TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

carniemechanic Archive

View 1 posts and 112 comments by carniemechanic on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

carniemechanic/r/MensRights09/02/12 01:15 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Just so. It's never the man who's portrayed as the villain. Or idiot. Or pervert.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 08:36 AM
4

It's such a crime to portray a fictitious woman as being as some actually are. Weep. Weep.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 11:36 PM
1

I said sad. Not amazing.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 10:50 PM
1

It's so sad that a vocal minority, that's given to lying and exaggeration, can have a government body so willing to do their bidding.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 02:03 PM
2

The difference being that I can prove bad numbers.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 03:59 PM
6

WOMEN have been driving yellow cabs in New York since the 1940s, but 99% of drivers are male A study in 2010 found that 80% of crashes in New York City that kill or seriously injure pedestrians involve male drivers. Women drivers are simply better. Can anyone else see the bad arithmetic?
/r/MensRights28/09/14 03:28 PM
1

I get that, too. A lot.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 08:07 AM
1

After years of nothing but rejection, how would you feel?
/r/MensRights16/09/14 12:32 AM
2

No, I don't. I know the meaning of each word.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 05:32 PM
4

You have over simplified it. The commonest response I got from women was, "Get away, you creep." (Or variations on that theme.) I gave up trying years ago. Never got to go on a date, get married, father a child... The closest I came to a date was a phony telephone number, or stood up. A person can bear only so much rejection, before starting to feel homicidal urges. So it's best to just quit trying.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 09:36 PM
1

You might not want to hold your breath.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 08:45 PM
0

Now, there's a great way to clarify your meaning. My understanding is much improved.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 11:33 PM
0

I'm not sure what you mean.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 08:15 PM
0

"What if a man came and snatched her?" is why. Read the article. In today's world, there are children, women, and bogey men.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 01:22 AM
0

The very first minute of that was sufficient, on its own.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 05:23 PM
1

He did nothing wrong. They were exploring. Kids do that. Judging by the over the top reaction of the mom who complained, her little girl will grow up with a very warped notion of sexuality. She probably reacts to anything about the body with admonishments about how nasty and unmentionable it is.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 06:10 PM
1

There is no justice involved. Think "affluenza."
/r/MensRights10/07/14 08:24 AM
1

That's a clever user name.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 07:34 PM
1

They are properly used.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 07:02 PM
2

Don't you think, at this point, that "justice system," is a misnomer?
/r/MensRights09/07/14 06:53 PM
1

No, she's a monster.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 12:19 AM
6

This is about using tax payer funding to promote violence against males.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:47 PM
3

That is not how I read that.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 09:58 PM
1

Soon, some rich guy will successfully use one of these cases to get off free for molesting a kid, and the judicial system will have a real problem.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 12:38 AM
2

I think the deeper you become involved in feminist groups, the more hateful you'll find them to e. Equal rights is a reasonable, even noble, goal. These groups are about oppression.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 11:06 PM
1

As with so many with slanted world views, they only acknowledge "facts" supportive of what they want others to believe. It's not uncommon, advertisers do it, the religious do it, parents, politicians, and on, and on. Always be skeptical of any message.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 12:00 AM
1

You might enjoy it, if you like weirdness, they have their own special kind, there.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 08:45 AM
1

You'll have to go to Japan, in Summer.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 12:52 AM
2

Cake?
/r/MensRights08/06/14 11:14 PM
7

Okay. Bang. You're dead.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 11:12 PM
-11

What? Would you edit that?
/r/MensRights08/06/14 11:01 PM
7

The last sentence in the article says all that needs saying.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 10:52 AM
0

RE Edit 3: What is the need for tact? Considering the situation, I think tact is already out the door.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 12:17 PM
1

I have no problem with either concept. The problem is with someone of either gender expecting to have a facility bend over backward to accommodate his or her personal dislikes after joining. If she had wanted an all female membership, she should have joined such a place. Then, if men had been in the weight room, it might have been"not fair," as she said. It's like expecting Sprint to provide a land line after deciding mobile service is no longer needed.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 01:38 AM
1

I shall.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 08:41 PM
1

And yet another pithy and cogent response.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 08:30 PM
1

Give it up. There is nothing else implied in the quoted remark. The physical expressions and gestures can not be expressed in a verbatum text quote. You are wrongly inferring information that is unavailable, and injecting it into the debate as fact. That is poor form, and is not sufficient to support your premise. I will not waste my time countering conjecture.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 07:22 PM
1

I'll decline to put words into others' mouths I'll give her the benefit of doubt in that she's capable of expressing her thoughts intelligibly.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 06:46 PM
1

What you are telling me is that it's reasonable to extrapolate additional meaning from what's said, rather than accept a remark as meaning exactly what's said. I've been listening wrong for a long time, taking peoples' remarks at face value. Silly me. Missing all the implied subtext.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 05:22 PM
1

That was their complaint. "oh nooooo, we can't go in there, there's men!"
/r/MensRights06/04/14 04:24 PM
1

Want to avoid all that stuff? Don't go into business. Resolve complaints fairly, some are baseless, but not all. Resolve complications, they're just a part of everyday life. Fight frivolous suits, or cowardly cede your rights to anyone who would take them.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 04:21 PM
3

There are already women only gyms. Open a men only gym, and women will sue to get in. They will then complain the men are there. There will be no end to it until men have no right to go anywhere, do anything, say anything, like anything, or think anything.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 04:03 PM
1

We should accept that they believed that they couldn't exercise because men were present?
/r/MensRights06/04/14 03:59 PM
5

Quick! Tell CNN.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 12:57 PM
5

Your question implies actual reasoning was occurring. Silly rabbit.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 12:54 PM
3

Why have separate ones?
/r/MensRights06/04/14 12:50 PM
6

You've captured the essence of it.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 12:49 PM
1

What's described in the article is entirely too true. It's not just an academic phenomenon.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 06:08 PM
2

Qualify that: "not all"
/r/MensRights23/03/14 01:40 PM
16

USPS?
/r/MensRights23/03/14 01:38 PM
2

Look at the history of our government. During the Vietnam war, the complaint was that we couldn't vote because of being too young, yet were old enough for a draft that could send us to our death. So the government lowered the voting age to eighteen from twenty-one. They ignored the real issue, and instead made an end run around it, by giving people, still too young to be sentenced to death for no reason, one less objection. The conflict ground on, despite overwhelming opposition, for years.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 01:35 PM
8

It's nearly impossible to educate those who believe their religious beliefs trump reason.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 12:47 PM
4

There's always some religious group crying. It's time society stopped yielding to the coercion.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 12:40 PM
3

None the less a child. Also fictitious.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 12:15 AM
3

Not at all. Puberty is occurring earlier in well fed populations, but those kids are still possessed of children's minds. They are not suddenly mature by simple virtue of hormone induced physical changes.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 10:37 PM
3

What the Great Green Fuck? Choice.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 10:16 PM
2

In one sentence. And it can be applied to other "victims'" activism. Stellar.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 11:48 PM
1

No. They'll still control all the pussy, carry all the babies, and control more than half the money. All the real power.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 11:35 PM
1

Reading that was agonizing. I, unfortunately, can relate to too much of what was detailed by that narrative. This should not be turned into a pissing match about what feminists say. The injustices addressed by the writer are much too important to be diminished by being grouped with other, lesser unfairness.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 12:42 AM
1

How did you derive such a broad meaning from what I said? There are games that have "normal" appearing characters. Just as there are now people on television who look fairly ordinary. There are people who manage to take offense to almost everything on television. They are the same ones who find offense every where else. I stand by my position that one should not attend that which offends him. Games. Television shows. Movies. Books. Art exhibits. Even the beach, for that matter. (Yes there are th…
/r/MensRights27/01/14 08:24 PM
1

So what? people can choose to play, or not. This is just as stupid as complaining that a program on television is offensive, yet all one must do is watch the ones that don't offend. Or if a genre of music displeases the ear, don't listen to it. These games are escapes from reality for those whose lives are less than they might reasonably hope to attain. As such, they are fantasies, and unrealistic. That's the point.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 10:10 AM
45

The handicap was 20:30. She started back in the pack of women, evidently. So, in fact, she beat a bunch of women in a real race, and men in a fixed one. The press is so afraid of offending, they don't report anything accurately, any more, unless they're assured they won't offend those who seek to be offended. Bottom line: What's the point of the whole race, at all?
/r/MensRights19/01/14 09:38 PM
1

You waste your time. And mine.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 11:20 PM
1

Her remarks are stupid. There is no contextual frame that will make them otherwise.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 10:24 PM
9

And I, too.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 01:10 AM
2

It should have been shown
/r/MensRights30/12/13 01:09 AM
1

Stupid needs context?
/r/MensRights30/12/13 12:58 AM
0

All I get with the link is a blank screen.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 10:22 AM
0

Some say black cats are bad luck. Just as valid.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 10:19 AM
0

I can't argue the closing sentence. The intent of the billboard is to inform spouses that they can hurt their cheating mates. It's visual hyperbole.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 08:37 PM
-4

This isn't misandry.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 07:38 PM
4

No message? Really? I guess there's no moon, either. Got it.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 11:11 AM
1

I knew that. I wonder why anyone, including the press, would wish to quote her.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 05:31 PM
1

As long as it's without her.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 11:03 AM
1

I guess that means they're just as dead as the soliers?
/r/MensRights07/06/13 11:01 AM
8

It's certainly how to become a dead man.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 08:49 PM
0

You're an idiot if you think this diminishes TED.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 10:56 PM
8

Unreal.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 11:37 AM
1

Your response is too hastily considered. The police will pull any dirty, underhanded, devious tactic they can imagine to get a confession or even an implied confession of guilt. They know most people are scared and uninformed of their rights.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 08:21 PM
1

Yeah.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 09:28 AM
3

I was refused more pay for the reason that my boss said, "You don't have kids to feed, you don't deserve it." It wasn't his business, and I was at least as productive as my colleagues. More so than a couple.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 02:54 AM
2

It gives the feminists real reason to be angry. The (all male) court has put the blame for a man's inappropriate urges squarely on the woman, and absolves him of any responsibility, or need to control himself as a real man. It's asinine.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 02:24 AM
0

The article said the impetus for this for this is to accommodate religious proscriptions.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 10:39 AM
1

It sounds sexist, but in fact is using tax money for religious purposes. To that, I object.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 01:34 AM
2

It was downtown, near the Naval shipyard. Long ago. Grubby public facility.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 11:43 PM
3

I'm sure some guys would like that. I have seen a woman pee at a urinal, in a men's room in Philly.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 12:47 PM
10

Stunning. I have no other words.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 12:40 PM
9

Lighten up.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 09:12 PM
2

My thoughts, too. What is the crime?
/r/MensRights26/10/12 10:07 AM
2

Perhaps "disparity" is the word you needed?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 01:58 AM
8

You couldn't have written a more accurate headline. /r/SRS is a cesspool.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:35 PM
7

Downvoted for your juvenile, dismissive response to an intelligent, well reasoned post
/r/MensRights15/05/12 11:43 AM
2

Your friend? Really? I wouldn't consider someone with a mindset like that capable of being a friend. Of. Anyone.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 01:13 AM
2

It had already, at the start.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:19 PM
1

It's impossible to know the thinking of the judge. We don't know whether the judge were Jewish, (as many in NYC are) and how that might have swayed the outcome. I hope this is signal of things to come, but the religious are very tenacious in exercising their "prerogatives." I just hope the dad isn't a total ass about it, and accepts his son's decisions. He's still a young man, and needs a completed education.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 10:22 PM
-2

That's a very misleading headline you wrote, there, submitter.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 12:28 PM
1

The judge stated, early on, that the kid's wishes weren't legally relevant. Did you miss that (bolded) phrase?
/r/MensRights12/02/12 12:27 PM
8

You're right, it's alright. It's also important to choose your battles. The misandry in ads is allowed because we men can laugh at ourselves, women, not so much. Now, here come the harpies to attack me.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 03:19 AM
7

Still crap.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 01:51 AM
-8

I did read several of the articles. It's just bitching. I won't waste time on a bunch of bitching about such inconsequential matters.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 12:10 AM
-5

I did read several of the articles. it's just bitching. I won't waste time on a bunch of bitching about such inconsequential matters.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 12:10 AM
-6

I did read several of the articles. it's just bitching. I won't waste time on a bunch of bitching about such inconsequential matters.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 12:09 AM
-7

The article is just whining about men, that we're men. No specific complaint. Just, basically:Men Grrrrrr. No offer of how men could improve. No specific thing that men do as a group. Just: Men Grrrrr. If ew do something that truly needs improving, which we do, point out that thing; such as: macho driven self destructive behavior. Or refusing to admit to being wrong. Just not: (insert unspecified thing here), I'm alread complaining, you fill in the blank. It is, simply put, bullshit. If you hate…
/r/MensRights14/12/11 11:55 PM
-5

The article is just whining about men, that we're men. No specific complaint. Just, basically:Men Grrrrrr. No offer of how men could improve. No specific thing that men do as a group. Just: Men Grrrrr. If ew do something that truly needs improving, which we do, point out that thing; such as: macho driven self destructive behavior. Or refusing to admit to being wrong. Just not: (insert unspecified thing here), I'm alread complaining, you fill in the blank. It is, simply put, bullshit. If you hate…
/r/MensRights14/12/11 11:54 PM
-7

That's how it's whining. If you have a real complaint, say what it is. That article basically just whines, and doesn't ever get to a point. I don't know why. Just stop.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 11:12 PM
-7

Why post that nonsensical article, or anything from that whinesite?
/r/MensRights14/12/11 10:53 PM
4

Why no one has said it...Many women think it's okay to use men as punching bags. Some women are just inclined to violence. There is no shortage of psycho bitches, which, as a side note, seems the only sort of woman I could ever attract.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 03:07 PM
4

That's some fine reasoning and self expression, Mr. Pro.
/r/MensRights10/12/11 03:54 AM
3

You posted well considered remarks, and thanks. I think there's a lot to womens' sensitivity to even slightly negative portrayal, and that's a shame. The problem isn't that we just don't care, it's that we can laugh at ourselves more readily. We simply aren't as thin skinned. Men are more likely to use self deprecating humor; it's almost an entirely male trait. Some men have been objecting to the obvious slights, but there isn't a cohesive objection, and we don't have the desire to go for the ju…
/r/MensRights06/12/11 11:02 PM
5

Because women as a group have become too thin skinned and made sure it's PC to only portray men in any negative light. Hollywood's afraid to offend them.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 07:53 PM
1

Too common.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 01:23 PM
19

Can't argue this; it would be different if it were reversible. The bad part is that it can wait until later in life.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 12:24 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter