TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

bulletkiller06 Archive

View 4 posts and 232 comments by bulletkiller06 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
21

thank you. I went to four different servers and posted and went though weeks of posts about the sub and this is the first proper awnser I've gotten.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 06:01 AM
-1

Pfffft, no way man, this is clearly a very relaxed place with wholly reasoned and straightforward veiws without any reactionary dogwhistles whatsoever.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 01:36 AM
4

Generally for more serious problems such as people suffering from complications related to sexual assault hospitals will be considerate and selectively assign staff to be sure that the patient feels safe during their recovery, it seems like a rather reactionary feminist (according to the article, though I suspect it might be taking some creative liberties with it's tone in order to stir up some conservative backlash. I'll get back to this) was being treated at a hospital for just that when she r…
/r/MensRights19/10/22 07:35 PM
-3

A supporter of equality is called a humanist. Or an equilitarian.. Also, you're in a place called r/mensrights not r/humanism , are you a bad humanist?
/r/MensRights19/10/22 06:58 PM
-9

You do realize that Nazis practiced capitalism right?
/r/MensRights05/10/22 12:32 AM
-13

Capitalism is the idea of capitalizing on work you aren't doing by using a market, corpratism is the idea of big ol corporations useing their financial power to maintain what is essentially an unfalable plutocracy. They are the same thing.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 07:46 PM
17

Iirc "to those accustomed to privalage, equality can feel like oppression" is a quote originally by an MRA. But they do have a point with the other thing, it's quite common that issues associated with capitalism get misattributed to something else, like feminism or men's rights, and that's a big part of why there are so many cynnacle and reactionary femmenist and mras out there that blame all their problems on patriarchy or gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 05:10 PM
4

Yeah I thought it was doubleing back on the same person with different pronouns
/r/MensRights26/09/22 08:52 PM
15

So they're basically asking if you consensually had sex with someone but only later found out that they were born a different gender than the one they presented as when you had sex, if that constitutes rape (assuming that the unaware party is uncomfortable with the newfound information). In the case given a person born as a woman but presenting as a man, had sex with a gay dude, but when he only later learned they had a vagina he attempted to charge them with rape. Seems silly to me, I mean I do…
/r/MensRights26/09/22 08:22 PM
-2

Yes, what a horrible bastard, thinking rape is bad even in media, where is this world going? Christ dude even if the thing about him completely missing or not properly weighing the male rape bit is true, it's not him being a "white knight" it's cultural conditioning to be more mortified by crimes against women. Don't be a reactionary.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 12:42 AM
43

Haven't there been several rape scenes involving women in the game of thrones series? I don't think that they were that scandalized, also I don't recall the bit about that dude being framed as funny, nor anyone laughing, ofc I don't really get into that show.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 08:33 PM
72

That it's a show that has a lot of horrible shit going on in it and that this really isn't a men's rights issue, but also yeah it kinda voids consent if it's sex or be poor in feudal society.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 08:07 PM
12

Trust me, plenty of white men are still in power, just not on whatever part of government you're listing, not that it really matters who's in power or what race or gender they have.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 10:21 PM
1

The "not possible" attitude.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 01:39 AM
2

With that attitude it is.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 01:38 AM
7

I mean, I think that they're aiming for 0, so, yeah.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 01:37 AM
-4

one expert has said.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 01:54 AM
6

Tbf, the problem is that more things are being named after men in the scientific feild in general, but, like, if it matters so much then why don't more women just name things they discover after themselves?
/r/MensRights13/05/22 11:58 PM
-18

Amazing
/r/MensRights09/05/22 04:46 PM
-8

Because it's supposed to prevent harassment, it kinda works, but it seems like a pretty wasteful way to do that.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 07:29 PM
1

Oh, ok, I thought you were referring to second sex characteristics.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 06:28 PM
1

You're thinking of trans women, trans men are men who were assigned female at birth, and offten maintain female second sex characteristics for much of their early transition
/r/MensRights09/03/22 06:23 PM
1

That's a trans woman dipshit.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 06:21 PM
2

Trans men are men if you ask me. And I'd say they face many of the same problems as cis men. As well as some that are unique to trans men (but that's more of an LGBTQ problem).
/r/MensRights09/03/22 05:23 PM
3

Actually one of the most erogenous parts of the penis is the frenulum (and whoever named the most pleasureable spot on the penis something so stupid should be shot) which is partially attached to the forskin, and can sometimes be damaged or removed by the process of circumcision.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 10:11 PM
2

I would argue that the labia holds the same purpose as the forskin.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 10:09 PM
1

And even if they did it's really not any of their business.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 10:05 PM
-1

Little known fact, sex change surgeries for people below the age of 18 is illigal everywhere, hormones too, the only thing that was legal (but is no longer in Texas) for minors to have were hormone blockers, which were shown to non harmful, entirely reversible, and healthy to the psyche of the individual when paired with integration into the desired gender group. The main function of this is to spread the idea that without Republicans there to save them, the mean Democrats would be going around …
/r/MensRights28/02/22 10:03 PM
11

What the fuck is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights25/02/22 04:20 PM
3

Yeah but he was a dick so..
/r/MensRights24/02/22 06:37 PM
3

Dude, wtf, she got fired over something that fucking stupid? I'm not for hate speech in any format but "men under 5ft 7 don't have human rights" is blatantly a joke no matter how much sincerity you put into the delivery or how much you stick to the gag. It's no reason to end someone's career.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 05:57 PM
-14

This is a place for actual men's issues, not an eco chamber for your thinly veild misogyny. If you don't want to date a girl with a high body count fine, but don't pretend like there's any logical reasoning to it, or that you're sooo persicuted for being called an asshole because you go around talking about it
/r/MensRights19/02/22 06:05 PM
1

I mean, how old was the student? That changes alot.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 04:56 PM
2

“I could have started conversations with people, but I was too nervous and I felt too embarrassed from being out by myself to talk to other people,” Angelica updated her followers. I think she understood that in the end
/r/MensRights05/02/22 12:29 AM
1

I know alot of guys that see sex as an emotional connection... Actually isn't that one of the main points of sex? To build conpananship and bond with a partner so you have someone to have your back? Many of them try multiple partners, and end up unsatisfied. That's why you see lot of older feminists complaining about being 'used' even though they were the ones persuing casual sex. Also thanks a bit of a generalization isn't it, I've never heard of that being a common problem, I'm beginning to su…
/r/MensRights01/02/22 04:26 AM
-10

You people don't even know who the fuck this is, is "innocent untill proven guilty" just something we say until we want to make assumptions?
/r/MensRights01/02/22 12:27 AM
1

No, it's clearly defining what you want and expect from a relationship before you get into it so that you don't end up in that position, and also having a decent bit of understanding (also don't pester partners for sex, and sure as hell don't demand them)
/r/MensRights31/01/22 06:22 PM
0

No dude, you should expect nothing not directly stated and even then change and middle ground compromise must be afforded.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 06:09 PM
0

No dude, sex is one variablly sized part of a relationship, it's typically lesser than intamcy and security, you should not assume people think that it's a large part of the relationship. You should tell them early before it becomes a problem.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 06:00 PM
3

I mean, then it's really not much of a relationship, and one should admit that sex is the primary cause of being together.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 05:52 PM
1

Interesting, but don't men also produce oxytocin from intamcy?
/r/MensRights31/01/22 05:48 PM
1

Ok, but it's the latter that's the slight agaist men not the former. Relationship is about understanding and compromise, not forcing your partner to make you happy and stay on your terms.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 05:46 PM
2

You got a source for any of the shit you just said? Additionally, the reson for greater crime rates by black people is a suspiciously high amount of poverty within their communities (likely because of redlining and continued systemic racism), much of this shit requires qualitative analysis, not just quantitative analysis, to be properly evaluated, you can't just use statistics to back up your bigotry.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 05:05 PM
1

I highly doubt that there are a large amount of trans women imagrating to the UK illegally, but if there was I'm sure that they'd be treated far worse than both cis men and cis women combined. I'm not saying that this isn't sexist, I'm saying don't pretend that trans people are given any preferential treatment.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 09:27 PM
2

Ah, you meant the general "you"
/r/MensRights23/01/22 07:00 PM
2

I like foreigners, xenophilia is good for everyone if done properly. Why would you assume I would be for deportation?
/r/MensRights23/01/22 06:52 PM
1

We should accept the foreign with open arms! Regardless the gender, these people need help, and they need us to help them.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 06:46 PM
1

If their fleeing it's probably because they weren't on board with the whole radical murder religion take, and people back home are probably expecting them too.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 06:44 PM
1

Hot take: India wouldn't be as good as it is today without Brittan (I mean it's not good but it'd be worse)
/r/MensRights23/01/22 06:41 PM
1

The truth is that we're all treated like property by our government, and the elite, but instead of fighting the injustices of class we've been turned against one another.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 06:34 PM
2

Ah yes the trans community, notorious for the amount of special privilege and respect they get /s
/r/MensRights23/01/22 06:29 PM
1

Dude, he litterary gave you a link full of feminist and their direct opinions, and you gave him an article by a single feminist who you think "had a tone about her"
/r/MensRights13/01/22 03:47 PM
1

From what I read (and I read pretty far) about 3/4ths of feminist on there were against mgm, the major variation being that some felt it was less damaging than fgm even if they felt it should be treated the same, some were the exact opposite feeling it was directly on par with fgm. As opposed to being for mgm the remaining 1/4 felt that: I really don't think there is much benefit in expanding the definition of feminism to be so broad that it no longer pertains directly to fighting for the rights…
/r/MensRights13/01/22 03:43 PM
7

I don't blame the man by any metric but "handling her own mind properly." Is a shit take, you can't just "not have depression"
/r/MensRights05/01/22 07:23 PM
4

Every time I have got insulted or told that “I’m pretending to be a woman” Oh, I may have misinterpreted..
/r/MensRights02/01/22 05:38 PM
6

Fricking Terfs
/r/MensRights02/01/22 05:35 PM
1

Ah, well.. just take care of yourself friend. I know what it's like to have a particularly rough child hood that sticks with you, but the world's only half as bad as it seems and there are people who know you and who care.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 09:57 PM
1

Oh, these actions and mindsets are exclusively related to women. Men don't even have these options. [...] We all gett butthurt when we hear "not all women", including me, because it's so widespread and the danger is so real it may as well be all women. [...] My sister cooks, cleans and doesn't complain about it despite having a pretty demanding job herself. [...] So I guess exceptions really do exist. They're just so damned rare. [...] You know, despite my screwed up sexuality, I really did want…
/r/MensRights30/12/21 09:01 AM
1

Jesus dude, that's rough. I was being a tad facetious before but I am genuinely sorry to hear that you and your boyfriend had to go though that. But still you have to recognize that just because the person that did all of those things is a woman doesn't make any of those actions or preceding mindsets are inherently related to women. She did definitely exploit nearly every advantage she had systematically in order to screw your bf over though, so I can definitely understand how you found your way…
/r/MensRights30/12/21 07:53 AM
1

Sorry to hear about your shitty dating life, but it's important to remember that personal anecdotes aren't sufficient for catch alls. Edit: also happy cake day
/r/MensRights30/12/21 06:15 AM
1

That's real deep man
/r/MensRights30/12/21 06:09 AM
0

whether a subreddit is more like your house or like a public platform, That's the beauty part when it comes to private corporations and sites, they aren't public domain those who respect freedom of speech will allow speech they don't like to happen in the discussion. That's how you propagate hate and ignorance, people are not capable of deciphering information on their own, they will eat up terrible ideas and continue replicating them, no amount of "open debate" can change the minds of people af…
/r/MensRights30/12/21 05:46 AM
8

It's a female incel subreddit
/r/MensRights29/12/21 06:50 PM
2

Understandable
/r/MensRights29/12/21 06:50 PM
1

Eh, to each their own But she should really open with "hi I'm looking for a financial crutch, I won't contribute much in that regard but we can totally be boyfriend/girlfriend" I mean someone will take her up on the offer and everyone will be informed and consenting.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 09:42 AM
0

I actually respect gender studies, a lot of the people who founded the men's rights movement studied gender studies. And sociology has actually done good research (it's just unfortunate that we leave acting on said research to dimwited politicians). I just think it's a shame that colleges are so eager to buster their numbers in the less cared about studies that they'd let people expouse such blatant hate and claim it has any sort of acidemic backing without repercussion, it clearly doesn't, even…
/r/MensRights26/12/21 07:38 PM
1

betterhelp.com I'll bet these people know a thing or two about culture, sex, and relationships. You should really have a discussion with them.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 08:05 AM
1

Sure, but cross dressing is not expressly sexual, even if you don't identify with the gender you're presenting as it's still a part of your identity Now there are some people who do such things with more paraphilic intent, but they do not speak for transvestites as a whole.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 07:11 AM
0

Dude seriously, get help. These are dangerous and wildly ignorant views Consent is a double-edged sword: it can prevent abuse being perpetrated, but it can also prevent people expressing their own needs when it is used to actively override and prevent their own agency. they were crafted poorly and hurriedly without considering the implications. Consent must always have enough flexibility to allow informed personal agency and thus needs to be determined on a case by case basis, not by a blanket a…
/r/MensRights26/12/21 05:07 AM
0

I'm sorry sir but you seem to have missed Hellenistic Greece by about 2500 some years. Relationships are more a female thing: for men it's the sexual experience. You don't think most men have relationships with prostitutes, although it can be a fantasy. Seriously though wtf? Who brought you up? This is not how humans work, men and women are both intamcy craving creatures that want for more than sex.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 02:55 AM
1

That's.. not correct.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 02:47 AM
-1

Lack of everything rights in The middle east, lack of bodily rights in Texas, the (now former, yay) pink tax in the UK. Places exist outside of your city you know?
/r/MensRights25/12/21 06:19 PM
10

No no, keep going
/r/MensRights25/12/21 06:15 PM
2

Education and non-shameing attitudes are important. However the age law is the age law for a reason, boys are not emotionally mature enough to handle sexual relationships, and disavowing such restrictions from law and society could also likely lead to abuse and explotation.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 05:23 PM
1

Most neutral source I could find (in 3minits) "Women more resilient to extreme physical activity than previously reported -- ScienceDaily" https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/11/181119064145.htm
/r/MensRights25/12/21 05:14 PM
0

I mean.. yeah? But that doesn't make it a genderd issue Just a cultural difference, and though I guess it gives food for thought on cultural differences in general, it's far from a common problem and doesn't seem to be getting any support or ire for any particular gender (as in, oh how dare they do this to __?, Or this always happens to _!, You'd never see them do this to __!) It's not a general thing in any sense really, and one can't say how people would act if this was more common without tal…
/r/MensRights25/12/21 04:59 PM
18

People would be against it either way. And some people would be for it either way I don't really think it's a genderd issue..
/r/MensRights25/12/21 02:59 PM
54

Oh, wow. I've always wondered what would happen in this sort of a situation (I mean, it would have to be an actual situation with the 8billion people in the world and all). How is this regarding men's rights though?
/r/MensRights25/12/21 01:55 AM
1

Good for you dude! People should be happy with who they are, and not be forced to be something else!
/r/MensRights25/12/21 01:50 AM
0

Lol, people are down voting you I don't know if it's transphobic, sexist, or just "w- you don't agree! How dare you not repeat what I said!" But it shows you just how fucking dumb some of the people here are!
/r/MensRights25/12/21 01:48 AM
1

Yea, might as well sign up, if they tell you u gotta go to war just tell them to go fuck themselves, it's worked before.. somewhat.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 01:15 AM
1

Cool economic policies tho..
/r/MensRights25/12/21 01:12 AM
1

Switzerland has a military? I just assumed that they had a trooper watching the border with a big sign that says "danger huge guns under road".
/r/MensRights25/12/21 01:07 AM
1

That dose seem fair, and it would encourage the financially unstable to stop having children. However I think acceptions should be made in the case of non-consentual conception, in witch the man should have to pay for upkeep of the child (assuming it was the woman that didn't consent of course).
/r/MensRights25/12/21 01:04 AM
1

I'm sorry to say that I don't believe that's correct. Wayyy to many trad-con "I'm not sexist but.. wokes are ruining this country, and by wokes I mean people who don't agree with me that men and women have very specific gender roles that they should stick to, also since we're cool with me saying that, we have it worse and racism isn't racism" types around here Unfortunately there are to many "I totally get that men have problems and all, but just remember that women have it worse" types around m…
/r/MensRights25/12/21 12:57 AM
1

But you don't know them Or the details of those court cases. What happened to innocent untill proven guilty? As far as I'm concerned this is a neutral statement that we are incapable of passing any judgement on or feeling any way about.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 12:50 AM
1

The Soviets had just as many front lines women as they did support. It's been shown time and time again that men and women are on average the same strength, and capable of the same strength extremes. (Also interesting side note, a military study has supposedly shown that on average men make the better snipers, something about them moving more after every shot and avoiding glare better.)
/r/MensRights25/12/21 12:46 AM
1

In many places in the world all of them Sadi Arabia Indonesia Texas But other than that in the US the only legal difference is that men are legally required to join the draft (or however you word that) and women aren't.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 12:19 AM
1

Is this what we are now, a pitty party? "Oh woe is me the mean wokes made a TV show that makes men look stupid!" Come on man, you want people to take us seriously right? Focus on the serious problems, if you want to show the sexism of feminism then stick to the actual things self proclaimed feminist do and say. Otherwise you'll just look like a bitter "but what about me?!" Reactionary.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 01:13 AM
2

Literally means cross dressed you layman.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 08:52 PM
3

I don't see the link
/r/MensRights18/12/21 05:04 AM
8

Feeling comfortable isn't a right, transvestites make tradcons uncomfortable, but that's the tradcon's problem. Same with menacing looking dudes and women. men do have to stop acting so creepy and overpowering in spaces You say that like it's something so many men do. It's really not.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 04:07 AM
0

I looked it up because I had no clue what you were saying, and "pedagogy" litterary just means "approach to teaching", are you anti-science or something? What are you trying to say? Also my favorite thing about conservatism, your always "just a couple of years (maybe decades) away" from that big uprising that happens and restores everything to it's pristine former glory, then a couple of years pass and nothing happens, least not here in the good ol' US of A that is. Maybe you get a president tha…
/r/MensRights16/12/21 09:32 AM
1

You're right I'm sorry.. You'd be a voluntary celibate right? That's a clever work around.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 03:46 AM
1

You miss the time before the internet and the spread of progressive veiws, the times when you could just believe anything without having to be challenged on it, because most everyone in your local area agreed with your veiws, and those who didn't were easy to ignore and overpower with basic rhetoric.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 03:44 AM
1

You are correct, unfortunately not everyone here is.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 03:40 AM
1

and is very influential in education. Where? The "boys being given lower marks than girls" thing is tenuous at best, and as far as actual academic subjects only thing that springs to mind as biased is sociology, but seeing as that's considerd a joke science by many academics (and is also the place where we most of our supporting statistics), I would say that no one's education is being influenced by feminism.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 03:38 AM
-1

Look, I think that BLM and feminist can be cringe af But they are talking about actual important issues (albeit in a way that comes off accusatory and exclusionary), to disregard them as "looking for anything to complain about" is regressive. (With the exception of the wage gap, that is just a reason to complain).
/r/MensRights16/12/21 03:29 AM
1

You over estimate your numbers, if every "anti-woke" stepped forward you would only achieve mass labeling. And the few good points you have (such as, "men have major societal issues that are greatly ignored") would be overshadowed and disregard along with your tearable ones. We are already seeing to much of this as it is, please do not try to "step forward".
/r/MensRights16/12/21 03:23 AM
-1

Actual Incel logic.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 03:16 AM
1

I genuinely can't tell if this is satire, I think it is, but when it comes to republicans...
/r/MensRights16/12/21 03:15 AM
1

I've always thought of it as a rubber band, as we continue to progress we'll naturally get pushback, eventually we'll take two steps back, but we'll have already taken 3 steps forward (sort of like how when you stretch a rubber band it snaps back, but not as tightly as it was before).
/r/MensRights16/12/21 03:11 AM
0

*"when conservatives fuck things up so bad we don't have time to question what we're thinking and doing"
/r/MensRights16/12/21 03:07 AM
1

Women were actually hunter gatherers as well. What you're saying there is just straight up bullshit. And tons of women have fought in war. It's shit like this that makes men's rights activism look like a half assed reactionary movement.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 03:04 AM
0

Nor was that trad con wishful thinking you just spouted off about. Actually, come to think of it I've never heard a trad con specifically say "men rebuild society", so this would be a little worse I think.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 03:00 AM
0

Fast if we continue to let trad con nonsense like this post fester here.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 02:48 AM
3

At least there are some reasonable people here. Thank you.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 02:38 AM
0

I think I've just released I'm on the wrong side of history.. We are not in a "woke phase", it's called progress Yes not every leftist is the brightest, but the feminist have done much to advance history (they just fell into the us vs them trap that plagues so many revolutionary movements). To go back in time would be go to the time that men were sent to death in droves with the majority of the population not even believing that we have emotions (and of course women being treated like property).…
/r/MensRights16/12/21 02:30 AM
1

Nah mate, marriage is a scam cooked up by the capitalist to sell rings and wedding dresses. As long as you find a good partner divorce should be the least of your worries..
/r/MensRights15/12/21 07:51 PM
1

If you marry a random stranger maybe. If you've found someone you know and love it should be closer to 5/95.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 07:48 PM
-11

Disagreed, no one deserves the death penalty and we should exercise more understanding and sympathy for even the worst of people, they need treatment But not forgiveness.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 04:14 PM
1

Agreed, but irrational acts cased by depression include: texting a friend at 3Am to tell them you don't want to be alive, getting super drunk, eating all the food, laying in bed all day, and in extreme cases suicide. But not fucking pedocide!
/r/MensRights13/12/21 04:10 PM
1

Men and women have the same physiological capabilities on average, having different standards is just stupid (and somewhat insulting). Frankly I've never heard of or seen a liberal advocate for "inclusive standers" though I wouldn't be too surprised if there was someone that naive, I would be more inclined to believe that this was an attempt by the military to recruit more people (perhaps whilst broadcasting some tradcon "women weak, men strong" BS, but perhaps not).
/r/MensRights13/12/21 03:02 AM
-10

Dude, India has a pedophilia party. Your country was not "naturally progressing" Also none of this has anything to do with what I or the person I responded to said.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 03:32 PM
-112

Let them mock us. Equality is coming and equality is a bitch. See, saying ominous shit like that is why people think we are a school shooter incel sub. Stop.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 02:30 AM
7

I would have started with homeless proportions and violence statistics and also not in a hostile conversation. But yea. That counts as defending your stances absurdity.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 02:28 AM
3

Not necessarily, finding things that seem far feched comical doesn't make them any less far feched. It just shows that feminist find this movement far feched. You have to prove them wrong if you want us to look more credible.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 02:17 AM
0

She says some ignorant shit, so what? You'd have them abandon their friend over that? That's like ditching your friend because they occasionally use the N word, it's wrong and f'ed up, but it's no reason to lose a friend. Besides, OP may be the only positive influence in her life, if they drop her for her beliefs that'll only reaffirm them, if they stay and keep explaining their reasoning she'll probably realize that what she's doing is wrong eventually. Plus friends are really fucking hard to m…
/r/MensRights12/11/21 11:48 AM
-18

It's self evident that any organization that builds itself on tearing others down is not truly equalitarian Fuck no, friends are hard to make. Don't lose one on this petty shit!
/r/MensRights12/11/21 12:44 AM
0

Change who dose and doesn't deserve rights you mean? Or perhaps increasing poverty and violence is your passion? Decreasing tax brackets for the rich? Blindly following the person who promises to beat back the woke SJW libtards the most? The left libertarians have their faults, but Jesus Christ are the trad cons something else.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 03:16 AM
0

I kindly ask all transphobes to fuck off so that we can continue to not look like an incel sub. Or even better, read some scientific literature and stop being a dick.
/r/MensRights08/11/21 01:40 PM
-1

Fuck off the both of you
/r/MensRights08/11/21 01:04 PM
14

Not to disagree or get to political or anything But I hope he doesn't get fucked.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 12:53 AM
2

Yea, Anarchist don't do anything political wise. Because they don't think politics is the way to fix things We live in a shitty society that feeds the powerful endlessly and oppresses the impoverished, no politician cares for anything more than continuing to be a politician. They'll feed you any line to continue to sit there and do nothing. Conservatives don't care about anyone but themselves, anything they say about change is just a farce wrapped in their admittedly genuine world view, say what…
/r/MensRights02/11/21 04:30 AM
1

"democrats" don't care. True left wingers, care for true equality.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 06:08 PM
1

Funny, I've never once seen a politician defend men's rights. I have however, seen many an anarchist from many a place in the world support equalitarian views that actually acknowledge the idea of issues specific to men and support trying to change them. The only thing conservatives care about is getting richer The only thing democrats care about is looking good The only people who care about you, are you and people who've been through similar struggles, which the politicians never will.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 06:05 PM
44

The headline the local news puts out: local "teen" finally ends illegal relationship with teacher
/r/MensRights31/10/21 10:55 PM
-11

Yes! Join the commune mascurads!
/r/MensRights29/10/21 02:43 AM
1

"in any unified body there's gotta be an asshole"
/r/MensRights25/10/21 04:13 AM
1

Can't turn my screen sideways, what are the options?
/r/MensRights23/10/21 10:03 PM
1

How does this pertain to men's rights?
/r/MensRights17/10/21 05:28 AM
4

For fuck sake... There is no such thing as "the patriarchy", what we currently have is a world that is unfair because it so often generalizes both men and women as strong and smart respectively, although that sounds nice and right it puts everyone at a disadvantage as men have to work harder for education and women have to work harder experience based positions. With obvious exceptions for the middle east, those are some patriarchs (but life still sucks for men too, just not quite as bad).
/r/MensRights03/10/21 09:00 PM
1

And this is why we get called a "reactionary movement"...
/r/MensRights15/09/21 12:50 AM
0

I'm trying to help us be better than the feminist...
/r/MensRights11/09/21 10:37 PM
1

Oh.. I thought you were being genuine too. I actually feel kinda bad now..
/r/MensRights11/09/21 10:34 PM
-2

who are the ones who actually Implys that the other of two is not I don't think that you ment to say any such thing, however you did Additionally, by doing any speculation on what men seemingly are, you are in essence saying that it is in someway possible to objectify a sex, wich will in turn lead to this being some "men good, women bad" group similar to feminisms "women good, men bad" Bull. I'm not acuseing you of saying anything bad, I'm saying that bad things are interpretable by the way that…
/r/MensRights11/09/21 10:27 PM
-3

if they don't genuinely think like that (which to some degree they probably do) But yeah I don't seem to find it half as offenseve as the women looking at it do.. even though it's against me.. not them..
/r/MensRights11/09/21 08:37 PM
-2

I just don't want this place devolving into "reverse feminism" Which is why I said to leave the stories and cut the speculation I still think Hector is a badass with a heart of gold.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 08:09 PM
16

I withdraw my statement, somehow women found this misandristic joke offenseve to them and think that is why it was posted. Just wow.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 07:37 PM
8

It's not all bad, look at the responses to this
/r/MensRights11/09/21 07:23 PM
-18

Observation =/= empirical evidence To say that men are "friendly people who are the ones who actually have open arms for others." Implys that women do not
/r/MensRights11/09/21 07:11 PM
-16

That's awesome, but in order to not conflate ourselves with feminist who stariotype men and women (such as you have by calling men more friendly) or the "proud to be a woman" feminist, please refrain from the speculation outside of the story.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 06:47 PM
36

"throwing buzzwords around in quotable ways doesn't make you wise" My gram gram
/r/MensRights11/09/21 03:48 PM
2

Yea, I'mma need some falsifiable evidence if you're gonna try and sell such a bold claim. But I get the feeling that, based on the drawn out and abstract nature of (all of this), this is entirely perpetuated by circular thinking.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 09:48 PM
1

Gender = identity Sex = biology Sexual = desired intercourse parameters For clarification
/r/MensRights20/08/21 07:46 PM
1

I see.. you're argument hinges on the idea that transvestism has a sexual stem rather than an identical one, and that, as such, means that it can still neatly fit into your concept of dressing purely for sexual appelé. See, you're simply wrong. The truth is that dressing in most all forms is an act of identification, unless of course you were trying to claim typical gender roles, in that women are a sexual object and men are their persuers, in which case you are an actual hinderance to this grou…
/r/MensRights20/08/21 07:00 PM
0

You on Ritalin man? These are not cohesive thoughts..
/r/MensRights20/08/21 05:56 PM
-1

Finally, onto the matter of "what she was wearing". For thousands of years, Style of dress denoted your class, your line of work, and your social status. For hundreds of years in American Society, women had to dress conservatively. To dress in more revealing ways was akin to "visual prostitution" and a signal of a woman "looking to get some". And if you look at what women wear today to go clubbing, which is often "To cruise for some dick" in today's world, you'll have to admit that when women wa…
/r/MensRights20/08/21 05:35 PM
1

Understandable.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 05:42 PM
15

“The men's rights movement is best understood as a reactionary movement that emerged into real visibility in the wake of the accomplishments of feminist legal reformers,” she said, “who were able to, after not just decades, but centuries of struggle, to ensure that all of the rights that are accorded to people are extended without regard to sex." That's BS, they're comparing us to ALM and making claim that feminism is "for everyone" nether of wich are true. But, largely, men’s rights activism is…
/r/MensRights19/08/21 05:35 PM
0

If they're brain dead I could understand that, but this goes for people on dialysis as well! Also why is it better? Do euthanize people not go to heaven or something?
/r/MensRights19/08/21 05:25 PM
0

Holy crap I was wrong, there is an option to just "pull the plug" and let them die violently of their disease! Euthanasia is an alternative.. Do you really view that as better?
/r/MensRights19/08/21 05:13 PM
0

Hate to break it to you.. but we don't actually just pull the plug and let them die.. we put them down first..
/r/MensRights19/08/21 05:04 PM
1

It's wrong because it's murder. Why is it murder?
/r/MensRights19/08/21 04:49 PM
0

Actually with family permission (or if money dries up) we pull the plug
/r/MensRights19/08/21 04:44 PM
1

And when it comes to reasons, I’d say the decision to get an abortion is so heavy, that any reason is a good reason, simply due to the fact that it’s an extremely hard choice to make. That's circular thinking dude. And I disagree with you, it's not a "tramatic experience" to bore a child if there's no risk.. that's like saying it would be horrible if someone had to go to the dentist on the behest of another even if it meant something really important.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 04:37 PM
2

And when it comes to reasons, I’d say the decision to get an abortion is so heavy, that any reason is a good reason, simply due to the fact that it’s an extremely hard choice to make. That's circular thinking dude. And I disagree with you, it's not a "tramatic experience" to bore a child if there's no risk.. that's like saying it would be horrible if someone had to go to the dentist on the behest of another even if it meant something really important.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 04:37 PM
1

No, no, just the one's on this chain. Additionally, despite now having my response you've neglected to address any of my points. So, what do you make of non-cognizant life such as plants, animals, microbes, and the brain dead? Are they all equal to you?
/r/MensRights19/08/21 03:39 PM
2

I guess I over estimated your ability to read multiple responses, sorry.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 03:26 PM
1

No, doesn't mean it's not assault or a generaly aholish thing to do. That didn't awenser your question?
/r/MensRights19/08/21 03:10 PM
2

I'm pro-choice, but it should be the choice of two parties.. Why would we snuff out potential if there is a suitable (or at least willing to become) parent? It's not as if the mother really has a high risk of dieing in a place that's advanced enough to have easy access to an abortion clinic (unless under special circumstance in which case it's understandable). The only real reason I could get for abortion is if there is minimal chance that the child could find a good home/parent, and as it stand…
/r/MensRights19/08/21 03:08 PM
1

Such circular thinking, "it's wrong because it's wrong" and "I'm right because I'm right" Do you know what my thinking is? It's ok because it's not the same as cognizant life, if I felt that life was precious regardless of awareness I would simply not be able to exist Un-hypocritically, because I need substance from living organisms, and to deem these organisms less than human on the grounds of anything other than cognizance is pure fallicy as we have proven they act the same on a cellular level…
/r/MensRights19/08/21 02:57 PM
1

If you euthanize a brain dead person is it murder? (Since we're going the emotional route here)
/r/MensRights19/08/21 02:30 PM
1

No, doesn't mean it's not assault or a generaly aholish thing to do.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 02:28 PM
8

I get that, but it's best to lead modestly and site sources. That way when they check they see that it's possibly an understatement!
/r/MensRights19/08/21 03:24 AM
6

Not all of these statistics are 100% correct! Also non cognizant cells though technically alive are not equivalent to cognizant life, unless you want to argue that bacteria, fungus, and plants are all equal to you (and if that's the case, food is going to be a problem!). Anyhow you are right in men having the majority percentage, just not the proper one.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 02:36 AM
42

Oh it was peer pressure, Whew- face saved!
/r/MensRights16/08/21 11:19 PM
2

Something I saw on here somewhere..
/r/MensRights16/08/21 06:29 PM
4

I believe that domestic abuse is actually perpetrated on men in around 60% of cases.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 06:27 PM
143

The Honorable Justice Barbara Walther No
/r/MensRights16/08/21 06:21 PM
1

I mean.. we're agreeing? I think
/r/MensRights16/08/21 04:35 PM
6

This research found that while both women and men have more favorable views of women, women's in-group biases were 4.5 times stronger[5] than those of men. And only women (not men) showed cognitive balance among in-group bias, identity, and self-esteem, revealing that men lack a mechanism that bolsters automatic preference for their own gender. One study found that the effect is mediated by increased gender equality. The mediation comes not from differences in attitudes towards women, but in att…
/r/MensRights16/08/21 04:32 PM
0

Perhaps that was the original message, but considering how many people here are saying "I can't believe they're complaining when we have it worse" it's clear that this is a horrible choice of example that will only serve to make us look bad.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 04:02 PM
4

Wanna take a poll? Seems pretty split to me.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 03:41 PM
31

Yes, wich is why nitpicking "wich is worse" sends the message that all we care about is pulling out the "what about me?" card where ever we can.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 02:30 PM
1

I mean, I agree.. in general religion is a determent to society and logic, however I still respect religious freedom and believe in doing reformation the old fashioned (and effective) way (PROPAGANDA!).
/r/MensRights16/08/21 02:06 PM
85

I wouldn't say anyone has it worse, some people would rather die, others would rather bare hell with hope. Collectively we should all be against terrorist and theologist, so you dissputing here sets a bad imagine.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 01:56 PM
4

Jihadist* Islamics are just people, jihadist are monsters
/r/MensRights16/08/21 01:51 PM
1

Also go preach your doomsday conspiracy elsewhere, this is a place for problems pertaining to men specifically (not some weird extinction prophecy). Edit: ok I think I may be being a little to harsh, it seems you really believe what you're saying and if that's the case I appreciate that you were concerned enough to share. But you do know that problems like economical and social stratification and divide have been around since the beginning of time right? And that the superpowers being at odds ha…
/r/MensRights16/08/21 11:20 AM
0

Good, weddings are a scam and we're overpopulated. I see less marriage and childbirth as an absolute win (bonus for the decline of religion, it was rarely not a determent to society).
/r/MensRights16/08/21 11:09 AM
1

Right so a few things, One, we do not live in a patriarchy. To simplify if I were to put up a list of social niche's in twelve descending parts it would go teir1~male teirs2-7~female teirs8-12~male/minor female mix. Two, I get that the idea of a homosexual lead as a way of combating heteronormativity, however a lot of that criticism comes from the fact that many of these movies are just blatant attempts to either push your political beliefs or draw in draw in more of a crowd by shoehorning in a …
/r/MensRights15/08/21 11:34 PM
2

Yup, people gonna be trolls Let's not go poke one with political pull..
/r/MensRights10/08/21 04:00 AM
7

Okay, so maybe you are a man. Maybe you haven't had the easiest ride in life—maybe you grew up in poverty; you've experienced death, neglect, and despair; you hate your job, your car, your body. Maybe somebody (or multiple somebodies) pulverized your heart, or maybe you've never even been loved enough to know what a broken heart feels like. Maybe shit started out unfair and became irreparable and you never deserved any of this. Maybe everything looks fine on paper, but you're just unhappy and yo…
/r/MensRights07/08/21 04:15 PM
1

Damm dude, that's awesome
/r/MensRights06/08/21 07:35 PM
1

Unpopular opinion (in this sub): chivalry is cool, and should be considered empowering.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 05:50 PM
1

Those are no more liberal subs than the actual hate subs are conservative (based on the people inside them).
/r/MensRights05/08/21 04:26 AM
1

Also what hate speech is on liberal subs? They talk about weed and trans-rights whilst bitching about conservatives dumb policy's, the mirrored imagine of what conservative subs like r/conservative do (and don't get banned for).
/r/MensRights04/08/21 07:13 PM
1

Not really a coincidence, I mean before you got into all of this stuff you probably didn't even know anything about men's rights, whereas you probably knew a lot about feminism because they were the biggest propagators. Who the spotlight falls on largely depends on who's holding it, currently feminist are pointing out the flaws of others (actual flaws) whilst hiding theirs behind their better members. If that was hard to follow, feminist are the ones who are getting to make introductions, conven…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 07:08 PM
1

I still think it's oversight as opposed to bias.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 06:31 PM
2

Ah yes, i remember hearing about that one, that sub probably should constitute as hate speech..
/r/MensRights04/08/21 06:10 PM
0

It was being cracked down on, but it was still rampant (and blatant), and since the spotlight was on them and they were presumed bad before trail... Look I'm not saying it was right, just that I can see why it happened, and also I don't think that'll happen here (I suppose we'll see). Also what is FDS?
/r/MensRights04/08/21 05:53 PM
0

I don't think it's a matter of censorship so much as it is that the rights "rebel spirit" is getting them banned because they can't follow rules. Not that there aren't a lot of leftist assholes (believe me there are), or that feminist aren't hippocrates (they definitely are!), But they do know enough to follow the rules.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 05:35 PM
0

Men's rights is not a right-wing topic, it's a progressive equalitarian topic that right-wingers like to throw they're hat into because it's perfectly balanced to be progressive (because we're not bad guys!), Rebellious (because we're so unique and smart), and still allowing for you to throw around your misogyny under the facade that you're fighting for true equality! Not that you're not fighting for equality, but the right in general is setting back this movement.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 04:46 PM
4

Suicide rates are actually higher for straight people. In the first world anyway. Not to discredit the problems that gay people face, just your statement seemed flawed.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 05:54 PM
6

Nah dude, if you want to be a true MRA you gota wear those things LOUD AND PROUD
/r/MensRights29/07/21 05:11 PM
0

You fuckers are like glitter, you're everywhere and no matter how many we ban there's always more. No your pseudo-science 'pop psychology' bullshit simply isn't correct "Alpha males" are not naturally more attractive in the eyes of females, it's a long set of personal experiences (amongst a crap ton of other nuanced things) that go into partner preferences.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 04:56 PM
1

If you're referring to Canada it's not discrimination it's statistical fact that gay men are more likely to gain HIV and some other STDs (which is why they can't give blood if they have been sexually active recently) But if reealy bothers you, then I might have a solution.. but you're not going to like it...
/r/MensRights26/07/21 02:54 PM
1

TF do think mexico is? Hell risen? And how do you think a wall helps? Have you never heard of Visas or planes?
/r/MensRights14/07/21 11:47 PM
0

YES
/r/MensRights14/07/21 11:42 PM
-1

At least he didn't try to dig the country further into a hole by building a wall on the southern border, I mean that's some lex Luther shit right there (minus the intelligence of course)
/r/MensRights14/07/21 11:39 PM
-3

Do you really think we needed to cheat to out vote the worst fucking president in American history?
/r/MensRights14/07/21 11:33 PM
-3

You literally passed a dozen laws trying to "prevent voter fraud" that specifically targeted minorities.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 11:19 PM
1

Conservatives actively try to strip every deviant and minority of their rights whilst claiming to be "constitutional", live and let live my ass. This group is full of actual good people trying to make good change, don't go sullying it with your backwards political views.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 11:09 PM
1

Something something privacy, idk but it seems proper.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 12:51 PM
2

You should remove her username
/r/MensRights11/07/21 12:45 PM
5

Today children we will be learning about cohesion
/r/MensRights10/07/21 02:53 AM
2

Hey hey, I'm all for pointing out the inequality of feminism, but don't drag furrys down to their level.
/r/MensRights05/07/21 03:08 AM
-1

Actually that all sounds fairly reasonable to me, the odd bit is that she doesn't talk with him about it (at least she doesn't mention it here) and that she structures it as a gendered issue 'the man doesn't understand emotional labor' whereas it should be 'my spouse doesn't understand emotional labor' or perhaps 'me and my spouse have grown so accustomed to traditional gender roles that we've lost the ability to empathize with each other's struggles' if you want to go the compromising route. An…
/r/MensRights04/07/21 12:47 AM
4

What is that?
/r/MensRights03/07/21 01:46 AM
4

MGTOW?
/r/MensRights02/07/21 11:53 PM
-2

It's satire right? Please tell me that you've liked satire.
/r/MensRights29/06/21 09:44 PM
-3

Who do you quote friend?
/r/MensRights29/06/21 09:24 PM
1

Viva la unity, welcome!
/r/MensRights28/06/21 06:42 PM
1

Would have been more accurate if you had put liberal or conservative
/r/MensRights27/06/21 02:28 AM
1

This movement, that once was proclaiming getting rights for women now is their worst enemy. No no, WRA are still valid as women do indeed still suffer from gender stariotypes and some stratification, It's the feminist approach to women's rights activism that is oppressive, see they believe (and deceive others into believing) that only women suffer from problems whilst denying male exemption in "progressive movements" as a problem, even going so far as to hypocritically deny negitive male stariot…
/r/MensRights26/06/21 12:11 AM
1

Yes, yes there would because feminist are more outspoken and advertised, and they don't deal well with having someone who opposes their extreme notions and points out that women don't own a monopoly on gender rooted problems. It would be entirely fine if it was just men's rights activists and women's rights activists, because they share common goals (such as abolishing the use of gender stariotypes) but thanks to feminist it has become "worship women or hate them, men have no problems and deserv…
/r/MensRights25/06/21 11:44 PM
5

Libertarian is probably the most common party here.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 05:03 AM
6

Vote this way or they'll do this No vote this way or they'll do this After election: does nothing
/r/MensRights25/06/21 05:00 AM
-6

Not in the slightest
/r/MensRights25/06/21 04:59 AM
1

Isn't this a little paradoxical as debating it only proves it's correctness and validates it's usefulness? (Not that I disagree)
/r/MensRights25/06/21 04:07 AM
1

No need he gave you one
/r/MensRights15/06/21 04:23 AM
18

Oddly not r/feminism tho
/r/MensRights15/06/21 04:13 AM
-3

Semi-touche
/r/MensRights15/06/21 01:03 AM
25

Never thought of it like that, but yea that is some BS right there.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 12:59 AM
3

Yep here we are https://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/nyw19m/male_teachers_in_spain_protesting_gendering/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share I mean that's cool dude but you're missing a key opportunity to break in your "look we're fighting for the same thing" speech!
/r/MensRights14/06/21 12:00 AM
3

Wasn't this just on r/feminism
/r/MensRights13/06/21 11:55 PM
2

From what I've seen it's mostly a sub that talks about the negitive stariotypes affecting men, as well as the negitive effects of feminist more extreme ideas on men's rights and gender equality as a whole.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 05:59 PM
1

SAHMs?
/r/MensRights13/06/21 05:31 PM
4

A question I know I'm gonna regret asking; aren't a lot of the people on this sub leftist? It seemed to me that most here are against gender stariotypes and for stigmatization recognition.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 10:09 PM
3

Seems weird to not address yourself with the generaly more accepted term if you can get away with it.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 08:56 PM
3

Not to get political but you know that most totalitarians aren't socialists right? With the exception of Nazi Germany most totalitarians prefer communistic states, and pretty much everyone that isn't the good 'ol U.S.A is subscribed to socialists policy's
/r/MensRights11/06/21 08:03 PM
1

I think it's important to remember that women were also a big contributor to the science of the past as well, but at the same time not try to make women the UNDISPUTABLE SCIENCE GODS for a month, I think a well publicized 2weeks about the kind of women who created baby formula or the one who discovered the double helix shape of DNA are brought up would suffice, I also think that the idea of owning a month like it was some sort of ethnic birthday ("all about you!") is stupid wich is why I mention…
/r/MensRights06/06/21 05:09 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter