TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

carbot117 Archive

View 167 posts and 323 comments by carbot117 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
3397

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights01/01/20 03:29 AM
3099

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights27/02/19 04:57 AM
2928

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights04/10/19 05:21 AM
2752

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights05/10/19 04:09 AM
2737

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights11/03/19 04:32 AM
2720

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights02/01/20 04:14 PM
2560

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights13/03/19 09:05 PM
2417

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights21/12/19 04:37 PM
2351

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights23/12/19 07:56 PM
1997

Unconfirmedcarbot117/r/MensRights21/10/19 07:19 AM
1822

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights18/10/19 08:04 PM
1503

carbot117/r/MensRights20/03/19 04:43 PM
1421

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights17/12/19 06:07 PM
971

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights01/03/19 07:53 PM
893

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights19/10/19 01:09 PM
810

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights26/02/19 09:04 PM
779

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights06/01/20 06:17 PM
691

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights05/10/19 05:58 PM
682

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights09/12/19 06:26 AM
654

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights06/10/19 12:56 AM
648

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights27/06/19 11:59 PM
623

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights21/12/19 03:38 PM
607

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights04/10/19 06:23 PM
537

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights16/02/19 09:00 PM
488

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights10/02/19 08:20 AM
453

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights24/06/19 05:03 PM
452

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights04/01/20 10:09 PM
374

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights08/01/20 09:13 PM
371

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights26/09/19 08:40 PM
356

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights04/10/19 06:36 PM
354

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights12/07/19 11:38 PM
345

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights08/04/19 10:43 PM
342

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights06/07/19 08:43 PM
336

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights17/03/20 11:57 PM
332

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights01/12/19 04:47 PM
325

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights10/12/19 06:42 PM
321

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights04/01/20 05:43 AM
315

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights02/06/19 03:18 PM
292

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights07/09/18 05:26 PM
282

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights06/03/19 04:43 PM
252

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights07/01/20 02:42 PM
222

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights14/07/19 01:59 AM
195

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights16/03/20 02:40 AM
185

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights28/03/19 08:44 PM
173

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights12/04/19 12:18 AM
171

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights19/10/19 11:11 PM
165

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights18/03/20 06:57 PM
162

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights08/02/19 02:35 AM
160

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights13/06/19 01:35 PM
160

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights23/12/19 04:51 PM
156

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights10/01/20 05:25 AM
154

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights11/02/19 06:47 PM
151

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights06/08/19 12:59 AM
149

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights14/07/19 01:21 AM
146

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights05/10/19 04:26 PM
144

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights13/09/19 08:22 PM
141

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights09/04/19 12:04 AM
135

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights05/03/19 11:09 PM
131

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights20/03/20 12:08 AM
131

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights10/02/19 06:05 PM
128

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights20/10/19 03:10 PM
124

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights15/03/19 03:06 PM
119

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights13/03/19 04:21 PM
117

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights20/10/19 07:04 AM
111

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights18/03/19 05:46 PM
109

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights29/07/18 01:34 AM
104

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights05/07/19 09:12 PM
102

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights06/12/19 03:37 PM
101

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights23/02/19 07:53 PM
100

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights22/11/19 08:12 PM
100

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights09/03/20 02:30 PM
93

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights15/03/19 05:14 PM
89

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights13/02/19 11:49 PM
89

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights22/02/19 09:52 PM
88

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights22/10/19 12:47 AM
87

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights26/12/19 05:42 AM
85

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights17/05/20 11:30 PM
80

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights12/04/19 05:46 PM
76

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights12/02/19 04:41 PM
75

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights27/03/19 03:52 AM
73

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights08/07/19 09:48 PM
73

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights01/08/19 08:28 PM
73

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights12/10/19 05:12 AM
71

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights10/01/20 03:12 AM
70

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights09/12/19 06:43 PM
66

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights21/10/19 11:28 PM
66

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights13/02/19 04:59 AM
65

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights28/03/19 07:18 PM
62

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights02/04/19 07:11 PM
58

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights16/09/19 06:45 PM
56

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights16/02/19 06:00 PM
56

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights17/01/20 10:27 PM
55

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights28/06/19 08:03 PM
54

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights15/02/19 01:40 AM
53

Legal Rightscarbot117/r/MensRights05/03/19 01:54 AM
51

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights03/01/20 02:02 AM
49

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights08/12/19 11:46 PM
49

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights15/12/19 04:10 PM
48

Generalcarbot117/r/MensRights10/04/19 03:41 AM
48

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights13/02/19 06:58 AM
47

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights12/03/19 12:56 AM
46

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights11/02/19 06:35 PM
43

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights19/03/19 01:46 AM
43

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights25/07/18 12:15 AM
42

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights08/02/19 09:39 PM
42

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights08/01/20 09:22 PM
41

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights12/09/18 05:57 PM
41

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights17/12/19 07:06 AM
40

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights14/02/19 04:18 AM
40

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights14/08/18 02:22 AM
39

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights12/04/19 06:23 PM
39

Feminismcarbot117/r/MensRights11/03/19 10:14 PM
38

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights13/04/19 10:00 PM
36

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights20/09/19 03:09 PM
36

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights12/02/19 05:28 PM
34

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights17/02/19 12:25 AM
34

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights09/02/19 11:22 PM
33

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights05/10/19 12:15 AM
28

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights21/07/18 01:49 AM
28

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights14/02/19 05:08 AM
26

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights14/02/19 05:44 PM
25

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights09/02/19 04:52 AM
22

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:59 PM
21

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights04/10/19 09:49 PM
21

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights15/03/19 09:54 PM
19

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights09/03/20 02:43 PM
18

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights23/02/19 05:58 PM
17

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights11/04/19 03:57 AM
16

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights21/12/19 04:06 PM
16

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights27/09/19 01:38 AM
16

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights12/02/20 05:45 PM
14

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights13/06/19 08:37 PM
13

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights10/01/20 03:18 AM
13

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights17/04/19 03:14 AM
11

carbot117/r/MensRights12/02/19 05:20 AM
10

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights03/07/19 10:56 PM
9

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights07/02/19 05:00 AM
6

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights08/01/20 04:57 AM
6

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights11/04/19 04:00 AM
6

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights26/09/19 07:19 PM
5

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights20/08/18 09:48 PM
5

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights07/02/19 08:33 AM
5

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights28/03/19 07:49 PM
5

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights12/02/19 09:17 PM
4

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights28/06/19 06:34 PM
3

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights19/03/19 01:44 AM
3

Feminismcarbot117/r/MensRights01/03/20 02:47 AM
2

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights08/04/19 01:41 AM
2

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights19/03/19 01:28 AM
2

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights07/01/20 05:47 AM
2

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights24/02/19 06:45 AM
1

carbot117/r/MensRights27/05/19 07:19 PM
1

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights19/03/19 01:38 AM
1

carbot117/r/MensRights12/09/18 05:42 PM
1

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights04/10/19 09:40 PM
1

NAH, SIScarbot117/r/FemaleDatingStrategy06/10/19 10:40 PM
1

carbot117/r/MensRights23/09/18 02:04 PM
1

carbot117/r/MensRights13/04/19 09:57 PM
1

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights18/02/19 05:47 AM
1

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights20/03/19 04:40 PM
1

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights20/03/19 04:33 PM
1

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights06/10/19 01:55 AM
1

carbot117/r/MensRights11/03/19 11:43 PM
1

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights06/10/19 01:59 AM
1

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights12/07/19 11:12 PM
0

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights17/12/19 10:16 PM
0

Intactivismcarbot117/r/MensRights06/12/19 06:43 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It’s against reddit policy to dox and the mods will remove my post. I will pm you a link to the post though.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 01:41 AM
5

Check out this twitter thread - https://twitter.com/briandavidearp/status/1240247658754777088?s=20 It highlights another quote from a participant in the study study - “If I were a man I would like to be born in a different country so I could keep my foreskin,” but I would circumcise my son anyway because “it's the normal thing to have in today’s culture, especially in the U.S.”
/r/MensRights19/03/20 12:00 AM
16

Official link to study - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15546128.2020.1737290?journalCode=wajs20 Go to https://sci-hub.tw/ to get around paywall.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 06:58 PM
19

I don’t play around with this topic at all. I think that man genitally mutilated his son. His “different” opinion is that he thinks it’s okay to strap a fragile child down and excise highly specialized genital structures off their penis. Absolutely vile and wicked. Personally, I have no tolerance left in my tank. What is going on is a criminal act of the highest possible caliber, and I will quite literally die on that hill if it comes to it.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 01:41 AM
23

Just stfu and get out of here. This sub isn’t for you.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 01:07 AM
14

Your way of thinking is completely alien to me. Highly erogenous and specialized genital structures are excised from children’s penises...? This is a profound problem and assault of the highest possible order. The position you hold is devoid of any semblance of critical thought. Your ego is doing its job and shielding you from this extremely harsh reality. I have nothing else to say. This is too obvious from a logical perspective. It seems to take a high degree of emotional intelligence as well …
/r/MensRights09/03/20 07:21 PM
26

No, what’s odd is the practice itself. Penis modifications on young boys? Exposing the insanity of that is not what is perverse here buddy.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 02:47 PM
23

I believe it is mutilation. This “procedure” removes highly erogenous and specialized genital structures from the penis such as the prepuce, ridged band and frenulum. Ablating these off the organ diminishes it significantly. You don’t even know the basic anatomy, and you are trivializing everything to protect your own ego. You really think it is acceptable to perform penis modification surgeries on kids for no reason? Absolutely mad.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 02:42 PM
6

It’s a genital modification surgery that removes highly erogenous and functional structures such as the prepuce, frenulum and ridged band from a fragile infant’s penis. You don’t understand the gravity of the situation because you really just don’t understand the anatomy of what is being excised and the implications of early infancy penile trauma on neurological development. Definitely something you should reflect on. Cultural norms have blinded us to the reality of what is actually going on.
/r/MensRights12/02/20 08:11 PM
13

Why not? It’s not comfortable to watch, but you learn a lot about this bizarre ritual and become much better informed on this very important issue.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 02:09 AM
8

The tonsils and appendix have a function. Emerging evidence is suggesting they are actually quite important. You won’t die without them, but you definitely lose some immunological function. You don’t want either of those structures out unless they absolutely need to be.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 03:23 AM
8

I love America and that’s why I want to change it.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 11:57 PM
25

Link to the book - https://www.amazon.com/What-Your-Doctor-About-Circumcision/dp/0446678805/ref=nodl_
/r/MensRights08/01/20 09:13 PM
10

Look, I’m just using the tweet to raise awareness on this issue.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 06:01 PM
10

Im not sure how you can be against men’s rights in its entirety if you also oppose infant circumcision.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 05:52 PM
2

https://www.facebook.com/95926963131/posts/10158922803373132/?d=n
/r/MensRights07/01/20 05:48 AM
8

Alright buddy. Alright.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 01:31 AM
11

I wasn’t even trying to make this a man vs women thing to be honest. In the future, I’ll definitely need to be more aware of how I word it. I guess using “people” for the post title would be better, but I really didn’t think about it. It was women talking, so I said women.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 08:04 PM
25

I hear what you're saying. That was not my intention. Obviously, I don't think it is okay for men or women to support removing components of children's penises. However, I personally have a unique level of hostility, whether rational or not, toward women who are protected by the state from genital alterations commenting on how they support infant boys having unnecessary and harmful genital operations. It just seems like the most profoundly hypocritical thinking imaginable.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 06:26 PM
2

Your telling me your mother and medical professionals didn’t realize excising genital structures off a child was damaging and wrong? You have to realize how absurd that sounds.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 02:38 PM
5

You didn't read his entire comment.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 11:32 PM
6

No, I really wasn't being an asshole. This is being an asshole - I think you really fucked up and made a decision for your child that was both ignorant and violating. Terrible parenting. Terrible judgement.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 08:53 PM
4

I'm in online groups where men have had hypospadias and chordee surgeries, and they wish it was never done to them. They think it's absolute bullshit. You're really going to trust the "professionals" who are routinely existing genital structures from children? I've been educated on why it is completely unnecessary, and I would need to write paragraphs and paragraphs of text to explain everything in detail. Nothing will be gained from having any further discussion though.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 08:48 PM
6

It was not absolutely necessary to have hypospadias "repair". You don't need chordee "repair" either. That is not accurate. In countries that don't circumcise, they don't mess with it because they know that it requires excising the highly innervated prepuce, and they weigh that against the minor condition of having your urethra in slightly different location. You made a decision for your son to have a penile modification surgery. You were sold on it being a critical thing to get done right away.…
/r/MensRights04/01/20 07:33 PM
10

I'm really hoping your son didn't get reconstructive surgery on his penis for hypospadias? Unfortunately, that is a condition where 9 times out of 10 it is better to just leave alone. The loss of erogenous tissue and traumatic experience for the child is not worth a small repositioning of the urethra. Doctors make it seem like your child will die if he doesn't get this surgery, so I know the pressure can be rough. However, it is in the same realm as routine infant circumcision. If it has to be d…
/r/MensRights04/01/20 07:08 PM
2

Damn, I actually meant to post this to the foreskin_restoration sub. Wasn’t paying enough attention I guess. Thanks.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 06:53 PM
2

Lol, is this satire?
/r/MensRights03/01/20 02:12 AM
4

https://twitter.com/briandavidearp/status/1212516628295872513?s=20
/r/MensRights03/01/20 01:41 AM
18

I am circumcised myself if that adds any context. You mention that you have no concrete memories of your infant circumcision. That is obviously the case for all of us cut as babies. However, there is rock solid, concrete evidence that pain and emotional turmoil experienced in infancy can have life long psychological consequences. It is one of the most critical times of development. I have seen enough circumcisions to know that it is torture. The infant has highly erogenous/specialized membrane t…
/r/MensRights02/01/20 11:26 PM
26

Normally that is not the case. However, this topic is obviously quite dividing. Many men are not ready to admit they were violated in such a profound way as a fragile infant.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 09:44 PM
4

Do you like the part where they excised genital structures from your penis as an infant?
/r/MensRights02/01/20 04:45 AM
2

Of course.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 01:29 AM
3

I got this from her personal FB page, and I can’t post a link to that.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 01:06 AM
13

I love how she believes “uncut” penis is dirty when she has a hole in her own body that discharges blood, smegma and whatever else is up in there. Unbelievable.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 01:56 AM
11

I know you are buddy, I know you are.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 05:46 AM
14

I am circumcised. I have truly no idea why a man would ever want a penis modification surgery. Important structures are removed off your genitals. Being happy you were strapped down like a farm animal and had parts of your penis cut off as a fragile infant is completely absurd and a position that stems from profound ignorance and an inability to be emotionally real with yourself. I won’t convince you though. I already know that.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 05:43 AM
13

More power to you man. Being a cuck isn’t for everyone, but I support you.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 05:19 AM
15

A circumcision removes genital structures from the penis such as the prepuce, frenulum and ridged band. Somehow, beyond any possible sound rational, this has been normalized in certain societies. The “procedure” removes highly erogenous and functional components. Tissue that produces erotic sensations and erotic satisfaction. Can you see how perverse that is to remove from a child? Most men would never in a million years remove such valuable tissue. Never. They don’t want penis modifications. To…
/r/MensRights24/12/19 05:17 AM
31

I’d like to take this opportunity to offer some additional insight. The following information is quite dense but comprehensive. First off, you mention that at 5 years old you were circumcised because of difficulty retracting your foreskin. In the past, a certain percentage of physicians in both the US and UK believed that the foreskin (prepuce) was supposed to retract in young children and infants. This is now widely known to be completely false and resulted in many unnecessary circumcisions. In…
/r/MensRights24/12/19 02:25 AM
75

Absolutely.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 08:05 PM
7

You think a Mom who tells her son the reality of infant circumcision is playing any games? She regrets her decision, it is painful for her, and she told her son exactly what she facilitated. It’s not a joke to them. It’s a burden for the whole family. Your response shows no maturity or understanding. Ironically, you’re the one who comes across as a juvenile.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 08:46 PM
4

An infant circumcision is a operation where specialized and highly erogenous genital structures such as the prepuce, frenulum and ridged band are excised from a baby’s penis.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 05:48 PM
14

They are not being used. I’m done trying to explain that though. It’s just wildly inaccurate. It’s really a human rights narrative than strictly political as well. If you saw a young boy who was a slave protesting slavery, would you say his parents are forcing him to push a political narrative? It’s just outright comical at this point. The boy got his damn penis mutilated as an infant, and he is not happy. He can protest all he wants.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 05:44 PM
20

This opposition to kids protesting is beyond me at this point. It would be one thing if the parents literally dragged the kids a long like my parents dragged me to church, but they aren’t even doing that. The boy is on camera articulating why he is there and the sister says she wants to support him. They know exactly what’s going on and have a greater understanding of anatomy than most adults. He is straight up like “my penis was cut at birth and I’m here protesting it”. And the sister goes, “I’…
/r/MensRights21/12/19 05:38 PM
6

So you believe there are individuals out there that will harm young children over peacefully protesting infant circumcision? This isn’t some crazy slugfest. They walk back and forth on the street and talk to pedestrians lol. I think you have a totally different picture of what is going on.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 04:34 PM
10

If the parents thought that their child was going to get harmed, you really think they would bring them? Also, these specific kids are really invested in this issue. I watched a video of them speaking about it. They aren’t playing around.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 04:25 PM
15

They want to be there... they think it’s human rights violation and are trying to raise awareness. I just watched a video of them talking about it. No one is forcing them to do anything. It’s a very important issue to them.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 04:22 PM
1

Lol, come on dude. You should know my account by now... it’s satire 😂
/r/MensRights19/12/19 09:19 PM
8

I wasn’t even comparing them.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 02:25 AM
17

Something that has been normalized can still be wrong. We are taught this lesson many times throughout the course of our lives. An example of this would be slavery in the United States. A significant portion of the country for many years thought it was perfectly acceptable to own and control human beings who they believed to be lesser. We are able to see that for what it is now, but the people who are in the bubble where it is going on don’t have the same framework.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 01:54 AM
-4

I don’t think I’ll do any research. I’m not really one of the thinking types.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 11:01 PM
31

There are hundreds of videos on YouTube of African tribal circumcisions where they literally skin the entire penis of 16 year old boys. Their penis looks like it came out of meat grinder. The boys are literally standing up with no pain meds while it happens. If they flinch, their families are fined and the boys are shamed. That almost reads like satire but it is the damn truth. This penis mutilation stuff is quite wicked and evil.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 10:45 PM
-6

P.S. I’ll probably have my son’s penis cut because I was. I just feel it’s best. It be what it be.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 10:39 PM
37

You don’t have the full picture on what is removed by circumcision. In America, the anatomy of an intact penis was somehow lost to the general public and medical community. Circumcision removes highly erogenous structures such as the prepuce, ridged band and frenulum. These are not trivial components and have a major impact on sensation and stimulatory functionality. When you remove these structures, you are taking away a majority of the erotic membrane tissue on the penis and leaving the remain…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 09:52 PM
17

I didn’t see the photo at the end until you mentioned it. That is stomach curling. His penis is skinned nearly to the base and blood is everywhere. He was completely butchered. It is a profoundly disturbing sight, and she still goes on to say she doesn’t regret it! How can you see that and not die inside. I’m waiting for a strong organization or group to begin challenging this publicly. The doctors and parents who participate in this need to be stopped. Absolutely satanic.
/r/MensRights15/12/19 05:32 PM
12

Mate, nearly all of us on this sub are fucking cut. No adult man here is insecure about having an intact penis.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 06:52 AM
5

Most of the Jewish circumcisons already happen at a home. Some Orthodox Jews even have a ritual where the person cutting will suck the penis afterward to “cleanse” it. I am not making this up. There are babies that have died after getting herpes from this. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/herpes-babies-jewish-circumcision-ritual-link-rabbis-infants-a7620446.html%3Famp
/r/MensRights10/12/19 05:57 AM
15

If my religious practice included cutting off children’s ears, it would not be tolerated. There is obviously a line both legally and morally to what can be tolerated.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 10:54 PM
14

How is that incorrect?
/r/MensRights09/12/19 10:10 PM
19

Excising the prepuce, frenulum and ridged band off an infant is mutilation. The title is accurate.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 09:34 PM
11

He’s an infant lol. Can’t even talk
/r/MensRights09/12/19 08:52 PM
6

I simply can’t support that position. It’s one thing to accept what was done and appreciate your penis for what it is, but you are saying you’re glad you were mutilated at birth. That is just too extreme for me. Take care.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 08:13 PM
1

The genitals aren’t shown. I posted a video on Facebook awhile back of a baby getting circumcised to raise awareness and it got taken down right away. It was the most brutal circ video I have ever seen where the baby was screaming full blast for minutes until he passed out. The doctor was literally laughing with the Dad about it. However, I reuploaded after covering the genitals in each frame manually and it wasn’t taken down.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 06:29 PM
12

Yes, you have some remaining amount of erogenous tissue left on your penis. Infant circumcision ablates between 40% and 70% of the total amount of membrane tissue on the penis. I am also circumcised, and I get some pleasure, but I’m also honest with myself enough that I can identify what was done to me as mutilation and that I lost a lot of sensation and entire anatomical structures.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 05:10 PM
13

You have no understanding of the anatomy. You’re just trying to justify what was done to you by trivializing what is actually being removed. Calling the prepuce, frenulum and ridged band just “useless skin” has no basis in reality. The sole purpose of those components is to provide erotic stimulation and keep the shaft and glans protected.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 05:02 PM
15

Infant circumcision is violently disfiguring the penis. An infant is strapped down and highly erogenous and specialized genital structures such as the prepuce, frenulum and ridged band are excised from the penis. I’m not sure why having parts of your penis off makes it “prettier”. You could potentially last longer because you had huge quantities of important tissue removed giving you less stimulation.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 04:39 PM
11

Nah man, go look up a circumcision being performed on YT. They scream bloody murder. Highly erogenous genital structures like the prepuce, frenulum and ridged band are getting excised off their penis. It’s the highest level of torture.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 06:24 AM
10

Yes, I know the process all too well. I’m not sure how the people who perform this delude themselves. It is just too obvious that it’s a a violent and heinous penis mutilation ritual.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 12:03 AM
4

Brother K’s Facebook
/r/MensRights08/12/19 11:56 PM
3

Yes, there is significant evidence that psychologically and/or physically harmful events at any age can cause negative neurological adaptations. In addition, there is clear evidence that infancy is a unique time for neurological development and that the negative consequences of trauma during this period can be more extreme than during other periods of development or adulthood. Here is a primer from the Harvard Neuroscience institute that will introduce you to this concept. It ironically even men…
/r/MensRights06/12/19 08:12 PM
2

First off, why would you want a penis modification surgery that removes highly erogenous and functional structures? It seems like you’re just completely ignoring this facet. Second, have you thought about how early infancy penile trauma might affect the trajectory of neurological development? There is no concrete memory, but you have all that trauma during a critical period of brain growth.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 07:55 PM
3

What is excised is not even a singular construct. There is no logical reason to be glad that functional and erogenous structures were cut off your penis as a fragile newborn.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 06:55 PM
5

Routinely removing a small amount of skin off a baby sounds bad on its face. However, you are trivializing what is actually happening in a profound way. This “procedure” excises highly erogenous and specialized membrane structures from the penis such as the prepuce, frenulum and ridged band. This is not trivial in any way. It is extremely violent, barbaric and very damaging both physically and psychologically. Many Americans are completely brainwashed into thinking this isn’t heinous genital mut…
/r/MensRights06/12/19 06:26 PM
13

Being happy that functional and erogenous components of your penis were chopped off as a newborn in a routine “operation” is not mentally sound. I myself am circumcised, and I thought the same way as you in the past. My previous position was devoid of any semblance of critical thought. I just told myself “circumcised is better”, and I stopped my mind from exploring any deeper. My ego had to split in half before I could understand this from a different perspective. If you were cut as an infant, i…
/r/MensRights06/12/19 04:22 PM
10

The only reason someone would be glad they had a routine penis modification surgery at birth was if they had no capacity to critically think about what was done to them. This routine “procedure” excises highly erogenous and specialized genital membrane structures such as the prepuce, frenulum and ridged band off a fragile infants penis.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 04:07 PM
-13

I’m circumcised and I’m fine though... not sure what the problem is
/r/MensRights03/12/19 07:40 PM
26

We are talking about a penis modification surgery that excises highly erogenous and specialized membrane structures such as the prepuce, frenulum and ridged band from an infant. You have a total lack of understanding of the anatomy and how violent the “procedure” is. Is there any critical thought you are putting forward to understanding this better? It is an extremely important issue.
/r/MensRights01/12/19 09:30 PM
16

Why in 2019 would you “Ok Boomer” your sons penis...
/r/MensRights01/12/19 04:49 PM
3

Okay, I see now what you meant.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 07:09 PM
7

Both practices revolve around excising genital structures from juveniles. In addition, partial or full prepuce excision is the most common type of genital modification that is made in ritual circumcision for both girls and boys. From my optics, the similarities are profound.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:51 PM
625

This woman is way, way out of her lane. How can someone possibly trivialize forced infant penile trauma?
/r/MensRights25/10/19 12:01 AM
3

Vaseline
/r/MensRights22/10/19 02:54 PM
34

“One of the rules was to generously apply Vaseline” Can you imagine your parents rubbing Vaseline up and down your penis after it has just been mutilated... absolutely insane.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 11:31 PM
6

Bye.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 05:29 PM
16

It’s interesting that woman have a hole in their body lined with the same type of mucosal tissue as foreskin that discharges blood, mucus and smegma, and we never seem to complain about that too much. Obviously, for women, they would rather keep the tissue. However, with men, there is no problem removing it...? Makes no sense. At all.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 04:43 PM
3

It’s not just skin though. The underside of the foreskin is mucosal membrane tissue like what is on your glans. The “procedure” takes off a majority of the erogenous tissue on the penis and leaves the remaining membrane to keratinze and dry out. The only reason you would thank your parents is if you were completely clueless on the anatomy and what is being done.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 04:39 PM
13

Welcome to the club. If you are not already a part of it, there is a Discord server called “Forefront” full of young men who feel the same way. They have a lot of info on restoring as well if you’re looking to get into that. It can really help, especially if your circ is tight. Anyway, I can send you an invite to the server if you’d like. Take care of yourself man because you have to battle a lot of demons with this.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 04:06 AM
1

Alright. Take care.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 08:22 PM
1

What is the typical experience for a man who has been genitally mutilated at birth in your opinion? I personally have felt completely psychotic over this after learning about the anatomical significance of the structures that were excised from my own penis. When I looked into how violent the procedure is, I felt even more violated. When I went to go talk with others about it, I was shamed and belittled. I’m not suicidal, but I can see how it comes to be. Check out this story of a man who also co…
/r/MensRights20/10/19 08:05 PM
15

We desperately need to educate American men on penile anatomy. They (we) were flat out genitally mutilated at birth. We were strapped down and had sexual structures such as prepuce, ridged band and frenulum violently ablated off our fragile infant body. Routine infant circumcision needs to be made illegal Legal framework needs to be created allowing men to sue for compensation. Criminal charges are brought against medical professionals responsible for the mutilations That is the bare minimum. Yo…
/r/MensRights20/10/19 06:48 PM
3

Ya, I experience quite severe trauma from having been cut as an infant. I just have a lot of physical damage, and I also just feel really violated sexually by the whole thing. Anyway, the last girl I was with said “thank god you’re circumcised” the minute my pants came off. I couldn’t believe it. This was at the absolute peak of my trauma with this shit. I just can’t unravel for the life of me why woman prefer a man who has sexual structures excised from his penis. If they are trying to say it’s…
/r/MensRights20/10/19 03:58 AM
8

You can read more about him here - https://www.yourwholebaby.org/jonathon Also, https://youtu.be/EUE_t_khAAI
/r/MensRights20/10/19 02:56 AM
14

Yes, they have many, many sources. However, upon looking into the “studies” in depth, everything falls apart like a house of cards. It is profound what they have gotten away with. The entirety of Europe thinks it is comical what they try to claim. Here is one breakdown from a bioethicist at Yale - http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2012/05/when-bad-science-kills-or-how-to-spread-aids/ However, “health benefits” becomes irrelevant when you acknowledge that children are being strapped down and h…
/r/MensRights20/10/19 02:35 AM
6

Yes - https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201120120AB768
/r/MensRights20/10/19 02:14 AM
17

Why do you think getting specialized and highly erogenous genital structures excised off your penis in a profoundly violent manner is insignificant? Let’s hear it.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 02:02 AM
4

Ya, I certainly didn’t care either until I looked into the anatomy and then watched an educational video of an uncut (intact) man highlighting the components I didn’t have and demonstrating the functionality. Then, I watched videos of infant circumcisions, and my mind was blown at how heinously violent it was. Like something out a saw movie. Still can’t believe that it happened to me. I only found one with topical anesthesia and it didn’t even work very well. They just scream bloody murder the w…
/r/MensRights20/10/19 12:25 AM
7

How could there be zero physical signs after a circumcision? Entire structures were excised from your penis...
/r/MensRights19/10/19 11:17 PM
47

At 8:00 min in you can see a man named Jonathon Conte briefly give a statement. 5 years later he committed suicide from depression and psychosis over his infant circumcision.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 11:13 PM
6

I would say a majority of the users on this sub are largely opposed to routine infant circumcision.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 10:05 PM
2

Alright. It certainly is a right, but it doesn’t fit into any sane moral framework. We shouldn’t be asking each other to cut off genital tissue for sexual preferences.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 07:35 PM
1

You should. I’m the admin of a server of a 300+ intactivists. Mostly young men. I see you speaking out against Circ a lot, and I think you would appreciate the community. Eric Clopper and Brendon Marotta are in the server as well. I’ll pm you a link to the twitter thread and an invite to the server.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 07:20 PM
1

Are you in the Forefront discord server?
/r/MensRights19/10/19 06:54 PM
1

The mods will remove the post if I don’t. I’ll pm you the thread.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 04:05 PM
6

Penis modification surgeries that remove highly erogenous and specialized genital structures from infant boys is the biggest issue of the MRA movement.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 04:04 PM
44

Sure. Circumcision removes specialized and highly erogenous membrane structures from the penis such as the prepuce, ridged band and frenulum. Removing the prepuce also allows for the remaining shaft and glans membrane tissue to keratinize. Essentially, this means that the tissue dries out and hardens. In a nutshell, circumcision diminishes the sensations one can feel with their penis. Often, quite drastically. Therefore, there is a rapidly growing movement that opposes the practice being done to…
/r/MensRights19/10/19 03:27 PM
17

Ta ta, Coach.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 02:51 PM
7

Ya, I see your point.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 02:41 PM
28

What is insane about being opposed to men getting highly erogenous and specialized genital structures cut off their penis for no damn reason? It is a bizarre and damaging practice. There should be no penile modifications going on barring dire medical need like gangrene.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 02:30 PM
33

I posted this to highlight an example of a woman who pressures men into getting circumcised. My opinion is that circumcision diminishes the penis. Often, quite significantly. I don’t think highly erogenous and specialized genital structures such as the prepuce, ridged band and frenulum should ever be excised from a man barring dire medical need such as gangrene, frostbite, cancer, and a very few other cases. We should encourage a culture that navigates away from penis modifications for men as so…
/r/MensRights19/10/19 02:26 PM
30

I wonder, what is a subtle way of asking a woman if she is circumcised? Without sounding impudent of course.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 01:21 PM
21

The mods will remove my post if I don’t. I’ll pm you a link to the thread.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 12:43 AM
25

No, she is a nurse and actually assists in circumcisions. I’ll pm you a link to the thread.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 10:09 PM
4

Ya man, that is awful to hear. You should have never done that. I’m sure that is what you were told though, and you didn’t know better. Foreskin isn’t designed to be retractable at that age. It is fused to the glans and shaft. By pulling it back, you were ripping the membrane and causing micro tears. This is how people develop phimosis later in life.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 02:30 AM
4

Nah man, paraphimosis is not what you described. That is where the foreskin gets trapped behind the glans. This would only happen to a child if the foreskin was forcibly retracted which is unfortunately also very common in the US due to rampant misinformation. Although, people are becoming more aware.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 02:24 AM
7

The foreskin isn’t able to trap the growth of the penis. I believe the condition your referring to is phimosis. This is where the foreskin is fused to the glans and shaft. However, this is the normal state of the penis for many years. Between the ages of 10-18 is where it should be begin to retract. In the US, many doctors are misinformed and simply have a impossibly quick trigger finger for recommending circumcision. Not to be dramatic, but it is actually a profound problem. In many other count…
/r/MensRights12/10/19 02:09 AM
1

I didn’t look into the YT channel. If I create my own YT channel and upload the video, will it be acceptable to repost?
/r/MensRights06/10/19 02:50 AM
1

This post doesn’t fall under that category, and we both know that. However, I understand why it was removed.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 02:45 AM
22

I agree. I’m cranking these posts out all day though, and I sometimes get a little lazy. Check out my post history
/r/MensRights06/10/19 02:22 AM
7

Awesome 👌🏼
/r/MensRights06/10/19 12:41 AM
12

Check out my post history
/r/MensRights06/10/19 12:34 AM
3

Makes complete sense. I can tell you have given this some intense thought.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 09:22 PM
13

It’s not that there is no pleasure. You still have erogenous tissue left on your penis. However, a variable amount of erotic tissue has been excised. In American Infant circumcisions, we generally see between 40% to 70% of the total amount of innervated membrane tissue on the penis removed. I’m not interested in trying to convince you though that your penis was diminished. It is obviously very subjective. You don’t sound bothered by it. However, you also don’t sound like you understand the anato…
/r/MensRights05/10/19 07:47 PM
13

The foreskin is heavily involved in facilitating and providing sexual pleasure for a man. If that is of low priority for you, then I can understand why you believe it has little purpose.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 07:38 PM
11

That sucks. The foreskin is a great part of the penis. Treating the root of the issue seems like a better solution than amputation of tissue. Just doesn’t add up to me to be honest. We’re too advanced for such primitive “medicine”. The bacterial biome of your penis was off, so they just removed the tissue? I guess that is a solution, but I just think it’s very invasive. Seems odd that bladder infections and bacterial biome imbalances in women are not treated by excising genital membrane tissue..…
/r/MensRights05/10/19 07:29 PM
21

Routine / Ritual Infant circumcision takes place all the time in Europe. However, it is usually limited to religious groups such as the Jews and Muslims. With that being said, there are some regions where it is still practiced, although very rarely, for non religious reasons.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 07:21 PM
3

I’ll agree with that.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 06:16 PM
23

How is excising tissue from an infants penis similar to giving a name?
/r/MensRights05/10/19 06:04 PM
1

I understand. I’ll avoid that in the future.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 04:15 PM
10

Alright.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 01:13 AM
15

Circumcision is a genital modification procedure that removes specialized structures such as the prepuce, ridged band and some or all of the frenulum from the penis.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 01:10 AM
10

Do you not think it should be exposed and discussed?
/r/MensRights05/10/19 01:01 AM
3

There is no targeted attack on Jews and Muslims. You're making this all about you.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 07:24 PM
8

How old were you?
/r/MensRights04/10/19 06:31 PM
3

No choice. The mods will delete the post if I don’t as it goes against a explicit reddit policy.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 06:30 PM
6

What do you think the Jews would do if it was made illegal to routinely/religiously circumcise?
/r/MensRights27/09/19 02:40 PM
10

What do you believe is going to happen if you don’t cut your hypothetical sons penis?
/r/MensRights27/09/19 06:48 AM
12

How in the actual fuck did cutting highly specialized genital structures off humans ever become a thing...
/r/MensRights20/09/19 03:18 PM
33

Parents are able to just cut up their sons penis to whatever degree they want? That is actually the state of affairs right now in the United States and many other places around the world. Removing genital structures from a infants penis, barring a dire medical need, is a criminal offense of the highest caliber. It's time we start treating it that way.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 08:26 PM
7

Routine neonatal circumcision is a high order crime. That is the only logical conclusion that can be drawn. It is our duty as civilized human beings to look into this profound issue. To remain silent is an abuse in itself. This is a black and white topic. Either it is wrong or right and there is no wiggle room. Excising specialized genital structures routinely from a child could not fall further into the wrong side of things.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/19 05:33 PM
9

Routine neonatal circumcision is a high order crime. That is the only logical conclusion that can be drawn. It is our duty as civilized human beings to look into this profound issue. To remain silent is an abuse in itself. This is a black and white topic. Either it is wrong or right and there is no wiggle room. Excising specialized genital structures routinely from a child could not fall further into the wrong side of things.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 05:30 PM
16

You had a bad case of phimosis. Likely, this was because your parents forcibly retracted you as a infant and child. That is primary way in which it develops and unfortunately that was what many parents were taught to do by healthcare professionals until recently. With this being said, a healthy foreskin is a highly stimulating/pleasurable part of the penis. It has a ton of value and is in now way trivial. Things did not work out for you but that isn’t the case for most men.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 12:20 AM
9

Your penis was mutilated at birth.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 06:04 AM
23

Great. Glad to hear it.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 05:10 AM
24

Strapping an infant down to a circumstraint and excising specialized genital structures like the prepuce, ridged band and frenulum is much different than the examples you mentioned. That is mutilation in my eyes. The actual definition of mutilation does not account for intent.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 03:21 AM
2

This is the cause that will elevate the men’s rights movement to the highest level. How you cannot see that is honestly fascinating to me.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 02:43 AM
3

A cleft lip is a defect. Foreskin is an important part of the penis with a clear function and purpose.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 02:41 AM
26

I think we’re done here.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 02:30 AM
24

What is so funny?
/r/MensRights14/07/19 02:21 AM
31

What it means is many boys in the US are genitally mutilated at birth. They have early infancy penile trauma. It is an awful introduction into this world and the consequences are lifelong.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 02:21 AM
40

Many infant boys in the country are strapped down and have their penis mutilated. Those next weeks are torture for them, and they grow up with an important part of their penis missing. That is definitely not a comfortable introduction into this world.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 02:19 AM
37

It should be obvious what the point is.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 02:13 AM
2

Infant circumcision is very bad. It’s genital mutilation. You’re ignorant of the anatomy. The government has a duty to protect its citizens. Only fools want their children cut routinely.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 02:10 AM
3

It will be stopping soon. All of Europe doesn’t circumcise. The rate is dropping rapidly in the US. More dialogue is happening around this topic. More men are coming out and saying they are upset. You’re pretty ignorant to what is occurring right now.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 01:30 AM
3

80% of the world has an intact and complete penis. How could you possibly be that clueless...?
/r/MensRights14/07/19 01:19 AM
3

Why does an intact penis look nasty? It looks exactly how a penis is naturally supposed to look. A cut penis looks like it has had significant structures and tissue taken from it and scarred. Do you even have a basic understanding of the anatomy?
/r/MensRights13/07/19 03:59 PM
1

I don’t agree with you. At all. We can leave it at that.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 05:55 AM
1

Why exactly do you love about your circumcision? Just a very perverse thing to say from my optics? You enjoy having specialized tissue removed from your penis? Doesn’t make any sense.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 05:38 AM
4

Well, there is no getting around the fact that circumcision removes significant specialized genital structures from the penis like the prepuce, ridged band and frenulum. Not many adult men who would want to part with those for any reason. The mechanics of sex change when you excise the mobile skin system. Sensory feedback is altered for the worse. It’s just not natural. Removing that is mutilation.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 05:36 AM
4

Makes no sense. I certainly don’t support your line of thinking. Men shouldn’t want to mutilate their penis.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 05:06 AM
11

No, it shouldn’t be your right to mutilate a child. It’s an embarrassment to this country that we haven’t come together yet and banned this practice. I don’t expect everyone to understand. Heck, it took me years before I could grasp the reality. However, after peeling back the veil, what I found terrified me to my core. This is serious genital mutilation. There are significant consequences. It is a criminal act to do this. I will die on that hill.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 04:35 AM
7

Well, your logic doesn’t even hold up. Do you think we should protect stoning gays because it is deemed acceptable in the Bible? Where do you draw the line.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 03:01 AM
4

Come one dude. Specialized genital structures like the prepuce, ridged band and frenulum are excised by circumcision. That is sick to do to an infant. It's genital mutilation. I'm not comfortable with that happening everyday to more children. Neither are many other Americans. When you acquire a spine, maybe you can join us.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 02:39 AM
27

Yes, I looked into the anatomy of intact penises when I was studying the harmful effects of circumcision. I’m cut myself, and I think an intact penis looks natural, normal and healthy. Pretty much exactly how a penis should look with all its parts,
/r/MensRights13/07/19 12:16 AM
19

Neonatal circumcision ablates specialized structures from the penis like the prepuce, ridged band and frenulum. These are primary erogenous areas on the penis. The gravity of this “procedure” warrants consent from the individual it is happening to.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 02:44 AM
3

https://community.babycenter.com/post/a73551875/circumcision-yes-or-no-why-or-why-not
/r/MensRights08/07/19 09:48 PM
59

Parents hand their infants sons over to be stripped naked, strapped to a board (circumstraint) and have specialized genital structures like the prepuce, ridged band and frenulum excised from their fragile body. Absolute insanity.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 08:47 PM
2

No.
/r/MensRights30/06/19 01:14 PM
12

Calling the mobile skin system on the penis a useless flap of skin is just not logically sound. You're completely unaware of the anatomy, but you have the confidence to trivialize it to be nothing? What is the frenlulum, ridged band and prepuce? These are all significant structures commonly completely excised by neonatal circumcision. Why exactly are you happy this was done to you as an infant?
/r/MensRights29/06/19 04:20 AM
21

This is extreme cultural conditioning going on. Boys should not be seeking out penis modification surgeries. That is not healthy for the mind or body. I think you should reflect on this practice. I’m not trying to belittle your culture, but I hope you can one day see this in a different light.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 06:54 AM
24

It’s not acceptable to be removing genital structures from a child without dire medical need. I know for a fact that they are essentially forcing it on your people by telling very young boys that they will not be men unless they do this. They drill this into your head. The men say it. The women say it. Your own parents say it. You’re brainwashed. However, I will acknowledge that the circumcisions they do in the Philippines are often much less invasive than what they do to infants in the US. Some…
/r/MensRights28/06/19 06:27 AM
27

Are you talking about the boy in the photo?
/r/MensRights28/06/19 05:53 AM
5

Yes, many in the Intactivist community have. Her exact words to me were “you mad your parents cut your wee wee? It’s a medical procedure. Get over it.” There is your answer.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 05:56 AM
10

Did you even read the article? There is absolutely no reason it needs to be done. Surgery is a last resort for a serious problem.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 12:33 AM
17

Your penis was mutilated at birth. Sexual structures were excised off your genitals. You might want to look into the anatomy of the frenulum, ridged band and prepuce.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 10:10 PM
20

Check out this article posted by a woman in Vogue the other day about infant circumcision. You will be blown away. Scroll down on the page for the English version.- https://www.vogue.de/kultur/artikel/juedisch-heute-mirna-funk-ueber-das-ritual-der-beschneidung?fbclid=IwAR13XF0s2rNP35_Dyyxo-Np98eR3CdqQXoHZQ9n1DlXi3tn8HS17U9IUSN4
/r/MensRights24/06/19 08:00 PM
47

That is according to the studies funded by pro circumcision special interest groups of course.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 06:12 PM
20

In all fairness, these women are actually not advocating for juvenile circumcision. They are fighting for the right to be able to get cut at 18+. The type of female circumcision that is done in their culture is essentially a labiaplasty and partial or full excision of the clitoral hood. However, the clitoris is also sometimes directly affected. FGM activists are pressuring for a total ban at any age for tribal circumcisions.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 02:41 PM
18

Me too
/r/MensRights27/05/19 03:16 AM
3

Infant circumcisions in the US have traditionally been done quite “tight” where the penis is left taut and immobile when erect. Essentially, the entire mucosal membrane mobile skin system is ablated. This would have made masturbation much more difficult if not impossible without any lubricant. However, there is a wide spectrum to the degree of invasiveness for infant circumcision. Some are left with looser cuts and frenulum intact while others get very tight cuts with the frenulum totally gouged…
/r/MensRights27/04/19 09:05 PM
13

Doobie, you hop on every single one of my circumcision awareness posts and make a stupid comment where you get downvoted to oblivion. Why do this to yourself?
/r/MensRights12/04/19 07:20 PM
15

Imagine a man who cuts the genitals of infant girls telling a woman who had her genitals cut as an infant to “get over it”.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 07:05 PM
12

I’d argue that the main factor here is not consent but rather that it is heinous genital mutilation when done to an infant. They brutally rip off a sexual structure from a baby. The majority of the public seems to believe consent matters little when it comes to vaccines for children because they think it to be medically beneficial. They think the same way about circumcision but are dead wrong.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 06:00 PM
4

In the end, the reality is you’re right This is a sick world lads.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 07:23 AM
5

Nah man, I talked with the mother on Twitter. She was heavily misguided by her family, her community and the medical establishment. They all pressured her intensely. Sometimes, the parent is largely to blame but this isn’t one of those times. She was getting attacked from all angles to do this. It makes you wonder, why as a society we are so hell bent on cutting infants?
/r/MensRights12/04/19 07:19 AM
1

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 06:45 AM
8

Why exactly are you glad you were circumcised at birth?
/r/MensRights11/04/19 06:43 AM
8

Nah man, that ain’t it at all. This came from a private FB group I’m in where all these upcoming / new mothers gather to get information on why not circumcising their son is the best option. Has 30k members. It’s called YourWholeBaby. This is the opposite of not caring for men.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 05:32 AM
4

Michael, infants do die from circumcision. It is from blood loss. There are different forms of circumcision as you might be aware. Some doctors perform the more invasive types on infants where the entirety of the mobile skin system and some or most of the frenulum is excised. It is unfortunately quite common. This is called a full sleeve ablation circumcision. From what I’ve gathered, these are the circumcisions that infants are most likely to die from. The bleeding becomes uncontrollable. Most …
/r/MensRights21/03/19 06:48 PM
43

Men’s genitals are getting treated like absolute garbage in the United States. The rest of the modern world is not excising sexual structures from infants and the intact elderly men are getting proper treatment. Both intact and cut men are losing in this country.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 05:56 PM
12

I see. The cultural conditioning is very strong in America. I myself was cut as an infant, but I looked into the anatomical significance of the structure they excise and also watched a few infant circumcision videos, and I definitely understand now that this something that should never be done to a fragile infant. It’s genital mutilation beyond any doubt. Infant Circumcision Video - https://youtu.be/6c4Yq0nqhhA Educational Foreskin Anatomy Video - https://youtu.be/s6on8BsMrsg
/r/MensRights18/03/19 07:03 AM
12

You just said you know it’s fucked up?
/r/MensRights18/03/19 06:00 AM
3

This is in the Philippines. The most commonly-done procedure is in actuality not a circumcision but a dorsal slit, where no foreskin is actually removed. When the foreskin is removed, it is commonly known locally as a "German cut" in reference to the appearance of the German helmets worn by soldiers during WWII.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 09:57 PM
5

Often, it is women performing the circumcisions in Africa. Although, that is not always the case. I will try to find a source, but I have seen many videos. The men just bus them in. Update: Here is one source - https://www.intrahealth.org/vital/tanzania-medical-circumcision-services-rely-predominantly-female-nursing-workforce It’s like a profession for them. Women are being trained to cut men en masse as a career over there.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 09:19 PM
9

Additional comments on FB post - https://imgur.com/a/KvMMaRC
/r/MensRights15/03/19 05:47 PM
29

A busload of boys heading for "free circumcisions" paid for by the United States via the CDC's scheme to circumcise African males "voluntarily". These boys have no idea what will be done to them today, only that the Americans promise it will prevent them from getting diseases. They are too young to be taught condom use, so they will be circumcised and released, believing they are protected by the American cure-all. The U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) has spent billions o…
/r/MensRights15/03/19 03:07 PM
7

If there are any benefits, they are trivial at best and come at the cost of excising an entire sexual structure, the prepuce, off the penis. In America, the medical community assigns no value to this component of the penis. However, it is considered by many to be some of most innervated tissue on the penis. Often, in an infant circumcision in America, the frenulum is also excised or partially excised and this is definitely the primary erogenous zone on the penis. A study published in the British…
/r/MensRights14/03/19 06:54 PM
1

I see.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 02:22 AM
7

You’re right. I don’t think I am. I’m an intactivist, and I primarily focus on ending routine infant circumcision. I believe this to be a massive but relatively unknown crises in America and the true consequences are often obscured. However, I’m interested in learning more on why you think Yang will strip certain freedoms away. Could you extrapolate on that a bit if you have some time to educate?
/r/MensRights14/03/19 01:34 AM
0

What?
/r/MensRights14/03/19 12:19 AM
5

This is his official statement on gun control for anyone interested - https://www.yang2020.com/policies/gun-safety/
/r/MensRights13/03/19 10:24 PM
1

Sounds good 👌🏼
/r/MensRights12/03/19 04:57 AM
2

You are describing the most severe and least common form of female genital cutting. Do you understand that more severe forms of male genital cutting exist in Africa than just circumcision? Most female cutting in Africa is trimming or a nick of the clitoral hood and/or trimming of labia tissue. It could be argued that a typical male circumcision in infancy in the US is more invasive than what I just mentioned. Juvenile genital cutting practices on both sexes deserve the utmost attention. Culture …
/r/MensRights08/03/19 08:10 PM
10

That is not the case. It should be obvious if you go and reread it.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 09:32 PM
8

In what way?
/r/MensRights06/03/19 09:26 PM
7

My mental health disorder? What would that be?
/r/MensRights06/03/19 08:19 PM
11

What part do you agree with?
/r/MensRights06/03/19 05:01 PM
2

I created a disorder server for young men who are struggling with being circumcised. There are a few women in there as well that can provide some one on one support. A lot of men are finding this helpful. Let me know if you have any questions - https://discord.gg/GrsmsNv
/r/MensRights04/03/19 02:49 PM
218

NSPCC - National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children
/r/MensRights01/03/19 07:54 PM
1

What age and what medical reasons? Just curious.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 07:05 PM
34

Women play their own role in the continuation of this practice. However, men who are circumcised will often develop a complex to want their son to be circumcised. It would be disingenuous to say otherwise. That is what I’ve discovered from studying this topic. Many estimations point to there being around 3,000 newborn circumcisions a day in the US as of right now. The rationale behind each one is highly varied. Many of these are not done for religious purposes. One thing in common though is that…
/r/MensRights26/02/19 09:18 PM
5

The absolute worst time to do a circumcision is in infancy. Such a delicate organ just getting treated like trash and hacked away at during the most fragile and innocent time of a humans life. It’s time to start considering the long term psychological complications of early infancy penile trauma. How is this affecting our society?
/r/MensRights24/02/19 07:12 PM
5

Respect. That is how to take control of the situation and make the best.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 12:44 AM
5

Really? You had a full sleeve ablation circumcision, and you restored it to a c6+? That is some impressive dedication. Must feel awesome knowing you mitigated a lot of damage.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 08:11 PM
8

Yes, I agree. However, as you know, some circumcisions only excise the prepuce. The more severe ones, although incredibly common for infant circumcisions in the US, excise a huge portion of the shaft mucosal membrane tissue as well. Men will oftentimes have scars way down the shaft. They often don’t know that 30 - 45 percent of the tissue on the shaft was ablated. Slowly, they are waking up.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 08:06 PM
5

You’re wrong. She explicitly meant that she liked the “tight” type of circumcision where more shaft mucosal membrane tissue is excised off the penis. There are different types of circumcision and the tight ones are the most invasive. Ironically, they are often only done on infants despite the severity. Here is a link that might help break this down. You will see that parents sometimes will choose different types of tissue ablation on the penis depending on their preference - https://www.healthli…
/r/MensRights23/02/19 04:21 PM
4

What do you mean?
/r/MensRights23/02/19 07:36 AM
8

Maybe you are not aware that there are multiple types of circumcisions. Men who have “tight” circumcisions have oftentimes had 30%-45% of the tissue on their shaft excised. She is implying she likes when it is “tight” and the most amount of tissue is removed and little mobility left remaining. Does this not sound very odd to you?
/r/MensRights23/02/19 07:07 AM
3

In reality, you just need to see a video to understand - https://youtu.be/6c4Yq0nqhhA
/r/MensRights17/02/19 06:27 PM
5

The foreskin is mucosal membrane tissue, like what lines a vagina with specialized structure such as the frenulum and ridged band. Americans have been lead to believe it is trivial. In fact, it is the most innervated part of the penis. Think of it as a sliding vagina on the shaft. A study in the British Journal of Urology concludes that circumcision often “ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis” -https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/17378847/ They are excising the most erogenous tissue o…
/r/MensRights17/02/19 06:17 PM
1

I'll send a pm.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 05:19 AM
2

You give them this link - https://www.healthline.com/health/parenting/loose-circumcision
/r/MensRights17/02/19 12:42 AM
3

https://www.healthline.com/health/parenting/loose-circumcision
/r/MensRights17/02/19 12:25 AM
5

Good luck with that.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 09:43 PM
43

It was essentially a piece promoting circumcision and making fun of intact penises. There is a reason you liked it. It is exactly what you wanted to hear to confirm the reality you constructed for yourself. Why don’t you look into intact anatomy or infant circumcision videos? There is a reason you never look deeper into that as well.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 09:26 PM
43

I’ve seen it. One of the more embarrassing videos a man has ever produced. The fact that you would include that as a reference further highlights my point.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 09:18 PM
68

Guys, this is a perfect example of why we need to make it illegal. The men who are circumcised as infants oftentimes develop a complex on this. It is a delusion, and they can’t see past it. We need to start actually protecting men’s rights. Especially the most fragile of us.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 09:15 PM
3

If you have a lot of inner skin left from the original cut, it can be pretty damn close. Frenulum is only one part of the equation as well. More men need to know these structures to gauge loss. I'm sure there would be a lot of furious individuals if they only knew. Seems to be many, many tight cut c1's in America. Also, if there is let's say 70 million cut men in America. How many are botched completely? Could be quite a few.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 05:37 AM
3

I hear you. I think restoring brings back quite a bit. However, based on what I know at an anatomical level, there is still a incredible depth to the degree of loss. Hate to be the downer though. I think a restored foreskin is a great accomplishment and adds a lot of sexual value and comfort. A c1 to a c5+ is a radically different sexual experience.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 04:49 AM
3

It's not the same at all. There is a specturm to the degree of cuts and structures excised such as the frenulum. Many men cut as infants have nearly half the skin (mucosal membrane tissue) ablated off their shaft. That takes years of stretching to grow back and is not innervated to the same degree as the mucosal tissue they remove. Can't grow back the ridged band and frenulum either.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 08:52 PM
1

They definitely are. Don’t worry about that.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 05:45 PM
7

Ah, then yes. Should just screw back on.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 04:55 AM
15

The men who were circumcised as infants can raise the MRA platform to the highest level. It is a assault on their body. No evidence to back it up. Straight pseudo science. It’s a human rights violation to excise this sexual structure without dire medical need. Women are fully protected from any type of genital cutting. And men? Literally nothing at all. You can cut your infants penis at your house on the kitchen table as long as you call it a circumcision. These men are getting strapped down and…
/r/MensRights15/02/19 04:48 AM
7

No, it will be decomposing by that point. Think of how the foreskin grows with the penis as well through maturity. Much, much larger in an adult.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 04:30 AM
1

Yes, I agree. 70 million men in the US cut as infants. Wild. Rates dropping dramatically on newborns though.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 03:56 PM
10

It is easy to spot a man who is circumcised and doesn’t want to acknowledge the truth.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 02:31 AM
17

I’m trying to raise awareness on this topic. I’m not paid. It is more of a sacrifice what I do. You think I am trying to rile up anti semetic thinking. That is clear to me. Couldn’t be more wrong. The Jews are hardly the problem here. They are only a component of why it persists. Deeper roots in America for infant genital cutting.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 02:10 AM
16

You should know that cutting innervated mucosal tissue off infant penises should be a crime. Whatever religion promotes this is less than scum off a homeless mans shoe.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 01:51 AM
17

No one here agrees with you.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 01:28 AM
15

It is easy to tell who is in denial about the gravity of infant circumcision.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 12:34 AM
10

Potential Increased SIDS risk - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/339465v1 Potential Increased risk of Autism and Hyperactivity - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530408/
/r/MensRights14/02/19 12:17 AM
18

It is early infancy penile trauma. A sexual type of trauma. Uniquely destructive to the mind.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 12:12 AM
15

Done.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 11:59 PM
11

Either you are actually 7 years old or the reality of your infant mutilation is causing you to act like this. Are you asking if I care about children not getting defiled at birth?
/r/MensRights13/02/19 06:49 PM
9

No downvoting here. We just feel bad you are suppressing your infant mutilation. We see how submissive you are toward your non consenting genital modification surgery and understand what is going on inside your head to say these things.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 06:28 PM
3

Yes, if you look at my post history, you will see one of my most recent posts highlights a study published in the British Journal of Urology that concludes circumcision “oftentimes ablates the most sensitive part of the penis”. That is definitely the angle to take. Think of how hard some men work to keep their sexual vigor and vitality up. Circumcision is the opposite of that. If only most knew.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 05:38 PM
7

This is a total troll post. Look at the meme closer. Look at my post history. I’m devastated that I’m circumcised. Once you look into the anatomical significance and function, you realize how profound of a loss it is. I’m not taking it well. Feel like less of a man. They took away a critical structure on my primary sensory organ. That’s how I view it.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 05:28 PM
21

I’m 100% trolling. It’s barbaric mutilation of the highest order.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 09:09 AM
11

My mom told me that she preferred it.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 08:59 AM
3

It lowers your penile cancer risk though
/r/MensRights13/02/19 08:07 AM
3

No, they don’t give a fuck.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 07:51 AM
15

Go on Twitter. Look it up. Many FGM victims are saying the same thing. “It’s cleaner” “Boys like it” How odd? Sounds familiar...
/r/MensRights13/02/19 07:06 AM
6

Right. Circumcision is like taking penis enhancing pills everyday. I encourage it aggressively to all my friends who are having sons.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 06:42 AM
2

I’m fine though. I’ve never researched anything, and I don’t plan on it. My mom told me it was best to have it done as a little boy when I couldn’t remember.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 06:35 AM
1

Totally. It makes your dick bigger as well.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 06:28 AM
10

I thought the meme would make it clear that I’m in agreement with that. I guess it wasn’t so clear. This is poking fun at the men who claim this.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 06:00 AM
4

Me too bro. Girls love it also.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 05:34 AM
4

There is a lot to find down this rabbit hole.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 12:13 AM
8

No, it is a type of on the spot questioning done in medical training. They were asking her questions on why they circumcise during the circumcision. Likely, to try and get her to somehow rationalize what they do in her head.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 11:12 PM
12

Ya, what about when they go home though? They just have a giant wound on their penis. Early infancy penile trauma. Probably fucks the whole brain up. Primes the mind for toxic inclinations. What about the permanent sexual loss? Not all men will deal with that effectively.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 08:00 PM
5

A man is really defined by his penis. That is the defining characteristic of masculinity from an anatomical standpoint. So, for some, you get that defiled in infancy to a degree. Those who have to get this done as adults for severe medical reasons are also losing out.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 04:26 PM
2

Even if your foreskin has to be removed for medical reasons, it is still a loss. Should be preserved and taken care of. It is an important structure. Shouldn’t just be excising innervated genital mucsal tissue so blazé. It’s very sad for these babies. Very heavy if you are aware of the depth to what they experience and the loss.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 07:24 AM
1

I understand what it is. I came across that knowledge before I posted this. Specifically sought it out. I think it is disgusting what she is doing. I think the act is despicable. I think it’s a systematic form of child abuse and those who do it are criminals. I thought it would be clever to put pimping in the title and phrase it in a way to portray the whole industry of circumcision in a negative light. Because it should be.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 07:07 AM
0

Yes. I am thinking in that way. Control of workers to mutilate children. There is no reason to routinely excise genital mucosal tissue from an infants penis. Cult mentality. That was the intention of the title. A play of words on “pimping”
/r/MensRights12/02/19 06:50 AM
0

Yes, I do.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 06:42 AM
9

This is not my paper... Now that we can confirm you have trauma from your infant circumcision, I would suggest you take things easy going forward.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 12:57 AM
7

It is difficult to explain, but I will try. Give me a little bit of time to think out the best way to explain.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 11:53 PM
14

The device used and 'style' of cut determine if the penis is made erect before the excision begins. You can see this in the the video linked below. It is a full sleeve ablation with erection induced -https://youtu.be/6c4Yq0nqhhA There is a huge variation in how infant circumcisions are performed. A spectrum to the severity and structures excised such as the frenulum and ridged band. You have a specific set of optics. When erection is induced, this is done when they apply the antiseptic. They use…
/r/MensRights11/02/19 10:13 PM
9

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847
/r/MensRights11/02/19 08:45 PM
48

Just a quick reminder - If you were circumcised as an infant, you were strapped down with your legs and arms restrained, your penis fondled to get it erect, and then they excised the most sensitive part of your penis off. Continue telling yourself "I'm glad it happened" because the alternative is you were violently mutilated and defiled during the most fragile time of your life. The ultimate act of submission as a man is to accept this without question. https://youtu.be/6c4Yq0nqhhA https://youtu…
/r/MensRights11/02/19 07:34 PM
26

Yes, there is a clear agenda in many parts of the world to promote circumcision. We should probably look into the historical reasons to understand better why it was started. When I did, it was unsurprising to me that it was all to decrease sensitivity in boys and limit their ability to masturbate properly. Why does it persist still? Delusion.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 07:08 PM
19

Yes, it definitely does. However, because infant circumcisions have such a spectrum to the degree of tissue excision and structures excised such as the frenulum and ridged band, one mans experience could be quite different from the next. What I have found is many men in America don't have a single mm of slack skin on their penis and it is tight like a broomstick. That is almost half the skin on their penis excised! All that skin is not even really skin but gential mucosal tissue. The same type o…
/r/MensRights11/02/19 06:56 PM
13

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847
/r/MensRights11/02/19 06:47 PM
4

We need to elevate this platform to a higher level. I will give this immense thought.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 02:00 AM
11

Yes, I agree. There was even a study on its innervation in the British Journal of Urology that concluded "circumcision ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847 Men need to support other men on this. Why are they not furious? They get strapped down, molested and then mutilated at the most fragile time of their life, and they say they like it? It is almost like a mental illness because the complexities are so profound to facilitate this type of th…
/r/MensRights10/02/19 11:49 PM
7

I agree. What is shocking is I am beginning to find out that a majority of infant circumcisions in the US are often times full sleeve ablations and leave little slack skin on the penis (anecdotal). They just excise all of the mucosa and make it tight like a broomstick. This is very disturbing. The adults who get circumcisions aren't even getting the same procedure. It is much less invasive. How do men not know yet in 2019? They are being mutilated on a widespread scale.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 11:39 PM
1

Has this been removed? Looked like new comments are still coming in. However, will repost again soon. That was a honest mistake on blanking out the names. Was doing it late at night and was not paying enough attention. Won't happen again.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 11:09 PM
15

MGM is more like clitoral hood removal. However, the foreskin has a much larger surface area and has an additional functional purpose of moving up and down the shaft stimulating the whole penis. Also, additional structures like the frenulum and ridged band are tucked away in the foreskin and have unique degrees of innervation. It isn't a singular structure.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 11:06 PM
2

What have you read? Why don’t you read this study published in the British Journal of Urology that concludes circumcision “ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/17378847/
/r/MensRights10/02/19 10:02 PM
8

You’ve seen American Circumcision and probably the adam ruins everything comedy sketch on YouTube. There is a lot more to look into.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 09:51 PM
7

There is a reason your aren’t interested in learning more. It is a very primal subconscious defense mechanism.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 09:47 PM
6

If I had one arm, I would prefer to have two.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 09:43 PM
15

It becomes very clear when you study the anatomy of an intact penis. That knowledge is lost to most Americans. How would someone born with one arm know that having two is better? Intuition and understanding. Also, adults have much different types of circumcisions than infants.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 09:14 PM
5

Watch the videos. Why would you be happy that innervated genital mucosal tissue, like the tissue that lines a woman’s vagina, was pulled up your penis and sliced off at birth? It’s like a sliding vagina on your penis that keeps the glans moist and not kerarinzed. There are also other significant structures like the frenulum and ridged band that oftentimes get excised depending on the type of infant circumcision you received.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 08:33 PM
18

Before you form an opinion, you need to have a clear understand of the anatomy of an intact penis. Here is an educational video that will highlight exactly that - https://youtu.be/s6on8BsMrsg Next, in order to understand the depth of how infant circumcision is a trauma, you need to see one. You can find that here - https://youtu.be/6c4Yq0nqhhA
/r/MensRights10/02/19 08:27 PM
4

Unfortunately, it is.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 09:59 PM
1

Who wouldn’t?
/r/MensRights09/02/19 02:37 PM
6

I’ve noticed that they seem to have more pleasure than me. I’m also circumcised though. The foreskin is like the vagina component of the penis, so you kinda miss out on the full experience.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 04:10 AM
6

In many other countries, they value the genital mucosal tissue on men much higher and won’t excise a portion of the shaft skin due to even multiple UTI’s. There is truly no pathological indication to do this in a child unless seriously medically needed.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 11:28 PM
3

Thank you reaching and and looking into it more. I have personally been profoundly harmed by my infant circumcision both mentally and physically, so it means a lot to me when another person can simply just recognize that there is something wrong here. Here is a recent public lecture given where you can learn the most up to date info on the discord surrounding this practice - https://youtu.be/_D1LPT_P7_o?t=13m15s Also, understand that most men cut as infants are in complete and total denial about…
/r/MensRights08/02/19 09:58 PM
6

This is a lecture recently given that sums up the points quite well - https://youtu.be/_D1LPT_P7_o?t=13m15s
/r/MensRights08/02/19 09:34 PM
2

https://imgur.com/a/G9yGLiz
/r/MensRights08/02/19 03:54 PM
2

https://imgur.com/a/G9yGLiz
/r/MensRights08/02/19 03:53 PM
5

The mods made me. Otherwise, no mercy.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 03:23 PM
4

https://youtu.be/_D1LPT_P7_o 9 minutes in is where the best comparisons are made.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 01:42 AM
4

Yes, I will get it. The speaker is Brian Earp. He makes the best argument on this to date.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 01:36 AM
4

... fuck. That shit is like mind control. How you really not know what they did? Just never look into it?
/r/MGTOW06/02/19 05:41 AM
4

Your penis head is constantly exposed? They pulled your shaft skin up your penis and cut it off like you we’re a fuckin pig. We need to stand up on this one. On god, they fucked you mate. It’s straight up genital mutilation. Took the sliding vagina off your penis.
/r/MGTOW06/02/19 05:09 AM
9

You should understand that there is a spectrum to the degree of tissue that gets removed during a circumcision. It isn’t the same procedure for everyone and men’s penises develop differently. You might have a loose circumcision which leaves you with a lot of functionality and your frenulum intact. Other men are not so lucky.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 04:44 PM
3

The truth is you just simply lose out on sexual pleasure when you are circumcised. The studies saying otherwise are all biased and influenced by the fact that the most common surgery in America is circumcision and a giant money maker. The foreskin is homologous with the clitoral hood on a female. It’s just supposed to be there for a variety of different reasons
/r/MensRights26/10/18 11:20 AM
1

This is absolute delusion. It has massive implications on the sexual function when you amputate the prepuce. It diminishes pleasure and changes the method of stimulation. We should not be pushing that on other groups of people. Especially when the “scientific” studies are an absolute joke.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 01:13 PM
17

I’ve had mental anguish for over a year now because of my infant circumcision. I can definitely see how it could cause someone to feel this way. It is the mobile skin system on your penis... having that taken away is no joke. Depending on how much of the sleeve they took off, it could have completely broke him
/r/MensRights30/09/18 07:05 PM
1

Gregory, is this you?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 11:47 PM
2

The most obvious hive mentality is routinely skinning infant penis in a highly violating unnecessary genital modification surgery without giving it a second thought. This would actually be going against the hive mind.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 07:53 PM
3

Nobody here agrees with you.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 01:55 PM
1

This is a pretty bad pic of him. If you look him up on Google - Nico Tortorella - he doesn't look at all like this.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 04:26 AM
1

Thanks
/r/MensRights08/09/18 02:52 AM
3

Brother K 2.0
/r/MensRights07/09/18 10:08 PM
3

this is a broken link
/r/MensRights07/09/18 09:11 PM
48

Absolute savage.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 05:28 PM
6

The foreskin is really the mobile mucosa membrane skin system on the penis. This is ablated to various degrees during a circumcision along with potentially other critical structures like the frenulum. These are not trivial pieces of the male body. The foreskin has massive implications in the functionality of the penis. It doesn't move the same way or get stimulated in the same way when it is gone. Definitely changes the mechanics. This educational youtube video of an uncircumcised man demonstrat…
/r/MensRights07/09/18 04:57 PM
1

Did you get a chance to look at the video?
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:40 AM
6

I have shared a video of an infant circumcision in the best of conditions by a doctor in a hospital with a topical anesthetic used - https://youtu.be/GjUCR44qZLE?t=10m32s It looks much more invasive and violating than rape to me. What do you think? I mean they are literally cutting off one of the most sensitive parts of his penis.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:01 AM
1

Why would you choice ever be to get the mucousal membrane sleeve cut off your penis? That is there for a lot of different reasons dude.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 11:57 PM
1

If this post gets enough exposure, hopefully more men can be informed on what this procedure entails and understand the true sexual cost. That is all I am trying to accomplish.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 10:17 PM
6

Yes, strapping an infant down and ablating the mucosal sleeve off his penis shortly after birth will almost certainly cause damage to the still developing neuronal networks in likely a profound way. It’s so obvious it hurts... literally
/r/MensRights14/08/18 04:07 PM
1

Here and ready for!
/r/MensRights03/08/18 07:10 AM
9

What does this mean? Are you saying he isn’t a man because he is upset that his foreskin got cut off his penis as an infant for no reason? That’s actually a perfectly acceptable thing to be angry about. He is 100% manning up by speaking out about it.
/r/MGTOW30/07/18 01:27 AM
5

What does this mean? You one of those, “I’m happy my parents circumcised me as a infant” guys?
/r/MensRights29/07/18 04:27 PM
2

Turning into somewhat of a martyr.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 02:42 AM
6

Eric left Foregen before he released his play.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 05:30 PM
8

I care as well.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 01:55 AM
5

Yep, the video's are what do it for most people. Next, maybe watch a neonatal circumcision procedure if you really want to know the full depth of this issue.
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 07:14 PM
2

It’s a subject you should look into more deeply. The best way understand the differences between an intact penis and cut one would be to watch an educational video of an intact one. I have linked to one below. It is literally of a real penis, so I would make sure to watch it in the right setting. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6on8BsMrsg&has_verified=1
/r/MensRights08/07/18 03:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter