TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

calmyourcrabcakes Archive

View 0 posts and 380 comments by calmyourcrabcakes on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

How is me focusing my vitriol towards the ~1,000 perpatrators and not 62 million people "Downplaying" Because your entire point was that the group is extremely small and that you're unlikely to ever come across one of them. That's a very textbook example of downplaying. What did you say that you'd consider vitriolic? It's not always a man. In fact, When you Look up DV and Sexual Assault statistics, they're not drastically different, in many cases, women are actually leading negative categories. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/26 06:58 PM
0

You won't change my opinion. I'm not trying to, you're just incorrect and I explained why.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 04:27 PM
1

Woke meaning is not opposite for now. Socially conscious is different from aware of injustice, but it's not opposite. NO ONE uses it this way today. Literally no one in any media uses woke with it's original meaning or in a positive way at all. What are you talking about?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/26 06:24 AM
1

Sadly most of time it has been used, women have specifically told that it does not mean it anymore. Do you have anything backing up that it this happens "most of the time" ? "word has changed" is most common explanation. While that's true, that doesn't change that the definition still exists. Woke on the other hand has the opposite meaning now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/26 07:13 PM
1

This isn't about me "I for one am a bit fed up of men getting told to approach women" Well that's interesting. Women would have to reject fewer annoying unattractive men. What evidence do you have that annoying unattractive men would approach less if women approached more?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/26 07:10 PM
-1

Incel has lost it. No it hasn't. The definition of incel is still someone who's involuntarily celibate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 05:34 PM
-1

Mistake and failure are not synonymous. I didn't say they were. Just to be clear, I wanted to avoid the element of entitlement with you, because I knew you weren't engaging in good faith. Why have I said that you think I'm being disingenuous about? Oh please, that was an obvious dog whistle. Why would you want to focus entirely on the lowest common denominator when it is obvious they aren't representative of the entire group. Maybe because they're a strawman that's easier to attack? So I made th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 05:32 PM
-1

The words are synonymous with each other. If "worthy" is good enough for the conversation then "deserving" should not be construed as encroaching on someone's autonomy either. No shit they're synonyms but there's a difference in framing. It's like the difference in mistake vs failure. You specifically said you wanted to avoid the element of entitlement, well I'm telling you one way you can do that is to use worthy instead of deserve. This is a conversation about context and nuance among people, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 08:17 AM
-2

I am defining "deserve" as a measure of inherent human worthiness, not as an entitlement to another person's autonomy. Then you're misusing that word, and specificizing it as being "worthy" of love instead of "deserving" would fit the point you're trying to make more. It conflates the "desire for a connection" with "demanding sex" specifically to shut down empathy. This is often because those are the types of conversations/spaces that incels are creating and repeating. There are definitely a num…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/26 11:52 PM
-1

imagine making up a scenario to win an imaginary argument. Your comment was really dumb, is what I'm saying.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/26 09:10 PM
1

Its meaning has been widened into nothingness. Not widened, it's been completely flipped to mean the opposite. A similar example but in reverse would be "stan" which was originally negative, and is now used to self describe. But 'racial injustice' was not removed from it. It's still there. You think the people who use woke in it's modern context believe that there is racial injustice happening? For incels, "involuntary celibate" is totally removed. This is a much better example of a word that's …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/26 09:06 PM
-2

it also implies that this particular person doesn't deserve having such a connection. Define what "deserve" means to you in this context. Incel-targeted rhetoric almost never focuses on the lack of a meaningful connection Hard disagree. Most well intentioned incel advice boils down to therapy, self improvement through self love and making connections in real life with friends.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/26 08:25 PM
2

Yes true, but it did not lose its core defining principle like incel did. I'm really curious to see your explanation for how a word used by black political groups as far back as the 1920s to warn people of racial injustice didn't lose it's core defining principle when it started being applied to tv shows and movies casting minorities?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/26 07:15 PM
1

Perhaps it is, but that's the data we have, which women consume ~40% of pornographic materials. This is what I'm talking about though. Pornographic materials includes still images, text, etc. If you limit it to just video the percentage of women can drop below 20% depending on region and other factors. There's also studies showing women's most searched/consumed categories are violent porn(bdsm) and Faux Incest. Do you have a link to any of those studies? it's statistically impossible to think th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/26 04:18 PM
1

Do you want to mention why you disagree? I think you're looking at this from a perspective of what would be easiest for YOU instead of being objective about how people interact. What your asking for wouldn't actually fix anything for you. Like what do you think would fundamentally change for you if women approached men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/26 04:01 PM
1

Wow!!! Source? Citation?!?! You can't just state that as objective truth! Up until now I had assumed it was just your opinion, but you didn't preface it with 'in my opinion, which may not be objectively true,' so now I'm going to make a big deal out of it! The difference is that my opinion is based on actual evidence and yours is based on some people you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 11:55 PM
1

Right, and it's unwarranted as you're the one who is failing to make any coherent point My point was pretty obviously coherent considering you made several responses to it lol or explain what I've supposedly misunderstood. I don't know why you need this explained to you? You're making a definitive claim on potential benefits. "there are no benefits to exercise because everyone I know who tried got fatter" I simply disagreed that there are benefits No, you said the people who experienced benefits…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 11:41 PM
1

I feel no embarrassment. I was expressing embarrassment for you. You should explain yourself better if the plain reading of not thinking I'm in a position to make judgements of people who I am familiar with and am similar to wasn't your intended meaning. I was talking about my original comment. I never said that MGTOW will always work and is perfect and guaranteed. I said there were potential benefits, you misunderstood and spazzed out and now here we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 11:18 PM
1

You'll never see someone as prominent as Ana risk taking on someone who's actually sincere and capable of handling the debate. Who would you suggest she debate on this topic?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 11:00 PM
1

Do you have any specific examples of this happening on those subs?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 10:54 PM
1

I've tried it myself and been around such people and know that it doesn't really work, they're all angry and bitter and sad about their situation and desperate Oh that's embarrassing. You completely misunderstood my comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 10:45 PM
1

You're not in a position of any authority or experience to make that claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 10:15 PM
0

So, of those 5 million unique users in february ~2 million were women, 3 million were men. It's pretty dishonest to take the gender breakdown for a mainstream and well known site like pornhub and apply it to motherless. To put that in further perspective, you have a 1 in 138,000 chance to be struck by lightning. You are more likely to be struck by lightning 19.5 times, than come across someone who was an active participant in the "Rape Academy What point do you think you're making?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 10:03 PM
1

Okay then start a charity for them or something. I was just explaining the benefits.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 09:21 PM
1

These guys actively give up on relationships with women. Yeah I thought that was pretty clear by the whole "going their own way" part. And I firmly believe Cool. That's irrelevant though.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 09:08 PM
1

My elementary school teacher told us girls were smarter than boys. Guess what she identified as? Your imagination?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 08:57 PM
1

How would MGTOW even conceptually be 'healthy' Focusing on your own mental/physical health and declining to chase the "ideal" of marriage and family would genuinely make a massive improvement to many men's (and women) lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 08:56 PM
4

The Democrats lost what most people thought was a sure thing This is extremely revisionist. Hilary was a shocking upset yes, but democrats were very pessimistic about their chances in '24 due to biden changing his mind about running again and then performing so terribly followed by kamala's inability to get any real excitement for her campaign going.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 08:30 PM
1

All you have to do is look at reddit, in which toxic feminist abuse of men goes completely unchecked. Entering those subs and trying to make a rational argument, is basically asking for a punishment beating. You consider this equivalent to the complaints people have about the manosphere? the people really hurt by the toxic womanosphere are women themselves. They become bitter and twisted My dude.... cmon lol. Have you been to any red pill/manosphere spaces?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 07:28 PM
1

I don’t know why we don’t simply define rape as forced physical interaction with the perpetrator’s genitals. Few questions. Who is "we"? Why do the genitals have to be involved? Also are you comfortable with the possibility that your new definition would massively increase the stats of rape on both sides, but overwhelmingly from men towards women? Debating the definition of rape is just rape apologia. Then you disagree with the original paper and most state laws on the subject. Differentiating “…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 06:45 PM
1

Anecdotal isnt evidence It's literally called "anecdotal evidence" lol downplaying Carpenter's sexism What are you referring to?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 06:21 PM
1

Not all of them, but it's a lot of casual misandry being thrown about like 'kill all men', and 'all men are trash' There's nothing casual about either of those statements. It's exactly the same as how racist white folks used to talk about black people. Used to?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 05:50 PM
1

Agreed, I'm also fed up with going to work when I think work should just come to me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 05:48 PM
1

That in a nutshell basically you admitting that a guy has to AUTOMATICALLY bring far more to the table than average I don't see how it proves that at all? and most guys just don't even register as someone you'd date. This would be also be true in reverse if men were more introspective or honest about what they want in a partner. Guys don't place enough important on incompatibilities they have with women they date and focus on what they like instead because they treat relationships like a require…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 07:43 PM
3

Savanna Stone gets called a pick-me online all day, everyday. But she's not being called that for "simply not wanting to participate in hating men openly"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 09:59 PM
2

You're missing the performative aspect of it. Simps aren't the male analog to pick me's, fake feminist males are.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 09:53 PM
7

This argument would be a lot stronger if you weren't using it on a comment mentioning pearl.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 09:49 PM
1

I meant that it's an extremely expected comment, that's why it's a comment one could expect here. I don't understand what's not clear about that. I'm pretty sure it's a comment you could expect anywhere so that's what threw me off. I mean, you could have that silly argument about the fame of a person who isn't a singer and isn't supposed to fill an arena solo I think it's an extremely valid point that klay's fame is contextually tied to the warriors and the nba. Without it he falls off pretty ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:47 PM
1

So men lie. Glad we could clear this up.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:41 PM
2

Exactly the comment one could expect here I have no idea what this means Btw, it's a knock against her "GLOBAL POP STAR" case. Okay. It's still a weak point for the reason I explained.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:37 PM
1

I know how men are. We don't lie. So do I. We do.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:34 PM
3

She could barely fill an arena in her EU tour locations. Three concerts in europe were canceled because of low ticket sales. I don't think this is much of a knock against her since klay would struggle to sell out a stadium, let alone arena if he was just showing up by himself.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:23 PM
1

You're trying way too hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:10 PM
1

I am a man, so I would know. That doesn't make sense. If you haven't dated men, then how would you know they don't lie in relationships? Trying to argue with a man about mens experiences Aren't you arguing about women's experiences?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:04 PM
2

Sigh, time to explain economics to a woman. 🙄 The concept of value is completely independent of economics so this doesn't make sense. That’s LITERALLY the definition of value. That's the definition of economic value. Obviously something can be high value without being high in cost so the monetary aspect isn't required. The market determines what’s high or low value, not you. You're talking about supply and demand, not value.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:01 PM
1

Do you date men?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 08:41 PM
2

There are people who are surprised and people who aren't. If you are in the latter category maybe get some insight on this from those who aren't. You mean there are people making videos where they "called it" to get some extra views because they're not interesting enough to tune in otherwise. It's like repentant Trump supporters who couldn't see any of this coming. Maybe its a good idea to listen to the people who could just for the sake understanding. Why do you think I'm shocked or confused ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 04:03 AM
7

He can find dozens of women that look better than Megs at any local mall. Or really anywhere where there are women who are not old as fuck. She is so ugly. My dude. You spend your free time creating ai porn, your brain is actually cooked when it comes to women's attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 03:56 AM
1

Just listen to these guys talk about it. Why? Everyone you listed are beyond irrelevant when it comes to entertainment.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 03:35 AM
3

Is english your first language? I don't see how else you could misunderstand what people are saying so badly. They were not talking about a real life situation that has opposing viewpoints. They're specifically telling you the person is lying. "He was late to work because of a car accident" You: Or because he woke up late "No it's because of the car accident" You: But it might be because he woke up late
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 06:37 PM
2

No, they're talking about a situation when they think the guy is lying cause he had sex and then didn't enter a LTR "If they say they are looking for an LTR but they actually want casual" This is called a lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 06:27 PM
5

How it doesnt apply ? Because they're specifically talking about a situation in which the guy is lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 05:48 PM
15

Then he's not lying about wanting an LTR and it doesn't apply to this. This really isn't that difficult.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 04:00 PM
13

What are you basing that on?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 04:47 PM
4

Women like to say they wear makeup for themselves but this is cope. Women can absolutely put on makeup but they won’t get the same results as when they put it on Doing it for themselves isn’t the same as saying they do it for men. Women will put on makeup even if they’re just hanging out with other women they’re friends with.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 04:42 PM
7

But they can’t handle with the shoe is on the other foot now You think women are upset men don’t want to date them? What are you basing this on?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 06:02 PM
2

You mean the way women constantly denigrate short, bald, or broke men? Men also constantly denigrate short, bald, or broke men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 10:00 PM
2

Did you really miss the whole era when people were pushing back on the fashion/magazine industry for beauty standards? You must have lived under a rock during the 90s-00s. You mean the time models and actresses were taking drugs, starving themselves and using eating disorders to be unnaturally skinny? lol Pushback against that is what made you believe you couldn't say you like big boobs? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 09:55 PM
-3

So, why should we think about it from a woman's perspective? Because you're judging her for the way she's thinking lol
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 09:47 PM
1

I already did. Maybe I missed it, when did you disprove me when I said you were lying about this? "You never specified "combat arms", not until long after I mentioned it." I just remembered that you were part of the "calling heterosexually men gay as an insult is not a homophobic slur" crowd. Not accurate, but we've already established that's pretty much your whole thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 11:57 PM
1

It would be so easy to disprove anything I said. It would literally take 5 seconds. There's a reason you're pretending like you don't care anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 11:03 PM
1

This is the most pathetic attempt at grasping straws I've seen in quite a while. How is it more pathetic than needing to lie about shit someone said to try and win a debate on reddit? lol Please accept my apologies that I assumed that you were wrong You can blame the first time you mentioned it on assuming, after I corrected you and asked 3 separate times for you to back it up. It becomes pretty obvious that you were lying. on 3 counts instead of only 2. I literally just pointed out that you lie…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 10:30 PM
1

You didn't specify combat roles when you went off on people. I don't think saying "still wrong" counts as going off on people but maybe you're more sensitive about that kind of stuff. Either way, I'll take this as you admitting you were wrong when you said "You never specified "combat arms", not until long after I mentioned it." When people are talking about military fitness standards, they are talking about the fitness standards of the entire military. That must be why they only bring up issues…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 09:00 PM
1

You know how many women are in combat roles in the military? 2% out of all the women in the military. Cool. you didn't even mention combat roles when you initially went off on people about how wrong they were. I'm guessing you realized I was also right about specifying combat roles in my comment to you which is why desperately pivoting to this. Even accounting for the fact that you were 98% wrong When people talk about the military fitness standards, they're not talking about office workers and …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 08:43 PM
1

I saw you do it in real time 2 or 3 separate times. You replied to me and then deleted it. I literally saw you do it. Why do you even bother with this bullshit? If I deleted any comments there would be spots in the thread where it says DELETED. You either don't understand how reddit works or you're lying. Sure thing. Translation: You're right Bullshit That's some compelling evidence. You clearly thought this out and did your research. Starting here with your first reply to me I told you your lin…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 04:26 PM
0

Says the guy who keeps deleting his comments. I haven't deleted any of my comments. You kept claiming to anyone who listened that "the standards are the same". This is an incredibly weird way to describe two single comments I made to one person that almost literally said "That's not correct" You never specified "combat arms", not until long after I mentioned it. My specification of the changes being to combat arms was in my 2nd reply to you and came BEFORE you said anything about it. What are yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 07:15 AM
0

I was the one who explained that to you. Oh yikes. These are direct quotes from the second comment I responded to you with. I'm not sure how you explained something I had already stated in my comment before your reply. "The Physical Fitness Test (PFT) will now use sex-neutral scoring for Marines in combat arms Primary Military Occupational Specialties." "The guidance emphasizes gender-neutral requirements for combat positions and stricter overall fitness expectations." "Why is the Army moving to…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 09:29 AM
0

It was literally on the same article you linked. Do you think that changes the date something gets published? Here is the one from the actial marines website. Notice how there are separate standards for men and women. That is the official government website. This is genuinely embarrassing. There is a standard physical fitness test that they use for all members regardless of combat role. The PFT is non combat and has different requirements for women which is why it's listed there. Did you not not…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 05:00 AM
0

I'm Norwegian My condolences. Here's the same from the German military if that is more important It's not. The military standards for combat roles in the US is the same for men and women. Either refute that or let it go.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 01:10 AM
1

The scoring system is gender neutral for combat roles Correct. The requirements are still different for men and women based on age and sex. No they aren't. You just don't understand how the scoring system works. https://taskandpurpose.com/news/marines-gender-neutral-pft/ "the new rules will nearly double the pull-up requirements and subtract three minutes from allowed run times for women" "In pull-ups, men in their 20s or early 30s score 100 points if they complete 23 reps. Women currently get t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 01:07 AM
1

lmao you're not actually counting norway as a real military are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 11:58 PM
0

[https://www.army.mil/aft/](The Army Fitness Test AFT will become the official physical fitness test of record for all Soldiers on June 1, 2025, replacing the Army Combat Fitness Test.) [https://www.army.mil/aft/#faq](Why is the Army moving to a sex-neutral scoring standard for combat MOSs? Higher fitness standards are strictly aligned with the unique physical demands of specific roles, maintaining readiness, and mission effectiveness.) [https://www.army.mil/aft/#faq](What do you mean by sex-neu…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 11:52 PM
1

"This is not a conversation centered on philosophy"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 11:38 PM
1

What does an article from norway have to do with this?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 11:38 PM
1

Yes, it's a preference. You never touched a book about philosophy. This is not a conversation centered on philosophy. We're not discussing concepts. Your preference for not getting wet. Getting wet or staying dry are not something you can decide between logically. Your own quote that YOU provided states that logic is based on conclusions that follow premises based on the argument. It doesn't matter if I start from a preference as long as the structure of the argument holds. Ah never mind, this c…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:30 PM
1

I mean, literally yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:25 PM
0

What leads people like you to tell people they are wrong when you know perfectly well that you don't know what you are talking about? I think that's something you should have asked yourself before linking an article that's over a year old and using out dated information.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:25 PM
1

and military then. Still wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 06:41 AM
3

It does actually, preferences are illogical. They're founded on emotion. It's not an emotion to "prefer" feeding yourself when you're hungry. You're confusing objective with illogical. It can be non-logical to want to eat food that's bad for you but it's not illogical. examines how conclusions follow from premises based on the structure of arguments alone What part of this counters my umbrella example? That quote actually undermines the point you're making. Based on the argument alone, my conclu…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 11:11 PM
1

Likewise with firefighters. This isn't true.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 10:53 PM
2

Safety is not logical, it's a preference Something being a preference doesn't mean it's illogical. You're using a completely different context from what everyone is talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 10:22 PM
7

This is a preference. Preferences are not logical. It's not a preference to want to avoid getting sick or sitting around in wet clothes. In some places, it's necessary for safety. Any action must be founded on a preference, which is illogical. That's a philosophical concept, not an objective fact lol Something can be logical AND a preference. That's not a contradiction. As Hume wrote I don't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 08:40 PM
3

No I just dismissed their comment out of hand You didn't dismiss their comment, you tried to directly reply to it with a counter point lol They made a specific claim and you responded with an anecdote about something completely different.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 07:32 PM
8

There is never a logically coherent reason to do anything. ...what? lol It's raining outside If I go out in the rain I will get wet unless I take an umbrella I don't want to get wet Therefore I should take an umbrella when I go outside Please explain how that's NOT a logically coherent reason to do something.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 07:28 PM
0

You didn't actually counter anything they said lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 06:51 PM
14

It's not that red pill creators are or aren't toxic, It's that their negative interactions with a subset of women causes them to look for an alternate theory/method to date There are people who have never had a negative interaction with minorities yet still consume racist content and hate minorities. It's not always a reaction. Sometimes it's learned behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 06:49 PM
1

Let's assume I am. The question of "WHY x is an issue" is different. Literally yes, but you understand it's still the same topic right? lol Why? Because I think it's important to fully understand your position if I'm going to debate it. And why do you want to discuss the question of why? Explained above.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 03:35 PM
3

If I say "X is true" and you ask "WHY are you making an issue out of X," it's a different topic. You're not saying "X is true", you're saying "X is an issue". Asking why is completely valid and on topic. Just focus on the claim being made. You're making this extraordinarily narrow for a debate. Do you, or do you not agree that generally speaking in the West there is a taboo against making statements which are unflattering to women as a group? Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 08:45 PM
3

If you want to concede my point and discuss a different topic, please first tell me why and I will consider it. ? I'm literally discussing your topic. I'm asking WHY this is an issue. If you can't articulate why this is an issue, how am I supposed to engage with it?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 06:43 PM
4

I should have said "issue" not "problem" I do think it's a problem, but that's beyond the scope of my post. Let me be more direct, why is that an issue I should care about for you? If this were a more general discussion board, I would point out that there are other groups for which there are similar taboos. But here, you bring up those other groups, your post gets deleted. So is your issue that it's taboo to generalize minority groups vs majority ones?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 06:20 PM
1

The problem is not that people argue back, rather, the problem is that people impose negative social repercussions. Why is that a problem? I am simply pointing out that there is a taboo against saying anything which is unflattering to women as a group. There's multiple groups that you can say that about. Why are you singling out women?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 05:31 PM
1

ok cool
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 10:21 PM
0

You’re assuming that for no reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 08:18 AM
1

I don’t care
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 08:17 AM
0

This thread alone proves you wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 10:40 PM
-2

No it doesn't. They're not suggesting the man change his sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 10:38 PM
0

I know, it’s a really weird thing to do
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 08:54 PM
0

I know you made that up lol
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 08:50 PM
-4

This 100% didn’t happen lol
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 08:48 PM
-5

Suggesting a guy try dating other men isn’t a homophobic insult
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 08:47 PM
1

changing the perspective does not change the reality I'm saying I don't think you have an accurate view of reality. you don't seem to have the ability to interprert, but take things literally You think my exaggerated comparison of dating to feudal lords is an example of someone taking something too literally? lol of course I envy them, when they get to have desirable bodies and men don't Yeah like I said you seem REALLY focused on a very specific aspect of this that isn't normal. I really don't …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 11:54 PM
1

What do you think the reality of the sexual world is?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 11:48 PM
2

can you give me a couple examples of movies which (1) primarily cater to male fantasies and desires; and (2) the protagonist's female love interest is NOT a "plot device" as you put it? Edge of Tomorrow, Groundhog day, the Before Sunrise series, High Fidelity, Lost in Translation, True Lies, Mr. and Mrs. Smith.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 10:05 PM
–

it doeset matter what my perspective is How would you know? Have you tried having a different one? the fact is that men are far less worth sexually than women, men are less desirable, they are less valuable overall Even if that were true, we're not talking about a serf class and fuedal lords. We're talking at most about general differences between each other's experiences. People aren't throwing trash at you on the street. some men don't have issues with being the inferior, less desired party, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 09:53 PM
1

I didn’t say the list is inerrant. By your logic the list should be topped by landlord, business owner, investor, etc. What specifically makes you think that? Except the landlord/business owner/investor could cut themselves a salary if they want. They can do whatever they want. It still won't make it a job in the traditional sense. Equity is literally a conceptual claim on future value. What does that have to do with executives belonging on the list or not? I’m not saying their money is 'fake' o…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 09:34 PM
–

It's not a line, you have some really serious issues on display in your posts. The dynamics don't need to be changed, your perspective does.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 08:11 PM
–

Your post history is extremely concerning dude. You should think about getting some professional help.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 07:00 PM
1

I didn’t say the list is inerrant. By your logic the list should be topped by landlord, business owner, investor, etc. No, that wouldn't make sense because none of those people receive a salary. An executive does. Why would discussing equity as a concept not fit within this context? Because we were talking about executives on the list of high paying jobs, not concepts lol You were essentially saying they don't count because their money is "gambling" Saying doctors are among the most highly value…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 06:58 PM
1

From the perspective of feminists, this is a problem. Everything is supposed to be about women, all the time. Ugh, you were so close. The issue with the trope has nothing to do with men's needs or desires, it's the act of reducing the female character to a plot device in order to fulfill them. You don't NEED the manic pixie character for any story that serves as a male fantasy and it's inclusion can often make the overall story weaker.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 05:56 PM
1

“You just want some non-threatening but exciting woman who sweeps you up while you do nothing” I don't know where you got this from but that's not the problem people have with manic pixie girls in media. Women are never judged for their arrested development like we are so they don’t see the projection here. The "manic pixie" aesthetic/trope doesn't have anything to do with arrested development.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 05:40 PM
1

The list tracks professions/careers defined by specialized skill and labor. That must be why chief executive is #11 on the list huh? A surgeon is a profession whereas “le equity holder” is a financial status. You're completely changing the context. We were talking about executives being paid in equity. Not equity as a concept. Like this is such an incredibly goofy argument. among those who work for a living, doctors are among the most highly valued because their skill is essential and scarce. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 04:50 PM
1

So because the list doesn’t include hedge fund managers and CEOs, the list is incomplete? When it's being used as evidence that the highest paid jobs are healthcare/doctor related? Yes. The list discusses professions, not equity holders. In your own words, what difference do you think that makes? Whether it’s called "equity" or "gambling," that value can only exist because the company operates in a stable environment. Those are two completely different words with two completely different meaning…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 11:55 PM
1

Doctors are highly paid. Just because there are higher earning individuals does not mean doctors are not highly paid. Good lord this is embarrassing for you. I never said doctors weren't highly paid. You brought up a list of doctors being the highest paid jobs as evidence of usefulness determining pay. I explained that the list was misleading because of how pay is calculated which would not make doctors the highest paying profession. It’s a non-sequitur to bring up high net worth-stock-market-ga…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 08:51 PM
1

Who do you think actually produces more value in terms of usefulness to society? This was your original comment that started this comment chain. No, that was YOUR comment lol If you can’t connect what I said to that question I can't connect what you said as a reply to me correcting your misleading point about doctors being highly paid.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 07:26 PM
1

You’re the one who asked me whether I’m for or against America. No I didn't lol True, but they rely on individuals who were raised in healthy, virtuous families. Without them, there are no inventors, programmers, and engineers. A nation is a family. Destroy the family, and you destroy the nation. Every country that was once prosperous but has abandoned the family is on borrowed time. My god man what the fuck are you talking about? What does any of this have to do with pay? This conversation is g…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 05:29 PM
3

yes I agree that women broadly don’t want or like me Can’t imagine why
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 08:06 AM
1

America could easily pull this off, but it’s like this by design. The bread and circus is too good for any meaningful change to come. Okay, but I don't think this is really relevant to anything we're talking about then. A list of the highest paying professions in the US are overwhelmingly from medical field. These are highly valuable and useful skills for a society. That's largely because the actual highest earners aren't paid wages, they make their money through stock options and equity. Even s…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 11:55 PM
1

People who want to build a stable and prosperous nation? I'm not sure if you're arguing for or against america here. It might not be directly correlated, but there are strong overlaps. Strong overlaps like what? Correct, and that’s not a good thing. So then you agree with my original point that value to society has nothing to do with pay?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 06:47 PM
3

By your logic misandry has never existed and racism ended when the civil rights act was passed.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 06:23 PM
5

Who do you think actually produces more value in terms of usefulness to society? Who cares? Pay isn't based on value or usefulness to society. EMT's and firemen's usefulness is incalculable, but they're basically middle class.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 06:11 PM
1

Its both condescending and useless to me. I am aggressive in how I prosecute an argument, but I am not "raging." Being condescending and "useless" doesn't mean I'm pretending. and that's a matter of opinion, I'd say dozens of aggressive comments definitely constitutes raging. I am doing this because I am a true believer, because I feel ethically compelled to take the "fight" to people like this, and its a useful exercise for me because I need to be able to argue to malicious ideologues like this…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 03:31 PM
1

Pretending to give a shit about my mental health, its overt condescension. Why do you think I'm pretending? I genuinely don't think it's healthy to rage in reddit for an entire sunday. There's nothing weird about my opinion that. You clearly don't care about the flair, looks like a shitty pun, so your material sucks. lmao ??? And you don't appear to care about the topic at all. Hence, why I think you're a troll. I think the topic is way past due and you shouldn't be getting so upset about it, so…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 10:14 PM
1

Not my problem. It is if your goal is to have a conversation and be understood by people. At some point though the frustration just becomes too much and it's easier to just ghost at that point. You know what I mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 10:09 PM
0

its something I am compelled to do. That's really weird. If you're not a sockpuppet, you're either a troll or you're here at the behest of someone else. I asked a really simple and easy question. Tell me what I said that was done in bad faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:58 PM
0

"LOL bro, you did this for 12 hrs, this is so unhealthy, so I am going to get sucked into a meaningless back & forth LMAO." Again, this doesn't make any sense to what I said lol Like what point are you trying to make here? That my 5 comments are equivalent to you wasting an entire day?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:55 PM
1

What you deem to be "mentally healthy" is completely worthless to me That's not surprising. It still doesn't change the fact that it's good advice for you. You're still not engaging in good faith Please quote a single thing I've said that you believe was done so in bad faith. I once was on a thread for over a week, I can keep going as long as it takes. This isn't something you should be bragging about dude lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:41 PM
0

You haven't changed my position on anything, your lackadaisical affectation is undercut by your continually responses. Is this a language barrier issue? I genuinely have trouble understanding the way you respond in conversations to what I'm saying. I could keep saying "I don't care," but you're obviously not paying attention. Then stop responding?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 09:39 PM
0

It was patently obvious you're not going to engage in good faith I've meant everything I've said to you, no idea why you'd think otherwise. so I am treating it as an exercise in discerning the "mens rea" element behind your "behavior." Still not using mens rea correctly. So far you're falling into the flaccid category of debaters, you obviously are incapable of contributing anything substantive, so you make sophomoric attempts at rage baiting. Even if this was true, it still wouldn't make spazzi…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:54 PM
0

Why would I listen to some bystander? Because it's good advice lol It's like someone telling you that it's not a good idea to drink gasoline and your first instinct is "fuck that I'll do what I want" Right, and you just interjected out of nowhere for no reason. If you agree with what I said, why did you ask "who cares about my comment history?" The mens rea element. You're just reinforcing that the other side has nothing substantial to say, and reinforcing the impression that those advocating fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:38 PM
0

I am well aware, your condescension was as transparent as your comments were vacuous. If you're continually "puzzled" by the reactions to the meme I'm confused by your responses because they don't seem to relate to anything we're actually talking about. It's like you're having a completely separate conversation. I still think you're a sock puppet. and that still doesn't make sense lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:26 PM
0

Neither does your comment, it doesn't contribute anything to the debate, and I don't see why I would care about some rando's irrelevant opinions. That has nothing to do with whether or not it makes sense. Like genuinely what part of my comment was confusing? Do you have anything useful to say I promise the advice I gave would be very useful for you. Who cares about my comment history? What? You asked how I knew you had been arguing for 12 hours. Your comment history shows you in this thread resp…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 07:13 PM
0

Do you usually find it acceptable to condescend to strangers? Yes. Are you going to pretend you don't? Do you think that this may be why men don't respond in ways that you like? I'm not sure what this means? Why do you think men respond in ways I don't like? You know its funny, the more people double-down on disrespecting men in general, the more energy I have. It's better than coffee. I didn't suggest a nap because I thought you were tired lol It's because you seemed extremely emotional and ups…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:57 PM
0

That's not an argument. Thanks for the condescending ad hom though. Not an ad hom and who said it was meant to be an argument? Its strange, I don't remember talking to you before so how would you know whether I was arguing for 'x' hours? The comments on your account on this post that started 12 hours earlier and kept going consistently every 5 minutes or so. Only post I have seen you make to this subreddit thread was 6 minutes ago, so I am going with sockpuppet account. This literally doesn't ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:34 PM
1

You’ve literally been raging about this in this thread for 12 hours straight at this point dude. You need to take a break. Drink some water and take a nap or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 07:20 AM
0

Because it's a sign of narcissism which does overlap with anti-social behavior. Absolutely nothing about that sentence indicated narcissism lol What he's trying to say is that those men that hog all the attention, often care little about the collective, they often think about their own gain only. They don't care if they are making other people uncomfortable, specially men, because they are the competition. OP seems to be the only one uncomfortable with it though. Isn't it more likely it's his is…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 03:52 PM
1

I'm not using it that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 03:25 PM
-2

If you walk into a room and act like a complete douchebag and start hogging attention, you will get rewarded for it while the respectful guy will get overlooked. What we are saying is that it's stupid. Women go for the exciting guy who dominates social situations and then act surprised when that guy starts exhibiting the same antisocial behaviors You're contradicting yourself. If the group rewards the guy who is exciting and dominating social situations, then he's not exhibiting antisocial behav…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 05:26 PM
–

Is it possible that the reason for this is that you find dudes more attractive than women?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 12:58 AM
–

What the fuck is "decent facial structure" ?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 12:52 AM
3

I know this is a fake story but Your friend had 3 conversations with her and didn’t ask her out. He didn’t lose her to some athlete because he never gave her a chance to pick him.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 09:38 AM
2

They tell you they're hanging out with some friends come to find out there was a boy there and then they get mad at you and say why are you mad I told you I was hanging out with friends Are you dating people in high school?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 10:18 PM
1

Was temporarily banned for calling out misandry. Was that the reason the mods gave? It looks like accountability has flown out the window Accountability for what? Yes, a mistake was made. His intention was to orgasm. He tried to orgasm during sex, and he failed to orgasm. Failing to do something you are trying to do is literally a mistake. A mistake is based on judgement, failure is based on results. They're not related. You can do everything correctly and still fail, like setting a goal of runn…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 10:49 PM
1

That’s not attraction. It’s desperation.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 05:28 AM
1

Yes, I think there are more women who vehemently do not give a shit about men than who make a point of advocating for policy that would help them That might be true, though I’m not sure how you would even measure that. It’s not relevant to my point though, I’m talking about a specific claim you made, not whether there are more or less women who advocate for men. Each time I’ve said this you change your argument to something more vague and easily defendable. It’s not something that’s put to the q…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 09:12 AM
4

Women having a strong opinion on any of these things are incredibly niche. That's not really relevant, I'm talking about your claim that one is more common than the other. I do think this is true. But I'm comparing two marginal opinions that aren't on the radar for most people. How many threads on this sub do you think you would need to go through before you found a woman saying we need a war to get rid of excess men? and how many threads would it take before you found one where a woman is again…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 11:11 PM
8

Then it would be his fault since its largely his responsibility. No, because fault implies that a mistake was made. If I am responsible for something being done, I take on the fault for its lack of completion Only if you think it needs to, or should be done. Relationships aren't a competition that should be keeping score and assigning blame though so this wouldn't apply.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 11:08 PM
10

It’s more common to hear a woman saying we need a war (semi-ironically) to get rid of the excess men than it is to hear one saying the draft should be abolished You don’t actually think this is true do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 09:25 PM
5

I don’t think it’s anyone’s “fault” but I would say it’s largely his responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 07:49 AM
1

So I'm guessing that's a no? The person I’m directly engaging with in the story said not to argue with women. No they didn't lol. That's your interpretation of what they said.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 02:46 AM
1

Is English your first language?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 12:51 AM
–

I don’t think you actually read their comment before replying to it because what the fuck are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 09:51 AM
1

There is no difference, the intent is the same, sexualizing another person There's nothing wrong with finding someone physically attractive though lol I've tried explaining in multiple ways that this aspect is totally normal. it doesnt matter if it was for 3 seconds or 300 I know you don't actually believe this and it's really easy to prove. Pretend you're someone else. You have 2 women looking at you, one makes eye contact for 3 seconds, the other makes direct eye contact for 5 full minutes. Wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 09:35 PM
4

I disagree, if you look you violated their autonomy This is such a weird fringe take that it's not even worth discussing. The vast vast majority of people do not think looking at someone violates their autonomy. there is no difference, you still ogled her ass and objectified her regardless of how long you did it for Looking is not equivalent to being "ogled" and understanding why that matters is the exact opposite of objectification. You can indeed appreciate and comment on people's bodies/looks…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 08:44 PM
5

The fact you had to make that comparison with a significantly larger window proves me right. The fact you had to make your comparison with a significantly shorter window proves ME right. My argument is you shouldn't look in the first place. That's both impossible to socially enforce and not the problem. With obvious exceptions of privacy, or legality, no one cares if you look at someone attractive. It's completely normal. You losers automatically assumed the opposite despite the context clues. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 07:05 PM
4

What difference does it make when the intent is the same? What's the difference between a hug that lasts 5 seconds vs one that lasts 45 minutes when the intent is the same?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 06:25 PM
2

Either way your eyes are still on a woman ass. Well no, there's a genuine difference between looking and staring. Those words have two completely different connotations with staring being much more offensive, off putting and unwanted. Now that I've explained this, if we change your question to "Explain to me how I can look at a woman ass in public in a non-creepy way?" It makes sense right?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 05:59 PM
0

You don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 08:17 AM
23

Explain to me how I can stare at a woman ass in public in a non-creepy way? I’ll wait. The original comment said “look” not “stare” You understand there’s a difference right?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 08:13 AM
8

I’ve heard it countless times from both men and women and different scenarios, This post is actually inspired by some random women at the dmv today who started shouting and disrespecting me and when I started to fight back she said out of her own mouth,And your arguing with a female homophobic slur No one in that story told you not to argue with women. What exactly was the point of sharing that?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 09:47 PM
1

He’s at his mom’s maybe 4 days a month. A point you conveniently left out. "Leaving it out" would imply I knew about it. You're the one providing this information, not me. I was also only receiving assistance for a year Was? or you still are? Because this implies you're still getting it "I temporarily get disability while doing Uber" Notice what happened? You smuggled your conclusion into the premise. You’re assuming the quotes are evidence of “victim mentality,” instead of proving that interpre…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 09:37 PM
2

If they didn’t consider me a friend, why would I consider them a close friend? That's something you need to figure out. You now shifted from “You have a victim mentality” to “I included quotes of what you said” That’s not a rebuttal. What are you talking about? I included quotes of you having a victim mentality, there was no shift lol Quoting someone doesn’t prove your interpretation of them is correct. Why in the world would I need to prove that my opinion is correct? lol Would I need to prove …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 07:13 PM
1

How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 06:31 PM
2

if I’d have to respond, I’d say that most of my closest friends are women. Do these women consider you a friend? You seem more focused on labeling me than understanding what I actually said I literally included quotes of what you said lol They’re trying to provoke. You’re using tactics like minimization "But for whatever reason, women seem to want a metal for their effort." "But it is easy. If it’s not, they’re doing it wrong." Hmm. Tell me more.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 06:27 PM
2

As OP asked, is there a “you-approved” way for men to complain that wouldn’t cause you to, for example, call them idiots or express apathy toward them? How about to their close friends?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 05:56 PM
2

At no point did I call myself a victim That's not what having a victim mentality means lol I’ve been through a long term fucked up relationship, pancreatic cancer, etc. But never has that stopped me from being the best father possible and strongest person I can possibly be. I know, you literally won't shut up about it. Every other comment is either about how poorly someone treated you or how great you are for overcoming such a tough life. Honest question, have you ever told a story involving a w…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 05:15 PM
0

What sob story? It's called a victim mentality to make people sympathetic when you get called out for being dishonest. Notice how nothing is ever your fault or responsibility? "with my ex it didn’t matter what I did it was wrong." " I couldn’t make luxury purchases but she could, and everything was planned based on what she wanted." "there’s big reasons why I’m no longer with her. Part of it was her alcoholism." "Even when it was right, it still wasn’t up to her standards and it was never enough…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 12:00 AM
0

Man, the speed at which your bragging turned into a sob story is hilarious. You went from "women seem to want a metal for their effort." to "gofundme" in like 2 comments lol
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 11:21 PM
–

I often come across people who chronically argue & they tend to have large social circles It depends on what they're arguing about and how they act when they disagree. Some people are just opinionated and it's fine, they can still be fun to be around. Think of someone's uncle who will argue about sports or the best restaurants to go to.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 06:45 PM
–

Would you have responded the same way if i would have said one should point out that “20% of men get 80% of women” is wrong Not the person you replied to but if you wrote 7 paragraphs about it to a completely unrelated comment, yes. Would pointing that out to would make someone socially awkward as well? Huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 05:56 PM
–

Is that your kink?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 06:49 PM
8

Plenty of women here act like that. I have seen many of these women tell me how therapy can't help I genuinely can't think of a time I've seen women on here argue that therapy won't help, so I don't know if I agree with "plenty" In fact if you just search the word therapy on this sub, the top 7 posts are men complaining about therapy with post titles like "Why therapy doesn't work for men and trauma dumping clarity" "The cocky dude with a don't-give-a-fuck attitude toward life will be more attra…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 12:06 AM
4

I feel like you'd be better off sending this directly to whatever woman you're upset with right now instead of making a whole post about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 11:56 PM
1

Sure you could. You could tell me what I said that you actually disagree with instead of wasting time over the definition of a word.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 08:07 PM
1

I assume you didn't answer my question because you know I'm right. This all comes down to you being terrible with your choice of words and tripling down on a bad argument. This doesn't even make sense. You spent the entire time arguing against a point I never made because you misunderstood the word I used.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 07:46 PM
1

Wait what? Why is wanting a woman that doesn't require much effort a sign of bad intentions That's not what we're talking about. The original comment was about guys who date younger women because they're easier to impress. But you haven't explained why it's wrong for an old company with a small corporate budget to hire a junior when they can't afford a senior It's not "wrong". As I've said, it can be a sign of bad intentions or bad management. An older company should already be established, not …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 06:38 PM
1

So, objecting to a truth of something, testing someone's abilities, or making them do something difficult does not imply stress or conflict? No? lol If I asked you to go on a hike or work out are you going to experience stress? Objecting to the truth of something is just called having a different opinion. I really struggle to understand how you get through the day if this is the kind of stuff you consider "stress and conflict"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 05:44 PM
1

I promise you there's lots of happy men out there with happy lives that don't have their partner constantly push us to "be better" I agree. I'm not sure how it disputes anything I said, but yeah. And why is hiring the junior employee with a lower wage bad again? Because it's often a sign that the company cares more about saving money than putting out a good product and they use the persons inexperience against them. Work load, deadlines, pay, etc are all things an experienced employee will call …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 05:35 PM
1

There's a difference between having passionate disagreements about... fun things, like the arts, film, fashion and cookery, philosophy or whatever Uh sure, but I don't know what those have to do with what we're talking about. being ghosted, being grilled on how "ambitious" you are or aren't in an openly materialistic, greedy, selfish way, being nagged to death for not being on a digital leash 24/7, being pilloried because you voted Republican once, etc., which is what most guys mean when they sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 05:19 PM
1

And bitter older women mad at starting to deal with something similar. Yeah, the 3-4 women who spend all their time complaining really are equal to the 50 or so guys. So I can tell you how it is Please do, it's so rare to find a guy online who's unhappy with dating and willing to talk about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 08:16 AM
1

I encourage you to look up the definition of challenge. "an objection or query as to the truth of something" "a task or situation that tests someone's abilities." "invite (someone) to do or say something that one thinks will be difficult" Which of these mean stress/conflict? Challenge and support are two different things. One means to assist or help, the other is a difficult task or problem. You can absolutely support someone through challenging them to do better. Some people need that kind of e…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 08:13 AM
1

It's a good analogy for describing dating in practice for many very sad people - but it's absolutely not a good description of how anyone with self-respect wants their date to be. I promise you that people with self respect do not want someone with no backbone to just "yes man" everything they say.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 07:59 AM
1

But I'm guessing lot of men here didn't get to pair up or experience dating when they were young. You don't have to guess at all. This sub is full of bitter dudes who are mad for being rejected. only to be told they have to date women they either find less attractive (or just look older than they imagine) with baggage from previous partners. Case in point. For some of us this isn't very appealing or even possible to accept. Well, good luck with all that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 07:55 AM
1

That sounds awful. Why the hell would any sane individual want someone who brings more stress and conflicts into their lives? Because being challenged isn't synonymous with stress or conflict. That is possibly the worst and most toxic way to get someone to improve themselves. Okay. How about instead of riding your ass like a "personal trainer" your partner actually encourages you and supports you? Sure. That can fall under challenging you too if it makes you feel more warm and fuzzy. I don't thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 07:51 AM
1

No-one wants dating to be like a job It's an analogy, not a guideline. including but definitely not limited to anime. Opinion discarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 06:12 AM
2

I guess that's a matter of taste but I would hate a partner that CHALLENGES me. Like the last thing I want coming home from work is someone that challenges me This is just semantics on what the word challenge means. Because I'm pretty clearly not talking about someone who gets on your case the second you walk in the door, I'm talking about someone that will hold you accountable when you want to give up on something you're capable of. More like a personal trainer who pushes you. No thanks, I like…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 06:09 AM
–

easier to impress a bad thing It's the difference between hiring an experienced employee that you have to pay more vs someone just starting their career that will accept lower wages because they're just happy to have a job. Why should dating someone be difficult and challenging It shouldn't be difficult, but your partner SHOULD challenge you imo. In the same way that you should challenge yourself to do better.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 01:11 AM
–

What you're saying explains attraction and initial interest, but there's way more to a relationship than just looks. Do you really believe a relationship with two people in completely different stages of their life, with different experience levels would be an even partnership? I mean dudes on this sub are constantly complaining about how women don't bring anything to the table or don't have to do anything but look pretty and you're explaining that's the driving reason behind why men like them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 08:20 PM
0

Huh? I'm not surprised that you would be confused by a description of dating. where men are expected to provide direction, protection, and stability. You're leaving out that each of those things are provided subject to the woman's approval lol How can you be considered the leader if you can be replaced or vetoed for any reason? Your entire thesis falls apart because it's missing one of the most crucial aspects of leadership, which is authority. Even today, many people unconsciously equate mascul…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 12:57 AM
–

Afiak, if the prosecution doesn't "cross the t and dot the i" by vetting the accusation, then it would get revealed in discovery. Charges might get dismissed. I think you've completely lost sight of whatever point you thought you were making. I still have no idea what this has to do with my original comment. Prosecutors wouldn't be brought in to handle a case until it's already been investigated by police/detectives. The lawyers focus is presenting a case, not strictly fact finding.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:44 PM
4

It makes sense because women want to date men who lead. Courting a woman isn't leading. You're literally trying to get favorable approval of someone judging your efforts lol
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:35 PM
–

I don't think you actually understand what I said because discovery is also AFTER charges have been filed. In order to get to that point, you need to gather evidence, how is that supposed to happen fairly if the victim is treated like a liar?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:29 PM
1

A feminist once tried to pull a gotcha on me. By saying, "If women are so privileged, then why are men most leader ship roles''. And, I told her it's the same reason why men are expected to lead in relationships by paying on dates, planning dates, and courting the woman. And she was speechless after I said this. This one is hilarious because even in your own made up scenario what you said doesn't make sense lol We live in a society where men are still expected to be super confident and super ass…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:22 PM
–

Due process in the US legal system protects the right to confront the state's witnesses against you at trial. I believe their point is, how likely is it to get to trial if the victim is treated like a liar during the evidence gathering phase of investigation? The legal system has a mechanism for punishing "true threats", what you call "trash" is a matter of opinion, I caution you to consider whether there are things typically said by women amongst each other that men might also find offensive. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:00 PM
0

and regular people often try and flock to runway models much more, before then settling for everyday people. The vast majority of regular people will never even be in the same room as a runway model. Why do you think VIP sections exist? To keep regular people out lol
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 06:28 AM
-1

How can you even bully someone in india? It's like laughing at the person sitting next to you on a sinking ship
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 05:58 AM
6

Also people are not very comparable to fruits. Well that's just not true at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 10:29 PM
1

I know? As I said before, he's not in jail for similar offenses to what epstein were up to.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 06:46 PM
1

Diddy isn't in jail for anything similar to sex trafficking, killing, or abusing women & children.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 06:33 PM
1

"You say don’t lump flour in, but green bananas don’t wear stickers saying they’re bitter. We don’t know who’s ripe until we mash, and by then it can be too late. You don’t put your parchment on after a bake."
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 06:28 PM
1

That also reminds me of a certain rap artist that’s currently in jail for similar offenses. Who are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 05:53 PM
2

I don't need an argument, your own statement contradicts itself lol. a pussy whipped serial cheater for a father, and a feminist pick-me mom is absolutely NOT a normal upbringing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 10:04 PM
2

I had a pretty normal upbringing. lol As I said, I wouldn't hate feminism if all feminists were like my mom. "my upbringing isn't reinforcing my views! I just relate everything through the way my parents acted and raised me!" ok
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 06:28 PM
1

Care to explain? You have such obvious resentment towards your parents. You don't respect your dad for "being whipped" while constantly mentioning men being raised by "feminist women" which coincidentally, your mom was. Your entire worldview is just so clearly shaped by your upbringing but you don't seem to have done a single moment of self reflection or connection on that. I'm happily married, so I'm leaps and bounds better in mental and emotional well-being I don't think anyone who posts or co…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 07:00 PM
–

I don’t think I’ve ever come across someone who is so obvious in how their childhood trauma affects their personality while at the same time not attempting to acknowledge it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 08:36 AM
-1

Why do you think I'm trolling?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 07:22 PM
2

There were. They didn't want to talk to me. So then you did have an opportunities right? Assigns me to a group of two women. They loudly tell the professor that so not want to work with me cause I'm ugly. What do you exactly think I do here? Nothing, because this didn't happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 06:56 PM
2

Personally I didn't. Like at all. There were some women at work but just +40yo ladies with husbands or kid, even grandkids. Sure, some jobs/industries are just naturally going to have less women in them. But outside of that, you never had college classes with any? Never got into a mixed gender hobby? My only option is a cold approach but I'm too inexperienced, too ugly and too short to even try. Okay well sounds like you got it all figured out then.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 06:53 PM
3

But I mean you've never had women in a shared space? Like a hobby, class, or work?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 05:39 PM
6

How would you not ever get an opportunity to talk?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 05:27 PM
2

You have a social circle?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 06:01 PM
4

Wait, so your issue is that they didn’t want you spamming their sub with 5 posts on the same topic? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 05:55 PM
1

I feel like you're kind of all over the place, and I'm not sure what point you're trying to get across anymore. How? I feel like my point is pretty clear. As dumb as pearl is, her audience size and rhetoric makes her a legit debate target compared to shows like "whatever" or "fresh and fit" that bring on random nobodies. Disliking her as a person doesn't reduce her impact on the manosphere or reach among online viewers. But at the same time, the way in which this has happened is generally a bad …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/26 06:57 PM
0

Yeah, but then she gets grilled over questions regarding divorce or suicide, legit male issues that we care about She talks about these specific issues all the time in her content. It's not like they forced her to defend positions outside her expertise. This is how she monetizes herself. Which turns into anyone caring about those issues as an MRA looking like a clown. This is the unfortunate result of platforming clowns in the first place. It happens to every group. Most leftists just lump anyon…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/26 05:40 PM
3

For as much as the left will remark all day every day about how grifters like Fresh and Fit make themselves look smart by only engaging with the dumbest people they can find, leftist media figures are widely guilty of the exact same thing. Pearl was an easy target. I disagree with how you're framing this because while it's true that pearl is not a strong debater(or a good speaker, or really good at anything she does), she's massively influential and much more of a representative of "her side" th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/26 09:11 AM
–

I don't understand the analogy. Men can't have sex with themselves (well, they can It seems like you DO understand the analogy then. How is that relevant? Because you're not blaming those men for receiving it, only women. I can't have sex with them, as 95% are straight So you can't have sex with the 5% left over because....? I can't date them, marry them, have relationships with them, flirt with them or have children with them. You can do all of those things with men, what are you talking about?…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 06:39 AM
2

Taxes were nothing prior to women getting the vote. But it kind of dispels your original point that the reason the government collects taxes is become of women right? 5-10% in the 19th century (in the UK). What does the UK have to do with this? lol Women have voted to consistently increase taxes and be given more stuff from men. The percentage of women started consistently voting once it was legal was significantly smaller than men. It was like 70% of men vs 30% of women. The vast majority of pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 06:32 AM
–

How so? Because it's like being upset that some random housecleaner at a hotel won't come clean your room lol When men and providing women with everything they want? Everything you listed is also provided to other men too. Maybe it's time for you to stop asking what women can do for you and instead ask what you can do for local men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 03:32 AM
3

The government collects taxes because that's what women have voted for for the last century. lol what? The government started collecting taxes over a century before women got the right to vote. Even if you're only going by the official implementation, it was almost a decade before the 19th amendment was ratified. I know you like to live in reality Correct in which women are not responsible for anything, but this is not the reality we live in. You're literally making shit up and accusing me of no…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 03:25 AM
–

I doesn't seem to be that way especially here. Typically when people say social media, they're talking about youtube, tiktok, instagram etc. But even then the only reason this place isn't also overrun with the same thing is that the mods very specifically remove that kind of content and ban users that push it. One of the mods has even mentioned before that they have way way more comments that violate the rules towards women than the other way around. Besides, women complaining about men is also …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 11:33 PM
–

most partnered women expressing how awful, terrible and lazy men are nowadays (which you can find plenty on this sub!) are in way higher number than the few men who are not joking about hating their wives. Both are dwarfed by bitter single men complaining about women though. Like it's an incredibly profitable industry on social media if you can capture this audience.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 11:02 PM
–

Having your money stolen results in men being made homeless, men killing themselves, men being impoverished, not to mention they're thrown in prison if they refuse/fail. The government: collects taxes You: GOD DAMNED WOMEN
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 10:58 PM
–

Men are resentful of women because they need sex and can't access it. That's an incredibly weird thing to be resentful about lol
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 10:54 PM
3

"You're talking to someone who's a fountain of misplaced rage. Name your cliche; Mother held him too much or not enough, last picked at kickball, late night sneaky uncle, whatever. Now he's so angry that moments of levity actually cause him pain; give him headaches. Happiness, for that gentleman, hurts."
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 10:27 PM
2

But that comment was an example of something you'd say to a woman if you could, in real life?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 10:23 PM
1

Are you like this in real life?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 10:15 PM
1

No the OP directly, but the woman he's referencing. She's complaining about men not communicating properly during dates. OP isn't talking about a specific woman. He's just saying women in general do this. There's another thread of it, I had the two mixed up. OP has a single comment in this thread and it's not referencing anything you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 10:22 PM
1

Fair enough, then guess the OP should also be given advice telling her to improve herself first and foremost to attract the mates that she wants. Absolutely hilarious that you think OP is a woman complaining lol Whining about it on the Internet is pointless. You should take a look at his post history.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 09:53 PM
1

while the more expressive, engaging, and socially fluent men — the ones who can hold a conversation — so often end up “bestie-zoned”? None of this seems to add up. It doesn't add up because you're trying to force it into an either/or dichotomy. It's not black and white. The expressive, engaging guys go on dates and get into relationships too. Women just aren't going online to complain about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 08:27 PM
2

OP doesn't strike me as the active type.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 06:35 PM
3

They said it would be a bonus, not a guarantee. Edit: nvm, you're a lost cause.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 06:27 PM
2

There's nothing uncivil about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 09:37 PM
5

If you wouldn't have sex with them if they were broke then yes, it's prostitution. You hope for financial gain. Wouldn't the guy be a gold digger or sugar baby in your scenario? He's seeking a "provider woman" right?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 09:34 PM
–

You need an internet break. I’m serious. Try to imagine saying that phrase out loud to anyone in public.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 07:06 AM
8

Then why are you spending your time in a debate sub? Go live your life dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 10:47 AM
3

Women are also raised to care more about what they wear than boys.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 06:37 PM
1

Lmao 4 ever
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 08:51 AM
1

where are all my friends Fixed
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 12:25 AM
–

It's not about looking attractive, it's about benefiting them in some way. Any hobby that only benefits him is looked at as "problematic" because how dare he enjoy something regularly that doesn't give her satisfaction in some way. The number 1 ranked hobby was reading. Astronomy and swimming were also in the top 10, so I'm not sure your theory holds up.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 12:10 AM
–

Using video games (or any hobby) as a deal-breaker ignores what actually matters in a relationship. Uh no there are definitely some hobbies that are going to make being in a relationship with that person a hard pass for me. That's perfectly normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 12:01 AM
3

A terminal case of male pattern blindness I fear
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 07:34 AM
1

You're implying young men should only focus on finding long term committed relationships No, you're not understanding that the word relationships means more than "long term romantic partners" Why should'nt men do what young women are doing and also seek hookups? Nothing I said is incompatible with that. You can seek hookups, work out, go to therapy, and foster meaningful relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 09:13 PM
1

How does that change anything I said?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 07:00 PM
1

I’m not talking about romantic relationships exclusively. I’m talking about friends, coworkers, family.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 06:59 PM
2

ok
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 09:12 AM
7

Again, they are doing that for THEMSELVES You're SO close dude. I believe in you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 07:18 AM
8

Why should men put all this effort into being the well rounded, total package "Because it will help him build good coping skills for his mental health and long term relationships." Already asked and answered. What work are women actually doing on themselves Women also go to the gym and are already comfortable going to therapy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 03:11 AM
3

Can't you even say what you believe? Is this hard? You didn't ask lol Confidence is complicated, a person can have all the support in the world, and experience success and still feel incredibly unsure of themselves. On the opposite side, there are people that by virtue of being so used to failing on their own truly believe they can do anything because they've survived. I don't think there's any 1 perfect path that takes someone from A to Z when it comes to things like self esteem. No, I cannot p…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 10:20 PM
2

Of course Glad you agree with me. Do you think that confidence and the lack of it just appear of thin air? Or do you agree it's a result of positive/negative reinforcement? So the way you're going to back up your original claim is to give me a false dichotomy instead of just simply explaining your point? Just pretend I picked one and go from there.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 09:58 PM
2

Do you think that confidence and the lack of it just appear of thin air? Or do you agree it's a result of positive/negative reinforcement? I don't know that my answer would fall into either of your two options. Either way I don't see how that affects my question. I asked you to explain how cockiness, being nice, going to the gym and being in therapy are mutually exclusive?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 09:39 PM
3

They're mutually exclusive, the set of experiences that created one person are diametrically opposite la of the ones that would create another. How?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 09:23 PM
16

why should be bother also being a nice therapy guy on top of that? Because it will help him build good coping skills for his mental health and long term relationships. If literally all you care about in life is getting laid right up until your looks fade and personality suffers from lack of meaningful experiences with other people, then sure I guess OP does have a point.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 07:54 PM
1

I don’t know exactly what you were referring to when you send internal thoughts. It could be as simple as that dress doesn’t look good to more complex things about your life in your direction. I think both apply to the same standard. My point was that some feelings are more complex and may need time to consider before bringing up, I specifically talked about things that would need to be worked on therapy. All of your examples were very simple yes/no issues that aren't a big deal at all. Best of …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 05:56 PM
1

I think it’s a lie of omission when you have a thought and then immediately think you shouldn’t tell your partner or think the thought may be upsetting to your partner. Huh? I guarantee you NO one tells their partner every single thought that comes in their head. Honestly, no one does this in any relationship, from coworker to best friend to marriage. I think you should tell everything to your partner to the best of your abilities. What do you consider the best of your abilities? If you think dr…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 06:09 AM
1

Literally it does. It’s a lie via omission. Omission from what? You don't have a responsibility to tell your partner every single thought that you've ever had. That doesn't make any sense. If it's something your partner specifically asks about and you don't bring it up, or you don't mention it, then yes it would be a lie via omission. Why does everyone here not want to talk to their spouses That's not what any of the people responding to you are saying. You're taking an overly hardline stance an…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 05:27 PM
1

Not telling your spouse something doesn't mean you're keeping a secret. And some issues are better handled on your own, without any of the complications a relationship will add.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 07:43 AM
6

If he can’t tell you everything, it means he is hiding stuff from you to tell his therapist and not you No it doesn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 12:12 PM
–

You forgot to add “with me” to the end of your comment
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 06:04 PM
1

What does physical attractiveness have to do with riding a skateboard?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 07:52 PM
3

I just saw a viral tiktok post How much do you want to bet that getting off social media will do more to improve your dating life in six months than anything you've done in the past 5 years?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 11:55 PM
1

This is funny. You think women are these magical perfect creatures. Can you articulate why you think that? you automatically assume it's impossible for men to be depressed in relationships or marriages. lol what? Maybe this is a language barrier issue but you're the one who made the distinction between boyfriend/husbands and lonely men. I'm telling you there's no difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 05:23 PM
0

If men are drafted, then women should be drafted. This is called a false dichotomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 07:39 AM
2

Women are more likely to get hurt by their boyfriends and husbands, than lonely men. Men can't be lonely if they have a wife or gf?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 07:32 AM
1

Still waiting on those sheets.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 12:58 AM
3

If you’re attracted to someone but want to get to know them first before asking them out is that supposed to be bad or something? Not at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 05:51 PM
2

Ok, but women often assume that men only care about sex just because they want to have sex. If they think/feel that way, it's probably due to not feeling the other aspects of the relationship are being given enough attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 05:45 PM
1

I didn't say anything that would imply that. "I've slept with several dozen women over my life. It wasn't all that." lol ok
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 05:27 PM
–

I've slept with several dozen women over my life. It wasn't all that. If you don't enjoy sleeping with women, it sounds like you might prefer playing for the other team.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 07:26 AM
–

If you ever get a chance to do it you'll understand why.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 03:55 AM
–

Would you like for me to post some sheets Knock yourself out. First local case i found had someone arrested for being a felon in possession of a firearm and that was somehow dropped. You are so right You're phrasing this as if you're mocking the point I made but cases like that are exactly what I'm talking about. It's entirely possible they dropped the case because it was a bullshit arrest or trumped up charges.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 12:09 AM
–

Im so sick of hearing about people that have been in and out of jail 40 times murdering someone. Being arrested isn't the same as being convicted. Most of the time you hear about someone being arrested 40 times, it was for random bullshit like loitering or causing a disturbance.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 10:24 PM
–

I’m still waiting on the supposed benefits of feminism for men You haven't benefited from the sexual revolution?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 10:15 PM
1

I’m not a woman. What did it prove?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 06:33 PM
1

It is when it's used to try to emasculate straight men that aren't getting laid. Do you believe being gay makes him less masculine or weaker than a straight man? If not, then how am I emasculating him? It doesn't take a rocket surgeon to realize that gays have more sex than straight couples. What does that have to do with anything we're talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 05:31 AM
3

Oh, so it's just a veiled "you must be gay" insult towards the guy. Gotcha. Beyond the fact that I know you don't actually care, being gay isn't an insult, so I'm not sure why you think that was my intention. I mean the guy literally said he wishes he was gay lmao Did you give up on your stupid cylon analogy or are you still workshopping that?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 12:33 AM
3

If I say I wish I were a cylon so that I would never die, does that mean I have some questions I've been avoiding for a while now? If it starts affecting your morals/ideologies? Yes. I mean just off the top of my head I'd ask why you're so afraid of dying? Or are you just incapable of understanding a hypothetical? I don't think it's a hypothetical is kind of the whole point I was making lol How would you feel if you didnt have breakfast this morning? It wouldn't make me feel like having sex with…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 09:38 PM
1

You're dumb men wishing they were gay has been around since women existed It's not magic dude, you don't have to wish for it. Live your truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 07:40 PM
3

The issue is that most women are boring as shit. Even if they're not, hanging out with guys would be more fun in most cases. Every time I see guys in this sub say this, I genuinely wonder if they have some things they need to come to terms with about who they're attracted to but I try to avoid that because it's an assumption and probably rooted in some toxic ideas. But then 2 comments later you said I do wish I was gay. So...maybe you do have some questions you've been avoiding answering for awh…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 07:38 PM
0

Show me an instance where a guy raped a teenager wasn’t prosecuted with it in modern times NBA player Josh Giddey
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 07:45 PM
1

I don't think you replied to the right person.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 08:33 AM
0

What about it scares you?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 06:00 AM
1

Why does she think she deserves a specific lifestyle? This isn't unique to women. Everyone believes they deserve a specific lifestyle. Did her father brainwash her with "daddy's little princess" syndrome? I don't know what you're talking about or how this is relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 09:35 PM
–

I honestly thought andrew was in his mid 50s. Yikes.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 07:09 PM
1

This usually happens when someone [woman] sees a guy [fucks a guy] for a week or two, catches feelings, and then gets upset that he didn’t. Suddenly the narrative becomes: “He should’ve told me what he wanted from the beginning!” You're describing a totally different situation from a 1st date. This is a friends with benefits scenario, which is perfectly normal to start asking about intentions. If you're comfortable sleeping with someone, you should also be comfortable letting them know if you se…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 06:40 PM
1

Conservative women don't expect $100 dinner dates. What are you basing that on? Conservative women don't tell the man how much is the right amount to spend as if she were a prostitute. Is that really any different than requiring them to make a certain amount of money so they can afford a specific lifestyle? The man having a good job and being responsible with money to be able to provide for a family So they DO tell the man how much they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 06:24 PM
1

Im not going to debate with a stranger about how many women I've been on dates with. You don't have to. But it's going to make it hard to believe anything you're saying if you're not willing to share any evidence that you actually know what you're talking about. what would be the point? Please tell me. I mean it only helps to back up your points. You made the post, not me. If you don't care about trying to convince anyone that you're right, then yeah you are indeed just ranting which means you'v…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 07:07 AM
12

Youre telling an alcoholic to hang out at a bar 247 and just have some willpower. Its not realistic Well no, that's not accurate because the bar WANTS you to buy drinks. Those women aren't trying to get your attention. A better analogy would be going to a block party. If you're unable to go without getting hammered and embarrassing yourself, then yeah you should probably stay home. However if you want to have a social life and see your friends in those settings, you're going to have to practice …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 01:24 AM
2

How is that is an example of "men should never approach unless he's my type"?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 11:41 PM
5

Well, you don’t become ostracized or jailed for accidentally breaking a card game rule Pardner if you break a rule at my table you better skin that smoke wagon or be prepared to pay a visit to the undertaker to get fitted for a wooden suit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 11:19 PM
2

“Men should never approach me unless he’s my type.” I've literally never seen a single woman say this online or in real life. Not once.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 11:15 PM
1

but even in the most liberal cities in n America it's still an expectation for the man to pay, or refuse to let her pay. It's much better and more egalitarian in Europe, if that's where you live. I'm in los angeles lol and that's never been my experience. Where are you that you're running into this?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 06:38 PM
1

You can take it however you like, I don't mind. Isn't this a debate sub? lol Why post here if you're not interested in defending your position?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 05:42 PM
1

If women largely paid for themselves, and even paid men for it, then men wouldn't have to think about it from a business side at all, now would they? I've literally never been on a date where the woman didn't offer or insist on splitting the check. Are you dating traditional/conservative women? If you are, why are you upset at them exhibiting traditional values where the man is the provider?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 05:39 PM
5

Sex is a gift men give to women. Found my new flair.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 10:02 PM
5

Healthy ovaries.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 09:59 PM
7

Men she loves, dislikes, likes. That implies there ISNT A RELATIONSHIP QUALIFIER. You have a relationship with your boss, your teacher, even your friends. It exists completely independent of dating. You can love your coworker or dislike your teacher and it would still be defined as a relationship. They always worked, got educated, etc literally in the Middle Ages. We have women like Abbess Hildegard of Bingen Abbess came from a noble and wealthy family and was educated through the church. The av…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 09:56 PM
6

Women won’t change if men asked them to be nicer people to talk to What do you think the general reaction of men would be if they were told to be nicer?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 09:42 PM
1

Best of luck to you, not every on here is out to criticize you. I'm not the person you were arguing with lol. I'm just giving my observation. I don't think I'm the one misunderstanding anything right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 08:02 PM
1

a lot of you women on here I'm not a woman. Often times the man is able to make up for certain attributes by excelling in others. The most common being money. So then you DON'T actually have a high bar of multiple attributes you need to have to be able to sleep with women. Glad we were able to clear that up.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 07:58 PM
1

What the hell are you talking about? You legit asked me if your point was invalid. No, I didn't. Where you somehow got that that meant my opinion counts more is ridiculous. If someone claims a certain intersection is dangerous, and you come in and say "actually I hardly see anyone get into an accident there, it's very rare". You are specifically countering their experience with your "more accurate" version.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 07:55 PM
1

Oh I see, you're too childish to have a good faith debate. It's not that at all, it's just that your body count isn't high enough for me to respect you. There is no evidence contrary to what i said. You're saying there's no evidence of women sleeping guys who aren't in shape, aren't wealthy or lack confidence? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 07:26 PM
1

You're being purposefully ignorant asking that. I'm not being ignorant, I'm making fun of you lol He needs to be in shape, have wealth, ambition, confidence, the ability to speak to women in a way that makes them interested. There is an absolutely wild amount of evidence to the contrary for this, but okay. You keep telling yourself all that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 07:07 PM
1

they respect the attributes he obtained to be able to sleep around. What attributes do you need to be able to sleep around? Is it like stats in DND?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 06:57 PM
1

I guess what I'm thinking of is closer to virtue signaling. For example, an out of work actor judging another for taking a role they would never have a chance at getting.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 06:56 PM
1

But it is about preferences? Okay? But no one is arguing whether or not it's a preference. We're saying the preference is hypocritical lol Classic feminism This has literally nothing to do with feminism
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 06:54 PM
1

You're using YOUR personal experience to say their experience is less common. You're literally saying yours counts more than theirs.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 06:46 PM
–

and simultaneously, he maintains his high n-count Would you consider it hypocrisy if the man would sleep around if he could but can't (for whatever reasons)?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 06:00 PM
–

No, there's nothing moral about your height.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 05:57 PM
–

It's not hypocritical because it is 10x harder for a man to have a high body count than it is for a woman. It's respectable because it is hard. If you respect guys for sleeping with a lot of women, you're 100% a weirdo. men have to meet a laundry list of requirements The whiplash of takes on this sub between men needing impossible standards to be with anyone, and women "always choosing to fuck trashy losers" is hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 05:56 PM
0

My point was just that trump didn't/couldn't pardon tate for anything since he didn't have any federal convictions
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 12:18 AM
2

No, that’s exactly what it means. I’m taking it Word for Word. Yes, that's the problem. "Eat the rich" doesn't mean we literally want to murder and eat everyone who makes over 100k, it doesn't even mean you can't become wealthy. It's a simplified slogan, meant to be catchy and grab attention so that the viewer looks more into the movement. If you believe that, the statement really means something else then you should write a different statement to accurately convey the right message. This is wha…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 10:48 PM
3

No, there wouldn't be anything trump could pardon tate for anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 10:35 PM
15

Kevin Spacey Not convicted of anything or brought to justice. P Diddy Only convicted of a lesser charge largely unrelated to what he was accused of and may not have to actually serve time. Epstein lol cmon man. As for R. Kelly, the video of him and a 15 year old girl first came out in 2002, but he didn't face any consequences for another 20 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 10:24 PM
10

Were there any beyond Cosby Cosby didn't even face consequences either. He's walking free.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 10:13 PM
3

So that phrase is saying believe 100% of the women all the time. No it isn't. It's been explained ad nauseum what it really means. Just like kneeling during the anthem, BLM, and Defund the police. All situations where the slogan was attacked in order to ignore the actual issue at hand. where the movement is exactly trying to counter, but we should be trying to get them to neutral not get them to swing the other way. You wrote this in an insanely confusing way, who are you talking about that we n…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 10:10 PM
6

It works pretty well when She-who-Troll jam Elliot Rodgers down our throats 24/7 as an example of a man. I have no idea what the fuck you're talking about lmao Why is it different? Could it be hypocrisy an double standards? Seriously, what are you talking about? Nothing anyone said was related to what an example of a woman is.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 06:17 PM
8

They didn't. They used her as an example of a woman Okay? Then why are they just randomly providing an example of a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 05:26 PM
10

“Ada lluch is an activist for anti-woke and anti-Islam causes, and a defender of the Franco dictatorship as a model preferable to democracy” Why are you using her as an example of a progressive/feminist?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 09:54 AM
1

That no one can actually say they would or wouldn't do anything in the absence of fear. I literally just told you that fear being removed has nothing to do with my question lol. "Fear existing is already assumed."
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 10:28 PM
2

If you're going to lie, you could at least try to make it believable lol
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 09:47 PM
1

Which are often fear based. Some are, sure. What's your point though?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 09:46 PM
1

They learned from women. Let’s not get cute here. Women do it way way way more. You think women call other women sluts and whores, "way way way more" than men?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 09:32 PM
1

You really think that was a smart answer? Huh? It's an opinion, whether you think it's smart or not is irrelevant lol Fear is by definition embedded in the social fabric. It's impossible to remove that feature. By saying "regardless of that fear", it's fucking meaningless since you don't know what the absence of that fear looks like. This is kind of embarrassing. You clearly didn't understand my question because it doesn't matter if fear is removed. My question was if there was any OTHER factor …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 09:29 PM
1

How would one know this if the alternative is impossible? A desire to commit those acts regardless of that fear? lol Did you really think this was a difficult question?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 09:07 PM
1

I'm not sure you understand what I asked if this is confusing you. I was asking about how seriously they believed what they were saying. Has nothing to do with whether or not external enforcement is removable or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 07:47 PM
1

lol again, what you're asking for is impossible so I'm sure what the point is? Like what is the goal of what you're suggesting?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 06:50 PM
1

Remove laws that enforce gender equality. No court, no police force enforcing those specific rights. That doesn't remove external enforcement. That just removes those laws. You would need to remove free will to do what talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 06:29 PM
1

So you aren't asking if I believe in it, you are asking about me personally, that is not an interesting conversation. It's the same question either way. and I disagree, I think it's very interesting that you refuse to engage with your own statement. Probably, statistically yeah. What do you mean probably? How do you not know?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 06:27 PM
1

I don't see how that's possible, so I'm not sure what the point would be?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 05:56 PM
2

No, you are asking if “I” do. Not whether I think people on average do. That is a personal, not general question. No shit? I never said I was asking a general question lol If you believe people fall into these specific groups, you yourself would need to be in one. Are you the norm, or the exception? Are you in that 80%?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 09:16 AM
1

I’m not bothering this idiotic game What game? You claimed that murder and rape was the baseline of humanity then asserted that only a small exception of people respect the rights of others. I’m asking you to see if you genuinely believe that because I don’t think you do. It’s frankly dishonest It’s the fucking point you’re trying to make dude lol What are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 09:01 AM
1

Im not avoiding anything. I asked you a really simple question that you don’t want to answer for some reason. Is a fear of external enforcement the only reason you respect people’s bodies and rights?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 08:49 AM
5

I doing think I can explain my point very well without it sounding bad There’s a really obvious reason for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 08:36 AM
4

Is a fear of external enforcement the only thing keeping you from disrespecting people’s bodies and rights?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 08:35 AM
1

Stop living your life through an excel spreadsheet
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 06:24 PM
–

Again, you don't need the specifics to just say something more substantial than what is normally given to men. You could give me every single detail of your life and I wouldn't be able to give you what you need in a reddit comment. You have to stop trying to shortcut life. Make some friends. if you care enough to give advice, why not ask for specifics? Give me some examples, what are some specific areas you need to improve on that I could ask about? Better to risk "offending" someone than again …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:47 PM
–

No, it's the opposite. His hair is non stylizable lol why do you think that? Says who? I just said it. What rubbicon would he cross that magically would make him "attractive enough" that he were not before. Well he looked homeless before, and now he looks normal. Normal guys are "attractive enough" You have henry cavil that after superman filmings just stay at home vs asmongold improving himself, are both equally attractive? I'm not the one comparing them, you are lol. I don't think it matters b…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:41 PM
–

There's often not even a broad generic hint at improving appearance or dress. What would that even look like? "hey you should try and dress nice and make yourself better looking" I have no idea what you look like so I can't tell you what you can improve on. If you cared at all and don't know why someone's having a hard time, why not ask for more specifics before just dispensing livelaughlove-esque platitudes? Most of the time, it's because that kind of kindness isn't returned or appreciated. But…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:37 PM
–

Nothing more pathetic than the people who spend all their time here You've been here for 3 hours straight and made 28 comments so far.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:18 PM
–

How am I supposed to give you grooming and dress advice over a random reddit comment? That's why the advice is generic, because it's not meant to fix YOUR SPECIFIC PROBLEMS. It's just general good advice. We aren't quest givers that can tell you "go buy these pants and this shirt and say this Reward: 1 GF" This is where it comes back to women have been saying you need support networks for that shit. Friends, co-workers, platonic women. Those are all people who would be massively better at giving…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:12 PM
–

Ok, pick Will Smith and tell us all the haircuts he could have and how better it would be. You think will smith has unattainable movie star hair? they have a predermined vision of what hair do you have, the flowy hair that moves with the wind like the ones popularized with rockstars like kurt kobain and axl rose. Is this a bit? What the fuck am I reading? lol He also would not be considered attractive He would absolutely be attractive enough to date. You're coping hard if you disagree. Looking b…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:02 PM
–

You're just jamming two separate issues together with no evidence. What's the correlation between rejection and suicide and how is it made worse with that advice? what do you think that leads to? Why would that matter? I'm not interested in personal theories without evidence. I could just as easily say the rise in male influencer culture is causing young men to feel worthless because they don't have the same success.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:43 PM
–

Stop thinking that every person have the hair of a rockstar. What are you even saying? If you don't have movie star hair quality it's not worth having? They do not, pick asmongold and give him the possible beard trim and hairstyle he can have and try to convince anyone he would be attractive. Asmongold lives like a feral ghoul. If he actually committed to taking care of his body and exercising he wouldn't look like such shit. https://x.com/Asmongold/status/1099548083849961472 You're lying if you…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:39 PM
–

Men who do this are still doing things they don’t need or want to do. So it’s not them being themselves. Why do you think they don't want or need to do it?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:30 PM
–

The advice is laughable at best, dangerous at worst. Dangerous how?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:27 PM
1

He picks up pros, there's a difference. It's all on stream. LMAO
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 10:37 PM
3

so a portion of mens matches might be bots? You should re read the comment you replied to because I don't think you actually understand what they said.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 10:12 PM
1

Speak for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 07:16 PM
5

For example, a 50th percentile woman, ie, a woman who is of average attractiveness, generally speaking will NOT settle for an average man, and instead wants a man who is the top 5%, and will settle for a guy who is in the top 20% under the right circumstances. You need to stop treating dating/relationships like an excel formula dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 12:58 AM
3

You're more likely to believe an example of someone you don't know and have no idea is real? ok My friend dustin
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 09:43 PM
1

How poor does the person need to be before you would accept them as an example of what I'm saying?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 06:49 PM
1

It’s funny and ironic how progressives and blue-pillers repackaged PUA nonsense with trendy words like “rizz” or “aura.” Why do you think these are terms progressives came up with or popularized? If “rizz” were real, it would work regardless of looks. But it never does. What's your evidence for this?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 06:43 PM
0

Short, fat bald men never get identified as having rizz. Stavros halkias is the epitome of what you're describing and people love his personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 06:40 PM
0

That's not what gaslighting is. I've also literally never come across that. It's definitely not a mainstream opinion in any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 12:27 AM
3

Couldn't read the 3rd article, but the first 2 don't support your point at all lol Did you actually read them or just grab them because the headlines matched your google search?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 10:21 PM
1

A human with XY chromosomes that puts Woman as their dating profile should be reported. You do DNA tests on your first date? How are you struggling so hard with this? I'm not.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 04:55 PM
–

Because they’re women lol How are you struggling so hard with this?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 08:22 AM
1

Why would you report something that didn't happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 03:14 AM
1

If a girl is emotionally neglected by every adult she interacts with, resulting in her growing up into a woman with an inability to properly show emotion and an unhealthy relationship with her inner self, we do not call that "toxic victimhood" and blame her and women in general for the way she is. We accept that she has been hurt by someone and needs help. That's somewhat true for white women, but completely false for minorities, particularly black women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 09:15 PM
1

There's no option in the report feature, to select "lied about gender" Well yeah, why would you report something that didn't happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 08:05 PM
1

I think they don't do this because then it would expose that a large majority of a certain group of people have a criminal record. Real subtle. I know I'm responding to a fake account but they don't do it because it's expensive and takes time. Same reason uber tried getting away without doing background checks on drivers. If they thought they could make more money doing it, they would. It has nothing to do with whatever you're talking about. Same how they have a height filter to filter out the h…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 12:03 AM
5

it's not allowed here and I did report you for it. [This user has been suspended] Well that backfired lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 11:53 PM
1

I don't think you actually desire women at all. You THINK you do, because you think that's what's missing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 11:18 PM
4

There's literally a song with the lyrics I want a man in Finance, 6' 5", Blue Eyes. Tell me where was the part about personality in there? The personality part was having the social awareness to realize that was a tiktok joke that went viral as a trend and turned into a song after the fact lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 08:59 PM
1

If you ignore everything else I said I guess it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 04:15 PM
–

Then why is what OP is saying wrong to you? Because it's a bullshit point? Just because some women DO give verbal consent, doesn't mean they should have to, or that not doing so is causing the situations OP is talking about. Women are the main ones who use the bullshit known as "non-verbal consent." Get better social skills then, I can't help you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 08:01 AM
–

Just because you’ve never heard a woman say those words doesn’t mean they never say them
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 05:22 AM
–

You don’t need to read someone’s mind to see them physically crying lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 05:19 AM
0

People may call me over dramatic but rejection does hurt especially being the person that’s expected to court, to have their life together to stay calm under pressure. The truth is rejection wouldn't be so devastating for men if they did a better job of fostering other relationships and resources for themselves. Too many men make use potential gf's as their sole source of validation, so of course it's going to be more painful when they can't find one or it doesn't work out.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 06:08 PM
9

Think of it like banning sex education in order to stop kids from having sex which leads to spikes in teen pregnancies, conservatives then blame kids having sex on rap music or library books. The war on drugs put a ton of people in jail for small amounts of weed and crack which led to less stable homes, more poverty and more crime/drug use which conservatives then claim we need tougher police to crack down on and the cycle repeats itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 10:04 PM
21

Wait so abortions went up, and women dying of endometriosis and having unwanted children also went up? Who exactly thinks this is a good outcome? It blows my mind how conservatives can vote for policies that make the problem worse and then use that as evidence that they were right all along.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 06:40 PM
1

Then I’m confused, what does your response have to do with me? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 07:39 AM
1

Did you reply to the wrong person?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 05:25 AM
1

I’m sorry I have a height requirement on replies and you don’t meet the current threshold for responses.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 11:53 PM
–

How do you figure? You don't think it's possible to improve on either of those issues?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 04:57 AM
–

They can’t control being autistic. They can’t control being ugly. They can’t control how only a small amount of women are willing to date them. But you can mitigate and work on all of those issues. You're essentially saying "if it's hard you're allowed to give up" which is true, but then why are they complaining about it? They made their choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 08:08 PM
–

I just want sex and arm candy so other men won't make fun of me for being a sexless loser. Can they still make fun of you for other things? But men and women can't and shouldn't be genuine friends. It's unnatural. Isn't this a bit like a person afraid of heights telling everyone it's unnatural to have buildings over 2 stories tall? Do you think cavemen and cave women were interacting with each other for anything other than reproducing? Who cares?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 07:54 PM
1

No, being shady makes him untrustworthy. Gaslight much? What do you think gaslighting is?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 04:54 PM
0

Have you considered it’s because you come off untrustworthy and obsessive in person?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 07:16 AM
2

LA had the absolute most whack people taking public transportation. It's because not having a car in LA is a sign of way bigger problems. Mental, financial, legal, whatever. It's like not everyone who struggles takes public transit in LA, but everyone who takes public transit in LA is STRUGGLING. Way worse than the other major cities I have been in. Never let car companies have a say in how your city is laid out. Because they're going to put freeways everywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 09:03 PM
7

A photo of a woman sucking her fingers on the bus? That could just mean you live in los angeles.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 04:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter