TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

canad93 Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by canad93 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

I know this analogy is problematic, but where did you draw that assertion from?
/r/MensRights07/12/13 06:31 PM
4

The childish implication (hopefully) wasn't intended. The point was in condemning a select group who see preventive measures on their part not as methods of keeping them safe but as society defending rapists (ie don't tell me to watch my drink, teach men not to rape instead). I agree, though. There are too many other things in these pictures that make the argument look absurd.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 06:29 PM
1

I see what you're saying, but I disagree to an extent. It's not a matter of which word is more insulting - each one of the those words could be taken pretty offensively depending on the person. But the term vagina doesn't carry any sort of colloquial use for most people, so referring to someone as a vagina is directly identifying them by their sex and implying that their point is less valid or you're less inclined to acknowledge their point because they're women. Similarly, if a female senator c…
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:42 AM
79

Exactly. I laughed at the joke, but it really isn't a valid argument and doesn't have a place in Men's Rights. It just makes us look bad.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 02:24 AM
2

I agree that it seems too stupid to be legitimate. A false-false-flag, though? That shit complicated.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 10:04 AM
7

I can't help but think someone would eventually go "oh, hey, our acceptance of female applicants is a massive statistical anomaly this year.."
/r/MensRights18/04/13 10:02 AM
3

Coincidentally, the marxist sub is extremely feminist.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 11:09 PM
1

I like that we downvote those we disagree with instead of banning them. Censorship looks good on absolutely no one.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 11:06 PM
2

You're being reasonable, for the most part. Claims of indoctrination can be offensive when they are used to devalue a viewpoint. However, in this case, it is perfectly clear that the girl being represented is irrational and not displaying an intelligent opinion (men don't have problems). So the options are either that she's simply ignorant, or that she is subscribing to societal indoctrination, which I don't believe is offensive in this case. Your claim in the previous post, however, that the OP…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:31 PM
3

to get women to care about anything other than women and feeling sexy I feel for your struggle, that's a lot of shit to go through. However, just because you have not met many women deeper than this (or have not gotten to know well enough the ones you have met) does not make it fair to generalize women as such. If myself and others here are going to be critical of women who generalize and oversimplify men, it is quite hypocritical to do the same ourselves.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:20 PM
1

I agree. Assuming that someone is 'indoctrinated' because they have a differing viewpoint is offensive and ignorant. It's demeaning to men and women, and whomever it is used upon. You'll never understand the other side if you refuse to acknowledge their opinion as anything other than conformity to mass mis-education.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:14 PM
2

That I am in fact allowed to swing my cock around hither and yon inside a men's bathroom, even if women are present. Such an eloquent way of describing such an..uneloquent gesture. It makes it seem as if this is the freedom that you gleefully live for. Well executed.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 07:16 AM
1

To further the information you're already getting, I work in restaurants, and women's washrooms are typically magnitudes worse than then men's, which is funny because the men's are used far more frequently. Because they assume everything is nasty, so they nest (usually), and then don't want to throw out their own toilet paper. Or they squat and somehow hit the seat.. Either way it's annoying as fuck when four women's stalls need to be cleaned more often than one men's stall.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 07:11 AM
1

On rare occasions I have been known to use the men's restroom to avoid a long line in the lady's but first I ask the guys inside if they mind. Typically it's in a bar setting so they're drunk enough to allow it. No, no, NO! C'mon, guys! Peeing is one of the things we're good at! It's a slippery slope between letting someone jump lines and restroom communism, equal waiting times for all!
/r/MensRights02/11/12 07:07 AM
3

Contrarily, crossing state lines makes it a federal law enforcement problem doesn't it?
/r/MensRights13/10/12 08:52 PM
6

Think of it this way. By staying at home and raising the kids, doing valuable things around the house, etc, they allowed you to focus solely on work, which in equivalent to contributing some sort of monetary value right? Sure, in some cases this isn't correct. I think in cases where one parent foregoes a career to stay at home, alimony should be an option. Otherwise, this doesn't make any sense. And sometimes, they refuse to work, or for whatever reason, one parent ends up carrying the majority …
/r/MensRights11/09/12 04:35 AM
1

But its not just saying that you think the Nazis were correct, you're not allowed to openly advertise for them as a group due to the fact that what they stand for is illegal, and in doing so you are essentially conspiring to break the law. You're trying to illicit support for what would be a criminal organization. If someone marched around Times Square telling you they were a member of Al-Quaeda, and that you should join them in their quest to rid the world of infidels, there would be repercussi…
/r/MensRights14/07/11 05:10 PM
1

There is a ridiculous amount of European misinformation in this thread. (I'm looking at you, people-deflecting-attention-back-across-the-ocean).
/r/MensRights14/07/11 07:15 AM
1

Why?
/r/MensRights14/07/11 07:12 AM
1

Do you have a source for the dropping of collaborators? I've never heard that before, sounds pretty extreme.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 07:12 AM
1

Yet completely different from what you said before. Talking about the regime is not the same as supporting it publicly. And it seems extreme here, but if I were German, and I had a part of my history in which a disgusting and almost universally morally reprehensible philosophy took over and resulted in my country being turned into a bonfire for the rest of Europe, and eventually split in half, I'd probably ban support of that as well. The Nazis were a tyrannical government that would have been d…
/r/MensRights14/07/11 07:09 AM
20

Their world is one of fantasy, where we can prevent female rape simply by telling men not to rape women. That is the problem. Complain all you want about the attention women get as potential rape victims, and the onus on them to protect themselves, but the reality is we can't stop crime from happening just because it's wrong. I don't complain that I have to look over my shoulder or put my ipod away when I'm walking through a sketchy neighbourhood, thinking damn I really wish someone had told the…
/r/MensRights07/05/11 03:34 AM
6

That's not victim blaming. They didn't say "you deserve to get raped because you're dressed like a slut" they more or less implied "dressing like a slut is going to attract attention from sketchy people and those people might be the kind of people who would push a limit". It's not like rapists walk around going, "Gee, I'd really like to rape a girl tonight, but only if she's dressed like a skank, because those girls deserve it..." How is "most ardent opposition" vague and arbitrary, and able to …
/r/MensRights07/05/11 03:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter