TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

captain_craptain Archive

View 13 posts and 477 comments by captain_craptain on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
160

captain_craptain/r/MensRights22/01/16 02:37 PM
124

captain_craptain/r/MensRights11/03/16 04:59 PM
74

Blogs/Videocaptain_craptain/r/MensRights20/11/14 04:17 PM
70

Discriminationcaptain_craptain/r/MensRights24/11/15 05:13 PM
28

Reverse Genderscaptain_craptain/r/MensRights12/02/15 05:47 PM
25

Newscaptain_craptain/r/MensRights01/12/14 09:59 PM
20

captain_craptain/r/MensRights19/02/16 05:00 PM
20

captain_craptain/r/PussyPass24/11/15 05:12 PM
7

captain_craptain/r/MensRights14/10/15 08:10 PM
5

Generalcaptain_craptain/r/MensRights10/07/15 07:44 PM
5

captain_craptain/r/MensRights17/03/16 02:47 PM
2

captain_craptain/r/MensRights07/10/16 07:55 PM
0

captain_craptain/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:20 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

https://youtu.be/a6NJitdq8Bk
/r/MensRights28/03/17 08:44 PM
2

/r/iamverysmart
/r/MensRights12/03/17 04:35 PM
1

Per the religion it is not a choice, country law is trumped by God's law according to Koran.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 04:32 PM
1

When did they wear skirts that show off their labia and assholes?
/r/MensRights12/03/17 04:31 PM
1

Which part? How so?
/r/MensRights12/03/17 02:26 PM
1

You do, it just gets rubbed off in your shorts.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:44 AM
1

Makes sense. Thanks
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:43 AM
13

I was calling a pinky toe a flap of skin to draw attention to how fucking ignorant it is to call a foreskin a flap of skin when it ends up being about the size of an index card that gets cut and then torn from the penis. And the definition fits, it is some very serious and irreversible damage. It fundamentally changes your sex organ in a negative way. I'm glad you can anecdotally point out a few ignorant women who like mutilated penises, good for you. Maybe if they don't like how your ears look …
/r/MensRights11/03/17 09:32 PM
15

Can you not read? I said "some odd version of..." As in we currently don't have a catchy term for people who go around acting like they're happy that they were mutilated as a baby and that everything is cool. It's like your embracing the idea that this terrible shit that was done to you was somehow good. "I'm just so glad my parents decided to cut my pinky toes off. Don't need those pesky flaps of skin!"
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:55 PM
22

There are two kinds of people here on /r/MensRights. One fights for men's rights and true equality between men and women, and the other makes exceptions to their principles when it comes to excusing MGM because otherwise they'd have to admit they're ashamed of their weenie and are mad at their parents for being such stupid cunts. FTFY
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:50 PM
2

It's only the people with stupid twats for parents that don't care about their kids well being that are. The trend is way down and in twenty years or so the mutilated penises will be far in the minority.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:48 PM
10

Don't feed the trolls.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:46 PM
5

Cutting your finger nails?!?! You are kidding me... Foreskins don't grow back. Finger nails are heavily made of Keratin, a hard substance also found in hair. When the glans is unprotected it hardens up, dries out and keratinizes. So the only similarity is that a mutilated penis had a glans closer to a finger nail than the soft supple skin that it should be. That had to be the dumbest comparison I've ever heard. Male genital mutilation is catastrophic. You lose 50,000 nerves, stretchy skin, mecha…
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:43 PM
6

Says the guy in favor of chopping and tearing up baby penises.... Yeah, your comment holds zero weight.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:37 PM
13

Yes you probably are and it's likely due to a poor understanding of the mechanics and benefits of a foreskin as well as some odd version of Stockholm syndrome where you're embracing this terrible shit that was done to you because it's easier for your brain to think "yeah, this is what I wanted!" as opposed to having to deal with and process the fact that your parents and other adults fucked your dick up for good.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:37 PM
15

You're more likely to get infected, lose your dick or die if you do get circumcised. Not the other way around.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:33 PM
6

You seem like a fucking idiot. Excusing this shit and even though you won't maim your kids it still sounds like your gonna fuck them up when you pull back their skin too soon. It is barbaric. Period. Nothing makes it acceptable.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:31 PM
7

The foreskin is fused to the glans until much later than 3. Smegma is nothing more than deaf skin cells and oils from your skin mixed together, there is nothing wrong with it, it isn't piss, it isn't an infection. All intact mammals make smegma, including women. Do not attempt to retract a foreskin until it detaches on its own as this is painful and can cause issues.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:28 PM
6

It's not the head that loses it as it isn't that sensitive to begin with. The sensitive part of the organ here is the foreskin itself. The head is severely affected but the loss of feeling comes from losing 50,000 nerves in the foreskin. You lose roughly the equivalent of an index card worth of skin.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:25 PM
6

Should have tried steroid creams and other options before chopping it up. Phimosis can be fixed in other ways.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:22 PM
2

They is not true because the clitoris is analogous to the foreskin, not the glans.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:21 PM
4

Everything.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:20 PM
12

He's just projecting the negative feelings he has about his own penis onto others by trying to declare that being mutilated is superior when that is objectively false.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:17 PM
7

You can argue that all you want, it doesn't make it right or even remotely reasonable.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:16 PM
11

That's a stretch and a poor one at that. We make decisions about their bodies when we are forced to, like if they are sick. But making the decision to arbitrarily remove an integral part of the penis for cosmetic/superfluous reasons is no different than telling a woman what she can or can't do with her body. There simply is no excuse in the world that justifies mutilating young boys in this manner.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:14 PM
3

Of course they are.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 06:08 PM
2

Has there been any confirmation that one of the reasons to circumcise a child is to discourage masturbation? You asked about the historical uses of circumcision. What the goal that some early American doctors sought to achieve by using the procedure on kids was. That isn't an answer that will change with new medical research that comes out today. Pardon my assumption that you want to dismiss the source but if you're really seeking an answer about how much sensitivity is lost quantitatively and q…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 03:50 AM
3

It is very different. That doesn't mean it is any better or worse though. Arguing about degrees of brutality when it comes to how we mutilate one sex over the other is an exercise in banality. It doesn't matter, they're both fucking awful even if they're very different. For example there is a lot more tissue removed on boys over girls. But both are equally vile all the same.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 02:28 PM
9

A contemporary source speaking about the issue you asked about from the time these changes were made isn't good enough for you? When asking about why something happened long ago it makes perfect sense to look at original sources from that time period. To call a source outdated in this sense defies all logic and sense. It seems like you're just looking for a reason to dismiss it.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 02:25 PM
16

Not trying to be mean but how can you prefer it if you don't know the difference? Without a frame of reference it's kind of impossible. I have a friend who got it done at 17 and regrets it every day. He's lost tons of sensitivity and it causes him other problems as well.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 02:22 PM
6

Besides it looks the same once you pull back that protective hood anyways. It serves a purpose. Google side by side images of cut vs uncut. The rich supple skin on the head of an intact man vs the dried out and scaly looking head of a cut man should be evidence enough for any sane person that the foreskin serves a very important purpose.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 02:20 PM
8

It's not healthier by any sense. It risks infection, loss of penis or death in the short term. It guarantees loss of sensitivity and function in the long term. Circumcision will most likely soon be shown as the leading cause of early onset Erectile dysfunction. I could go on in greater detail but I won't because it doesn't seem like it will change your mind.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 02:18 PM
6

Is it really a man? I thought it was a joke.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 04:35 AM
2

Of course not. The key factor here is consent. Regardless of the fact that there's no medical reason for it or that it is the natural state of a penis or that it provides numerous advantages, this all boils down to consent. When parents make medical decisions it is ethical when it is to fix something wrong. There is nothing wrong with being intact and it's way too early to diagnose phimosis. The foreskin is bonded to the glans until much later on and retraction this early is bad.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 02:58 AM
4

OK. But you and I both know that you read the whole thing and have a hard time coming to grips with that information, otherwise you never would have said that. Have a nice weekend.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 01:33 AM
6

The fact that it happened when you were an infant and denied you bodily integrity as well as freedom of choice and you have no frame of reference of what a normal penis feels means that it would be hard for you to realize you've been mutilated. At this point it's all you know so you're cool with it. What you've got to wrap your head around is the fact that a major unnecessary step was taken with no medical benefit. The foreskin is analogous to the clitoris, it is by far the most sensitive part o…
/r/MensRights21/01/17 12:10 AM
3

It won't be long, the trend is reversing by leaps and bounds as the information gets out there.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 11:13 PM
3

Go back to red pill with the rest of the cancer.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 11:13 PM
8

Girls make it too. All mammals do. So do you, it just gets rubbed off in your underwear as the glans of your penis becomes desensitized and keratinized.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 11:12 PM
3

All subjective and all anecdotal, not to mention total bullshit.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 11:11 PM
5

Projecting your insecurities about yourself is not a valid argument.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 11:09 PM
9

You sound like you're projecting.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 11:09 PM
9

Right... Please someone come remove 30000 specialized nerve endings and roughly an index card sized piece of elastic skin that is the equivalent of the clitoris so I can enjoy my penis more... Give me a break! Oh and please charge me for it and then turn around and sell it to cosmetics companies for a few thousand dollars so old ladies can have facial creams with collagen from my foreskin.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 11:08 PM
4

Who would be proud of that? You take pride in actions, not characteristics. It might be hard to accept the truth that it is mutilation but definitions don't hinge on your emotions.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 11:06 PM
6

It doesn't matter what they consider it to be, it is by definition mutilated. I get that it's hard to accept but it's the truth.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 11:04 PM
2

I hope it came across as sarcastic.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 12:11 AM
177

Closest man in their vicinity when they change their mind.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 01:56 PM
2

So where is this video?
/r/MensRights28/12/16 12:50 AM
2

Hey captain
/r/MensRights18/12/16 02:25 PM
14

That narrator was annoying as fuck.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 04:24 AM
0

Learn to not take things so seriously bud, you'll enjoy life more.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 02:15 AM
0

Aspergers confirmed. I think I hear your mom calling you because your sandwich is ready. Run along.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 09:36 PM
0

I didn't modify anything, you read to much into my initial statement when you freaked out and demanded I source a claim I never really made. How long have you been suffering from aspergers?
/r/MensRights17/12/16 02:01 PM
0

I never said it had direct bearing on it. I said it can help with a custody battle. There would have to be other reasons as well like neglect or drug addiction.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 02:00 AM
1

Are you suggesting that you get all of your information from this sub alone? No I'm good.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 01:41 AM
1

Yessir
/r/MensRights17/12/16 01:24 AM
0

Oh go fuck yourself and your Feminist name calling bullshit. I'm the farthest from it first of all and second, if you're too fucking stupid to accept that women have a better chance of losing their kids if they were the cheater and demand a source then you can go fucking find it yourself you lazy cunt. You stupid lazy cunt. I made a suggestion that this was the case, I didn't cite any specific case either so why do you need a source? Is your brain to fucked up to just accept that this makes logi…
/r/MensRights16/12/16 06:43 PM
0

Yeah that happens too. I'm just pointing out that the man has a better chance of getting custody of she was the one who cheated and destroyed the relationship. Google it for your own sources, I'm not your personal researcher.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 02:15 AM
6

Women who get divorced because they were caught cheating are more likely to lose custody than women who weren't cheating whores.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:00 AM
1

Ethnicity =\= Race Plus I never mentioned race once.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 07:27 PM
1

Neither am I. But that is the cultural aspect of their identity, that is why they are known as an Ethnoreligion.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 09:41 PM
7

You could give the sex robot an ID that states their "age".
/r/MensRights25/11/16 03:34 PM
46

"I want people to stop thinking about the word 'robot' and think about the word 'property', and what we're being encouraged to do is have relationships with property," She argues that not only are sex robots "dehumanising and isolating", they are also inherently sexist. As she rubs her clit with the "Super Realistic Vibrating Cock" while giving the interview over the phone.... Clearly she is promoting this for men and not even for their entire bodies, just the parts they are interested in... she…
/r/MensRights25/11/16 03:30 PM
1

This doesn't help your case, in fact it helps mine. Of course people born of a Jewish mother are Jewish... That's cultural, genetic and ethnic right there. I never said Jewish law trumps genetics but if you're mother is Jewish then genetically and ethnically so are you.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 03:21 PM
3

Their children would especially if their spouses are ethnically Jewish and yes Jews do have some genetically unique birth defects that they can test for during pregnancy but so do many ethnicities. It's seems like you're more concerned with demonstrating that ethnic Jews share the risk of certain birth defects more than you are concerned with the rest of your argument. You keep coming back to it in what seems like a backhanded way to put them down, well there are tons of ethnicities that share g…
/r/MensRights24/11/16 04:41 PM
8

No I'm not. If a Jew is atheist there's still a near definite chance that he or she is ethnically Jewish and culturally Jewish. I'm sure they still attend family gatherings that may happen to be Jewish holidays because it's a tradition they've celebrated since they were kids and besides, their whole family is there. The only people who would not be ethnically or culturally Jewish would be a Jewish convert.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 02:55 PM
15

You could not be more wrong. It's almost as if these answers are extremely available on the internet as well. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_atheism
/r/MensRights24/11/16 12:52 PM
10

You're wrong here. The Jews as a people are a precursor to the religion even existing in the first place. Not the other way around. Yes, you can convert but when someone refers to "the Jews" they're referring to the ethnicity and not the religion. It's their ethnicity and tight knit culture that had made them targets of genocides in the past, not their religion. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jews
/r/MensRights24/11/16 12:48 PM
8

It's an Ethnoreligion meaning that the ethnicity is a major part of being a Jew, more so than the actual religion. There are tons of Non-practicing Jews who aren't religious at all but they're certainly still Jews.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 12:46 PM
1

Lol
/r/MensRights09/11/16 02:22 AM
1

I hear you man but that doesn't mean that there aren't different sub groups within feminism. Google 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th wave for very general groupings and a more specific one I can think of off of the top of my head is TERFs.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 11:31 PM
1

So both fundraisers got pulled from YouCaring, now Hugh Mungus had over $60k raised for him so far on GoFundMe. I cannot find a replacement campaign for Zarnia. How long do you guys think it will before she posts a video declaring the fundraising discrepancies as clear evidence of 'The Patriarchy'? Zarnia, if you think everyone is a shitty asshole then there's a very good chance that you are the actual asshole and we are all tired of your shit.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 11:17 PM
1

There are certainly different camps in feminism that don't get along with each other, so it's more an attempt not to alienate the sane, nice, thoughtful feminists in the world.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 11:08 PM
1

Yes. According to her all police are racist rapist murderers, even the black cops who are Uncle Tom rapist murderers. She should be committed.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 11:04 PM
2

That's why she's never gotten laid. No man can stand her presence longer than a couple of seconds.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 11:02 PM
-2

Cool story. That is one place... Cops also have regular training after they become cops. They go to the range to practice different scenarios on the regular and this goes on and on and on. I don't hairstylists do any follow-up training once certified.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 02:49 PM
2

Probably
/r/MensRights07/11/16 02:48 PM
1

Well they're definitely not public courses but they are out there.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 02:47 PM
-1

In fact they usually have way more required training than the police who are given a gun. Well that just isn't true...
/r/MensRights07/11/16 02:58 AM
2

Women don't have barbers, they have hair stylists who went to cosmetology school. Barbers go to barber school and actually get licensed by the state.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 02:06 AM
8

My mother in law should go in for a straight razor shave.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 02:05 AM
10

Augusta* And they caved. https://www.google.com/amp/www.csmonitor.com/layout/set/amphtml/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2012/0820/All-male-Augusta-National-invites-first-female-members I caddied at a place by my house that is still all male. They used to be on the tour but they got kicked off because they'd refused to allow blacks and other non White's when segregation etc ended. I think they finally allow blacks now, wouldn't be surprised if they don't though.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 02:03 AM
4

I guess some people consider golf to be a religion...
/r/MensRights07/11/16 02:01 AM
5

That only applies to government funded stuff and business and groups open to the public. A private club can still ban any group of people they want. So just like how you have to make a cake for a gay wedding, if you had a private cake club with actual membership and dues you could get around it. I know it's a weird analogy but private clubs can do whatever they want.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 02:00 AM
5

Yes. Private golf clubs are a good example. I used to caddy at one where women, Blacks and Latinos were all banned. Only "white" and Asian members allowed. There were Jewish people and a few openly gay guys that allegedly walked around the clubhouse naked (this could just have been a weird story to tell new caddys, we weren't allowed in the clubhouse so we never found out if it was true.) One time some new B caddy's Mom came to pick him up and instead of taking the driveway to the caddy shack, s…
/r/MensRights07/11/16 01:53 AM
2

I agree, I'm not saying anyone is required to do it, just that it is a good idea. You'd be within your rights to break her nose and knock her out technically but is it really worth it? You can show her that you are much more powerful than her, control her, embarrass her and teach her as lesson without breaking a part of her. We all know that would be the easy option, to just crush her with a haymaker, that harder option is controlling yourself, taking control of the situation and just literally …
/r/MensRights06/11/16 12:43 PM
6

There's also something called the use of force continuum that people should consider. I'm not excusing her cunt behavior but just because you could knock her out and fuck her up doesn't mean that you should. Besides it'd probably be just as effective to just grab and control her arms and shake her back and forth and then give her an old timey slap across the face like how Don Draper would do it. It'd control the situation, embarrass the cunt and you aren't crushing some dumb drunk girls orbital …
/r/MensRights06/11/16 02:05 AM
2

Did you just genderize me?!?!?
/r/MensRights01/11/16 01:49 PM
5

This is just in Australia right? I'm pretty sure in the USA the cops will often ask if you want to press charges for shit like this and it's your call.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 01:45 PM
10

Well as it stands now there are 2400 signatures on the counter petition, the article you posted says that they were only 2300 signatures to get this pulled. So I guess now we wait to see if this Cinema considers men's voices as much as they do women's. I predict you'll need about 3x as many signatures to have the same effect as these censoring cows.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 02:43 PM
3

Huh? Was there a pic I missed?
/r/MensRights18/10/16 01:36 AM
1

It still is a mental illness but no one wants to say it for fear of offending one of them or their army of SJW shills who will jump down your throat for suggesting these people are not mentally stable or even capable of rational thought on the subject. If options change as time goes on, can that change how psychiatric disorder is defined? No the condition remains a mental illness but the better options, like rebalancing brain chemistry that causes these delusions, will make their lives easier. I…
/r/MensRights25/09/16 03:16 PM
0

I'm really worried about the suicide spike that might come from these mtf boys in 10-15 years who have stunted growth, health problems, mental problems, and physical deformities because of this social experiment. But isn't the Transgenderism a mental problem in and of itself? I get that more mental problems can result directly from it, but it also appears to be a mental problem on it own. Edit: It so odd that someone would downvote a comment with an honest question to clarify, when it is painful…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 06:23 PM
1

Are you being fucking serious? GTFO here with the crybully bullshit and start using your brain instead of reacting to everything like a shrieking harpy.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 04:55 PM
1

All good, I was just saying. Carry on.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 08:42 PM
6

It's September...
/r/MensRights07/09/16 07:49 PM
10

That is their house
/r/MensRights06/09/16 07:36 PM
1

Yeah I noticed that after posting. So at least you've been informed right?!
/r/MensRights15/08/16 05:48 PM
1

Harvard Magazine is an independent publication not associated with the university in any way other than name and what they cover. That being said I thought the rest was spot on.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 03:48 PM
1

That is only for light, in pigmentation it is the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 03:44 PM
3

Attacked? I disagreed with you because it is not topical, it is reductive, it is illogical and you are wrong. Grow up.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 05:04 PM
2

It strikes the chord, as in music, not cord as in vacuum cleaner.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:51 PM
3

The one's that keep you from hearing voices is what I meant....and again...TMI.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:50 PM
3

Dude, you wouldn't know a Troll if it strolled up and took a dookie on your head. If anyone here qualifies, it would be you.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:50 PM
1

I never asked for your story or for any information about your penis. You are a damaged individual and you should go see a therapist or check yourself in for 72 evaluation for the sake of those around you.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:46 PM
3

Are you overdue for your medication?
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:40 PM
2

He doesn't know what he is talking about, you were dead on.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:39 PM
2

Chord*
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:36 PM
5

This is fucking hilarious watching you accuse people with salient points of trolling and running to some stupid fucking vote count, as if that matters at all, and then pretend that everyone is in agreement with you while every comment you make drowns in downvotes. Gee I wonder if a bunch of people just upvoted it b/c its a clickbait title and didn't even really think about what they were voting for....
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:36 PM
7

He is crazy, be careful. I engaged him and ended up getting a disturbing PM: http://imgur.com/a/9CHZt
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:33 PM
0

And here it is Ladies and Gentleman....the creepiest comment that you've all been waiting for complete with way too much information about what is most likely a completely bullshit story about having sex with George Michael in a gimp mask and direct threats for I'm not even sure what. Moral of the story, this guy is fucking nuts, literally and figuratively, and he calls me a troll.... Wow, just wow... /u/ffxiv_machinist you might be interest in the threat part of this fantastic read...
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:31 PM
2

This 'article' is from The Frisky....so who the hell cares? This isn't the cover of Time or Newsweek, it is from a publication directed at women and their interests. This is like getting upset at Maxim for showing hot girls...it's a giant waste of time and comparing yourself to how feminists react is never a good idea.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 03:31 PM
1

I don't think all these people are idiots. They agree with my point of view. Well that certainly isn't a strong endorsement. I don't think everyone is an idiot either but I do think people are prone to make stupid choices based off of clickbait garbage titles like yours. As I have had far more funny nice guys comment than bitter old trolls like yourself, it doesn't really matter what you have to say. I doubt you'd fully understand it anyways. Carry on. Im certainly not to blame because my views …
/r/MensRights11/08/16 03:27 PM
5

Clearly he does...or else why would he post this with all the faux outrage? Only because some women freak out when they are objectified. Not all women give a shit dude, take all the modles for example, being objectififed is literally their livelihood. Go to club or bar and tell me that the girls in the skin tight dresses don't want to be objectified any more than the macho dude in the wife beater showing off his muscles... We just don't need this bitching and moaning "But they do it too!" bullsh…
/r/MensRights11/08/16 03:14 PM
8

it's hypocrisy of women some Feminists demanded to not be objectified FTFY. Hypocrisy cannot be applied to an entire sex, it is hard enough to do to an entire group, typically it should only be used when talking about an individual really. The point being that this whining garbage is exactly what feminists do when we roll their eyes about their complaints of female objectification. That being said, women as a whole certainly do not all agree with that idea. Don't be like a feminist...
/r/MensRights11/08/16 03:03 PM
1

Well, with 117 up votes in 3 hours and ranking #6 on the top score category, I really don't see any reason to take you seriously at all troll. Have a nice day and hang urself from the bridge u sleep under =) We'll just leave this here for posterity for the mods. :) That being said, just because 117 idiots on the internet gave you upvotes....on Reddit of all places....does not mean you're right, even remotely so. It just means that you successfully clickbaited some armchair MRMs into clicking upv…
/r/MensRights11/08/16 02:57 PM
3

Hypocrisy You are using it wrong. Feminists are not all women so painting an entire sex as hypocrites when a small group are the only ones out there complaining is disingenuous. It's just a bogus reaction to one article, you are acting exactly like the feminists you say you disagree with. It'd make more sense for you to say "Go ahead and look at dicks and I'm still gonna look at tits and ass." instead of getting all huffy puffy and declaring that someone being attracted to the opposite sex is so…
/r/MensRights11/08/16 02:48 PM
4

That word...I do not think it means what you think it means...
/r/MensRights11/08/16 02:27 PM
10

Says the guy who is literally bitching when women objectify men...ironic is it not?
/r/MensRights11/08/16 02:25 PM
5

But why male models?
/r/MensRights11/08/16 02:24 PM
0

Meaning what is the point of posting this incessant whining about girls ogling guys packages when your entire point is that they should not be whining about us ogling women's bodies. Live and let live. Let them ogle dicks and we can ogle tits and ass, but whining about them doing it is stooping to the level of the intolerable and irrational femtards that call the 'male gaze' problematic. In short, I take you as seriously as I take girls calling 'female objectification' problematic: I don't.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 02:22 PM
0

He's an idea... Keep on doing what you're doing and don't get upset when they do it too.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 01:59 PM
8

Right but they should follow up with false reporting charges to determine it.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 09:52 PM
44

This law needs to change. If she is caught lying then her name should be top of the front page the next day declaring her as such.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 08:18 PM
15

It takes courage to re-enact your rape Can't call it that because it didn't happen, he was absolved and all evidence from her communications after the alleged act show that she wanted to stay involved. So she reenacted sex she had with a prior boyfriend with some new friend who clearly would do anything to get his dick wet.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 02:12 PM
1

Agreed. I think people have the right to be upset that they were doing this reboot but shouldn't be because the reboot is all female. It goes against Canon but it didn't go against what can or cannot be funny and women can be funny. I'm not ashamed to say it, I just watched Pitch Perfect and I looked it.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 06:09 PM
4

If only he'd thought of that and slow played it to be able to highlight their double standard bullshit on line tv.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 06:01 PM
1

I was agreeing with you
/r/PussyPass07/07/16 01:02 AM
3

This isn't brigading sweet summer child. I haven't sent an entire sub to downvote you. I'm just reading your predictably asinine comment history and chiming in when you say particularly stupid things, which as you can see is often.
/r/PussyPass06/07/16 10:44 PM
0

Awww...poor thing is retarded.
/r/PussyPass06/07/16 09:45 PM
2

I ran into this guy earlier and have been checking out his comments, I get the feeling he is about 14 years old, thinks he is smart as shit and has some major issues to deal with, mainly his Napoleon Complex.
/r/PussyPass06/07/16 09:45 PM
1

So is this what you do on Reddit? Get into arguments you are hopelessly outclassed and outeducated on and insist that the guy who clearly knows what he is talking about is full of shit? Must be a sad existence. Maybe you should consider ending it.
/r/PussyPass06/07/16 09:43 PM
3

Maybe you should stop being such an insufferable retard and learn what satire is.
/r/PussyPass06/07/16 09:42 PM
2

Good stuff Britain! They are ahead of the curve on this issue and America could take a fucking lesson from them on respecting the bodily autonomy, rights and consent of infant boys instead of continuing to pretend that the wanton use of routine male genital mutilation is in any way acceptable.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 02:29 PM
1

What are you talking about rage? That was just an response to that guy being an idiot.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 04:43 PM
2

Right?
/r/MensRights14/06/16 08:26 PM
5

there is 10000 years worth of recorded history that proves it You're a fucking idiot. The total length of recorded history is roughly 5,000 years, beginning with Sumerian Cuneiform. Don't try to bullshit someone with a History degree about history when it is crystal clear that the only history you subscribe to is revisionist and non-existant...unless you're out there reading and interpreting the wall paintings to tell us that there were no strong women leaders during pre-history. And what? You d…
/r/MensRights14/06/16 08:09 PM
2

Fucking stupid, is it all because of that Barbie Doll retard you had for a president? The corrupt cunt who protected the ex President from corruption charges by appointing him a position? That was Argentina wasn't it?
/r/MensRights14/06/16 07:59 PM
1

This was the perfect response.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 07:15 PM
5

Dude...this is /r/MensRights, not /r/WeHateWomen. That was a lot of bullshit too. There have been countless rich and powerful women throughout history, which you are apparently not a student of.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 07:14 PM
3

That. Is. Pathetic. It's like affirmative action mixed with title IX and put on steroids and covered in toxic goo to give it super powers.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 07:11 PM
2

Yes, to the admins.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 07:10 PM
2

And they say women aren't into STEM.....
/r/MensRights14/06/16 07:09 PM
3

WE FUCKING KNOW...WHY ARE YOU IDIOTS STILL TALKING ABOUT IT? SHE GOT THE JOKE AND MADE A JOKE RESPONSE BACK TO HIM. Jesus christ...
/r/MensRights14/06/16 07:04 PM
6

I don't know what these turd nuggets problems are, it was obvious that you got the joke and responded in kind. I'll take some downvotes too assholes.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 07:03 PM
12

Yup It's time to change the laws. He hit on that though when he spoke about "Male abortion".
/r/MensRights14/06/16 07:01 PM
3

Well clearly being supported by an ex means you are strong and independent.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 06:59 PM
2

This pretty much sums up the way these idiots view the situation.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 06:53 PM
3

To be honest it's probably just a mistake. That source is total garbage juice and I are typos and other fuck ups in their articles constantly. I've seen thoughts go unfinished where a sentence just trails off mid-thought never to be finished and only serving to confuse you.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 05:04 PM
1

Ha-ha that is fucking hilarious. Got my boss to come look over my shoulder from laughing out loud.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 12:54 PM
7

Why are British women so strange looking? They always seem to have a little Alien look to them.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 11:45 AM
4

Yes. In fact, not becomes a woman because you discover the vagina... Always was a woman who was just masquerading as a man but you discovered their lie. Gender Dysphoria/dysmorphia is a mental illness, it is clearly a delusional view they have about themselves. We haven't found a way to counsel then or use drugs to rebalance then yet so instead we do the next best thing to help them deal with the crippling depression, anxiety and suicidal thoughts that go along with their mental illness which is…
/r/MensRights08/05/16 01:30 PM
1

Make outlandish claims, be prepared to cite your sources. That is a pretty pathetic line about the gun lobby not wanting info out there, they do a ton of the research and its objective and published. Unlike the hacks in the anti-gun lobby who actually spend more money than the Gun lobby. The NRA spending is on the smaller side of the scale when it comes to lobbying groups. They don't need to spend money because we have so many people who use their brains when it comes to gun rights. Australia is…
/r/MensRights06/05/16 04:42 PM
1

A different side of the story kind of like this one? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZGSQXmJPaQ You know what else is an anecdote? Every time you talk about this spree shooting or that spree shooting... Here is what a home invasion looks like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thVhVjn59mg This is why we won't give up our right to bear arms. And to deal with things like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jt9GQnBhw6A Sadly someone in these situations in your country would be forced to wait in fe…
/r/MensRights06/05/16 04:37 PM
1

I know. He is awful
/r/MensRights06/05/16 12:39 PM
1

Feels great. I'd rather live in a country where we aren't treated like toddlers that can't handle anything that happens in real life than a giant babysitters club where we aren't allowed to do very much. Besides, can you source those outlandish claims? Perhaps the media hype has you by the balls thinking that these are everyday occurrences in every community in America when they are extremely rare. Besides if other developed countries had the amount of urban centers and the sheer size that we do…
/r/MensRights06/05/16 12:38 PM
1

Clearly you've never been there. Had nothing to do with drugs. DGU doesn't get any statistics either, they're not a think tank or anything like that. It is literally just like this sub, random people posting stories relevant to the nature of the sub. They don't put forward any statistics and people there would downvote a drug shooting because that is stupid.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 12:11 PM
5

I am not deluded about how much occurs. I have a very good grasp on it actually. That's why I don't pretend that spree shootings are as significant as the media wants us all to think. I get it, they're horrible tragedies but they're a small part of everything. As for gang shootings being different? In a way they are because this was their choice, it's different when you factor in any innocent bystanders. But I'd much rather live somewhere where I can carry concealed and be able to at least fight…
/r/MensRights05/05/16 10:27 PM
5

So what? Crazy people do crazy shit and nothing will stop it. Besides mass shootings are a fraction of a percent of gun deaths the most of which are gangbangers in the city shooting each other.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 10:03 PM
8

I realize you're not all pussies, but how does it feel living in a country where a person can't even buy a god damn tazer much less a firearm for personal protection? Your country is run by poofs!
/r/MensRights05/05/16 09:10 PM
6

The English have become a load of cowardly and oversensitive twats these last 20-30 years. Seriously debating whether we should still be allies with that country of pansies.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 08:10 PM
1

But what was he when he took power? The elite ruling class.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 06:28 PM
1

'vanguard of the proletarian' using the upper classes of society to enact a top down change You can't say, "actually", and then literally repeat what I said. Who do you think the vanguard was to be other than the ruling elites who can actually enact this change.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 05:14 PM
2

Con Air had those hardened criminals but I'm referring to Nic Cage who killed a man who attacked his wife as well as his Diabetic buddy who is gentle as a kitten. They protect the female guard from getting raped by Johnny 47 and beyond that good act the audience definitely feels bad for these two guys. But there are also hardened cunts in OITNB that are portrayed as shitty as Cyrus in Con Air. Vee for example is a cold hearted, conniving bitch. She'd kill you for your apple sauce. Oz was an HBO …
/r/MensRights28/04/16 05:10 PM
2

The sarcasm is strong with you. I like it.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 04:04 PM
1

I can agree that it can be seen as partially a reaction to the rise of Marxism but they were never chummy. Benito started off in a Socialist party but when he got kicked out he literally founded Fascism. While there are similarities in the way they may operate on some levels, they are very different ideologies. Fascism rejects Marxism because Marxism rejects Nationalism. Marxism is all about using the upper classes of society to enact a top down change so that the workers own the means of produc…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 03:44 PM
6

I disagree totally. Yes we see the human side, the good side of these women in this show. But we also see the dirty, violent, law breaking side of these women too. Red - Worked with the Mafia outside of prison, it's suggested that she and her husband temporarily stored corpses for the mob after Red punches a mob bosses wife in the tit and explodes her breast implant. She rules her kitchen with an iron fist and everyone in the prison fears her and wouldn't cross her. She goes to jail for her part…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 02:26 PM
9

I couldn't agree with you more...when he said Nazi ideology was based on Marxism I was like, "Man you do not know what you're talking about."
/r/MensRights28/04/16 02:11 PM
13

What do they say?
/r/MensRights28/04/16 02:05 PM
1

Don't forget child abuse as a charge, you could probably pile neglect on to off that as well. Was this a judge's fuck up, a jury? How does this happen?!
/r/MensRights08/04/16 11:38 AM
1

Someone edited her 'art projects' wikipedia page and its definitely an improvement. https://web.archive.org/web/20160406133435/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mattress_Performance_%28Carry_That_Weight%29
/r/MensRights06/04/16 01:59 PM
1

Sure you do. Enjoy your memes and dodging arguments.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 05:02 PM
1

Which would be what flavor?
/r/MensRights05/04/16 12:01 PM
1

Why don't you just answer the argument instead of claiming that it's emotionally charged so that you can write it off and walk away?
/r/MensRights05/04/16 12:00 PM
0

Not accurate. They support state action in three distinct areas, not wherever it suits them. Yes they think that a lot of government times can and should be performed by the private sector as needed. Basically they just want to limit government, not destroy it.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 11:58 AM
1

Uh.... Yeah. Why is that a bad thing? Are you seriously suggesting that no one should ever question authority, be sceptical of governments motives etc? Or should we all just join together in lockstep to support and follow everything the giant bureaucracies decide for us? I'd say yours is the naive point of view if you just blindly go along with government orders without thinking for yourself or every question the legitimacy of a government action or decree. Libertarians challenge authority of th…
/r/MensRights05/04/16 11:54 AM
1

You say the word Libertarian like it's a bad thing.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 11:49 AM
2

I think it's fucked that the article is giving credit to feminism in general and to some group of young women specifically when men's rights has been calling for this law for a long time IIRC. Finally a men's rights issue makes it to the MSM and they call it feminist in nature, by definition, by design. What bullshit. The process would be tedious and expensive to still promote the use of contraception and the practice of safe sex. Make abortion expensive and tedious, hard to get for a woman and …
/r/MensRights05/04/16 11:45 AM
3

Then good on you.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 11:11 PM
7

She probably just wanted to touch your peepee and was shy and awkward about it. Not that it's an excuse but I guess what I'm saying is unless it really hurt I'd have treated it as flirting and bear hugged playfully.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 10:56 PM
9

There's nothing wrong with sarcasm or a lie. It's public you can film them all you want.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 10:54 PM
3

Hippy child more likely. They don't usually make their stage names legal.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 02:09 AM
7

That's an evasive, non-answer. The question was if they were paid to train. The answer is no, not that hazy thing you called an answer. Because they can train 24/7 but if there is no win then there is no pay.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:14 PM
1

Are you telling me that Mo Farah trains significantly harder than Usain Bolt just because he runs longer distances? Ummmm.....yeah. Running a marathon takes much more energy and fitness than a sprint. Hence the old addage, "It's a marathon, not a sprint." Anyone can sprint, not everyone can finish a marathon.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:02 PM
8

Are they being paid to train all day every day? No, they are paid when they win tournaments. I rest my case.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:01 PM
2

I'm not sure what you mean here besides this is against the law. So what was your actual point? Perhaps you can arrive at the actual point so you can spare us the rest of your backpedaling? This shouldn't be this hard ...
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:00 PM
3

I think he's already gone as far backwards as these arguments will allow, but wait, he could surprise us with something epic.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 07:58 PM
2

He didn't make any assumption at all actually, he was asking if you were being sarcastic because of how poorly thought and how incorrect this post was. This shouldn't be this hard ...
/r/MensRights21/03/16 07:55 PM
3

Women should be given more money for less productivity (or for less work in some cases) because motherhood on average penalizes them at the work market. That is not a penalty, that is a consequence resulting from a choice they made. It is also not a valid reason to ask to have women paid more money for less work. It is totally without merit actually because it is their choice, men cannot choose to abort a child for example, and they choose to have the child and now must ask for more flexible hou…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 07:53 PM
1

I appreciate the insightful take on it, it's good to hear the point of view of others. Particularly when they have first hand experience. My goal in posting it here was not to open a discussion on that exact topic though, rather I thought how he broke down the evasion tactics to honest debate. What's troubling is that even though the majority of your response was insightful you still disregard the author's opinion outright when he is clearly being genuine. Your last sentence attempts to claim mo…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 11:56 PM
3

I posted this because I felt that the tactics described in here to avoid debate are often the same ones used by 4th wave/Radical feminists to avoid debate. Ad hominem & lines of attack, avoiding the question, moving the goalposts. So while not directly related to MRA, I think it has an amazing breakdown of the arguments, or lack thereof, used by those who oppose men's rights and other groups to avoid any real meaningful discussion. Very eloquently written as well. Mods if it truly doesn't fit or…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 02:49 PM
1

Why don't they like her?
/r/MensRights11/03/16 08:24 PM
6

Yeah it's a tricky thing. That doesn't make it wrong if she is if age. Different people age differently. It's strange I know.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 07:56 PM
13

11 is a lot different than 16 or 17 which is the youngest I'd say she might be mistaken for. Poor comparison in my mind
/r/MensRights11/03/16 07:48 PM
19

You mean like this? SFW Who cares? It's not about what the girl looks like, it is about her physical age. It's not about the appearance of a girl, it's about her ability to make her own decision about performing and being printed in photos and on film nude for money. That is why there are laws saying porn actors need to be 18, it has nothing to do with appearances, it has everything to do with being able to make an educated decision and giving consent. That being said, 'appearance' of age should…
/r/MensRights11/03/16 06:51 PM
4

Yes obviously
/r/MensRights01/03/16 11:49 PM
1

She can give that answer after the bambino is born.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 11:48 PM
8

I'm also not a lawyer. But I do believe it's possible that a judge can list his immunity if it's found he acted with poor integrity. It sounds like he did something that might destroy his standing to the point that you can sue. Didn't Steven Avery include the judge in his lawsuit from the rape frame up?
/r/MensRights01/03/16 11:33 PM
2

That's the attorneys job, he'd probably try the same line if it were a man
/r/MensRights01/03/16 03:46 AM
1

Sometimes I wish I were still in college so I could walk the quad and be handed these pamphlets so that I could stick them down my pants, wipe my nut sweat on them and hand them back to the idiot handing them out.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 03:25 PM
-1

I'm not tone policing. I'm saying don't be an unnecessary douche bag. How is making outlandish and petulant remarks gonna help anything?
/r/MensRights11/02/16 12:44 PM
2

That's why I don't think it should be tolerated. No need to give anyone ammo even if you're saying it in jest.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 01:03 AM
3

Well that's just a shitty thing to say. You know how Feminists are always saying that MRAs are being dickhead assholes to them all the time? I hope you don't do twitter.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 11:13 PM
6

He's probably a cuck
/r/MensRights10/02/16 07:11 PM
5

Jackie Coakley and she is definitely hot, she's the kind of girl who has probably never been told no in her life.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 07:11 PM
21

I think Sabrina has gone into hiding and given up writing. So I guess that's at least a step in the right direction. I would hope she'd never find a writing job again. I don't wish her ill will, I hope she can find a job to support herself, just not as a journalist.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 07:08 PM
0

The fact that she most likely seduced him for his paycheck and benefits certainly has to do with Gender. She clearly didn't marry him for love or because she was attracted to him. She is a Femme Fatale, that is certainly a gender related detail. I didn't downvote you BTW.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 09:50 PM
3

No man, I'm willing to bet there is backstory as to why she married this guy. His charity was her meal ticket, she married him and he became her meal ticket but she didn't want to fuck him. So she had him killed. She was taking advantage of this poor guy, he was coerced most likely with sex and that is why I think its justified here. Because she used her feminine wiles over him and abused him as a result.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 09:06 PM
6

I don't get that, they've been taken into custody, her name is out there in the press. No one who knows them does not know what she did so what is the point actually? Who knows. We need a Polish Lawyer in here.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 09:03 PM
3

Found it: http://www.everyjoe.com/2014/11/13/sports/joanna-grabowski-photos-uncensored-threesome-olsztyn-poland/#1
/r/MensRights02/02/16 09:03 PM
10

It was in Poland.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 09:01 PM
2

Just ignore it. Attention is what they want. Besides censoring them is wrong and its what some of them would do to us. Don't be like them.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 01:21 AM
8

You best unfuck yourself or I will unscrew your head and shit down your neck!
/r/MensRights26/01/16 08:42 PM
3

I don't care, I would have hit her off button. I also never would have said that shit, didn't give her a right to hit him though.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 04:00 PM
16

Well that would be wise of them. I'm more upset that the guy didn't press charges. She tries to hit in the nuts, punch him and assault him other ways. Not to mention the destruction of property when shew as fucking with his belongings. I don't know if you could get charged with that simply for throwing stuff out the window but it seems like you should be able to.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 03:39 PM
12

2018: IT'S A MAN, BURN HIM ANYWAYS!!! BUT NOT IF ITS A TRANS MAN... THEY'RE OUR SECRET AGENTS
/r/MensRights20/01/16 09:53 PM
2

Oh, okay, yeah well you'd know way better than me.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 09:52 PM
2

Are you an attorney?
/r/MensRights20/01/16 09:15 PM
8

That is what he is suing her for.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 08:48 PM
4

I don't think that is a requirement, as seen here, since she is not named. Probably also to avoid the inevitable shit storm that would occur from TumblrWarriors saying he was naming her publicly to pressure her and coerce her etc etc blah...blah...barf....
/r/MensRights20/01/16 08:21 PM
4

I imagine it could fuck up his case. It could look like he is IDing them to coerce them into settling out of court etc.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 08:09 PM
26

2017: KILL THE WITCH!!!!!
/r/MensRights20/01/16 08:08 PM
2

Yeah pretty retarded.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 10:01 PM
1

I know I was wondering how that happened.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 01:52 AM
7

Why is the thumbnail David Bowie?
/r/MensRights12/01/16 10:04 PM
1

That's a backwards ass county then. I thought Kiwis prided themselves on being progressive? What if you're one of them transgendered folks?
/r/MensRights12/01/16 08:53 PM
1

Since when did the idea of a guy shaving his balls to "impress" women become popular? That's just stupid.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 12:54 PM
9

It sounds like she sucked his dick. How is a girl gonna say she is raped when she is the one who sucked the dick? WTF?
/r/MensRights01/12/15 09:59 PM
1

But it's England...
/r/MensRights25/11/15 12:57 PM
4

That's why I posted this here even at risk of it not being relevant to the sub.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 07:03 PM
12

Doesn't using pink go against her whole theory of trying to gender toys?
/r/MensRights18/11/15 07:16 PM
5

Maybe she got kindercanned!?
/r/MensRights18/11/15 07:15 PM
2

I thought that was what the patriarchy was for?
/r/MensRights17/11/15 09:48 PM
8

This is true everywhere.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 09:48 PM
1

"Firefighting has long been a male dominated profession...." "Landmark 50 percent quota on female recruits...." What's the problem? "What we are aiming to do this time is get more women to apply. That has been our problem in the past - small number of women applying," So what happens when they don't get the response they are looking for? Will they accept less male recruits as a result to even it out 50/50?
/r/MensRights17/11/15 09:47 PM
1

Not exactly, I attacked your position because it is archaic, backwards and inexcusable. I did not attack you. And it is spelled 'Ad Hominem'. It would be ad hominem if I had said: "Why don't you just admit that you want to mutilate penises because you are a stupid asshole."
/r/MensRights27/10/15 04:16 PM
1

Is English your second language? Just curious. I'm not trying to be rude, I just want to know if I am talking to someone learning the language or a teenager from all of the errors in grammar/spelling. If you are a second language person, then you are doing a great job. If you are a teenager, stay in school. In Hinduism, the cow is revered as the source of food and symbol of life and may never be killed. However, many non-Hindus interpret these beliefs to mean that Hindus worship cows. This is no…
/r/MensRights27/10/15 04:15 PM
1

considering the risk of urinary tract infection, certain rare cancers, phimosis, and other complications. Pretty much non-existent risks for all of the above. Why would you worry about that? You'd risk infections (very common in cut baby boys), healing in a deformed way (also quite common), loss of all sensitivity, loss of part of the penis, loss of the entire penis, skin bridges and adhesions, meatal stenosis or even death to try to prevent treatable things like a UTI (take a damn shower...), a…
/r/MensRights27/10/15 03:50 PM
2

Wouldn't the fact we started removing it imply that many men were forgetting, and thus there was a need for it. No. Why would it imply anything like that? It was based on religious leaders needs to curb what they saw as immorality. It was originally a way to 'purify' males who would otherwise be sex fiends according to the religious leaders and this tempered their drive. Can't do much when your dick is chopped apart and doesn't heal correctly for months since they didn't have antibiotics or neos…
/r/MensRights27/10/15 03:42 PM
1

It's Glans* It maintains the mucous membrane that keeps the skin happy and healthy similar to the clitoral hood in women. This image explains it pretty concisely: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-VJIJWpzT3sE/U0rsp-AGZqI/AAAAAAAABOo/HY-S9dTfys4/s1600/Meatal+Stenosis+Side+by+Side.jpg This image shows a side by side comparison that clealy shows how much healthier a glans protected by a foreskin is: http://s1.postimg.org/6ufr6xhy7/frenulum_on_intact_and_gone_from_cut.jpg Another of the same: http://intacti…
/r/MensRights27/10/15 03:30 PM
1

Personally, I want to last longer during sex, This has nothing to do with how sensitive your penis is. The sensistivity makes it feel better throughout, it does not cause premature ejaculation. That is all based on your techniques, mental state, concentration and other factors. I'm intact and I have no problems lasting a long time. I'm of the mind that it should be the decision of an adult and not done to toddlers who have no say in the procedure. 100% yes, that is all any intactivist will ever …
/r/MensRights27/10/15 03:20 PM
1

It's not superfluous at all, not by any stretch of the imagination actually. It helps with masturbation as it glides nicely up and down the shaft. Any guy who is whole has probably suggests wondered why other guys talk about jerking off with lube because they've never had the need for it, nature provided theirs. It helps with entrance in sex, day the girl is not quite aroused ask the way and her lubrication hasn't made it all the way to the opening etc. The gliding motion again allows you easy p…
/r/MensRights27/10/15 01:41 PM
0

Hue
/r/MensRights27/10/15 04:08 AM
2

I don't understand why you would assume that we don't need it if it enhances sexual arousal and maintains a healthy glans.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 04:07 AM
1

The foreskin serves many purposes being protecting and keep the glans healthy. Most of its purpose is sexual function, the housing action helps entrance and masturbation. There are tons of nerve endings that are in that specialized stretchy skin. You lose a ton of skin when you are circumcised.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 04:06 AM
2

How would you forget to clean your dick until it was too late? Do you not take daily showers? It's amazingly simple, almost like it was designed by nature. Most men in the world aren't cut so your assumption that most men would forget is ridiculous. It's similar to the labia and clitoral hood in that it is supposed to maintain a certain moisture level. Rinse it each day and it takes care of itself. When it's cut off it dries out and campuses leading to a less sensitive glans.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 04:04 AM
3

Very true, there are no benefits. Only drawbacks.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 07:21 PM
1

Those are all great reasons, they really are and there are a ton out there just like it. But only one reason matters. It's his foreskin, it should be his choice. They talk about informed consent in this struggle but don't seem to have the slightest understanding of the concept.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 07:21 PM
3

What led to Ryan’s death? Circumcision. How to prevent similar tragedies in future? Don't have your kid circumcised. The group revisited the issue with a report just last month that addressed growing evidence circumcision helps prevent sexually transmitted disease, acting almost like a vaccine in countries with high rates of HIV. Circumcised boys are also less likely to suffer urinary-tract infections and to develop rare penile cancer later in life, the society says. Are groups of doctors seriou…
/r/MensRights26/10/15 07:17 PM
-9

Right, because old and disabled men made the journey? Not likely.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 04:32 PM
-6

Women aren't as hardy as men and get cold easier. Big deal.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 04:22 PM
1

Fair enough I'm not paying for a subscription so I didn't get the full read. That's fucking stupid, it should only apply to the state it occurred in.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 12:06 PM
5

Wrong. The article says that he doesn't have to join the list and he isn't being found guilty of a felony. He won't have a record if he can stay out of trouble for his probation. I agree it's stupid to say you can only use the computer for homework though.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 03:15 AM
6

How are you feeling bro? I had something similar, although not as bad in my opinion, happen the first week of my freshman year in college. I went to a large university and had a friend (girl) that went to a cosmetology school down the road. A buddy of mine and I decided to go see her on Friday night. We are hanging out at the Cosmo schools apartment block, kind of like dorms but less rules. We are drinking having fun and a few girls come down from upstairs. One of them has an older brother at my…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 07:15 PM
-11

Girl? I thought they said it was a boy.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 01:04 PM
0

Seems fitting? I'm sure it's par for the course.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 12:49 PM
3

Could you? My Calculator doesn't carry that many digits. Apparently it does. I hope I did this right: 550/31,000,000 = %0.0000177. So they want to recommend circumcisions for 31 million men (in the UK) to prevent 550 cases of penis cancer. Or to reduce that down that would be 620,000 circumcisions to prevent 11 cases of penis cancer. If anyone sees any mistake in my math please let me know as I don't know how to take into account that this is a yearly number. I never took Stats sorry. I also jus…
/r/MensRights01/10/15 01:11 PM
3

Sure thing: As Gregory Boyle and George Hill explain in their extensive analysis of the RCTs: While the “gold standard” for medical trials is the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, the African trials suffered a number of serious problems including problematic randomisation and selection bias, inadequate blinding, lack of placebo-control (male circumcision could not be concealed), inadequate equipoise, experimenter bias, attrition (673 drop-outs in female-to-male trials), not inv…
/r/MensRights01/10/15 01:01 PM
1

Their is no logic to FGM, so there is no need to try to apply any to it.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 12:43 AM
1

And even if you could demonstrate this I could then argue that FGM is not the cause for the higher STD transmission, it's the higher promiscuity of the men. At which point your initial stance would be moot.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 08:50 PM
2

if two clean people only have sex with each other, they could do it a billion times and never get an STD. You can catch STDs via other methods than sex. You are assuming a lot about these men's fidelity considering their level of respect for women as well. It is well known that African men enjoy prostitutes and promiscuous sex. Source Again, I want numbers on average consensual sexual partners comparing women with and without FGM to then be compared with the increase in non-spousal rape. Then I …
/r/MensRights30/09/15 08:49 PM
2

Exactly.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 08:44 PM
2

There is also the cultural aspect to consider where women are still subservient to husbands over in many of these places. They are expected to have sex so they do, so disregarding rapes, I still do not see this making a difference. I wish I could remember the source right now, but I do recall seeing a documentary about FGM where it stated that the majority of African women in places that practice FGM expect sex to be painful. It's what their mothers tell them, its what their grandmothers tell th…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 07:44 PM
2

What exactly are you even getting at? It's very vague and unclear.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 07:37 PM
6

Right? Loss of sensitivity, keratinization (callousing) of the foreskin due to loss of the foreskin and drying out what is meant to be a mucuous membrane are totally understandable! /s
/r/MensRights30/09/15 07:34 PM
2

Think about how many girls are raped over there. Not only is it barbaric (FGM) but it won't make a difference.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 07:32 PM
5

I have nothing against men consenting to medical circumcision to fight AIDS. I also have nothing against people consenting to taking snake oil to cure or prevent other illnesses. That doesn't mean it is effective in any way shape or form.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 07:31 PM
2

Those studies have been shown to completely lack any scientific method. It is likely that their numbers were derived from the education they gave them on safe sex along with their circumcisions. They also shut the study down once they got numbers that looked good in support of it. In other words the study that the UN bases this off of was a total sham.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 07:27 PM
4

Chopping up little boys and teenagers penises won't stop them from getting AIDs via other means either. Dirty needles, open sores in the mouth during kissing, open sores on the penis from masturbating with too much friction and then having oral/anal/vaginal intercourse as well as other means of being infected. The main reason people cite that study out of Africa that 'showed' circumcision reduced the transmission rates of HIV in African countries is because those involved in the study who were c…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 07:24 PM
10

Proponents literally cite that it will prevent penis cancer. I for one have never actually heard of a case of penis cancer. So their logic is to disrupt the natural development of millions of boys to make a dent in a disease that is so fucking rare already that basically no one has ever heard of it. It's just astounding the mental Olympics these people will perform to justify chopping and tearing up infant penises. I think it has to do with the money hospitals make from selling the foreskins to …
/r/MensRights30/09/15 07:14 PM
16

It isn't though, this is MensRights, those are future men and they deserve our support as much as any other man being denied agency and self determination. David Reimer would have appreciated to have made this choice himself, he killed himself over it eventually. This is a tragic story so be forewarned that it might make you really fucking sad and/or angry.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:55 PM
29

The argument isn't to make you feel like your shit doesn't work, it is too late to worry about you or anyone who is cut, you can't go back and change your parents mind. It is about helping future generations of boys realize body integrity in their lifetime just as girls are guaranteed and people have fought so hard for. Just as it is the right and ethical thing to do for girls it is also the right and ethical thing to fight for with boys. If you're happy with it great, I'm happy to hear that, th…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:32 PM
4

Is my ass on display to the general public? I don't think you get your own faulty premise here and I don't think you know what a brigade is either. This is just everyone thinking your opinion is stupid.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 09:15 PM
5

Yeah totally true.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 06:48 PM
12

That's a funny one. Just to clarify there is no national age of consent, in the fact the majority of US states have an age of consent of sixteen. Many do have caveats that if the other person is X years older then they cannot consent which is retarded if you think about it. You can consent on one case but not in another based solely on the age of the other person? Talk about denying agency in certain situations. That being said we should just pick an age and stick to it.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 05:24 PM
1

BRRRRRAAAAAAHHHHHHMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
/r/MensRights17/09/15 05:20 PM
11

Do you get haircuts?
/r/MensRights17/09/15 05:18 PM
3

They already are having sex with robots. Dildos, vibrators, sex machines, sybian, I mean shit they already have blue tooth enabled and remote controlled vibrators.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 11:46 AM
5

Can you not say hospital please? I drove by one earlier today and I just don't think I can handle hearing that word.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 01:32 AM
10

I can't wait for all these old judges that don't understand technology to die or retire. Barbara Streisand effect
/r/MensRights17/09/15 01:31 AM
-1

It was a comment about the idea of heat sounding painful. Unless you're a scientist or an engineer then mentioning friction typically means heat and not the right amount that feels good.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 11:51 PM
-2

No I know all that but when someone says the word friction it implies heat, burning and therefore sores. Yes a little friction is good but not the friction you get if its dry for example, or you don't have a foreskin. I'm just saying the word invokes the thoughts of pain because we use lubricants/glide action to reduce friction to a tolerable and pleasurable level.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 09:32 PM
-3

Yeah I just don't think there is much of any friction involved. Blowjobs are clearly lubricated and usually people lube up for tit fucking unless your intact in which case you won't need any. Just thought it was odd to talk about friction. Friction sounds more like pain.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 06:09 PM
-6

What is this friction you speak of? Who wants friction on their dick? That sounds awful and not pleasant at all.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 05:58 PM
-1

I'm talking about the right to vote in America, a place we use as a barometer of society and what other societies strive to be like. I'm not concerned with men getting the right to vote in other countries as I was clearly talking about in the US where this movement was most well known and had the most impact worldwide.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 02:05 PM
1

I would agree with you.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 02:03 PM
-1

It's a date in time that I chose because women didn't have the same education options at that time. Even if seminaries and academies for women existed they were not respected or accredited the same as men's and they also didn't have co education until later on. Even once integrated they were still treated as below the men intellectually. If you can't admit that then you just belong on red pill. Co-Education It took until the late 1800's, and into the mid-1960's, for many colleges to transition t…
/r/MensRights11/09/15 02:01 PM
-1

Well I wouldn't call the movement of today relevant by any means but I get your point. I was just pointing out that the initial women's rights and feminist movement did make some positive changes but the pendulum had swing too far as it tends to do with all things like this. Similar to how affirmative action and related policies haves gone too far, or how the role of unions is now obsolete and has gone too far. I was just pointing out that things that were once good and made sense are no longer …
/r/MensRights11/09/15 01:55 PM
-1

So from the 1850s through the late 1920s women went to college in equal numbers?? we need a citation.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 09:55 PM
-6

It is a hate movement and feminists are hateful bigots. Said the pot to the kettle. Wrong, women actually were treated very poorly as second class citizens not all that long ago. They only got the right to vote 95 years ago in 1920. My mother was born in 1948 making her 67 if that makes this any easier for you to grasp. My grandmother was alive when this became law. Women did not go to college, women did not go to work, it was unheard of not long ago. Women were considered delicate and unable to…
/r/MensRights10/09/15 08:27 PM
10

It's so god damned sad that a relevant and respectable, even necessary movement has been co-opted by these new wave crazy people.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 04:04 PM
1

Sorry, that's what a I meant. Half of 70. I can't believe I fucked that up.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 06:55 PM
0

So I'm really shitty at statistics having never taken the class or read up on it but would that equal 45% of the total cases then?
/r/MensRights04/09/15 06:31 PM
7

You should tell her we use our penis for peeing too. Then sit back and watch her rage...
/r/MensRights25/08/15 04:52 PM
8

I laughed at your source, not rape. Semantics are important when discussing definitions, particularly when these definitions can be used in a misleading way to arrive at dubious statistics and I dismissed nothing. I pointed out that your stats are bullshit because they manipulated definitions to pump up numbers. We weren't discussing the article at this point but your bullshit assertions. You just made light of male sexual assault by saying I'm afraid of women touching my wee wee, way to undercu…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 09:54 PM
8

Hahaha...nice 'source', why didn't you go directly to Tumblr? Sure it is from CDC but did you actually check that source? If you had you'd have read this part: The specific types of sexual violence assessed included rape (completed or attempted forced penetration or alcohol- or drug-facilitated penetration) and sexual violence other than rape, including being made to penetrate a perpetrator, sexual coercion (nonphysically pressured unwanted penetration), unwanted sexual contact (e.g., kissing or…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 09:04 PM
3

1 in 6 females is raped in her lifetime. Check your facts mate because this one stinks like a bunch of horseshit.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 08:45 PM
20

Best summary ever.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 08:44 PM
22

So they banned boys wearing girls clothing at all. Can you imagine the shitstorm this would have caused today with all the snowflakes that we have in society nowadays? Good work though. Why did they ban shorts to begin with?
/r/MensRights21/08/15 08:18 PM
5

Sadly, even though we are pretty much already there, the prevailing attitudes that women are still under men's boot will take a long time to fade into the fantasy that it really is. The male privilege myth is still prevalent in a lot of circles even though there are clearly times and places where women enjoy more privilege over men, and yes there are still arenas where men enjoy some privilege over women. Frankly I think trying to do away with all of these little inconsistencies is futile and po…
/r/MensRights17/08/15 04:06 PM
1

You too.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 11:17 PM
7

Just take it easy, you've made a mistake in posting this. Just swallow the pride and click delete.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 11:14 PM
15

It isn't our place to interject into her life and fuck with her job if she works. That's the nasty inexcusable kind of shit that the extremists opposite of our cause try to pull. Don't sink to their level, even if you were successful what have you really accomplished beyond taking money out of her pocket and by default the kids? It might even drive up the fathers maintenance payment or put her on welfare which we all pay for. Plus everyone else is right, publicizing her petition is the opposite …
/r/MensRights10/08/15 11:12 PM
5

At least he is covering it.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 03:47 PM
1

I edited it in imgur so maybe RES stored the original?
/r/MensRights10/07/15 08:57 PM
1

It is when I click on it
/r/MensRights10/07/15 08:39 PM
1

Ohh, good catch. Fixed.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 08:05 PM
1

From the video where a guy stuffs his pants with a flacid but large looking dick and secretly videos girls on subway ogling him etc. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JV8JPZyJiuE
/r/MensRights10/07/15 07:45 PM
14

"May I insert my penis into your Vulva's introitus?"
/r/MensRights07/07/15 08:28 PM
2

Fair enough, I have nothing to go on except my perceptions since I don't go clubbing. I don't think I'd like anyone in that scene to be honest. The atypical portrayal of a club girl is ditzy, vapid, stupid and self involved above all else. That is not attractive to me no matter how skinny they are or how perfect their ass is or how nice their tits are. Would I fuck them? Yes absolutely, but my hooking up days are gone. I was really trying to make the point that 150 seems like a harsh number sinc…
/r/MensRights01/07/15 07:41 PM
1

I never said I wasn't attracted to them, just that I wouldn't date them. I didn't say fat either I said thick, as in a normal body size.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 11:53 AM
0

That's why I don't go to clubs. I'm not some Guido loser who is looking for Jersey Shore girls.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 11:52 AM
-7

Right, because no woman over 150 pounds are attractive and all men are into stick figures with big fake tits. Personally I like thicker girls and a personality is a must. I've found that super skinny club girls like you're describing are typically vapid and shallow. I want a girl I can actually respect I guess, not just arm candy. My two cents.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 08:17 PM
-3

You wot?
/r/MensRights30/06/15 08:13 PM
9

Yes
/r/MensRights30/06/15 08:12 PM
1

I'd figure out where she lives and take a big shit on her front porch.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 06:16 PM
-111

Yeah because condoms fucking suck the big one. I don't miss High School sex all that much because of how shitty condom feel.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 03:35 PM
2

Yeah never seen the episode but I don't think it's like it. Even if someone wants it for their son they should not forget that he will be a person who can make his own decisions one day and this is a major one that they are taking away the option for them.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 11:23 PM
12

Well a circumcision that goes "well" removes one third to one half on the skin of the entire penis, then it heals the best that it can. This is why most cut penises have a two tone appearance and the head will often look dried out and calloused from losing its protective sheath. So now just imagine what happens when they botch a circumcision. Baby penises are very small and they snip their way in and then tear the skin off of the glans because it is still fused to the glans at this point. So I'm…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 11:12 PM
29

Let us know how it turns out.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 09:16 PM
1

Yeah but pushing into her house without her permission after she said no one was there and they were wrong? Fuck those cops, they were on a fishing expedition. I kind of doubt anyone even made a call.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 08:51 PM
18

As a white cis man I would have shown up anyways and when they tried to kick me out I would begin screaming about being oppressed because I self identify as a gay black woman who sometimes also identifies as a wooden post or a German Shepherd.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 03:57 PM
0

Hahaha! Not disagreeing with you, I just thought that was quite funny.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 01:33 PM
1

Skip the first sentence of your post and the rest is a good example of symptoms of an abusive relationship. You can extrapolate all that from what she has said. What you can't do clearly is speculate on what he did to deserve any of this. Particularly because she is being intentionally vague about his grievances yet still playing them up to be something bad. If it is so bad that she is embarrassed to the point of taking over his social life and getting in social media confrontations and threaten…
/r/MensRights15/04/15 10:13 PM
1

There is actual evidence of her being abusive though. Everything else is speculation, particularly the idea that this man did anything wrong in the first place. That's my point.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 10:08 PM
1

I don't think it is fair to jump to any assumption of wrongdoing on his part. Are you just going to assume that this lunatic is telling the truth?
/r/MensRights15/04/15 04:39 PM
0

I don't think it is fair to assume that he cheated. It isn't fair to assume that he even did ANYTHING wrong. Why would you make an assumption of his wrongdoing based off of the rantings of a lunatic wife? She is clearly being abusive and likely wants people to think that he cheated so they will back her up and support her abusive actions.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 04:38 PM
2

I don't think this is a hijacking. More like you are skitching the top comment.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 04:11 PM
2

Unless he was verbally/physically abused into giving up his PWs and kowtowing to her demands. Then you are victim blaming. It seems like you think that just because he is a man that he can't possibly be bullied into doing these things.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 04:05 PM
0

Nah, he probably skipped Bible study for the last 5 months judging by the sheer craziness this woman is broadcasting here.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 04:04 PM
-2

Agreed, I made this comment before reading the article. It sounds more like they formed a line or took a number. In that case they should have known better. I'm sure some still felt bad about it or dirty etc.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 04:06 PM
3

"Think about how all the guys felt the day after." I don't see a problem with this one. If I slept with a woman and then found out the next day that she had also slept with 24 other guys the day before I would not feel very good about myself.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:26 PM
1

Cheers mate
/r/MensRights31/03/15 10:07 PM
1

I don't know I'm not British or Australian.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 10:00 PM
0

I think when you say 'the crown' you mean 'the government' irrespective of if that is local or national.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 09:25 PM
1

Manslaughter is a much lesser charge than murder. You can charge someone with both child abuse and neglect. Why are they taking it easy? Is that an easier question for you?
/r/MensRights31/03/15 08:49 PM
1

Yeah exactly. I don't know.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 08:48 PM
1

"Innocent until proven guilty" applies to everyone, not just people you like, and until proven guilty, their identity should be protected. She already plead guilty though... It was the Brit newspaper doing this, not those in her country. If you plead innocent, do you just get to walk free? She still has to go to court and be tried. People with mental illness plead guilty to crimes they don't commit, and the trial sorts that all out. Of course not if you please innocent, but if you admit why do w…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 08:47 PM
2

The Crown withdrew the charges of murder and neglect. Of murder and neglect. They withdrew those charges only, the other charges she plead guilty to are still in play.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 07:20 PM
0

I don't understand how having concrete video evidence is a reason to drop murder and abuse charges. Can you expound on what you mean here?
/r/MensRights31/03/15 07:19 PM
14

when his mother pleaded guilty to a number of charges, including manslaughter, reckless wounding in company and possessing and disseminating child abuse material. She also pleaded guilty to using a child in her care to produce abuse material. The Crown withdrew the charges of murder and neglect. The mother, who cannot be named, pleaded guilty to more than a dozen charges when she appeared via video link from Silverwater Correctional from jail at Central Local Court on Tuesday. She is set to appe…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 07:07 PM
17

Men's sexuality = bad. Women's sexuality = good.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 05:09 PM
2

Your grandpa got killed and put in concrete?
/r/MensRights28/03/15 04:50 PM
-1

Where are you guys hearing about this?
/r/MensRights28/03/15 04:43 PM
0

Is there any actual truth to this? Is this how she became reddits CEO?
/r/MensRights28/03/15 04:42 PM
11

Yeah shitty in a way. Judge Paul Taylor told her: “I am satisfied you have a mental health disorder, identified by a number of doctors as delusional. It is appropriate you be detained for medical treatment under a hospital order. A prison sentence would be limited and would not properly protect the public from you.” He added: “A hospital order could be seen as the soft option but in this case it is the opposite. It could lead to this woman spending the rest of her life in custody in a hospital e…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 08:33 PM
2

Pedophilia and Ephebophilia are two different things. This boy is not prepubescent so she is not a pedophile. He is a teenager, not a child. That being said, I have no issue with her sentence. If men in her position are given a sentence like that then so should she.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 04:37 PM
5

What you said is a fallacy because it doesn't even relate to the discussion here. It wasn't a false charge so your point is a fallacy.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 04:36 PM
3

How is this even remotely relevant considering it isn't a false charge? If this boy made all this up then I would agree with you, but since he didn't and she admitted guilt I think your point is entirely moot and completely irrelevant to the issue.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 04:34 PM
1

1) Contact Health Dept 2) Contact Police and report theft 3) Contact Media and run story 4) Contact a lawyer and sue her/the store or prepare to She'll be in the bread line faster than she can say, "Shitlord"
/r/MensRights16/03/15 03:02 PM
3

Going to the media would: 1) Get the Health Inspector out there ASAP, once they hear the report. (I would call anyways too.) 2) Get the word out that the store manager shit the bed regarding employee dismissal/discipline. 3) Get you out ahead of the narrative if she really is organizing a slander campaign/boycott against you. Being first on this often puts you in best position, they will look reactionary and have mud on their face when they start the slander campaign. 4) Will force the manager's…
/r/MensRights16/03/15 03:00 PM
18

Happy Cakeday newspaper man.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:48 PM
12

Yeah, exactly. Force their hand here and make them make a decision. Do they want this awful publicity or do they want to just fire an asshole employee that they shouldn't be protecting in the first place? Shit, I'd go to the media regardless of what they say or do just to shame this girl anyways.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:47 PM
2

Oh, I never would have figured that out on my own. Thanks
/r/MensRights11/03/15 05:54 PM
9

Right because it would be a violation of his son's rights. His son's rights are much more important regarding his own body than some fathers misguided ideas about this archaic procedure. To be honest I'm a bit confused by the guy above me but I think he is on the right side of things here.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 05:54 AM
2

Right. Hey just because I still don't get it what does this 'based' stuff mean?
/r/MensRights11/03/15 04:37 AM
5

This isn't about the parents, this is about the boys rights. What happens to her is secondary.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 01:31 AM
12

Because he is a total jackass. I know this is men's rights but it turns out that men aren't always right. And MRA should support this woman and her boy.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 01:30 AM
2

If /u/engineeringiscool is as good of an engineer as he is at understanding these concepts his work likely looks like this.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 11:37 PM
3

Relevant username.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 11:29 PM
3

Just buy a set of fake frames!
/r/MensRights15/01/15 10:29 PM
2

What job is that? What do you work like one hour days?
/r/MensRights15/01/15 07:30 PM
1

Yeah what a strange person.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 12:47 AM
2

Fuck that would be boring.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 09:28 PM
2

How does he keep track of all the usernames and PWs? Must be good with spreadsheets.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 09:06 PM
-1

I don't know... It'd be preferable to all of those insufferable stickers.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 04:43 PM
1

Only if you are a college student. It doesn't apply to adults.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 03:49 PM
1

Good point. I had a problem with the question because it indicates that they are both tipsy when they go home and engage in intercourse. Then it says that 'he undressed her and had intercourse with her.' I see a few issues here. *It's no easy task to undress someone else without them actively participating in the undressing. If he literally undressed her without any of her help then it sounds like she laid there and passed every opportunity to ask him to stop and express her non-consent. In my m…
/r/MensRights13/12/14 03:44 PM
1

Ok well said then. Plus I doubt they interview male prison inmates...
/r/MensRights12/12/14 04:35 PM
1

This is why a college degree is becoming basically useless.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 04:34 PM
4

You know I find this weird. You'd think that people would be happy to find out that the actual rate of rape for women was lower than previously thought. I can't believe how many people react to the number actually being lower with disdain or the belief that it somehow makes you a misogynist. Do what you will, but if that were my Dad I'd tell him to use his brain and think about why he is angry. Because logically he has no right to be. In fact he should stick up for you for taking an unpopular po…
/r/MensRights12/12/14 04:33 PM
2

I knew a pedant like you would come around. As a fellow pedant, I don't mind though, I'm just glad someone else thought about the left vs right thing depending on what side you view it from other than me. Have an upboat.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 04:22 PM
3

Oh sure, maybe write it up and give it to her right after finals are over. Someone should educate a misinformed educator or she will continue repeating that lie and more kids will believe it.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 02:55 PM
4

You should have dropped facts on her in the apology letter and set her straight. A well cited paper that starts out as an apology but ends up destroying her narrative. Intellectual discussion and debate should never be treated with hostility, the fact that she treated you this way shows that she doesn't deserve to be teaching.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 02:47 PM
5

Why did your Dad get mad at you?
/r/MensRights12/12/14 02:44 PM
1

Is your point that they should be saying the number is lower? I think the definition saying things like "forced sexual intercourse means vaginal, anal, or oral penetration by the offender" is unfortunate because it basically says that forced sex can only be man to woman. It completely discounts any man who has a woman force sex on him since she can only be penetrated and not the other way around. So any man who has been overpowered and forced to penetrate or any man who has been to drunk to say …
/r/MensRights12/12/14 02:41 PM
21

Scalped is the word you are looking for.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 04:39 AM
1

That along with other reasons is why I decided to post it here.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 01:24 PM
2

I think they are 'reviewing it'...
/r/MensRights01/12/14 10:50 PM
10

I found it because of the legal implications on having his guns confiscated by the state (illegally) in my news feed. Then as I read it I realized that this was relevant to MRA as well due to the custody battle and simply using the fact that he owns guns against him to gain an edge in divorce proceedings and determining custody rights. I feel badly he was raided and had his rights trampled in terms of 2A, but I feel terribly that he lost his kids, job and money as a result of his ex-wife's actio…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 04:44 PM
-1

Dude come on, this was like four lines from the top. Mr Justice Sweeney confined mother to psychiatric hospital indefinitely I'd rather go to prison where your roommate doesn't play with their turds all the time. I think she got the worse end of it.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 11:11 PM
1

Do we want a sexist system where women are protected and molly-coddled and men are disposable, or do we want an egalitarian system where the only limiting factors are biology and the necessity of the military operating at peak efficiency? Well since they can't complete the requirements it sounds like a wash to me so what is the difference? Sure it came off as sexist, I don't care I am a blunt person. Everything you mentioned above are the reasons I wouldn't want a woman in my unit. Not because t…
/r/MensRights12/11/14 03:32 PM
4

True
/r/MensRights12/11/14 05:42 AM
1

Good points I know we can't go back. One of those 'you can shit in one hand and shit in the other' situations I guess.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 05:42 AM
1

Most of the men in Vietnam who weren't in combat roles survived too. Sounds like a wash to me. I'm here because the way things have changed we need a counter balance to feminism. I souls prefer things the way they once were though when men were men and women were women. That's just my opinion I guess. Since that shop has sailed I only say this because women won't be nearly as effective as men combat roles or not. They just aren't in broad terms.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 03:37 AM
-8

Call me old fashioned but I like my women at home even if they have to rivet tanks together. Let's be honest if we are in s bad enough war that we start drafting again it's gonna be serious enough that you don't want women in the front lines. POGs sure, front lines no way.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 03:03 AM
27

The Defense Department last year ended a rule that had excluded women from direct combat roles. I heard a commercial a few times today making the point that women vets are seeing combat now and essentially that they face 'unique challenges' that apparently male combat vets don't. It made me really angry because they are going out of their fucking way to make a commercial aimed at only female vets and seemed to be taking away from male vets in my eyes. You cried and whined for years and years tha…
/r/MensRights12/11/14 03:00 AM
1

I thought that was what I did...
/r/MensRights05/11/14 02:23 PM
1

I meant you shouldn't take everything in life so seriously, but especially shit on the internet and even more so on Reddit itself. What did you want? An /s?
/r/MensRights05/11/14 02:23 PM
1

They apparently they are pretty gung ho and crazy about staying perfectly on message and not allowing any sort of discussion. They just like echos.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 02:22 PM
1

I'm just giving you a hard time. Try not take everything so seriously man.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 11:06 PM
6

Yeah I guess. I just got a response which I didn't think made much sense either: The tone of the article is anti-feminist and misses the point of why harassment occurs. It also suggests that sexism does not exist in Sydney, which I highly doubt. Thus, not relevant. Mind you that this is also a mod who has only been on Reddit for 2 months and has very little activity. I don't now maybe it is a new account or something. Found it odd to be a mod so fast though.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 10:27 PM
1

This is dumb, the link was to a profile not a thread.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 10:27 PM
0

It is in fact a private golf club. And it is in Illinois right outside Chicago and it definitely does not allow women, even to get out of their cars in front of the club house. It also doesn't allow black members. They can go their and play all they want, but they must be a guest of a member. I saw Jordan play there countless times as a caddy, but he isn't a member. So you're right, it's not that they aren't allowed to physically be there, it's that they can't join the club. Edit: Things have ch…
/r/MensRights04/11/14 10:21 PM
0

Stop overquoting it's annoying to read everything twice. There is no trolling here, just your annoying quoting habits.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 10:13 PM
1

Why didn't they just keep the urinals? Seems like it would have worked better. Guys file in and out quicker unless they have to shit, which leaves girls to have first pick on stalls most of the time. I don't see a problem with having urinals in a unisex bathroom. We don't pee sitting down and leaving the urinals will alleviate the unavoidable situation of getting piss on the seat in a stall. Can anyone explain why it was thought to be a good idea to remove the urinals? If it is because, "They ma…
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:55 PM
1

There are still no women allowed at a private golf club near me. No black people either though.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:51 PM
0

What do you mean? You're saying this sho I lent be a big deal despite this potentially causing multiple issues including men being accused of harrassment and men being exposed to the other sex when trying to urinate or deficate. I'm sorry but if the men's restroom is coed the the women's restroom should be as well and if that doesn't happen then the coed should be put back as men's only. I am sick and tired of seeing men and their places, hobbies, etc being taken away or demonized. Are we just q…
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:50 PM
1

In the men's or women's? That's fucked.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:48 PM
1

Pooping.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:48 PM
2

Too much work. I give it a wipe down and then just sit on it. They design the seats to be anti-mircrobial and what are you really afraid of sitting on? Ebola?
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:44 PM
9

Yeah, bannhammer. What a bunch of BS I thought they would like this article!
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:41 PM
1

I'm amazed that they don't see the disconnect between 'objectifying' a young man vs a young woman. Can't people just be attracted to what they are attracted to and stop apologizing when it doesn't fit some social norm?
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:40 PM
8

Yeah and now I can't reply to the Mod who messaged me, it just says: an error occurred (status: 403) Here is what I was going to ask her: What do you mean it isn't relevant? There were threads discussing the first video with the girl in NYC. This is an example of another place in the world where a woman received no harassment. I just thought that this was a good place to show that it isn't a 'Male problem' it is more of a cultural and probably locational problem. In other words I thought that Fe…
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:27 PM
43

It is because they place much more emphasis on periods. Buh-dum-tiss!
/r/MensRights04/11/14 07:40 PM
6

I just posted it over there, lets see what happens. Edit: Downvoted in less than a minute, no surprise there. No ban yet though. edit2: Actually up to +2
/r/MensRights04/11/14 07:29 PM
8

So if her excuse wouldn't have gotten her off one way or another......then how did she get off?
/r/MensRights31/10/14 07:43 PM
5

I know I live in the states. I was more asking about the legal system and how they looked over calling all of their witnesses and then the judge basically said, "Well since no other witnesses countered her points I am obligated to believe her." I mean, what in the hell?
/r/MensRights31/10/14 07:37 PM
27

Good pint. I stand corrected. Then still how the hell did she get off?
/r/MensRights31/10/14 07:33 PM
25

That has got to be one old fucking cat.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 07:26 PM
10

Except that he wasn't the one on trial, she was. They should still say allegedly. They should also have said allegedly about her hiring a hit man.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 07:23 PM
-31

Well if you're going to be technical, it doesn't say "Allegedly tried to hire a hitman" either.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 07:22 PM
28

Cpl. Thibeaudeau was the RCMP authority on the file, but was not called to testify. Neither was anyone else on the force. And neither was the man Nicole portrayed as a monster, her ex-husband Mike Ryan, who was sitting in his car in a nearby parking lot outside the courthouse, waiting to be called as a witness. Justice David Farrar of the Nova Scotia Supreme Court decided: “I have no difficulty in finding that Mr. Ryan was an abusive and manipulative individual,” adding that “the one person that…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 07:19 PM
1

That's what I keep telling my fiancee.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:41 PM
37

He signed with the Falcons so things are looking up beyond the initial getting a rape charge cleared. So that is good. She should get more than fines, she deserves prison time too.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 05:51 PM
1

Got ya had to show the video. I don't let that JavaScript crap run without my permission. Kept looking for it in the text
/r/MensRights04/10/14 02:17 AM
2

Have you ever been married? Ever seen a marriage license? Have you not heard if people getting awarded a divorce plus payments or assets because they can prove their partner cheated? Tryst me we have these laws and if you wanted to take it a step further with a contract we have that too, is called a prenuptial agreement.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 02:15 AM
3

There was more to it than just the coffee too so saying she did it in a fit of rage is out: http://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Doctor-get-10-years-for-poisoning-lover-5789393.php
/r/MensRights03/10/14 09:18 PM
9

Even worse, there was another article. I almost barfed. I feel bad for the cancer patient lady but you cannot excuse this type of action simply because women are getting breast cancer. She says she feels bad about the other Doctor but then says, "The other doctor says he has to go through kidney dialysis, and I'm sorry about that," said Lieber. "But do you know how many women are in chemo and get poisoned? We throw up, we get sick, we can't walk, and we're mutilated." How is the unfortunate circ…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 09:16 PM
5

Did they edit the article? I didn't see that stuff in there, or what another commenter said about 'losing a shining star...'
/r/MensRights03/10/14 09:05 PM
26

"Do no harm." She fucked that one up and shouldn't be allowed near anything medically related ever again.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 09:04 PM
3

Good post and all, but don't they have to be living together for it to be DV?
/r/MensRights03/10/14 09:01 PM
1

Wait...are you Eron? Wow, hey good for you for sticking up to herd. No one deserves to be treated that way, girl or guy. Sorry you have to deal with all this BS now and hopefully your lawyer will get a chance to actually present your case next time. I haven't been following this as closely as others obviously but I read your blog and man that was tough to read at parts. Other than you and Z's situation I really have no idea what is going on with the rest of #GG.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 08:04 PM
3

Thought you were joking until I looked it up. Is that actually it?
/r/MensRights03/10/14 07:32 PM
1

I disagree. I think this is a slippery slope whereby if we allowed this then we eventually would have to legal recourse (what do you actually mean by this in this situation?) for every time someone gets their feelings hurt. IF it ever comes to this I am leaving the country. I'm sure he hurts but that is life and he just needs to deal with it and move on.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 07:28 PM
3

My guess is Sensory Processing Disorder?
/r/MensRights03/10/14 04:34 PM
-1

For cheating on someone you ain't even married to yet? No. Just break up and move on.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 04:33 PM
7

Because all of the smart people with drive go out and get real jobs. These slobs only understand how to exist in this bubble. And yes it's a word, I use it constantly because my fiancee hates it because she also doesn't think it is a word.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 06:14 PM
10

But, he adds, even if it were illegal, some men consciously decide that they'd rather be charged with the less serious crime of illegal video recording than felony rape.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 06:12 PM
18

But, he adds, even if it were illegal, some men consciously decide that they'd rather be charged with the less serious crime of illegal video recording than felony rape. Essentially the same idea of 'It's better to be judged by twelve than carried by six.' Fuck the camera law protect yourself.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 06:10 PM
2

Themselves? I don't know either...
/r/MensRights22/09/14 05:10 PM
0

I mean you were technically correct but a victim still has a vested interest in seeing justice done. I just don't think it is relevant here.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 11:09 PM
-1

Irrelevant but accurate.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 02:47 AM
1

Totally unrelated. Different season/tag and its about conservation....Not sexism.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 10:42 PM
3

I think they would try to reason that the sex was the consent? I don't know anything about the legal precedent here but it seems like that would be the go to. "You shouldn't have had sex if you didn't want a child..." etc... Victim blaming BS and all that double standard crap to be sure would happen here.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 03:22 PM
1

Pretty stupid that you can get arrested for words. Is that really assault? Just using insulting words etc or does it have to be threatening? That's I get but assault for telling our something would be dumb.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 05:27 PM
10

So she dated some lazy assholes who don't shower, that's hardly a reflection of the average intact male. Did you miss the part where this was about stopping the infighting between men over circumcision? What's the point of putting down a person who has a different type off dick than you? I mean seriously, if you can get past the whole high school attitude of insults and quoting faulty studies about HIV maybe you're attitude will change. Those studies are quoted often but that issue is far from s…
/r/MensRights14/08/14 12:29 AM
63

The crowd was fair to the victims unlike in other incidents in the past whereby such people could not get an option of being taken to hospital after the whole ordeal such that they could bring in traditional circumcisers to circumcise them right along the road or in the middle of the town without receiving any injections to ease the pains or to prevent them from Tetanus and any other infections. What. The. Fuck? Fair in Africa seems to have a different meaning...
/r/MensRights03/08/14 11:39 PM
8

Which its completely stupid....why let people from another country petition our country to change?
/r/MensRights12/07/14 08:38 PM
17

under the law the boy would not have rights to the child unless he was present at the birth. That is crazy! What if you are stuck in traffic on your way to the hospital? Surely they don't deny Father's rights for being late etc...I hope. From the article below: http://www.theage.com.au/world/woman-36-charged-after-having-baby-fathered-by-11yearold-boy-20130615-2oapu.html As many as 5000 births each year fail to record the name of any father. Maybe they really do have to be in the hospital when h…
/r/MensRights14/06/14 09:44 PM
3

That is what I was thinking. He is a minor so shouldn't be revealed anyways and if it is her son it might be easier to identify him. Still odd though.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 09:42 PM
1

So sign up for healthcare and all of these will be taken care of all at once, right?
/r/MensRights10/06/14 09:16 PM
1

I am 100% in support of lasers, I think their applications could be endless and really change the way we do things once we understand them better. Yeah they may, it's gonna be a lot easier to beat them if you weren't charged due to self defense. Plus again you are the only one who has a testimony. Either way, I would rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 11:22 PM
28

Listen for the zipper sound around 0:58, she unzips his pants. You can see them unzipped towards the end, she was probably going to cry rape. She already assumed he was a creepy voyeur type so she was just selling it for when the cops came.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 07:13 PM
1

Exactly, when crazy attacks you all rules go out the window. I also would have had a hard time resisting the urge to knock that cunt out.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 07:11 PM
0

Dead men tell no tales. So if you shoot to kill they only have your version of events and any witnesses. Assuming you acted correctly then you will be justified and not prosecuted. If you let the shitbag live then not only do you have to counter their bullshit but they may also sue you for shooting them. It is not worth it to try to wing someone, it will screw you in the end so just shoot to kill if you have to but make it a last resort.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 07:09 PM
1

It was a small black lab. What's crazy about that?
/r/MensRights06/06/14 06:10 PM
1

And I couldn't care less. He is a great dog. Sweet as can be, he just kills varmints. Funny how the cat people what's stand up for cats killing stuff but when it's a dog then it's bad. He was perfectly trained and very well behaved. I bet you have a little cat dog anyways. So you carry it in a purse?
/r/MensRights06/06/14 06:08 PM
0

Shockingly accurate....
/r/MensRights06/06/14 03:13 AM
-3

Why? We don't have any cats... We actually dislike them as well. Dogs have owners, cats have staff.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 03:11 AM
0

Lmao
/r/MensRights06/06/14 03:07 AM
-3

Yeah. Joe is one of the best dogs we ever had. Wouldn't change a thing about him unless I could make him young again.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 07:40 PM
1

But...
/r/MensRights05/06/14 07:37 PM
0

When my parents got their dog Joe the pound was telling my Dad that the dog had previously been adopted from there by another family and that the reason they brought him back was because he shredded their cat all over the house. (What kind of idiot leaves a new dog around their cat in an enclosed space.) He asked the girl, "Well why did they bring the dog back?" She said, "I beg your pardon?" Confused by the question. He responds with, "The cat was already dead, seems like the problem was solved…
/r/MensRights05/06/14 07:35 PM
-2

Which will cost a lot money in the long run. I know execution can be expensive too but it shouldn't be
/r/PussyPass25/05/14 04:38 AM
-1

NCRr is a load of bullshit. If someone didn't have the mental capabilities to know that cutting someone's head off and eating then is wrong then why the fuck are we keeping them alive? Hang the bastard
/r/PussyPass25/05/14 12:15 AM
14

Too stupid to jail and yet they let her keep children...
/r/PussyPass25/05/14 12:11 AM
3

Typical.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 02:30 AM
2

Yeah. Plus my dog actually can open doors. We think his previous owner used to lock him up a lot, he has some chipped teeth now. He actually turns the knob and walks backward to pull it open. I was impressed but alas I had to scare him out of doing it anymore...
/r/MensRights20/05/14 12:20 AM
5

Whatever negative sounds better at the time
/r/MensRights20/05/14 12:18 AM
5

I have to go check this out. Really? Imaginary genders?
/r/MensRights20/05/14 12:17 AM
7

Plus, why not offer a true male version where we can rate girls? Equality and all that eh?
/r/MensRights20/05/14 12:15 AM
2

I run it already. But no everyone does so by linking this you are by default sending them some revenue by getting others to click it.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 04:33 PM
1

Yep. Thanks
/r/MensRights18/05/14 04:32 PM
3

Don't give them an audience, or click-revenue. I am glad you shared this, I wish there was a way we could link these articles without actually having to support the organization that is propagating this bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 04:05 PM
2

OTT?
/r/MensRights18/05/14 04:03 PM
18

I have a friend whose Mom was in High School when his Dad was a gym teacher there. Even weirder is that he was still working at the same school (now as a counselor) when his kids and I went there. It isn't really talked about by his parents AFAIK but we used to bust his balls about it a lot.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 04:02 PM
53

do we seriously think that a female teacher sleeping with a male pupil is on a par with a male teacher sleeping with a girl pupil? I don't. And neither, I'd wager, would most 15-year-old boys. Yes, they are on par with eachother. But if you want to assume things aren't equal, wouldn't it make more sense with a male teacher and a female student because girls hit puberty and mature sooner than boys? (Not really condoning this, just pointing out that biologically they are up speed first.) Most 15 y…
/r/MensRights18/05/14 03:55 PM
0

I was thinking that this is more of a shitty-customer than a MensRights thing until I got to this part: After she'd shouted at me and stormed out with her sweater, customers were giving me funny looks, one mother even ushered her kids away from me. So yeah that sucks and it isn't right. It goes both ways though, my GF is a store manager and has been spit in her face over the counter by a woman for refusing a return and calling her a racist etc... The stuff was clearly stolen and she said so in a…
/r/MensRights16/05/14 06:18 PM
2

Cool thanks
/r/MensRights29/04/14 05:47 AM
1

I unfortunately have never had the pleasure of reading it. Same goes for catcher in the rye and some other classics and I love reading. Especially sci-fi too. In the meantime, can you explain?
/r/MensRights29/04/14 05:04 AM
1

I'm not in the least ashamed of my thought that words have power and can be hurtful. Me either, of course they can be hurtful. Some are designed to be of course. That makes it pretty unlikely that you're going to be able to shame me by pointing out what my beliefs are. Would you say you have thick skin then? :) You think they should be ashamed of having such thin skin and should stop trying to change the world to fit their narrow view of it. (Which is just you wanting the world to change to fit …
/r/MensRights29/04/14 12:26 AM
0

So is that good?
/r/MensRights29/04/14 12:11 AM
1

That is harassment, bullying whatever. That is not insulting someone with offensive language. These are two very different things.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 12:08 AM
1

Totally different situations here. I can insult you without insinuating that I am going to hurt you, threaten you or your family. Bullying is a step in another direction from free speech and offensive speech. If someone says they are "going to kick your ass", you can call the cops because they directly threatened your well being. If someone calls you an "ass" and you call the cops...well then you are just an ass....
/r/MensRights29/04/14 12:05 AM
1

Sure lots of things can be offensive. That doesn't mean we should restrict free speech.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 12:04 AM
-1

However, I don't think that I should actually say something like that and if I did it I deserve to be shamed for the behavior. What if she is a bitch and you speak the truth? You should be shamed for thinking that people should be shamed for expressing their opinions, even when they use vulgar language. For example, "I think your attitude about this makes you a pussy. Man up buddy." /s I have the right to say this and you have the right to refute it. Your refutation of my opinion will do nothing…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 11:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter