TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

capt-on-enterprise Archive

View 0 posts and 97 comments by capt-on-enterprise on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Nope? Your link reflected exactly what I wrote: “completed suicides differ profoundly by gender with a global average male/female ratio of 2.9:1 (Värnik et al., 2008). Opposite to the rate of completed suicides, females outnumber males with respect to the number of attempted suicides.” Which means females attempt it at higher numbers however males , by choosing more lethal means, are more likely to succeed in killing themselves. It’s a really weird flex to say “less committed to dying”?? “men ar…
/r/MensRights03/01/26 05:27 AM
-4

Where did you get your information from because there are definitely problems in attempting to find any mental health services out there. Not enough professionals available. Full stop. The professionals in mental health realize this problem of not having enough people in the field. And it’s hard damn work. The statistics that always stuck out for me was suicide. The rates were higher for attempting by females but males had higher rates of actual deaths because of the method they used, mainly gun…
/r/MensRights01/01/26 08:58 PM
-1

Interesting article
/r/MensRights01/01/26 05:39 PM
4

As Abby said, mil needs therapy.
/r/MensRights26/12/25 09:51 AM
1

Get a vasectomy. Problem solved
/r/MensRights25/12/25 04:56 PM
3

About the concept? What concept? And you advocate forced marriage? That’s bizarre and problematic
/r/MensRights21/12/25 03:00 PM
2

It’s real and has been documented in several studies over 50 years now.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 02:59 PM
3

The rate of divorce has declined for decades now, it’s the lowest in five decades now. With no fault divorce. https://legalclarity.org/us-divorce-rate-statistics-trends-and-demographics/
/r/MensRights21/12/25 08:16 AM
14

The reason there is a divorce is usually because neither one agrees with the other! And if one disagrees, does that mean there’s no divorce? Seriously?
/r/MensRights21/12/25 06:44 AM
2

By all means, go talk to those men in charge, they made the laws. Then go talk to trump, see how that goes.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 04:33 PM
2

Maybe you should go do to El Salvador and talk to the men in charge and change their laws.
/r/MensRights26/03/25 09:18 PM
-4

Maybe you should go do to El Salvador and talk to the men in charge and change their laws.
/r/MensRights26/03/25 09:18 PM
1

Is there a pediatrician that you exclusively use for your baby right now? Have a discussion with him/her about your concerns and that you DO NOT give consent at all for the procedure. Not sure about the medical board rules on consent in Brasil, so you may need to reach out to more than one doctor. Have your pediatrician put a large note in the chart as well that no circumcision procedure should be done on your baby. Also reach out to an attorney. Do they do free consultations in Brasil? This wil…
/r/MensRights29/07/24 06:57 PM
1

lol, the heritage foundation, the authors of Project 2025, say what now? By their standards victoria, the author in this article here has no rights to any voice anywhere. Sit down Victoria
/r/MensRights24/07/24 04:48 PM
1

Since I “missed it”, What is your point?
/r/MensRights18/07/24 02:23 AM
1

Who knows why she did, there are so many reasons. It’s assuming a lot to think that as you get old, your children are obliged to take care of you. Is that why you had kids or have you even procreated yet? Sounds like you haven’t made that journey at all. I have 2 grown kids and I certainly do not expect them to take care of me. And who is big daddy government? You think Social security and Medicare are what exactly? They are programs you actually have to pay into to receive. Pensions are only av…
/r/MensRights18/07/24 01:58 AM
1

“Ultimately people get away with not having children because someone else has kids on their behalf “ what a strange statement. By “getting away with it” does that mean they should be forced to have children? So these same people have no freedom to choose their own life journey? Ah, the old freedom for me, not for thee. BTW, It’s the overall current social effects that dampen any desire to have children. That was my point. Most that are surveyed relate it is the current economic, social condition…
/r/MensRights17/07/24 04:03 PM
-1

How is one different from the other as the end result is the same?
/r/MensRights15/07/24 04:12 AM
2

People I have spoken with say it’s multiple things, primarily not being financially ready-between not being able to afford a house to health insurance etc and that the world is basically on fire so they do not want to bring children into this world. There are plenty of foster children out there you can adopt. Have you tried to adopt?
/r/MensRights15/07/24 03:24 AM
7

This right here, not continued divisive rhetoric pitting one sex against the other, but treating everyone humanely. With respect and dignity. There will ALWAYS be rude, nasty, obnoxious and ignorant people in both groups. So stop contributing to the hate, walk away from those who trample over your boundaries and live your life to the best possible version of yourself. Tired of the hate and pettiness
/r/MensRights13/07/24 03:34 AM
-2

United States coverture is based in English law. Coverture held that no female person had a legal identity. At birth, a female baby was covered by her father’s identity, and then, when she married, by her husband’s. The husband and wife became one–and that one was the husband. As a symbol of this subsuming of identity, women took the last names of their husbands. They were “feme coverts,” covered women. Because they did not legally exist, married women could not make contracts or be sued, so the…
/r/MensRights26/06/24 06:59 PM
-3

“42% of men who have exited the workforce live with at least one parent, a 2017 Brookings study found.”
/r/MensRights26/06/24 05:20 PM
1

What country do you and your children live in? The laws are different everywhere
/r/MensRights26/06/24 04:45 PM
2

Lawyer will just laugh at that request. So will the judge.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 09:14 PM
1

Again I repeat, there is no true freedom of speech, if you say something derogatory to another, there are consequences. There are LAWS that protect this in various countries however, there are ALWAYS LIMITATIONS on those laws. Now since you are a child, I understand you do not grasp these concepts. It is naïve to believe you can say whatever you wish without something coming back on you. The situation often referenced is yelling “Fire!” In a crowded room when there is no fire. Can you say that? …
/r/MensRights04/02/23 10:30 PM
1

Freedom of speech is not the absence of consequences! Where did you get that idea from?? Go ahead and exercise your freedom of speech to your father and talk smack to him, call him a son of a whore, say degrading shit to him. After you awake from your coma, tell me how your freedom worked!
/r/MensRights04/02/23 09:19 PM
0

Exactly, what law do you speak of here? Do you not understand what “consequences of your actions “ mean? Are you still in school or do you work in the adult sphere? Because it’s concerning that you don’t understand how consequences work. It makes sense only if you’re only 12. Then that’s up to your parents to teach you.
/r/MensRights04/02/23 09:09 PM
0

Obviously you haven’t followed case law. And you’re forgetting there are consequences for your “freedom of speech” drivel
/r/MensRights04/02/23 08:47 PM
1

So I’m curious what do you want to argue/debate about? Without some context, this is difficult to answer
/r/MensRights05/10/22 05:37 PM
0

Equally? No. Does it happen? Yes.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 11:47 PM
1

It’s evidence that should be processed, period. And it’s not. The federal justice department actually had to step in to force those police departments to do their jobs. The victims were shocked to hear that their evidence, the rape kits had not been processed as the Justice dept did reach out to them. Yes, they wanted it done. The cops were just stalling, I guess they didn’t want their friends and family charged with rape. 🤨
/r/MensRights21/09/22 01:41 PM
-1

It’s been reported that many cities have rape kits that have never been sent out for testing. It’s rather easy to google. Across majority of cities to small towns thousand of rape kits just sat, untested. I’d be pissed off to to find out the cops didn’t even send it out for testing. Which PROVES that cops and the justice system doesn’t take this crime seriously.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 05:28 AM
1

You’re forgetting religious beliefs
/r/MensRights10/09/22 06:40 PM
1

I though “incel” was short for involuntary celibacy that was coined by those who live that lifestyle.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:19 PM
-3

So you don’t want to have children. And you just don’t want the responsibility of children ie paying for them or caring for them. I get it. So is your question how do you accomplish that?
/r/MensRights14/08/22 05:50 PM
1

Are you mentally deranged? Go. Away. Clown.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 09:44 PM
0

Well at least you get it, bravo!
/r/MensRights08/08/22 09:35 PM
0

You have difficulty with reading comprehension. So again, good day. Bye. Chão. Auf Wiedershen.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 09:34 PM
0

I paraphrased exactly what those congressmen said. You are so twisted up inside with hate, there is no room for a civil discussion. You go have the day you deserve.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 05:42 PM
0

Wow you just twist words around into a pretzel! WHERE did I say women were the victims? Where? I said you are whining like a victim. Are you a woman, because then that whole bullshit word salad would make sense! I pointed out the obvious on who voted. If that’s disgusting to you, you are a seriously disturbed. Pointing out facts just freaks you out huh? The “white knights” are those bitch boys in Congress. The draft, which hasn’t been used in over 50 years, has been there for one reason, for our…
/r/MensRights08/08/22 03:39 PM
1

Men are equal humans that matter. I believe in parental leave for men, equal child custody, etc, but that doesn’t matter for you, you just make assumptions and make claims like the bullshit about homelessness that I never did. I’ve marched, signed petitions and voted. Have you even seen the inside of a voting booth?? Are you old enough? I’ve married and raised 2 kids, both at college now. And if you actually read about the NDAA, why are you pissed off at me instead of the ones who voted against …
/r/MensRights08/08/22 02:32 PM
-4

Wow, such an angry boi! Go read about the NDAA and how that was voted on! Go direct your anger towards the ones that voted it down. Or froth at the mouth some more about how you’re a victim. Who said I voted for men getting drafted? I vote for an equal selective service, men and women. Dude, you are wound up tooo tight.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 02:04 PM
1

Actually, it’s conservative Republicans that keep voting against it. They just voted against the NDAA portion that included women in selective service. Again. Chip Roy (R) was very vocal against the vote. James Inhofe, Roger Wicker, Tom Cotton, Josh Hawley, and Mike Rounds all Republicans, voted against it and sunk it. 🧐🤨 So your thoughts were wrong.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 01:08 PM
0

I do, clown. But I don’t blame the women for the decisions men have made. The draft hasn’t been enacted since Vietnam war. I believe it would be very unpopular that’s why it hasn’t been done. I believe the conservatives, especially the religious ones, still fight against women serving, because of their beliefs that women belong in the kitchen not the battlefield. And since they hold the majority hold in legislative positions how do you propose to change their minds? I continue to try to vote tho…
/r/MensRights08/08/22 12:42 PM
-5

It’s interesting how many countries actually have the same thing. Many have men and women that actually serve together. However, here in the US it’s funny how there is so many that fight against women serving in any capacity. You do realize that women are actively discouraged from serving, right? Apparently not. I think that anyone who is physically and mentally able should be able to serve in the military. I think that there should be a 2 year requirement for every man and woman at 18 to serve …
/r/MensRights08/08/22 04:55 AM
-14

Enslaved and suffering?? Wow I had no idea I was enslaved!!
/r/MensRights08/08/22 04:37 AM
1

If you are concerned, you should consider free consultations with attorneys first, NOT the police. Let’s face it, any conversation with the police is not advisable as….They. Do. Not. Know. The. Law. Never mind I do not trust them. Old adage, if their lips are moving they are lying. At least an attorney can have your back. My advice, start there
/r/MensRights08/08/22 04:14 AM
5

Yeah, because sexual abuse to any gender is BAD. Does not matter who in doing it ( IMHO child predators should be locked up till they die) any sexual abuse of a child should be punished. Unfortunately, many many have gotten away with it. Religious orders. Sports. Boy Scouts. Teaching. Oh LOVE the politicians that make their excuses. How about just say NO to all of it?
/r/MensRights08/08/22 04:02 AM
-23

So why don’t you lobby the Joint Chiefs of Staff to change that? It appears that women have been fighting to allow themselves into combat roles yet the men in the military have vigorously fought against it. Interesting isn’t it. Also interesting is that the current volunteer force entering military service fail to achieve active status 70% of the time for various reasons. So only 30% actually pass the requirements to enter active military service. 🧐🤨
/r/MensRights08/08/22 03:14 AM
1

Looks like click bait to me.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 11:17 PM
2

That’s subjective
/r/MensRights06/08/22 02:20 PM
1

If women cause more accidents, their insurance rates would go up significantly. Insurance companies use actuarial data to determine this, you know, math? You’re not making sense here, insurance companies are in the business to make money. So they always raise the rates on those individuals that are in accidents more frequently regardless of miles driven. This Malta story is just weird. More men are involved in more accidents…because they drive more??? So bicycle riders get into more bicycle acci…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 02:19 PM
2

Wouldn’t that apply to both sides?
/r/MensRights05/08/22 06:36 AM
1

Almost like collegiate cheerleading right?
/r/MensRights04/08/22 09:55 PM
1

So you worked in IT and nursing?
/r/MensRights04/08/22 09:52 PM
1

For white babies yes, the rest languish in the foster care system. Why else do you think they reversed roe?
/r/MensRights31/07/22 04:13 PM
2

Sounds about right!🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights27/07/22 11:42 AM
3

Your last sentence makes no sense.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 11:25 AM
4

But it’s not the voters that make the laws, it’s the legislative branch, and those legislators made abortion illegal. And seriously, do you think that now it’s illegal in some states that it’s just…going to stop??? It will continue to happen.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 03:55 AM
1

Where did you get these stats from?
/r/MensRights27/07/22 03:51 AM
1

So have you sent a petition to your state representative to end selective service?
/r/MensRights22/07/22 06:45 AM
1

So Thomas should be reporting the issue to HR with specific accounts with times dates and emails.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 08:23 PM
0

Did you mean distinguish between? I’m trying to understand here what you mean. Since you call yourself an egalitarian, I looked up the definition of both, of feminism: 1. a doctrine advocating social, political, and economic rights for women equal to those of men. Egalitarian: Affirming, promoting, or characterized by belief in equal political, economic, social, and civil rights for all people. It seems to have equality as the main point. “..calling oneself a feminist doesn’t make you a feminist…
/r/MensRights11/07/22 08:21 PM
0

“No, feminism has always been a racist, sexist supremacy organization.” Always? All of them? Well, that’s concerning.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 07:31 PM
1

What did you write? Hard to assess without that.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 04:08 PM
1

Yeah, you’re confused. Like I said, good luck with your passions. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 10:09 PM
1

If you have a “passion “ for the military, you would already know the reasons for proper military attire, including hair requirements. I find it strange that you don’t know, however, if you do enlist, you will find out soon enough. Good luck.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 08:35 PM
1

The real issue? That you’re complaining that a job you are CHOOSING to engage in has a policy on the length of your hair? Yes, you’re whining. Everyone that joins has to modify their hairstyle to conform, EVERYONE. But you rather whine like a 3 year old, BuT tHeY dOn’T hAvE tO!! Don’t join, it would be a waste of everyone’s time to deal with a washout like you.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 06:15 AM
1

Consider it a job requirement. Certain jobs require specific attire, hair styles, safety materials worn etc, that must be worn. If you can not adhere to those requirements and specific items for that job, then you cannot work there no matter how much you piss and moan about it. And just a reminder, hair grows back. So when you leave that job, do whatever you want with your hair. Or better yet, don’t even go.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 11:19 AM
1

Anyone who abuses their spouse is wrong. It occurs to many because they are not believed nor acknowledged for many years. How many more have to be injured, maimed or even die before real change occurs?
/r/MensRights29/04/22 03:44 AM
0

Perhaps you need to read it again as well. I wrote “IF” the first time as a possible explanation. No need to get your panties in a twist over an opinion. You wrote “if I ask them, that’s what they give me”. Then have the convo with them to determine what is being perceived. Or not, I don’t give a fuck. You wanted an opinion, I gave you mine. You’re the one getting pissy about it. May I suggest not asking obtuse questions? BTW, having a girlfriend doesn’t absolve you of anything. All kinds of dep…
/r/MensRights17/04/22 01:02 PM
1

You didn’t mention that. Perhaps if You were more clear with your words, a better assessment could be made. Besides, I’m not the only one to point out that could be the explanation you were seeking. You asked, I gave an opinion. Claiming to have a girlfriend changes nothing. If multiple “people” tell you this, perhaps you should talk to them for this explanation. Since it happens “every time”
/r/MensRights17/04/22 12:11 PM
1

Because incels use it frequently when writing about men and females. It’s the mixed use, so if you are talking about blah blah men then blah blah females, that reveals incel speak. IMHO. Either stick with male/female or men/women. I suspect it’s probably not just your use of female but the rest of your dialogue.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 02:41 AM
1

SMH….”want to join for the benefits but not at the expense of my hair” That you don’t understand the traditions nor the difference between the different branches with the additional comical folly of “my hair!”, dude your gonna wash out in the first 10 days! Hair is the least of your concerns.
/r/MensRights12/04/22 02:14 AM
1

Actually that is not true. The insurance actuarial tables that reveal statistically that not only do men have more accidents, have more serious injuries and are also involved with more dangerous vehicles causing said accidents and deaths/injuries. Additionally, men get into more driving under the influence (DUI) accidents, they get more traffic violations, and are more likely to engage in risky driving behaviors such as reckless and aggressive driving. The dummies used in frontal-impact tests we…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:56 AM
1

Pointing out the flaw that a sole business owner is not the same: they put away money for retirement in various ways. What is a living wage anyway? Federal laws had to be implemented to protect workers with Minimum Wage laws. Because companies were taking advantage of working class individuals. Never mind the argument that the minimum wage has not kept up in the past 30-40 years, it actually has been pointed out by several economists that it should be around 20-30 dollars an hour now. But I digr…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 07:47 AM
1

So half the rent about 400-600/month is a livable wage? I can’t stop laughing at this antiquated idea. That labor IS unpaid and unrecognized as it is not counted in Labor Statistics. Nor are they contributing to economy, GDP, social security nor any pension or IRA or unemployment. All this unpaid labor contributes to is poverty, to lower taxes, to decreased GDP. I wonder how well your mother & grandmother are doing financially and how they feel about your ideas of their slave wages. Just so you …
/r/MensRights17/03/22 04:50 AM
1

Cut out the middleman? Who would that be? Are you advocating for the miserable failure called trickle down economics? The lie that keeps being perpetuated today?
/r/MensRights17/03/22 04:15 AM
1

I think it’s ridiculous that basic supplies get taxed like that, it just puts more pressure on those that earn less. Unfortunately we don’t have high priced attorneys to influence lawmakers to tax the wealthy appropriately.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 12:56 AM
1

Is it explained why? You have extrapolate with your own opinions. This report just reveals the income and poverty levels of men and women through a normal lifespan. Just the facts of actual accrued income. “ Statistics alone without knowing the reason is not helping to draw any conclusions “. The reason is to measure poverty by age and sex. I thought the title was clear enough. I’m not arguing anything, just pointing out poverty levels that exist from 1966 to 2014. It exists for various reasons,…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 12:10 AM
2

Depends on the country and their tax rate. I’m trying to understand which country you are referencing because some I’ve seen do not tax soaps nor toothpaste. I don’t think basic supplies for the care of ones body should be taxed. There is also a difference between tax and tariffs. Again depends on which country is involved. What is considered excessive in one may not even occur in another.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 11:48 PM
1

I’m showing you actual statistics. Not feelings and opinions.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 06:43 PM
1

In general, the results of this project showed that women continue to face a disproportionately high risk of living in poverty compared with men. In particular, women age 75 and older and age 25 to 34 remain considerably worse off than their male counterparts. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/blogs/research-matters/2016/04/poverty-by-age-and-sex-an-examination-of-the-distribution-in-poverty-between-1966-and-2014.html
/r/MensRights16/03/22 04:41 PM
0

Conclusion Our review indicates that undernutrition in children under 5 is more likely to affect boys than girls, though the magnitude of these differences varies and is more pronounced in some contexts than others. Future research should further explore reasons for these differences and implications for nutrition policy and practice. This was a meta study. One. And it clearly states that further research is needed. So it’s a weak point with an inadequate study. The wiser cause would be to advoc…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 04:34 PM
1

In that article….. Even in the sample group that showed a similar risk of injury between men and women overall, women were more likely to suffer a moderate lower body injury. IIHS said women were 2.5 times as likely to have moderate leg injuries and 70 percent more likely to have serious leg injuries compared with men. That's a gap that IIHS says could be closed with targeted safety improvements by manufacturers.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 04:19 PM
-1

The first article was a limited study. Using words such as “may, could, perhaps” means they have no definitive evidence. The second one, you referenced Instagram, which is laughable.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 04:11 PM
1

The 5% rate of VAT on sanitary products was abolished on 1 January 2021, with sanitary products now having a zero rate of VAT
/r/MensRights16/03/22 03:58 PM
1

These are comparisons among the same field/industry. Financial advisors to financial advisers not carpenters. They then compare carpenters pay rates. Electricians. Office managers. So your statement is misleading.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 03:54 PM
-1

https://www.business.org/hr/benefits/gender-pay-gap/
/r/MensRights16/03/22 03:45 PM
0

Again very broad. Here’s one from the states. It has actual citations from US Census and US Labor Board On average, men will earn $10,381 more in 2022 than women will across the nation.1,2 Excluding Washington, DC, all states have at least a 10% lower median pay for women compared to men. US Census Bureau, “American Community Survey | S2001 | Earnings in the Past 12 Months (in 2019 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars).” Accessed January 27, 2022. US Census Bureau, “2020 ACS 1-Year Experimental Data Table…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 03:37 PM
0

I don’t think anyone suggested those products be free. You did.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 03:30 PM
0

There is a difference between “pink tax” and tariffs. The pink tax is not an actual tax, but many apparel products designed for women have higher import tariffs than men’s counterparts.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 03:29 PM
1

That is still too broad and vague.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 03:26 PM
1

The difference between the treatment of men and women. Where? In what country? In what areas? Income? Family dynamics? Crime? Housing? Poverty levels? Medical care? Without details on your “infographic” it would be difficult to respond.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 03:26 PM
3

Interesting that The Moneyist pointed out this stat: “Some broader context: A few years ago, Oxfam released a study that estimated women contributed $10.8 trillion to the world’s economy every year in unpaid labor. That’s three times the size of the world’s technology industry.” Whoever stays at home with the jobs of cook, housekeeper nanny etc essentially a “manager” of a household should have recognized labor value whether they be male or female. Not recognizing that harms everyone I think if …
/r/MensRights12/03/22 04:17 PM
1

That was the case in the majority of countries but OP hasn’t really studied history. Sweden was quite progressive as are the other the Nordic countries.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 03:21 PM
2

Is this the betting and gaming company out of Malta?
/r/MensRights12/03/22 03:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter