TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

buyu667 Archive

View 3 posts and 41 comments by buyu667 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
20

It is cruel to males. It is a painful and unnecessary procedure for boys. It is torture for some men, after they find out all the pleasurable spots on the penis they’ll never have access to because they were removed.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 12:29 PM
18

The worst is the CDC’s guidelines for doctors to push for circumcision on intact men and teenagers. It’s a form of psychological terrorism and sends the message to the general public that the foreskin is useless. Men deserve better care than amputation at birth or amputation for dubious reasons later in life.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 12:55 PM
4

Normally, coping wouldn’t involve inflicting the damage onto the next generation.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 01:59 PM
3

You don’t have a reference to compare it to
/r/MensRights02/03/22 01:54 PM
3

Do you even know the nature of what gets cut off?
/r/MensRights02/03/22 01:44 PM
5

The way you’re born is normal and accounts for 70% of the world’s men. You suffered a genital modification without consent.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 01:09 PM
3

https://www.bloodstainedmen.com/
/r/MensRights02/03/22 01:07 PM
12

The son of god was celibate too? Are you?
/r/MensRights01/03/22 03:22 PM
1

https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/US/en/search/human-foreskin-fibroblast?page=1&perPage=30&sort=relevance&term=human%20foreskin%20fibroblast&type=product_name https://www.atcc.org/products/pcs-201-010
/r/MensRights21/02/22 05:45 PM
3

Circumcision had the same purpose…
/r/MensRights21/02/22 05:01 PM
2

Men’s main source of stimulation happens to be the foreskin
/r/MensRights21/02/22 04:56 PM
2

The foreskin is even more sensitive than the glans (tip)
/r/MensRights21/02/22 02:50 PM
3

Inform yourself a little better, please https://youtu.be/0vI_4PZTkME
/r/MensRights21/02/22 02:48 PM
3

Urologists deal with women too
/r/MensRights20/02/22 03:51 PM
1

Aaahh friendly fire!!! Seriously man! Have you read Brandon Marotta’s book “The Intactivist Handbook”? In it, there’s a bit called “Unconscious Needs”. Seems like you’re trying to satisfy one such need here. You’re actually putting people off intactivism. I have no doubt you’re a very talented individual, and have done a lot, but belittling other people’s efforts and insulting them does nothing for the movement. If you want to talk further PM me.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 04:23 PM
3

Come on man, there are subreddits full of masochists that get circumcised to lose their capability to feel pleasure. And hey, it works! Check it out r/humandildo (NSFW)
/r/MensRights30/01/22 05:35 PM
3

Here’s what’s going on in dad’s mind: https://en.intactiwiki.org/wiki/Adamant_father_syndrome
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 05:11 PM
2

Sex is better with the whole set of nerve endings, and that’s reason enough to stop cutting baby boys routinely.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 05:04 PM
1

I don’t have death-grip syndrome. And I didn’t say circumcision makes you less horny, I said the horniness remains the same. Fucking and masturbating both are diminished experiences because of circumcision. You jerk off without lube…watch out for death-grip syndrome, and yeah a foreskin would’ve helped with that, and it also would’ve made it worthwhile and not just a means to achieve an orgasm.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 04:16 PM
1

The focus on orgasms is mostly a thing for circumcised guys, because the nerve endings that would’ve helped us enjoy getting there are gone. Yes, men are supposed to actually be melting in pleasure from initial penetration all the way to the fireworks…I’m not trying to make you feel bad about it, but it’s inevitable, it’s the reason we should stop circumcising our sons.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 04:06 PM
13

No, sex drive is not affected by circumcision. You’ll still want it. But it foes make it a diminished experience. You can’t take 80% of the nerve endings associated with pleasure and not have a diminished experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 05:39 AM
8

You say you are not pro-circumcision, and then go on to mention the supposed health benefits. How are we to interpret that? Circumcision in newborns should be as debatable as any other needless surgery on newborns.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 09:08 PM
10

Pro-circumcision fetishist
/r/MensRights02/01/22 08:22 PM
5

Thank you :)
/r/MensRights02/01/22 07:56 PM
9

Yes it’s a double edged sword. And proponents of MGM are trying to legalize FGM type 1a and b, for the sake of equality. Better not to cut I say.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 08:18 PM
2

You dog! Keep those magical foreskin experiences coming. People need to hear them.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 04:31 PM
15

That phrase can only come from a place where cutting the foreskin is the norm Edit: some of the guys at r/ForeskinPleasure would disagree with that phrase
/r/MensRights16/12/21 03:37 AM
3

Exactly!
/r/MensRights26/11/21 09:49 PM
12

It happened to over 100 million guys in the US. Where’s the outcry?
/r/MensRights26/11/21 08:13 PM
5

It’s just a bit of skin, they say
/r/MensRights26/11/21 06:10 PM
5

Glad you found it
/r/MensRights21/11/21 06:44 PM
3

Brian Morris is not a medical doctor, therefore all his publications in medical related topics are not to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 12:59 AM
4

Yet, the frenulum is excised in about 3/4 of all newborn circumcisions
/r/MensRights10/11/21 03:28 AM
9

Damage to the urethra is caused by severing the frenular artery that supplies the meatus causing meatal stenosis. Also, the instrument used to separate the foreskin from the glans can occasionally cause damage to the urethra if the circumciser is not careful.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 03:24 AM
14

Without skin, there’s no sexual stimuli. The foreskin happens to be the most sensitive part of the penis. Circumcision -like FGM- prevents sexual pleasure to the point where it doesn’t affect reproduction.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 03:19 AM
2

If it’s a personal choice tu cut one body part, it should be the same for all others.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 10:30 PM
2

I am against victim culture, to the same degree that I’m against non-therapeutic circumcision. This is not the first time I read something like this. There’s no need for circumcision on a newborn, I do think it is a genuine men’s rights issue and thank guys that make posts like this one to raise awareness.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 12:51 PM
2

You can also be circumcised + raped
/r/AntiFeminists30/09/21 12:19 PM
21

You’ve got it all wrong. It was your attitude towards being intact that ruined your chances. You believed what the cutting culture in the US told you about your body. Now you get to have a taste of the other side, and it’s not greener. You should’ve expanded a little bit more on why circumcision made you feel even more insecure.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 03:50 PM
14

But male genital mutilation would’ve died out if it weren’t for the string of people from cutting religions that kept on pinning diseases to the foreskin all to this day.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 01:20 PM
13

You said it all!
/r/MensRights17/09/21 07:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter