TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

cain8708 Archive

View 0 posts and 141 comments by cain8708 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
15

"Tell anyone and you're fired". That's a direct quote from the clip. There is no feeling each other out like you put it. There is a power dynamic, no consent, and people are laughing while she says this.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 11:53 PM
1

Thats called alimony. Child support isn't supposed to feed the mom, it's not supposed to clothe the mom, it's not supposed to buy her more comfortable shoes to wear. That money is supposed to go 100% towards the child.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 09:48 AM
3

By your logic just because a court said some did commit a rape doesn't mean they actually did though. So in the end there isn't any hope for the justice system no matter the outcome because everyone can just say "this doesn't prove anything" no matter how strong the evidence is.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 10:09 AM
19

This is what I came for. The article was some hot garbage.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 12:40 AM
1

Thats how the VA is supposed to work. The C.H.O.I.C.E program is supposed to allow vets that can't get an appointment within 2 weeks, I think, to be able to go see a civilian provider. The number of people that use the program is supposed to also be tracked and resources are supposed to be sent out accordingly. I only have a VA clinic, but we got an Orthopedic specialist last year. In reality you're only offered the program if it's specialty appointments and it's your first time having that kind…
/r/MensRights21/03/22 01:11 AM
1

Oh I never said I love the VA in any of these comments. I have no love for the VA. The time they found a tumor on me but didn't want to do anything until I almost needed a transplant. Or the surgeries I had and they messed up the billing so the hospital ended up sending me the bills instead. I would then have to figure where to send the bills, go to the hospital and have them send the bills to the correct spot. By the way under federal law it's illegal for vets to get these said bills but that's…
/r/MensRights21/03/22 12:01 AM
1

So you know about the C.H.O.I.C.E program in the VA, the federal laws that exist that force the VA to send vets to civilian doctors if there isn't a VA facility close enough to them at no cost, and all the other stuff about the VA? Call me impressed. It's rare for someone that doesn't use the VA, let alone someone outside the country, to know how the VA compares and contrasts to other Healthcare systems and can boldly claim what it is and isn't. You'd be surprised at the number of vets that have…
/r/MensRights20/03/22 11:04 PM
1

I dont think you understand VA Healthcare. It's supposed to be universal Healthcare. Source: am vet on 100% disability and still have issues with the VA as far as getting seen, getting medical bills paid, etc.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:11 PM
44

There are 2 linked articles in the OP link of females reporting false rape allegations and getting arrested for that. I mean with doing additional zero clicking there are 3 times it happened. How many times should something happen before you say "OK that's a prpblem"? If 3 rapes happened would you still say "that doesn't mean it happens frequently"?
/r/MensRights08/03/22 09:54 PM
24

I guess I'm confused here. So men should share with women, but not share too much. They should go find other people they could share things with. Since its not clear what should and shouldn't be shared with the significant other and what should be shared with the friend I'm sure there won't be complaints, and articles written, of women complaining men who try to follow this are now sharing too much with their friends that they've made. "Yea I wanted them to talk to other people besides me but I …
/r/MensRights15/11/21 12:15 PM
23

Why does it have to be a women's issue though? If a guy has a problem making friends then that's something he needs to work on. If the person he is dating is saying "I don't want you to make friends and only talk to me" that's a toxic relationship and a huge red flag. If it goes a step further and it's now "emotional labour" then not only is that some bullshit but clearly someone isn't ready to be I'm the grown up world. Seriously. It says "I want you to share some stuff but not too much because…
/r/MensRights15/11/21 11:49 AM
1

But what should I be opening a dictionary for? You misspelled a word? I can't look up a word you fucked up. And you were clearly talking about a rifle. But that's not what you said. You said a sniper. So what in the dictionary am I supposed to look up? Clearly there is a tree you should be apologizing to for wasting its oxygen that it works so hard to produce.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 06:07 AM
1

As a medic that has been on the line, and with a scout platoon, I'm asking you what the fuck an "anti-materiel" rifle is. I mean you're talking about a "generation destroyed by videogaming" but you can't spell or use simple grammar for shit. So enlighten me on what this "anti-materiel sniper" is supposed to be. I would love to know. What weapon do I not know about? I mean surely you can't be talking out your ass and doing me the honor of giving me the enjoyment of commenting to me? Me someone th…
/r/MensRights30/10/21 06:04 AM
2

What the fuck are you going on about child? Did you seriously misspell the word "material" in your retarded post? Describe to me what an "anti-materiel" sniper is? A "sniper" is a person. So a "anti-materiel" person? Lord, please help this child. They know not their retarded ways. Please give them at least one brain cell so they may at least have something in there when they get skull fucked by their own stupidity. Amen.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 12:58 AM
1

I literally quoted you from comments you have sent to me. I have no idea how to be anymore on point with the thread than that. When you are refusing to even acknowledge your own direct comments that shows you're not even here to have a discussion. You ask me to quote you, I do, and then have the nerve to act like you never said those things.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 02:46 AM
1

Your first comment was "asking for support and blaming men are two different things" and you replied to someone talking about feminism. Are we to assume you were talking about supporting......the automobile industry? "Its easy to say men don't care". Those are your words not mine. I specified what kind of feminism I support. 100% equality. And all you said was "there is a lot wrong with this" after you copied and pasted that part. No elaboration, no discussion, nothin. Just telling me I'm wrong …
/r/MensRights09/09/21 05:46 PM
1

You're calling this sub a circle jerk. So asking about similar subs isn't whataboutism. It's checking for a bias. Ya know, the thing thry cover in peer-reviewed research papers? I guess asking that from you is too much since when I pointed out specific posts in this sub you asked what it had to do with anything. If I bring up stuff specifically going on with this sub you say it's off topic. If I compare this sub to similar ones you say it's whataboutism. So how would one go about this conversati…
/r/MensRights09/09/21 07:38 AM
3

So you haven't seen the news articles of female teachers sexually students but its called "inappropriate relationships". Articles about male genital mutilation. Yes this sub has many posts from users telling subjective stories. If this sub is a circle jerk, please tell me how you feel about the sub femaledatingstrategy or 2X chromosome. When I, a male, first joined reddit 2X was a default sub. A sub where a rule was "you can be banned for being a male commenter". That's not whataboutism. You are…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 10:12 PM
1

I'm gonna have to disagree there. The right to have jobs, vote, etc weren't the same for women as men. This shouldn't be debated. How the US treated drunk driving and domestic violence decades ago is vastly different from now.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 10:25 AM
14

Caring and asking for support are two different things. Someone can care about an issue and hold the different viewpoint. If a male thinks "abortion is wrong" they still care about the issue. Hell they still support the issue. Just not the way originally intended. The question becomes "should their opinion now matter?". There are women that are against abortion too. It's rather telling to use a broad brush and assume "all women are for abortion" and that men should support said women. Men could …
/r/MensRights07/09/21 05:15 AM
4

She got the privilege of an easy court. Imagine shooting someone and the excuse is "they stole from me and I didnt have an easy life". I've had things stolen from me, my father physically and sexually abused me when I was a small child. The entire family on his side still thinks I made the entire thing up. So can I take a gun and shoot the person who took some of the stuff from me?
/r/MensRights26/10/20 05:02 AM
3

That kinda sounds like an excuse though. "We aren't going to do any of that real court stuff. We have other real important stuff to do."
/r/MensRights26/10/20 04:40 AM
5

"He'd stolen or 'misplaced' something she'd written which was important to her". Is that all the reason people need to shoot someone?
/r/MensRights26/10/20 03:34 AM
2

"Until we can bring down men's hours we need to reward women." I really dont see how giving women a shorter work week will help this issue. The slack will have to be picked up somewhere. Me thinks it will be by the people still at work. Ya know. The males.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 08:52 AM
1

Eh. I dislike the idea of "most feminists are X". Its no different from "most men are X" or most MRAs are X". If I dont like being painted with a broad brush then why should I paint others with a broad brush? Can I find absolute shit feminists? Hell yea I can. Can I find absolute shit men? Absolutely. That doesnt mean I'm gonna judge the rest of the genders by the shit people I find.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 12:58 AM
3

My advice is great in theory. In reality its little better than signs telling people to stop abusing their spouses. They know it's wrong on some level, but they've found some way to justify it.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 05:17 AM
16

Ask your mom what would she do if you were in an abusive relationship. Because what shes teaching you is to stay silent and "take it like a man" by not getting help at programs. I imagine her tune will change when she knows the victim.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 02:38 AM
-1

Because the justification is risk. If the only factor was males were charged higher than females then the states where gender discrimination is illegal they wouldnt be able to do that. But since they do that based on having to pay out on more male accidents, and charge based on other factors, it's not discrimination based on gender. And as someone else pointed out to me sex is only federally protected under employment.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 02:57 PM
1

Ah. My bad. Sex falls under protected class with employment.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 02:41 PM
1

Its justified by risk. Different age brackets pay different costs, different car or bike types pay different costs. If you're single you pay more. Males statistically get into more accidents when they are younger. So it's not just gender.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 02:35 PM
69

You spelled United States wrong. Gender is a protected class. Meaning treating one differently, like say forcing one gender to pay a much higher cost for the same item, is super illegal under federal law. Same thing would apply if the club did this only with race. It's just a matter of someone getting a lawyer to see the ticket difference, buying a ticket, and then saying "I was forced to pay a different price due to gender." Suddenly the price would change. If its male or female price that chan…
/r/MensRights30/10/19 03:40 AM
1

So you think CNN has adept speakers when it comes to right wing topics, and gives all speakers equal speaking time and doesnt cut off the person that is the person representing the right wing side? It's not just what topics they cover but how do they treat the topic they are covering. Do they present a fair and unbiased viewpoint? Or do they intentionally make one side look flustered, unorganized, and cut them off when they are making a rebuttal.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 08:12 PM
1

I think it depends on where we push back at. And let me explain. In this case do I think people (men, feminists, trans, any gender) should file a report for what this person said? Absolutely. They feel it falls under hate speech that's the people who would handle law breaking. Complaining with the news agency? Not so much. I truly believe in freedom of speech. I want to see articles like this, from KKK, Black Panthers, Comunist Party, Weathermen, cartel members, serial killers, etc. I dont think…
/r/MensRights09/10/19 10:06 AM
1

Oh. I didnt see any links to anything like that when I made my comment. So then does that mean it doesnt meet the level of hate speech or they just dont care?
/r/MensRights09/10/19 09:09 AM
1

As in filed a complaint with the police or just made a post on reddit? Because those are vastly different things. My comment specified the police report. I havent seen anyone say they tried to file a report and were turned away yet.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 08:47 AM
1

I do agree the word killing makes it much worse than without it. But then it's just a simple question. "Why hasn't anyone who has been threatened by this broad statement made a complaint yet?" Her statement was against, roughly, half the population in Canada. As a US citizen I cant exactly go there a file a complaint. But surely someone there would be able to. So why hasn't anyone? I'm not saying they are lesser people for not filing any. I'm just saying they have the absolute right to file one.…
/r/MensRights08/10/19 10:14 PM
1

I think the context would matter. Where they asking you about your book involving a world without Jews? Or were you there to discuss another topic and you just slipped it in there. Because by the word of law she isnt advocating or promoting. She doesnt say "women go kill men" or promotes the idea that men need to die. Her words are imagine a world without men. Its shitty to say, but that's it. Let's try looking at it from another point of view. I'll pick myself as the subject since it's a touchy…
/r/MensRights08/10/19 04:39 PM
2

That's exactly my point. It doesn't encourage homicide hence she said "and I'm underlining the word imagine three times here". It was specifically so that when someone says shes spreading hate speech she can point to that exact point and say "no I'm not, I'm only saying imagine it I'm not encouraging it." I'm guessing the downvotes are because it looks like I'm defending her.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 06:41 AM
4

Cover your ass. I'm not sure why I'm getting downvoted for pointing out she said it for a legal defense. Literally she can point to it in court when someone says "this falls under hate speech" and she can say "I said imagine it, I didnt say go out and do it or encourage others to do it". Its a super fine line to walk. Let's put it another way. "Let's kill X ethnicity." Sounds super fucking bad. It's pretty much hate speech. Encourages people to go kill. Now try "imagine a world without X ethnici…
/r/MensRights05/10/19 06:27 AM
-4

Because the word imagine is underlined three times. That wasnt in there for shits and giggles. That was pure CYA material.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 03:39 AM
4

It would have to be a major assignment if it's just one assignment doing this. No class is only 100 points, but your work is percentages. All your homework is 15% of your total grade, each exam is 15% of your total grade, etc. So it all comes out to X% is your grade out of 100%. So you can get over 100% on some classes. In high school is AP classes that count more than 4.0. Other classes have started moving towards giving extra credit, bonus questions, so that it's possible to get above a 4.0 in…
/r/MensRights30/09/19 07:36 PM
9

It what the 9 points mean though. A to a B. If she gave him the 2 points for the 100, or if the school and class has the over 4.0 GPA then she might have boosted his GPA after the blackmail sex started. But lowering it to a B just to prove a point of what she can do would hurt his college choices.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 07:27 PM
1

You're right. I'm just gonna call it here. Thanks for that reminder.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 04:42 AM
1

Other than the words 'weasel words' phrases like 'clearly you arent a genius' etc. Nope. Those are clearly loving phrases. How far did you get along in school again? At this point it's clear it wasnt grade school friend.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 03:56 AM
1

Since you started the insults is that your translation of that comment? Because if not we can talk about words like irony.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 03:25 AM
1

No. I gave up on those because clearly you're having such a hard time with simple words, her suspended sentence will be over before you grasp this fucking concept, let alone other points. Yea I did say that. I didnt think I'd have to explain words down to a 5th grade level. I'll try to keep that in mind next time I'm in this sub in case you read the comment. Wouldnt want you saying something stupid like a man was poisoned, when it was actually an overdose.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 03:13 AM
1

You were the one hung up on this being poison though. Or did you suddenly realize that poison doeent fit this and it's only a clickbait title? Because my literal first comment was poison doesnt fit this. It's more of an overdose and you wanted to argue what simple words mean. That one point has been where we started. You know, the part you wanted to try and say I was wrong about?
/r/MensRights25/03/19 02:47 AM
1

I didnt say you quoted me? In your comment you quoted the article with what she was charged with. The crime was poisoning OR using noxious chemicals. Literally you even wrote it out. Hence my statement of 'you even quoted it'. Bruh. I cant dumb this down anymore for you. I find it funny you talk about suicide and reading comprehension. Is that self projecting? I could give you the suicide hotline number. You do you dude. You're the next guy I make a bet on. How retarded can one person be. Everyo…
/r/MensRights25/03/19 02:24 AM
1

I went with the crime she was charged with too, you know the second half of the sentence that you even quoted? It's like all you have is insults because you cant admit youre wrong. It's ok little buddy. Big words can be confusing sometimes. I'm not sure how 'the right dose' are a weasel words. That's literally what an overdose is. Do...do we need to break the words down? Maybe that's where the confusion is! Alright so first you have the word 'over' meaning too much. The 'dose' as in amount. So w…
/r/MensRights25/03/19 01:49 AM
0

Poision definition: a substance that is capable of causing the illness or death of a living organism when introduced or absorbed. Overdose definition: an excessive and dangerous dose of a drug. Now I'm not a genius, but one of those definitions fits. Insulin doesn't cause illness or death of a living organism when introduced or absorbed at the right dose. The charge is poison or noxious chemicals. With noxious being 'harmful'. Fucking crazy I know. They have two options to pick and you go with t…
/r/MensRights25/03/19 12:29 AM
0

What does the article you linked call it the entire time, minus the headline? Fucking overdose. Jesus you remind me of so many patients that come into the ER.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 09:52 PM
-1

How is poison an accurate word? You dont say someone was poisoned with any substance. Heroin, sleep medication, PCP, any drug. The Medical Examiner calls it a Drug Overdose unless it's a substance the body isnt meant to ingest. She wasnt charged with attempted murder to begin with. Pick a damn argument. Either he was 'poisoned' and they charged her weak, which the judge clearly isnt putting up with bullshit, or the title is bullshit. Another possibility is they couldnt charge her with attempted …
/r/MensRights24/03/19 01:09 PM
-2

I dont agree with a few things here. Overdose would be a better word I think, not poison. When it came down to MJ and his doctor it wasnt a question of poison but of overdose. The judge specifically states they dont buy any of the bullshit the defendant says. They specifically call out using the alcohol as a weak thing to say, and state the husband doesnt want her to go to jail. Judge says while the court doesnt have to follow this they do take victim's statements into account. I'm not sure why …
/r/MensRights24/03/19 05:55 AM
1

This is what I was thinking. Guy was arrested and in jail for two months for essentially a domestic violence charge. It's not like she picked up a knife and thought his chest was the placeholder. If a male was abused, and then stabbed his abuser, I would hope the cries for his sentence wouldnt be this loud. In before replies "then she shouldnt have taken him back if it was that bad".
/r/MensRights26/02/19 04:01 AM
1

You're still leaving out your racist part. It's cool though. I'll just pick it up and make sure it gets put in. When the city feels the need to publicly apologize about it (due to racism) maybe racism played a part. If you're hell bent on saying it didnt, maybe you're a racist piece of shit. I dunno.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 03:49 PM
1

My bad. I misread what you posted. I thought that was the link I requested that you said you would provide, but it wasnt. Remember, the part where a bunch of whites went shooting up a black neighborhood in the article and you said you would provide a neighborhood of an opposite race if I provided a single article of a woman being prosecuted for false rape claims. I thought what you sent was the race reversal link.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 07:06 PM
0

...did you read your own article? They were accused by other men of killing and trafficking organs and were set on fire. Three other men falsely accused them, got the town up the a frenzy, and killed the men. Not women. But holy fuck, I dont know how someone can be this dense. Look guy, you take care. You are literally the only one that doesnt see it as racism by the way. If you read the article in the original thread, the city itself calls it racist, the writer does, but I'm sure you know bette…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 03:59 PM
1

...did you read the article? One of the suspects this woman accused was sleeping under a tree when a group of men shot him over 400 times. But sure, it's because he was a man. So all I need is a single woman going to jail for making a false accusation? https://apnews.com/47524e930a434068a819bc0cd4646b38 https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-wales-45839644 https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiKlNrnsu7fAhVO-qwKHWWXD9oQzPwBegQIARAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.usatod…
/r/MensRights14/01/19 11:15 PM
1

This happened in 1949. A few years before that All Black units were still used as meat shields on the front lines in WW2. Nah, I'm sure a white guy would have gotten shot over 400 times by an angry mob as well. Find me a time when a small neighborhood was terrorized by other citizens via being shot at, set ablaze that took days to get under control. Not a riot, a targeted attack on one community.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 02:11 PM
0

I doubt a white neighborhood would have been terrorized like that, a white man shot over 400 times by a lynch mob. That's just the number that hit the body, that doesnt include the number of rounds fired. Considering the posse was like over 100 people, they were out for murder for the word "rape". A former FBI agent goes to testify stating the prosecution and local police fabricated evidence to convict, I highly doubt it's for the gender portion and more along the lines of why they had an all wh…
/r/MensRights13/01/19 02:18 PM
1

I agree it contradicts it. But you lost me on that last bit. I think the believe all women thing is fucking retarded. I'm just saying that I dont think this case was more about race than gender.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 09:54 AM
1

Does this really belong here? I mean, its rage filled and horrible, dont get me wrong. But it's less "mens rights" and more "full blown racism" to me. Before I get downvoted to Hell, hear me out. Yes the woman lied and that's what set this off. But medical evidence was withheld. I doubt it was because they were males. One suspect was shot 400 fucking times while he was sleeping under a tree. Was it because he was a male, or more because he was African American? Hundreds of people went shooting i…
/r/MensRights13/01/19 08:03 AM
1

Bruh. I'm a dude. But hey, dont let my dick get in the way of you making an ass of yourself.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 11:05 PM
-1

Because it's one thing for the movement to die naturally. Doing this just causes an offshoot and perpetuates the problem. This is LITERALLY what happened when it came to the women's suffrage movement. First it was both women and African Americans. Then just women. The only difference here is how many people agree with today's definition of "inequality" going on with women. This movement even compares themselves to the suffrage movement. When there are multiple groups saying the same thing today …
/r/MensRights30/12/18 10:14 AM
0

You are happy the voices of many people are being stomped out because of a quota. To put this another way, you are happy that many job applications are tossed in the trash simply for a quota.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 09:47 AM
-3

How many posts in this sub, or comments, are about unequal treatment of men? Due to some imaginary quota someone else has drawn a male has suffered. Custody, alimony, job hiring, domestic violence. Yet now you want to be happy because it's happening to a group that's not you. That doesnt make it better. It just makes you just as big of a piece of shit as the people that do it to males.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 09:36 AM
-5

Good thing this sub doesnt want to get upset when someone non qualified gets a job over someone qualified for something like gender.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 09:06 AM
-2

No we shouldnt really. It's no different than saying "we cant hire someone qualified because we need more of X status." Canceling things because it doesnt meet some imaginary status quo is horrible. The voices of people are literally being silenced because some people are butt hurt. If I was part of an organization and they decided to cancel something big because some people decided not to come to an event (that they are free to attend or not) I'd be pissed. This now turns it into a mandatory at…
/r/MensRights30/12/18 08:32 AM
3

Texas doesnt have 2nd degree murder.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/12/18 04:24 AM
1

Then let's say a cop walks up to someone and just gives them a left hook out of no where. We can all agree this is illegal. The issue is the street isnt the place to fight your side of the case because you will lose everytime. You are placing your bets on several things going your way. The first being you can take the cop down. The second being they wont radio for backup. The third being any people walking by saw the punch and arent just seeing you beating on a cop. But let's say all of that goe…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/11/18 06:40 PM
8

So, to start, yes you are right there are times police arrest/detain without actual good reason. That isnt the time to fight back. Because that is literally assaulting a police officer. Detain is not the same thing as arrest mind you. A cop can detain you while they stop you for a speeding ticket, when normally you stay in the car. You fight the arrest in court. Fighting in the street is a literal charge of resisting arrest and assaulting an officer. I mean, let's put your "fight back" into prac…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/11/18 10:30 AM
2

And your first statement was "she isnt entitled to her opinion" even though the statement she made did not meet the requirements for clear and present danger. She didnt state a fact. So on what grounds are you standing on saying she shouldnt be able to say this? You keep bouncing around between people if someone can or cant say something based on if it is fact or not. You simply want to control the flow of information.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/18 06:47 PM
2

But then you are starting off subjective as well. Who decides what is informed and what isnt? Someone who has been in a field for 8 years is more informed than someone in the same field for 4. You seem to also be suggesting that people shouldnt have the right to say the statement "I think" because then the statement would be based on conjecture instead of fact or truth. If people accept anything and everything at face value that is on them. But we shouldnt start regulating what people can and ca…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/18 07:52 AM
1

In the US you need "clear and present danger" met with the statements. Because her statement was so vague (looking at half the population with no specific way to carry out the deed or when to do it) it's no threat. But if it was something like "kill X number of males in Y city by this time tomorrow" then congrats you now have clear and present danger. Even more so if she adds in a weapon type.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/18 07:39 AM
4

You're mixing two different things in your own statement there. Right to an opinion and right to respect said opinion aren't the same thing by a long shot. Example: someone says the love Justin Bieber music. They have every right to say that. I have every right to think of say their music taste is horrible. But I dont have the right to prevent them from saying the love Bieber music and they cant stop me from saying they love bad music. I dont have to agree with them, I dont have to respect them.…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/18 07:29 AM
1

Ah. Thank you kindly!
/r/MensRights20/02/18 01:04 AM
1

What app are you using? On Reddit is fun I got nadda.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 12:35 AM
2

Thank you! How do people know? I'm on mobile so I didn't know until people started telling me.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 09:32 PM
2

Yes they can still talk. But I'm looking at this as if this was an in person conversation. If we do this for most subs, and give the same when replying, we can see the level of respect the person shows. Personal insults, apologies, admitting when wrong, etc. So sure you didn't stop them from talking on an internet forum, I mean it's kind of hard to do that. But saying the same thing in public does prevent them from talking.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 09:19 PM
6

You just summed up why we can't have compromises. You deserve gold my friend.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 08:49 PM
29

You just told someone that silencing men isn't happening, while also commenting in the r/mensrights sub that they shouldn't say anything. Which is silencing them. I'm not sure if you saw the irony in that or not. Regardless of what they said is right or wrong, you literally just did what you said people aren't doing....
/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:14 PM
1

That's what I said. Apparently someone else said I was crazy for thinking this would be a possibility and that it would never happen.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 05:44 AM
1

Right. I'm saying for example, the r/insanepeoplefacebook posts that made it to /all today. People sharing false information about a pill that contained a disease and not to take it. It was shared on a level the government in Singapore had to make 2 separate official statements about it, Snopes did a piece as well. This could be argued as hurting the company significantly. First step would probably be a C&D letter, to stop spreading the false info. Sure we can all agree on that. But what if the …
/r/MensRights22/01/18 03:55 AM
2

You seem to have taken this a little too personal. I'll just end it with this: every court case that has ever been decided, started as a hypothetical. But you saying something tastes bad is purely subjective though. Have a good night.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 03:49 AM
1

While I agree with you, I think there is an issue. Corporations have been ruled to be people. If what you just said became reality, then that would mean corporations could silence people who spoke out negatively about them, without proof. How many companies does Reddit as a collective shit on? Suddenly that company can go to court saying, "what you have doesnt fully prove your accusations. We demand (the comment/site/user) be taken down due to false accusations. Or someone says the same thing ab…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 02:49 AM
2

When you said you hope their kids suffer long and painful deaths.
/r/MGTOW15/12/17 04:51 PM
2

I'm not defending pence. Your comment was you hoped someone who voted for him their kids were tortured. You moved the goal posts from punishing voters to now politicians. Either you are a shit troll, or you need some serious mental help. Either way, you broke the rules.
/r/MGTOW15/12/17 04:01 PM
2

So you want to be more like North Korea. Lol. Great goal.
/r/MGTOW15/12/17 07:44 AM
1

So because you don't like how they voted, their kids should be tortured to death? I wonder how you feel about people who practice different religions or have different sexual preferences than you. Well not really, you clearly have enough in common with bigots and people who kill others just for not being the same as you. No need to further point it out via comments.
/r/MGTOW15/12/17 05:29 AM
1

There is a difference between telling someone not to breed, and saying you hope their kids are fucking tortured. And you're like the pot calling the kettle black by saying someone is a shitty person.
/r/MGTOW15/12/17 05:09 AM
4

I never understood that. Wishing to see the kids of someone you don't like suffering, like being tortured. Does that mean you want Gitmo to increase in numbers, or are you against it existing? You seem to enjoy people getting tortured is all.
/r/MGTOW14/12/17 11:08 PM
2

To be fair though the judge that sentenced the female has given light sentences to both males and females, with several of them from Oxford. So less of because she is a female, and more of he is a shit judge.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 04:21 AM
1

Alright. You're a troll. You have to be. To say there is no such thing as rape, and to want to hold women down and do that shit to them, you have to be a troll. No other thing possible.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 05:14 AM
0

Lol. Your exact words we're "no it wouldn't be rape". Yes it would be. From the dictionary unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim. See where it says foreign object? That would the bat. See where it says without consent? Jesus Christ. I can't tell if you're a troll or what. I have literally trained Afghan soldiers where …
/r/MensRights09/09/17 09:36 PM
1

So you're ok with rape, but at least you're ok with rape with all sexes. That's sick, but at least you're an equal opportunist. I ran across Afghans like you. People who tried to use war as an excuse to fill their sick desires. You would rape anything. Goats, women, men, kids. Anything that still had a pulse. You didn't give two shits. The victims would come to us begging for us to do something, but we would be told we wouldn't be allowed to do anything because you were Afghan, and fell under th…
/r/MensRights09/09/17 09:11 PM
1

they could be forcibly impregnated for the good of the nation. Have you ever heard of artificial insemination? That's still fucking rape. If I stick a bat up your ass without your consent, it's still rape. I know, laws are hard. Killing a group of people "for the good of the nation" is still genocide. Pretty sure the world agreed to that in the 40s. And again, we have yet to use the draft. Why do we need to jump to rape if we have yet to use the system we currently have set up? In reality you ju…
/r/MensRights09/09/17 08:47 PM
1

What question? We have over half the population that can't qualify for the draft due to one health condition alone, and you want to try and justify rape. How can one justify rape? Answer: you never fucking can. But let's hear you answer your own question. Let's hear you justify your own rape question. This'll be good.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 07:28 PM
1

Yet with this .7% growth change we have: maintained a war on two fronts while having bases in Europe and Africa, have an obese population rate of over 30% and overweight rate of 70%, and had a deployment tempo so high it it was at one point shorter than 90 day rest periods. Downvotes don't change the stats. Anyone has yet to justify females being put in the draft, or the need for the draft anymore due to how much of our population is literally unfit to serve to due weight problems alone, and you…
/r/MensRights09/09/17 06:54 PM
0

Right now over 70% of our population is overweight, with 37.9% being obese. Even with that, we are an all volunteer force. We were deployed so often at one point stop loss was activated, people who were getting out of the military weren't allowed to leave. Not to mention back to back deployments with less than 3 months rest. All while fighting a war in 2 countries, bases in Europe and Africa. If it ever gets to a point where we need to actually use the draft, I'd be more concerned about the use …
/r/MensRights09/09/17 06:44 AM
0

I agree with everything you said, except the draft. We haven't implemented the draft in decades, and are currently an all volunteer force.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 05:24 AM
1

Just using the words you did.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 03:13 AM
1

No X is still a charge. You are talking about sentencing, which is a different phase. Just because you did it to a lesser extent doesnt mean you didnt do it. If you do it by money spent, then what i said earlier still stands. The CP is a reusable commodity, so it can be resold without having to have another start up cost to make it, since it is already made. Simply lower the price so you can continue to get away with the crime and have no punishment under the scenario you have painted. Since the…
/r/MensRights08/07/17 11:04 PM
1

It wasnt to me, it was to another person you commented on. I didnt comment to that specific comment because i had already commented on one of yours so i figured commenting on others could be seen as harassment. The problem with having it with value amounts is what happens when the sell price is then just lowered? For example, say we follow your example and set up ranges where under X amount is a charge, Y is a worse, and Z is the harshest. Its not a drug, the CP, and the child, can just be reuse…
/r/MensRights08/07/17 08:03 PM
1

Which goes against an earlier comment you made about you werent mad at her because she didnt do anything really wrong. Hence the amount of backpedaling you have had to do and strawman of bringing up adult pics. First paragraph tells you she was trading. You said you were ok with that. You words, not mine.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 06:51 PM
1

In the article it said she traded it. That would be distribution. So you were saying you werent mad at what she did while not reading the article? I kinda lost any reason to debate with you when you admitted to not reading the article, saying what she did wasnt bad but distribution is bad (one of the things she did), and pretty much a general forceful backpedaling on your comments when people call you out on them because you admit that what this specific person did is bad, but you say she didnt …
/r/MensRights08/07/17 04:27 AM
1

Well the article did say she was also charged with distribution so, isnt that what a "sender" is? Im trying to see your viewpoint as far as defending her, but you keep shooting yourself in the foot.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 11:12 PM
3

So if someone gives away child porn for free, youre cool with it? They arent selling it, or trading it. No exchange of goods are being done. They are simply allowing other people to copy their stash. Thats an interesting way to look at it. I mean, tough shit for the kid that was abused right? But at least their face and abuse will only be on the internet for those people to see. You said that shouldnt be a crime if they dont pay for it or trade for it.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 09:05 PM
4

Then based on what you said the guilty all star shouldnt have gone to prison anyways. If all the evidence consists of is "he said she said" then that doesnt meet the level of "above reasonable doubt" in the court. You said it yourself you were a victim of that exact situation where the only evidence they had was their word. If we started finding people guilty of serious crimes based on words alone, the entire judicial system would collapse. Someone broke into my house and tried to murder me. It …
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/17 03:17 AM
1

I messaged them yesterday, stating that their sub doesnt show up on my feed. I didnt know mensrights was considered a hate sub. That would explain the block, because i also asked what rule did i break or violate to warrant a ban. Im all for owning up to my fuck ups, so if i broke a rule then ill take the ban. But they havent messaged me back yet, and im not going to send repeat messages or try to post in that sub. Thats called "starting shit" in my book since ive been given a ban.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 05:56 PM
1

I think they are the loudest. Example is Snowden and Manning. They arent the standards of the government or the military, but everyone knows who they are.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 02:54 PM
1

I dont think its fair to use the extremes as the labels. There are oxygen thieves in every group. Police, military, politicians, religion, engineers, carpenters, lawyers, you get the idea. Name a group and there is at least one person in it that group that isnt the prime example of "dont be that idiot". But that doesnt mean we should use said idiot as the mascot for the group.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 06:19 AM
1

I messaged the mods of that sub to ask why i was banned, but havent gotten a response yet. I am legitimately curious what i said or did that warranted a ban. What rule was broken, what did i violate? If nothing was violated, then what was the cause? If there is no cause, and it is done simply because i am a male worried about being falsely accused of rape in college, and debating the legality of what any accuser, regardless of their sex creed colour or nationality, could or should face in the ju…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 04:22 AM
1

Its an autoban message. I messaged them about it. It just says the standard cant post there but can read there still. It came 10 mins after i made the above post. Check my history. Nothing has been deleted. I dont even have that sub show up on my feed, so i know for a fact it wasnt because i was shitposting.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 09:21 PM
9

The issue comes up though with college campuses. The male may not get jail time because the school doesnt send the information to police, because they know its nowhere near enough to convict. They have to do things like deny the defendant a lawyer, prevent evidence from being shown, etc. All just to get the defendant guilty according to the lax standards of their board. So the student faces academic suffering, preventing them from finishing college, getting a good job that they hoped for, that c…
/r/MensRights19/05/17 08:32 PM
3

Kinda hard to if they identify as women. When you allow anyone to use whatever pronoun they want, shit is gonna get a little weird. One guy has his as "his royal highness" at his college because they have the same rules. The second the city picks the definition of "women", and who to exclude, the LGBTQIA+ will handle the fight alone. Thatll be one fight the city will realize they done goof'd on real god damn quick. So either they already know about this landmine, and when a parent tries this the…
/r/MensRights01/05/17 02:45 AM
3

Isnt this the same city that passed a law about using proper pronouns when told what they are, or face a fine? https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/05/17/you-can-be-fined-for-not-calling-people-ze-or-hir-if-thats-the-pronoun-they-demand-that-you-use/ Just sayin, if the kid or parent says they are to be called a female, they better be or that shit is illegal on a few fronts.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 06:08 AM
6

Because reddit doesnt like her and its the easy target. Want a karma post? Make something anti trump. Easy multi gold right now is a post shitting on united AND trump. She said something students are demanding, suddenly its a huge problem and is bad. Im willing to bet my comment was screenshot, sent somewhere, and i will be called a racist, bigot, etc.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 05:25 PM
9

So how many links do you want of students asking for segregated areas on campus? Segregated dorms and buildings, to be kept away from white students. Guess which party they support, give you a hint, Bernie was their hero.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 02:55 PM
2

Making a single comment is now painting someone in a good light? Id hate to see what you define as evidence. But hey, you call the US shitstains, yet all you can do is think about the US. So what does that make you, exactly? Definitely not something better when all you can do is some weak ass insults and focus on the US. You come off as some envious person, and for that i laugh. But hey you hate us cause you aint us. Now go back to your play things while the rest of us have actual conversations.…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/17 10:47 PM
2

Well, when you start accusing people randomly, dont get upset if they do the same. Yours were wrong, as were mine. Shocking i know. Its almost as if you know nothing about each other and pulled random shit out of our ass. Only difference is you continue to do it. Kinda looks like youre compensating for something, but i wont guess for what. I also cant help but notice, you complain about Americans a lot, while still seeming envious of us. Its ok. Americans give each other shit all the time. But n…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/17 05:48 PM
2

Ah, my apologizes. I shouldve known with your attitude of you thinking you are better than everyone and use of buzzwords that you cant even define without looking up. I dont like to tell people what they are, that seems to be your schtick. But hey, whatever helps you sleep better i guess. So cheers buddy, hope the stick in your ass doesnt impale you like Vlad did to your ancestors.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/17 05:23 PM
2

Well, since you like to make random guesses about people, my turn. Is your love for Obama so strong that you simply forget the sheer numbers of bombs and drone strikes dropped on his watch, then include him saying he "got us out of iraq" then when asked if he regretted doing that, he said "it wasnt his decision" not to mention the arming of rebels or anything, or do you choose to ignore all of those? I never said Bush was great, but blaming him for a hurricane? Really? Thats like giving Obama sh…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/17 04:47 PM
1

Exactly.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/17 04:31 PM
1

I agree. I hope that someone steps up and says "it doesnt matter what the last team did, this is what im gonna do" but i have little hope. I didnt mean my post to have a republican slant to it, i just figured having the most recent president examples would be enough. I hate how presidents blame the one before them. They are the one in charge, the buck is supposed to stop with them now. Thats how it works, this blame game thats been going on for years needs to stop.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/17 04:03 PM
3

While its fine to blame him for that, how many people blamed him for the hurricane itself? You are being obtuse because you know what i meant. I guess i could be more clear by asking how many people stayed behind refusing the free evacuation out of the city at the beginning because they thought it wouldnt be that bad. Or the people who tried to use the excuse of they couldnt afford the free evac. But hey, super easy to blame Bush instead of everyone who dropped the ball before him.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/17 03:58 PM
16

Pretty much. Obama blamed congress then. Now itll be 4 years of "thanks alt-right". But this isnt new. Before Obama they blamed Bush for Katrina and everything else. Itll always be a blame game.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/17 03:02 AM
2

No problem. Im with you on conflicted with this being posted in this sub. Its not very clear cut that wait times are only effecting one gender. True males make up most of the military, but females also have long wait times with primary care, which was under the wait time scandal. Im all for calling out the fake feminist movement when they do some bullshit, but i feel we also need to be careful in our stances as well.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:35 PM
3

Vet here. There are female only groups, counseling services, benefits, etc that males dont get. Im glad that females do have them. For example the sexual assault problem in the military. The problem is those groups are for females only. Signs ive seen for sexual assault victims are for females only. The VA is still in a shit show. I think its like you said for the most part, not just one gender issue. But i do see cases of females getting better treatment on issues both genders face. So it is a …
/r/MensRights06/03/17 08:38 PM
1

Lol. Resting murder face. I like that line.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 04:48 AM
1

Unless you are a female trying to get one because your ex boyfriend keeps walking through the restraining order that she placed against him. Especially in states where you cant buy a handgun without a firearms ID card, and that can take a while to get. But im sure its like you said, not a big deal.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 11:30 PM
20

You put a lot of thought into that statement. Care to elaborate or is it just because you said so?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/16 06:49 AM
7

Nah. Im from outside the sub. This showed up on /all. It did show your username checks out though.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/11/16 06:14 AM
1

Like i said, someone already linked a story of a male doing this exact same thing at a gym. They were arrested and brought up on charges. This gym is working with authorities so there is a chance she will be brought up on charges. So where is the sexism? You were the one that said guys, like me, would be fine with other guys taking my picture without my consent and posting it on the internet. Nah, thats sexual harassment in my book. So why does it seem ok to you if guys do that to other guys, i …
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/16 06:04 AM
2

Isnt that sexist in itself? Something you accused this very sub of in one of your comments earlier? Someone posted an article of a male doing this exact thing to another male, and they were arrested. So there is the equality. Just because im a male im supposed to be fucking fine with another dude taking pics of me naked because you say so? No.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/16 05:33 AM
2

Sadly this is the type of people that serve on juries when everyone else wants to find some way to get out of it.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 03:33 AM
3

Say you have a cop. Department implements cameras on duty for entire shift, never allowed off. Bathroom breaks, eating, their private phone conversation, all caught on camera. Say this cop pulls over someone speeding. 60 in a 50. Follows procedure to the letter, but the driver is in tears because she walking in on her husband cheating on her in their bed. She is upset, cop sees she has some shitty packed luggage in the car, uses his discretion to give her a written warning only. Cop is white, fe…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/11/15 05:21 AM
1

Yea i dont expect people to stay in a marriage if theyre not happy. Divorce is fine. But what some people do, is disgusting. And because most of the US military is male, the female is the one normally doing it. Im not calling it a female only issue, but its no secret laws protect women more than men. Military does too. That guya who had the gopro strapped to his belt, if he didnt have that and called the cops, hed be the one probably in handcuffs. On abase housing is owned by the government. No …
/r/MensRights22/09/15 05:03 PM
1

What i hated most, was nothing happens to them. If the military member cheats, the spouse can take pretty much everything. If the spouse cheats, and still takes everything, no one gives a shit. Guys coming home from Iraq or Afghanistan to an empty house, one guy came home and he dog was dead from starvation. Sometimes the spouse just trashes the house. Most of the time, spouse maxes out the member's cards, empties the joint account and maybe even his, and the member has nothing. Tough shit the m…
/r/MensRights22/09/15 02:11 PM
9

They fucking are. Working at the er, you meet a lot of them. We would joke about needing to go home at the end of a shift and plant a seed to help make up for the amount that we saw wasted. Especially over shit like that. We would have dumb fucking people come in, literally sign into the er, for a urine test to see if they are pregnant. Or they would want a blood test done because they feel its more accurate. I treated a guy one time, got his kid a fucking crossbow. I say kid, cause their age wa…
/r/MensRights22/09/15 02:51 AM
14

I worked at an er on an army base, i know too well. Woman comes in complaining of nausea, vomiting, just not feeling good. Turns out its cause shes 4 weeks pregnant and doesnt know it yet because her period is due any day. Lots of them cry to me, "what do i tell my husband? Hes in Afghanistan/Iraq/gone to training for the last month and its not his." Shit you not, ive had a few oxygen thieves ask if we could figure out who the father is from DNA. I wasnt allowed to smack them, but every weekend …
/r/MensRights22/09/15 02:21 AM
68

That was one the hardest parts of being a medic. That happened to a chunk of my platoon. Guy would get a letter, walk out the tent, everyone fucking knew. I was one of the few single guys, and the medic. There aint shit you can say to a grown man crying over a letter like that. When one of us dies, everyone mourns. When a guy has that loss on his own, all i could fucking do is hug him and let him cry. Happened way fucking more than id like to admit.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 06:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter