TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

c4ptnh00k Archive

View 1 posts and 29 comments by c4ptnh00k on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
190

Feminismc4ptnh00k/r/MensRights06/09/22 03:48 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
82

Says no brave or courageous men in the show. This is what we can expect from modern feminists who appropriate the media for their own agenda.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 04:00 PM
5

A good marriage is hard to come by in today's gynocentric climate. A large portion of us get it wrong. I did the first time around. I think they key point to take away from this is to go into any relationship with a healthy self value and don't be swindled by your dates self value. Be demonstrably worth it and expect the same. Poonany isnt legal tender so they better have more than that. And NEVER trust any decisions 1hr b4 or after you nut. You'll be fine.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 06:18 PM
6

My point was that if you want to look at gender disparities, maybe look at the more serious ones. I showed you the stats, the disparity is against men when it comes to violence. If you want to live your life in fear because of being murdered by a serial killer that statistically is less likely than you winning the lottery, then go for it. However don't come in here with a weak argument about gender disparity. Female privilege is real. Men don't get to choose. A man can be raped, then made to pay…
/r/MensRights09/08/22 01:46 PM
19

The last time I saw anyone tell a female sexual assault victim that "at least you weren't murdered" they were crucified. What do you think? Are you willing to go there? Also, let's go back to the numbers and see how much more unlikely it is to be murdered in general rather than assaulted. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States Just remember I was pointing out that it's simply a bad argument to use correlation. If we all did this then civil rights in general would probably rol…
/r/MensRights09/08/22 12:53 AM
2

It's fine. There are several women and men alike I wouldn't piss on even if they were on fire.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 11:20 PM
24

I think statistically being kidnapped and murdered by a serial killer is far less likely than what your statement implies. The correlation argument has too many holes as well. No point in having the male qualifier. Statistically speaking women are more likely to be abusers. https://news.ufl.edu/archive/2006/07/women-more-likely-to-be-perpetrators-of-abuse-as-well-as-victims.html#:~:text=Fifty%2Dfour%20percent%20of%20respondents,versus%2050%20percent%20of%20males. I also think accepting any amoun…
/r/MensRights08/08/22 11:17 PM
7

Sure it's a negotiation like EVERYTHING is, but not a transaction. If I'm not making her feel cherished, then she's probably not in the mood. Likewise if I'm feeling disrespected then I'm not giving her any. (Book- "love and respect") My wife can only run on E for so long, you have to fill up the love tank at some point. Some women feel cherished when their husband buys them things while others like acts of service(chores). My wife's language is words of affirmation. (Book - "the 5 love language…
/r/MensRights07/08/22 04:04 AM
10

But that wasn't your argument. Your argument was that raising a child costs more than child support. The guy gave you his real life experience and showed how that was not true. You should be supporting the fact that this man has his shit together and advocate for more in this situation to do the same.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:34 PM
13

I felt so much better after losing 150 lbs. It was always dragging me down. Made me feel like i was locked in a vicious cycle of satisfying vices followed by long and difficult recoveries. After I dropped all that weight my self esteem was so much better that I actually applied for the job I was afraid i wasn't qualified for. A few years later I even made it to the next tax bracket. It was an expensive process, took a lot out of me... Divorcing that cheating whore was one of the best financial d…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:25 PM
68

"I have a headache" actually
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:28 AM
2

anal? Jesus Leave the big guy out of this lol. Also, it's far more grandiose in porn than in reality. A LOT of work imo. Condoms for either though not or 👍
/r/MensRights25/06/22 04:00 AM
9

Feminists have been trying to gain influence by aligning with the civil rights movement since the beginning. This is the best advice I've seen.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 02:36 PM
6

Probably an unpopular opinion, but I think some level of consent to initiate is implied in marriage/sexually active couples. However, it can be revoked without being retroactive. Couples don't consent for each act individually. Instead they consent to a sexual relationship and reserve the right to revoke at anytime. Reminder this is just my personal opinion. No legal knowledge is implied or offered.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 12:04 AM
1

'#MenToo'
/r/MensRights24/05/22 02:20 AM
1

because history was derived from a greek word “historia” which means to inquire into or knowledge acquired by investigation.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 12:59 PM
1

Lobbying for protection of male reproductive rights. As a MRA I think we need to stop wating time addressing neo-feminists and spend more time fighting to get male reproductive rights laws on the books.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 01:15 PM
3

I agree that religion should have no part in the legislation process and I claim no religious affiliation. With that out of the way, your argument overly generalized the basis that commenter was saying. There are in fact things that religious groups have been right about. Making religion and logic mutually exclusive is just lazy. There are a lot of things "science" or "religion" can't answer. So yes stay curious and don't make "science" your replacement for a god. Theories are just that, theorie…
/r/MensRights08/04/22 12:41 AM
11

There is a politician here in Alabama that is running a campaign ad where she uses this phrase... it's killing me slowly every day.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 08:54 PM
1

TIL what vexatiously means...
/r/MensRights28/01/22 04:11 AM
1

Ignore me I miss read the post
/r/MensRights23/01/22 06:02 PM
1

I think many men see lesbians in any form, masculine/feminine, are less a threat to their masculinity than gay men. And so they bolster those stereotypes.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 03:49 PM
3

I take this as, being a link to a statistic that over the years it has been measured that women have more unsafe outcomes than men. This could very well be true and seems to be void of opinion. But that's just my take.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 03:10 AM
3

I'm not seeing this article saying anything of the sort... it doesn't actually mention seatbelts are less effective for da boobies anywhere and the linked statistic is just that, a statistic. I'm anti-feminist anti-woke but just don't see it here. Article was poorly written imo
/r/MensRights22/01/22 02:53 AM
10

So I can't tell if this an argument for or against eating ass lol
/r/MensRights11/01/22 06:53 PM
1

Lol the civil rights movement is literally that. It's not law it's a group of ideals. Some were great, others are still being worked on. But maybe before you decide who or what I am get a clue. If I say I believe in a system of government that is involved as little as possible in the market or social constructs what am I? You sure have flipped a switch and have gone from reasonable to purely triggered. Show me where, anywhere, saying I can't have my own group of guys only working out. Show me on…
/r/MensRights28/12/21 11:49 PM
1

"Exclusionary groups by definition infringe on someone else's freedom." I disagree. There is no right to be included nor is there a right to not be offended. I don't see a middle ground on this topic. "A certain amount of oppression is acceptable, the minimum necessary to keep an ordered society, to keep the society going long in to the future and prevent social breakdown" a lot to unpack here. 1. Oppression. My definition I'm going with is "prolonged cruel or unjust treatment or control." Again…
/r/MensRights28/12/21 11:01 PM
1

In your first example I personally don't see an issue with this. As far as sustainability, I don't see where that's my concern. If that group infringes on someone else's right to life or freedom then they should be punished. That's it and not until. We can't go around punishing folks for offending you. Yes I was outlining private associations but I think "protected" characteristics is hypocrisy. Say I'm a religious minority trans person. Why do you care. It's none of your business and if I want …
/r/MensRights28/12/21 05:52 PM
1

Protected characteristics? These are only used for legal matters not individual opinion/choice of association. Are you suggesting that there should be legal action taken against a man wanting to work out only with other men? Diversity is not a universal solution, it's a solution but rarely relevant. "Letting segregated places pop up" once again this implies there should be action taken up if you notice a group of men who only invite other men over... just saying that's some serious fascism... bu…
/r/MensRights28/12/21 05:12 PM
1

Pretty big difference in forced and voluntary segregation. Everyone should have the right to choose who they interact with.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 08:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter