TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

cainmadness Archive

View 1 posts and 51 comments by cainmadness on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

cainmadness/r/MensRights03/08/12 10:15 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Lovely info, but a bit idorganized and jumbled. And the graphs were confusing to figure out initially. The phrasing above it and then the color scheme were at odds, making it hard to tell which was representing which. In short, the thing needs to be redone in a more orderly and identifable fashion.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 03:39 PM
2

I would cause such a stink over this if it happened to me. Complete bullshit even when disregarding the supposed sexism.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 12:54 PM
3

Why isn't it a good article?
/r/MensRights22/05/13 02:30 AM
3

They discriminate in a topic about discrimination. Go figure.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 03:49 AM
13

Maybe he shouldn't of been wearing that particular type of clothing. Then he wouldn't have gotten spermjacked/raped. Or whatever silly kind of rationale that SRS/feminists use.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 11:36 PM
5

Matter of subjective perspective. Many consider my assholish behavior as honest and relaxing/comedic.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 12:49 PM
0

Know to be wrong? Like to see your reasoning for that assumption.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 12:15 PM
1

The Mal's wife story arc.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 12:03 PM
1

Feminism isn't the default position for equality, being equal is. I find it similar to religious debates saying something is the default about belief, not atheism, etc. It's hogwash no matter how you try to phrase it.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 02:01 AM
13

You gave her plenty of opportunities and she wasn't willing to even try, but you must bend over backwards and do as she says? Yeah. Right. Your original post shows you getting the surgery, so that part is clear.. The other part about what to do with her? Just call her bluff, which will happen after you get the surgery. I'd remind her that you gave her many chances and she didn't take any of them to follow up. If she isn't that dedicated to getting the children even created, how dedicated would s…
/r/MensRights21/11/12 07:27 PM
0

It also goes on to detail the purpose of harassment. You can be a rules lawyer, I disagree with the scope and intent of the rule. I cited my source, all I did. A google search can lead you to the same place.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 06:34 PM
1

I posted for the Facebook group. The policy on names involves harassment. Should I not cite my sources, then?
/r/MensRights04/08/12 01:02 AM
1

I'm well aware of it. Hence the confusion.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 12:47 AM
1

That's what is confusing me so much. I posted the source of where my friend got the photo. But I'm invading her privacy?
/r/MensRights04/08/12 12:11 AM
1

Where is her personal information? Do you see it posted? Cause all I posted was the link she shared on her page, that doesn't identify her. ( The names displayed on the image I screenshotted, are publicly displayed names of the facebook group that put up the image in the first place. No different than reading an article that has names on it. ) All I have done, is mentioned that I have a friend, that is feminist and posted it. So.. What is your point?
/r/MensRights03/08/12 11:52 PM
1

It's what I wanted to point out, but again, I decided to be a chickenshit.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 10:34 PM
1

Either the man is portrayed as a despicable person, or as a servant to a queen. At least, how I interpret the message.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 10:23 PM
1

Wow, a reddit comprised of people of like-minded talking about a common topic? That's basically any subreddit on reddit. People are in Atheism, generally because they are atheists and have nowhere else to post or talk about the subject. There is of course going to be a lot of negative commentary and compliments towards it. Just as there is here, or for virtually any group talking about a common subject/theme/topic. You don't have a problem with /r/atheism being a circlejerk, you have a problem w…
/r/MensRights08/06/12 11:30 AM
4

Really? Going to go with the old 'atheism is a circlejerk' thing? Gimme a fucking break. He made some good points, but you're just being a tool.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 11:16 AM
2

Tell her that 'Not speeding will get you out of the next ticket'.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 11:14 AM
7

Good gracious, did I get into some heated arguments in high school over this. Fucking knuckleheads.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 11:07 AM
2

Not all humans have the same level intelligence.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 03:15 AM
1

I cannot stand it when someone tries to back out with the 'you can't understand this point of view!' It always makes me rip into them, pointing out I have a brain capable of imagination and examination. I find it impossible for a healthy minded individual to NOT be able to place themselves in someone else's shoes. Don't tolerate that shit from feminists or anyone.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 12:37 AM
16

So not really being fair, you're buying it for a tooootally different purpose than intended. Kudos.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 06:13 PM
1

This kind of treatment and general attitude is why i hang out at /r/actuallylesbians. They are far, far more accepting of lbgt issues than any other group. Even for bi guys, straight guys, etc.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:22 AM
1

The PC crowd was brought up. That is where the contention would be. I, personally, think that no joke is off-limits. Heck, could take the joke to even be that the husband intentionally, happily, and blissfully gave the money of his 401k to her, and in a comedic honor/mention, she made that plate. And countless amounts of people confused it for the wrong concept entirely. Who knows?
/r/MensRights27/01/12 09:20 PM
1

I did not claim every post was. Strawman. Your argument fails. And I'm done, kthxbai.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 07:13 PM
1

Great way to say "I've got nothing". Yeah, done with you if that's how you're copping out.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 06:52 PM
1

The fact the thread is called 'Bitch', might be an indicator to that. The picture is entirely unnecessary to the discussion you're claiming is going on. It is in fact, a distraction from the kind of discussion you seemingly would like to believe is going on.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 06:39 PM
0

Same question I give to you.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 06:09 PM
-1

That issue is fine and dandy, but is not what is gong on in this thread. The thread, thus far, has been nothing but emotional hostility to the picture itself, without justification by evidence. If the topic wanted to be expanded upon rationally and reasonably, so far it would be best done outside the shadow of the picture (i.e. A new thread.) And insinuating I'm a pot head speaks volumes about your ability to critically think.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 05:48 PM
-6

Like how you guys keep going on about the picture without any evidence? You are blowing hot air just the same. This entire thread is useless. It's sensationalist and only evokes emotions that would be better focused to knowable issues of our cause.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 02:23 PM
-5

Yeah, it kind of does if you don't want to appear intellectually dishonest. We don't even know if the plate's owner is a fucking woman in the first place. We know nothing. Just a picture. On the net. Nothing else to go with. And yet all this bullshit towards it, without a leg of evidence to stand on? Psh. Please. You all want to be idiots lashing out with blind rage and emotion, be my guest. But I prefer to take it at face value and treat it as a joke, laugh, and move on. we have more important …
/r/MensRights27/01/12 02:00 PM
-16

Who the fuck is talking about PC. Again, you are strawman'ing. You have no idea off it is serious or a joke. It's a picture of a plate, nothing more. If you saw a picture of someone in a Nazi uniform, does it mean a real Nazi? Or could it be Halloween, or an actor? Without context, you don't have a clue. Stop assuming you know any more than the rest of us.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 09:55 AM
0

Don't try to act like you didn't insinuate that she is doing him wrong. You hooked right on and ran with it. The only evidence you have is a plate, and you tried to infer something you have no reason to believe. Step off.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 06:58 AM
-22

Do you have any proof that she did this, and it isn't merely a joke? You are not being rational, merely emotional. Pull the wool from your eyes.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 06:16 AM
-2

The point is, that you don't know if she bought it out of malicious intent. She goody be happily married to the guy. You are acting on emotion, not reason.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 06:14 AM
1

Sources? Because otherwise, you sound rather hallow.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 02:22 AM
2

Weed has ever killed? News to me.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 11:52 AM
13

The problem I have with your little message, is that it affixes gender roles. Maybe if you didn't treat them like barefoot, pregnant 'bitches' to stay in the kitchen, then just maybe.. JUUUUST maybe, they might be willing to do things for you without bitching. You know, the whole treat them equal thing? That doesn't include treat them like a house possession.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 12:56 AM
2

No.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 09:54 AM
1

....wut?
/r/MensRights11/10/11 12:55 PM
0

That is what is making this funny. Never heard any complaints of Hades being her father, but Zeus? Oh no, we demand to have the lord of Hell as her father! New Feminists are so fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights11/10/11 09:44 AM
9

And I am just certain that while they claim no gender bias with their PSA, they have never once made one with a female abuser.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 06:43 AM
6

With the exception that likely everyone you're claiming to be 'anti-women' also happens to be in support of equality unlike feminism which is all about female empowerment and entitlement. So while there are lots of anti-women jokes, comments, and other antics, I fail to see how it even remotely resembles something not for men's rights. You're sounding like one of those tards that complains about /r/Atheism or any other group on reddit being a circlejerk. Hey, guess what. People coming to groups …
/r/MensRights17/09/11 09:20 PM
4

Really? Going to indulge in some fanboy fanaticism? They don't use what you would prefer, so bad bad bad?
/r/MensRights13/09/11 11:10 PM
1

Which would be a big fit to my scheme of stopping pay to her, as she is supported by other means. Good gracious, some of you are so quick with your jaded behaviors.
/r/MensRights02/09/11 07:03 PM
1

Which would likely fit under the terms I suggest for cancelling support payments to her.
/r/MensRights02/09/11 07:00 PM
7

Personally, I wouldn't mind paying money to a gal in a case.. If she was compelled to job search in order to get that money. Once she gets a job, no more money from me to her. Encouraging the woman to be a deadbeat doesn't do any justice for the family environment, for her, or for society.
/r/MensRights02/09/11 09:49 AM
3

Wow, profound.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 02:30 AM
-1

I half-expected a Jew-born-after-WWII joke.
/r/MensRights07/08/11 10:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter