TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

byecyclehelmet Archive

View 2 posts and 39 comments by byecyclehelmet on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It's not the literal meaning being used. It's another word for 'whipped', perhaps more extreme. Feminists already don't look into what Mens Rights movements are.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 06:03 PM
5

Cuckolding is a fetish, yes, but it's much more than that. It's the act of having sex with someone else's lover and preventing that someone else from doing the same with his/her lover. It's been around for centuries in name alone. 'Cuck' was used as far back as 2015. Sometimes something just works too well to describe something to not use it.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 02:25 PM
2

I didn't make those claims. You were claiming that these things DID happen. I asked you to prove it. Turns out, all along, you were just Stalin... You have failed to meet standard criteria. You'd think people'd be eager to prove themselves right, but I guess not. Goodbye.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 09:19 PM
2

You need to prove that capitalism is the cause of the downfall of the soviet union, to even get your foot through the door, and yet you waffle on, despite repeated requests, and you won't provide ANYTHING, instead calling me the villain, and that I need to prove something. If you don't provide concrete sources in your next response, I win. You have no way to counter me, and since you don't, you have lost the argument. You don't have any, do you? Prove me wrong, then.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 09:09 PM
2

EVERYTHING needs a source. If you want to convince someone of anything, you need a source. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 08:54 PM
2

You've got to be joking. Give me sources. You can state your opinion a billion times, but if you don't give me sources, it's meaningless.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 08:47 PM
2

None of those statements are true. You disregard what I say based on lies that you can't even source. Before I'm completely sick of you, would you please answer two yes or no questions? Yes you would. Okay, in order: Do you think that capitalists (the USA is apparently a synonym here, according to you, not part of the question, though) are the villains, and Stalin was a good and honest man and a victim to their hatred? Are you a communist? I'm getting eager to take you out of the picture that is…
/r/MensRights13/08/17 08:36 PM
2

Let me know when that happens, comrade. Maybe by then, you'll answer my questions.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 08:24 PM
2

Oh, so a famine JUST SO HAPPENED to strike just when communism happened? Mmhmm? Again, sources to even begin to be considered relevant. And nothing biased. Historical sources, at worst second hand. Stalin did murder, in the same way Hitler did, millions of people. This is a fact as much as the sky is blue. Of course, you'd think it red. Why do you defend communism to the point of straight denial, going against Ockham's razor, Newton's flaming laser sword, and actually addressing all that's been …
/r/MensRights13/08/17 08:03 PM
1

Because it's trendy to be commie. Look, being a hippie doesn't get you anywhere. The pendulum is swinging the other way. Wait another generation with that shit. You've had like 1 ½ generations of leftist bullshit. Again, even if everyone thinks capitalism is unsustainable, it doesn't make it so. Prove that it actually is unsustainable. Refute the arguments I have made throughout this exchange. That's the only way to prove yourself right.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 07:05 PM
2

"You're a violent, drunken, moronic, dangerous, murderous psychopath who cuts men's dicks off for fun." As a great Doctor once ordered: You provided just as many citations as I did.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 07:02 PM
2

You sound like you're in denial. Both Göbler and Kübler. When I push on it, you get angry, and then you try to bargain yourself out of it, which is something the internet usually lets you do, unfortuately. Otherwise you'd become temporarily melancholic about the situation before accepting reality, which is a fate that's the least terrible you could possibly have.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 07:00 PM
2

Ever heard of a little chap called Stalin? He killed more people than Hitler, but somehow, the ideology that drove him to do this is still acceptable to associate with, apparently, while it's not okay to be a nazi. Do you really think that it was just Stalin as a person who caused the genocides? Or was it the time and place he was born into? When you can, you will. You're arguing for communism and against capitalism by bringing up elitism? Are you out of your mind? You livin' in 3017, as the nor…
/r/MensRights13/08/17 06:46 PM
2

Well, prove me wrong, then. Not to mention that that's not really accurate to what I wrote.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 06:08 PM
2

You're useless until you actually respond to what I wrote, the full meaning of it, instead of just cherrypicking bits and pieces of whatever best fits your agenda and you can most easily argue against. You are a straw crow, I think. Why? Because you're straw manning me, and you won't recognise that you actually are, instead just invoking /r/iamverysmart or similar without actually responding to the statement, which is quite hypocritical. Of course, now that I've addressed that, your reaction wil…
/r/MensRights13/08/17 05:28 PM
2

The killings are for a purpose. There is no way of getting what you want right away. You have to make strategic compromises at every step. Fighting communism will make sure that their prisoners and people (same thing in communism) starve, sure, but that wasn't the reason they fought communism. It was to remove communism. The purpose was never to kill civilians. As I said, compromises are the only way forward, and civilians will get under the line of fire sometimes. That's not the fault of capita…
/r/MensRights13/08/17 01:51 PM
1

Pizdu, tovarishch! Idiota kapitalismi! Perhaps you should consider the other side, read up on Mr. Stalin, before you denounce capitalism as an evil virus spawn of satan? Perhaps on the story of Vladimir Komarov, or any of the other atrocities committed under communism. The problem isn't found at the bottom of a 'no true Scotsman' fallacy, nor is it that anyone else has ruined the day before your beloved commies had a chance to somehow make everything better by having the government rule everythi…
/r/MensRights12/08/17 11:00 PM
1

North Korea is a country with very few resources and a shit ton of hungry, brainwashed, uneducated people. 25 million. about 250% of my country's population, and half that of South Korea. South Korea couldn't handle all these people in their country, and they'd have pretty much nowhere else to go. They can't really travel, so they'd just become the weird slums in the north of Korea.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 05:02 PM
3

Woah. Them 'nastics. It wasn't a natural famine. It was a communist one. The soviet leaders did it, not the US. And don't equate 'the west' to 'the US'. They are not the same.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 04:59 PM
4

The U.S. has focused on having a giant military for most of modern history. They had to go to war in Korea, or NK, and by proxy, the Soviets, would've captured the entire peninsula. There would be no tech innovators like Samsung, LG, etc. (the brands of two of my three monitors at my desk right now), and instead of just part of the peninsula being under a dictatorship, the entire fucking thing would be, perhaps letting the Soviet union live on to this day.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 01:26 PM
2

I don't think North Korea is a threat. They've been doing this shit for decades. Remember when they did this in 2013? Or all the times before then? They're full of shit. There won't be a war, and if there was one, Trump could issue an executive command to bomb the shit out of them with a single nuke.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 01:20 PM
44

That's fucking sick. Next time it'll be castration.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 10:48 PM
1

Watch and see how gets treated as a perpetrator when he's actually a victim. We can't just sit back and moan at what's already happened.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 11:55 AM
19

So the quotes on the facebook pages are real! Great stuff. I like this woman a lot more now. She's awesome. This GIF loops quite well as an infinite rant. :P
/r/MensRights24/05/17 03:06 PM
2

I agree with you, though. :)
/r/MensRights14/03/17 05:01 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/4vcxd0/almost_all_men_are_stronger_than_almost_all_women/
/r/MensRights13/03/17 08:09 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/4vcxd0/almost_all_men_are_stronger_than_almost_all_women/
/r/MensRights13/03/17 08:07 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/4vcxd0/almost_all_men_are_stronger_than_almost_all_women/
/r/MensRights13/03/17 08:05 PM
6

Also this: https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/4vcxd0/almost_all_men_are_stronger_than_almost_all_women/
/r/MensRights13/03/17 08:03 PM
5

Coincidentally*
/r/MensRights13/03/17 08:01 PM
3

I think that's the idea.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 05:19 PM
1

One doesn't have an obligation to perform CPR, and even if someone does, and fails, that person has tried to save the other person's life. CPR isn't very effective, anyway. So, by default, if that is the law, a lot of innocent people will be sent to jail because they didn't do the cooking by the book! It's just ridiculous. All of this.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 02:43 PM
1

You respond to my comment as though you disagree with it, yet you don't. :P
/r/MensRights13/12/16 09:40 PM
2

I never said anything about that. I said that if some meddling cunts take it to trial, and it is clear that there was consent, and one wasn't any type of authority over the other, such as teacher or so, then it's not rape. Not at all. I don't even believe in statuatory rape. It's not rape. Nobody was raped. If someone, even if young, decides he/she wants to have sex with someone, it is that person's choice. It's none of anyone else's business. Comparing the reasoning of a minor to someone who's …
/r/MensRights09/12/16 12:18 PM
2

A good share, I'd estimate 20%, of Swedes, lose their virginity at 13. Mostly just to people their age, about 12-15.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 12:01 PM
3

If no there is no harm, why foul?
/r/MensRights08/12/16 10:00 PM
4

and minors simply lack the reasoning and experience to give informed consent at that age. That is just nothing but a huge, unfair generalisation, and it puts young people at a disadvantage.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 08:47 PM
-1

It's fucking sick. I mean, the AoC is 15 where I live, and in Spain, Germany, Austria, Portugal, Czech Republic, etc iirc it's <=14.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 08:45 PM
1

because teachers are not allowed to have sex with students. It is considered rape if one of the people involved is under the care of another involved. Teacher, parent, step-parent, what have you.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 08:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter