TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

candyman420 Archive

View 4 posts and 457 comments by candyman420 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

No, this is why. Globally. https://i.imgur.com/8BRrwhB.png
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/20 09:29 PM
3

That's exactly right, and absent fathers.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/20 09:28 PM
10

Then I’ll explain it for him. Black people would have a lot less trouble in this world from racism if they got their shit together. What do I mean by that? Half of all crime in the US is committed by black people, yet they are only 13% of the population. Curb your thug culture significantly and then the cops will start to be less trigger happy and unfair. The conditions of their job is what creates the prejudice. There. I solved it. Any questions?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/08/20 05:22 PM
1

This feels like a troll, there are little clues and patterns in it that seems to me like a woman wrote it.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/06/19 10:48 AM
82

That pleasant door chime keeps going off, like scoring points
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/19 08:55 PM
6

I don't know who hurt you This is trash. Under the category of “things that only a woman would say”
/r/PussyPassDenied28/04/19 03:55 PM
1

Except for the really extremely mentally disabled all homeless people should be rounded up and thrown in jail for a MINIMUM of 90 days. Fuck, wouldn't that be awesome. Treat them like prostitutes
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/19 05:26 AM
6

Where do you think all of those calories end up?
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/19 05:20 AM
8

I just fucking said that I'm no defender of Cheney, do you read? Why wasn't the dude standing behind the shooter? I question everything that doesn't sound right, I don't care who it is.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/19 09:43 AM
0

Sure, but was he standing where he wasn't supposed to be standing? Generally speaking, you are supposed to stay behind the shooter.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/19 09:42 AM
12

It's kinda like when Dick Cheney shot a guy in the face and the guy apologised I'm no defender of Cheney, but didn't the guy walk in front of his shot? An apology for that seems reasonable
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/19 09:00 AM
1

Aww, did you just try to insult me with wit? That was cute. The point stands. Rude jackasses get thrown out, and it's about time. CNN as an organization has not been revoked, they have lots of other capable reporters that know how to be respectful. You aren't seeing this issue for what it really is.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/11/18 12:04 AM
1

And yet, none of this holds any water against my original point, that Accosta is a grandstanding jackass who frequently goes far beyond "asking questions like a journalist" and tries to have DEBATES with the person standing at the podium. Are you thick? This simple fact flies past you or are you only stubborn? Freedom of the press is important, and the last I heard CNN has over 100 other people with credentials. This is not about locking out CNN, this is about rightfully throwing Accosta's ass o…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/18 10:06 PM
1

I am so fucking shocked. Fox news supports the president and the administration because they are ideologically aligned, and CNN does not. Let me lie down so that I can fully ponder the gravity of this amazing revolution you have brought to my attention.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/18 09:47 PM
1

You're purposefully misinterpreting a journalist repeatedly asking a question That isn't what he is doing, watch the clip again. He is trying to have a DEBATE with the President, as if they are sitting down together in an interview. If you can't see this, there is no hope for you. I may be persuaded to get into the substance of what was discussed, but first you must acknowledge that Acosta is a rude jackass. I understand that you can't agree with any of this because it takes your mind to uncomfo…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/18 01:37 AM
1

Ahahahaha. Watch the video again, then watch all of the other press conferences.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/18 01:17 AM
1

This is not about politics, as I keep trying to tell your dumb ass. REGARDLESS of the content of the issue, if you ask your question and the person behind the podium moves on to another reporter, your turn is up. Are you fucking stupid? What part of NYA NYA I GET TO KEEP TALKING ANYWAY is acceptable to you in any social setting?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/18 01:04 AM
1

The discussion here is about a journalist being a journalist and that some grabby intern was denied when she tried to stop a journalist doing his job Nope, the discussion here is that a jackass continues to behave like a jackass, and he was finally kicked out for being a jackass too many times. I am sure you're the type of person who tries to inject politics into everything in life. I pity you.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/18 12:58 AM
1

Your stupid ass obfuscation and your cute little nicknames have zero sway in this discussion. You are pathetically trying to move the goalposts constantly and I'm not falling for it, I am laughing at you. Seriously. Here is, once again, the boundary of my discussion with you: When those vultures in the press stop asking questions respectfully and keep trying to start having DEBATES with the people behind the podium, BELLIGERENTLY, and you can't see this, regardless of political orientation, you'…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/18 12:42 AM
1

Oh here we go with the whataboutism. DURRR "But what about Trump!!." What a predictable tactic. Your heels are so firmly dug into the ground thinking this is another petty partisan battle, and I'm not falling for it. Get the fuck outta here with this trash. You don't get to shift the goalposts. It doesn't matter who was standing at the podium, There is no bubble from my perspective. Acosta is a dick who deserved to get thrown out. That's all I'm talking about. Stay on topic, or go away.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/18 07:24 PM
1

You can't see out of your own bubble and refuse to recognize bad behavior, regardless of political affiliation. Got it
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/18 04:27 AM
2

Stop projecting your fucking stupid ideology on to me and watch the press conference again carefully. Acosta wasn’t trying to ask questions, he was trying to DEBATE with the president. That’s another thing. That’s not journalism anymore. Learn the difference.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/18 12:01 AM
5

You aren't going to succeed in trying to make this political. I don't give a fuck what you think about Trump or anything like that, I am not speaking to you on that level. The fact is that people like Acosta are rude jackasses, they are not far removed from the papparazi. They act this way on purpose to try and get a rise out of people and provoke them into creating headlines and controversy. I am sorry you seem to be too politically blinded by ideology or stupidity to clearly see this. If it we…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/18 03:55 PM
9

Nope, try again. I've watched the press conferences, and there is always some goddamn asshole trying to get 2 or 3 follow up questions, even when the person at the podium calls on others, THEY STILL WON'T SHUT UP and keep badgering relentlessly. And listen to the way they all scream like banshees the second after the president finishes talking around a world leader. Vultures they are. They deserved to get called out for it. You're the ignoramus that is so blindly partisan that you make excuses f…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/18 08:21 AM
14

His job is to be respectful of the other reporters in the room, not to be a grandstanding jackass.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/18 05:23 AM
13

Except when you look at Acosta's history of being belligerent and rude as fuck, all the time, in every press conference. I can't exactly blame the president for being short with him.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/18 03:25 AM
16

Dude, all politics aside, that Acosta guy is a fucking choad. He is obnoxious and belligerent as fuck, I don't care if you're left or right.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/18 03:23 AM
1

Money isn't everything to all people.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/10/18 09:28 AM
2

You can google search the exact text of the headline in quotes followed by the word reddit, to uncover the people's names who were hidden.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/18 03:57 AM
1

Sex for men is the unilateral penetration of their penis into a woman (or anything else replacing and symbolising the female orifice) I'm so hard RN
/r/MensRights19/03/18 03:24 AM
2

What's known as an internet meme is widely known as something humorous. As below, what you're actually talking about is just an image macro.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 06:11 PM
2

Any image with text on it is called a meme now? It used to be cats and animals with giant print.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 06:32 AM
2

https://youtu.be/BwETZRV0sno?t=368
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/18 07:55 AM
63

This happened on the dutch survivor, and I think it would interest you http://www.returnofkings.com/32053/this-accidental-experiment-shows-the-superiority-of-patriarchy
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/18 06:08 AM
26

“I put hummus on your feet and eat it. I pay extra if you bark for me while in a nun outfit”
/r/TheRedPill19/12/17 10:30 PM
1

Where are the reaction emojis for men?
/r/TheRedPill05/10/17 10:21 PM
1

Wot? The subject has been a school yard tantrum? The subject has been idiotic claims on your part. "Google is dead" which you have not been able to back up with anything but conspiracy theories and out in space bullshit While a lot of people are stupid, few people are that stupid. Learn? Put some goddamn words in the box and expect to get them back. I'm stunned at some of the hits I get from them now. Like, where the fuck did you match this in a top 10? Nevertheless, it was about approachability…
/r/TheRedPill24/08/17 05:01 PM
1

Hater? Do you have blue hair? Hating is for women. Shaming is for women. What are you doing? Do not try to change the subject again. You're a google hater for irrational reasons, and you shame them for irrational reasons. Some people are paid a lot of money to do exactly that. This might be news for you, but some people approach profession decisions by way of objective analysis. Millions of people just use what is convenient. I told you this already. GOOG got eyes because of the simple, approach…
/r/TheRedPill23/08/17 03:39 PM
4

She's 29?? Goddamn, that read like something a teenager might say.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/17 06:31 AM
1

Yes. I said it sucked and you disagreed, thus this part of the thread. And your reason for disagreeing is fucking stupid. You are an emotional google hater. How do you know that? Have you had a team of people with written test cases evaluate it? Now why the fuck would I need anything like that. Jesus. I have my own longtime experience of knowing exactly what I am looking for, and finding the exact answer countless times. And so do millions of other people. Sit on that and rotate. Except they act…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/17 05:08 PM
3

My favorite part was the deep sigh and "OH GOD!" before "neuroticism" flashed on the screen
/r/MensRights20/08/17 08:23 PM
1

That's sort of like saying McDonalds succeeded because people preferred their food over fine dining. No. They preferred GOOG because it's accessibility. They still make it very accessible. The problem isn't their user experience. It is the quality of their search results. A lot of people don't care about this, mostly because they don't notice. What the fuck are you talking about? The quality of the search results. I almost always land on exactly what I'm looking for by the 2nd or 3rd result. Eve…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/17 06:24 PM
1

They tried to sell it though. They failed because it sucked. This is getting repetitive. Oh you're still here. They failed for other reasons. Google would have gone nowhere if the search engine sucked FOR REGULAR PEOPLE. WE AREN'T TALKING ABOUT ENTERPRISE. FOR THE 500th TIME. This is indeed getting repetitive because you're a hard headed ass who hates google irrationally. You added that adjective after things started going sideways for you. Ahahaha, you've got that backwards. My position has rem…
/r/TheRedPill19/08/17 04:29 PM
13

But you don't create a bond with someone else's baby and try to steal it. She should find a new dog
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/17 06:38 AM
1

It's almost willful ignorance at this part. The product is advertising. The platform is search (among others). They cannot sell the search as a product because it sucks. This is easy logic and business. Hey you genius, they don't NEED to sell it. The money is in ADS. The METRICS by which you judge success and failure for a company are screwed up in your brain. Speaking of moving goalposts. Structural changes now? Interestingly, in the day and age of SaaS and PaaS, that's gotten much, much cheape…
/r/TheRedPill17/08/17 08:58 PM
23

Because it's so hard to find a new dog! Shelters aren't overflowing with them waiting to be euthanized or anything like that
/r/PussyPassDenied17/08/17 02:31 AM
1

You could sell it as an enterprise product, like others do. GOOG failed at this because their product sucks. That's been the point all along. Hahahahaha. The money for this particular product is in advertising. Clueless. It's a good thing people like you don't make important decisions. It pretty much makes sense for everyone, particularly when you consider how taxes and expenses are handled with any corporation larger than Joe's oil change shop. This is a business decision, not a technology deci…
/r/TheRedPill16/08/17 05:36 PM
1

Which is a hilarious metric given they don't sell search; they sell ad space which is delivered across the ecosystem. eMarketer? How the hell do you think search is monetized? Use your brain. This isn't 1995. Join us in the wonderful new era where subscriptions roam free on the open internet. Oh the irony of accusing me of falling victim to marketing. No, dumbass, a recurring subscription is not a good fit for every business. There is little value in upgrading Exchange every 3 years. Hardly any …
/r/TheRedPill16/08/17 02:43 AM
1

It isn't growing any more. There is only one way from there. There is a reason why Wall Street analysts are mostly concerned with growth rates. "According to eMarketer, Alphabet Inc owned, Google, will continue to maintain its tight grip on the U.S search market with more than 78% market share. Google's search revenues are expected to grow by 16.7% to $28.55 billion. But yeah, keep cherry picking to convince yourself that "Google is dead." Keep up that echo chamber of delusions. No, you go to CD…
/r/TheRedPill15/08/17 08:04 PM
1

Actually, not really. I gave them a couple years after their IPO to build something new. They didn't. We can go with 23 years if you want, though. It's irrelevant. You think a company needs to make new products all the time to stay relevant. Not advertising tech companies. Their product is AdSense, and there is no evidence whatsoever of any decline. You need to get your head examined. No. They aren't. They bought android. You didn't know this? I'll cut you one slack and tell you that a lot of pe…
/r/TheRedPill15/08/17 03:44 PM
121

Fuck you!
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/17 09:30 PM
1

It's not arbitrary. They have not had a successful indigenous product in 20 years. 20 years is an arbitrary time that you made up, and it's full of shit along with the rest of your points. Google is responsible for Android. That didn't come out 20 years ago, and it's successful. You are irrational and you hate Google, admit it. No. Their success is because of advertisements. Their search engine sucks shit. Their search engine is rather excellent. You can put very vague and obscure queries and us…
/r/TheRedPill14/08/17 06:03 PM
1

Er.. I was mocking your standard. Reread. You said "at least one in 20 years would be nice" , that's arbitrary shit you made up. So the fact that they don't even try to sell it any more isn't evidence it is a failure? That fails even basic logic. It is a success because they lead INTERNET SEARCH. The topic we were discussing before you tried to move the goalposts to ENTERPRISE SEARCH. See? This is beyond laughable. They weren't on top in the late 1990s. Where were you in the industry then? Yep. …
/r/TheRedPill13/08/17 06:11 PM
1

"All of the time"? At least one in the last 20 years would be nice. By whose standard. Yours? Yeah right. I was talking about google product. Their search product is shit, as evidence I pointed out that their attempt to sell THE SAME PRODUCT to enterprise buyers was a miserable failures, even when they removed the annoying ad features. You erected a new set of goalposts right run front of the existing goalposts, Einstein. Ahahaha, that isn't evidence. The search technology is excellent. They cru…
/r/TheRedPill12/08/17 05:59 PM
1

Things have already changed. They haven't had a successful indigenous product since their first. You are repeating the same bullshit that was already debunked. Not every company NEEDS to have new products all of the time. There is no getting through the deeply seated layers of confusion in your brain. No. It is not. The enterprise offerings are a hundred times better, simply because enterprise buyings You can't stay on topic to save your life. Who do you think you're talking to? Moving goalposts…
/r/TheRedPill11/08/17 07:14 PM
1

Or different. Things change. That's why they are here in the first place. Hah! What a gigantic leap it is to go from "Google is dead" to "things could change." The former is your google hatred talking. It is hands-down the best search. Actually, it fucking sucks salt-encrusted donkey balls. GOOG has no interest in the best search engine. It IS the best search. Go back to webcrawler and lycos where you have to use regular expressions and other bullshit to find a needle in a haystack. Regular peop…
/r/TheRedPill10/08/17 09:20 PM
1

You keep improving your product line or someone comes along and takes your market away. No one is going to come along and take their market away unless they can do it better. They have been improving the search algorithms for 18 years. It is hands-down the best search. A simple example of this is that you can ask it vague human questions where Bing will trip up. This has been proven many times. And then there is gmail, Adsense from that too. And that wasn't around in the beginning either. Youtub…
/r/TheRedPill10/08/17 06:04 PM
1

Fine. I'll bite. You are a hamster for trying to move the goalposts from GOOGLE to "I was talking about the other companies." Pathetic and obvious. I'm calling you out for what you are. HP is profitable. You want to tell me it is healthy? So is Yahoo. We aren't talking about HP or Yahoo. They don't sell the same things. Yahoo's search is not on the same level as Google's. Making money today doesn't mean you are making money tomorrow. Who the fuck ever said that, not me. Strawman. I said that the…
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 10:50 PM
1

Oh dear god, I was talking about the other companies, those that went bankrupt. This is the future for google, just as it is for everyone. What a little hamster you are. We were obviously talking about GOOGLE the entire time. The company that makes 100 billion a year in AD REVENUE. So you agree that GOOG cannot survive indefinitely on their ad revenue alone in it's current form? Good. I agree that the goddamn sun is going to explode one day and until then, nobody knows, and it is stupid and fool…
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 10:20 PM
1

But that revenue stream went away. The hell it fucking went away! What are you smoking? Where do you think Adsense revenue comes from? Thinking anything can be permanent is a very blue pill way of thinking. Everything is temporary. I never said that anything was permanent. Re-read my comments. You're a confused man.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 09:37 PM
1

So did every company that has been kicked off the DOW. Not when they're making 100 billion a year. Ok, by your asinine logic we can say that everything is dead too because after a while the sun is going to explode. You're getting there. This is seriously your argument? You're detached from reality on another planet.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 09:15 PM
1

You realize GOOG has hardware products, right? They just suck at it... like Microsoft. The lose money on all of them. Who cares. They have money to burn on failed attempts. The Adsense keeps coming. No product is forever. Period. End of story. Even selling pussy requires frequent churn. Ok, by your asinine logic we can say that everything is dead too because after a while the sun is going to explode.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 08:32 PM
1

Again, google makes almost 100 billion annually from Adsense related products. They don't need to make new products to be successful. What about this is so hard to understand. You can't compare google to a commercial hardware and software company like Microsoft. Maybe you don't understand technology very well.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 06:01 PM
1

Now you're linking to nonsensical bullshit that has fuck all to do with this. If you want to have a discussion, summarize it, I'm not reading all that crap. They have cancer you also claimed. Why don't you elaborate on that, chances are it's your bias talking. If your position is that "ad revenue" isn't forever, yeah, that's gonna be true once advertising ITSELF is dead. It's a stretch and a half to say that they're already dead. You are delusional.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 01:37 AM
1

I see, so they have to be constantly making new products to be successful in your mind. ~80 billion a year isn't enough, they had better be making new products all the time like everyone else! You are clueless. "The will be around for a long time" but "they are effectively dead" in the same breath. Listen to yourself man.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 01:17 AM
1

Yes I did, and you're mistaken. Google's successful product is called AdSense. They don't need to make more.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 07:48 PM
-1

No, billionaires WANT to appease SJWs because they AGREE with them.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 06:26 AM
1

The bot got mad at me for posting a link. Google search for: Huffington gender toy children preference, it should be the first one. Bonus to twist the knife: It's a huffington article.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 06:25 AM
0

Google is dead? You're out of your fucking mind. Their revenue was 89 billion last year, mostly from ads.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 06:23 AM
2

those rules don't apply to google, you're nuts if you think they're on any slow decline over this. The predominant social opinion is that women are poor disenfranchised victims, Obama said it himself, and they are perfectly safe in pushing that agenda.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/17 07:34 PM
4

The culture is too extreme.. But it's good that papers like this are making waves, and a lot of people think the guy has reasonable points.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/17 07:30 PM
2

Somehow, I don't think it will work.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/08/17 06:22 AM
10

I mean have to in the sense that they are a gigantic company in the public eye, and technology companies are supposed to be "leading the world" in every aspect, including cultural.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/17 05:48 AM
6

due to their size, they have to.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/17 03:57 AM
8

They’re universal across human cultures ·They often have clear biological causes and links to prenatal testosterone ·Biolgoical males that were castrated at birth and raised as females often still identify and act like males ·The underlying traits are highly heritable ·They’re exactly what we would predict from an evolutionary psychology perspective And to add to this, male chimpanzees play with trucks and females with dolls and other gender appropriate toys, as you would expect, in study after …
/r/TheRedPill06/08/17 03:52 AM
2

Jan Qui, You cannot stop the disco dance!
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/17 03:18 PM
2

Seamlessly blending 2 tracks in the right key with the right timing with the right "feel", plus EQ and effects is more than matching audio signals.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/08/17 06:39 AM
4

Good DJing takes some skill.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/08/17 05:25 AM
1

Matching a beat is not a transition.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/08/17 05:25 AM
1

No one ever said that producing wasn't harder. Good DJing still takes some skill.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/08/17 05:24 AM
6

You're clueless for thinking that what is necessary to effectively mix songs together seamlessly requires nothing but technical skill. You are basically taking on the position that "all art can be made by computers." Yeah, maybe in 1000 years.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/08/17 01:55 AM
9

You are absolutely clueless.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/08/17 01:34 AM
5

You think security is good EVERYWHERE? lol
/r/PussyPassDenied01/08/17 12:55 AM
8

That was the 3rd time she bothered him
/r/PussyPassDenied01/08/17 12:43 AM
10

Ok, to those watching at home, you have to have a knowledge of EQ, what 2 songs go together, timing, key, frequency collision, etc, and in the old days how to beat-match them before software did it for you... in order to be a good DJ.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/08/17 12:02 AM
11

No one said anything about producing. And yes, if you don't think DJing takes some amount of skill, try it sometime for yourself.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/17 11:29 PM
21

There is skill involved, but not always. And of course they have groupies, and the top ones have net worths into the tens of millions.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/17 08:51 PM
-1

I agree.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/17 06:01 PM
3

Haha. Duplicity, I’m using it right. Duplicity is you dishonestly trying to distort the history of events, and feigning ignorance. Let’s not forget what got you here in the first place. You were triggered because I said women are more prone to irrational behavior. Just look how you came at me. You were so mad and triggered that you told me I needed to seek therapy. How can you enter a civil discussion if you start with condescending bullshit like that? Think about it. The hell did you expect. ha…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/07/17 05:38 PM
3

Beautiful. Your duplicity is preserved forever for the world to see. https://archive.is/dZiGd https://archive.is/RWVD1 https://archive.is/R5prE You wanted to make this personal with me? Enjoy! Why are you ashamed of your career choice? There's nothing to be ashamed of! In first world countries, all food service workers who are not chefs or business owners at your age are too dumb to do anything better, or are under-achieving losers. The only exception is truly desperate people with no better opt…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/07/17 03:16 PM
3

Plot twist: it's Nancy Grace!
/r/PussyPassDenied12/07/17 05:42 AM
2

Uh-huh. Can you bring us some more salsa?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/17 05:46 PM
1

Cool story. Don't forget to refill my drink
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/17 06:03 AM
1

You know exactly what it means.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/17 08:12 PM
4

And people like this girl dialed in with modems to access text-based VAX terminals that were hard to use? Because that's all e-mail "was" in 1991. Windows 3.0 didn't have a TCP/IP stack.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/17 09:06 PM
8

I'm a little hard-pressed to believe that average students like this girl were using e-mail widely in 1991. At that time, it's the sort of things that only the nerds in computer labs were involved with.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/17 08:20 PM
1

hahaha. I order the food, you serve it.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/06/17 07:46 PM
1

"Let's spin what he says about me and redirect it back! That isn't transparent or anything." "I wish I wasn't so predictable and obvious, but I can't help it!" “I see misogyny everywhere because I have a chip on my shoulder. Anytime someone mentions a pattern about women, even if it's true, they are really a misogynist with extreme views and need to be called out by me.” “I can’t argue without heavy use of shaming tactics because I have a delicate ego and I’m never wrong. But even if I’m wrong, …
/r/PussyPassDenied24/06/17 11:50 AM
1

"Yeah, let's call his responses outbursts now! That'll totally work." “Honestly. I see misogyny everywhere because I have a chip on my shoulder. Anytime someone mentions a pattern about women, even if it's true, they are really a misogynist with extreme views and need to be called out by me.” “I can’t argue without heavy use of shaming tactics because I have a delicate ego and I’m never wrong. But even if I’m wrong, I can hamster and twist anything to make me look right. I'm a dishonest coward, …
/r/PussyPassDenied20/06/17 07:23 PM
1

“I can’t believe I’m really a bigot. I've moved from denial to acceptance. I think it’s really true!” “I got up in this guy’s face to call him out, but I’m the one that’s been called out!!” “I can’t make arguments without confirmation bias and false equivalency.” “I lack agency and emotional maturity. I’m trying hard to spin this but the truth is impossible to avoid!!" “Why won’t this guy react to my shaming tactics?? Why doesn’t button pushing work on everyone??” “I gotta keep replying. I’m usi…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/06/17 06:38 PM
1

“What. Did he call me a bigot last time! Am I really a bigot? We’d better look that word up to check.” “a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.” “Whew, that was close. That doesn’t describe me at all. That isn’t why I replied to his comment. I was about to say.” “He’s taught me so much, but I can’t admit that. I better go back to trying to shame him some more. That’s worked so well so far! Can’t give up. You got this. I say that to myself every time I see that orange …
/r/PussyPassDenied18/06/17 04:24 PM
1

"It's not like people can have internet in their pockets in 2017, or they don't work with computers for a living, if someone replies immediately it must mean they sit on the internet 24/7 and do nothing else!! Obsession! Yeah that's what it means!! Right??" "Now he might start replying even faster just to fuck with me." “OMG, who does this guy think he is?? I’ve used every shaming tactic that I can think of, and none of them worked!!” “What now?? Why isn’t he falling for it? You mean I can’t jus…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/17 06:36 AM
1

"Let's tell him he lost the argument the 50th time, maybe if we keep repeating something enough, it'll finally be true!" "Yeah, that'll get under his skin!! We can't admit that we were called out by someone else about false equivalence and confirmation bias. omg no. That would be admitting that we were wrong!" "Just keep your eye on the ball. You got this. Keep saying he was wrong, upset and angry, that way we will keep detracting attention from the fact that we are wrong, upset and angry!" "You…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/17 04:00 PM
2

She's too old for that. Gonna be a crazy cat lady, if she isn't well on her way by now.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/17 05:54 AM
6

Another one? The post-apology apology?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/17 05:53 AM
1

"I'll tell him what he needs again, because I am a psychological expert and people should listen to my opinions!! They matter!!" "This is getting good. Let's make some blind assumptions about a stranger's life we know nothing about because that'll make him really really mad." "God I hate misogynists so much. I've gotta call every single one of them out. Maybe THIS response is the one that will put him over the edge." "Gotta keep replying. I'll win eventually, if he doesn't reply it means that I …
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/17 05:29 AM
1

"I think we've got something here, keep hammering the point about fast responses." "Let's throw in some more condescending faux concern too, it seems to be working!" "And cap it off with a little bit of insulting life advice. That'll get his gears really turning I'm sure!!" "This is gonna be a good one, I can just feel it.." "Gotta keep replying. I'll win eventually, if he doesn't reply it means that I win." :)
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/17 05:14 AM
14

Is her name really "Reality Winner?"
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/17 05:03 AM
25

Gentlemen, this is your chance! Kathy Griffin is single and needs someone to support her! Act now, the rewards will be unimaginable.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/17 05:01 AM
39

I hope she saved her money.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/17 04:55 AM
1

"Hey, I know! I'll wait 5 days and try to shame him for replying fast. Maybe that'll work!" "I really, really hate this guy! It's been over a month, I really need to show him who's boss!" "The condescending, passive aggressive thing doesn't seem to be working. Oh well, maybe THIS time.." "If only I knew more about him so I could find some other buttons to push." "I wish I could make him mad!!" "I'll just keep replying, something is bound to set him off." :)
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/17 04:42 AM
1

Like a child, you have to be told several times. The message was effective, a third party confirmed the legitimacy of it. You lost, YOU had to make this personal, and after the subject ended, I responded in kind. I treat people the way I am treated. Has this gotten through your skull yet. I hope so, it is the last time you will hear it. You are a knee-jerk social justice warrior who lacks advanced critical thinking ability. You think that common and universally understood stereotypes are extreme…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/17 10:21 PM
1

Except when you did it, you were clearly angry. Oh boy. Is this kind of shit seriously all you got? Wow. Thanks for reinforcing the stereotype! I took the liberty of reviewing the entire thread to remind myself of your insanity, and there it was, an intelligent person willing to wade through your pedantic ramblings and take the time to make some keen observations. that's the reason for the 2nd response. There is a very big difference. Consider it an apropos. Serious question time. You didn't und…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/17 05:36 AM
1

:) [–]Mr_d_williams 3 points 10 days ago The majority of people don't have such extreme views First..he's right, second.. that's not an extreme view. It's also doesn't mean that he's not a decent human being that will help a fellow human (or even woman) out in real life. False equivalence I'm afraid. Your confirmation bias is showing.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/17 07:34 PM
1

No, I'm tired of repeating myself for stupid people. We've switched to the only language women like you understand. Childish mind games. You seriously think this was "being called out?" ahahahaha. Hey social justice warrior. I bet you can't give me the last word! I dare you, I double dog dare you!
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/17 07:23 PM
1

Again hope you get the help you need with your issues. I knew it!! Sucker. You are easily baited. I brought that up again in the last post and here you are, seeing if it will stick. Seeing if it will make me mad. Predictable. Fucking hilarious. I can be manipulative too. But I don't reach for that tactic as instinctively as some genders do. Watch this. I dare you to give up the last word in this discussion. I DARE you. So you wear your ignorance proudly. It's not ignorance, buttercup. You can ac…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/05/17 05:58 PM
1

Nope. Once the argument was over, only then did I call you stupid, because that's what you have proven to be. DURING the argument, you tried to make it personal at every step of the way, telling me to "seek help" and similar condescending bullshit. That's the ad-hominem, and it is cowardly, weak, and cheap. My generalizations are proudly stated as such, I'm not painting EVERY person with a broad brush, but the PATTERN of women being more emotional than men has persevered throughout generations s…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/17 09:20 PM
1

The way this has played out has been summarized for you more than once. You can go ahead and run away now and make up whatever story you want in your mind. I said women do a thing more than men because women are more irrational. If you don't think women are generally more irrational, then you are denying hormones and biology. And that is biased, and stupid to say the least.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/17 05:36 AM
1

you have extreme views, even flat out wrong ones, of women in general. Name these views, you coward. The entire reason you chimed in here is that you refuse to believe that on average, women are more irrational than men. Accept reality. Don't be delusional.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/05/17 07:14 PM
1

Still salty huh? I imagine it's quite hard for you to be defeated by a sister. lol It's going to be okay though. Hopefully you learned how to become better at an argument. Stay positive! Trolls gonna troll. Fail. you have extreme views, even flat out wrong ones, of women in general. Name them.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/17 06:57 PM
1

Oh you are still here? I thought you'd have fucked off a long time ago. You didn't answer the questions. Keep the fight going, sister. Stay strong!
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/17 06:54 PM
1

I'm so shocked by your creative flippancy! You know, saying things like that is the fastest way to lose an argument. Your efficiency is admirable.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/17 10:20 PM
1

Oh here we go. The first person is here. Welcome from the Subredditdrama crowd, 14 days later, the sad people who live for drama and mostly gender related issues. Now that that's out of the way, I'll repeat myself. YES, I am aware of the phenomenon of overprotective fathers. Regardless of that group, women are MORE likely to behave irrationally than men, due to their nature, and they are MORE likely to involve the police and complain, for different reasons. They skew the whole picture. Now if yo…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/17 09:55 PM
1

The irony of you telling me how to have discussions on the internet is beyond laughably absurd. Refer again to the hierarchy of disagreements. http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/files/2009/08/disagreement-hierarchy.jpg This is a well-established standard of how adults have constructive disagreements. You have tried to make this personal at every opportunity. When that didn't work, you tried to claim that I had an emotional reaction that never existed. The only thing more fascinating about w…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/17 06:01 PM
-1

You are not capable of having an adult level discussion. Go on, you're being called out and you are failing. Name the extreme view. Just one. I know exactly why you won't do it.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/17 03:16 PM
0

Oh you are still here? What a shock. you have extreme views, even flat out wrong ones, of women in general. So what are they then? Elaborate.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/17 06:27 PM
1

bzzzt. incorrect. try again. Put up or shut up. Name an extreme view that you think I have. You won't do it, because you know you are spewing nonsense and your opinions are actually trash.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/17 07:16 PM
1

AFTER the discussion has ended, it's all fair game. DURING the discussion, it's ideas only. Sometimes I partake in these little discussions. They always go exactly the same way. I make some comments and certain people that have never given the issue any critical thinking respond in knee-jerk ways. I respond with reasoned and well thought-out arguments, then they usually go away. Most people are civilized and know how to talk to people online respectfully. Once every so often someone like you com…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 11:31 PM
1

See everything is a game to you and you just want to win. Nope, you are the one playing games. This was about issues and you've tried to make it personal from the start. Your arguments are foolish so you attack the person. That's the game you are playing, and you are lucky to be getting some of my attention. You keep repeating yourself and keep asking questions over and over and try to deflect an obvious truth in an effort to try and change the subject. I ask questions that you cannot answer, be…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 10:50 PM
1

Ok, I'll play your little game. No wonder you're so upset No one is upset. Keep perpetuating that falsehood. It seems that all you can do is lie and distort. whilst I stayed calm You stayed so calm that you triple-replied the same comment at one point. I wonder how hard you were hitting those keys. you have extreme views, even flat out wrong ones, of women in general Name an extreme view that I have. Name a wrong view that I have of women in general. Go on, give it your best shot.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 07:58 PM
1

Actually, the first thing you did was accuse me of reading hate sites. The subject was never changed, except by you to desperately keep the focus on me. This has been amusing. You are falling squarely into expected behavior again. It’s quite a satisfying experience to watch the gears in your brain turn and unfold your behavior so predictably. I’ll tell you a type of story that has happened countless times throughout recorded history. A man and a woman enter an argument. The man defeats her with …
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 07:20 PM
1

More rose colored nonsense. First of all, I had to define what a stereotype is because you don't understand what a stereotype is. The entire point of this discussion is that women are more likely to freak out and call the police due to the stereotype of women acting irrationally. Second, when people lose on the issues, they resort to personal attacks. This is well documented and widely understood. See the pyramid chart again. Third, let's not forget about some of the laughably absurd idiocy that…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 06:56 PM
1

That's an interesting and colorful version of events that you have painted. Let's instead take an objective look at what really happened. I made a comment about which parent is more likely to call the police. You decided to embark on a social justice tirade and "set me straight", "call me out." As soon as you found that your arguments on the issue alone couldn't stand up to scrutiny, you began peppering your responses with little jabs and insults about "seeking help" and that I have "mental issu…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 06:24 PM
1

You sure do talk a lot of nonsense. Let's recap what you learned yesterday. Stereotypes don't include all people. Ad-hominem attacks are a failing argumentative strategy. I think you've had enough attention.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 06:03 PM
1

I didn't start an issue. I told you that's not how people conduct themselves online in disagreements and then you went off the deep end and claimed I had a deep-seated emotional breakdown over a trivial comment, crying a puddle into the keyboard. Holy fuck, you must be impossible to live with. Go outside of reddit and visit some technical forums and see how people disagree. Only the immature are those who attack each other personally. Lost the argument because of pointing out an ad hominem. lolw…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 03:04 AM
1

Yes, that is how you will justify this exchange to yourself. You came out the winner in your mind. Good job.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 02:45 AM
1

Read again. No one is upset for probably the 4th time I've said it. I don't give a fuck about you or you telling me to grow a pair. People have said worse, and it makes them look even more foolish than you. Once again: You are dumb. This is my conclusion after we have finished the argument. It's not an attack that I have to resort to during the course of said argument.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 02:44 AM
1

Blah, blah blah. That's right, I called you a dummy and stand behind it, because you are a little slow. You don't pay attention to literal words and try to find the subtext in everything. If there isn't subtext, you invent one. Typical and predictable. And I also knew you would react this way to being called a dummy. The difference is that attacking you was never the crux of my position in an argument, while it was the very foundation of yours. Consider it an after-the-fact conclusion. If you do…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 02:39 AM
1

No, dingbat, there is zero emotion involved. I smell a tactic to divert attention away from the fact that you are clueless about how to disagree online. Zero agency, accountability, lots of redirection and blame shifting. You're all by the numbers.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 02:28 AM
1

Hey dummy, I told you I wasn't upset. How many times do I have to repeat myself, honestly. I am explaining online etiquette to you, don't read more into it. Attacking the opponent just means your actual viewpoint is weak. And the number of upvotes represents absolutely nothing except for mob rule, not who is right.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 02:26 AM
1

Don't interject feelings where there are none. I am not personally affected by strangers on the internet. If you were genuinely unaware that attacking the person and not the argument isn't a civilized way to conduct disagreements online, then maybe you learned something new today.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 01:35 AM
1

Name calling is only one step in civility below how you behaved. Here is a chart for your reference: http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/files/2009/08/disagreement-hierarchy.jpg
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 01:16 AM
1

You are wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 01:13 AM
1

In that case, while you have been polite lately, you don't know how to interact with people online in a civilized way. This is the definition of ad-hominem. (of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining. Ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is now usually understood as a logical fallacy in which an argument is rebutted by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person …
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 01:08 AM
1

Oh man, the first question is very revealing about you. The answer is: you don't. You approach a disagreement rationally by compartmentalizing the facts and ideas separate from the individual making them. It should never be personal. That's harder to do in real life, but this is on the internet. It only gets personal when one side gets angry, and starts looking for more ammunition. A way to get even, a way to get under their skin, etc. What I mean by you people are those who don't give issues mu…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:57 AM
5

Yeah, you are displaying obvious traits of an SJW. Thanks for answering the question, this is why I asked it. There are people who will knee-jerkingly call anyone who would dare doubt a woman's claim of being raped as being a horrible rape apologist. Regardless of the evidence. Your honesty is appreciated, but you have tried to do almost exactly the same thing here. You are trying to label me as a hater of women or paint in motivations just because I am saying that women are more likely to act i…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:53 AM
1

You automatically lose when you try to attack the person and not the idea. The things that you people believe in actually fall to dust when they are scrutinized. Your beliefs are built on platitudes. There is genuine misogyny and racism in the world, too much of it. But mis-labeling and knee-jerking reasoned and rational arguments as such, and using tactics like what you have demonstrated- is why you people have very little credibility.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:48 AM
4

You ignored the question.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:45 AM
4

There we go, so your agenda is actually pretty clear. The topic itself isn't what interests you, it's the motivations behind the people making the points. Accurate, right. So here's a well chosen question that is probably in the wheelhouse of a social justice warrior. Does questioning a "rape victim's" account of events make the questioner a rape apologist? Even if the "victim" was blatantly found to be lying in a court of law?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:40 AM
1

Pegged me how? You cannot make stereotypes! Stereotypes are big ideas based on big groups of people. You can only comment on existing stereotypes. For an actual real stereotype to be "made," it would have to be a relatively new life activity, pattern of behavior. For example: Nerds love computers. Computers didn't exist 100 years ago.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:38 AM
1

It's an example to break this discussion down into very simple and non-offensive things. Because offensive things trigger reactions that cloud basic reasoning. I say you don't understand it because you are more likely to associate an idea with an emotion than to just compartmentalize the idea to its facts alone. It's true, right?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:35 AM
2

respectable!
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:33 AM
4

Again, I, me personally, do not have any stereotypes. I only have experience with events and people in life that leads me to conclusions based on how they behave. It doesn't mean that all people in that group behave in that way. I, personally, do not create stereotypes. One person is incapable of creating a stereotype. Not only is this not about me, but you seriously don't understand what the word stereotype means if you think that a person can have stereotypes. So I will pose the question again…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:32 AM
1

"Grow up" - "Grow a pair" That's dismissive, almost insulting. But I'm not reacting to your bullshit the way you are probably used to other people reacting to it.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:28 AM
1

I'm invested in the exchange of ideas, that's as far as it goes, because you are constantly re-affirming the tactics used on the losing end of a discussion.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:28 AM
1

That's a huge leap in reasoning. I have no issue with women loving to shop. I understand it. It's accurate. Why do I have to have feelings about it? Not everything that is processed by my brain has to have a feeling associated with it. I don't think this is something you can understand.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:26 AM
5

Stereotypes are not all ignorance though. You can't lump them all into the same category. Name an example of an ignorant stereotype, what you think to be ignorant, and then name one that you think to be accurate. This could be constructive.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:24 AM
1

I'm not invested enough in this exchange to either like or dislike your answer. But give it anyway, see if it surprises me. The whole "there are 7 billion people, we can't know everyone" demonstrates yet another lack of grasp on the subject matter. Stereotypes are not SUPPOSED to be about judging the individual. You seriously haven't got a clue.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:23 AM
6

We are all stereotypes of some type. But trying to judge an individual based purely on what you perceive to be their "stereotype" is another form of ignorance that I am quite amused, but not surprised, to discover you actually believe in.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:21 AM
1

Ahh, back to the dismissive comments. A pity, you were doing so well. By thinking you called anyone out on this topic is a complete delusion and utter fallacy. I don't remember your answer, but now I know why you are here posting in this subreddit.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:18 AM
1

That's an answer to a different question, about whether or not a given INDIVIDUAL is likely to be irrational or not. That is not what I asked. I asked in GENERAL, which gender is more likely to be irrational?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:16 AM
1

There have been no emotions at play, other than internalized laughter at how point-for-point, paint by the number your tactics at trying to argue with me have been. Bonus for failing to fully understand the subject matter.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:15 AM
5

Your made up psycho-analysis and attacks because you cannot admit an obvious truth. See above.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:14 AM
1

So, given the fact that all people, men, women, kids can be irrational. Let's assume adults and people whose minds have developed. Which gender, generally speaking man or woman, is more likely to be irrational?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:13 AM
2

Haha, you know you aren't right, that's why you keep trying to insult me. Since I have to explain things multiple time for slow people. Stereotypes that are not true are actually not stereotypes, they are MISCONCEPTIONS. Challenge for you: name a stereotype that is not true. This should be good.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:11 AM
1

Now here come the catty one liners.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:09 AM
2

Because everything important in life needs to be understood by people capable of critical thinking. You have demonstrated to be lacking in this skill. When someone says stereotype, you just kneejerk. You make no effort to understand. Typical.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:09 AM
5

Oooh, here come the biases now on your part. The only person ridiculous here is you. The person making shit up is you. I've systematically shot down every tired and repetitive tactic you've tried to use. We've uncovered the real truth here, you are unwilling to admit that women are generally more irrational than men.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:08 AM
1

HAHAHA! Deflection! Kids or men being irrational is irrelevant and does not make women less irrational. We've been through this fallacy of argument already!
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:06 AM
2

Holy fuck. The mental gymnastics.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:03 AM
2

You need to better understand what a stereotype actually means.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:02 AM
2

Dude, you're completely out of your element here. If I have to explain what a stereotype actually means, and that it does not mean all people. Wow
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/17 12:00 AM
2

Nah, your actual interest is in making shit up. Oh, you don't think that's true that women are irrational. Amazing. Do you believe in hormones?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 11:58 PM
2

Haha. I made up no narrative. I told you that some people are more likely to behave a certain way based on who they are.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 11:56 PM
2

LOL. Anything you say going over MY head. Good one!
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 11:55 PM
4

I see, you think you're "calling people out." Making up stories must be part of the fun, right
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 11:54 PM
2

Nah, they are clearly rooted in established behavior. Let's turn the tables. Why are YOU so adamantly hell bent on refusing to admit that women generally act more irrationally than men? I already know the answer, but I'd like to hear your explanation.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 11:53 PM
2

Oh no, belittle is what you have been trying to do constantly, let's not get confused here. See, you're back to making these leaps and assumptions about a person "having issues" because they comment on certain things. Women LOVE to write between the lines and make up their own little narratives and psycho-analyze motivations they actually know nothing about. How's that for a generalization? Because it's exactly what you have tried to do.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 11:51 PM
4

Ahh, so how is one supposed to take a personal attack if not personally? Exactly how I have handled it. Pointing it out for exactly what it is.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 11:48 PM
2

That's a stretch. The prevalence for overreaction will always be with the gender that tends to overreact more. It's really simple logic There will be some fathers who irrationally overreact out of protection, and there will be others (more) who understand that their daughter dating boys is a normal part of growing up.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 11:47 PM
4

Right you are, they are due to many things. However, you are conflating issues again and you are trying to make this personal. Now this will blow your mind. This is not my stereotype. It exists whether I am alive or dead. My personal opinion on it doesn't change the fact that it exists.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 11:28 PM
2

Nope, it's not. But bringing this up doesn't change the fact that mothers are more likely to overreact because that's what women do. Generally speaking. The two things can both be true.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 11:26 PM
2

You know, the one you keep repeating about implying that I am a crazy person that needs therapy. I'm not really offended by this, because I understand it's a typical and predictable sparring tactic from someone with a weak position.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 11:24 PM
2

Generalizations are A-OK to make unless they are proven to be false, in which case they become misconceptions. It's not a misconception that women love to shop.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 11:20 PM
6

I don't need to be an expert on helicopters to understand that the helicopter pilot fucked up by crashing his helicopter into a tree. I don't need to have any personal aversions or biases to discuss stereotypes.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 11:19 PM
1

Good one!
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 11:16 PM
1

Again with the personal attack. Too precious. Yeah, my level. As in probably a decade or two of life experience past you. I'm going to assume you are early to mid 20s, like most of reddit. We won't talk about intelligence, but that's probably a valid assumption based on your lack of understanding what the word stereotype even means. We'll go with ignorance, then, it's kinder. The older you get, the patterns of peoples' behavior become more apparent.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 11:15 PM
1

I'm not harping, I have been talking about stereotypes from the very beginning. That's what this entire discussion has been about, nothing more. Do you finally understand where the goalposts are? They're not moving, quit trying to move them. Oh and cute little jab about touching a nerve, that is not the case, and with comments like that it seems like you are starting to grasp at straws here.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 11:13 PM
6

This is where your position becomes pear-shaped. You cannot twist this around to direct the focus on the person making the argument, that's called an ad-hominem attack. It's a known tactic, I would suggest you stop using it because it tells the other person that you have to "go there" because you can't win on the facts alone. So, again, this is why you're probably not used to having serious discussions like this. Anyone who dares to bring up certain social issues is automatically labeled. It hap…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 11:11 PM
1

Good, you acknowledge stereotypes exist, but you did not answer WHY they exist. We'll get to your example, but first, let's make sure we are on the same page. Women love to shop. Where did that stereotype come from?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 11:07 PM
1

You're not at my level, to be perfectly honest with you. I understand there are other points of view. I am talking about one specific thing that you keep trying to broaden and twist around in manipulative ways. Here it is again, it's very simple. Women tend to freak out and overreact more over stupid matters that should be handled internally and thus are more likely to call the police. The first part of that sentence explains the reasoning behind the second part.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 11:05 PM
4

I feel like we are making progress, but you are conflating separate and unrelated things. We're not talking about ignorant comments, or what people need to do (go to a therapist) who make those comments. We are talking about trends and patterns. Five news articles about this subject of women freaking out and calling the police for their reasons is a pattern. And there are more.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 11:01 PM
1

Boom. You are amusing when you think you have me cornered. Yes, I pointed out the stereotype that mothers overreact, which is based on their PATTERNS of behavior. If you honestly fail to recognize patterns, you are obviously incapable of having a discussion about stereotypes. Nice try again on trying to twist this into the psychology of me.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 10:57 PM
1

No, I am trying to help you understand what we are even discussing and it genuinely seems to be beyond you. Let's go back to this example. Women love to shop. Where did that stereotype come from? Did a sexist misogynistic person make it up and then it just spread from there for no reason?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 10:55 PM
7

There is no backpedalling, I have maintained consistency from the very beginning and you have only failed to understand. I honestly think you need another decade or so of life experience. Whenever a stereotype is mentioned, it is assumed and well understood that means NOT ALL PEOPLE. But, there always seem to be people like you who think that every stereotype is a horrible thing that must be vanquished from society and all people who talk about them are ignorant. The only person ignorant here, i…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 10:52 PM
2

No, YOU are missing the point. Saying that "fathers do it too" does not invalidate the original statement. It just means "fathers do it too." This is a poor rebuttal. And I never said they "always" do. That's an absolute, you can't use absolute statements when discussing generalizations. There is definitive proof of patterns of people behaving the way I have described, I have showed it to you.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 10:44 PM
6

It's pretty clear who I am dealing with. I would suggest you educate yourself so you don't make yourself look stupid. Stereotypes do not mean all people. Again, they are established longstanding factual PATTERNS of groups of people. Do you agree?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 10:41 PM
3

I never said all. You don't know what the word stereotype even means.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 10:38 PM
5

No, that's your bullshit knee jerk psycho-analysis at work. I doubt you have ever given this any semblance of actual critical thought. It is perfectly permissible to talk about things objectively. Your behavior itself is another stereotype. "Man must be talking about women negatively so he must hate women." Transparent.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 10:37 PM
2

Ignorance is a factor in some stereotypes, but not all. That's your problem, you lump all stereotypes into the same category. All right, we'll break this down to a simple example. Women love to shop. Do you agree?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 10:35 PM
6

Oh I see, only I believe in stereotypes because they are all false. Is that your implication?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 10:33 PM
2

Stereotypes are pervasive. Go look that word up. Where do you think they came from?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 10:29 PM
6

This too easy. I'm almost amazed, you seriously still don't understand what a stereotype is? Holy shit. A stereotype doesn't mean that people in a group will ALWAYS behave a certain way, just that they are MORE likely to, on average. That's where stereotypes come from. They are established patterns of behavior over a long period of time. Your brain can't seem to wrap itself around the concept of scale. I feel like I'm in a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 10:27 PM
2

There is nothing to work out. I laid out facts with supporting examples and reasoning clearly explained. You didn't like that so now you are trying unsuccessfully to twist this discussion about me. Good luck with that shit.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 10:21 PM
5

You don't have a point. You are mad because you lost the argument of ideas, so now you are naturally attacking me. Textbook psychology. Another stereotype has been confirmed again. My original statement stands. Women are more likely to call the police in those situations because they are more likely to be irrational and emotionally driven. Anything constructive to add? Any more pedantic, personal and dismissive insults in your arsenal to deploy?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 10:15 PM
5

And now here is the "dismissive ridicule" tactic. When women lose an argument they always try to make it personal.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 10:04 PM
2

Sure it was insult. The only thing that is obvious is your lack of brainpower to understand basic logic, or you are in denial of it.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 10:02 PM
2

Ahh, dismissive insults get you nowhere. Why do you participate in this subreddit?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 09:52 PM
5

They are both stereotypes, and they generalizations. Generalizing a group of people is the same thing as stereotyping. I really can't tell if you are really trying to understand but lack the mental capacity, or you do get it and this is a poor argumentative tactic, probably a combination of both. Here it is explained in yet another way. Both genders behave in a stereotypical and irrational way, that is not in dispute. However, there are certain factors that make one type of behavior more likely …
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/17 09:50 PM
4

This is amazing, and you are such a clever genius for redirecting my own words. Here's the difference between my examples and yours. Men going off the rails was never in dispute or even disagreed upon. There was never a claim on my part about absence of irrationality on the other side. The "father cleaning his gun when the boy shows up" is another stereotype. But police reports for normal adolescent behavior is far less likely from the father for one key reason - pay attention, it may sink in th…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/17 07:11 AM
2

Haha. You said 1 example does not mean there is a pattern, I show you more examples, and now you are back-peddling. Just give up. You have no position. I don't have a "type," and this is not about me. You trying to make it about me is a failure. What a noble princess you are for calling out cunts. Now why don't you call out THESE cunts. There is a pattern of cunts who ruin boys lives because they are irrationally angry for reasons I have explained before. And you think that pointing this out mea…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/17 07:04 AM
2

I was, sorry I didn't fall into line and join you in the blaming women circle-jerk. Pathetic. If you are back-peddling now, it would be honest of you to retract your claim that blaming women is trivialized to a circle jerk. If they overreact and ruin teenagers' lives by involving the police on matters which should be settled internally, you're goddamn right I consider that an irrational overreaction, which they deserve to be blamed for.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/17 10:29 PM
3

No, I got the examples from Google, dingbat. I don't read "hate sites." And your ignorance speaks volumes if you have to call anything that goes against your worldview and opinions as "hate." As far as stereotyping and generalizations go, they happen all the time, it's part of life, they have nothing to do with "issues" or "hatred." They just ARE. Stereotypes: Women love to shop. Men love to build things. Women freak out easily. All true. It's perfectly OK to talk about stereotypes, as long as y…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/17 10:26 PM
1

Hey dingbat, there are lots and lots of stereotypes. We are talking about ONE. We are not widening the goalpost to talk about others, we would be here forever. And what you brought up isn't even a stereotype, it's an extreme racist view. And I'm sure you think that just because I acknowledge that many women freak out easily, that must mean I am a racist too, because you are incapable of understanding that opinions are nuanced and people don't squarely fall into the categories you imagine. It's a…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/17 01:30 PM
2

Four more examples for you, honey. Because women in these situations never overreact. They are never motivated by punishing the boys for being explicit with their precious angels, or ruining their reputations. Oh no, that never happens. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/true-crime/wp/2016/05/26/teen-in-manassas-city-sexting-case-sues-prince-william-authorities-for-civil-rights-violations/?utm_term=.ecb88437f786 "The girl’s mother reported the video to the Manassas City police." http://www.care…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/17 08:15 AM
4

Ok, you can skip everything I wrote when you obviously have no rebuttal. Women freak out more often than men. That's obviously not in dispute. The generalization stands. Why are you even participating in this subreddit?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/17 07:35 AM
2

Does that mean all men act that way? See, you don't seem to understand what stereotyping and generalizations are. Never did I once use the word "ALL" or even imply it. seeing specific stories that fit your narrative There is no narrative. There are patterns that most people don't recognize or unconsciously excuse or dismiss. Why not go to a feminazi site and see their examples of men doing some fucked up shit. That's a red herring, no one was ever trying to claim that people on the fringes of BO…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/17 04:37 AM
3

Who said that's the only example, it isn't. There is more than one prevalent factor to conclude that mothers freak out. Women are more likely to freak out over nonsense in general. They jump on the couch when they see a bug. They say "he is my rock" which means they are allowed (and expected) to lose their shit every so often because they are women, and emotional freakouts are normal. And the man is expected to be the calm and rational voice of reason. Women understand that their daughters have …
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/17 11:23 PM
3

What I said before, and stories in the news like this. Notice who made the call. http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/illinois-teens-charged-as-child-pornographers-in-sexting-case/
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/17 08:48 PM
1

I see, now you are making assumptions and trying to put words in my mouth. This is not how to have a discussion.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/17 12:33 AM
1

Oh, I see. All of a sudden, this random case involving a different matter, sexting, that we had not even discussed at all previously is "the only example we all know about already. LOL. You are so obvious. And hilarious.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 11:15 PM
2

What I personally support is irrelevant to whether or not the stereotypes exist.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 11:09 PM
1

If you were agreeing with me, it was hard to tell, there seems to be a lot of ignorance about stereotypes here, I'm a little surprised.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 08:46 PM
2

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/illinois-teens-charged-as-child-pornographers-in-sexting-case/
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 08:44 PM
1

As true as this is stereotypically That's all I'm talking about, not individual exceptions. People do not seem to understand the difference.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 08:43 PM
1

Wow, you seriously need me to explain this. Here you go, then. Women, in general freak out more than men. Because they are generally more emotion driven. How common is it for them to jump on the couch when they see a bug. How common is it for women to say "he is my rock" - which means they are more free to get emotional and crazy while the man in the relationship tends to be the more rational anchor. You like stereotypes? There you go, have fun. Here comes the part where you tell me "not all wom…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 08:42 PM
2

You people? You mean the people who understand reality and don't try to bury their heads in the sand? Check out this one. And then come back when you read about who reported it. http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/illinois-teens-charged-as-child-pornographers-in-sexting-case/
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 08:37 PM
1

You mean like this source? http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/illinois-teens-charged-as-child-pornographers-in-sexting-case/ The girl’s mother found out about the video, and reported the Twitter post to police, who seized the original recording.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 08:36 PM
1

You mean like this one? http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/illinois-teens-charged-as-child-pornographers-in-sexting-case/ The girl’s mother found out about the video, and reported the Twitter post to police, who seized the original recording. And read the comments regarding the mother. That is exactly what I'm talking about.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 08:35 PM
1

LOL They come from long time established patterns of human behavior. Learn something.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 08:30 PM
2

I need to reference you about a mother freaking out? Because that's so uncommon? Really?
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 02:36 PM
2

Understanding? Read this guy's post for another perspective. https://www.reddit.com/r/pussypassdenied/comments/69gpjq/yet_another_girl_cries_rape_rather_than_admit_she/dh7fl6x/
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 02:35 PM
1

You mean the father who is cleaning his gun when the son arrives? It's a stupid cliche.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 02:33 PM
6

When you send someone compromising pictures of yourself, that's the risk you take. There is only one way this is actually preventable. And it isn't worth ruining a life.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 02:31 PM
2

This was well said.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 02:29 PM
2

Yes, where do stereotypes come from.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 01:56 PM
2

I am telling you the pattern that I have noticed after seeing so many of these cases in the news. It's always the mother that complains to police.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 01:55 PM
-5

How many cases are there in the news about teenagers lives being ruined over stupidity like normal teenage behavior. Read some of them and see which parent is the one that makes the complaint to police. I notice a pattern here.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 01:54 PM
4

Often, or MORE often than a helicopter mom? Ponder that.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 01:52 PM
-9

Sure, that's a stereotype too, but arguably more of a fringe case.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 01:51 PM
1

I don't think you understand how stereotypes and generalizations work.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 01:51 PM
4

Stereotypes do not need a citation, and stereotypes exist for a reason.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 07:53 AM
6

Stereotypes exist for a reason.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 07:52 AM
32

Oh not at all. But mothers ARE more likely to freak out and overreact about stupid shit. They're more likely to want to stick it to the boy and punish him for having the audacity to defile her angel. Meanwhile, the father is more likely to not make a big deal about it, and just accept that sex is normal behavior for teenagers and all part of growing up.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 06:43 AM
185

It's always parents of the DAUGHTERS, isn't it? Like they can't accept reality, that their precious little angel isn't so innocent as they thought. And by parents, I mean the mother.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/17 05:49 AM
2

There is some influence, and it's vastly overstated.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 04:34 PM
21

There are most definitely biological reasons. Women are intrinsically drawn toward activities that involve interaction with people or animals. Motherhood is an instinct. There have been many studies which reveal that baby chimpanzees prefer toys according to their gender. For example. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/24/gender-toys-children-toy-preferences-hormones_n_1827727.html
/r/MensRights30/04/17 05:21 AM
18

There's an evolutionary reason for that which is forbidden to talk about.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 12:15 AM
19

Girls are naturally not interested in boy stuff though, by and large. It has little to do with social influences, that's the great lie that most people believe.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 12:14 AM
2

Do you remember the tape? He said "they let you do it. When they're a star they let you do it." He is referring to one specific type of woman. The gold digging whore. The type that will let rich and powerful men do whatever they want without any hesitation. And it isn't a microscopic group.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 05:52 PM
2

Actually, you need to be aware of the way some type of women act around the rich and powerful.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 02:28 PM
6

You can't harass the willing.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 02:26 PM
7

He said "when they're a star, they let you do it." He was serious and was definitely talking about the gold digging whores.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 02:26 PM
13

"you can go the whole day without texting me huh?" Yes.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/17 04:39 AM
1

You are welcome to disagree, but my position is that no one can REALLY know their spouse, there are secrets for sure that she hasn't told you. No marriage is completely idyllic. Some are more open than others.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 05:22 AM
1

It's not about reading minds.. I'll elaborate more on why it's ok to generalize people - if it's done in the right framework. For example, it's ridiculous to say that ALL people behave a certain way, although there are minimal common traits that all women share, which are unique to them. I'm sure you know what some of those are, even though it's not politically correct to talk about them. It's also true that a man displaying weakness in front of his significant other is more of a deal-breaker to…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 07:12 AM
2

well put
/r/MensRights13/12/16 09:30 PM
1

It is perfectly fine to generalize, and I stand behind everything that I say. Once again, you aren't a mind reader, she can still be caring and loving with no outward indication of how she feels, and you really don't know how she feels when you show weakness.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 09:30 PM
1

You just don't get it. She can say whatever, pretend it's no big deal, still love you and support you, etc, but if you cry and show that level of weakness, you have gone down a notch in her eyes. Now in a small way, she is like your mother. It's also a question of image. What did she in you in the first place? If you were just a pussy in her mind to begin with, then the point is moot.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:15 PM
1

Not in a woman's eyes.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 02:54 PM
1

A vulnerable person who breaks down is not perceived the same way as someone who does not.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 02:42 PM
0

I'm your daddy, and you can trust me.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:42 AM
3

Exactly, and so many man are oblivious to the clues and actions of women. They are left wondering in bewilderment of why she would possibly be driven to cheat, for example.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 01:25 AM
3

Your relationship "cemented" after you broke down because now she has taken on a motherly role, on some level. Trust me, crying is not attractive to her, but she still cares for you.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 01:13 AM
3

Because you know how to read minds?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 01:09 AM
2

high school kids huh. Try giving it some critical thought, try to imagine what you are in your partner's eyes. an unwavering rock or someone that can be easily overcome by emotion just like them? you will go down a notch if you do it, guaranteed.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 11:47 PM
22

Not without the significant other (woman) losing some respect for you. Even if it's never communicated as such.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 09:42 PM
62

You can never confide in a woman who isn't your mother. Ever.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 08:42 PM
9

Begs her for sex? Really? That seems like a bold jump based on the other things you have listed. Has she given it up to him before?
/r/TheRedPill07/12/16 07:26 AM
1

This isn't an echo chamber man, dissenting opinions are allowed. GTFO with this shit. Every point I raised was valid, people have agreed, accept it, and move on. But I'm sure your ego will demand the last word.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/16 05:35 PM
1

The straw man is you trying to peddle the narrative that I don't understand the difference between a sour look and an outright rejection, GTFO. That isn't what this comment thread is about at all. The implication that the OP is making is that EVERY hot girl is on the table, open for negotiation. The ONLY thing I said was, that isn't always the case. If you don't think that needs to be stated, then great for you - fuck off outta here with your arrogant little condescensions. I'll reply to you wit…
/r/TheRedPill03/12/16 08:01 AM
4

I was reading this and thought exactly the same. They are losing their shit because he is breaking all kinds of protocols. Good.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/16 04:36 AM
1

Oh here we go, you're inserting all kinds of straw man bullshit that I never claimed, and trying to argue with me from there. Jesus fuck are you stupid or what. All I have said is that there should be a distinction made between pursuing a target who is playing hard to get - and harassment. Yes, me and all 96 other subscribers who upvoted had a great jerk over it. You even acknowledged this, so we agree, but yet you insist on continuing to argue with me, and making up bullshit that I never said -…
/r/TheRedPill03/12/16 02:21 AM
1

Give me a break with your pretentious bullshit. #1. You approach her, say hi, and she makes a weird face, or pretends to ignore you. That was in the original post. So what happens in the situation where she is out for a walk and wants to be alone with her thoughts because her father just died? Keep trying and she'll crack, right? Fuck outta here.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/16 01:44 AM
1

Get outta here with this bullshit. I said that no acknowledgment was given in the post whatsoever for people who don't want to be picked up. People like the OP think that EVERYONE is attainable with persistence and the right sales pitch. You know, I agree with most of what is said here in terms of understanding psychology and self-improvement, but some of you people are a little bit out there.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/16 01:13 AM
1

Oh for fuck's sake, the OP was framing all of this as if nothing is ever off the table. I said that's not always the case, and people have agreed with me
/r/TheRedPill02/12/16 03:49 PM
1

sometimes people don't want to be picked up That is all that I am saying. It is worth acknowledging. The original post implies that all women are available, all the time, and it's only a matter of using the right angle.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 08:04 PM
3

And the difference between a good salesman and a douchebag is knowing when you are dealing with a 100% no person.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 06:21 PM
2

Come back to earth. The chick who is out on a walk and wants to be alone with her thoughts, maybe cause her father just died isn't going to give you the time of day. NO SALE
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 05:46 AM
-1

See, this is the mentality I'm talking about. You're just a little bit out of touch if you think that all people are open to being sold something, at ALL times. You know sometimes people want to be left alone. In those times they don't want to be shown shit. You're the arrogant fool if you think that all it takes is the right clever angle to reel them in. That's some used car salesman nuttery.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 04:31 AM
-2

people don't really know what they want until you give it to them. While probably true for some people, for others this is insulting.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/16 08:08 PM
16

it's not about being turned off at all, that's what i'm saying. maybe her father died and she's out for a walk, and being seduced is the furthest thing from her mind. I could certainly understand this kind of burden they face from pushy people, at times.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/16 06:11 PM
18

It's a completely incompatible analogy you are pushing. Some people just don't want to be sold, period. That's all I'm saying. You can get their number and come back with another product all you want, and for these people, it will only piss them off more. Persistence is usually good, but the counter-argument in this situation is worth acknowledging.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/16 05:33 PM
15

Yes yes, the point of the post is persistence, that is obvious. But it should be acknowledged that no amount of persistence is going to work on a person that doesn't want to be sold.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/16 05:32 PM
56

Unless you're the type of person that slams the door without a word. Give me a break. Not everyone is the same.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/16 04:55 PM
134

You know, it actually is reasonable to assume that not all women want to be picked up at all times. Your post is good, but leaves no accounting for the fact that some people just want to be left alone.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/16 04:45 PM
1

Everyone has an inner voice that shouts at them to get back in bed when an alarm goes off. The first reason I urge you to become an early bird is because doing so enables you to defeat this inner voice. Defeating this obstacle reinforces the winner’s mindset. Actually, it's only an "obstacle" when you are trying to re-adjust your sleeping patterns. After the adjustment, you don't need an alarm anymore and wake up early naturally. Waking up at at 5 or 6am is going to provide you with so much more…
/r/TheRedPill28/11/16 01:36 AM
1

You say lock her up and you know something about the word email but what was in the emails? Classified information.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 10:54 PM
3

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/11/09/07/3A32024D00000578-3918258-image-a-341_1478675547680.jpg
/r/TheRedPill09/11/16 06:22 PM
78

I knew he would win as soon as I saw him own the stage against those other 13 or so republican choads. He was different, and people are desperate for different. It's a game changer in that politically correct bullshit is finally being countered.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/16 06:01 AM
3

What I found interesting about that woman's story is when she said "she might not have gotten that upset" if he had stuck to the upper part of her body. In this interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HjSg3iFS10
/r/TheRedPill15/10/16 03:55 PM
6

What I found interesting about that woman's story is when she said "she might not have gotten that upset" if he had stuck to the upper part of her body. In this interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HjSg3iFS10
/r/TheRedPill14/10/16 12:42 PM
-5

that's why it's good to be specific. One is racist, the other is a valid and true observation of one segment of one race.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 01:41 AM
-2

However, if I say black people are murderous hood-rats, That would only be racist if you said ALL black people.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 10:53 PM
1

Right, busybody cunt mother that should have minded her own business. Unless their lives are in danger, parents should stay out, teenagers can handle their own problems.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 02:58 AM
1

I mean, the only person whose fault it is that this was taken up as a legal case, is the cop who chose to do so. That's his responsibility, not the mother's or the school's. Uh, no. A cop's obligation is to the law. The law was broken, you can't blame the cop for deciding to do his job. The parents should be wise enough to understand that the law is ridiculous, and to let them settle problems on their own. Kids do this (trade pics) all the time, it isn't felony worthy. You don't go whine to the …
/r/MensRights17/09/16 01:13 AM
1

Yeah she is absolutely a busybody cunt. What the hell is the school gonna do about it? Inform the police and ruin his life. Because they inform the police about everything nowadays. Here's a better idea, kids need to learn early that if they expose themselves to pics, those can potentially get spread around later. Common sense.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 08:45 PM
5

And who got the school/cops involved? The mothers. Always the mothers. These busybody cunts should let kids handle their own problems like this themselves, they are a huge part of the problem.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 03:06 PM
43

Kim's parents first found out about the situation from Austin's mother, who called them to let them know. On May 6, Kim's mother notified Super High School's assistant principal, Bill Punyko, that several boys were circulating sexual pictures of Kim. There are the real problems, right there.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 09:05 AM
1

That's the conspiracy theory. This site would be in serious trouble if it could be proven that there is abuse like that, they aren't stupid..
/r/TheRedPill06/06/16 05:19 AM
3

The admins are never going to get involved to try and correlate you without something seriously illegal going on and a court order.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/16 12:04 AM
1

Do the valets and door men really expect you to tip them for getting out of a cab and walking into the venue?
/r/TheRedPill26/05/16 09:04 PM
17

What goes around comes around? So the off chance that the valet driver has a bad day, or he feels that you didn't tip him "enough" - you think that it's totally justified to fuck that person's car up. And I bet there's no recourse for a complaint, either. Sorry sir, you do deserve $20 for driving my car into a fucking parking space and back, my mistake.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/16 08:04 PM
26

Some guys I work with would even do stuff like park the car and turn the front tire all the way to the left and jam it against the parking block to throw off the alignment. Jesus fucking Christ, the limits of scumbag douchebaggerry in the human race never cease to astound me. I'm not ever using valet again.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/16 06:51 PM
3

you are the winner today
/r/MensRights22/05/16 04:58 AM
12

What is the dog's role in all of this?
/r/MensRights21/05/16 11:22 PM
1

They are obviously one person bathrooms, so who cares.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 01:31 AM
-1

Guys watch porn to see the girls; the male porn guys should be largely invisible other than seeing their schlong violating all of the girl's holes. I remember the 90s porn I used to watch with long close-ups of the dude's face while he was blowing a load.. haha really?
/r/TheRedPill21/03/16 02:51 PM
1

Suffering builds character!
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/16 07:58 AM
8

but the floaty ambient music bed in the background makes it all okay
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/16 07:45 AM
5

Bitching about privilege in general is stupid, everything is relative. We all work with the cards we are dealt.
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 01:55 AM
1

It's all relative. Do you live in a first world country? Do you have electricity and indoor plumbing? Or do you live in a mud hut in Uganda, where the warlords will be coming to burn down the village and cut off your heads.
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 01:32 AM
5

I'm trying to figure out what could drive a self-respecting man to seek superiority over teenagers. He never compared himself or grown men to them. He compared them to each other.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/16 07:54 PM
1

I liked that video, they should do the same social experiment with a 50 year old fat guy and see how many of them laugh then?
/r/TheRedPill24/02/16 05:25 AM
4

I wouldn't be happy at all to listen to that voice every morning when I wake up.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/16 06:19 AM
-2

Nah, from a user standpoint, none of that matters, in a closed environment. The program just needs to do its job. That's really its only purpose.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 11:49 PM
1

I would say it's good if it is efficient, not buggy, and doesn't crash.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 11:21 PM
1

He is cutting and pasting. He takes one word out of my sentence, searches for it in an article, pastes that article, and then says NOT PROVED. If you think that's "passion".. holy shit. I don't mind engaging people who seem to actually think. Feel free to read my other threads on this topic. Click on my username, the bot isn't allowing me to send the permalink url to you direct.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/16 01:02 AM
2

And as for prisons - your comparison to cannibalism does not work. Food is an absolute necessity for someone to live. That is splitting hairs. The comparison is very much valid - in extreme conditions, people do things that they normally would not do. And guess what, some of those people in prison were probably closet homos anyway. Human sexuality is a spectrum, no one is 100% gay or straight. Ancient Greece is proof positive that culture, not biology, is the dominant force in determining the in…
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 11:46 PM
1

Kindly keep your little keyboard warrior tone and attitude to yourself, man. Do you understand that this guy kept replying to me with the same ridiculous wall of text to not only my response but with other discussions i was in the process of having with others? He went into my comment history to insert himself. And the responses had fuck all to do with my points. They were "kind of" on the same subject matter. He has a screw loose. I thought Reddit was broken after getting the same message 4 tim…
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 11:38 PM
2

Give me a break. I'm sorry that you don't see that this guy is a nutbag who is just cutting and pasting text without actually understanding the subject matter, almost like a bot. Why should I bother to have a discussion with someone who takes a single word out of my response and pastes something completely irrelevant in response. I said introversion is genetic, and then he pastes some crap about homosexuality being genetic, when I never claimed anything of the sort.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 05:18 PM
2

That's not evidence of anything. By that logic everyone is a potential cannibal too when there is no other food.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 05:07 PM
1

Wow. I said INTROVERSION is genetic, not homosexuality. Enjoy talking to yourself, this conversation is over.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 07:05 AM
1

Growing up in these circumstances might No, you dumbass. That is genetic. Introversion is biological.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 06:57 AM
2

Oh I see, exotic becomes erotic, because millions of children CHOOSE a life of shame and humiliation in the eyes of society and their peers, just to be exotic. uh huh, yep.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 06:46 AM
1

See, you're just laughably confused. The biological nature of human sexuality has nothing to do with political correctness.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 06:42 AM
1

I'm not interested, because this has fuck-all to do with what we were discussing. You're so far out there that I don't think it's possible for you to have a rational discussion with anyone.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 06:31 AM
1

Obviously, you are a few sandwiches short of a picnic.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 06:24 AM
0

Sexuality has nothing to do with social influence, it has to do with biology. Educate yourself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 06:23 AM
2

You're one of those nutbags that sees a conspiracy theory everywhere, I know your type very well. People are conditioned to be gay because of a massive and purposeful plot to destroy the family. Right.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 06:15 AM
1

You're just batshit insane. Two boys raised in exactly the same household with exactly the same stimuli, one is gay and the other is not. What's your explanation for that? Do you think that everyone is born straight?
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 06:11 AM
1

I suppose this place is a melting pot for all kinds of lunacy.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 06:03 AM
2

Repeating the same nonsense does not make it true. Sexual attraction toward objects has nothing to do with sexual attraction of people.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 06:00 AM
2

Are on something dude? You are pasting the same bullshit back over and over again.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 05:32 AM
2

The sexual attraction toward non-living objects has absolutely nothing to do with sexual attraction between humans or animals. This parallel you keep trying to tie the two together with is completely bogus.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 05:29 AM
2

You do know that homosexuality has been observed in animals, right.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 04:52 AM
1

People are not influenced or coerced into becoming gay by any stretch of the imagination, that's the most absurd shit I have ever heard. Modern day "acceptance" is not indoctrination.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 03:29 AM
1

Surely you aren't telling me that every gay person is that way because they were abused.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 03:26 AM
1

If you think that all human behavior is learned, that's pretty out there to say the least.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 01:12 AM
3

If your argument is that homosexuality is caused by "gay propaganda in the media today" - that's pretty far-fetched and insane.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 01:10 AM
2

Incite homosexuality, lesbianism, sexual immorality and perversion These things cannot be incited.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/16 10:23 PM
1

haha, read the whole thread https://www.reddit.com/r/pussypassdenied/comments/400r1l/men_vs_women_moto_x_enduro_x_split_screen/cyu3egx
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/16 02:24 PM
1

But you see, when you deal with vague terminology like "worse" - it depends how you define that. You could be more specific and say that women are "safer" drivers - because they are better at following the rules and not taking risks, but it does not necessarily follow that they are "better" - they tend to do more absent-minded things and lack the control.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/01/16 08:00 PM
1

You have to define "worse," though. Statistically, men speed more, thus the accidents. But, women get into different types of accidents more, like in the parking lot. Does that fall under the umbrella of worse? Last May, a Freedom of Information request suggested twice as many reverse parking errors were made by female motorists on driving tests, in comparison to their male counterparts – 3,367 mistakes against 1,652.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/01/16 07:36 PM
1

Spatial awareness is knowing exactly where your wheels are. Few women seem to understand this, that's why they bang up their mirrors pulling into the garage and shit. So do men And which gender does it more? Exactly. So you agree that men are worse drivers How you define worse. Worse as in making mistakes and getting into accidents? Or being more prone to distractions and not giving the road your full attention.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/01/16 07:24 PM
3

I find all this funny though because men are actually statistically worse driversand as such our insurance rates are higher Exactly, as I said, they're more aggressive, taking stupid risks. Again not at all true, the more you understand how steering, suspension, etc works and what affects it the better driver you will become Please. Don't be ridiculous. Understanding that suspension absorbs bumps has ZERO impact on driving. Spatial awareness is knowing exactly where your wheels are. Few women se…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/01/16 06:59 PM
5

That's funny. Well, first of all, knowledge of the car's inner workings has nothing to do with how well you can drive it. Second, men are "idiots" when it comes to driving usually because they are more aggressive and make stupid mistakes. Women tend to not pay attention as well, are more prone to distractions (texting) - and generally lack spatial awareness.. more fender benders, broken mirrors, etc.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/01/16 06:41 PM
1

lol. then where did the stereotype come from?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/01/16 05:34 PM
2

men have a natural feel for vehicles and machinery as extensions of their bodies. Women view such things as foreign objects. This is why "women can't drive."
/r/PussyPassDenied11/01/16 03:25 PM
2

there are people who simply like talking to salesmen. And, there are people that absolutely fucking hate it.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/16 11:52 AM
2

an end to masculinity LOL
/r/MensRights09/01/16 10:20 PM
4

and this is why. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/list/hollywood-reporters-2014-women-entertainment-754104
/r/MensRights09/01/16 09:31 PM
76

Reply
/r/PussyPassDenied30/11/15 09:19 AM
2

Mr Goolsby said he was at a Capitol Hill bank at around 6.15pm on Monday thinking about whether he needed to use the ATM uhh.. yeah
/r/MensRights16/10/15 08:36 AM
0

Don't confuse the mind with the body.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/15 03:59 AM
2

There are fucking better places to go than India. That part about watching bodies burn in the Ganges? Sounds delightful! Bring the whole family!
/r/TheRedPill03/03/15 12:00 AM
2

since when does IT work require a degree? Shit isn't hard for a smart person to master.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/15 12:16 PM
3

It's very simple. For thousands of years men have had to throw things in order to survive, to propagate our species, while women cared for the family back home. They are not as evolved to be naturally good at certain skills.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 09:39 AM
0

Nah, a masochist would keep doing it over and over. A quest to expose them, sort of like reverse social justice.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/15 09:44 PM
-3

You should gather up everything, and then tell her husband.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/15 07:52 PM
8

There is long way to go. It does prove his point, right?
/r/TheRedPill13/12/14 10:13 PM
2

Berta Lovejoy9 hours ago (edited) As a real feminist and somebody who boycotts the videogame industry, I have to say that this woman is wrong on so many level, it sickens me that she even calls herself a feminist. She doesn't agree with the FACT that videogames are sexist. Females are never given true character in modern videogames, they're only added for sex appeal for the male demographic. Where are the characters like Samus or Zelda these days? Oh wait, the only way a female even makes it in …
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 07:56 AM
1

pro, he timed that perfectly. that's in hungary btw
/r/TheRedPill16/09/14 06:15 AM
9

And afterwards literally "check our privilege:" talk about which parts of our identity give us the most "privilege." I am privileged to not have been born in Uganda where I spend my days in a mud hut fearful of the warlords who will burn our village down and cut off our heads. How about you?
/r/MensRights31/08/14 09:05 PM
10

jesus christ this was a long-winded article.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 11:51 PM
0

What "team" would that be, and why are you responding to 2 month old discussions?
/r/PussyPass06/08/14 08:09 AM
5

You're forgetting also that he is a comic, and he is used to people getting in his face, and responds accordingly. Not only that, I don't see it as frame being broken at all just because he called her out on "dopey dumb dumb talk." Maintaining frame doesn't mean that you cannot get angry and give someone a verbal beat down.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/14 06:07 AM
-1

but 'maintaining frame' is a state of mind which is largely applicable to desirable women, not this banshee. Some people deserve to get a good dressing down every now and then.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/14 03:48 AM
13

Well, I think in that situation it was better to tell her what she needed to hear, especially since he was only talking to a hagwhale.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 09:18 PM
35

I like these too. him vs. a feminist trying to get under his skin. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lXUd7VxuSA And this one vs. an audience member who likes penguins. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IU_3b2_33vI Both destroyed, although the second one probably worse.!
/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 06:41 PM
1

Of course, strategy is an important part of any good game. When watching football though, the pauses always drove me nuts, they'd have a play and then stop. And I don't like commentator announcer guys either!
/r/MensRights18/07/14 09:36 AM
2

You are kind of a dumb shit. With that said, I have tried most sports in my youth. None of them appealed to me. And you know what? I STILL don't care to watch sports on TV, they bore the fuck out of me. It has fuck-all to do with being athletic. I stuck most of my activities out for the entire season. And I was fucking glad when they were over so that I could spend more time on things that interested me. You are making huge assumptions and trying to write between the lines (non-athletic, lazy) a…
/r/MensRights18/07/14 04:09 AM
1

Running around a field over and over to chase a ball is boring. What's so "deep" and "interesting" about it. That's not giving in, that's deciding that there are better uses for my time.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 07:34 PM
8

(this may be a parallel to those nerdy men who fail at traditional manliness and so engage in lots of competitive video games/e-sports/etc. as a substitute good... so THEY can feel like Alpha Male Champions). I would have to disagree with your explanation. People don't play video games because they can't play sports. As a child going back as far as I could remember, I tried every sport imaginable from tennis to competitive swimming, they all bored the hell out of me. I could have been good in at…
/r/MensRights17/07/14 06:32 AM
13

'I just want him to be out and freed,' his daughter told police earlier this year. Then, 'I will be free on the inside'. hahahaha.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 11:32 PM
1

even though you had influences, the underlying factor in your interest is a NATURAL curiosity about things (how stuff works, how to build stuff) - had to be there. This is something that most girls lack except in certain rare cases. Their natural interests are more in line with caregiving and interaction with people. And if you're a woman, you're one of the rare cases.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 07:43 PM
-1

It's these types of natural curiosities that most of them lack. Their brains just aren't wired for it.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 07:50 AM
2

Well, true love is always in the cards, for just about everybody, if you're willing to set your standards low enough.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 12:52 AM
17

"It took you 16 hours to come up with that answer?! "Nah, just a few minutes actually."
/r/TheRedPill28/06/14 06:28 PM
3

If it becomes a problem I'll replace her with someone younger and hotter. No worries. God, they hate this so much. Reading thebluepill is an absolute joy.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/14 05:59 AM
4

It's the same reason that serial killers receive so many letters from women.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 02:57 AM
4

She is talking about "sexual utopia in power" on the sidebar- page 34. These people seem to have no understanding of metaphor whatsoever.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 03:45 AM
-8

don't soil yourself
/r/PussyPass26/05/14 06:32 PM
-8

hah, and where do you think all of these new votes came from? Funny how everything was backwards just a day ago, I wonder why. ;)
/r/PussyPass25/05/14 11:34 PM
-6

This isn't linked anywhere, I don't have any pals in here downvoting. Gerbil, gerbil, gerbil, gerbil. Look at you, you're so adorable. You need so much help figuring the simplest things out. I'm only too happy to oblige. I'm not talking about your literal pals. I mean people who agree with you everywhere on this massive site. It doesn't have to be linked anywhere. This is a completely open topic. All sorts of people can watch this sub and vote who are not subscribed to it. So the first votes and…
/r/PussyPass25/05/14 08:28 PM
-6

people here believe in the 'pussypass', and your post is still highly downvoted Actually, it was fairly well upvoted until the word got out to your subs and your pals started coming in here to downvote. Exactly what I expected to happen, and I seriously do not give a fuck about votes either way. It was fun, as much as this level of mild amusement can be. Oh, and some people actually tried to take your side and argue your points. That didn't go well for them. mocking you in the PMs You got angry …
/r/PussyPass25/05/14 07:59 PM
-10

Oh, you finally made it here! Well, I did leave out the last part because the whole conversation was already 13 pages long and I didn't want to make it too tedious for the readers. There's nothing revealing about it at all, it's just more of the same. Leave it to a woman to read too much into that and draw the wrong conclusion. :) I was indeed mocking him. You were trying very hard to mock me, you mean. I'm sure in your mind you thought that baby-talk advice animals is supposed to be effective. …
/r/PussyPass25/05/14 07:14 PM
0

You clearly think that women are just heartless bitches and guess what that's pretty damn sexist. clearly.
/r/PussyPass25/05/14 12:20 AM
-27

awwww, I debate like a child! It's why the other party starts typing like a child, amirite
/r/PussyPass24/05/14 08:17 PM
-7

Well then, feel free to point out in the report where this is not the case. This paper assesses gender disparities in federal criminal cases. It finds large gender gaps favoring women throughout the sentence length distribution (averaging over 60%) And now you are going to tell me that the report contradicts its own synopsis?
/r/PussyPass24/05/14 07:22 PM
-10

Well there you go. "Females have an advantage in law." Stop right there. The existence of other advantages does not prove that the female pussy pass advantage does not exist. It also goes way beyond law.
/r/PussyPass24/05/14 07:19 PM
-12

The contrary in which, she wasn't trying to 'win' an argument au contraire, she had her claws in big time, she was trying to win. but trying to show someone something which they cannot see Well you see, I've clearly acknowledged the factors where men can get passes, wealth with an expensive legal team being the predominant one. She could not acknowledge the feminine advantage. I suppose you don't think it exists, either?
/r/PussyPass24/05/14 06:05 PM
-12

I think you might have missed the study. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2144002 and her hilarious dismissal of it.
/r/PussyPass24/05/14 06:03 PM
2

He'll still have near a 100% rejection rate, despite possessing all the "correct" alpha traits. Don't think so, confidence is everything, unless you're like morbidly obese with a morbidly disgusting face.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/14 12:53 AM
1

And that implies that you think your roots are considered to be "chains" - and no, in a city of over 7 million people, they aren't. No woman is worth uprooting yourself for. If you want to be closer to a beach, mountains, whatever, that's different.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 11:58 PM
1

You're splitting hairs. The larger point is that it's not necessary to move to an arab country unless you want to date arab women. It's also asinine to uproot your entire life just because of a woman. I think this is a fundamental redpill concept which you have missed, as others have pointed out.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 09:59 PM
1

Not comparable at all, programming my ass. The muslim world may be just fine and dandy if you like living under extremely strict laws, and as long as you aren't gay or a woman. People get stoned to death there for getting raped and shit. And it's not just extremists, that's mainstream culture. Honor killings are still commonplace there, right?
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 06:41 PM
2

huhh huh huuhh "it's a big world you should learn about it" - thank you for patronizing me. You're kind of out there in loony land if you think that men have it so bad here that they need to move to countries with many customs and beliefs from the fucking stone-ages, all because "women are too powerful here." Give me a break. Get your perspective back.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 07:33 AM
14

take the kids to a muslim country where fathers always get custody and where they won't extradite over parental custody disputes, and start over. (I hear Malaysia, Indonesia, and Brunei have great weather and beaches.) Yeah! Just pack up and move to a muslim country! are you for real?...the fuck is wrong with some of you people?
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 04:40 AM
13

Young people, who were supposed to enjoy the excursion to the monastery to take stock of their values and their faith, have preferred to organize group sex. hahaha. Say it isn't so!
/r/MensRights03/05/14 07:22 PM
1

Did you leave her there?
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 01:15 AM
4

Point #2 at the end. Wrong. Everyone should have the right to disconnect.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/14 07:47 PM
2

The red pill: food edition! For people that have never heard of restaurants :/
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 01:16 AM
0

I like it much better, it's sleeker.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/14 02:42 AM
0

Yeah, you "rested" your case by closing with total fabrications of my position. I have systematically dissected your irrational viewpoints, you felt cornered, so in response you had to lie. How typical and predictable. In your view to discredit what is radical thinking in your mind you have successfully shown your apparent terroristic tendencies and zero care for the process of legislation. Uh huh, "terroristic tendencies" because I stopped to define how various weapons perform and are classifie…
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 03:18 AM
0

but anyone who believes assault weapons are a legitimate term is obviously someone whose opinion is simply not going to change. This is no different than the people of Alaska that feel the need to correct those who use the term "snow mobile" instead of "snow machine." Who gives a shit. Only the gun crowd. The TSA's actions are irrelevant They are very much relevant as an example to demonstrate the concept of deterrent. Thanks for glossing over it. And that's not beginning to see how shocking it …
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 03:00 AM
0

I will start with the TSA thing because it kind of amuses me that I have to explain it to you. I've had this discussion with someone on reddit already before. Putting aside the body-scanning thing aside for the moment, which I think is taking it too far, the new regulations regarding air travel have been incredibly effective deterrents. You know why? Very simply put. Some guys successfully hijacked some planes with box cutters. Now you can't bring box cutters on the plane anymore. Was that effec…
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 02:06 AM
0

The viability is already there. When you buy a gun off the internet you do not receive that gun to your home, you pay the money, give the seller the details of your local FFL dealer, send the gun to your FFL dealer who will not release the gun to you until a background check has been completed. Really? Perhaps you're not aware how easy it is to get around this on armslist.com. Basically, you just have to classify yourself as a "private seller" meaning you are not subject to the same regulations …
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 11:44 PM
1

So what? What's wrong about any of this. People were looking to buy guns? Oh no, the horror! So what? the point of the discussion here is that it's arguably very easy to buy firearms without a background check. Probably even moreso online than at the gun show. No one's really monitoring this. So, to be reasonable we can say: Is it possible to force a background check and registration for a private sale? Probably not. is it possible at a gun show and on the internet? On paper yes, in reality, the…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 10:21 PM
1

I would not call the daily show a news source, but I don't know of anyone else on television that goes to such lengths to scrutinize political leaders and the media, calling out their hypocrisy and nonsense. That's why I watch it..
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 04:22 PM
1

Except there aren't any as I just showed you. Yes there are. And this is just one example: At any given time, more than 15,000 guns were for sale in those states, according to the study, and more than 5,000 of them were semi-automatic weapons. Nearly 2,000 ads were from prospective buyers asking to purchase specifically from private sellers, where no background checks are required. There are many other examples. So, it's still a problem. That's from a washington post article last year. I'll link…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 03:49 PM
1

Right, so there's no real reason against doing so. You're inconvenienced a little bit and are put in some database. You're already in many databases anyway. On the other hand, by owning an assault weapon one has the ability to massacre innocent people, it's just plain common sense that the weapon's origin and owner needs to be tracked. The hardcore criminals will be able to get around anything, however in a population so vast it's not the hardcore criminals that are doing the massacres. It's the…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 03:34 PM
2

Can you elaborate. In what way are they unreasonable?
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 06:23 AM
0

This is not really a feminist issue though, you're seeing it that way probably because feminism is active on your radar.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 10:17 PM
0

That's because your mind has been made up and no amount of logical argument would change your mind. I don't think so. Give me a valid reason that a registry is a bad thing, other than it will inconvenience you a little bit. Not things that are Constitutional rights. By that logic you think constitutional rights = exempt from regulation? How exactly is that? By making guns harder to get for a person that wants to do something bad. It would deter them even if slightly and then they might reconside…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 10:10 PM
1

Except that you are both wrong.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 10:06 PM
0

So what other Constitutional rights do you have to register for? This is not a constitutional issue. Just because it's a 2nd amendment right doesn't make it exempt from reasonable regulations. You know, like the ones already in place, the ones with loopholes. And pray tell who gets to decide who those criminals to be are? I see what you are trying to do, and it's not working. This is not about treating people like criminals, it's about putting the proper safeguards in place to prevent assault we…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 10:03 PM
0

I appreciate the effort, but I'm sorry, I'm not really buying it. I don't really understand how a registry would punish anyone. It might slow things down a bit, but big deal. You have to register to do many other things. The hardcore criminals will always get around laws to be sure, but measures like that to help deter borderline "criminals to be" are a good thing.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 05:32 PM
5

That last sentence is a stretch, you're painting feminism into this issue. Anyway, fast and furious sounds like a BS conservative talking point to me. And yeah, I wouldn't mind having a national registration of firearms.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 05:27 PM
-2

who clearly is a terrible president. feel free to explain that.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 07:16 AM
4

it's a very crass and juvenile show, but I watch it to for his very apt commentary on what the media is bullshitting about.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 07:14 AM
-3

he's a very smart guy, and pointing out all of the bullshit in the media (ahem, fox news) is definitely a good thing to have on TV. Is TRP mostly conservative or something?
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 07:13 AM
8

do you not agree that mandatory background checks are perfectly reasonable? that's mostly what I got from Jon's position.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 07:12 AM
2

Do you honestly think this is a valid comparison to make, or are you just really that stupid?
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 10:06 PM
2

I appreciate the effort, however save the advice for someone that asks for it and/or needs it! I also don't live where there is any shortage of hot women.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 07:54 PM
4

Yes, when one easily has the means one can easily move anywhere. The major obstacle in the ability to re-locate is the ability to find employment and housing.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 06:58 PM
2

You sure are making a lot of assumptions there. What if I am perfectly fine where I am, and I like having all of my shit?
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 06:55 PM
5

Not at all. From a practical standpoint, re-locating to another city is no small task. Sure it can be done, but nowhere nearly as easily as the other guy proclaims.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 06:43 PM
2

Fantastic! So you must naturally conclude that we all have the means to "just move to LA" on a whim. I'm never surprised by the capacity people have to be out of touch.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 05:51 PM
2

Are you some kind of couch surfing hobo? We have assets and jobs.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 05:27 PM
5

Yeah, just move to LA! Because relocating is so easy!
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 05:02 PM
10

TIL: "Hagwhale" lol
/r/TheRedPill12/03/14 11:26 PM
2

Maximizing reddit karma, almost reached my goal
/r/TheRedPill12/03/14 07:43 PM
6

I busted out laughing at the cock block droid part, I don't know why
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 06:42 AM
3

I'm afraid you got me.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 11:51 PM
8

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_XpuL2NqyPso/TENRtSxufzI/AAAAAAAACM0/XwUWvKIS3Do/s400/attraction+triangle.jpg
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 07:28 PM
3

I put her in metal cage now because she chew through wood and escape!
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 07:20 PM
1

I don't have the Internet either, but the Internet has me.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/14 07:01 PM
3

"You're not too good for this cake, are you" Yeah actually, I am. Have yourself a third piece, fatty.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 05:43 PM
7

someone send this to Rachel Maddow
/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 02:32 AM
4

I would agree that he is redpill.. watch this, it's gold- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IU_3b2_33vI
/r/TheRedPill17/02/14 02:53 PM
1

Whenever I read random blog posts and articles linked from the reddit main page, I can also tell quite easily if the author was a woman.. It's pretty easy when you know what to look for.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/14 10:04 AM
1

Spot on about everything except healthy food can still be flavorful and enjoyable to eat, not just for fuel of course.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 09:20 AM
10

so in reality she actually finished over 20 minutes behind him? that's pretty shitty
/r/MensRights19/01/14 11:10 PM
0

please.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 11:14 PM
-5

2. Ask her to make you a sandwich.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 07:45 PM
0

keep your perspective. it's too easy to write-off all good women after reading this subreddit for a while. It's like assuming that everyone is getting murdered all of the time by just watching the evening news.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 07:44 PM
0

you probably misconstrued my levels of blame. It's ultimately the woman's fault for being such a cunt, I'm not implying that the man did something wrong and 'blame' may be a harsh word, but in an extreme example.. as hard as love is.. if I ever come to discover that I'm dating a serial murderer I would find a way to get out.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 01:07 AM
2

Don't be a fucking dipshit. So let's say you meet a crackwhore career criminal hot chick. Do you leave her after finding these little details out, or stay with her because she's hot and you love her and then have 5 children. If the latter, you get what's coming. Common sense.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 07:50 PM
2

Of course I blame the woman, but there is no changing her. I also blame the man for having a child with this woman and not bugging out after the red flags. There are millions of other good women out there.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 07:26 PM
1

by your logic no one should try to avoid traffic accidents because it can never be the "victim's" fault. Look at bad people like a force of nature, you can't change them. Just get out.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 05:51 PM
1

Yeah, or he saw the flags but ignored them because he didn't want to lose her, she was sexy, didn't think he could do better, etc etc, who knows. People seem to forget that there are MILLIONS of other girls out there, it's just a matter of finding another one.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 05:49 PM
33

Why didn't you leave this bitch after the first red flag?
/r/MensRights05/07/13 09:58 AM
1

Unless of course, you have a shred of self-respect and don't want to stoop to their level. Choose your battles and focus on the issues that matter.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 02:06 AM
3

When questioned, cry, whimper, curl up in the corner, rock back and forth What.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 12:36 AM
1

I hope your current girlfriend is cleaner? I often see these walls of text of people complaining about horrible wives and their terrible situation, but it really just comes down to choosing better who you marry next time.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 07:40 PM
1

Here's a wacky idea, invest in a tripod and cheap camcorder, point it at them while you work out?
/r/MensRights31/12/12 11:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter