TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

cantthinkofaname1010 Archive

View 2 posts and 78 comments by cantthinkofaname1010 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Literally every long term relationship is going to be monetary based in some form. Unless the woman has sex with a man despite no prospects of provision, most relationships are a form of "escorting". The currency is just abstracted.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 08:01 PM
30

That's just the experience of average men no matter the age bracket.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 03:10 AM
3

So it's the woman's choice to bring the baby to term despite having an option not to, so it's her sole responsibility. It's both the man and woman's fault for a pregnancy occurring, but there's no inherent cost for a pregnancy occurring besides the price of an abortion. The fact that we no longer live in the Stone Age allows us to separate these two concepts.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:56 PM

There are many avenues for a woman to get an abortion regardless of current political climate. This isn't the Stone Age. If a woman brings a pregnancy to term, this is an easily avoidsble conscious decision that she solely makes. Actually you made a decision every single day until it was too late to not get an abortion. I agree that in most cases the cost for the medication to induce the abortion should be shared 50/50 or taken on by the man. But that's as far as it goes. A man should also have …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 01:30 PM
5

It isn't likely at all and hasn't been common for most of human history. Women aren't attracted to most men. The likelihood of her husband being someone she's attracted to is small. Historically women have built a tolerance towards their significant others but haven't really been attracted towards them. Most women will cheat under the right circumstances. That's why as women perceive themselves as needing men less over the years (Not actually true, the relationship is just abstracted) relationsh…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 01:19 AM
3

Women only drop standards for extremely attractive men. Everything makes sense when viewed through that lens. There's an extreme inconsistency between the experiences of men and what you claim. You only focus on a small portion of men that women drop their standards for.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 11:23 PM
3

Women already commonly have sex with the "wrong" men that do bad things and that's because of physical attraction. Women still instinctually recognize good genetics that would complement their own when they see it and that supercedes everything . "Responsive desire" is a coincidental, mislabeled occurrence that exists due to a lack of physical attraction to any significant number of men. If women found a larger portion of men physically attractive, more parity would be observed in the behavior o…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 09:31 PM
1

I'd say good luck to you as well. If you don't possess the ability to discern inconsistencies with data and observable reality and would rather just appeal to some random authority, then do that. That certainly does fit how a lot of women act.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 08:27 PM
4

No, that's a false equivalence. What the study is suggesting is equivalent to a scenario where the Earth would visibly be entering an Ice Age, yet they're claiming that the heat will reduce the Earth to ash. Again, there's studies that contradict the idea that this is how it works for the majority of women. The only reason this could appear to be the case is because ya'll generally aren't attracted to the men around you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 08:13 PM
2

Responsive desire for women exists no differently than it does for men. It's an irrelevant concept that is more comparable to building a tolerance for someone. Nobody said that men and women aren't dimorphic. Don't know where you got that from. However, it has no effect on arousal levels when a woman is actually attracted to someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 08:01 PM
7

No it hasn't. Women do not act differently than men when they are physically attracted.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 07:26 PM
1

Nope, if a study has no consistency at all with real experience, then it's worthless. There have been many studies, all contradicting each other, all of them contextualizing data to mean what they want it to mean. Studies about sexual behavior are volatile, subject to lies, and rife with implications that can be disruptive to society if acted on. Thus, results are suppressed or recontextualized to be socially acceptable. They are generally not acceptable as truth data. There's nothing special ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 07:20 PM
10

Nope. This is nonsense. "Responsive arousal" is a euphemism for her not being attracted to you. When a woman is attracted to you physically, it's no different than a man's attraction to a woman. They do all of the same "cringe, creepy" behaviors. Arousal in time is not real attraction. It's just building a tolerance.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 06:41 PM
1

The most baffling part of the argument that the statistic isn't bad because women are dating older men is that it somehow changes the reality that the majority of young men still aren't in relationships while most young women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 09:19 AM
0

Most men have much different interests than women. Even with shared interests, a man and woman likely won't enjoy it in comparable ways. There's no reason to be friends with women when men offer better compatibility in that area. It doesn't have anything to do with not seeing them as people. Reality is that men and women are not similar at all outside of the basic surface level desires defined on something like the hierarchy of needs.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 11:30 PM
39

In any space where there are large amounts of men and women, there are very little one-to-one pairings. It will always be the vast majority of women going after a few men, as your example shows. Only in the West do people pretend that women don't behave this way and that most men have fulfilling dating lives. In reality, most women and a minority of men have the most sex and relationships. A large portion of men have inconsistent sex and relationships and are generally used as fallbacks, and ano…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 07:01 PM

Both option 1 and 2 are fine for her. Expecting everyone that is financially successful to be a cassanova is stupid. She's a bartender, so option 2 seems more her speed. The way women like her treat option 1 and 2 is most likely what creates option 3. Just taking a guess here.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 09:02 AM

The only dating markets where men and women have equal authority are in bad economies and war time scenarios where men are drafted en masse and the population of men decrease massively.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:55 PM
1

Not wanting old or obese women doesn't mean that men have high standards. There's nothing inherently special about young, in shape women. That's just average anywhere else in the world. Only in the west is a woman being young and in shape correlated with being vastly above average.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 11:58 PM

Nobody cares about anything anyone says if it doesn't resonate. It isn't possible for red pill grift content to have taken hold if there was no basis in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 11:45 PM
2

She shoulders the consequences whatever that may be as she went through with a completely avoidable decision made of her own volition. I don't think I left any ambiguity in my comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 11:02 AM
0

Seems like a loaded question. The issue based on observation, is usually when women decide to bring a child to term that a man doesn't want. When a pregnancy happens, both parties are responsible. You both made a "bad" decision. However, the choice to birth the child is another decision entirely. This isn't the stone age. With all of the access to safe abortion that's available, getting pregnant and having a child are separate logical consequences, but people like to act like they aren't. Having…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 09:28 AM

Women mostly stay in relationships with a sick spouse due to pragmatic reasons like financial rather than out of the goodness of their heart. And they aren't going sexless while their partner is in the hospital.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 10:34 PM
5

Women with no options date like men. The difference between men and women's behavior stem from when they have abundance. The average man however is going to be more realistic. The average woman is usually only going to be attracted to exceptionally attractive men. An average woman will subconsciously sabotage a relationship with an average man if other options are presented that are better.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/25 09:19 AM
-3

A woman deciding to not work is entirely her choice. A man can't force her to stop working. It's making men pay for a woman's personal decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 03:44 AM
3

There's no reason whatsoever to spend a high amount of money on someone you don't even know and haven't seen before. Makes zero sense, and any woman that says otherwise has nefarious intentions. I'm assuming that "coffee date" not only refers to a literal coffee date, but is also a euphemism for a "low effort" date, which is basically anything that doesn't require high monetary expenditure.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 02:31 AM
25

"Developed" attraction isn't real attraction. That's called building a tolerance.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 04:12 AM
-1

We knew before it was messed up based on empirical observation. We also know it's messed up since an entity that reports on these studies admits to there being foul play in the methodology.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 02:36 PM
0

The methodology in these studies are wrong because once again, women are not treated as having narcissistic traits even when it is blatantly evident. This is supported by the article. That is one of the premises upon which the discussion is based around. A large portion of women possess most traits associated with narcissism in western society especially. Saying that someone has most traits of narcissism but aren't narcissists is a meaningless argument. Studies do not match empirical data in thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 02:03 PM
0

It doesn't say antisocial personality DISORDER. It says that testing misses the ways that an antisocial personality can develop, but that isn't the same as the disorder itself. It only talks about antisocial behaviors in the context of them being part of narcissism.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 01:30 PM
0

I'm not. You said that men are all over the spectrum and have more personality disorders. Even if this is true, you have no evidence that this causes a higher prevalence of narcissism in men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 04:09 AM
0

The first two sentences of the article don't say anything about borderline personality disorder. It's way further down in one sentence of the article. I think you need to follow your own advice before trying to play the role of a pseudo intellectual.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 04:07 AM
-3

The difference is that narcissism is commonly observable in the general population of women. Women display narcissistic traits that just aren't treated as narcissism. The study is one instance of this phenomena being acknowledged. It is just in the context of a diagnosis for BPD, but this has far reaching consequences since it is an example of the bias being evident in the methodology being used to diagnose mental disorders in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 03:52 AM
-6

Being all over the spectrum doesn't mean anything by itself. All personality disorders don't manifest traits such as narcissism.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 03:36 AM
-2

Obviously. Romantic love does not exist in any capacity. Women tend to leech from men without limit then hop on to the next dude. Men are only as valuable to women as what they can provide unless the man is "hot". Men see relationships as a source of consistent sex. That's about it. And he's willing to part with some percentage of his resources to make it work. The negative aspects of the female reproductive imperative tend to be exponentially more destructive though if left unchecked though.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/24 03:43 PM
1

Doesn't track. The women that aren't bullied gain disproportionate benefit. The bullied women are more often than not bullied by the women with privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 09:27 PM
1

That's like saying schools don't benefit anyone since school bullying causes suicides.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 06:48 AM
1

The cause is holistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 06:24 AM
-1

Male suicide is exponentially higher
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 05:27 AM
-1

I know about the study already and already went over the flaws in the methodology.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 10:04 PM
0

They're exhibited by a far smaller percentage of men. Average and below men can't get away with having these traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 09:07 PM
-4

In a sample of a few hundred women throughout the country, the rate of grandiose/exhibitionism was about 90% and exploitative/entitlement was about 70%. That's the results based on me comparing what I personally witnessed to established traits of narcissism. Not in a controlled environment, just out in the wild. Don't know what you're expecting. My study has about as much transparency as the one claiming that men are more narcissistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 06:53 PM
0

90% of women attempt to gain endless validation on social media and in real life. I live in the real world. The behaviors are posting a high frequency of selfies on social media, deleting posts that don't get much engagement, putting their face into pictures where the topic is something else entirely. Needing to be the center of attention in general. Expecting compliments when she thinks she looks good. These are just a few. I'd be here all day if I were to list everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 06:50 PM
0

It's observably the vast majority. Saying anything else is dishonest. Based on what I've witnessed it's close to 90%. Also the result isn't only being measured, the behavior is as well. Some women are obviously more successful than others. The less successful women still exhibit these behaviors though with some degree of success.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 06:33 PM
-2

In a sample of a few hundred women throughout the country, the rate of grandiose/exhibitionism was about 90% and exploitative/entitlement was about 70%. That's the results based on me comparing what I personally witnessed to established traits or narcissism. Not in a controlled environment, just out in the wild.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 06:25 PM
-2

Oops. Though to be honest it's a distinction without difference. These specific men deciding to get a test doesn't mean that somehow the rates of fraud are different outside the sample.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 06:20 PM
0

Women utilizing social media to receive endless streams of validation is looking out for themselves? That's just one example out of many
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 06:04 PM
0

Women are the main benefactors of social media, so yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 05:58 PM
-14

That makes no sense. It's literally just a random sample of a few thousand men. The studies that have ridiculously low estimates are likely all self selected. Most men are terrified of the idea of their partner cheating and a lot would want to live in blissful ignorance.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 10:25 AM
-16

https://www.fraud.com/post/paternity-fraud Close to 50% actually when taken from a random sample of men, not self selected.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 10:15 AM
-8

Don't know how many times I can say that the evidence is empirical. Supporting studies such as the paternity fraud rate and most women having backup men are easily findable with a Google search.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 09:45 AM
-2

The previous post was deleted by mods due to not having the debate flair. This isn't about women looking out for their own interests. The examples that I gave in the OP where I delve into the behaviors according to category gives sufficient detail.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 09:39 AM
2

Men shouldn't commit anything to a women since women have unlimited options. That's pretty much it. Studies show that woman are less inclined to monogamy than men. Hypergamy is too strong an instinct. Imagine how a business contract that reflects the relationship between men and women would look in real life. The woman has infinite options while the man usually has few to none, the woman requires extreme investment from the man that affects his livelihood, yet can end the relationship and get wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/24 07:26 PM
1

You didn't really describe this girl in any real detail. Nothing you said makes her seem different. Being "based" isn't a quantifiable character trait. This is simple halo effect in your case.
/r/AllPillDebate12/11/23 10:37 PM
3

Correct. There's no such thing as love. That's why it baffles me when I see people so angry about not finding relationships when you can just see an escort. People are crying over not experiencing illusions. There isn't a single romantic relationship that can't be boiled down to the superficial, transactional level. This even applies to men and their sacrifices in relationships. Ultimately you just like having sex with someone and if you don't find a particular woman too annoying to be around, y…
/r/AllPillDebate12/11/23 06:48 PM
4

Because humans are slaves to biology and abstract concepts to promote unity like "love" aren't actually real.
/r/AllPillDebate12/11/23 06:38 PM
4

This study is too small, but it corroborates women being more superficial than men based on empirical data. Anything that isn't cute or attractive to them in some way is deemed worthless. This isn't even strictly about dating. Women literally worship cuteness. Men tend to value function along with form, and women tend to overwhelmingly value form.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 03:18 AM
7

If women actively approach you with romantic interest then you're in the top 20%. More like the top 10% but I'm generalizing. I'd say that the 60th to 80th percentile need a strong social circle to get relationships which is still decently looks dependent. This range is where things start going south for men. 50th to 60th percentile men need to put in disproportionate effort in relationships to maintain them. If you're into your girlfriend/wife more than she's into you, then you fall into this c…
/r/AllPillDebate20/10/23 11:55 AM
5

80% of women are only attracted to 20% of men, but that doesn't mean that only 20% of men get dates. It's more like the top 10% of men get exponentially more sex than the bottom 90% and it keeps dwindling down proportionately until you get to the 50th percentile. These are the guys that have to put on theatrics to get women to date them, and they eventually get cheated on. Below the 50th percentile is where men basically get nothing.
/r/AllPillDebate20/10/23 10:35 AM
5

I think it's about 50%. There have been studies sort of related to this and the majority of women have a backup guy that she would have sex with, even married women.
/r/AllPillDebate18/10/23 04:32 PM
1

If she's blind then sure.
/r/AllPillDebate15/10/23 10:08 PM
7

You posted a stat with no link to the research. The stat you posted is strange to interpret without context. For example if 1000 people are married in 2020, 985 couples will still be married in 2021? If that's what it's saying then it's still inadequate research as determining a divorce rate based on a one year timeline makes no sense.
/r/AllPillDebate13/10/23 09:02 AM
19

That's absolutely true. The vast majority of self aware men are not trying to sleep with as many women as possible. They get with the first woman that shows them attention and holds on for dear life. They don't have enough awareness though to realize when their girlfriend isn't actually attracted to them, which dooms the relationship in the future. The divorce rate is 50% with most being initiated by women. Their girlfriend will be the first or second woman that they dated, but the guy will be t…
/r/AllPillDebate13/10/23 08:36 AM
16

All humans choose mates based on animal instincts and cover it up with flowery language like "love". It's all bullshit. Mating competition is one of the worst aspects of the human experience.
/r/AllPillDebate10/10/23 07:00 PM
4

Mid thirties is pretty much when women in their early 20s are going to start seeing you as an old man for the most part.
/r/AllPillDebate10/10/23 05:07 PM
9

I find most of them to be boring and extremely narcissistic. The current woman is the end state of what most humans would be if their character flaws went unchecked. Women have no incentive to develop character because they don't have to. However men enable it, so I can't even blame them exclusively.
/r/AllPillDebate09/10/23 05:16 AM
1

Social media has caused female narcissism to skyrocket. Male sexlessness starts taking off soon after instagram became prominent. There was never a point in history where ugly men had it made, but it was easier to get their need for intimacy fulfilled in the past.
/r/AllPillDebate09/10/23 04:59 AM
3

In terms of sexual relationships, being a woman is a cheat code, no matter the race. Your average run of the mill white dude does not have more sexual access than a black woman. There are advantages to being a white male, but this isn't it.
/r/AllPillDebate06/10/23 10:07 PM
2

You think that black women are bashed by black men for being black? No, they aren't. Black women are at most, less socially advantaged than white women, but don't have it as bad as average men of any race. Can black women get dates and sex whenever they want? The answer is obviously yes. This leads to more opportunities for relationships. The fact that they fumble all the time is irrelevant.
/r/AllPillDebate06/10/23 08:39 PM
10

Black women's issues with marriage are its own can of worms, but their issue has nothing to do with them being unable to find people willing to date them.
/r/AllPillDebate06/10/23 08:16 PM
18

Men simply have it worse overall in the realm of dating than women. Ethnicity is irrelevant.
/r/AllPillDebate06/10/23 07:12 PM
1

I've had success on these sites. You aren't gonna consistently get bombshells in the $200-$300 range. They'll look like average women. If you want a woman that's extremely attractive, get ready to break the bank. It takes a lot of filtering to get through the fake ads, but there are definitely real women there that are at least average looking.
/r/AllPillDebate05/10/23 11:50 AM
2

If you're trying to get something not too expensive, Listcrawler is a good site. A lot of scam ads, utilize discretion. Tryst is also an option but isnt as good as it used to be. Never send deposits.
/r/AllPillDebate04/10/23 11:29 PM
3

"Women express their sexual desires through affairs, not relationships" Yup, correct NSFW https://cheatingwithoutremorse.tumblr.com
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/18 10:53 PM
1

The obvious answer here is that you're ugly and the extent that you're balding is excessive. Women don't like ugly men. This isn't rocket science. You do look like a generic creep. You could lose weight & shave your head or get a hair transplant, but that's the most you can do and I'm not sure that the results will be worth it for getting women. Would recommend losing the weight just to be healthier. Just pay a prostitute.
/r/seduction03/05/17 04:56 PM
1

Logically it's not bad. It's not like people have any non-selfish reason for having children anyway. The child certainly isn't being brought into the world for it's own benefit.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/17 11:12 PM
1

From what I can tell, she wasn't at the correct destination, hence the constant questions. If that is the correct interpretation, then I can understand her position. Though to my knowledge I don't think the driver is obligated to drop you specifically in front of the emergency room entrance upon request, just in the general area of the hospital. There is probably more to the story than what was recorded though since the driver talks about her bad behavior during the duration of the ride.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/16 09:41 PM
1

In Highschool, grades averaged 85-95 in classes with male teachers. 70 and below with female teachers on average. Most of my teachers were female though and I only had 2 male teachers at most every year, so that could skew the data. Always did better with male teachers though. There is a clear bias in general when it comes to grading, but I don't think females specifically are getting the better treatment in that area.
/r/MGTOW04/12/16 06:33 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter