TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

caius_iulius_caesar Archive

View 10 posts and 1,754 comments by caius_iulius_caesar on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
62

Feminismcaius_iulius_caesar/r/MensRights03/12/15 08:09 PM
46

Discriminationcaius_iulius_caesar/r/MensRights05/12/15 08:10 PM
43

Newscaius_iulius_caesar/r/MensRights22/02/15 02:20 AM
34

Feminismcaius_iulius_caesar/r/MensRights20/07/15 05:08 AM
31

caius_iulius_caesar/r/MensRights04/07/14 06:41 AM
7

caius_iulius_caesar/r/MGTOW27/06/15 05:09 PM
7

caius_iulius_caesar/r/MGTOW19/10/13 04:39 AM
3

caius_iulius_caesar/r/altTRP13/05/15 07:06 AM
1

Marriage/Divorcecaius_iulius_caesar/r/MensRights05/06/15 08:44 PM
0

caius_iulius_caesar/r/MGTOW05/06/15 08:50 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,754 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
48

And they say it's not prostitution.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 05:34 PM
1

It's a good movie.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 04:29 PM
2

You don't deserve pets.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 04:22 PM
8

One thing I cannot tolerate is deliberate cruelty to those who can't defend themselves, even those I don't like. Including cats.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 04:21 PM
1

The woman discussed in that video is downright scary.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 05:31 AM
1

Why are they all Canadian?
/r/MensRights24/01/16 05:30 AM
0

If you believe in the freedom to have guns, you should also believe in the freedom not to have body-parts amputated without consent.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 03:13 PM
0

It may well be, at least in some jurisdictions: http://www.utas.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/283701/CircumcisionIssuesPaperA4toPrint.pdf (See p. 20ff). In most jurisdictions, the issue has never been litigated. I wonder why?
/r/MensRights23/01/16 03:10 PM
1

Pity she didn't swallow the whole cellphone.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 03:02 PM
2

Feminist girlfriend? Not even twice. She's your ex. Don't waste time sending her messages.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 02:59 PM
2

Irrelevant concern-trolling.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 09:06 AM
1

But they're "special".
/r/MensRights17/01/16 09:04 AM
2

The issue you're describing is inserted l pounds and inches, not chromosome-combinations.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 09:03 AM
1

So one guy saw a man hit a woman, and dozens only saw the opposite.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 09:02 AM
2

If she'd done it to him, would have made that same threat to her? Maybe that wouldn't have made you look like such a tough guy.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 09:00 AM
2

I regularly see women do that to men. The opposite is very rarely seen.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 08:59 AM
1

And then what?
/r/MGTOW15/01/16 11:13 PM
1

"Company", not "accompaniment".
/r/MGTOW15/01/16 11:08 PM
1

What sort of friend is that? And it's "penchant", not penance.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 11:04 PM
1

We have no idea of the causes of greater male property-destruction (which, of course, affect all of society). We have no idea of the causes of greater female healthcare consumption. We likewise have no idea of the causes of greater female emotional destruction. I could go on. I would like ask these problems fixed, and more. However, I am more concerned with the formal (i.e., legal) inequality that exists between men and women, as well as other groups (such as, notably, adults and children), so I…
/r/MensRights15/01/16 10:50 PM
1

Why don't you tell USA which cultures you were talking about?
/r/MensRights15/01/16 10:33 PM
3

Unverifiable and probably apocryphal stories like this help nobody.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 04:46 PM
1

Would you please point me to some links demonstrating that Islam "condones rape"? My understanding is that it's very harshly punished.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 04:34 PM
1

I've met some younger guys from wealthy backgrounds in the last couple of years who've never experienced it. They've never been in a fight, never been beaten by parents etc. The first time I encountered it, I was amazed.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 04:30 PM
0

No. Kidnapping requires moving the victim from one place to another.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:34 AM
2

That would be corrupt.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:33 AM
1

You know why.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:32 AM
1

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1361028/
/r/MensRights11/01/16 01:40 AM
0

Given that it's a Communist, feminist, baby-murdering organisation, I'm not surprised.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 05:34 AM
3

In other words, when they're no longer men's problems?
/r/MensRights09/01/16 05:16 AM
1

A more appropriate hashtag would be #BeCruelToHim2016
/r/MensRights09/01/16 04:55 AM
2

Facts are literally intellectual rape. /s
/r/MensRights09/01/16 04:44 AM
2

The FBI provides data on the ethnicity of criminal perpetrators for various offences. It does not make an outright racial comparison between crimes.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 04:15 AM
1

The FBI data to 2008+.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 03:38 PM
1

If he thought she was OK with it, it's not indecent assault.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:47 AM
3

Let me just put it this way. Blacks are overrepresented among rapists to a greater degree than they are overrepresented among murderers.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:45 AM
1

That would indeed be the response ... to everything that reflects poorly on (some) women.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:25 AM
2

Taxes overwhelmingly go to services women use, like healthcare. I want to know: why are women's groups, seemingly predominantly interested in telling men what not do, not doing more to kerb female bad behaviour (like filing false rape reports)?
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:24 AM
3

Forgive me if I disregard the views of a diagnosed sociopath on matters of empathy and morality.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:20 AM
2

And you don't think that rape happens primarily among the poor? I've got a bridge to sell you.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:17 AM
2

Neither will a college class.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:15 AM
10

In almost a decade on reddit, I've never seen a thread brigaded this much. SRS is in full attack mode.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:12 AM
1

Why do you say "probably"? I've never met anyone (including the retarded) who didn't know what rape and indecent assault were.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:08 AM
6

How is throwing babies in dumpsters the responsibility of those who don't throw babies in dumpsters?
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:06 AM
3

I find your faith in "anti-racism" ads disturbing.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:04 AM
9

No, they don't. The ones who've committed crimes need to be tried for those crimes in a fair and impartial hearing. (Good luck with that in Germany.) The ones who haven't need to be left the fuck alone.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:03 AM
1

Nice analysis. <sup>/s</sup>
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:00 AM
1

I eat less.
/r/askTRP07/01/16 07:09 AM
1

So why do the media do this?
/r/MensRights06/01/16 01:01 AM
0

She just likes the attention that comes from complaining about it.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 12:59 AM
1

The Spectator has always had its head screwed on straight when it comes to these things.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 12:45 AM
1

Merely not having the evidence to convict isn't evidence of a false accusation. I don't think "unfounded" just means acquitted. What do you suppose the graphic is suggesting is the difference between a false and a baseless accusation? It's not for me to say what the graphic means. If pressed, then based on the dictionary meaning, I'd suppose that baseless accusations were recanted or otherwise conclusively proven untrue.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 11:24 AM
0

To hurt someone it is most effective to understand their feelings. That is the definition of empathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 11:27 PM
2

How could a true accusation be "unfounded"?
/r/MensRights01/01/16 11:12 PM
1

There were no "bad" blacks (or women, unless you count the female stormtrooper). Only good ones.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 02:07 PM
1

There has been an unholy alliance between socialism and feminism for a long time, and yet commentors on this sub so often proudly proclaim their socialist politics.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 02:04 PM
1

Punjab is only 1.93% Muslim.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 02:03 PM
1

What if it's true?
/r/MensRights01/01/16 02:01 PM
3

But gay men having the lowest rates of rape and DV? THAT is very surprising. This really does imperil the idea that male gender norms condition men into being rapists/abusers. Not if you posit that they're less likely to conform to male gender norms.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 11:38 AM
1

Well, Lesbians are only 2.5% of the population (a third as common as gay guys), so even assuming reciprocal violence (=5%) I don't think it'll inflate the figures too much.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 11:34 AM
0

16-21 is adulthood in the UK. It depends what the purpose is. There is no one age.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 11:26 AM
1

Circumstances of indecency are enough to render it indecent assault.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 11:16 AM
2

I think "unfounded" and "baseless" mean exactly the same thing as "false", and certainly in this context.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 11:14 AM
0

I don't know the Irish law or public opinion concerning fathers' rights.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 08:21 AM
0

Maybe it's just skipping a fairly negative (on the whole) era of history.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 08:15 AM
1

It's technically correct. It might be incomplete, or arguably misleading, but it's correct.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 04:09 AM
0

Ireland is actually pretty good on this stuff. It isn't a feminist stronghold like most of the West.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 05:57 PM
2

Do you really think it will be applied against women?
/r/MensRights30/12/15 05:55 PM
1

Fairer in this context just means prettier. Not that I agree with that.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 05:55 PM
5

They don't seem to get that. It makes you wonder.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 05:52 PM
5

It's only feminism if it's in women's favor.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 05:50 PM
21

Except for the ones they already closed down ...
/r/MensRights30/12/15 05:46 PM
0

I read it. It's half a hour I'll never get back.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 05:33 PM
0

I thought it was long, aimless, self-important and ultimately barely relevant.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 09:31 AM
1

There are numerous feminist forums online. Are you saying that only the crazies go there?
/r/MensRights30/12/15 01:34 AM
3

An example please?
/r/MensRights30/12/15 01:11 AM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_pedophile_and_pederast_advocacy_organizations
/r/MensRights30/12/15 01:10 AM
3

Why would a movement of whom the majority are (ostensibly) moderate reject moderates? It doesn't make sense. What does make sense is the proposition that the majority aren't in fact moderates.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 03:46 PM
1

That's not recent. It's been pushed in Europe for decades.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 03:39 PM
1

You possessive, woman-hating MRAs! /s
/r/MensRights29/12/15 03:36 PM
1

It's a bit like calling yourself a "moderate Fascist".
/r/MensRights29/12/15 03:22 PM
1

Those groups are Christian in that they follow Christ. They're named after him. Your group isn't named after a person. You can choose whatever name you want. BTW, groups like Westboro often call themselves "Bible-believing Christians" to distinguish themselves from types like the Uniting Church. EDIT: Just out of interest, is your username a reference to Evil Angels/A Cry in the Dark specifically, or to the Chamberlain case generally? What prompted you to choose it?
/r/MensRights29/12/15 03:21 PM
2

If indeed they're the majority, just how is that possible?
/r/MensRights29/12/15 03:17 PM
1

All that is necessary for evil to flourish is that good men people feminists do nothing.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 03:17 PM
1

OK, so you don't have any sources, apparently. Your advice is a bit like telling someone who has the impression that Nazis are mostly bad to participate in some Nazi activism to find out.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 03:13 PM
3

Egalitarianism is the way forward, but it's an awfully difficult name to adopt if you aren't, uh, actually egalitarian. That, I think, is the principal stumbling-block.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 03:08 PM
1

I've met them in person my whole life. If anything, it's worse in person. They just get angry and shriek at you.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 02:53 PM
3

Can you show me a source of this moderate, non-discriminatory feminism?
/r/MensRights29/12/15 02:47 PM
2

In this case, the double-standard seems to be upside-down.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 05:16 AM
1

On what planet could there be?
/r/askTRP27/12/15 05:01 PM
0

I'm from SRS? I doubt they'll be pleased to hear that.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 11:42 PM
3

And everyone else more miserable.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 03:10 PM
3

No, I'm saying that quotas are wrong. If you can't get by without quotas, tough. Equality of opportunity, not equality of outcomes.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/15 04:59 AM
-4

Occam's Razor is a logical fallacy. But I agree that what you suggest is more likely.
/r/askTRP20/12/15 04:36 AM
2

Not at all. If you impose quotas, you're favoring a group. If one group is more successful without quotas, that just means it doesn't suck so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/15 04:29 AM
2

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/15 04:27 AM
2

Indistinguishable to you, apparently.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/15 04:27 AM
2

He didn't dwell on redpill websites at all. He rejected the whole idea, just like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/15 04:22 AM
3

I like to assume good faith, but you're testing my resolve.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/15 04:19 AM
6

Better than no links at all, sunshine.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/15 03:47 AM
2

Favoring one group is disfavoring the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/15 03:44 AM
2

It takes two to tango, but only one to fuck it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/15 03:38 AM
1

Arguably, men have more effective ones available.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/15 03:34 AM
2

Substitute "Nazis" with "1930s Germans" and the analogy holds.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 05:14 PM
2

The Nazis did say that.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 05:10 PM
1

If you think everyone is selfish, that's just sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/15 12:57 AM
1

Not everyone is so selfish as you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/15 04:54 AM
2

I think you might be onto something with the "standard cultural idea of beauty".
/r/MensRights13/12/15 03:50 AM
1

You're right. A number of jurisdictions actually make it a different (more serious) crime, with a harsher penalty.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 01:03 PM
1

Zero percent takes a lot of explaining. I never called it an epidemic. That was someone else.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 12:51 PM
1

You think Brad Pitt isn't on steroids?
/r/MensRights12/12/15 04:42 AM
1

Not one black woman was raped by a white man, despite whites being the majority. (Utterly extraordinary in itself.) Black men raped white women at a rate disproportional to their numbers.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 04:15 AM
2

http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus0702.pdf (table 42). In the sample, 25% of rapes of black white women in the sample were by black men, and 100% of rapes of black women in the sample were by black men. *mistake
/r/MensRights11/12/15 07:56 PM
1

One would expect that to apply more to property than sex crimes. Anyway, blacks have always been poor. Citation: http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus0702.pdf (table 42).
/r/MensRights11/12/15 07:53 PM
1

Ashkenazi Jews (the majority, I think) are likely mostly Kazakhs, not Middle Eastern.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 06:39 PM
4

James Deen committed a cardinal sin. He was a male, heterosexual porn star who successfully broke into the mainstream ahead of female porn stars.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 06:36 PM
1

Just out of interest, how do you account for the current prevalence of black male on white female rapes, if the "epidemic" of them in the distant past was a fiction?
/r/MensRights10/12/15 06:29 PM
1

"Right-wing" and "anarchist" are almost terms of abuse in most people's minds.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 12:34 AM
2

And what are the proportions, in your view? I'd say it's 95% rocks to 5% rock-stars.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 12:32 AM
7

Beware of those absolutes - always, only, never. They always get you into trouble ;)
/r/MensRights08/12/15 12:29 AM
0

Look, I agree with most of what you're saying, but the Bruce Lee point is fatuous. Rutger Hauer, Arnie, Stallone, Harrison Ford, etc., etc. - all these are considered more masculine than Bruce Lee or Jet Li. Part of Bruce Lee's selling-point in his day was the irony that while he looked like the waiter in your Chinese takeaway, or the accountant at work, he could still kick ass.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 12:25 AM
0

About the area where Asian men are not doing better is sport and getting laid. But then white men aren't doing as well as black men in those areas either.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 12:18 AM
1

In all fairness, she's actually pretty reasonable.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 12:09 AM
1

You should have asked /u/Aceeri, not /u/MisanthropeNotAutist.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 08:58 PM
1

There was sexual interference, not rape as such. I don't know whether it was ante- or post-mortem. *typo
/r/MensRights05/12/15 08:57 PM
-3

Are you for real? I suspect not.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 08:44 PM
1

Priceless.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 08:38 PM
1

I saw your comments, and I asked for clarification (which I didn't really get), but I didn't downvote you. The fact that reddit now hides the total up- and downvote scores is a real problem. It's making you feel that everyone disagrees with you, when they don't. Don't leave.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 08:30 PM
2

They don't exist, and I don't believe they ever did. Not in the last 25 years, anyway.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 08:27 PM
1

ELI5 is one of the most censored subreddits. I assume that's because the mods regard its readers as impressionable. (They want things explained like they're 5, after all.)
/r/MensRights05/12/15 08:22 PM
1

Perhaps the woman did hit the man, because he was sleeping with her sister. This does not make her a domestic abuser, nor does it make him one either. What? If you assault your partner, that's domestic abuse. How could his sleeping with his girlfriend's sister and being assaulted by his girlfriend make him a domestic abuser? (He might be a POS, but that's not a crime.)
/r/MensRights05/12/15 08:18 PM
1

For Christians in the other hand (you being a Jew and knowing FUCK ALL about it) [...] If my not being Christian means I know "FUCK ALL" about Christianity, then your not being Muslim means you know FUCK ALL about Islam. And those who read it in the original Arabic go ALLAHOO ACKBAR BANG and detonate themselves. Go figure. Do you read Arabic? I thought not. For Christians in the other hand [...] there's a complete prohibition on violence. Jesus said, "From this day on, let him who has no sword b…
/r/MensRights04/12/15 11:22 PM
1

LOL. The Old Testament isn't relevant to Christians? Will you tell them, or shall I? *BTW, have you ever heard of Meir Kahane, Baruch Goldstein or the Cave of the Patriarchs massacre? (I think you'd approve.)
/r/MensRights04/12/15 11:14 PM
1

You're right. She did her job well.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 11:13 PM
1

I think that the 3 most feminist countries in the world are Sweden, Canada and Australia.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 11:07 PM
1

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=e2f13f2awK4
/r/MensRights04/12/15 01:17 PM
3

It was announced on Australian national radio today that it's to be taught in schools.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 03:18 AM
1

Neither position is defensible.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 11:50 PM
0

The Bible, aside from some snake-juggling fuckwits in the American South, is understood to be a collection of writings ABOUT God, that are good for instruction, but it makes no claim at all to be written BY God, or be inerrant. Have you ever heard of Torah from Sinai? That's exactly what Orthodox Jews believe as well. Perhaps you want to kill them all too? Someone else had that idea.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 11:22 PM
1

You're crazy, and (worse still) ignorant. To be a Muslim, all you need to do is say 3 times, "There is no God but God, and Muhammed is His prophet." There are dozens (hundreds?) of Qur'an translations, and they all differ. There's more incitement to killing in the Bible than in the Qur'an. (And before you accuse me of being in an Islamist "sleeper cell", I'm Jewish.) *spelling
/r/MensRights03/12/15 11:17 PM
1

Notice that in the US, where there are few Muslims, we don't have that many problems. In the UK, where there are more, there's violence in the streets The USA has a much higher homicide rate than the UK, France or Germany.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 11:11 PM
1

Deuteronomy 20:10-18 (NIV): When you march up to attack a city, make its people an offer of peace. If they accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall be subject to forced labor and shall work for you. If they refuse to make peace and they engage you in battle, lay siege to that city. When the Lord your God delivers it into your hand, put to the sword all the men in it. As for the women, the children, the livestock and everything else in the city, you may take these as plunder for yo…
/r/MensRights03/12/15 11:08 PM
-7

She didn't reply that way because she's politically astute and dishonest. I think rape victims should be believed. I just don't know who is lying and who isn't. Do you genuinely think rape victims shouldn't be believed?
/r/MensRights03/12/15 11:02 PM
0

He's snatching the pussypass. That's what he's doing.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 10:54 PM
1

Have you ever met a sex-crime detective? They don't pressure complainants.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 10:52 PM
73

And from a lawyer who once defended rape cases.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 10:50 PM
-9

Not fair. Much as I despise her, Hillary said rape victims (not accusers) should be believed. She'd say (if forced to answer the question directly - not her favourite thing) that her husband's accusers were lying. That's her out.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 10:48 PM
4

Will you please link something that supports your assertion?
/r/MensRights03/12/15 10:45 PM
2

What, actually during the march?
/r/MensRights03/12/15 10:21 PM
1

Thanks, GWW. Yet again you've exposed me to insights I would not have found on my own. *spelling
/r/MensRights03/12/15 10:17 PM
1

I assumed it was the Muslims, and then I saw it was an Audi.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 10:15 PM
3

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3vblf7/feminism_now_a_subject_in_australian_high_school/cxm56cl
/r/MensRights03/12/15 10:09 PM
6

Do the schoolboys deserve it?
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:39 PM
3

At Fitzroy High School? (Perhaps a bit like Islington or one of the more Left-wing suburbs in San Francisco, as a point of comparison.) In a class taught by the "Fitzroy Feminist Collective"? Good luck with that. The poor boys will just do higher math or something instead.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:38 PM
2

Let Stalk Strine?
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:35 PM
2

What is your source for the proposition that it's mandatory?
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:34 PM
4

I don't believe it's mandatory. Yet ...
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:33 PM
1

How old do you think she is? Feminism hasn't been about equality since the 1950s, if it ever was.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:32 PM
2

All feminists need to do is admit that they fucked up big time Most people don't admit fault readily, still less women, still less feminists.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:31 PM
2

Ten years ago? Where have you been living? Thirty years ago it was about the oft-abused (mostly abused) retraining order laws, quotas in business and government, "affirmative" action in college admissions, and telling little schoolboys (like me) that men were responsible for all the violence in the world - and that if only women ran the world, there would be no wars. Twenty years ago, when I entered college, it was about outright female supremacy. (I well remember calling to enquire about what I…
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:26 PM
0

It's like the police. 99% give the other 1% a bad name.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:19 PM
1

Look what happened when OJ got into civil court. It won't be so hospitable there. He could wind up getting a finding that he did assault her. It's not worth it.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:17 PM
0

He could afford good lawyers.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:13 PM
1

The maximum penalty is about 1 year. A fine is the norm ... if they're charged.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:13 PM
1

They're Muslim. What's the evidence that their killing spree has anything to do with extremist Islamism?
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:11 PM
1

She won't be released. That would be too greedy. But she'll only get a few years. I assume he'll be shot, if he hasn't already been.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:10 PM
2

Will we hear anything about "toxic femininity"?
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:09 PM
1

Then it will be "just a joke". Don't you have a sense of humour?
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:08 PM
1

It means whatever they want it to mean, whenever they want it to mean it.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:07 PM
2

Remember that screeching crone holding the "this is what a feminist looks like" sign?
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:04 PM
2

No charity that pays backpackers on commission to get my money, gets my money.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:01 PM
1

Heather Osland in Australia became a feminist cause célèbre after drugging her husband and shooting him dead wile he slept.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 08:56 PM
1

And yet we only ever heard about Aung San Suu Kyi.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 08:53 PM
3

Are you sure? Title IX doesn't stop female-only scholarships. In any case, Title IX is just legislation, and if Sweden adopts this policy it will be by legislation. In the US, your only protection against such a policy would be the Fourteenth Amendment.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 08:50 PM
2

Well said. It's beyond belief. And it does put me off fucking them.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 08:45 PM
1

Unfortunately, I think it's too optimistic.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 08:21 PM
1

This guy is very much in favor of circumcision and apparently does it (unqualified) for fun in the Philippines. I just thought I'd mention that.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 08:16 PM
4

Good.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 09:18 AM
1

You think all women lie about how many partners they've had?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/15 12:06 AM
7

If you're not going to debate, and you therefore don't cite evidence, don't be surprised when your views aren't accepted.
/r/askTRP28/11/15 12:01 AM
1

I'm glad I inspired a layman to do legal research! I suspect (without having checked) that the interpretation of legislation statute enables "he" also to be read as "she".
/r/MensRights25/11/15 07:09 AM
1

At least we all hate Everybody Loves Raymond.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 06:43 AM
2

Literally? Really?
/r/MGTOW25/11/15 03:04 AM
1

I don't think so. People are sick of the Democrats, and she has enough baggage to ground an Antanov.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 10:56 PM
2

Thanks for being a voice of reason. I dislike her and all she stands for, but strawmanning won't help anybody.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 10:54 PM
1

Silly indeed.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 10:46 PM
1

That's Milo? I just turned fully gay.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 10:40 PM
1

Not in England.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 10:39 PM
1

Unwanted French kissing is not rape.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 10:38 PM
1

The Irish actually seem pretty good on this stuff.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 10:30 PM
1

Vote for someone else. At least in the Senate. Not surprised you're an Aussie, BTW.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 10:29 PM
1

She's a bit like the Wizard of Oz.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 10:25 PM
2

Are you sure they weren't joshing? It's buttfuck nowhere.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 10:21 PM
1

Well, she's a kindergarten teacher.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 10:20 PM
1

Watch the other episodes. Equally good.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 10:17 PM
2

You know what? I'm not a Muslim, I'm a Jew, and I certainly don't share your values. That much is obvious.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 10:09 PM
2

Alberta doesn't sound a likely target for a terrorist attack. I think you're paranoid.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 10:04 PM
1

Irony think a week's groceries is doable in 30 minutes at all. And ironing can take hours.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 10:01 PM
5

Canada is a Leftist police state.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 09:53 PM
2

It's sad. It used to be great.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 09:49 PM
1

I think your estimates are low.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 09:48 PM
115

She gets primary custody; he pays child support. That'll teach him not to disagree with her.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 09:22 PM
3

To Kill a Mockingbird, anyone?
/r/MensRights20/11/15 04:53 PM
2

It's about 1 in 1000 M->F.
/r/MGTOW18/11/15 03:14 PM
1

I'm envious already!
/r/askTRP18/11/15 01:18 PM
2

KGB decides what interests KGB.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 01:14 PM
2

I'd do it for a 6-figure job or a big lottery win, actually.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 01:12 PM
3

Work where you want. Draw appropriate inferences. She does not want you two comparing notes.
/r/askTRP18/11/15 12:29 PM
5

He'd have to fuck 1000+ girls while infected to give even 1 HIV (assuming vaginal sex).
/r/MGTOW18/11/15 04:20 AM
1

Queer and Questioning, Undecided, Intersex, Lesbian, Transgender, Bisexual, Asexual & Gay. At least it's memorable.
/r/altTRP17/11/15 08:11 PM
0

When girls do it it's celebrating their sexuality.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 09:23 PM
3

The first one is spot on. At least it looks like a few people read it.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 09:16 PM
6

Some of these are unbelievable. Like this one, with 177 net up votes: It could also be that women care more about how they look when they're found It's not because women don't want to die, but because they care how they look. because they don't want to traumatize or hurt other people. Not only that, this concern for their appearance is altruistic! For example, it's less disturbing to find a body that overdosed on sleeping pills than a body that's been hit by a train, thereby traumatizing the con…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 09:14 PM
3

That's actually very funny.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 08:47 PM
2

You'd need to take at least a few packets.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 08:45 PM
2

All the unmarried guys I know have close friends, usually closer friends than the women I know. The married guys usually don't.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 08:09 PM
2

I can't imagine saying yes.
/r/altTRP16/11/15 05:21 AM
2

The most extreme I've seen is "QUILTBAG".
/r/altTRP16/11/15 05:20 AM
4

"Inner shame" is guilt, not shame. They're different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/15 02:17 PM
3

If you don't like them, that's your prerogative. Don't waste your time with them. You could consider going gay if that's possible for you. (Serious.)
/r/askTRP15/11/15 08:38 AM
1

Thanks, but I won't be doing that. I'll be praying that people don't get sucked into even more collectivist alarmism.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 10:24 PM
1

He shouldn't confront her. He should gather evidence and report her. Then her employers will confront her.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 08:50 PM
1

Sorry, I thought you thought the Catholic church was actually founded then. *typo
/r/MensRights14/11/15 08:45 PM
4

Violating "district policy" can't make a recording "illegal". Even a teacher should know that. I'm not sure why I'm wasting my fingers with this.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 08:38 PM
1

1470s??
/r/MensRights14/11/15 08:36 PM
1

That's why many go into teaching.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 08:36 PM
1

That second quote could have come straight from my autobiography.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 08:34 PM
2

If you're not legally qualified, be careful of giving legal advice.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 08:33 PM
1

They can't be bald?
/r/MensRights14/11/15 08:29 PM
1

Read The Bell Curve.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 08:27 PM
6

Lawyer here. The legality of the recording depends where it's made. Stick to what you know.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 08:27 PM
0

This, OP. It's the best way. She'll probably just resign when confronted with evidence.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 08:25 PM
4

That's just gay, man. /s
/r/MensRights14/11/15 01:10 PM
1

He had no sex with them? It all seems bizarre.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 08:02 PM
2

Maybe the guy was just bisexual. He's a cheater, sure, but why brand him a "closet-case"?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 03:51 PM
1

Another fan of Games People Play?
/r/askTRP13/11/15 12:27 PM
9

He's having a rough time. Just let him be.
/r/MGTOW13/11/15 12:01 AM
12

Why be cruel to him at a time like this?
/r/MGTOW12/11/15 03:29 AM
6

Perceptive.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 08:27 AM
1

It would be for me. But to each his own.
/r/askTRP06/11/15 02:36 PM
2

There would be a massive comparative oversupply of appealing women, and the result would be a sexual marketplace favoring young men. Accordingly, the legal and social rules we have that favor women over men would begin to dissolve.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 01:54 PM
5

She's lying, but you know that, don't you? Plate or next. Your choice.
/r/askTRP06/11/15 01:35 PM
1

In the case of the waiters, mostly from other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 11:15 PM
1

I'm sure gay women wouldn't disagree. But then, there are so few of them.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 09:05 AM
1

It doesn't sound aggressive at all.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 08:25 AM
1

This issue is complicated, I think, by what I believe to be a controversial fact: that women are basically not so sexually driven as men. (I say this as a bisexual who has sexual relations with both sexes.) Few women, in my view, value a prospective partner primarily for sexual appeal. I think you're basically right: the majority of 25-year-old women with 40-year-old men are not with them primarily for their sexual appeal. But neither are the majority of 25-year-old women with 25-year-old men fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 03:59 AM
5

Assume good faith and practise civility.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 06:52 AM
2

Because abortions are legal and I have no right to the child. If I demanded my kid, then I'm an evil controlling patriarchal monster. If I didn't want the kid I'm an immature coward who doesn't love her. So true.
/r/MGTOW23/10/15 06:32 AM
3

This could be a legitimate question, or a sniping attempt.
/r/MGTOW23/10/15 06:31 AM
1

It's not my metaphor to meddle with. I was merely correcting you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/15 11:17 AM
2

Some (older) guns can fire without misconduct by the user.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/15 11:27 PM
1

Misfiring is failure of the gun to fire when you want it to.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/15 11:26 PM
2

It's not just you.
/r/askTRP10/10/15 03:46 PM
2

I'm Jewish and appreciate the halachic position. Catholicism does not support circumcision. Both Islam as a religion and Islamic law prefer circumcision but do not demand it of converts, for example.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 11:31 PM
2

The establishment and maintenance of sporting and social clubs for disadvantaged youth at risk of involvement in crime was normal policy in those days.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 08:58 AM
2

A negative can be an awfully hard thing to prove.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 08:56 AM
1

What makes you say that is a basic legal right in the UK?
/r/MensRights06/10/15 05:33 AM
2

I don't think circumcision is mandated by Islamic law, just preferred.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 05:26 AM
2

Why does this bonding have to happen while naked in the shower?
/r/MensRights06/10/15 05:20 AM
1

We have a winner.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 05:12 AM
1

What a very 1950s proposal. I like it.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 05:08 AM
1

Why was Klebold so easily influenced?
/r/MensRights06/10/15 05:01 AM
2

Why shouldn't the woman prove when he was notified?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 04:38 AM
1

You're imagining things. You want to watch that. I haven't been hostile. I haven't told you what you can and cannot do. I encourage you to show where I did either of those things. Homosexually doesn't make me uncomfortable. I'm bisexual myself. I don't oppose gay rights. The issue simply has nothing to do with the discussion. How do you like them apples?
/r/MensRights05/10/15 07:15 AM
1

What makes you think I'm annoyed? I just think it's irrelevant.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 08:32 AM
1

If you're conscious of your biases, I'd suggest an effort to minimise them.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 09:02 PM
1

Nicely put.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 04:52 AM
1

Calling someone naive and disagreeing with him isn't rage.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 04:44 AM
1

I don't think an opinion article is much of a source.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 04:40 AM
0

'Round That's something I haven't seen in a long time.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 04:34 AM
1

Gynocentrism (as usually defined) exists. The patriarchy (as usually defined) doesn't. And what's being gay got to do with it?
/r/MensRights03/10/15 04:31 AM
2

It's called /r/asktrp, and it's not that active.
/r/askTRP27/09/15 06:36 PM
5

My wife and her friends did this, and it turned out years later that at least half of them (her included) had been porking the dead guy at one time or another.
/r/askTRP27/09/15 06:29 PM
1

The best way for a woman to get what she wants is to get a man to get her what she wants.
/r/MGTOW11/09/15 08:45 AM
1

This Is England.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 06:00 PM
3

Risible troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/15 06:37 AM
1

It's not surprising, but it's interesting that they feel they need a fake gender-egalitarian sub reddit.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 05:24 PM
2

Drug and seatbelt laws are the same.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 04:58 PM
0

Why? Men want sex more than women. It skews the market. End of story.
/r/askTRP02/09/15 02:36 PM
0

I was there, I remember. I hoped it had died a natural death. It's the most embarrassing search-term on the map.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 09:45 AM
0

Hackey-sack?
/r/MensRights31/08/15 08:19 PM
2

I'm not allowed to vote, but I'd vote for Rand Paul. The scourge of feminism which we so abhor is but one arm of the illiberal and totalitarian policy of cultural Marxism and political economics to which we have been increasingly subjected over the last half-century.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 06:55 PM
1

I'd like to see them try enforcing that in Tennessee. Ha.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 10:33 AM
2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFFQOtHWbNw
/r/MensRights31/08/15 10:25 AM
4

You feel pressured by innocuous words?
/r/MensRights31/08/15 10:22 AM
11

If you outlaw everything you can selectively persecute whoever displeases you.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 08:29 AM
4

What are you meant to do, tell her she has to take the pill in front of you?
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:19 PM
2

In Ancient Greece, men had sex with each other for fun. I'm not surprised the women felt neglected.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 05:57 AM
8

Why come to a sub called PurplePillDebate (notice the "debate" part?) then? Just to laugh?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 05:32 AM
3

I've no idea why you come here then.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 05:28 AM
5

There is a difference in their respective agendas for being here. BPs are mostly here to shame RPs, not to persuade them, inform them, or engage in an impartial search for truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 05:17 AM
1

But we're not arguing about anything, are we? [unwarranted hostility] Why seek to have a confrontation for no reason?
/r/MensRights25/08/15 05:05 PM
1

Now I understand why we won't agree. You're one of the people I'm talking about.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 04:41 PM
1

Not a good idea in this case.
/r/askTRP25/08/15 03:02 PM
1

So basically my question is. wtf is wrong with this girl. My question mark button on my keyboard is broken. Possibly the strangest post I've ever seen on this sub. Don't talk to her again, and hope she doesn't call the cops.
/r/askTRP25/08/15 03:01 PM
1

I hope you're right. I've met hundreds of anarchists IRL as well as online. Almost all who so described themselves were "socialist anarchists" who would rather have the status quo than live in an anarcho-capitalist society.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 02:41 PM
1

eg the mods at /r/anarchism. Mods are just whoever got there first. They are not anarchists. Most people who call themselves anarchists are like them.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 10:53 AM
1

Fay marriage? LOL.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 09:43 AM
1

They counted anal rape to include male-on-female anal rape, which became much more common last century, at around the time that a buggery conviction became less stigmatised. That it might include make-on-male anal rape was not contemplated.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 06:28 AM
4

Do you speak from experience?
/r/MensRights24/08/15 06:26 AM
2

Rape is an offence that has outlived it's usefulness. It dates from a time when (known) loss of virginity would destroy a young woman's future marriage prospects, and when it would destroy most married women's marriages. At common law, a man who "raped" his wife could be charged with an assault/battery, but not with rape. This fortifies my argument that it was the social and not physical consequences that were central to the existence of the offence. Rape victims are no longer normally outcasts …
/r/MensRights24/08/15 06:22 AM
1

Funny but wrong.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 06:09 AM
6

She didn't even use the word "sexual". Just "unwanted contact".
/r/MensRights24/08/15 06:05 AM
3

"Man" is not a pronoun. It's a noun.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 08:54 AM
1

It's the difference in sex drive.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 06:40 AM
2

What do you mean? The only pronouns in the comment above were "you're" and "you", and neither was preceded by a pronoun.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 06:35 AM
1

Why not split it?
/r/MensRights18/08/15 06:32 AM
2

Young women do earn more.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 06:32 AM
2

Huh, I wish I could do half the stuff you can, and I'm a guy.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 06:30 AM
1

Well, you got fucked up the ass twice.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 06:27 AM
2

It doesn't have to be an exchange, but it has to be reciprocal. I've got friends I've known for 18 months who have shown themselves to be better friends than some I've known for 20 years.
/r/askTRP14/08/15 02:40 PM
3

Good friends will help you move house. I suppose you could try telling people you might need someone to help you move and see what their response is.
/r/askTRP14/08/15 02:37 PM
2

It was good advice.
/r/askTRP12/08/15 07:37 AM
0

I'd dump her, honestly.
/r/askTRP12/08/15 07:31 AM
1

You're in a bind. Consider finding a less female-dominated workplace.
/r/askTRP12/08/15 07:30 AM
1

From your own link: The hypothesis that human fetuses are capable of perceiving pain in the early stages of a pregnancy has not received sufficient evidence to be proven or disproven; the developmental stage of research and instrumentation is so far insufficient to this task. Any response to the rest of my comment? Is not the capacity to suffer the morally relevant criterion (as you suggested)?
/r/MensRights11/08/15 03:02 PM
1

The brain begins to form around week 5, and by week 10 (2 weeks before you say it's functional) the foetus can make a fist: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002398.htm Surely what matters is whether "there's a being that can suffer" (as you said), not whether it's "a woman's fault" that free health services are not provided. (Of course, many women don't even know they're pregnant till well after this time.)
/r/MensRights11/08/15 02:45 PM
1

You denied saying "any such thing", but you earlier suggested that men treated women "like shit".
/r/MensRights11/08/15 02:36 PM
1

When do you say prostitution became illegal?
/r/MensRights11/08/15 02:34 PM
1

Thanks, but I already joined :)
/r/MensRights11/08/15 02:33 PM
1

You think that sex is aggressive? OK, that says something about your attitude to it.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 02:32 PM
1

When is it genetic and when is it environmental. I'm not trolling. I'm bisexual and don't believe that being gay is genetic at all.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 02:31 PM
1

I'm sorry, but it's just not true that it's only done when the "woman is in danger." When exactly do you think the brain is formed?
/r/MensRights11/08/15 02:29 PM
1

No, you're lucky you have another option.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 12:33 PM
1

It's OK to hate your father for abusing you. It's almost never OK to hate your mother.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 06:51 AM
1

So partial-birth abortion is A-OK with you? Why not infanticide too?
/r/MensRights11/08/15 06:48 AM
1

I'm so sorry.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 06:46 AM
1

I know more guys on steroids than women who actually diet.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 06:36 AM
1

Not where I live.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 06:34 AM
1

Today's society is a lot like the Weimar Republic.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 06:28 AM
1

You'll need a post-nup too if you have kids.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 06:27 AM
1

They'll need it.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 06:25 AM
1

You're a very aggressive person. I'm sure you're finding Lesbianism fulfilling.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 06:11 AM
1

So you weren't "born that way"?
/r/MensRights11/08/15 06:09 AM
1

If it's illegal it's hardly liberated.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 06:07 AM
1

You said: men need to stop treating women like shit
/r/MensRights11/08/15 06:06 AM
1

Do you have any data about which sex initiates breakups the most?
/r/MensRights11/08/15 06:05 AM
1

If men are actually holding women back from succeeding they are, at least in that way, superior.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 05:59 AM
0

Misanthropy isn't discriminatory.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 05:41 AM
1

They're obsessed with power and control, and that's what gets them off. A bit like sex is for men, really, but with the unfortunate side-effect of subjugating other people.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 05:31 AM
0

Come off it. Everyone can judge attractiveness in either sex. Action-movies are marketed to boys and men, not women, and they almost always feature an attractive male lead.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 05:24 AM
1

Which was always widely acknowledged in the case of make adulterers. Not so much in the case of the female of the species.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 05:14 AM
1

And the wives mostly file. They're hardly going to file on the basis that they've committed adultery, even if that were possible.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 05:11 AM
2

Yes.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 05:09 AM
1

Yes. I'd speculate that the average woman who "attempts" suicide does it at least 2 or 3 times. That alone would drop the figures considerably.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 05:07 AM
1

Sad? You're lucky.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 05:02 AM
2

Or a small dose of pills. My wife took 2 of my blood-pressure tablets and called that a suicide attempt.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 04:59 AM
0

I thought Jody was a girl's name.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 04:34 AM
1

If everybody holds doors open for everybody, how does anybody get through doorways?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/15 04:51 AM
1

You'd have to be crazy. Equality: you wanted it, you got it. Yet research shows that men who don't practise "benevolent sexism" are considered sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/15 04:47 AM
1

You don't seem to realize that half the guys in this sub were in your position 10 or 20 years ago.
/r/MGTOW07/08/15 06:49 AM
1

I know. It's breathtaking. Every man I've lived with has been tidy. Only one woman was.
/r/MGTOW07/08/15 06:37 AM
1

They'd listen and then put it out of their minds.
/r/MGTOW07/08/15 06:31 AM
1

I've sworn not to get married again, but she's tempting me ...
/r/MGTOW07/08/15 06:30 AM
1

There are women capable of logical and intellectual discourse. I have a female friend, a very religious Jewish woman, who is one of the best thinkers I know.
/r/MGTOW07/08/15 06:07 AM
1

True it is that it's an offence to have sex with children, but it's not rape. To make out a rape charge allegedly committed against a child, the prosecution must prove non-consent on the part of the child.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 05:50 AM
2

I got one. It's great.
/r/MGTOW06/08/15 07:10 PM
1

Bieber.
/r/MGTOW06/08/15 07:02 PM
1

Charlotte? Chapel Hill? Durham?
/r/MensRights06/08/15 06:37 PM
2

He's one of the most respected forensic psychologists in the country.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 06:21 PM
2

She wasn't convicted of rape. Victoria does not have "statutory rape".
/r/MensRights06/08/15 06:20 PM
1

Where?
/r/MensRights06/08/15 06:05 PM
1

Where do you live?
/r/MensRights06/08/15 06:05 PM
2

Yeah, where the fuck is this?
/r/MensRights06/08/15 06:01 PM
1

He's an attractive guy.
/r/askTRP06/08/15 09:03 AM
3

It's "manifold", but I like manyfold better.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/15 07:14 PM
1

Who is this person? Is he your source of information on why rapists commit rape?
/r/MensRights30/07/15 03:37 AM
2

You don't seem to understand. I was talking about your own comment above where you referred to rapists who didn't know the consonant wasn't consenting, a non sequitur. On what to you base your opinions on rapists' motivations?
/r/MensRights29/07/15 06:22 PM
2

If the defendant wasn't aware the complainant was incapable of consenting, he's not a rapist. None of that goes to my point about the motivations for rape tho.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 05:54 PM
1

I guess some gunplay would spice things up.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 05:40 PM
1

But there are no people terrible enough to say the same things about a man raping a woman at gunpoint. Why?
/r/MensRights29/07/15 05:38 PM
2

The saying that rape is about power is an old canard. To be honest, only a woman could have come up with the idea that rape is "about" power. And only men disinclined to rape could believe it. Except for a minority of psychopathic offenders, rape is a way of obtaining sex with otherwise unavailable individuals. BTW, if he didn't know there was no consent, he's not a rapist.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 05:35 PM
3

You can't argue someone out of a position that he didn't argue himself into.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 05:27 PM
1

I doubt many of you can think of a place or time in recorded history when it has been accepted for men to make such statements about women.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 05:24 PM
1

You mistake my intentions. I'm actually not disgusted or horrified by what happened to me. I don't know anything else. But I can well see why others would be disgusted and horrified. It's a moral wrong that I would not inflict upon another, however anodyne my feelings about my own circumcision may be. The common-law definition of rape (which was confined to penetration of the vagina proper by the penis of a boy over 14 years old) has been extended in most places by statute to include the penetra…
/r/MensRights29/07/15 01:53 AM
1

How does that thing look like an uncircumcised penis?
/r/MensRights29/07/15 12:56 AM
1

it's safe to assume the person doing the cutting doesn't derive pleasure (sexual or sadistic) from it, which rape would. I long for the days when I thought the same ... Also, it's not actually a kind of intercourse. Sure, but neither are many things that can constitute rape. Sticking a medical clamp 1mm past a woman's vulva isn't intercourse.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 12:54 AM
1

Well, circumcision is almost never a religious rite in the United States, so there's a problem with that definition. The only reason why most forms of male circumcision don't constitute male rapes that by way of forced penetration is that there is a frequent legislative requirement that in the case of a man such penetration be vaginal, anal or oral. There is no such requirement in the case of a woman. Setting aside for one moment the laws against female circumcision, almost all types of female c…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 05:06 PM
1

Just out of interest, what do you say the difference is from rape?
/r/MensRights28/07/15 04:34 PM
2

It's my pleasure, then. *BTW, I'm Jewish, and you're lucky you believe in a religion that doesn't mandate the cutting off of parts of baby penises. **One other factor to consider is that while circumcision was a minority thing in America till the '50s, at least in England circumcision was a status-symbol in the early 20th century, and this may have been similar in the USA. They used to take boys out of school for a week at 5 or 15 to keep up with the Joneses. That could have been a factor for yo…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 04:25 PM
2

Freut mich sehr, Wilhelm.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 01:48 PM
4

I don't doubt that everybody in Northern VA (a great place otherwise, BTW) does think that, but I doubt it has any theological justification. The apostle Paul pretty much disposed of any need for Christians to be circumcised. If you asked a Methodist almost anywhere outside the USA, you'd probably be told that Christianity opposes "unnecessary" circumcision, and even if you asked a Methodist minister in Northern VA, I doubt he'd rely on the Bible to argue for circumcision. Quite frankly, circumc…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 01:10 PM
1

I only ask because of your use of the word orthodox. I'm always confused as to why people think (non-Coptic) Christianity encourages circumcision.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 12:55 PM
1

Except that it's almost dead.
/r/askTRP28/07/15 12:05 PM
1

What state?
/r/MensRights28/07/15 08:41 AM
1

It's a vanity thing.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 08:36 AM
-2

Is your family Jewish?
/r/MensRights28/07/15 08:35 AM
3

What do you mean, your dick doesn't look like a pool noodle?
/r/MensRights28/07/15 08:33 AM
8

One would certainly need to cut into the body to produce an equivalent result.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 06:14 PM
39

This goes rather further.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 06:13 PM
70

No children? Forget that. He can't have any sort of normal sexual release.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 06:12 PM
1

I don't see what that has to do with being well groomed.
/r/askTRP27/07/15 01:59 PM
1

What are the ones you know like?
/r/askTRP26/07/15 08:52 PM
1

Often those women have been previously married to men.
/r/askTRP26/07/15 08:51 PM
1

One can see this with feminists as well. Good point. It's often quite difficult to tell the difference between a Lesbian and a feminist. *typo
/r/askTRP26/07/15 08:50 PM
1

It's true they're not hypersexual, but because both partners have the same sex drive more sex is had.
/r/askTRP26/07/15 08:47 PM
1

Indeed male and female homosexuality are different beasts. Lesbians have so little sex for a single, very obvious reason - there is no man involved. Men want sex more often than women, because androgen levels.
/r/askTRP26/07/15 08:45 PM
2

Of course. That is by far the most sensible answer. Unfortunately, nobody will seriously consider it. It would suggest that the causes of Lesbianism and male homosexual behavior may be very different and not genetic.
/r/askTRP26/07/15 08:38 PM
1

I'm not at all surprised. Lesbians are very rare. Every study shows them to be far rarer than exclusive male homosexuals. Fat Lesbians are a thing.
/r/askTRP26/07/15 08:35 PM
4

That's because gay guys know what they want and Lesbians don't.
/r/askTRP26/07/15 08:22 PM
3

She had a high N count - a high narcissism count.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/15 07:03 PM
1

The wife will have gained (even more!) weight too and will exert pressure on the husband not to lose any.
/r/MGTOW26/07/15 04:39 PM
1

Never, to the best of my knowledge, has a more selfish and narcissistic generation existed.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 10:44 AM
3

Doesn't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/15 09:05 AM
1

When did you execute them?
/r/MensRights21/07/15 08:45 PM
3

Uh, it wasn't an experiment, and it didn't purport to be scientific.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 08:41 PM
2

You're right. Post-partum depression is no more than regret at having children.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 03:33 AM
1

You walked out on your partner just in time, didn't you? This girl knows what's up.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 03:21 AM
2

No, we do not "check out" women who look like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 03:15 AM
2

The gentle, downward skills starts about 23. The steepness of the slope increases precipitately around 35, which is the wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 03:03 AM
7

Very wise words. *This is one of the problems of delaying marriage till 30+. In marriage 2.0, wife-goggles are only going to keep the wife aged ~30 in her husband's mind. In marriage 1.0, a woman could remain 20 forever in her husband's eyes.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 02:49 AM
6

She's addicted to being outraged and angry. Any reason will do.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 02:44 AM
2

She probably expected a frosty reception from the other attendees.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 08:31 AM
2

They don't tolerate anarchists who aren't socialist. Hardly surprising.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 05:11 AM
1

If the First Amendment is repealed, maybe ...
/r/MGTOW16/07/15 03:29 PM
3

An extraordinary story, well described by the (female) presenter.
/r/MGTOW16/07/15 02:40 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kPD4LtA1vo
/r/MensRights13/07/15 01:14 PM
1

"Hootananny"??
/r/MensRights13/07/15 01:10 PM
0

"Pop" books a thousand pages long and dominated by data-tables? LOL.
/r/MGTOW13/07/15 12:21 PM
8

It says Coastal Carolina University.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 09:26 AM
2

Theft ordinarily requires an intention permanently to deprive the other of his property. But it would still be tortious.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 09:22 AM
0

The claim that Kinsey's data are "bullshit" is yours to prove. I'll bet you've never read his books. Am I right?
/r/MGTOW10/07/15 04:54 AM
1

All drugs have risks and benefits. I think that a few instances of testicular cancer per 100,000 would be outweighed by 100s or 1000s/100,000 avoiding osteoporosis.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 03:50 AM
0

"Junior"? LOL. I'm quite possibly old enough to be your father. You plainly don't want to have a civilised discussion.
/r/MGTOW08/07/15 05:43 PM
0

Look, if you dismiss things as "bullshit" without giving your reasons (especially on a topic which I've studied in depth), you'll forgive me if I ignore what you say about them.
/r/MGTOW08/07/15 04:21 AM
1

It's nothing to do with political correctness. "Gay" isn't exactly a precise technical term, but it usually means anything homosexual to any degree. Straight means entirely heterosexual. Queer is a slur gays are sometimes called. If what you say is true, then most men are "gay". Kinsey found that ~50% of men had engaged in same-sex sexual activity. That sounds like "homosexual to any degree." "Queer" meant what you say it means ... in 1975. I haven heard anyone use it that way in the last 30 yea…
/r/MensRights08/07/15 04:17 AM
2

It seems to make more sense to say that straight and gay are subsets of bisexual.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 04:12 AM
0

And Capitals!
/r/MensRights07/07/15 09:32 PM
1

There are many laws in Australia that don't confirm to the Universal Declaration.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 09:26 PM
1

The lifestyle of many gay men offers little or nothing to women. Encouraging gay marriage is partly a bid to reduce men's opportunity to have same-sex uncommitted liaisons in the long run (thereby reducing the incentive for men to flee women in favour of other men), and more importantly an advance guard in the real agenda - polyandrous marriages.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 09:17 PM
1

Because this battle wasn't fought by gays and Lesbians, it was fought on their behalf by (mainly straight, female) SJWs and their more moderate Left-seeing allies. Gay marriage is just an advance guard for polyandrous marriage. We don't have the same numbers as SJWs and Leftists.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 09:08 PM
1

The Spectator has long been a great bastion of reason.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 08:58 PM
1

She hasn't been found guilty of anything. She is as entitled to the presumption of innocence as a man. Any men in similar circumstances ought also not be suspended.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 08:47 PM
1

OTOH, he does have Tony Parsons as a dad, which is pretty cool.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 08:39 PM
1

That's just terrible.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 08:30 PM
1

Maybe it actually was his best available option. Some people have hard lives.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 08:27 PM
1

Surely almost nobody could not care that their son killed himself.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 08:25 PM
2

I'm sorry, but they're not really trying. It's a "cry for help."
/r/MensRights07/07/15 08:24 PM
1

Do you think most teenagers do steroids safely?
/r/MensRights07/07/15 08:12 PM
1

Well, testosterone protects bone density in aging.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 08:09 PM
1

I once visited an eating disorders ward in a psychiatric hospital. Every single patient (bar one, an older woman) was female and aged 14-22.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 08:04 PM
1

Very interesting. I hadn't considered that connection.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 07:59 PM
1

It's also veiled-threat-based.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 07:52 PM
0

No, just a wholly government-owned statutory entity. No state involved. /s
/r/MensRights07/07/15 07:17 PM
1

Very insightful.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 07:13 PM
4

How exactly are bisexuals a subset of gay?
/r/MensRights07/07/15 05:43 PM
0

Please elaborate.
/r/MGTOW05/07/15 02:02 PM
1

Hardly any gay guys have gotten (or will get) married. Lesbians OTOH ...
/r/MGTOW04/07/15 06:18 PM
1

Well, I ripped it off from something a notorious man once said about anti-Semitism, but thanks!
/r/MGTOW04/07/15 08:31 AM
2

He's taking a brisk walk, from the sound of it.
/r/MGTOW04/07/15 08:28 AM
2

To feel guilty requires that one first feel a sense of responsibility.
/r/MGTOW04/07/15 07:03 AM
1

Well, it's not generally regarded that way in the field. Are you sure of your ground?
/r/MGTOW04/07/15 06:45 AM
1

I know a lot.
/r/MGTOW03/07/15 09:05 PM
2

A misogynist used to be a man who hated women. Now a misogynist is a man that (some) women hate.
/r/MGTOW03/07/15 07:35 AM
1

One word. Envy.
/r/MGTOW03/07/15 07:28 AM
2

You might want to check out the original movie with Charles Bronson. One of the better films of the 20th century.
/r/MGTOW03/07/15 07:10 AM
2

It's Christianity 2.0, aka Churchianity.
/r/MGTOW03/07/15 07:08 AM
1

I believe marriage originated as a civil act that designate heirs. Western marriage originated as a religious institution. Its state recognition came later. I believe it has to do with mom. Mom may be the first and last woman ever to actually care about you. If you're that lucky.
/r/MGTOW03/07/15 07:04 AM
1

But they didn't get married planning not to have sex, did they? At least he didn't ...
/r/MGTOW03/07/15 07:01 AM
1

It's possible to be both intelligent and foolish.
/r/MGTOW03/07/15 06:46 AM
1

One of life's great ironies (and tragedies) is that women want men to desire then for the same reasons they desire men, and men want women to desire them for the same reasons they desire women.
/r/MGTOW03/07/15 06:07 AM
1

Kinsey found the proportion of predominantly homosexual men was ~10%. A full ~50% of men admitted to engaging in homosexual activity. There is reason to suppose that these figures are low rather than high. (Contrast this with Lesbians, who were much rarer.) That said, I agree that very few gay men will want to get married. If the average straight guy could bed a new chick every week, do you think he'd want to get married?
/r/MGTOW03/07/15 05:18 AM
1

The war was 70 years ago. (Life expectancy in Russia is less than that.) What effect could it have on demographics today?
/r/MGTOW03/07/15 04:50 AM
1

Half the married women I know need IVF anyway, because they delayed marriage and children till their 30s. I don't see a lot of difference.
/r/MGTOW03/07/15 04:44 AM
2

Sorry to be pedantic, but doth is third person singular.
/r/MGTOW03/07/15 04:43 AM
1

Perhaps that's why Lesbians are only half as common as gay guys.
/r/MGTOW03/07/15 04:21 AM
2

What greater ego-boost could there be for a woman than successfully persuading a man who has no sexual interest in women to fuck her?
/r/MGTOW03/07/15 04:19 AM
1

freedom Before you celebrate too much, wait and see what the consequences are of getting a good result for bad (in this case, unconstitutional) reasons. You will see people in the Supreme Court arguing that their newly "discovered" (invented) Fourteenth Amendment right to "dignity" trumps your First and Second Amendment rights.
/r/MGTOW03/07/15 04:17 AM
1

Some gay guys are.
/r/MGTOW03/07/15 03:39 AM
1

Perhaps, but the Court in Obergefell did not rely on the Fifth Amendment.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 06:00 AM
2

Well, let's settle on most.
/r/MGTOW28/06/15 05:11 PM
1

Why? Are you desperate to get married?
/r/MensRights28/06/15 06:30 AM
0

The minority of the Court agreed with him. The number of parties is no greater difference than the sexes of the parties. Roberts even said that it was a shorter leap to polygamy, given its long history, than to gay marriage.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 06:29 AM
1

What's the Fifth Amendment got to do with it?
/r/MensRights28/06/15 06:25 AM
1

Not very well settled.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 06:24 AM
1

I support equality before the law for all. This decision (contrary to most of European history) further cements the idea of marriage as an institution involving the state. There is no reason why the state should be involved, and it's the state's involvement that has screwed men. The next step will be the recognition of polyamorous marriages (see https://np.reddit.com/r/polyamory/comments/3b74e2/next_up_polyamory/), and those seem mostly to involve multiple women and one guy. The effects on relat…
/r/MensRights28/06/15 06:21 AM
2

Every Catholic priest in the last 600 years.
/r/MGTOW28/06/15 06:06 AM
1

Are you saying there were no marriage licences in the USA before miscegenation was legalised? I'm pretty sure a few movies made pre-Loving refer to the characters needing a marriage licence.
/r/MGTOW28/06/15 05:45 AM
1

Not yet. But the reasoning in Obergefell will result in a challenge to that law.
/r/MGTOW28/06/15 05:43 AM
1

The (largely feminist) push for gay marriage was a desperate attempt to make it relevant again.
/r/MGTOW28/06/15 05:42 AM
1

Now that would be "marriage equality"!
/r/MGTOW28/06/15 05:39 AM
0

I agree with you as to the reason why it was originally more offensive. But it's a self-perpetuating cycle.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 07:23 AM
2

Nigger is just a dated, Southern hick pronunciation of the word negro, which was the word MLK used to describe the race.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 02:00 AM
2

How does cunt usually come up in a "medical or formal context"?
/r/MensRights25/06/15 04:12 PM
2

Why shouldn't people say faggot?
/r/MensRights25/06/15 04:11 PM
3

The Quim's English.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 04:09 PM
-2

And they use it often because it's less offensive ...
/r/MensRights25/06/15 04:06 PM
1

The government sets the licence fees, paid to the BBC by everyone who uses a TV set. It is a cliche that the government uses this control over the BBC's income to control its tone.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 06:27 AM
1

Is this you? Or did you get it from someone else?
/r/MGTOW23/06/15 06:46 AM
1

Two words: licence fees.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 06:30 AM
1

clean sheets pill When are they bringing out the messy sheets pill?
/r/MensRights18/06/15 08:19 PM
1

It will bring down a lot of people.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 08:08 PM
1

I wouldn't say the US government has a media mouthpiece in the way that Britain (BBC), Canada (CBC) and Australia (ABC) do.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 07:36 PM
2

Government-owned media mouthpieces are the first step down the road to totalitarianism.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 10:02 PM
0

Lowering them into animal enclosures at the zoo? Putting them on a barbecue?
/r/MensRights17/06/15 09:28 PM
1

That's pretty strange.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 09:26 PM
1

Page doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 09:24 PM
1

Exactly. They're charmed if he does and charmed if he doesn't.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 09:06 PM
2

It's not the website being upvoted, it's the article.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 08:45 PM
2

Dream wife? What a laugh.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 08:41 PM
1

Where I live, it's 6 months if you have a kid. And we passed these laws back in the '80s.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 08:40 PM
2

So Hillary's attempt to reinvent herself encompasses her daughter.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 08:23 PM
2

This issue is bigger than most people realise. In the '60s and '70s it was the priests. In the '80s and '90s it was showbusiness.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 08:22 PM
-6

To me they sound much the same.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 08:17 PM
1

Prostitution is legal where I live, and thus seems crazy.
/r/askTRP17/06/15 11:01 AM
1

Jack Donovan. Off-topic, but are there audiobooks that are faster than normal speech? When I listen to them, they just seem to drag on.
/r/askTRP17/06/15 10:50 AM
2

I bet she didn't cook much.
/r/MGTOW16/06/15 06:55 PM
1

The Vegas prostitutes I've met (not fucked) were not 10s.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/15 06:21 PM
1

I wonder whatever gives them that idea?
/r/MensRights15/06/15 12:53 PM
3

szene German detected.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 12:39 PM
7

Formal equality advantages talented people. They want equality.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 03:43 PM
3

If so, they didn't help their cause with all the profanity.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 03:42 PM
8

Good comment. I would however note that I often flirt with much older (60+) women just for laughs. (I think old women are fun, and they like flirting with me. I would not fuck them.) But unless OP's looks are those of a 60-70-year-old woman, this guy wants to fuck her. She should tell her boyfriend about the panties comment before he finds out himself.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/15 01:29 PM
2

Very well expressed.
/r/MGTOW13/06/15 12:57 PM
2

I'm a short, slim, good-looking, Jewish white guy with no dress sense (except in business settings). I attract spoiled Jewish girls and beautiful Indian girls about to hit the wall. Plus the young gay guys. Guess which I'd rather pick? *In case I wasn't clear, I pick the young gay guys.
/r/askTRP12/06/15 05:26 AM
4

With Anon involved, this might actually get somewhere.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 09:20 PM
8

If there are two sites we shouldn't link directly to, they're Jezebel and the Huffingfat Feminist Post.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 09:11 PM
19

Your aunt is a soulless cunt.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 09:08 PM
4

Very prudent of her.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 09:06 PM
1

He is nice-looking!
/r/MensRights11/06/15 08:51 PM
1

Does this mean that reddit owns the copyright?
/r/AlreadyRed11/06/15 07:49 PM
1

Yeah, they're SJWs.
/r/AlreadyRed11/06/15 07:40 PM
1

I think I've explained that pretty clearly in my numerous comments above. I've come to the view that you are not engaged in an impartial search for truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/15 08:10 AM
1

Also it does break it down further in the pdf by years so if you wanted to know the counts for those under 35 you can run those numbers but I'm too lazy. 15-44 is a good enough span to see the trend. So you basically responded to my original comment with an irrelevancy?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/15 07:24 AM
1

I'm not. It doesn't distinguish between those over 35 and those under 35. Once again, you have not responded to my comment about the annual count of ~2 partners/year.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/15 06:58 AM
1

No, I'm not having any trouble reading. Are you having trouble reading my earlier comment? I spoke of women under 35, who aren't distinguished in your link. No response to my extrapolation of the 12-month figure?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/15 06:11 AM
1

For women, 15-20. With men I prefer 21-29.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/15 10:20 AM
1

That doesn't refer to women under 35 at all. It's not on point. It gives a median partner-count of ~2 within the last 12 months. Assuming 10 years of sexual activity, that's 20. Assuming 5 years, it's 10. Double digits. (If you want to rely on data of such questionable relevance.)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/15 09:57 AM
6

Your comments are really good! How long ago did you make this one?
/r/MGTOW10/06/15 09:52 AM
7

Yes.
/r/MGTOW10/06/15 01:30 AM
5

Source?
/r/MGTOW10/06/15 01:27 AM
1

Point me to the data you're relying on.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/15 01:18 AM
1

I agree. He's good-looking, good humored and fairly charming. She's ordinary-looking and has an attitude problem that's obvious as soon as she gets into the car.
/r/MGTOW10/06/15 01:17 AM
1

Most people aren't currently in the double digits. I'd suggest however that most women under 35 are.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/15 10:20 AM
-1

So what are you going to do about it?
/r/MensRights08/06/15 11:02 AM
1

Have you never had any success with women?
/r/MGTOW08/06/15 09:37 AM
3

He's not exactly an oil-painting either.
/r/MGTOW08/06/15 01:36 AM
3

If you'd spent enough time pretending to be something(s) that you weren't, you might find yourself forgetting who you actually were. Men don't pretend to be bi to get women because women don't want men who are bi. (The man might realize how much putting up with her shit sucks and go out with another dude instead, jeopardizing her major - financial - interest in the relationship.) Instead, men pretend not to be bi to get women.
/r/MGTOW08/06/15 01:26 AM
1

It correlates very strongly with sex-drive, and sex drive correlates very strongly with efforts to approach potential sexual partners.
/r/MGTOW08/06/15 12:16 AM
2

Sounds more like /r/nofap.
/r/MGTOW07/06/15 11:56 PM
1

I don't think all of us are here because we don't do well in the attractiveness stakes. Those guys are on /r/seduction, /r/pua or even /r/TRP. I think most of us are here because despite being able to get women we don't want our hearts (and wallets) broken.
/r/MGTOW07/06/15 11:41 PM
1

I am one, and I do too. It does not occur to anything approaching (pardon the pun) the degree that men approach women, because men have 15 times the testosterone of women.
/r/MGTOW07/06/15 11:39 PM
7

Women will buy drinks for the top 1% or so, sure. But even if you're in the top 5-10%, women know you'll probably offer to pay for the drinks, and they act accordingly.
/r/MGTOW06/06/15 10:37 PM
2

I'd be more annoyed by the chances of being run over than by the beeping (and the whistles!).
/r/MGTOW06/06/15 10:33 PM
14

I also doubt that her smile would have been seen as "inviting" in Japan.
/r/MGTOW06/06/15 10:33 PM
1

I think you mean DDR/GDR. BRD/FRG were the West Germans. I liked the unintentional reference to Roosevelt.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 05:59 AM
1

Interesting post. Unsurprising. Really shitty thread tho.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 11:23 PM
2

FDR? Is that a Freudian slip? You make a very strong point tho.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 11:18 PM
1

I don't agree with you about the USA and Europe, but this cunt is typical of female Reform rabbis.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 11:07 PM
2

They're not open to persuasion any more than most of the circumcised gentiles on reddit, and for the same reasons.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 11:05 PM
1

I'm sorry, that's just mistaken. The law does not let you have overnight custody of your ex's car or house.
/r/MGTOW05/06/15 10:24 PM
1

If you're going to avoid the comments you're not going to be able to see the sexism displayed in them.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 09:47 PM
1

You need to watch to the end. The comments are what's more interesting tho ...
/r/MensRights05/06/15 09:41 PM
1

I agree, but did you watch the video or read the comments?
/r/MensRights05/06/15 09:30 PM
0

Children are not property.
/r/MGTOW04/06/15 05:48 PM
1

I don't understand your question. Would you be more explicit?
/r/altTRP03/06/15 08:14 AM
6

Enjoy your good looks while they last, my friend ;) You're a dude, so you should be good till you're 45.
/r/MGTOW02/06/15 09:03 PM
1

Those are two pretty different things ...
/r/altTRP02/06/15 07:46 PM
1

What about the Public Order Act?
/r/MensRights02/06/15 07:45 PM
1

You're turning this into a personal battle between you and me because people are downvoting you and upvoting me. I'm not voting. Chill. I'm glad to say that I am not now, nor have I ever been, a gentleman.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 01:10 PM
2

I didn't downvote you. I replied. You replied to my reply, accusing me of downvoting you and (paradoxically) not replying. What are you smoking? It's other redditors who are up- and downvoting both of us.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 01:03 PM
1

Who cares what rubbish the police say about it? I think that, if I didnt know, I'd ask a lawyer.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 01:01 PM
1

So is being naked in public without an erection. Almost everyone attending this event is committing the same crime.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 07:22 AM
4

I find it hypocritical that they insist that their nudity is "non-sexual" when they well know that it's the sexual association with nudity that gets them the publicity they seek. They give reasonable advice on what to do if you get an erection while removing your clothes. But most of the people who attend these events don't seem to be carrying anything, and therefore they would have a hard time (no pun intended) putting their pants back on in a hurry if a random boner happened. I find it a very …
/r/MensRights02/06/15 07:16 AM
1

It doesn't seem "inappropriate" to me. How on earth could I help find photos I've never seen?
/r/MensRights02/06/15 07:06 AM
4

Please supply further information. What were the women doing being photographed with him if he was being so "inappropriate"?
/r/MensRights01/06/15 05:21 PM
2

They're either real internet points or imaginary points ...
/r/MensRights01/06/15 05:12 PM
-1

I think the "N-word" really added authenticity. Would you prefer "African-Americans" or "people of color"?
/r/MensRights01/06/15 05:08 PM
12

With what? His bicycle pump or water-bottle? It's a naked bike ride.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 04:00 PM
14

male rider unattractive man becomes 'aroused' FTFY. If he had been a hot guy he'd be on every second tumblr.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 03:58 PM
2

TIL. Thank you for correcting me.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 11:42 AM
1

It's not clear why he regards infant circumcision as necessary to indulge his own or women's ostensible preferences in adult men.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 09:59 AM
1

And you should do it to your newborn sons, too, as early into their lives as possible. People like this want routine infant circumcision because they like looking at little boys' circumcised penises. It turns them on. (Otherwise they'd let the kid decide later.) I just wish they'd be honest about it.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 06:11 AM
1

That second link reads like envy. And TIL that if I weren't circumcised I could ejaculate "like a horse."
/r/MensRights30/05/15 06:07 AM
1

SOP. Honestly, I I can't think of any circumstance in which I'd call the police except to get a report for my insurance company after a burglary.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 05:58 AM
1

You would be well advised not to discuss this on your reddit account.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 05:54 AM
1

You might prefer another term, but I don't see anything inaccurate about this one. Intact = natural = uncut. Whether it's "normal" depends on where you live.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 05:39 AM
1

Australia? What do you expect?
/r/MensRights30/05/15 05:37 AM
5

Waited forever you mean?
/r/MensRights30/05/15 05:30 AM
1

Or maybe she could do Leia's job for Jabba.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 05:29 AM
1

They've been doing this for years. Why would you go there?
/r/MensRights30/05/15 05:21 AM
2

Isn't there? I thought it was well known that the pyramids were built by slaves.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 05:13 AM
1

Oh Canada ...
/r/MensRights30/05/15 05:10 AM
5

Jesus, I'm getting old.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 05:09 AM
3

Feminism was designed to take advantage of gynocentrism, which ironically (if it's really all about equality) should be its sworn enemy.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 04:34 AM
3

Well, they did take over the western world, didn't they?
/r/MensRights30/05/15 04:19 AM
3

The genie is out of the bottle, and they're awfully difficult to put back in.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 04:17 AM
12

You've had abortion legalized for 40+ years and gays getting married in some states for 10+. You've had open access to all kinds of pornography for decades. Coming from a part of the (secular, socialist) world where there is no gay marriage, porn is heavily censored and abortion was legalized 10 years ago, it doesn't seem like much of a stranglehold to me.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 03:49 AM
1

Very comfortably indeed, I think. There are many gay men on this sub.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 11:24 AM
1

My wife "attempted suicide" once. She took two of my blood-pressure pills. Two.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 11:21 AM
1

They know how to do that to. But they want to wake up.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 11:17 AM
1

Because men are violent. /s
/r/MensRights25/05/15 11:16 AM
1

I don't hate women. I want them to be treated equally before the law. But I certainly don't want to have sex with them.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 11:13 AM
1

Language changes over time. Misogyny used to mean saying things that showed hatred of women. Now it means saying things women hate. /s
/r/MensRights25/05/15 11:08 AM
1

I don't care what sex the child is. I would posit that sexual contact with a sexually experienced person is less likely to be psychologically harmful than with an inexperienced one.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 11:04 AM
1

It might look draconian for a court to order circumcision of a boy against his will.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 10:51 AM
1

I think radical feminism is a kind of narcissism really.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 10:46 AM
2

Gay rights shouldn't depend on the etiology of homosexuality.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 10:04 AM
0

You can't see into my mind. I was pointing out that it isn't the same for everyone.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 09:08 AM
1

Unless you're a certain unfortunate Brazilian, I agree.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 09:07 AM
1

People rarely die from being stabbed once (let alone by themselves!). (On this, I speak from considerable experience.) Jumping off a cliff is not a quick death either. Even skydivers whose parachutes don't open frequently survive for a considerable time. Most people don't have the street-smarts to lay hands on 1g of heroin. I'm making excuses for nobody (I think suicide is wrong), I'm just illustrating that the ways of offing oneself in tightly regulated societies are limited.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 08:53 AM
3

It doesn't fuss me. I'm used to it. I take the bad with the good.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 08:48 AM
0

How does reporting my friend's view make me disgusting? Do you think I'm joking or something?
/r/MensRights24/05/15 09:49 PM
1

Everyone had agency. And "suicide-by-cop" is mostly an invention of homicidal cops trying to save their skins.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 09:47 PM
1

Hanging isn't quick. The UK has banned guns for almost everyone. His options were limited.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 09:45 PM
0

I'm not so sure. A friend of mine is a train-driver. He's had 5 so far. He likes the paid time off.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 09:44 PM
1

Where is your heart?
/r/MensRights24/05/15 09:42 PM
1

And they once made beautiful loudspeakers. I don't know whether they still do.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 09:41 PM
9

Men aspire, but women resent.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 09:28 PM
-10

For the Left generally, TBH.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 09:13 PM
2

Hermitic?
/r/MGTOW24/05/15 07:44 PM
2

You know, I think you should read /r/TheRedPill as well as this sub. You might find that you don't want to go the whole hog.
/r/MGTOW24/05/15 07:40 PM
2

They're powerful, they're charming, and they're often quite good-looking (the sex-killers anyway). They're the ultimate bad-boys. And you know how many women like the idea of fixing wounded birds. Plus, they're safely locked away in prison.
/r/askTRP23/05/15 04:13 PM
1

I agree with your fundamental argument, but I don't think that theoretical physics actually allows you to "test your hypothesises in the physical world."
/r/MensRights20/05/15 07:11 PM
1

I appreciate the thought you put into your comment. And I'm genuinely flattered to be called a young person!
/r/MensRights19/05/15 05:27 PM
1

True. The same might be said of theoretical physics though.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 03:39 AM
3

What exactly is the reason for your obsession with circumcision (as demonstrated by your numerous, lengthy and disorganized comments in this thread)? It appears (from a quick survey of your comment history) that there is absolutely nothing about which you are so passionate that you feel constrained to go to these lengths.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 11:24 PM
2

I've seen Europa, Europa. It's one of my favorite films. "Having every circumcised", as you put it, means mandatory circumcision. If (non-)circumcision had been the parental choice of the parents of the characters in the film (which of course it was in central Europe at that time), most men would have been uncircumcised (as of course they were), and the events in the film would have transpired exactly as they did. You (presumably a gentile, or at least not an observant Jew) don't think it's righ…
/r/MensRights18/05/15 10:53 PM
2

Which is it, mandatory circumcision or parental choice? Parental choice won't stop Nazis identifying Jews. (But banning routine infant circumcision would.)
/r/MensRights18/05/15 10:24 PM
1

But at the same time they say that women are just as sexual as men.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 06:03 PM
0

The problem becomes more severe when the "strong" group is actually weak and the "weak" group is actually strong.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 05:49 PM
1

She threatened to do exactly that.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 05:45 PM
1

How do you explain a paternity test to "your" kid?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 05:44 PM
1

Or perhaps both.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 05:39 PM
3

Not many men on this planet are circumcised. Maybe a third. Hardly any Jews obey all (or even most) of the 613 mitzvot set out by Maimonides. But they still cling to the one that involves cutting off bits of baby-dicks, even when they haven't been to shul in years. How would I know the benefits of having a foreskin? I'm a circumcised Jew. *Do you promote mandatory circumcision? (You've been arguing for parental choice till now.) If not, I don't see how your emotive argument involving Europa, Eur…
/r/MensRights18/05/15 05:22 PM
1

Revolution commonly follows serfdom.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 05:17 PM
1

People get away with what we allow them to get away with.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 05:13 PM
5

So does circumcision of no-one. That's my point. The way it's supposed to be? Evolution disagrees.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 05:07 PM
1

If everyone was circumcised how could the Holocaust happen? Reductio ad Hitlerum.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 05:02 PM
1

If you'ever ever seen Europa, Europa, you probably realize how beneficial non-circumcision could also be an effort to thwarting the rise of Nazis. FTFY.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 04:59 PM
1

I (male) am on a perpetual diet. Because I don't want to look like a lardass. Is that the patriarchy too?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 04:43 PM
1

Latham used to espouse the same nonsense he's criticizing here.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 04:42 PM
1

As a criminal lawyer I did rape cases. Many of the complainants were telling the the truth about the fact of the main incident (there are usually several incidents) - i.e. that there was a rape - , but I can't remember one case where a complainant told the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Sometimes details of the incident and surrounding events were fabricated. Equally often, other alleged incidents of rape were fabricated to prejudice the accused.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 04:36 PM
2

A lot of people seem to have trouble getting vasectomies and tubals. (Some vasectomy providers even require written permission from the female partner.) I subscribe to /r/childfree, and it is a constant bugbear there that permanent sterilization (regardless of cost) is so hard to obtain. *I see that Planned Parenthood will do a vasectomy only if you're over 21.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 04:22 PM
3

You actually got a laugh out of me with that.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 04:17 PM
4

The key time post-birth sounds like a good time for adoption, unless the father wants to take over.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 04:15 PM
8

It troubles me that nobody on that subreddit seemed willing to debate social "science".
/r/MensRights18/05/15 04:11 PM
16

A six-gun makes all men equal.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 03:35 PM
1

It still defines the population at the moment, so I'd argue it's still an Australian thing. On your argument it's now not even an American thing either, since it's now around 50/50 for babies there. Foreskins would hardly be the "secret" referred to in the headline.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 05:06 PM
2

It has nothing to do with being Catholic.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 05:09 AM
2

Catholicism opposes circumcision.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 05:08 AM
1

Sure, but if you look at the whole population it's probably a majority.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 05:07 AM
1

They want it to fall back on.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 10:06 AM
1

And if you're outside CA, WA, OR and AZ it's probably still over 75%.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 10:50 AM
1

It would have been a good idea to have them pinned.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 10:41 AM
1

How do you know it wasn't his father?
/r/MensRights13/05/15 10:30 AM
0

It sounds like the now-debunked link between vaccination and autism.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 10:29 AM
1

It's not criminal. He can sue for libel if he wants.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 10:20 AM
0

But most women (including feminists) don't want to destroy marriage. Quite the contrary.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 10:04 AM
1

It's real. Genioplasty has been tried and tested for 70 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/15 09:13 AM
1

Plastic surgeons have reported that it is common.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/15 09:10 AM
1

On the contrary, I think that facial plastic surgery has the potential to be of greater aesthetic benefit to men than women. Most aesthetic facial procedures women undertake are to give the skin a youthful appearance. That isn't so important for men. Meanwhile, there are many plastic surgery procedures involving movement of and grafting to the facial bones, as well as the placement of implants, that have the ability to completely restructure the face. Those are of great benefit to ugly men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/15 09:08 AM
2

Therapists aren't allowed to screw their patients because the therapeutic relationship might enable them to exploit their patients. Think about that.
/r/askTRP13/05/15 08:30 AM
3

You would not believe the things I've seen churchy women do. Most of them treat their churches like beta-bucks dating agencies. Then they fuck around. And nobody has any problem with it, because forgiveness.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 01:27 PM
3

Men are the true aesthetes, gay or straight.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 01:13 PM
2

There's a good chance that now may be the time to start. Most men have at least some recession by the time they're 25 or so. Visit /r/tressless if you're interested.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 04:44 AM
-2

I know he wasn't trying to say that.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 04:43 AM
-5

Language matters. Personally, I'd just describe both groups as circumcised.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 04:42 AM
1

They're not Orthodox. The Orthodox don't do it for religious reasons. Americans do it basically as cosmetic surgery.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 04:41 AM
2

How old are you?
/r/MensRights07/05/15 04:07 PM
1

Australia has never had DNA-testing at birth. No mainstream political party here would dare support that.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 04:01 PM
1

You could have a platonic live-in relationship with a friend. Why would it have to be a (perhaps) sexual partner? *undo autocorrect
/r/MensRights07/05/15 03:58 PM
1

That is a myth.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 03:53 PM
1

I don't think so. I think he was implying that most want bigger boobs.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 03:53 PM
1

'Twas always thus, and always thus will be.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 03:49 PM
1

Economics: the fairer discipline.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 03:47 PM
1

In her particular case, I would have been happy to pay my share of the storage fees ...
/r/MensRights07/05/15 03:44 PM
1

Just because they're not to your taste doesn't mean they're not pretty.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 03:32 PM
1

Many more women get implants than breast-reductions.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 03:29 PM
1

You have control over hair-loss. There's a pill (finasteride) that will stop it in its tracks.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 03:25 PM
2

Just remember that your vulnerabilities can be used against you later. Decades later.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 02:38 PM
1

Add the numbers for HPD and BPD (which have narcissistic features and are predominantly female) and women would probably come out ahead.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 02:37 PM
1

It's the result of a bad partner.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 02:27 PM
2

Be careful with that.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 02:26 PM
1

It's so ironic. Rodger rejected almost everything in the "manosphere". He was a regular on the now-defunct puahate.com.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 01:42 PM
1

Women will support this sentiment because they want to keep their victim status. Men (in America) will support it because they don't want to believe that their genitals have been irreparably altered in a way that would be illegal if they were female. Disclosure: I'm circumcised and not bitter about it.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 01:34 PM
1

Well, the Catholic Church specifically opposes it.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 01:31 PM
1

Orthodox Christians? I think that's a mistake.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 01:31 PM
2

Government-funded media have never been, and will never be, neutral and impartial.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 01:09 PM
3

On reddit I see far more misandry than misogyny, more heterophobia than homophobia, more racism against whites than in their favour. And I don't even hang out in the (many) SJW subs.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 01:07 PM
6

That's because they talk and do makeup in there. Most guys can't get out fast enough.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 12:58 PM
-4

So men "are circumcised" while women "are victims"?
/r/MensRights07/05/15 12:56 PM
1

I didn't lie. Your behavior is discourteous and reflects poorly on your character. The fact there are many other ways to gerrymander doesn't deny they this can be used to gerrymander. Is not as simple as "registered voters = lines" As you claim not to know, voting in primaries influences who the major parties'candidates are. (And they have not been all bad for a hundred years.)
/r/MensRights04/05/15 08:27 PM
21

He did have a particularly repellent wife in Winnie. But your point stands.
/r/MGTOW04/05/15 08:14 PM
0

The more people moderate their speech, the more moderate speech will be seen as sexist. You can't make them happy by capitulating to the policing of language, and there's no point trying.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 08:07 PM
1

I think it's obvious how voting on primaries could help. Don't condescend to me. Registration is a tiny part of the gerrymander.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 08:05 PM
0

I don't think it's generally misogynistic, in the sense of biased.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 07:56 PM
1

As to your link: TRPers don't let "plates" live in. There's this thing in rhetoric called saying what you mean. You're not doing it.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 07:54 PM
1

That's where you live together.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 07:52 PM
1

Is there that much difference?
/r/MensRights04/05/15 07:51 PM
1

But you can vote in the primaries.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 07:50 PM
3

You haven't been honest about your moderation policy. Your moderation policy is to silence your critics and appoint your cronies as moderators. It should just be called /r/redpillschool.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 07:50 PM
2

Do you think that's because you live in America? Or is there something inherently attractive about the circumcised penis? Sorry, I thought you meant generally pleasing, not to you specifically.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 07:48 PM
1

Tretinoin. No acne and better skin. Be careful.
/r/askTRP04/05/15 07:25 PM
2

That claim will look legitimate in the eyes of "everyone" anyway. Get the picture Sweet Christ on a recumbent bicycle.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 08:30 PM
1

Absolute bullshit. The police in Australia hardly ever charge anyone with baking a false report in a sex case.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 08:24 PM
1

In other words, she admitted she was lying.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 08:23 PM
2

Is this headline deliberate? Reminds me of an Australian school that commemorated a pedophile teacher with the plaque: "He touched us all."
/r/MensRights02/05/15 08:20 PM
1

He had no problem getting it up at that age?
/r/MensRights02/05/15 08:14 PM
-1

You said: We are seeing rulings asserting long term girlfreinds (plates) can claim alimony. That is just not correct, and its falsehood was the reason for my comment. I don't agree with you that /r/TRP views the rules as stationary.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 07:56 PM
2

I'd rather be drafted into WW1 in that society than drafted into Gulf War 3 in this.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 07:52 PM
1

I think the political thing is because there seem to be more Brits/Europeans here than on /r/TRP.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 07:51 PM
0

You didn't "raise questions". You made statements.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 07:48 PM
1

The stereotype existed before /r/TRP existed. I remember. Do you?
/r/MensRights02/05/15 07:41 PM
2

You think feminists need /r/TRP to call us sexist? Come off it.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 07:34 PM
2

You personally have been the worst abuser of mod powers on /r/TRP.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 07:32 PM
1

/r/TRP's mods are just corrupt.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 07:31 PM
1

A lot of evopsych is unproven speculation.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 07:28 PM
1

Most TRPers seem to be under 25, and I get the impression that this sub's members are older than the average for reddit.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 07:24 PM
0

/r/TRP seems to have started as an offshoot of this sub, so far as I can tell. (I was one of the first subscribers there.)
/r/MensRights02/05/15 07:20 PM
1

Hence MGTOW.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 07:19 PM
1

The main problem with it is that it's run by a bunch of narcissists (with correspondingly fragile egos), some of whom try to use it to make a buck for their externally hosted sites.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 07:19 PM
2

I read /r/TRP, and I only date dudes. Maybe that will be regarded as discrimination soon.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 07:16 PM
2

I guess it shows how different people are. I come here for a dose of outrage, which fortifies my spirits.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 07:14 PM
1

Thanks for the giggle.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 07:12 PM
1

MGTOW, if it's widely adopted enough, has the best chance of influencing politics. Perhaps the personal is political after all?
/r/MensRights02/05/15 07:09 PM
5

Does your brother know anything about the MRM? All men who want something are called bitter and whiny - except those who demand it, who are called aggressive and domineering.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 07:07 PM
1

Our letters, marches and petitions will do shit. Meetings? It depends what kind of meetings you're talking about. Frankly, our best allies are probably mothers of adult sons. They're women, so they'll be listened to. Maybe all of us who can should seek to persuade our mothers to do something. Their letters, petitions and marches might help.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 07:05 PM
1

I'm up for a revolution if you are.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 06:59 PM
2

I don't think they like the name ...
/r/MensRights02/05/15 06:52 PM
0

Wait, you don't like it because it seems American?
/r/MensRights02/05/15 06:51 PM
1

I'm not sure which party is the strangler and which the disemboweler.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 06:48 PM
-1

You think the plates think they're living together when they're not? That's as far as alimony law goes at the moment.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 06:47 PM
4

It's very good advice. Follow it, and consider whether you really want to expose yourself to this totalitarian regime by living with your girlfriend.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 06:44 PM
-1

"Plates" don't live under a redpiller's roof, so they aren't entitled to alimony.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 06:17 PM
1

What about a nice constitutional oligarchy?
/r/MensRights02/05/15 06:09 PM
1

That's like choosing whether you want to be strangled or disemboweled.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 06:08 PM
1

Or register for one of the two major parties and then vote independent.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 06:08 PM
2

Well, it's not a direct election, so these things happen. I'm sure Democrats in South Dakota or somewhere feel the same way.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 06:07 PM
5

If only she would take us back 100 years ...
/r/MensRights02/05/15 06:05 PM
2

Yeah. Predators eat you, not let you fuck them.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 06:03 PM
1

This is being completely misunderstood.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 05:57 PM
1

That was a centuries-old rule, which didn't apply to females, that this legislation abolished.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 05:55 PM
-1

It was a plea deal. Both sides probably agreed on the sentence they wanted and made submissions accordingly.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 02:20 PM
3

The Maori hold you to ransom. And one payment won't be enough. It will just continue.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 04:03 PM
0

It's not justified where it offends human rights.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 04:02 PM
2

I think Australia is second-worst after Canada.
/r/MGTOW01/05/15 03:45 PM
1

I suppose it depends whether it's a monogamous marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 02:55 PM
1

That is so ironic.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 07:14 AM
1

He's a communist SJW.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 07:06 AM
1

Well, he was a member of sluthate* ... *Who fundamentally disagree with TRP and MGTOW.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 07:05 AM
1

They love dem options.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 06:44 AM
1

Off-label prescribing of all drugs is commonplace.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 06:15 AM
3

Tearful women with bad hair looking like they've just swallowed a lemon, and beautiful women walking on the beach.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 06:14 AM
1

You mistake me. I'm not arguing anything. I'm making an observation that others may use to mount an argument.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 11:30 PM
2

She's just a regular, banal psychopath.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:37 PM
2

This is the truth, for better or worse.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:25 PM
1

Frankly, many men and women get off on circumcision.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:23 PM
1

The "contraption" comes in all sizes up to and including large adult.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:22 PM
1

At least she's asking for it.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:20 PM
1

Why is either appealing to the opposite gender?
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:19 PM
1

I agree with your sentiments, but the executive has no such power.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:17 PM
1

How big do you say this movement is? How many people?
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:15 PM
1

It makes the Mail look good.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:13 PM
1

Few accused names are suppressed in South Australia unless it's sex, where it's to protect the victim. When the names are suppressed in a discretionary process it's to protect the accused. That's there point.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:05 PM
1

But then some depressed guy flies a plane into a mountain.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:51 PM
0

They're not mutually exclusive ...
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:41 PM
0

He's probably keen on it ending.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:41 PM
1

Variety is the spice of life. And he has a point.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:39 PM
0

If Mattress Girl doesn't want to take her medication orally, I'm sure we can arrange that she can have it some other way. But I don't think that she would like it.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:38 PM
1

I think he means religious people.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:33 PM
0

She knows it's crap. She feels the heat at her tail, and she's on the run.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:32 PM
1

Most of them. Ted is a cultural-Marxist echo-chamber. A self-important one.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:29 PM
1

Who was the second speaker?
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:23 PM
1

Do you even know what enormity means? It means wickedness. Appropriate.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:12 PM
1

This.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:09 PM
1

Plenty of 14-year-olds have better functioning brains than people twice their age.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:00 PM
1

"The Devil put the dinosaur bones there." And the Devil is The Patriarchy™.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 07:48 PM
1

To persuade someone of anything, his mind must be open to bring changed. That doesn't seem to be the case here.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 07:44 PM
1

I don't think you're an MRA.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 07:36 PM
1

We are the 99%.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 07:35 PM
1

That takes selflessness.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 07:28 PM
1

Only sex cases are subject to automatic suppression. That's described in the link you posted.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 07:12 PM
1

I'm talking about this jurisdiction, South Australia. It's known as the "suppression order state", but it's not automatic by any means.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 06:48 PM
5

Some of the shortest girls are the most preoccupied with getting tall guys in my experience.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:51 AM
4

They only do that in sex cases.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:41 AM
4

Welcome to Australia. Is it any wonder so much of the male population leaves in their 20s?
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:38 AM
6

She's not hot ...
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:36 AM
4

Feminism is for men too. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 05:55 AM
0

Men have no aversion to dating taller women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 05:53 AM
1

Female promiscuity is positively correlated with marriage failure (which make promiscuity isn't). (Most men have no problem fucking and chucking sluts.) Male height is positively correlated (to a small but significant degree) with male earnings. I suppose it depends which motive is less dishonorable: wanting one's wife to be faithful, or wanting one's husband to earn more money.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 05:48 AM
2

No. In fact, doctors regard themselves as having a duty not to reveal the truth. If pressed, they tell the "fathers" that these "genetic anomalies" are "not uncommon". The smartest "fathers" often work it out tho.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:21 AM
3

And keeps paying ...
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:13 AM
1

Yes, that is the default.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:34 PM
3

"attempt"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 05:54 AM
3

I don't like Jeb, but she makes him look good.
/r/MGTOW24/04/15 02:11 PM
7

And shopping, apparently.
/r/MGTOW24/04/15 02:08 PM
1

You have misunderestimated /u/DavidByron2.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 08:57 AM
1

Like the Territorial Army (in UK) or Army Reserve (in Australia) university regiments.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 08:53 AM
1

And when will we see a white woman convicted of raping a black man?
/r/MensRights22/04/15 05:09 PM
0

You're a rude fuck as well as a sloppy one, aren't you? sedition You've got to be kidding me.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 02:36 AM
1

Now you're praising her for not making false rape accusations!
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:33 PM
2

Bingo.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 07:25 PM
0

Sex is not something men do, to women. On that point I respectfully disagree.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 07:22 PM
1

Ouch.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 07:18 PM
24

You wrote: Did any of you actually read the entire thing? "Coleen" is not being sexist, she is also clearly disgusted by the girls actions as well. NOBODY said "it's the men's fault" Coleen wrote to her correspondent: I’m sad because you think so little of yourself that you’ve allowed these men to use you. You're telling me that she's not blaming the male participants? Come off it.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 07:12 PM
4

One small step for crew; one giant leap for crewkind.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 07:17 PM
2

skepdick.com?
/r/MensRights12/04/15 06:52 PM
1

According to the article, he is pleading to conspiracy.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 06:51 PM
1

Horrorshow to viddy another ACO-lover here!
/r/MensRights12/04/15 06:50 PM
2

The American system seems better.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 03:49 PM
1

What, it's only $25 to stand for the US Senate? In Australia, it's hundreds if not thousands.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 02:23 PM
1

No guy wants to think about the fact that some other guy has a "better" dick than he.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 05:59 AM
1

Crimes against women are best quantified by anonymous self-reporting in telephone surveys. Those against men are best quantified by published data on convictions. /s
/r/MensRights09/04/15 02:49 AM
3

Contrast this with the treatment meted out to Robert Farquarson (spelling?) in a similar case in Melbourne a few years ago. The media had convicted him almost before the 3 children's bodies were pulled from the water. Now he's doing life. When men kill, they're evil. When women kill, it's a tragedy that they were "failed by the system."
/r/MensRights09/04/15 02:43 AM
1

Chefs. Actors. Musicians. Writers. Journalists. Interior designers. The fields where women are most successful are those least amenable to objective assessment.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 02:37 AM
4

But nobody does, do they?
/r/MensRights09/04/15 02:33 AM
2

Are not victims of violent crime not routinely encouraged to co-operate to reduce the likelihood of offending against others?
/r/MensRights09/04/15 02:31 AM
2

Maybe it will be like South Korea, where (I understand) you have to input your ID details to gain internet access. Of course, that's so the government can monitor your internet use generally. Will that be the next step in the UK?
/r/MensRights05/04/15 05:28 AM
2

That doesn't explain the female reaction tho.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 05:23 AM
1

Then that's not his true waist.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 04:40 AM
1

Get a grip dude.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 04:15 AM
2

But it's already the norm and has been for decades.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 04:04 AM
1

In a just world she wouldn't need a license either.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 04:02 AM
1

But you know it's not going to happen, don't you? Not without a revolution anyway.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 04:02 AM
1

Linky?
/r/MensRights05/04/15 04:01 AM
2

I know you are, you said you are, but what am I? Is this the quality of comment you want to leave for posterity?
/r/MensRights05/04/15 03:59 AM
1

I can't speak for you, but I don't know any ladies.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 03:47 AM
1

Forgive my ignorance (or diminished soothsaying ability), but to whom are you referring?
/r/MensRights05/04/15 03:44 AM
2

Does the plantation-owner empathize with the slave? Or the lion with the gazelle?
/r/MensRights05/04/15 03:35 AM
1

I thought you were "gonna be the big man here"?
/r/MensRights05/04/15 03:26 AM
1

You seem to be a very angry person. There are many techniques you could use to control your anger. Some are even advocated on /r/TRP.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 03:25 AM
1

You actually mean "politically correct" as a compliment???
/r/MensRights05/04/15 03:19 AM
0

I've been banned by them half a dozen times, but I don't let it affect my objectivity.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 03:18 AM
0

Maybe there is a significant overlap in the user-base?
/r/MensRights05/04/15 03:16 AM
2

They're gonna need it.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 04:21 PM
2

Of course, it would never be made in Hollywood. The (significantly Jewish) entertainment establishment would hardly welcome such an "anti-Semitic" parody as this. I'm sure that between Wolfson, Stahl and Kamerman they can impartially resolve this religious/cultural dispute while blinding themselves to their own religious/cultural backgrounds ... /s
/r/MensRights04/04/15 03:24 PM
1

Or good childhood experiences with boys ...
/r/altTRP27/03/15 04:53 AM
1

If they're relevant ...
/r/MensRights27/03/15 04:21 AM
3

If they identified her they would be identifying her daughter.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 05:44 PM
1

The previous theft sentence is not a relevant antecedent (prior conviction). It is a completely different type of crime. Australian law (and the law of England, Ireland, New Zealand, and probably many other places from South Africa to Belize) does not regard a prior conviction for (typically) theft as relevant to ones propensity to commit violent crime, for example. However, a man in the same situation would have got actual jail time.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 05:33 PM
2

A cryptic comment.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 05:57 PM
1

The perfect username for a narcissistic, bisexual elitist ...
/r/MensRights21/03/15 05:53 PM
3

No matter how far you've gone down the wrong road, turn back.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 03:02 AM
1

Is he hot?
/r/askTRP15/03/15 03:44 AM
1

A few decades after they hit the wall they're often forced to work on their personalities.
/r/askTRP15/03/15 03:38 AM
2

Your argument that ambiguous (and therefore plausibly deniable) communication is superior to precise communication is laughable.
/r/askTRP15/03/15 03:35 AM
-2

You'll hire the hot girl over the hot guy. Why? Because men pay most of the restaurant bills. Female privilege strikes again.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 03:22 AM
1

Are you not, in your own opinion, a "crook"?
/r/MensRights15/03/15 03:18 AM
2

Yes.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 03:11 AM
1

The only point on which I take issue with you is to note that the Athenians ate dinner with their boyfriends.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 03:08 AM
0

My God. How long will it take before people wake up to the fact that these international protocols are often (usually?) fatally flawed?
/r/MensRights06/03/15 04:49 PM
13

There has been outrage about the men in the UK as well - outrage about how evil they are. Female hypoagency strikes again.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 02:22 AM
1

The only way to deal with trolls is to limit your response to reminding others not to engage with trolls.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 04:19 AM
0

I would argue with you, but I remember your username, so I won't be baited.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 04:06 AM
1

Surely there's more money in arguing that it's not innate and therefore is reversible.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 03:53 AM
3

Then post it.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 03:49 AM
2

Muscle mass is not size.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 03:43 AM
0

You said: The only time you run into a problem is if you were you publish something like "Why I think we should murder all the Jews and how I sincerely mean it" in which case there have been cases of people receiving small fines. Once again, you were wrong. Memory laws are designed not to limit or prohibit hate speech, but prevent historical revisionism. What is your basis for this assertion? Are there similar laws prohibiting historical revisionism about (say) the Boston Tea-Party?
/r/MensRights12/01/15 01:35 AM
2

if you two girls were told to wear bin bags as a bad joke You know it was a "joke"? Were you the teacher involved? maybe other people would be more outraged... I think its inappropriate, I just don't really find it that crazy of an issue. You don't think that a teacher's threats to mutilate his female students' genitals would result in a widespread outcry? I have a hard time imagining it was much more than a silly punishment prank from a teacher who made a bad joke. Your imagination is not evide…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 12:57 AM
0

David Irving was sued by a private citizen in civil court for libel. That's a non-issue in this conversation. Libel is another matter entirely. Wrong. He was jailed in Austria. Earnst Zuendel was charged under the criminal code in Ontario for spreading false news. Wrong. He was jailed in Germany. Robert Faurisson wasn't charged for hate speech, he was charged under what is called a "memory law" for publishing denials of the holocaust. Which is a species of "hate speech". There are no countries t…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 12:45 AM
1

Ernst Zuendel. David Irving. Robert Faurisson. That should be enough for starters. Also the former Baader-Meinhof lawyer turned neo-Nazi, (whose name escapes me). I'm very surprised that you don't seem to know anything about this.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 05:17 PM
1

"Pranks"??? Reverse the fucking genders.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 04:31 PM
1

Numerous people have been imprisoned for so-called hate-speech in Germany and France (which latter country apparently now regards itself as a paragon of freedom of speech) among other countries.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 04:25 PM
11

Go away.
/r/MGTOW05/01/15 12:03 AM
3

You think men like good looks because they indicate or constitute power? Please.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/15 05:21 PM
1

But men won't be willing to have sex with Rosanne Barr to get a relationship. Women apparently are willing to have sex with Kissinger.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/15 05:16 PM
1

What a cunt.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/15 05:12 PM
1

Well, men rarely (if ever) are attracted to those qualities, so the answer is yes, if women are to any significant degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/15 05:08 PM
1

Me too. I spent years trying to get my parents to divorce.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 02:32 AM
0

Anecdotal discussions with women I know and published research I read a few years ago. (I'm just answering your question, not relying on that unidentified research to persuade you. Please have a look for some research on the subject before you ask me for a citation. Once again, I'm not seeking to persuade you of anything.)
/r/MensRights03/01/15 02:31 AM
2

Well, you didn't answer my question, but I'll bite. The relative happiness of children of divorced parents, as compared with their fathers, is reflected in their suicide rates.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 02:26 AM
1

deserve (dɪˈzɜːv) vb 1. (tr) to be entitled to or worthy of; merit 2. (foll by: of) to be worthy
/r/MensRights03/01/15 02:23 AM
1

Historically it wasn't, and it still isn't in many places. There are usually separate crimes now for sexual misconduct falling short of rape.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 04:12 PM
1

No, it had to be penile penetration of the complainant's vagina.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 04:03 PM
0

No. The common law historically defined rape as vaginal penetration against the complainant's will. Men don't have vaginas and therefore historically couldn't be raped. Anal sex with either a man or a woman was the separate crime of buggery/sodomy, and consent was irrelevant. So all male "rapes" were prosecuted as buggery (where consent was technically irrelevant). By the 19th century the majority of buggery prosecutions related to allegations of non-consensual anal sex or anal sex with minors.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 03:44 PM
1

How do people keep a straight face?
/r/MensRights02/01/15 03:25 PM
1

You now say: I don't think that anyone is entitled to pampering. Before you said: (they deserve the pampering because even as a guy its obvious carrying a developing person is hard) Which is it?
/r/MensRights02/01/15 03:20 PM
2

No, I was primarily asking a question (which you haven't responded to yet) and secondarily suggesting that women usually contemplate ending their relationships (including their martial relationships) very frequently for most of their duration.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 03:11 PM
2

So are you or are you not disputing that completed suicide is a reliable indicator of unhappiness?
/r/MensRights02/01/15 03:07 PM
2

Thank you for this.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 03:03 PM
10

I don't think that's correct. I may be wrong, but I don't think you'll see kids of divorcing parents offing themselves left and right.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 01:14 PM
1

They won't do it at anything near the same rate tho.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 01:13 PM
1

I assume that you're not a woman then.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 01:12 PM
1

I knew which cities before I clicked. Unfortunately I live in one of them.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 10:15 PM
1

There's Father Christmas. But he exists to give you things.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 09:35 PM
1

I don't think Japanese family law is much like US family law.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 09:20 PM
3

And the usual ad hominem shaming tactics appear.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 09:17 PM
1

Or men (people?) lie about having girlfriends.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 08:59 PM
2

What? A clone by definition is identical to a human.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 08:53 PM
2

Women are as entitled to be pampered during pregnancy as men are during illness. I don't imagine many people think that sick men have an entitlement to pampering. I certainly don't. In fact, given the way many women routinely trivialise men's illness ("man-flu" etc.), I think that pampering is quite the opposite of what sick men generally receive.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 08:53 PM
1

Nobody "deserves" pampering.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 08:49 PM
1

Bonus: feminists will protest day and night to make it illegal once more because " their value in society is gone" when in reality they can no longer use their ability to bear children to be pampered (though those that are pregnant should be as its evident that carrying a developing human inside of you is hard.) Which is quite ironic, because artificial wombs will simply give men the reproductive freedom given women by artificial insemination and IVF.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 08:48 PM
1

You do realise that such a document couldn't be binding?
/r/MensRights01/01/15 12:31 PM
0

No. It can be a cheap rhetorical trick tho.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 12:29 PM
1

Sounds like genocide.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 05:55 AM
1

This guy wants to "reprogram" women.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 05:54 AM
1

I thought they were strong and independent and didn't need a man?
/r/MensRights01/01/15 05:51 AM
2

I'm sorry, I don't follow you at all. In your radical feminist example, you wouldn't "simply" be ignoring my feelings, you'd be ignoring the (hypothetical) published data on false allegations. My point is that "intuition" is a vague word that often covers up something wholly irrational - hunches and prejudices.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 03:18 AM
3

What is intuition other than a feeling?
/r/MensRights31/12/14 02:47 AM
1

Most male transvestites don't cross-dress publicly.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 02:26 AM
1

He says his wife is sick. He's probably being investigated for corruption.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 02:15 AM
3

IOW, it contradicts your feelings?
/r/MensRights31/12/14 02:12 AM
1

This isn't even that extreme. It's just saying that witches are less common than generally believed and that there are more false accusations of witchcraft than generally thought.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 02:11 AM
1

Why don't you think it works with police or others in authority? I've had considerable success.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 01:40 AM
-4

It's a joke about Joan Rivers ...
/r/MensRights30/12/14 06:19 AM
1

But in the presence of oestrogen, which all healthy women have, testosterone increases the female sex drive.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 05:36 AM
1

Men normally have a higher sex-drive. It's just supply and demand.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 05:35 AM
-3

It's disgusting that you think you're some kind of hero(ine) in this. Nice move divorcing the guy.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 05:26 AM
1

Australia too. Probably Canada and half the USA as well.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 05:19 AM
1

Marriage started as a purely religious arrangement and was governed by canon law. The fact that it's now more about the wife getting her claws into the husband's money is neither here nor there.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 05:17 AM
1

This is the future. The only entities with a legitimate interest in the matter are those persons getting married and religious organisations. Both should be pleased to be free of government regulation in this regard. The opposition will come from women who see marriage as a meal-ticket and from feminist organisations.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 05:16 AM
1

It might be better than giving her the satisfaction.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 05:13 AM
6

Threats of harm are not only a civil problem.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 05:05 AM
-6

Everyone knows she's a tranny ...
/r/MensRights30/12/14 05:00 AM
1

Words fail me.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 04:57 AM
1

Dictionaries aren't typically for people who already know the language. They are for people that don't know the language. That is false. Bilingual dictionaries are for that. The OED is not designed for foreigners. They are completely correct - the word "rapist" is used in English to refer to men much more often (hence, typically) than women. And the word "schoolteacher" is used more often to refer to women than to men, but you won't find a reference to sex in its definition, because it is unnece…
/r/MensRights28/12/14 12:22 AM
1

Assuming good faith until the contrary is demonstrated is reasonable. In this case, the contrary was demonstrated a long time ago.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 12:19 AM
1

You're correct. I was talking about a moral authority to "lecture", which I don't think Dershowitz has. He is still right tho.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 12:17 AM
1

They're false statistics.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 04:13 AM
1

There's a paedophile subreddit?
/r/MensRights27/12/14 04:07 AM
1

I know a brilliantly intelligent scientist, engineer and entrepreneur who is a self-made millionaire many times over. One day he was sitting in his stationary car with his son. A police car pulled up, and 4 cops dragged him out of the car and beat the hell out of him in front of his son. Why? He was a bearded man with a child. Obviously a paedophile. Here endeth the lesson.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 04:05 AM
1

They define it however is convenient in the moment.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 03:42 AM
3

What is actually meant by "teach men not to rape" is "teach men that they have a fundamental propensity to rape, which they must overcome."
/r/MensRights27/12/14 03:39 AM
1

You couldn't make this shit up.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 03:33 AM
2

If she accuses you, she will have to pick a time and place to claim it happened. No, she can say she can't remember exactly but that it was in her first year living with him and might have been spring (or something). Then the police can simply charge that between 01 January 2012 and 31 December 2012 he raped her. Happens all the time.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 03:26 AM
1

Metzitzah is not an inherent feature of circumcision.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 02:59 AM
1

And yet a female baby becomes a "girl-child".
/r/MensRights27/12/14 02:58 AM
1

No, they're too scared that if they don't submit their son to it they'll be ostracised from the haredi community for not circumcising their sons in a halachically valid way.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 02:54 AM
3

I don't think that was even their reasoning really. I think prohibition was more about spoiling other people's fun than anything else.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 01:44 AM
2

In fairness, only the first 3 sentences if your quote are about victimhood.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 02:38 PM
1

This is a man who openly and actively supports state torture. He has lost any moral authority he had on any subject.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 02:34 PM
1

Are you sure about that?
/r/MensRights26/12/14 02:28 PM
1

If a group of men had done this there would have been violence and quite possibly weapons drawn.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 02:22 PM
3

It's utterly unnecessary to specify a sex. It makes one conclude that an agenda is at work.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 02:10 PM
0

Not trying to be rude, but if you only want it 3 times a week you should get your T levels checked (and if you're a young man, they should be in the upper 20% of the reference range). Women like sex (partly) because it feels good. However, I don't think the female orgasm feels as good as the male orgasm, because women just don't seek orgasm so much. (Also, a lot of the pleasure guys get comes from the physical feeling of spurting out semen, and women don't have that.) Validation and control are …
/r/askTRP26/12/14 04:27 AM
4

If I like all pizza, and you only like the best pizza, I think that I like pizza more than you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 03:09 AM
3

This is where male solopilism comes in. Guys assume sex for us is as it is for them 100% of the time. Not true. I think they think "well it feels good, I orgasm'd. Not sure why she didn't like it. Sex is clearly the answer to all problems. Gosh." The trouble is that when men suggest that women don't like sex as much as men they're called misogynist.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 01:03 AM
2

I'm sure it helps ...
/r/MensRights25/12/14 11:46 AM
1

upper to middle class white women complaining about inconvenience under the veneer of women's issues. I'm stealing that line.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 11:44 AM
0

It's a very good suggestion, one that I expect to be taken more seriously as society becomes more looks-obsessed and medicine advances.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/14 01:57 AM
0

Wrong.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 03:30 AM
10

Why am I not surprised it's in dailylife.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 04:19 AM
5

Thank you.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 03:38 AM
1

Mandela bombed his oppressors.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 03:17 AM
4

Do you have a link to those comments?
/r/MensRights20/12/14 03:13 AM
1

It doesn't work like that. There is no way to protect yourself. That's the whole point.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 01:32 PM
2

Most people don't easily think ill of those close to them. If you think it happened, it probably did. Objectively it also sounds likely in this case.
/r/askTRP14/12/14 03:40 AM
3

Her accusation wasn't thoughtless. It was wilful and utterly selfish.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 10:19 AM
0

I'm not a "nigger". And you're inarticulate.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 02:24 AM
0

He does, really. He's have to be intellectually disabled not to understand that (if there were a relationship) he could get her into a significant amount of trouble any time he wanted.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 06:03 PM
2

Why not cooking too?
/r/MensRights01/12/14 04:55 AM
1

No, I think you'll find that a tape-recorded confession is the best evidence there is.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 04:52 AM
2

But why was it funny?
/r/MensRights01/12/14 04:50 AM
7

Sugar and spice and all things nice vs snakes and snails and puppy-dogs' tails.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 04:47 AM
20

I think it's the double-standard dude.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 04:41 AM
6

But feminism is about equality! I don't know any feminists like that! /s
/r/MensRights01/12/14 04:40 AM
1

You're a real turd.
/r/askTRP01/12/14 04:19 AM
2

Nobody's saying "distrust all females."
/r/MensRights30/11/14 09:53 PM
2

These girls are a lot more common than the Ted Bundys of this world. Just because your friend apparently wasn't bothered by being accused of rape doesn't mean /u/mad_drill won't be.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 09:07 PM
1

I'm speaking about most men, not for them. I didn't see your implication at all. Perhaps I was confused by your use of 'compliment' instead of 'complement'. (Either way, 'complementing' just means going well together.)
/r/MensRights30/11/14 06:07 PM
2

Surely you mean individual uniqueness ... /s
/r/MensRights30/11/14 05:48 PM
1

Because (a) most women wouldn't and (b) most men don't want to wear jewellery with gemstones.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 05:47 PM
1

Greed? Showing off to their friends?
/r/MensRights30/11/14 05:45 PM
1

You are scum.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 04:10 PM
2

You know she won't. She probably barely remembers it.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 04:07 PM
3

It's sad that you think this is good.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 04:05 PM
1

We don't know where he lives. It was legal for me to have sex at 15.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 04:03 PM
2

That's criminal justice for you.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 12:05 PM
1

thats what happens when you Dont treat a woman how she is suppose to be treated.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 11:04 AM
1

Oh my God.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 10:59 AM
1

I read the book as a consequence. While my ex wasn't following it to the letter, she was cherry-picking the bits that suited her personal attitude. I thought it was very ironic at the time, and I called her an adapted 3-word phrase beginning with the definite article and having the prefix un- in the penultimate word.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 06:44 PM
1

Oh yeah. Fake tits seem to age a lot better. They almost never sag. Today, a breast implant operation is such a routine, low-risk, short-recovery, simple, quick, predictable, effective, and reliable procedure that there are few downsides to fake tits. (If one regarded the matter purely economically, it would be interesting to calculate whether/how the size of a woman's augmented breasts affected her success in business.) I would say that 70%+ of the female population would benefit from enhanceme…
/r/askTRP21/11/14 06:35 PM
2

Call me weird, but I prefer fake tits to real ones.
/r/askTRP20/11/14 02:17 PM
1

/u/Quatroking referred specifically to IT.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 02:06 PM
2

No, they haven't.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 06:35 AM
1

He probably does despise women NOW ...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 06:35 AM
2

I had the same experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 06:33 AM
1

The problem arises when one is playing lying and the other isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 06:23 AM
1

This is an example of the attitudes OP was complaining about, which do many in this thread say doesn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 06:22 AM
2

Why not? Happened to me too.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 06:12 AM
4

Not as stupid as connecting TRP with David Icke.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 06:09 AM
1

My ex-girlfriend justified her cheating with (among other things) polyamory and The Ethical Slut.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 06:06 AM
3

The critics seem to have been telling him that being upset about her cheating was "trying to control a woman's sexuality" or something similar. Also, about half of the population cheats.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 06:04 AM
1

/u/Shirrapikachu said "real" feminists weren't like that. That's exactly what No True Scotsman is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 05:58 AM
1

Dude, your girlfriend is unfaithful.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 05:54 AM
1

I got none, and many (most?) of our female mutual friends supported the cheating, both by enabling it and condoning it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 05:39 AM
2

So stop dating hot, "independent" women and settle down with the vicar's virginal daughter?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 05:36 AM
1

Half the population does.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 05:34 AM
-1

Or most girls are like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 05:31 AM
0

I was talking about IT. They don't build bridges.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 05:11 AM
1

And if people care about it more, they do it more.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 04:44 AM
1

He looks just like the ones I know.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 04:42 AM
7

Most of the ones I know are total slackers.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 04:37 AM
6

No, they don't. They regard your assertion as proof that you don't get how hard it is.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 04:33 AM
1

I doubt he wept about his work.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 04:31 AM
1

The issue has never come before a court, to the best of my knowledge. But there is no medical excuse here. The only think that could legitimise it is the judge's order. Did the judge have jurisdiction to make such an order? Not by way of a "search warrant." it is legal to photograph the erect penis of a minor in such a case. Citation please. I'm still waiting.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 08:35 AM
1

It's not subjective. The question is, 'Would a reasonable person looking at this photo regard it as sexual?' it is legal to photograph the erect penis of a minor in such a case. Citation please. You're talking to a lawyer.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 01:03 PM
1

Well, now you've seen it.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 12:52 PM
1

It's a question of how three picture looks, nothing else. An erect penis looks sexual.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 12:17 PM
2

A good quote is a good quote.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 12:15 PM
1

So we're ruled by blacks, indigenous people, homosexuals and women?
/r/MensRights18/11/14 12:11 PM
1

I don't see how a search warrant could authorise what this cop sought.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 12:07 PM
1

Once you force an erection it's no longer something silly and non-sexual.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 12:06 PM
1

Except the doctor owes no duty of confidentiality to the mother ...
/r/MensRights18/11/14 11:59 AM
1

I've been saying it for years.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 11:50 AM
1

Britain is a police state.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 11:35 AM
1

The most startling thing is that it doesn't just excuse her, it says that he should be imprisoned.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 04:15 AM
1

Fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 04:50 PM
1

But you think you should be paid simply for undergoing childbirth.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 07:46 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter