| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Assuming no "baggage" is associated with it, how many of you care how many sex partners your girl had in the past?Okay fine hahaha my use of never was inappropriate. I exaggerated. Fuck me, right? Men are USUALLY never told they cannot form emotional bonds. Are you happy? Stop nitpicking and look at the big picture. | /r/TheRedPill | 17/05/13 09:11 PM |
| 1 | Assuming no "baggage" is associated with it, how many of you care how many sex partners your girl had in the past?It's funny that since I have had a different life experience from you and have different opinions from you, you assume I could not possibly be a man. You talk about tolerance and being open minded... Give me a break | /r/TheRedPill | 17/05/13 05:16 PM |
| 3 | Assuming no "baggage" is associated with it, how many of you care how many sex partners your girl had in the past?It seems like you missed the point. You said "most people believe X," and directed me to some subreddit that does not really contain very many subscribers and those that do, from what I've seen, are just voicing opinions not facts. My stating that I don't believe "X" (and generally most whom I associate with don't) proves this fact that you believe that sex hurts a person. I mean, my god. It appears that you want to simply drag me down for believing something different from you. That is exactly … | /r/TheRedPill | 17/05/13 05:14 PM |
| 2 | Assuming no "baggage" is associated with it, how many of you care how many sex partners your girl had in the past?Their affection would be meaningful because each relationship is different. And yes, other people may have received affection from them as well in the past, but there isn't one kind of affection in terms of love. This is why I think so many of the users on TRP are younger with very little relationship experience. A relationship is not something with a specific formula, you cannot dissect another persons intentions with something like a number. They may have had feelings for others in the past an… | /r/TheRedPill | 17/05/13 06:05 AM |
| 1 | Assuming no "baggage" is associated with it, how many of you care how many sex partners your girl had in the past?What?? I'm sorry, but no. My girlfriend is a kindergarten teacher, and at her school I have witnessed time and time again girls being punished much worse for acts of physical trouble. If a young girl starts a fight or name calling she is told it is "unlady like" and is punished, while the young boys are allowed to carry on and act like kids because well "boys will be boys." Oftentimes the boys are allowed to act like children and are given a freedom that the young girls aren't because being acti… | /r/TheRedPill | 17/05/13 05:58 AM |
| 3 | Assuming no "baggage" is associated with it, how many of you care how many sex partners your girl had in the past?Well why respond at all if you didn't want an answer? I think you're having too much fun agreeing with each other to accept or even consider any alternative perspectives or ideas. And /u/WeAppreciateYou? Is that supposed to be a jab? Because if you created an account just to be sarcastic that's juvenile and pathetic. | /r/TheRedPill | 17/05/13 05:30 AM |
| 3 | Assuming no "baggage" is associated with it, how many of you care how many sex partners your girl had in the past?Okay, that's fair. This may be true in many cases. But here we go again: I am a man and I find sex with someone I love to be extremely fulfilling on an emotional level. I also don't think that because women on average experience sex on an emotional level deeper than men means that is how they should act exclusively. A woman enjoying sex on a casual, fun level is not wrong, and does not automatically makes her a bad choice for a partner. That is extremely far fetched. I understand that no man wou… | /r/TheRedPill | 17/05/13 05:26 AM |
| 3 | Assuming no "baggage" is associated with it, how many of you care how many sex partners your girl had in the past?I believe you were the one who brought that up, so I voiced my opinion back. That would make you the one who brought up the off-topic subject. Wow. | /r/TheRedPill | 17/05/13 05:15 AM |
| 2 | Assuming no "baggage" is associated with it, how many of you care how many sex partners your girl had in the past?If you keep referring to women as basic stereotypes you aren't going to find that "good woman," because any self-respecting woman will never want to be with a man who has such a fun easy time of labeling people he has never met as "reformed whores," or anything of the sort. My SO is not and never has been a "whore," but I don't need to give you a number to justify my choice. If I love a person for who they are, their sexual past does not matter. You're allowed to have any preferences you like, I… | /r/TheRedPill | 17/05/13 05:13 AM |
| 2 | Assuming no "baggage" is associated with it, how many of you care how many sex partners your girl had in the past?I did not come into this sub with preconceived notions at all, I found this sub completely by accident (I initially thought it was a sub about the Matrix and I got excited, but whatever not the point). And no, I don't believe women are superior, but there is a whole lot of excess on this subreddit. "Lied to?" I don't think so. From birth girls and boys of this culture are taught how to act in accordance with their gender; Men are supposed to be big, strong, and in control; women are supposed to … | /r/TheRedPill | 17/05/13 05:07 AM |
| 1 | Assuming no "baggage" is associated with it, how many of you care how many sex partners your girl had in the past?What if I told you there is more to a person (on a relationship level at least) than the amount of sex they have had in their past. Relationships are about so much more... I tend to think based on some of these statements that much of TRP have not been in many serious ones. | /r/TheRedPill | 17/05/13 03:39 AM |
| 3 | Assuming no "baggage" is associated with it, how many of you care how many sex partners your girl had in the past?I don't believe that to be true, no. I think each individual person is different and generalizing based on gender is ridiculous. | /r/TheRedPill | 17/05/13 03:34 AM |
| 2 | Assuming no "baggage" is associated with it, how many of you care how many sex partners your girl had in the past?Woah now, it's not about kissing ass. It's about being confident and respectful at the same time. I would expect to be respected by these women as well: everyone is entitled to respect from another person regardless of gender. I'm not an especially attractive man, I just treat women like actual people, which is something much of TRP does not seem to grasp. | /r/TheRedPill | 17/05/13 03:32 AM |
| 2 | Assuming no "baggage" is associated with it, how many of you care how many sex partners your girl had in the past?And these standards don't stem from biology, they stem from the culture you live in. We live in a patriarchy (and I'm sure plenty will argue against this but we do). There have been cultures worldwide in which the opposite has taken place: there have been tribes in which men raise children and look after the house (taking the "feminine" role) while women work and manage the "commitment" factor of the relationship. These kinds of cultures are not and have never been uncommon. At first upon findin… | /r/TheRedPill | 16/05/13 11:03 PM |
| 3 | Assuming no "baggage" is associated with it, how many of you care how many sex partners your girl had in the past?I'm a man, and I don't find it that hard to get laid. Really, I don't. This entire subreddit in a nutshell seems to be nothing but men having a hard time getting laid (for what I assume would be personal issues-- have fun trying to find or keep a girlfriend when you clearly don't value the female sex) and blaming women for it. I think you need to grow up as this is so incredibly juvenile. Stop complaining about it being "hard" to get laid as a man: it's really really not. | /r/TheRedPill | 16/05/13 10:53 PM |
| 3 | Assuming no "baggage" is associated with it, how many of you care how many sex partners your girl had in the past?Actually I am a man. | /r/TheRedPill | 16/05/13 10:34 PM |
| 1 | Assuming no "baggage" is associated with it, how many of you care how many sex partners your girl had in the past?Free to hold standards, sure that's all fine and well. All of this generalizing about women who have sexual experience isn't "standards." It's slut shaming. Sure, you may have a preference for women who have had less partners-- that's a personal choice. But stating that it's because if a woman has too many partners she's comparable to a prostitute... That's something completely different. Besides, men are never held to these standards so why should women be? | /r/TheRedPill | 16/05/13 05:36 AM |
| 2 | Assuming no "baggage" is associated with it, how many of you care how many sex partners your girl had in the past?How is that so? | /r/TheRedPill | 16/05/13 05:24 AM |
| 1 | Assuming no "baggage" is associated with it, how many of you care how many sex partners your girl had in the past?That's funny because men who have lots of sex are never said to have the inability to form emotional bonds. Thank you for lowering my faith in men even further. | /r/TheRedPill | 16/05/13 04:27 AM |
| -2 | Assuming no "baggage" is associated with it, how many of you care how many sex partners your girl had in the past?The comments on here disgust me. This is a complete double standard. Comparing a woman who has had a lot of sex to a prostitute is ridiculous, and a woman with experience should not be a negative thing. I'm so sick of men holding women to standards like this. | /r/TheRedPill | 16/05/13 04:25 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter