TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

campushippo Archive

View 0 posts and 86 comments by campushippo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I can't imagine anyone but a bitter divorcee wanting one of these.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 07:03 PM
1

That's, sadly, also true.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 06:08 PM
1

It's Twilight for 30-somethings.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 06:06 PM
1

I really enjoyed Brave too.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 06:06 PM
3

This makes me angry. I get into argument after argument about this. I don't think it is fair to paint men as evil, sex-crazed beasts for being visually stimulated. While I will argue that it would be rude, for example, to stare at a girl's chest while she is trying to talk to you (and conversely it would be rude to stare at a guy's package while he was trying to talk to me), being attracted to a woman's appearance isn't the problem there. It's a lack of manners.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 06:05 PM
2

I suppose it depends on the woman, but a few of the girls I know don't really schlick based on appearances. It's the setting and actions and in the fantasy that get them off. That's not to say a woman can't objectify a guy based on his appearance. I just mean a lot of female masturbatory fantasies have more to do with allocation of power and creating a specific mood more than they necessarily have to do with what the guy involved looks like.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 06:03 PM
2

women need to get the same legal treatment as men I couldn't agree with this more, and I'm a woman. It really bothers me to think that my brother and I could commit the exact same crime or my boyfriend and I could commit the exact same crime and be treated totally differently for it. I love them both very much. I know the legal system operates in my favor, and some would say I should be grateful for it, but I can't be knowing the people I care about are treated like they have less worth to socie…
/r/MensRights01/11/12 02:36 PM
2

I agree with you. I think it could also be argued that that is the best way to handle any physical altercation (male or female opponent). Retain the moral high ground when you can. Don't fight with the intent to harm unless you're in immediate danger.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 02:35 PM
1

I do. I frequent both r/MensRights and r/Feminism. I don't completely side with either because both are prone to occasional sexism and often dismiss each other without listening. There are two sides to every story. The truth tends to lie somewhere in between.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 02:30 PM
11

One of the only useful things my mother ever taught my brother and I was that it is wrong to hit people. That we should under no circumstances strike first, because in doing so we have showed that we are too stupid to communicate effectively with words and must resort to the ape-like behavior of using fists. But should anyone hit us first, man or woman, we defend ourselves accordingly. I'm a girl. I learned not to beat on men. My little brother was only "little" for so long. It took one cold-coc…
/r/MensRights01/11/12 02:26 PM
4

Thank you for the thoughtful response!
/r/MensRights31/10/12 09:06 PM
3

both parties have to agree if any fetus is to be carried to term. Not a bad idea. Now how do you propose we resolve situations in which one partner wants to abort and the other doesn't, if both of their opinions ought to be equally influential?
/r/MensRights31/10/12 07:46 PM
5

I find the opposite case to be more compelling.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 03:32 PM
6

I completely forgot about adoption as well. I remember reading that there are fewer children up for adoption than there are "Pro-Life" households. So why aren't they adopting? It's that age-old issue of people wanting to have something to bitch about, but not wanting to actually sacrifice or do anything to fix the problem. When someone says "I am Pro-Life", I hear "I like to feel morally superior to you by saying things that sound good to me and then refusing to actually do anything that require…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:12 PM
12

My issue is that his stance is not "Pro-Life". It is "Anti-Abortion". There's a huge difference. Studies are repeatedly showing that access to free birth control lowers the number of abortions. So if people are actually pro-life, why isn't lowering the number of abortions their primary goal? Criminalizing abortions, while possibly (though I have my doubts) having the effect OP describes here, will also result in black market abortions. Without being able to regulate sanitation or even medical ba…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 01:39 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 06:57 PM
3

If we're going to have sex-segregated locker rooms But gender doesn't actually operate in a binary system. So what do you do with the male-to-female transitioning individual who can't go into a women's locker room for fear of being ostracized and can't go into a men's locker room for fear of being physically assaulted? Or this person who identifies as both genders? Either offer individual changing rooms or offer non-gender specific changing rooms or even both for people who would feel uncomforta…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 01:24 PM
1

Again, I wish you would actually explain why this bothers you so much, rather than make judgments and close off discourse. I'm not here arguing that I deserve free dinners. I'm not here arguing that he should have to provide them. I'm not here arguing that this should be expected of men. Quite the opposite. I simply stated that I thought it was generous that he does, and that I appreciate how generous and unnecessary that is. Are you honestly of the mind set that because someone chooses to pay f…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 09:32 PM
1

I'm not quite sure I can properly asses the intonation of your statement. Would you kindly elaborate? Perhaps I should offer a few more details? This is the first relationship I have ever been in that has operated in this manner. In the past, I've always been more financially stable than my partners. I've opted to take care of partners financially, whether they were going to school and couldn't work, or they were just having difficulty finding a job, or their jobs were unstable and infrequent. I…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:32 PM
-2

I think it depends on the individuals in question. The guy I am dating pays more often than not. It isn't expected of him. In fact, I appreciate the gesture. I think it's very kind. He refuses to allow me to pay for an entire meal, but sometimes I can convince him to let me pay for myself. Because of this dynamic, I often offer (or sneak ahead and do it anyway) to pay admission prices for events we go to. I also make a point of giving him gifts every now and then to show him how much I appreciat…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 01:33 PM
9

It just seems to cruel to treat trans individuals like red-headed step-children. If someone identifies as a female I'm happy to share a changing room with them. To be perfectly honest, I don't really care who is in the dressing room. I don't understand the ideology that a locker room is supposed to be some kind of "safe space" and that genders can't ever be naked around each other without it being sexual. It's a bunch of bullshit. I say we do away with gendered spaces unless it's some kind of su…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 01:14 PM
2

That said, the position of the church on the matter, as a former catholic, is something that pisses me off to no end. I understand why. It's asinine.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:27 PM
10

I feel this 100%. It extends to other terms too. I interrupted some asshat being snarky and rude to another commentor because she used the term "catty". I was astounded. It isn't even actually a gendered term. It's just used more often in regards to women, likely because women are more often passive aggressive than men. Some people like to think it is because Patriarchy. I think it's just because of traditional gender roles. Women aren't "supposed" to be aggressive, so they're passive-aggressive…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:23 PM
6

I'm not sure how you got any of that from my post. I'm all for contraception. I don't, however, appreciate being told how to vote based on my gender, and I could see how a religious individual could find that suggestion offensive in other ways. Iirc, most Catholics believe in using contraception. It's just the official position of the church that they shouldn't. So I'm not really sure where you're going with this?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:12 PM
3

I never argued they didn't. I simply presented another way the offensive suggestion that my gender should decide how I vote could be interpreted.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:10 PM
7

Is it a bad thing to try to be empathetic with people you disagree with?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:06 PM
12

If I were religious, I would really resent the implication that A) I'm not a woman unless I want to make birth control available for all women and B) that my gender should be more important than my spiritual beliefs.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 04:59 PM
7

I would still argue that it was their lack of common sense, not their lack of testicles, that led to that.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 01:37 PM
1

It perpetuates the stereotype that women are "nurturers" and "mothers", furthering the ideology that those qualities are required in women, strengthening the sexist notion that women should be mothers first. It bolsters the theory that women belong in the home. And in doing so, bolsters the notion that men are "providers" and should be fiscally supporting a woman and her child. It also supports an environment in which women are not held accountable for their own reproduction by treating them lik…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 10:28 PM
2

You're being deliberately short-sighted. Pointing out that, in this particular situation, both men and women have it bad (men in tangible/fiscal ways, women in intangible/philosophical ways), opens discourse and allows individuals that would normally treat each other as "the enemy" to actually try to problem solve together.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 10:13 PM
0

No. What I'm illustrating is, without actual details or intimate knowledge of the individuals involved, everything is just opinion, and pretty worthless.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:55 PM
2

So, in a Men's Rights group, no one should ever suggest that MRA's might be able to work together with other discriminated against groups, even if it is mutually beneficial (meaning it also helps MRAs)? Still getting the impression you don't want this subreddit to actually accomplish anything and prefer to just keep it as an exclusive little club where people just complain without discussing solutions. And people say feminists enjoy their victimhood.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:25 PM
2

This is a reddit for men's rights, it isn't one for women to come into and claim they are the victims. But no one said women were the victims. It was just a discussion opened up about how this might be an issue that affects both genders and that both genders should be working together to fix it. I sincerely hope all MRA's aren't so possessive over victimhood and exclusive about who is allowed to address issues of gender discrimination as you are. Nothing will get accomplished if that's the case.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 08:34 PM
2

That's not what this discussion was about, though. This discussion was about how the issue of gender discrimination in family courts affects both men and women negatively and that it should be something that feminists and MRAs could agree needs to be rectified. Besides all that, though, if women playing the victim card actually resolves the issue, why would you have a problem with that? Unless, that is, it isn't so much that you care about problems being solved, as much as it is you want to be t…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 08:23 PM
2

So gender discrimination is now a competition? Why on earth would you try to divide people on a problem like this one? I don't understand. Discussing the legally sanctioned discrimination against men in family courts and it's philosophical implications regarding women is a way to get people to agree that something needs to be fixed, when they might not have otherwise. It's almost like you want men to remain disadvantaged in this way so that you can remain a victim.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 08:14 PM
2

Woman getting primary care of children in court is not against women, it is against men. False dichotomy.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 08:06 PM
4

And I'm going to go out on a limb and say they likely did love each other and wanted to attempt marriage, but the difficulties the guy's disabilities posed were unprepared for, leading to the end of the relationship. No matter which side we take, we're both just speculating about people we don't know with little to no details about their personal lives.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 07:15 PM
1

Ah. So divorce automatically means people didn't love each other. I have quite a few people to share the news with.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 07:11 PM
1

Or maybe she just loves him and it doesn't bother her that much because she knows the man she loves is still there, even if he doesn't look the same. Maybe people like you are the reason she doesn't look ecstatic in the photograph.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:48 PM
1

It makes sense. I guess I'm just very fortunate. I don't feel that oppressed. I'm a white, heterosexual, upper middle class female. It's just easier for me to focus on fixing the injustices other people face. I get disheartened when others don't do the same. I have to remind myself that it isn't really their fault.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:11 PM
7

No. It's because Cosmo plays both sides of the fence. On one side, they tell girls that they are all beautiful and they have to love themselves for who they are and not compare themselves to other women. Then they spend sixty pages shoving how many products you need to buy in order not to be fat/ugly/smelly/etc., because those are your default, down your throat. Your smile is never white enough, your waist is never thin enough, and your skin is never flawless enough according to Cosmo. It's a ma…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 03:18 PM
11

And that's how akrabu's friends died in a freak gasoline fight accident. :(
/r/MensRights02/10/12 03:05 PM
2

I hate Cosmo. I don't like being told by other women what I am and am not supposed to feel and think, and that's pretty much all Cosmo does.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 03:03 PM
6

Exactly. All it really takes is finding ways to show people how negative their behavior is. Even if it's just showing disapproval. When my guy friends sit and talk about girls in a really disrespectful way, I let them know that it's not okay to treat people like that, and that it is offensive, and likely why they can't find their "dream girl". When my girl friends sit and talk about guys in really disrespectful ways, I let them know that it isn't acceptable to deny another human being basic dece…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 03:02 PM
2

The exact same can be said for black power, white power, feminism, MRA, nazi, westboro church, etc. Any group that sets up a feedback loop to itself, will see itself isolated and xenophobic. This is so true. I just find it difficult to understand how this isn't obvious to everyone. It's almost as people want to believe that they are the only victims. Which seems like a sad, self-absorbed existence to me. What's the point if it isn't to make things better for as many people as possible?
/r/MensRights01/10/12 04:29 PM
6

That makes my heart hurt.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 03:37 PM
16

I will never understand why people on both sides of this fence are so adamant about denying the existence of negative social effects of being a member of one or another gender. So many feminists are so quick to deny the existence of any situation in which men might be disadvantaged. So many MRA's are so quick to deny that women often do face disadvantages as well. It's infuriating.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 03:09 PM
2

You should have responded, "I'm sorry. It's just been such a long time since I have seen someone so odd looking. I must have forgotten my manners. You're right. It isn't polite to stare at the less fortunate looking."
/r/MensRights27/09/12 02:41 PM
1

There are so many things wrong with this article. It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:00 PM
1

Thanks for the informative reply. I didn't think of it that way. It makes sense.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 08:33 PM
5

Culture. Human history. Together they shape how people in large groups "think". Women receive more sympathy than men for cheating in Western culture. You'll find the opposite in the Middle East. *Before anyone goes off on some tirade about how we can't exploit the abuse of women in the Middle East to show how women are mistreated and pretend it applies here blah blah blah - I wasn't. Just noting that our culture is to blame for this way of thinking and that other cultures may not conform to ours…
/r/MensRights20/09/12 02:49 PM
1

Isn't it? I find that when people discuss victim blaming and victim responsibility, the hypothetical situation described is almost invariably "girl gets drunk at party, is wearing skimpy clothing, is hanging out with men she doesn't know, etc." and so many people draw the conclusion that the victim's clothing became the determining factor as to whether or not she would be hypothetically raped. Thus, women should not dress provocatively. I always found this to be a bit absurd. In that overly used…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 07:06 PM
1

I agree that it may increase the likelihood of sexual harassment. I do not agree that it increases the chance of rape. You may want to check out the results of this study. I found it interesting. “While people perceive dress to have an impact on who is assaulted, studies of rapists suggest that victim attire is not a significant factor. Instead, rapists look for signs of passiveness and submissiveness, which, studies suggest, are more likely to coincide with more body-concealing clothing. (140) …
/r/MensRights19/09/12 06:30 PM
3

I agree. I don't think it's accurate at all to say that if a woman wears more modest clothing she may lower her chance of being raped. I think if people instead said that getting overly inebriated to the extent that a person can no longer adequately asses their risk of being victimized (in any capacity - meaning not just rape but muggings and violent crimes - as well this also includes men) may increase the likelihood that a person may be victimized is much more accurate. This statement does not…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 02:51 PM
3

Because men just love it when a woman uses a condom to give him a blow job. This isn't a fucking competition. Sex is pretty dangerous no matter how you cut it.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 02:12 PM
1

Pretty much.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 01:16 PM
13

They hate men because they are bad people. No. They hate men because they're unstable and (in many instances) mentally ill and they can't (because of this mental illness) blame themselves. Men are their bogeyman. The world isn't black and white. There aren't "bad people" and "good people". There are people who sit on various parts of the moral spectrum for various reasons. Just like inner city criminals are a product of their environment, fucked up women are too. They were either raised that way…
/r/MensRights14/09/12 06:50 PM
12

Same thing happened to me. I have almost no relationship with either of my parents. They made my life miserable trying to make each other's lives miserable. Now I'm 24 and I don't know what a healthy relationship looks like anymore. I wish more parents understood how damaging it is for kids to witness a messy divorce. And the ones that understand and "can't help it" or "allow their emotions to get the better of them" can all go fuck themselves. When you have kids they're supposed to me more impo…
/r/MensRights14/09/12 04:23 PM
32

I feel really bad for her kids because she doesn't sound like the type of person to handle the divorce and custody judgment well. She'll be the type of person that openly disparages the other parent in front of her kids and creates a climate where her children feel like they are always forced to "pick sides". I don't understand hurting your children to prove a point. :(
/r/MensRights14/09/12 03:49 PM
63

It blows my mind too. It makes sense to a crazy person, though. Think about it. The system is so ridiculously gamed in women's favor. Anyone who works in family law can tell you this. You have to be a monstrously despicable human being to lose your children if you're a woman. I mean, there needs to be an absurd amount of documentation of abuse, neglect, etc. Even then, many times the courts will still award custody to the mother. The only type of women that don't understand this, are the monstro…
/r/MensRights14/09/12 03:48 PM
2

Thank you for this. I had trouble, when self-identifying as a feminist, reconciling how much issues that affected men were ignored. I've maintained that bother genders deal with bullshit because of gender norms, and had difficulty accepting the theory of Patriarchy. Now I know why. I still argue that there are instances in which women are disadvantaged, though more in a cultural/societal way than in an institutionalized way. This seems to be a problem for many MRAs who get really upset should I …
/r/MensRights13/09/12 04:07 PM
0

You're funny. :)
/r/MensRights12/09/12 07:59 PM
0

Wow. You are a very sad little man aren't you? Yeah, like all those men in Prison no one cares about.... You're right. From what I know, men are more likely than women to get raped here. That still doesn't mean some rape victims don't get fucked over. I'm not arguing that their problems are worse, I'm just making note of something that happens. And the scary thing is, I have 2 teenage daughters... I feel so sorry for them.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 07:52 PM
1

It most certainly is. I'm not going to sit here and lie and argue with you over that one. My uncle was one such guy. I know it happens and I know it's awful and I know something needs to be done about it. That doesn't mean actual rape victims don't get screwed too.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 06:46 PM
1

I know it wasn't meant to be funny, but your comment made me laugh. Men and women are both so screwed. Feminists seem to forget that men get fucked over as bad as they do. Really, though, it's all of us. I think about how some men really do consider never getting married or having kids because some women really are fucking wretched and the family courts won't back the men up. I think about how some women really do avoid interactions with men because if they get raped, the criminal court system i…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 06:29 PM
1

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 08:01 PM
2

Having sex with someone is as close as you can physically get to another person. Unless you eat them. Then you can fit even more inside of you, which, technically makes them even closer than sex. Sex is one of the few experiences that forever changes your relationship with another person. Personal opinion. Unless you have actual evidence aside from personal experience that this is a fact and always holds true, don't use it as an argument to justify why other people are wrong for not agreeing. Wh…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 07:23 PM
9

if you do it with a lot of people is it really intimate, is it special or is it something you would do with just anybody who would consent Whether or not you view sex as sacred does not necessarily influence whether or not you think it is acceptable to lie to your partner. I don't view sex, the act, as something special. It's actually something very base, very animal. When it is with someone special, however, it becomes something different, for me. Infidelity has less to do with whether or not a…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 05:57 PM
11

People with many sex partners are perceived as more likely to be unfaithful. This is sad to me. I have a "high number". I have never cheated. I made an effort to be honest with myself and my partners about what my intentions were. I am not an unfaithful individual. When I was ready for a long-term, monogamous relationship, my sexual habits changed. What people should base their fears of infidelity on is whether or not their partner has a history of cheating, not how many people they've been inti…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 04:46 PM
2

::sigh:: First of all, as far as I am aware, there are no laws saying you can't sit with your smart phone/tablet/whatever the fuck and watch a fucking porno. I asked you to explain how there's a material difference between someone reading sadistic, violent literature over your shoulder and someone watching a movie over your shoulder. There isn't. However, there is a difference between the likelihood that a person will notice and see what is on the page of a book and noticing and seeing a graphic…
/r/MensRights07/09/12 08:02 PM
2

nude photos on a tablet extreme, sadistic porn lit You're deliberately using descriptions here to reduce the conversation into black and white terms that it doesn't actually exist in. Your bias is showing. Porn (in film, literature, and print) has a wide range of types. Let's be realistic. If watching porn in public were to be encouraged, a great deal of it would not be "nude photos". It would be graphic depictions of sex (and likely not only watched by men). And for the record, if you think 50 …
/r/MensRights07/09/12 06:49 PM
2

I don't think the comment was a comparison of "male vs. female" porn as much as it noted the differences between erotic literature, and erotic film. We know 50 Shades of Grey is erotica. We know what erotica is. Kids, though? Particularly small ones? No clue. So if we have a woman on a bus reading 50 Shades, and stranger with their kid sits down next to her, no one really has to worry about the kid. If we have a man on a bus watching porn on a tablet and a stranger with their kid sits down next …
/r/MensRights07/09/12 03:42 PM
1

I agree that nothing is black and white. Just pointing out how silly it can be to shift focus after the event of a crime to what the victim could have done or could not have done to prevent being victimized. Any situation can be boiled down to decisions a person made that put them in the right place at the right time to have something happen. Getting black out drunk is foolish, regardless of whether or not the person gets raped, because it is dangerous and unhealthy on its own. I start taking is…
/r/MensRights06/09/12 05:23 PM
3

You probably shouldn't walk down a deserted alley in a skirt and high heels. Actually, you probably shouldn't walk down an alley dressed conservatively, while looking at the ground and advertising the fact that you are shy, fearful, and easily overpowered. If you're going to walk down a deserted alley, it's likely better to be in a short skirt and heels, with your head held high, talking loudly on your cell phone. You make yourself look too secure to be easily intimidated and too loud to be wort…
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:35 PM
1

but they stupidly put themselves in compromising situations that allowed their rapists the opportunity. I mean, sure. That could be said about pretty much any unfortunate event that ever happened to anyone. It's like saying someone who was killed by a drunk driver only died because they chose to take that specific route home and drive at night when there would be more drunk drivers on the road. Would you say that to the victim's family? Or maybe my grandmother, who hasn't and doesn't smoke, marr…
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:20 PM
14

Agree. We as people should hold ourselves to a higher standard and be reasonable, though firm, in our morals and ethics.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 01:48 PM
1

It makes sense in any group, if you really think about it. Whenever there is a revolution of any kind, it doesn't just stop when things start to get better. They almost always go overboard. Look at where the sexual revolution of the 6o's left us. I mean, I think it's pretty safe to say, the solution to some of the social problems we face to today regarding sex, sexuality, and the byproducts of sex (childrens <3) is not to revert to the way things were before. If that had been working, there woul…
/r/MensRights06/09/12 01:40 PM
1

I really like make up, and clothes. I know it may seem bizarre to you, but I honestly don't factor men into my decisions as to how to present myself. Unless, that is, I'm covering up because I don't want to encourage unwanted attention (I know not all men are rapists, but putting the twins out significantly increases the likelihood the twins will be commented on/stared at). For me, make up and clothes are like costumes. Every day I get to put together a new character. Fashion is fun for me. A go…
/r/MensRights05/09/12 10:03 PM
1

This guy Go watch it. It's funny. :)
/r/MensRights05/09/12 09:59 PM
1

Super true! I've spent most of my adult life being "counter-culture". I wore hipster clothes. Cut my hair really short and dyed it funny colors (a girl with short hair?! eeeewwww!). Wore piercings and tattoos. For the most part, few people seemed to judge me harshly. Only those I would have otherwise expected it from (older generations, fundamentalists, etc.). Recently, I became rather exhausted with putting that much effort into defining myself via outward appearance. I gave myself a make over.…
/r/MensRights05/09/12 09:42 PM
3

In that case, you are certainly correct. Kudos for amiable conversation. :)
/r/MensRights05/09/12 09:27 PM
5

Mmm...be careful with that. Depends on how "early" you're talking. The original churches established by the Apostle Paul actually featured women as active members of the church community. It wasn't until teaching authority and church hierarchy became widely regarded as matters of importance within the Christian faith that the inherent inferiority of females became its own issue. The Epistles Timothy and Titus are not usually accepted by biblical scholars as having been written by Paul and were p…
/r/MensRights05/09/12 08:04 PM
9

We've been objectified and put down and treated like less than a man since the invention of Christianity (please don't start a religious debate). This is wildly incorrect. Differences between the genders and they way they treat each other have existed long before the advent of Christianity. Also, Christian teachings regarding a subservient role for women within the church community (noted in the books of Timothy and Titus in the New Testament) are widely regarded by biblical scholars as having b…
/r/MensRights05/09/12 08:00 PM
2

Situations like this are so sad. I feel like it should be obvious that communication is a requirement for solving any problem. Rape happens. False accusations happen. I'm less concerned with the numbers and more concerned with sorting out a system that protects both legitimate (::I cringe using that word in this sentence after all the recent hullabaloo::) rape victims, and those falsely accused of rape.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 07:51 PM
6

Meaning that we don't care a lot when there's a bit of sexism in a post. we don't care a lot when there's a bit of sexism You just explained that not only does obvious sexism occur in this subreddit, but, as a community, you're apathetic to it. This is exactly why people think r/seduction is predominantly sexist. Raeko commented in a thread that specifically asked why people assume this subreddit is sexist with a thought out and honest answer that makes plausible sense. If you don't want want to…
/r/seduction01/08/12 09:40 PM
1

This is only conjecture, but perhaps it has something to do with the PUA vibe associated with this subreddit (what can I do to manipulate this female into sleeping with me?).
/r/seduction01/08/12 09:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter