clarity: I guess I'm trying to figure out what is an acceptable expectation for a woman to have of a man, and on the other side of the coin, an acceptable expectation for a man to have of a woman.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 02:13 AM
5

I think that's a healthy view. Now if Erasmus would just respond to my questions.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 01:51 AM
1

But his parental right's don't disappear. I need to know what right or rights you are talking about.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 01:43 AM
5

Yeah, I should have edited that for clarity.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:48 AM
5

Not exactly the point I was trying to make, but if a girl shared all of your interests but also happened to be aggressive would that be a deal breaker? Additionally maybe you can provide me with some clarity from what I've viewed from my time browsing here. There seems to be a consensus that women/society don't pay enough attention to the fact that men are sensitive creatures (ie. expect all men to be bread winners, macho, hide their emotions, etc.) but also that not enough women take an active …
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:48 AM
36

Why wouldn’t you want to have a girlfriend or wife every bit as driven as you? Does anyone here disagree with this? I mean does anyone here not want a woman who shares your same interests and viewpoints?
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:26 AM
1

The suggestion is that once a man pulls his dick out, then all of his rights end there. Certainly you don't mean all of his rights? Should mom give birth he will have any and all parental rights as mom. Please note that I am preemptively agreeing with the fact that mom's are traditionally granted custody of children AND that it might be more difficult for certain fathers to enforce their rights. I just feel these kinds of declarative statements take away from the larger issue.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 10:48 PM
3

Is there a way to enter into this type of agreement prior to the woman getting pregnant? This way the "legal parental surrender" doesn't appear to be as much of a potential escape hatch from a dad you might get cold feet at the idea of raising a baby. It doesn't sound terribly romantic to say to a girl prior to dating them: "If you get pregnant we both agree that I will not be responsible." But at least everyone is on equal footing at that point.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 10:26 PM
1

It's a she?
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:01 AM
1

I was thinking along similar lines. I mean is someone forwarding this to you (by you I mean OP) at work or something, or are you just reading it at home on FB?
/r/MensRights25/09/12 01:46 AM
2

Yep that's bad. Does most women do this, or is it mostly just dumb asses who post their fraudulent activities on Facebook?
/r/MensRights21/09/12 05:46 PM
-1

"LOLOL womenz is bitchez when they iz on there periods and that shiz is hard for me to deal with, 4 realz yo." He was okay up until that tired ass joke.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 08:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter