TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

candlestick_maker Archive

View 1 post and 22 comments by candlestick_maker on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

candlestick_maker/r/askTRP30/08/14 10:23 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

And in all honesty, cheating and divorce are legitimate responses to being in an unhappy relationship. At first blush you seem like an extremely manipulative guy, so it comes as no wonder to me that you've had bad relationship experiences. Why should any woman be concerned about making you happy when you are acting like a passive aggressive little asshole?
/r/askTRP10/09/14 12:39 AM
1

I have the same contempt for TRP that I do for any hate group. The things you guys advocate are absolutely disgusting to me, and they always seem to boil down to trust issues and a control problems. But hey, why handle things like an adult when you can dread game?
/r/askTRP10/09/14 12:31 AM
1

Yes, you're cynical. And paranoid at that. You must not be in a very good marriage if you have to "keep your wife busy" so she won't cheat on you.
/r/askTRP10/09/14 12:20 AM
1

The data you are allegedly using to back up your statements does nothing for me unless you cite it. So please, if you're going to make grandiose statements please back them up.
/r/askTRP10/09/14 12:16 AM
0

In the future, if you're going to make grandiose statements please back them up. There are clearly people in successful relationships all around you, and those do not count for nothing just because you're cynical and naive enough to believe what you do.
/r/askTRP06/09/14 07:13 PM
1

That would be a perfect relationship, sustainable only in perfect conditions with perfect people. Unfortunately we live in the real world, and in the real world, systems break down over time, people change and shit happens. Can you be more specific? I've met people who are in healthy relationships; and I would consider myself to be in one right now. In any case, I don't understand why the relationship that "works" is always the one that never ends. If I've managed to be with someone for whatever…
/r/askTRP06/09/14 07:10 PM
1

Yes they do. This sub is specifically for the purpose of asking questions in the hope of convincing its subscribers. Beneath the subscribe button, it refers to the people here as "48 people swallowing the red pill right now"... as in you're expecting people who come here to be convinced. You guys endlessly post "field reports" in the main sub, which are wholly about convincing people; to add grounds for the red pills claims. Funnily enough, you guys dismiss self-reported studies as bullshit beca…
/r/askTRP06/09/14 06:53 PM
1

You could say that about any ideology. "Oh, you don't believe black people are inferior to white? I guess you're just not open minded enough to join the KKK." You're asking me to take your word and not think about it. That's not being open; that's being foolish.
/r/askTRP04/09/14 06:00 PM
0

This is so ridiculous. I thought this sub was the place I could ask you guys questions, but all I did is ask "why" and you guys cower and dodge my questions and accuse me of "ruffling feathers". Grow the fuck up.
/r/askTRP04/09/14 05:51 PM
1

Ok, just did. I still have the same questions... and I thought this was the place to get them answered. Now... can you back any of your statements up? You're just asking me to take your word that AWALT, but I'm asking you why that is. I'm not a child; I won't take your just because you are the one saying it. I need you to elaborate your points.
/r/askTRP04/09/14 05:49 PM
1

How am I ruffling feathers? You said women don't have to be financially stable, and I asked you why that is. That's not ruffling feathers; that's me asking you to elaborate your assertions.
/r/askTRP04/09/14 05:35 PM
1

Stop being childish and answer my questions. I thought this was what this sub was about. If it bothers you that I call it blood sucking, then I'll rephrase my question: What about a relationship model in which there is reciprocity between partners, but no dependency?
/r/askTRP04/09/14 05:32 PM
1

Why would a woman not have to be financially stable? If women don't have to be financially stable, why would they need to pursue their bb for their financial security?
/r/askTRP04/09/14 05:21 PM
1

I submit that the reason you're sexually frustrated is because your entire paradigm about how relationships work is getting outdated. Women have increasingly more agency, and most do no need to derive security nor provision from anyone else. Maybe the reason you're coming behind is because you're trying to ride a horse-drawn coach in a world of automobiles.
/r/askTRP04/09/14 06:17 AM
1

You're the one who said that you get into relationships "to get something out of" someone else. How are your relationships going? Anything you want to talk about here? Fantastic, thanks for asking. But that's probably because I admire my girlfriend and all her accomplishments... I'm not with her just to have sex with her, or for her to clean my house, et cetera.
/r/askTRP04/09/14 06:04 AM
1

As for being a parasite, I have the choice of leaving But your partner doesn't, because she "get[s] her provision and security from a relationship" with you. my fate isn't connected to my hosts. Neither is the fate of most parasites, considering they often kill their hosts. You seem to like to argue a lot. Instead of shooting up posts with angry criticism in an attempt to bait us into debate, you should try expressing your views. I'm not angry. I just think all your arguments are stupid.
/r/askTRP04/09/14 05:56 AM
1

I don't think the issue at hand is about reciprocity. The problem is a relationship model in which women are dependent on men. Women get security and provision from a relationship. ^ That's what's fucked up. What about a model in which both partners can provide for themselves, and neither sucks out the other one's blood?
/r/askTRP04/09/14 05:52 AM
1

Wouldn't "all people want financial security" be a better statement? If so, then why is there practically no dialog on women being their own source of financial security? Why are they always expect to be secure as a product of being with men?
/r/askTRP04/09/14 05:34 AM
1

What about men? Don't men want security too? Why do you speak like this is about gender difference?
/r/askTRP04/09/14 05:32 AM
1

TRP teaches us not to expect anything from women, but instead helps shed some light on their mating strategies and motivations. Isn't it more likely that any motivations discussed in the red pill are simply the red pill's own construction? "Beta Bux" are men who women 'settle' for to gain relationship security. They are not necessarily the most attractive or valuable in her eyes, but as options dry up, they are often the best remaining choice for a relationship. That's a very cynical (and naive)…
/r/askTRP04/09/14 05:02 AM
0

Women aren't criticized for pursuing bb, AWALT Yes, they are. Have you ever been to /r/theredpill?
/r/askTRP04/09/14 04:57 AM
1

If it's not a tenet of TRP, why is there a sub called "Red Pill Women" that specifically caters to women who stay at home and are submissive to men?
/r/askTRP04/09/14 04:55 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter